80_FR_73175 80 FR 72950 - Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Investigation Pursuant to Court Decision

80 FR 72950 - Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Investigation Pursuant to Court Decision

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 225 (November 23, 2015)

Page Range72950-72950
FR Document2015-29804

On October 5, 2015, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') issued its final judgment in Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States Consol. Court No. 13-00012\1\ sustaining the Department of Commerce's (``the Department'') final results of remand redetermination.\2\ Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), the Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's Final Determination and Amended Final Determination in the antidumping duty investigation of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (``solar cells''), from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''),\3\ and is amending its determination with respect to granting separate rates to three specific respondents: Tianwei New Energy (Chengdu) PV Module Co., Ltd. (``Tianwei New Energy''), Dongfang Electric (Yixing) MAGI Solar Power Technology Co., Ltd. (``Dongfang Electric''), and Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. (``Sumec Hardware''). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 225 (Monday, November 23, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 225 (Monday, November 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 72950]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29804]



[[Page 72950]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-979]


Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled 
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Investigation and 
Notice of Amended Final Determination of Investigation Pursuant to 
Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 5, 2015, the United States Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') issued its final judgment in Jiangsu Jiasheng 
Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States Consol. Court No. 
13-00012\1\ sustaining the Department of Commerce's (``the 
Department'') final results of remand redetermination.\2\ Consistent 
with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. 
Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. 
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond 
Sawblades''), the Department is notifying the public that the final 
judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's Final 
Determination and Amended Final Determination in the antidumping duty 
investigation of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not 
assembled into modules (``solar cells''), from the People's Republic of 
China (``PRC''),\3\ and is amending its determination with respect to 
granting separate rates to three specific respondents: Tianwei New 
Energy (Chengdu) PV Module Co., Ltd. (``Tianwei New Energy''), Dongfang 
Electric (Yixing) MAGI Solar Power Technology Co., Ltd. (``Dongfang 
Electric''), and Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. (``Sumec Hardware'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. v. 
United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00012, Slip Op. 15-113 (CIT 
October 5, 2015) (``Jiangsu II'').
    \2\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Order, Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. v. United 
States, Consol. Court No. 13-00012 (April 20, 2015) (``Remand 
Results'').
    \3\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Affirmative 
Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 77 FR 63791 
(October 17, 2012) (``Final Determination''); Crystalline Silicon 
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the 
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018 
(December 7, 2012) (``Amended Final Determination'') (collectively, 
``Investigation Final Determination'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance--International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482-
2769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Subsequent to the publication of the Amended Final Determination, 
SolarWorld Americas, Inc. filed a complaint with the CIT challenging, 
in part, the Department's determination that certain separate-rate 
applicants were eligible for a separate rate.
    On June 6, 2014, the United States requested a voluntary remand to 
reconsider and reevaluate its determination to grant a separate rate to 
four specific respondents: Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang Electric, Sumec 
Hardware, and Ningbo ETDZ Holdings Ltd. (``Ningbo ETDZ''). On November 
20, 2014, the CIT granted the Department's request for a voluntary 
remand.
    On April 20, 2015, the Department issued its Remand Results, in 
which the Department determined that Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang 
Electric, and Sumec Hardware did not meet the criteria for a separate 
rate, but that Ningbo ETDZ did meet the criteria for a separate rate.
    On October 5, 2015, the Court issued its decision in Jiangsu II 
sustaining the Department's Remand Results.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Jiangsu II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department must 
publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a 
Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries 
pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's October 5, 2015, 
judgment sustaining the Department's Remand Results to not grant 
separate rates to Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang Electric, and Sumec 
Hardware, constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in 
harmony with the Department's Investigation Final Determination. This 
notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
Timken. Accordingly, the Department will continue the suspension of 
liquidation of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the 
period of appeal, or if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court 
decision.

Amended Final Determination

    Because there is now a final court decision with respect to this 
case, the Department is amending its Investigation Final Determination 
with respect to granting separate rates to Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang 
Electric, and Sumec Hardware. We have found that Tianwei New Energy, 
Dongfang Electric, and Sumec Hardware do not meet the criteria for a 
separate rate. Accordingly, these companies are part of the PRC-wide 
entity. Additionally, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection to collect cash deposits from Tianwei New Energy, 
Dongfang Electric, and Sumec Hardware at the cash deposit rate 
applicable to the PRC-wide entity, effective October 15, 2015. The 
current cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity is 238.95 
percent.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Although the Department noted in the Remand Results that the 
cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity is 249.96 
percent, the current cash deposit rate, after adjusting for 
subsidies, is 238.95 percent. See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 
Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 80 FR 
40998, 41002 n.50 (July 14, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 735(d), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: November 17, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-29804 Filed 11-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                             72950                      Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 225 / Monday, November 23, 2015 / Notices

                                             DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Electric (Yixing) MAGI Solar Power                      requirements of Timken. Accordingly,
                                                                                                     Technology Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dongfang                        the Department will continue the
                                             International Trade Administration                      Electric’’), and Sumec Hardware & Tools                 suspension of liquidation of the subject
                                             [A–570–979]                                             Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sumec Hardware’’).                         merchandise pending the expiration of
                                                                                                     DATES: Effective Date: October 15, 2015.                the period of appeal, or if appealed,
                                             Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff                   pending a final and conclusive court
                                             Whether or Not Assembled Into                           Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office                     decision.
                                             Modules, From the People’s Republic                     IV, Enforcement and Compliance—                         Amended Final Determination
                                             of China: Notice of Court Decision Not                  International Trade Administration,
                                             in Harmony With Final Determination                                                                                Because there is now a final court
                                                                                                     U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
                                             of Investigation and Notice of                                                                                  decision with respect to this case, the
                                                                                                     Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                             Amended Final Determination of                                                                                  Department is amending its
                                                                                                     Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202)
                                             Investigation Pursuant to Court                                                                                 Investigation Final Determination with
                                                                                                     482–2769.
                                             Decision                                                                                                        respect to granting separate rates to
                                                                                                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang Electric,
                                             AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                           and Sumec Hardware. We have found
                                                                                                     Background
                                             International Trade Administration,                                                                             that Tianwei New Energy, Dongfang
                                             Department of Commerce.                                    Subsequent to the publication of the
                                                                                                                                                             Electric, and Sumec Hardware do not
                                             SUMMARY: On October 5, 2015, the                        Amended Final Determination,
                                                                                                                                                             meet the criteria for a separate rate.
                                             United States Court of International                    SolarWorld Americas, Inc. filed a
                                                                                                                                                             Accordingly, these companies are part
                                             Trade (‘‘CIT’’) issued its final judgment               complaint with the CIT challenging, in
                                                                                                                                                             of the PRC-wide entity. Additionally,
                                             in Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic                        part, the Department’s determination
                                                                                                                                                             the Department will instruct U.S.
                                             Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States                   that certain separate-rate applicants
                                                                                                                                                             Customs and Border Protection to
                                             Consol. Court No. 13–000121 sustaining                  were eligible for a separate rate.
                                                                                                                                                             collect cash deposits from Tianwei New
                                             the Department of Commerce’s (‘‘the                        On June 6, 2014, the United States
                                                                                                                                                             Energy, Dongfang Electric, and Sumec
                                             Department’’) final results of remand                   requested a voluntary remand to
                                                                                                                                                             Hardware at the cash deposit rate
                                             redetermination.2 Consistent with the                   reconsider and reevaluate its
                                                                                                                                                             applicable to the PRC-wide entity,
                                             decision of the United States Court of                  determination to grant a separate rate to
                                             Appeals for the Federal Circuit                                                                                 effective October 15, 2015. The current
                                                                                                     four specific respondents: Tianwei New
                                             (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United                                                                              cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC-
                                                                                                     Energy, Dongfang Electric, Sumec
                                             States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990)                                                                           wide entity is 238.95 percent.5
                                                                                                     Hardware, and Ningbo ETDZ Holdings
                                             (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond                                                                              This notice is issued and published in
                                                                                                     Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo ETDZ’’). On November
                                             Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United                                                                             accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
                                                                                                     20, 2014, the CIT granted the
                                             States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)                                                                          735(d), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                                                                     Department’s request for a voluntary
                                             (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the                            remand.                                                   Dated: November 17, 2015.
                                             Department is notifying the public that                    On April 20, 2015, the Department                    Paul Piquado,
                                             the final judgment in this case is not in               issued its Remand Results, in which the                 Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                             harmony with the Department’s Final                     Department determined that Tianwei                      Compliance.
                                             Determination and Amended Final                         New Energy, Dongfang Electric, and                      [FR Doc. 2015–29804 Filed 11–20–15; 8:45 am]
                                             Determination in the antidumping duty                   Sumec Hardware did not meet the                         BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                             investigation of crystalline silicon                    criteria for a separate rate, but that
                                             photovoltaic cells, whether or not                      Ningbo ETDZ did meet the criteria for
                                             assembled into modules (‘‘solar cells’’),               a separate rate.                                        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                             from the People’s Republic of China                        On October 5, 2015, the Court issued
                                             (‘‘PRC’’),3 and is amending its                         its decision in Jiangsu II sustaining the               National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                             determination with respect to granting                  Department’s Remand Results.4                           Administration
                                             separate rates to three specific
                                                                                                     Timken Notice                                           RIN 0648–XE320
                                             respondents: Tianwei New Energy
                                             (Chengdu) PV Module Co., Ltd.                              In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at               Caribbean Fishery Management
                                             (‘‘Tianwei New Energy’’), Dongfang                      341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,                 Council; Public Meeting
                                                                                                     the CAFC held that, pursuant to section
                                                1 See Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology
                                                                                                     516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                   AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                             Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13–       amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department                   Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
                                             00012, Slip Op. 15–113 (CIT October 5, 2015)                                                                    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                             (‘‘Jiangsu II’’).                                       must publish a notice of a court
                                                2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant      decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with                Commerce.
                                             to Court Order, Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic           a Department determination and must                     ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
                                             Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court    suspend liquidation of entries pending
                                             No. 13–00012 (April 20, 2015) (‘‘Remand Results’’).                                                             SUMMARY:   The Caribbean Fishery
                                                3 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
                                                                                                     a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
                                                                                                     October 5, 2015, judgment sustaining                    Management Council’s (Council)
                                             Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
                                             People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of      the Department’s Remand Results to not                  Scientific and Statistical Committee
                                             Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Affirmative          grant separate rates to Tianwei New
                                             Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in       Energy, Dongfang Electric, and Sumec                      5 Although the Department noted in the Remand
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                             Part, 77 FR 63791 (October 17, 2012) (‘‘Final                                                                   Results that the cash deposit rate applicable to the
                                             Determination’’); Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic      Hardware, constitutes a final decision of               PRC-wide entity is 249.96 percent, the current cash
                                             Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules,           that court that is not in harmony with                  deposit rate, after adjusting for subsidies, is 238.95
                                             From the People’s Republic of China: Amended            the Department’s Investigation Final                    percent. See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
                                             Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair          Determination. This notice is published                 Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the
                                             Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018                                                                  People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
                                             (December 7, 2012) (‘‘Amended Final                     in fulfillment of the publication                       Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
                                             Determination’’) (collectively, ‘‘Investigation Final                                                           Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012–2013,
                                             Determination’’).                                         4 See   Jiangsu II.                                   80 FR 40998, 41002 n.50 (July 14, 2015).



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:25 Nov 20, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00006     Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM   23NON1



Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:17:50
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:17:50
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: October 15, 2015.
ContactJeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance--International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482- 2769.
FR Citation80 FR 72950 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR