80 FR 68766 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution Control District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 215 (November 6, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 215 (November 6, 2015)
| Page Range | 68766-68768 | |
| FR Document | 2015-28274 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 215 (Friday, November 6, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 68766-68768] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-28274] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0643; FRL-9935-65-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Placer County portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the necessary procedures to create emission reduction credits (ERCs) from the reduction of volatile organic compound (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of sulfur (SOx), particulate matter (PM), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions due to the use and installation of a control device on stationary locomotive engines in rail yards. We are approving a local rule that provides administrative procedures for creating emissions reduction credits, consistent with Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements. DATES: This rule is effective on January 5, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by December 7, 2015. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR- 2015-0643, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on- line instructions. 2. Email: [email protected]. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. Instructions: Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html for further instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. For the full EPA public comment policy and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, lev[email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this action with the dates that it was adopted by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PCAPCD.............................. 515 Stationary Rail Yard 02-19-2015 06-26-2015 Control Emission Reduction Credits. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On August 13, 2015, the EPA determined that the submittal for PCAPCD Rule 515 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of this rule? There are no previous versions of Rule 515 in the SIP, although the PCAPCD adopted an earlier version of this rule on October 9, 2008, and CARB submitted it to us on December 23, 2008. CARB withdrew the earlier version of Rule 515 on August 11, 2014. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule? The purpose of Rule 515 is to provide owners of a rail yard located in Placer County with a mechanism for quantifying, certifying, and banking emission reductions from the installation and use of a control device that reduces emissions from locomotive engines in rail yards. Approval of Rule 515 into the SIP would allow these emission reductions to be used as offsets under PCAPCD's New Source Review (NSR) rule. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). In addition, a rule of this type that generates emission reduction credits for use as offsets in the NSR program must [[Page 68767]] meet the NSR requirements for valid offsets (see section 173(c)) and meet the criteria set forth in the EPA's guidance concerning economic incentive programs. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability and other requirements consistently include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOx Supplement), 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992. 3. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook). 4. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 5. New Source Review--Section 173(c) of the CAA and 40 CFR part 51, appendix S, ``Emission Offset Interpretative Ruling'' require certain sources to obtain emission reductions to offset increased emissions from new projects. 6. ``Improving Air Quality with Economic Incentive Programs,'' EPA- 452/R-01-001, January 2001. B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? We believe this rule is consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability and economic incentive programs; and ensures that the emission reductions are real, surplus, quantifiable, enforceable, and permanent. This rule includes detailed emissions quantification protocols and enforceable procedures that provide the necessary assurance that the emission reduction credits issued will meet the criteria for valid NSR offsets. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we receive adverse comments by December 7, 2015, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on January 5, 2016. This will incorporate the rule into the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the CARB Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 5, 2016. [[Page 68768]] Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur dioxide, Carbon monoxide, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: September 25, 2015. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(463) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (463) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on June 26, 2015 by the Governor's designee. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Placer County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 515, ``Stationary Rail Yard Control Emission Reduction Credits,'' amended on February 19, 2015. [FR Doc. 2015-28274 Filed 11-5-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![68766 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
will be used in the calculation of the December 7, 2015. If we receive such Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
duty refund and allocations.’’ comments, we will publish a timely California 94105–3901. While all
[FR Doc. 2015–28284 Filed 11–5–15; 8:45 am] withdrawal in the Federal Register to documents in the docket are listed at
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
notify the public that this direct final www.regulations.gov, some information
rule will not take effect. may be publicly available only at the
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION identified by docket number EPA–R09– material, large maps), and some may not
AGENCY OAR–2015–0643, by one of the be publicly available in either location
following methods: (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
40 CFR Part 52 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: materials, please schedule an
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line appointment during normal business
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0643; FRL–9935–65– hours with the contact listed in the FOR
instructions.
Region 9]
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Approval of California Air Plan 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
Control District 3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov.
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Instructions: Once submitted, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agency (EPA). comments cannot be edited or Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
ACTION: Direct final rule. withdrawn. The EPA may publish any and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
comment received to its public docket.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Do not submit electronically any Table of Contents
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final information you consider to be I. The State’s Submittal
action to approve a revision to the Confidential Business Information (CBI) A. What rule did the State submit?
Placer County portion of the California or other information whose disclosure is B. Are there other versions of this rule?
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This restricted by statute. If you need to C. What is the purpose of the submitted
revision concerns the necessary include CBI as part of your comment, rule?
procedures to create emission reduction please visit http://www.epa.gov/ II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
credits (ERCs) from the reduction of dockets/comments.html for further A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
volatile organic compound (VOC), B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
instructions. Multimedia submissions
oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of criteria?
(audio, video, etc.) must be C. Public Comment and Final Action
sulfur (SOx), particulate matter (PM), accompanied by a written comment. III. Incorporation by Reference
and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions The written comment is considered the IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
due to the use and installation of a official comment and should include
control device on stationary locomotive discussion of all points you wish to I. The State’s Submittal
engines in rail yards. We are approving make. For the full EPA public comment A. What rule did the State submit?
a local rule that provides administrative policy and general guidance on making
procedures for creating emissions effective comments, please visit http:// Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
reduction credits, consistent with Clean www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. action with the dates that it was adopted
Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements. Docket: Generally, documents in the by the Placer County Air Pollution
DATES: This rule is effective on January docket for this action are available Control District (PCAPCD) and
5, 2016 without further notice, unless electronically at www.regulations.gov or submitted by the California Air
the EPA receives adverse comments by in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
PCAPCD ......................................................... 515 Stationary Rail Yard Control Emission Re- 02–19–2015 06–26–2015
duction Credits.
On August 13, 2015, the EPA C. What is the purpose of the submitted II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
determined that the submittal for rule?
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
PCAPCD Rule 515 met the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, The purpose of Rule 515 is to provide SIP rules must be enforceable (see
which must be met before formal EPA owners of a rail yard located in Placer CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
review. County with a mechanism for interfere with applicable requirements
quantifying, certifying, and banking concerning attainment and reasonable
B. Are there other versions of this rule? emission reductions from the further progress or other CAA
installation and use of a control device requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
There are no previous versions of that reduces emissions from locomotive and must not modify certain SIP control
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Rule 515 in the SIP, although the engines in rail yards. Approval of Rule requirements in nonattainment areas
PCAPCD adopted an earlier version of 515 into the SIP would allow these without ensuring equivalent or greater
this rule on October 9, 2008, and CARB emission reductions to be used as offsets emissions reductions (see CAA section
submitted it to us on December 23, under PCAPCD’s New Source Review 193).
2008. CARB withdrew the earlier (NSR) rule. The EPA’s technical support In addition, a rule of this type that
version of Rule 515 on August 11, 2014. document (TSD) has more information generates emission reduction credits for
about this rule. use as offsets in the NSR program must
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:19 Nov 05, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM 06NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_68981/page/1.svg)
![68768 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Filing a petition for reconsideration by ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION I. Background
the Administrator of this final rule does AGENCY The SIP is a living document which
not affect the finality of this action for a state revises as necessary to address its
the purposes of judicial review nor does 40 CFR Part 52
unique air pollution problems.
it extend the time within which a [EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0428; FRL–9932–61– Therefore, the EPA, from time to time,
petition for judicial review may be filed, Region 8] must take action on SIP revisions
and shall not postpone the effectiveness containing new and/or revised
of such rule or action. Parties with Air Plan Approval; WY; Update to regulations as being part of the SIP. On
objections to this direct final rule are Materials Incorporated by Reference May 22, 1997 (62 FR 27968), the EPA
encouraged to file a comment in revised the procedures for incorporating
response to the parallel notice of AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). by reference Federally-approved SIPs, as
proposed rulemaking for this action a result of consultation between the EPA
published in the Proposed Rules section ACTION: Final rule; administrative
change. and the Office of the Federal Register
of this Federal Register, rather than file (OFR). The description of the revised
an immediate petition for judicial SIP document, IBR procedures and
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
review of this direct final rule, so that ‘‘Identification of Plan’’ format are
Agency (EPA) is updating the materials
the EPA can withdraw this direct final discussed in further detail in the May
that are incorporated by reference (IBR)
rule and address the comment in the 22, 1997, Federal Register document.
into the Wyoming State Implementation
proposed rulemaking. This action may On November 2, 2006 (71 FR 64460) the
Plan (SIP). The Regulations affected by
not be challenged later in proceedings to EPA published the revised format of the
this update have been previously
enforce its requirements (see section IBR material for Wyoming as of August
submitted by the Wyoming Department
307(b)(2)). 31, 2006. Today’s action is an update to
of Environmental Quality and approved
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 by the EPA. In this action, the EPA is the November 2, 2006 document.
Environmental protection, Air also notifying the public of corrections II. EPA Action
pollution control, Incorporation by to typographical errors and minor
formatting changes to the IBR tables. In this action, the EPA is announcing
reference, Intergovernmental relations, the update to the IBR material as of
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate This update affects the SIP materials
that are available for public inspection September 1, 2015. The EPA is also
matter, Sulfur dioxide, Carbon correcting typographical errors,
monoxide, Reporting and recordkeeping at the EPA Regional Office.
DATES: This action is effective including omission and other minor
requirements, Volatile organic errors in subsection 52.2620, paragraphs
compounds. November 6, 2015.
(c), (d), and (e).
Dated: September 25, 2015. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket III. Good Cause Exemption
Jared Blumenfeld,
Identification Number EPA–R08–OAR– EPA has determined that today’s
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
2015–0428. All documents in the docket action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code are listed on the http:// exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
of Federal Regulations is amended as www.regulations.gov Web site. Although Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
follows: listed in the index, some information which, upon a finding of ‘‘good cause’’
may not be publicly available, i.e., authorizes agencies to dispense with
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Confidential Business Information or
PROMULGATION OF public participation, and section
other information the disclosure of 553(d)(3), which allows an agency to
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS which is restricted by statute. Certain make a rule effective immediately
other material, such as copyrighted (thereby avoiding the 30-day delayed
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
material, is not placed on the Internet effective date otherwise provided for in
continues to read as follows:
and will be publicly available only in the APA). Today’s action simply
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. the hard copy form. Publicly available updates the codification of provisions
docket materials are available either which are already in effect as a matter
Subpart F—California electronically through http:// of law.
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Under section 553 of the APA, an
adding paragraph (c)(463) to read as EPA Region 8, Office of Partnership and agency may find good cause where
follows: Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, procedures are ‘‘impractical,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado unnecessary, or contrary to the public
§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 80202–1129. The EPA requests that you interest.’’ Public comment is
* * * * * contact the individual listed in the FOR ‘‘unnecessary’’ and ‘‘contrary to the
(c) * * * FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to public interest’’ since the codification
(463) Amended regulations for the view the hard copy of the docket. An only reflects existing law. Likewise,
following APCDs were submitted on electronic copy of the State’s SIP there is no purpose served by delaying
June 26, 2015 by the Governor’s compilation is also available at http:// the effective date of this action.
designee. www.epa.gov/region8/air/sip.html. In this rule, EPA is finalizing
(i) Incorporation by reference. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: regulatory text that includes
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(A) Placer County Air Pollution Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S. incorporation by reference. In
Control District. Environmental Protection Agency accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
(1) Rule 515, ‘‘Stationary Rail Yard (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
Control Emission Reduction Credits,’’ Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado by reference of the Wyoming regulations
amended on February 19, 2015. 80202–1129, (303) 312–6142, described in the amendments to 40 CFR
[FR Doc. 2015–28274 Filed 11–5–15; 8:45 am] ayala.kathy@epa.gov. part 52 set forth below. EPA has made,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and will continue to make, these
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:19 Nov 05, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM 06NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_68981/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 15:09:27
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 15:09:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on January 5, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by December 7, 2015. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3848, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 68766 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Sulfur Dioxide; Carbon Monoxide; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR