80 FR 70253 - Opportunity To Comment on Changes to the Nevada and California Greater Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan Amendment, Nevada

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 219 (November 13, 2015)

Page Range		70253-70254
FR Document		2015-28876

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is soliciting comments on significant changes to the Proposed Plan as set forth in the Greater Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment (BSSG) Forest Plan Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), announced on February 13, 2015. Following consideration of any comments on these changes, the BLM intends to issue a Record of Decision (ROD) amending the Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 219 (Friday, November 13, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 219 (Friday, November 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70253-70254]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVC00000.L16100000.DR0000; 14-08807; MO# 4500080864]


Opportunity To Comment on Changes to the Nevada and California 
Greater Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment Carson City 
Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and the Tonopah 
Field Office Resource Management Plan Amendment, Nevada

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is soliciting comments on 
significant changes to the Proposed Plan as set forth in the Greater 
Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment (BSSG) Forest Plan 
Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), announced on 
February 13, 2015. Following consideration of any comments on these 
changes, the BLM intends to issue a Record of Decision (ROD) amending 
the Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and 
the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan.

DATES: Written comments on the changes to the Proposed Plan will be 
accepted until December 14, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the significant changes 
to the Proposed Plan by any of the following methods:
     Email: [email protected].
     Fax: 775-885-6147.
     Mail: BLM Carson City District, Attn: Colleen Sievers, 
Project Manager, 5665 Morgan Mill Rd., Carson City, NV 89701.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen Sievers, Project Manager, 
telephone: 775-885-6168; address: 5665 Morgan Mill Rd., Carson City, NV 
89701; email: [email protected]. Persons who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours 
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Forest Service (USFS) was 
the lead agency for preparing the BSSG Forest Plan Amendment (Plan 
Amendment) and Final EIS. As part of that effort and based on the 
analysis in the Final EIS, the BLM, a cooperating agency, proposes to 
amend the Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management 
Plan and the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan. Following 
the release of the Proposed Plan and the conclusion of the protest 
process, the BLM identified changes and a clarification for the 
Proposed Plan as explained below and determined, pursuant to the 
applicable authorities (43 CFR 1610.2(f)(5) and 43 CFR 1610.5-1(b)), 
that public comment on those measures is necessary. The environmental 
consequences of the proposed changes and clarification have been 
analyzed as part of the Plan Amendment and Final EIS. After considering 
any comments on these changes, the BLM expects to issue a ROD amending 
the Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and 
the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan.
    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Notice of 
Availability (NOA) for the BSSG Forest Plan Amendment/Draft EIS in the 
Federal Register on August 23, 2013 (78 FR 52524), which initiated a 
90-day comment period. An NOA for the BSSG Forest Plan Amendment/
Revised Draft EIS was published by the EPA on July 11, 2014 (79 FR 
40100), which initiated a second 90-day comment period. The EPA 
published the NOA for the BSSG Forest Plan Amendment and Final EIS in 
the Federal Register on February 13, 2015 (80 FR 8081), which initiated 
a 30-day BLM protest period and 60-day Governors consistency review 
period. The Plan Amendment and Final EIS identified the BLM Plan as the 
Proposed Plan. The BLM received three protest letters. In response to 
those protests and based on additional policy discussions, the BLM has 
determined that it will clarify and make changes to the Proposed Plan.
    The clarification and changes include: (1) Identifying disturbance 
levels within BSSG habitat; (2) Adjusting buffers for tall structures 
near active or pending leks; (3) Adding a restriction for new high-
power transmission lines; and (4) Changing on-the-ground management for 
habitat connectivity. This notice identifies those clarifications and 
changes and initiates a 30-day public comment period (43 CFR 
1610.2(f)(5) and 43 CFR 1610.5-1(b)).

Habitat Disturbance--Proposed Change

    The BLM is changing the Proposed Plan, as it was set forth in the 
Plan Amendment and Final EIS, to set a total anthropogenic disturbance 
of no more than 3 percent of the total BSSG habitat on Federal lands 
within the Bodie Mountain/Grant, Desert Creek/Fales, and White 
Mountains population management unit boundaries (C-Wild-S-04), and a 
total anthropogenic disturbance of no more than 1.5 percent of the 
total BSSG habitat on Federal lands within the Pine Nut Mountains 
population management unit (PMU)

[[Page 70254]]

boundaries (C-Wild-S-05), due to higher presence of risk factors in the 
PMU as analyzed under Final EIS Alternative C. This change is being 
made in response to issues raised during the protest period and based 
on additional policy discussions.
    Concerns were raised by the public that the BLM action was not 
adequate to protect BSSG and its habitat. Disturbance levels identified 
in the Final EIS will require site-specific project mitigation to 
insure no unmitigated net loss of habitat. This requires assessing 
habitat availability at the landscape scale.

Tall Structure Buffer--Proposed Change

    As part of the protest process, the BLM found that it needed to 
correct an error in the Proposed Plan Amendment and Final EIS. The BLM 
found that it should have identified the buffer distance for tall 
structures as 4 miles from active or pending leks. This is consistent 
with management prescriptions proposed by the USFS. Specifically, the 
BLM proposes to adopt the action from Alternative C which states that 
tall structures, which could serve as predator perches, will not be 
authorized within 4 miles of an active or pending lek (C-LUSU-S-04). 
The 4-mile lek buffer accords with other prescriptions of surface 
disturbance in sage-grouse habitat and is consistent with best science 
available.

High-Voltage (>=120kV) Transmission Line--Proposed Change

    The BLM is designating exclusion areas for new high-power (>=120kV) 
transmission lines in BSSG habitat. Specifically, new high-power 
(>=120kV) transmission line corridors, rights-of-way, facilities, or 
construction areas in habitat (outside of existing corridors) will not 
be authorized (C-Min-S-09). This change is being made in response to 
issues raised during the protest period and based on additional policy 
discussions and was analyzed under Alternative C in the EIS.

Connectivity Habitat--Proposed Change

    The BLM is clarifying language from Alternative C to provide for 
management of connectivity habitat. The BSSG landscape is fragmented by 
areas of agriculture and urbanization, as well as areas of naturally 
occurring and encroaching pinyon-juniper vegetation. Sage-grouse 
habitats within and between PMU are often separated by stretches of 
unsuitable areas that may inhibit sage-grouse movements across the 
landscape. Alternative C provides a limited amount of management 
direction to maintain or enhance suitability of connective area. 
Alternative C includes a goal about habitat and movement and an 
objective of improving degraded habitat, including areas with conifer 
encroachment (i.e., pinyon-juniper). Actions and Best Management 
Practices relating to connectivity apply primarily to mineral uses. 
Alternative C states that where valid existing rights exist, in 
connective habitat areas, vegetation characteristics suitable to sage-
grouse should be maintained to the extent technically feasible (C-Min-
S-01). In addition, Alternative C provides additional direction not 
specific to connectivity which states, ``Vegetation treatments and 
post-disturbance restoration should seed and/or transplant sagebrush to 
restore large patches of sagebrush cover and connect existing patches'' 
(C-Wild-S-02). Given the fragmented nature of the bi-state landscape 
and the level of apparent isolation of subpopulations, additional 
management direction for connective habitat area is necessary to 
facilitate sage-grouse movement, reduce isolation, and increase genetic 
interchange between subpopulations. This change is being made in 
response to policy discussions.
    Please note that public comments and information submitted 
including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who 
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at 
the above address during regular business hours (7:30 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m.), Monday through Friday, except holidays.
    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2

John F. Ruhs,
Acting State Director, Nevada.
[FR Doc. 2015-28876 Filed 11-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P

70254 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 219 / Friday, November 13, 2015 / Notices

boundaries (C–Wild–S–05), due to direction to maintain or enhance DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
higher presence of risk factors in the suitability of connective area.
PMU as analyzed under Final EIS Alternative C includes a goal about Bureau of Land Management
Alternative C. This change is being habitat and movement and an objective [LLCA932000.L13400000.DQ0000.
made in response to issues raised during of improving degraded habitat, LXSSB0020000.16X]
the protest period and based on including areas with conifer
additional policy discussions. encroachment (i.e., pinyon-juniper). Notice of Availability of the Desert
Concerns were raised by the public Actions and Best Management Practices Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
that the BLM action was not adequate to Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment
relating to connectivity apply primarily
protect BSSG and its habitat. to the California Desert Conservation
to mineral uses. Alternative C states that
Disturbance levels identified in the Plan and the Bakersfield and Bishop
Final EIS will require site-specific where valid existing rights exist, in
Resource Management Plans and Final
project mitigation to insure no connective habitat areas, vegetation
Environmental Impact Statement
unmitigated net loss of habitat. This characteristics suitable to sage-grouse
requires assessing habitat availability at should be maintained to the extent AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
the landscape scale. technically feasible (C–Min–S–01). In Interior.
addition, Alternative C provides ACTION: Notice.
Tall Structure Buffer—Proposed additional direction not specific to
Change SUMMARY: In accordance with the
connectivity which states, ‘‘Vegetation
As part of the protest process, the National Environmental Policy Act of
treatments and post-disturbance 1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
BLM found that it needed to correct an restoration should seed and/or
error in the Proposed Plan Amendment Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
transplant sagebrush to restore large amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land
and Final EIS. The BLM found that it patches of sagebrush cover and connect Management (BLM) has prepared a
should have identified the buffer existing patches’’ (C–Wild–S–02). Given Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment
distance for tall structures as 4 miles the fragmented nature of the bi-state (LUPA) and Final Environmental Impact
from active or pending leks. This is landscape and the level of apparent Statement (EIS) for the Desert
consistent with management isolation of subpopulations, additional Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
prescriptions proposed by the USFS. management direction for connective (DRECP). This LUPA would amend the
Specifically, the BLM proposes to adopt
habitat area is necessary to facilitate California Desert Conservation Area
the action from Alternative C which
sage-grouse movement, reduce isolation, (CDCA) Plan and the Bakersfield and
states that tall structures, which could
and increase genetic interchange Bishop Resource Management Plans
serve as predator perches, will not be (RMPs). By this notice, the BLM is
authorized within 4 miles of an active between subpopulations. This change is
being made in response to policy announcing the availability of the
or pending lek (C–LUSU–S–04). The 4- Proposed LUPA and Final EIS.
mile lek buffer accords with other discussions.
DATES: BLM planning regulations state
prescriptions of surface disturbance in Please note that public comments and
that any person who meets the
sage-grouse habitat and is consistent information submitted including names,
conditions as described in the
with best science available. street addresses, and email addresses of regulations may protest the BLM’s
High-Voltage (≥120kV) Transmission persons who submit comments will be Proposed LUPA/Final EIS. A person
Line—Proposed Change available for public review and who meets the conditions and files a
disclosure at the above address during protest must do so within 30 days of the
The BLM is designating exclusion
regular business hours (7:30 a.m. to 4:30 date that the Environmental Protection
areas for new high-power (≥120kV)
p.m.), Monday through Friday, except Agency publishes its Notice of
transmission lines in BSSG habitat.
holidays. Availability in the Federal Register.
Specifically, new high-power (≥120kV)
transmission line corridors, rights-of- Before including your address, phone ADDRESSES: Copies of the DRECP
way, facilities, or construction areas in number, email address, or other Proposed LUPA and Final EIS have
habitat (outside of existing corridors) personal identifying information in your been sent to affected Federal, State, and
will not be authorized (C–Min–S–09). comment, you should be aware that local government agencies, affected
This change is being made in response your entire comment—including your tribal governments, and to other
to issues raised during the protest personal identifying information—may stakeholders. The Proposed LUPA and
period and based on additional policy be made publicly available at any time. Final EIS are available for review online
discussions and was analyzed under While you can ask us in your comment at www.drecp.org and www.blm.gov/ca/
Alternative C in the EIS. to withhold your personal identifying drecp. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below for a list of
Connectivity Habitat—Proposed Change information from public review, we
locations where copies of the Proposed
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
The BLM is clarifying language from LUPA and Final EIS are available for
do so.
Alternative C to provide for public inspection.
management of connectivity habitat. Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, All protests must be in writing and
The BSSG landscape is fragmented by 43 CFR 1610.2 mailed to one of the following
areas of agriculture and urbanization, as addresses: Regular Mail: BLM Director
John F. Ruhs,
well as areas of naturally occurring and (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator,
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

encroaching pinyon-juniper vegetation. Acting State Director, Nevada. P.O. Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–
Sage-grouse habitats within and [FR Doc. 2015–28876 Filed 11–12–15; 8:45 am] 1383; Overnight Delivery: BLM Director
between PMU are often separated by BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator, 20
stretches of unsuitable areas that may M Street SE., Room 2134LM,
inhibit sage-grouse movements across Washington, DC 20003.
the landscape. Alternative C provides a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
limited amount of management Vicki Campbell, Program Manager,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:03 Nov 12, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1

Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:23:30
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:23:30

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Dates		Written comments on the changes to the Proposed Plan will be accepted until December 14, 2015.
Contact		Colleen Sievers, Project Manager,
FR Citation		80 FR 70253

80 FR 70253 - Opportunity To Comment on Changes to the Nevada and California Greater Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment Carson City Field Office Consolidated Resource Management Plan and the Tonopah Field Office Resource Management Plan Amendment, Nevada

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBureau of Land Management

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 219 (November 13, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management