80 FR 73683 - Reactive Power Requirements for Non-Synchronous Generation
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 227 (November 25, 2015)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 227 (November 25, 2015)
| Page Range | 73683-73689 | |
| FR Document | 2015-29972 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 227 (Wednesday, November 25, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 73683-73689] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-29972] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 18 CFR Part 35 [Docket No. RM16-1-000] Reactive Power Requirements for Non-Synchronous Generation AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is proposing to eliminate the exemptions for wind generators from the requirement to provide reactive power. As a result, all newly interconnecting generators, including both synchronous and non- synchronous generators, would be required to provide reactive power. To implement this requirement, the Commission proposes to revise the pro forma Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA), Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA, and the pro forma Small Generator Interconnection Agreement (SGIA) in accordance with the Commission's regulations, which require every public utility with a non-discriminatory open access transmission tariff on file to also have on file the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA ``required by Commission rulemaking proceedings promulgating and amending such interconnection procedures and agreements.'' In this Proposal to Revise Standard Generator Interconnection Agreements (Proposal), the Commission proposes to modify both agreements to eliminate the exemptions for wind generators from the requirement to provide reactive power. As a result, all newly interconnecting generators (i.e., new generators seeking to interconnect to the transmission system and all existing non- synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests), both synchronous and non- synchronous, would be required to provide reactive power as a condition of interconnection as of the effective date of the final revision. DATES: Comments are due January 25, 2016. ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the following ways:Electronic Filing through http://www.ferc.gov. Documents created electronically using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. [[Page 73684]] Mail/Hand Delivery: Those unable to file electronically may mail or hand-deliver comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this process, see the Comment Procedures Section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Bak (Technical Information), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6574, [email protected] Gretchen Kershaw (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8213, [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Proposal To Revise Standard Generator Interconnection Agreements Issued November 19, 2015 1. In this Proposal to Revise Standard Generator Interconnection Agreements (Proposal), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is proposing to eliminate the exemptions for wind generators from the requirement to provide reactive power. As a result, all newly interconnecting generators, including both synchronous and non-synchronous, would be required to provide reactive power. Specifically, the Commission proposes to modify the two pro forma interconnection agreements, the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA) and the Small Generator Interconnection Agreement (SGIA), to eliminate the current exemption for wind generators from the requirement to provide reactive power, thereby requiring all newly interconnecting generators (i.e., new generators seeking to interconnect to the transmission system and all existing non- synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests), both synchronous and non- synchronous, to provide reactive power. This Proposal would create comparable reactive power requirements for non-synchronous and synchronous generators, except that the Proposal requires that non- synchronous generators maintain the required power factor range only when the generator's real power output exceeds 10 percent of its nameplate capacity. Additionally, all existing non-synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests would be required to provide reactive power. 2. The existing pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA both require, as a condition of interconnection, an interconnecting generator ``to design its generating facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor \1\ of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, or a different range if adopted by the Transmission Provider'' \2\ (i.e., the reactive power requirement). This reactive power requirement requires dynamic reactive power \3\ from generators. As discussed below, however, wind generators have been exempted from the reactive power requirement absent a study finding the provision of reactive power necessary, because historically, costs for an interconnection customer to design and build a wind generator that could provide reactive power were high and could have created an obstacle to the development of wind generation.\4\ However, due to technological advancements, wind generators can now provide reactive power more cheaply and the cost of providing reactive power no longer presents an obstacle to the development of wind generation.\5\ The subsequent decline in the cost to wind generators of providing reactive power may make it unduly discriminatory and preferential to exempt wind generators from the reactive power requirement when other types of generators are not exempt. Further, the growing penetration of wind generators on some systems increases the potential for a deficiency in reactive power.\6\ Given this potential, the Commission's current requirement that the transmission provider conduct a study to determine whether each new wind generator needs to provide reactive power may unduly place the burden of supplying reactive power on synchronous generators without a reasonable technological or cost-based basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The power factor of an alternating current transmission system is the ratio of real power to apparent power. Reliable operation of a transmission system requires system operators to maintain a tight control of voltages (at all points) on the transmission system. The ability to vary the ratio of real power to apparent power (i.e., adjust the power factor) allows system operators to maintain scheduled voltages within allowed for tolerances on the transmission system and maintain the reliability of the transmission system. The Commission established a required power factor range in Order No. 2003 of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging. See Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, Order No. 2003, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,146, at P 542 (2003), order on reh'g, Order No. 2003-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,160, order on reh'g, Order No. 2003-B, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,171 (2004), order on reh'g, Order No. 2003-C, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,190 (2005), aff'd sub nom. Nat'l Ass'n of Regulatory Util. Comm'rs v. FERC, 475 F.3d 1277 (D.C. Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1230 (2008). \2\ Section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA and section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA. \3\ Reactive power sources are generally categorized as static or dynamic based on the speed and continuity at which they can produce or absorb reactive power in response to changes in system conditions. In general, dynamic reactive power devices are characterized by faster acting and continuously variable voltage control capability. \4\ Interconnection for Wind Energy, Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,186, at P 51, order on reh'g, Order No. 661-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,198 (2005). \5\ Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, app. 2, at 1-3 (Apr. 22, 2014). \6\ See PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 151 FERC ] 61,097, at P 7 (2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Therefore, the Commission proposes to eliminate the existing exemptions for wind generators, and thereby require that all newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators provide dynamic reactive power as a condition of interconnection. This requirement would also apply to all existing non-synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests. The proposals set forth in this Proposal are intended to ensure that all generators, synchronous and non-synchronous, are treated in a not unduly discriminatory or preferential manner, as required by sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),\7\ and to ensure sufficient reactive power is available on the electric grid as more non- synchronous generators seek to interconnect. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 16 U.S.C. 824a, 824b (2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. The Commission seeks comment on these proposed reforms sixty (60) days after publication of this Proposal in the Federal Register. Background 5. Transmission providers require reactive power to control system voltage for efficient and reliable operation of an alternating current transmission system. At times, transmission providers need generators to either supply or consume reactive power. Starting with Order No. 888,\8\ which included provisions regarding reactive power from [[Page 73685]] generators as an ancillary service in Schedule 2 of the pro forma Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT), the Commission issued a series of orders intended to ensure that sufficient reactive power is available to maintain the reliability of the electric grid. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non- Discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities, Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,036 (1996), order on reh'g, Order No. 888-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,048, order on reh'g, Order No. 888-B, 81 FERC ] 61,248 (1997), order on reh'g, Order No. 888-C, 82 FERC ] 61,046 (1998), aff'd in relevant part sub nom. Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. FERC, 225 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2000), aff'd sub nom. New York v. FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Starting with Order No. 2003, the Commission adopted standard procedures and a standard agreement for the interconnection of large generation facilities (the pro forma LGIA), which included the reactive power requirement.\9\ The Commission recognized in Order No. 2003-A that the pro forma LGIA was ``designed around the needs of large synchronous generators and that generators relying on newer technologies may find that either a specific requirement is inapplicable or that it calls for a slightly different approach'' because such generators ``may have unique electrical characteristics.'' \10\ Therefore, the Commission exempted wind generators from the reactive power requirement and added a blank Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA as a placeholder for future interconnection requirements for newer technologies.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Order No. 2003, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,146 at PP 1, 542. \10\ Order No. 2003-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,160 at P 407 & n.85. \11\ Id. Article 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA provides: ``Interconnection Customer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless Transmission Provider has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the Control Area on a comparable basis. The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. In June 2005, the Commission issued Order No. 661,\12\ establishing interconnection requirements in Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA for large wind generators.\13\ Recognizing that, unlike traditional synchronous generators, wind generators had to ``install costly equipment'' in order to maintain reactive power capability, the Commission in Order No. 661 preserved the exemption for large wind generators from the reactive power requirement unless the transmission provider shows, through a System Impact Study, that reactive power capability is required to ensure safety or reliability.\14\ The Commission explained that this qualified exemption from the reactive power requirement for large wind generators would provide certainty to the industry and ``remove unnecessary obstacles to the increased growth of wind generation.'' \15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ Interconnection for Wind Energy, Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,186, Appendix B (Appendix G--Interconnection Requirements for a Wind Generating Plant), order on reh'g, Order No. 661-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,198 (2005). \13\ Id. P 1. \14\ Id. PP 50-51. Appendix G states: ``A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the Transmission Provider's System Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety and reliability.'' \15\ Id. P 50. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. In May 2005, the Commission issued Order No. 2006,\16\ in which it adopted standard procedures and a standard agreement for the interconnection of small generation facilities (pro forma SGIA).\17\ In Order No. 2006, the Commission completely exempted small wind generators from the reactive power requirement.\18\ The Commission reasoned that, similar to large wind generators, small wind generators would face increased costs to provide reactive power that could create an obstacle to the development of small wind generators. Additionally, the Commission reasoned that small wind generators would ``have minimal impact on the Transmission Provider's electric system'' and therefore the reliability requirements for large wind generators that were eventually imposed in Order No. 661 were not needed for small wind generators.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ Standardization of Small Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, Order No. 2006, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,180, Attachment F (Small Generator Interconnection Agreement), order on reh'g, Order No. 2006-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,196 (2005), order granting clarification, Order No. 2006-B, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,221 (2006). \17\ Id. P 1. \18\ Id. P 387. Section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA states: ``The Interconnection Customer shall design its Small Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless the Transmission Provider has established different requirements that apply to all similarly situated generators in the control area on a comparable basis. The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.'' \19\ Id. P 24. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Since the Commission provided these exemptions from the reactive power requirement for wind generators, the equipment needed for a wind generator to provide reactive power appears to have become more commercially available and less costly, such that the cost of installing equipment that is capable of providing reactive power is comparable to the costs of a traditional generator.\20\ Recognizing these factors, the Commission recently accepted a proposal by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to effectively remove the wind generator exemption from the PJM tariff.\21\ Specifically, the Commission granted PJM an ``independent entity variation'' from Order No. 661 in accepting PJM's proposal to require interconnection customers seeking to interconnect non-synchronous generators,\22\ including wind generators, to use ``enhanced inverters'' with the capability to provide reactive power.\23\ The Commission observed that, ``[a]lthough there are still technical differences between non-synchronous generators [such as wind generators] and traditional generators, with regard to the provision of reactive power, those differences have significantly diminished since the Commission issued Order No. 661.'' \24\ The Commission agreed with PJM ``that the technology has changed both in availability and in cost since the Commission rejected [the California Independent System Operator's] proposal in 2010,'' such that ``PJM's proposal will not present a barrier to non-synchronous resources.'' \25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, app. 1, at 6, app. 2, at 4-5 (Apr. 22, 2014). \21\ PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 151 FERC ] 61,097, at P 28 (2015). \22\ Non-synchronous generators are ``connected to the bulk power system through power electronics, but do not produce power at system frequency (60 Hz).'' They ``do not operate in the same way as traditional generators and respond differently to network disturbances.'' Id. P 1 n.3 (citing Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,198 at P 3 n.4). Wind and solar photovoltaic generators are two examples of non-synchronous generators. \23\ Id. PP 1, 6. \24\ Id. P 28. \25\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion 10. The continued exemption from the reactive power requirement in the pro forma LGIA and the pro forma SGIA for newly interconnecting wind generators appears to be unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory or preferential. Older wind turbine generators consumed reactive power; however, they lacked the capability to produce and control reactive power without the use of costly equipment because they did not use inverters like other non-synchronous generators.\26\ Technological advances have been made in the inverters used by wind generators.\27\ Based on these improvements, requiring newly interconnecting wind generators to provide reactive power does not appear to be the obstacle to the development of [[Page 73686]] wind generation that it was when the Commission issued Order Nos. 2003, 661, and 2006.\28\ In particular, the wind turbines being installed today are generally Type III and Type IV inverter-based turbines,\29\ which are capable of producing and controlling dynamic reactive power, which was not the case in 2005 when the Commission exempted wind generators from the reactive power requirement in Order No. 661.\30\ The Commission preliminarily concludes that improvements in technology and the corresponding declining costs to newly interconnecting wind generators in providing reactive power make it unduly discriminatory and preferential to exempt such non-synchronous generators from the reactive power requirement when other types of generators are not exempt. Given the reduced costs to newly interconnecting wind generators to provide reactive power, requiring them to operate within the required power factor range would ensure they satisfy the same requirements as other generators and satisfy a basic requirement of interconnection.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,186 at PP 50-51. \27\ Non-synchronous generators produce electricity that is not synchronized to the electric grid (i.e., direct current (DC) power or alternating current (AC) power at a frequency other than 60 hertz). Inverters convert non-synchronized AC or DC power into synchronized AC power that can be transmitted on the transmission system. \28\ As discussed above, in exempting wind generators from the reactive power requirement, the Commission sought to avoid creating an obstacle to the development of wind generation. For example, in Order No. 661, the Commission was concerned with ``remov[ing] unnecessary obstacles to the increased growth of wind generation.'' Id. P 50. \29\ A Type III wind turbine is a non-synchronous wound-rotor generator that has a three phase AC field applied to the rotor from a partially-rated power-electronics converter. A Type IV wind turbine is an AC generator in which the stator windings are connected to the power system through a fully-rated power- electronics converter. Both Type III and Type IV wind turbines have inherent reactive power capabilities. \30\ Id. PP 50-51. \31\ See, e.g., Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 119 FERC ] 61,199, at P 29 (``Providing reactive power within the [standard power factor range] is an obligation of a generator, and is as much an obligation of a generator as, for example, operating in accordance with Good Utility Practice.''), order on reh'g, 121 FERC ] 61,196 (2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Further, the Commission is concerned that, as the penetration of wind generation continues to grow, exempting a class of generators from providing reactive power could create reliability issues if those generators represent a substantial amount of total generation, or if many of the resources that currently provide reactive power are retired from operation. Local reliability issues, due to the short distances that reactive power can be transmitted, that are not readily apparent given the current generation mix could result if a region were to lose synchronous resources that supply reactive power and the resulting generation mix consisted of a significant quantity of resources that were exempt from providing reactive power. Further, the Commission believes that maintaining this exemption may unduly place the burden of supplying reactive power on synchronous generators without a reasonable technological or cost-based distinction between synchronous and non- synchronous generators.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ See PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 151 FERC ] 61,097, at P 7 (2015); Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, app. 1 (Apr. 22, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Therefore, the Commission preliminarily concludes that the continued exemption from the reactive power requirement for newly interconnecting wind generators is unjust and unreasonable and unduly discriminatory and preferential. The Commission, therefore, proposes to revise the pro forma LGIA, Appendix G of the pro forma LGIA, and the pro forma SGIA to eliminate the exemptions for wind generators from the reactive power requirement.\33\ Under this Proposal, newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators would be eligible for the same payments for reactive power as other generators.\34\ Any compensation would be based on the cost of providing reactive power. We note that the cost to a wind generator of providing reactive power may not be easily estimated using existing methods that are applied to synchronous generators.\35\ The Commission also proposes that transmission providers that are not public utilities will have to adopt the requirements of this Proposal as a condition of maintaining the status of their safe harbor tariff or otherwise satisfying the reciprocity requirement of Order No. 888.\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ The Commission does not propose to revise any regulatory text. The Commission proposes to revise the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA in accordance with section 35.28(f)(1) of the Commission's regulations, which provides: ``Every public utility that is required to have on file a non-discriminatory open access transmission tariff under this section must amend such tariff by adding the standard interconnection procedures and agreement and the standard small generator interconnection procedures and agreement required by Commission rulemaking proceedings promulgating and amending such interconnection procedures and agreements, or such other interconnection procedures and agreements as may be required by Commission rulemaking proceedings promulgating and amending the standard interconnection procedures and agreement and the standard small generator interconnection procedures and agreement.'' 18 CFR 35.28(f)(1) (2015). See Integration of Variable Energy Resources, Order No. 764, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,331, at PP 343-345 (adopting this regulatory text effective September 11, 2012), order on reh'g and clarification, Order No. 764-A, 141 FERC ] 61,232 (2012), order on clarification and reh'g, Order No. 764-B, 144 FERC ] 61,222 (2013). While not revising regulatory text, the Commission is using the process provided for rulemaking proceedings, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(4)-(5) (2012). \34\ Order No. 2003-A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,160 at P 416. \35\ See Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, app. 2 (Apr. 22, 2014). \36\ Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,036 at 31,760-63. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. Removing the exemptions for wind generators from the reactive power requirement would specifically require all newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators, and all existing non-synchronous generators proposing upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests, to design their generating facilities to maintain reactive power within a power factor range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, or the standard range established by the transmission provider and approved by the Commission, to be measured at the Point of Interconnection.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ The pro forma LGIA defines ``Point of Interconnection'' as ``the point, as set forth in Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement, where the Interconnection Facilities connect to the Transmission Provider's Transmission System.'' Similarly, the pro forma SGIA defines ``Point of Interconnection'' as ``[t]he point where the Interconnection Facilities connect with the Transmission Provider's Transmission System.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. The Commission also proposes to require that the reactive power capability installed by non-synchronous generators be dynamic. In Order No. 661, the Commission declined to require dynamic reactive power capability from wind generators, unless the System Impact Study showed that dynamic reactive power capability was needed for system reliability, reasoning that dynamic reactive power capability may not be needed in every case.\38\ Based on technological advancements, the Commission no longer believes it is just and reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential to exempt wind generators from the requirement to provide dynamic reactive power.\39\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ See Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,186 at P 66. \39\ Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, at 7 (Apr. 22, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15. Further, the Commission proposes to require that newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators be required to design the generating facility to maintain the required power factor range only when the generator's real power output exceeds 10 percent of its nameplate capacity.\40\ In requiring a generator to provide reactive power, the interconnection agreements would state: ``Non-synchronous generators shall only be required to maintain the above power factor when their output is above 10 [[Page 73687]] percent of the Generating Facility Capacity.'' The Commission's understanding is that the inverters used by non-synchronous generators are not capable of producing reactive power when operating below 10 percent of nameplate capacity.\41\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ See Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,186 at P 46. \41\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16. Specifically, with deleted text in brackets and added text in italics, the Commission proposes to revise section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA to read: Interconnection Customer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless Transmission Provider has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the Control Area on a comparable basis. [The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.] Non-synchronous generators shall only be required to maintain the above power factor when their output is above 10 percent of the Generating Facility Capacity.\42\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ Section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA. The Commission similarly proposes to revise section 1.8.1 of the --------------------------------------------------------------------------- pro forma SGIA to read: The Interconnection Customer shall design its Small Generating Facility to maintain a composite power delivery at continuous rated power output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless the Transmission Provider has established different requirements that apply to all similarly situated generators in the control area on a comparable basis. [The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.] Non-synchronous generators shall only be required to maintain the above power factor when their output is above 10 percent of the generator nameplate capacity.\43\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \43\ Section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA. In addition, the Commission would strike paragraph A.ii of Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA, ``Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generation Plant.'' \44\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ The full text of the pro forma LGIA will be posted on the Commission's internet page at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/gi/stnd-gen.asp. The full text of the pro forma SGIA will be posted on the Commission's internet page at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/gi/small-gen.asp. A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the Transmission Provider's System Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standard can be met by using, for example, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability 606 (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Transmission Provider, or a combination of the two. The Interconnection Customer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.\45\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ Section A.ii of Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA. 17. The Commission proposes to apply the reactive power requirement to all newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators, as well as all existing non-synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests, as of the effective date of the final revision. The Commission also proposes to apply the reactive power requirement to all newly interconnecting non- synchronous generators that have requested that an LGIA or SGIA be filed unexecuted with the Commission that is still pending before the Commission as of the effective date of the final revision. Thus, the requirement would not apply to non-synchronous generators that have executed an LGIA or SGIA, as relevant, prior to the effective date of the final revision, unless they propose upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests. Given that not all existing wind generators are capable of providing reactive power without incurring substantial costs to install new equipment, we do not believe it is reasonable or necessary to require those generators to provide reactive power. However, existing wind generators that make upgrades to their generation facility that require a new interconnection request will be required to conform to this new requirement. 18. The Commission seeks comments on the Proposal to remove the exemptions for wind generators from the reactive power requirement. Further, the Commission seeks comments on whether the current power factor range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, as set forth in the existing pro forma interconnection agreements,\46\ is reasonable given the technology used by non-synchronous generators. The Commission also seeks comments on the proposed requirement that newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators only be required to produce reactive power when the generator's real power output is greater than 10 percent of nameplate capacity. And finally, we note that a non-synchronous generator will be eligible for compensation for reactive power, consistent with the compensation provisions of the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA.\47\ The Commission seeks comment on whether the existing methods used to determine reactive power compensation are appropriate for wind generators and, if not, what alternatives would be appropriate.\48\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ Section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA and section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA. \47\ Section 9.6.3 of the pro forma LGIA and section 1.8.2 of the pro forma SGIA. \48\ See Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14-7, app. 1 (Apr. 22, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Compliance Procedures 19. To comply with the requirements of this Proposal, the Commission proposes to require each public utility \49\ transmission provider to submit a compliance filing within 90 days of the effective date of the final revision in this proceeding revising its pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA subject to the Commission's jurisdiction as necessary to demonstrate that it meets the requirements set forth in this Proposal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \49\ For purposes of this Proposal, a public utility is a utility that owns, controls, or operates facilities used for transmitting electric energy in interstate commerce, as defined by the FPA. See 16 U.S.C. 824(e) (2012). A non-public utility that seeks voluntary compliance with the reciprocity condition of an OATT may satisfy that condition by filing an OATT, which includes the pro forma LGIA and SGIA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. In some cases, public utility transmission providers may have provisions in their currently effective pro forma LGIAs and pro forma SGIAs related to the provision of reactive power by non-synchronous generators that the Commission has deemed to be consistent with or superior to the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA. Where these pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA provisions will be modified by the final revision, public utility transmission providers must either comply with the final revision or demonstrate that these previously-approved pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA variations continue to be consistent with or superior to the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA as modified by the final revision. 21. The Commission will assess whether each compliance filing satisfies the proposed requirements and principles stated above and issue additional orders as necessary to ensure that each public utility transmission provider meets the requirements of this Proposal and the subsequent final revision. 22. The Commission proposes that transmission providers that are not [[Page 73688]] public utilities will have to adopt the requirements of this Proposal and subsequent final revision as a condition of maintaining the status of their safe harbor tariff or otherwise satisfying the reciprocity requirement of Order No. 888.\50\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 31,036 at 31,760-63. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Information Collection Statement 23. The collection of information contained in this Proposal to Revise Standard Generator Interconnection Agreements is subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).\51\ OMB's regulations require approval of certain informational collection requirements imposed by an agency.\52\ Upon approval of a collection(s) of information, OMB will assign an OMB control number and an expiration date. Respondents subject to the filing requirements will not be penalized for failing to respond to these collections of information unless the collections of information display a valid OMB control number. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \51\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) (2012). \52\ 5 CFR 1320.11 (2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24. The reforms proposed in this Proposal would amend the Commission's standard generator interconnection agreements in accordance with section 35.28(f)(1) of the Commission's regulations \53\ to require that each public utility transmission provider amend its pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA to: (1) Eliminate the exemptions for wind generators from the requirement to provide reactive power; and (2) require that all newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators, as well as all existing non-synchronous generators making upgrades to their generation facilities that require new interconnection requests, provide reactive power as a condition of interconnection, as of the effective date of the final revision. The reforms proposed in this Proposal would require filings of pro forma LGIAs and pro forma SGIAs with the Commission. The Commission anticipates the reforms proposed in this Proposal, once implemented, would not significantly change currently existing burdens on an ongoing basis. With regard to those public utility transmission providers that believe that they already comply with the reforms proposed in this Proposal, they could demonstrate their compliance in the filing required 90 days after the effective date of the final revision in this proceeding. The Commission will submit the proposed reporting requirements to OMB for its review and approval under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act.\54\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \53\ 18 CFR 35.28(f)(1) (2015). \54\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) (2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25. While the Commission expects the adoption of the reforms proposed in this Proposal to provide significant benefits, the Commission understands that implementation can be a complex and costly endeavor. The Commission solicits comments on the accuracy of provided burden and cost estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing the respondents' burdens. Burden Estimate and Information Collection Costs: The Commission believes that the burden estimates below are representative of the average burden on respondents. The estimated burden and cost \55\ for the requirements contained in this Proposal follow. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \55\ The estimates for cost per response are derived using the following formula: Average Burden Hours per Response * $72 per Hour = Average Cost per Response. The hourly cost figure comes from the FERC average salary of $149,489. Subject matter experts found that industry employment costs closely resemble FERC's regarding the FERC-516 information collection. Data Collection--FERC 516 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Annual number applicable of responses Total number Average burden (hours) and Total annual burden hours and registered per of responses cost per response \56\ total annual cost entities respondent (1) (2) (1)*(2)=(3) (4)........................... (3)*(4)=(5) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conforming LGIA changes to incorporate 132 1 132 7.5........................... 990 hours. proposed revisions. $540.00....................... $71,280.00. Conforming SGIA changes to incorporate 132 1 132 7.5........................... 990 hours. proposed revisions. $540.00....................... $71,280.00. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total............................... .............. .............. 264 15 hours...................... 1,980 hours. $1,080........................ $142,560.00. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost to Comply: The Commission has projected the total cost of compliance as follows: \57\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ $149,489/$2,080 = $71.8697 and is rounded to $72.00 per hour. \57\ The costs for Year 1 would consist of filing proposed changes to the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA with the Commission within 90 days of the effective date of the final revision plus initial implementation. The Commission does not expect any ongoing costs beyond the initial compliance in Year 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year 1: $142,560 ($1,080/utility) Year 2: $0 After Year 1, the reforms proposed in this Proposal, once implemented, would not significantly change existing burdens on an ongoing basis. Title: FERC-516, Electric Rate Schedules and Tariff Filings. Action: Proposed revisions to an information collection. OMB Control No.: 1902-0096. Respondents for This Proposal: Businesses or other for profit and/ or not-for-profit institutions. Frequency of Information: One-time during year one. Necessity of Information: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission makes this Proposal to improve the reliability of the electric grid by requiring all newly interconnecting non-synchronous generators to provide reactive power and to ensure that all generators are being treated in a not unduly discriminatory or preferential manner. Internal Review: The Commission has reviewed the proposed changes and has determined that such changes are necessary. These requirements conform to the Commission's need for efficient information collection, communication, and management within the energy industry. The Commission has specific, objective support for the burden estimates associated with the information collection requirements. 26. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting requirements by contacting the [[Page 73689]] following: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office of the Executive Director], email: [email protected], phone: (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873. Comments concerning the collection of information and the associated burden estimate(s), may also be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, phone: (202) 395-0710, fax: (202) 395-7285]. Due to security concerns, comments should be sent electronically to the following email address: [email protected]. Comments submitted to OMB should include FERC-516 and OMB Control No. 1902-0096. Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 27. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \58\ generally requires a description and analysis of rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA does not mandate any particular outcome in a rulemaking. It only requires consideration of alternatives that are less burdensome to small entities and an agency explanation of why alternatives were rejected. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \58\ 5 U.S.C. 601-12 (2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 28. To the extent the RFA applies to this proceeding, the Commission estimates that the total number of public utility transmission providers that would have to modify their currently effective pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA is 132. Of these, the Commission estimates the total number that are small entities is 11. The Commission estimates the average total cost of these entities will be minimal, requiring on average 15 hours, or $1,080 in expenses. The Commission does not consider this to be a significant economic impact. As a result, the Commission certifies that the reforms proposed in this Proposal would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Environmental Analysis 29. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant adverse effect on the human environment.\59\ The Commission concludes that neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is required for this Proposal under section 380.4(a)(15) of the Commission's regulations, which provides a categorical exemption for approval of actions under sections 205 and 206 of the FPA relating to the filing of schedules containing all rates and charges for the transmission or sale of electric energy subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, plus the classification, practices, contracts and regulations that affect rates, charges, classifications, and services.\60\ The revisions proposed in this Proposal would update and clarify the application of the Commission's standard interconnection requirements to wind generators. Therefore, this Proposal falls within the categorical exemptions provided in the Commission's regulations, and as a result neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment is required. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs., Regulations Preambles 1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987). \60\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(15) (2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment Procedures 30. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on the matters and issues proposed in this Proposal to be adopted, including any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. Comments are due January 25, 2016. Comments must refer to Docket No. RM16-1-000, and must include the commenter's name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and their address. 31. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically via the eFiling link on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing formats. Documents created electronically using word processing software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. 32. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically must send an original of their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. 33. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the Document Availability section below. Commenters on this Proposal are not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters. Document Availability 34. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the Internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. 35. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number of this document, excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field. 36. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's Web site during normal business hours from the Commission's Online Support at (202) 502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at [email protected], or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502- 8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at [email protected]. List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 35 Electric power rates, Electric utilities, Non-discriminatory open access transmission tariffs. By direction of the Commission. Issued: November 19, 2015 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-29972 Filed 11-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules 73683
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under (ECIs) of the centrifugal compressor DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
the DOT Regulatory Policies and (inducer). Use Accomplishment Instructions,
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, paragraph 6.B.(1)(b) of Turbomeca S.A. Alert Federal Energy Regulatory
Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. A249 Commission
1979), 72 0100 Version H, dated May 21, 2015 to do
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation the inspections. Use Appendix 1 of
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies Turbomeca S.A. Alert MSB No. A249 72 0100 18 CFR Part 35
making a regulatory distinction, and Version H, dated May 21, 2015 for the [Docket No. RM16–1–000]
(4) Will not have a significant schedule of inspections.
economic impact, positive or negative, (3) Perform initial and repetitive borescope Reactive Power Requirements for Non-
on a substantial number of small entities inspections (BSIs) of the centrifugal Synchronous Generation
compressor inducer. Use Accomplishment
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Instructions, paragraphs 6.B.(1)(a) of AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Turbomeca S.A. Alert MSB No. A249 72 0100 Commission.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Version H, dated May 21, 2015 to do the
ACTION: Proposed rule.
inspections. Use Appendix 1 of Turbomeca
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation S.A. Alert MSB No. A249 72 0100 Version H, SUMMARY: The Federal Energy
safety, Incorporation by reference, dated May 21, 2015 for the schedule of
Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
Safety. inspections.
(4) If, during any inspection required by proposing to eliminate the exemptions
The Proposed Amendment paragraphs (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this AD, any for wind generators from the
crack, corrosion, or other damage is detected requirement to provide reactive power.
Accordingly, under the authority
on the inducer, then before next flight, As a result, all newly interconnecting
delegated to me by the Administrator, replace the centrifugal compressor. generators, including both synchronous
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (5) Accomplishment of a UI or ECI of the and non-synchronous generators, would
39 as follows: centrifugal compressor inducer, required by be required to provide reactive power.
paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, is acceptable in
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS lieu of a BSI required by paragraph (e)(3) of
To implement this requirement, the
DIRECTIVES this AD for that engine. Commission proposes to revise the pro
(6) Replacement of a centrifugal forma Large Generator Interconnection
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 compressor required by paragraph (e)(4) of Agreement (LGIA), Appendix G to the
continues to read as follows: this AD, does not constitute terminating pro forma LGIA, and the pro forma
action for the repetitive inspections required Small Generator Interconnection
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. by paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(3) of this AD. Agreement (SGIA) in accordance with
§ 39.13 [Amended] (f) Credit for Previous Actions the Commission’s regulations, which
You may take credit for the inspections require every public utility with a non-
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by discriminatory open access transmission
removing airworthiness directive (AD) and corrective actions required by paragraph
(e)(2) and (e)(3) of this AD if you performed tariff on file to also have on file the pro
2006–23–17, Amendment 39–14829 (71 the inspections and corrective actions before forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA
FR 66664, November 16, 2006) (‘‘2006– the effective date of this AD, using ‘‘required by Commission rulemaking
23–17’’), and adding the following new Turbomeca S.A. Alert MSB No. A249 72 proceedings promulgating and
AD: 0100, Version G, or an earlier version. amending such interconnection
Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA–2006– (g) Alternative Methods of Compliance procedures and agreements.’’ In this
25970; Directorate Identifier 99–NE–12– (AMOCs) Proposal to Revise Standard Generator
AD. Interconnection Agreements (Proposal),
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
(a) Comments Due Date FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the Commission proposes to modify
The FAA must receive comments on this the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to both agreements to eliminate the
AD action by January 25, 2016. make your request. You may email your exemptions for wind generators from
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. the requirement to provide reactive
(b) Affected ADs power. As a result, all newly
(h) Related Information
This AD replaces AD 2006–23–17. interconnecting generators (i.e., new
(1) For more information about this AD,
(c) Applicability contact Wego Wang, Aerospace Engineer, generators seeking to interconnect to the
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & transmission system and all existing
This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Turmo
IV A and IV C turboshaft engines. Propeller Directorate, 12 New England non-synchronous generators making
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; upgrades to their generation facilities
(d) Unsafe Condition phone: 781–238–7134; fax: 781–238–7199; that require new interconnection
This AD was prompted by a centrifugal email: wego.wang@faa.gov. requests), both synchronous and non-
compressor inducer blade loss. We are (2) For service information identified in synchronous, would be required to
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the this AD, contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220
provide reactive power as a condition of
centrifugal compressor inducer, which could Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74 40 00;
fax: 33 (0)5 59 74 45 15. interconnection as of the effective date
lead to an uncontained blade release, damage of the final revision.
to the engine, and damage to the airplane. (3) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, DATES: Comments are due January 25,
(e) Compliance 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 2016.
Comply with this AD within the MA. For information on the availability of
ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
compliance times specified, unless already this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
docket number, may be filed in the
done. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on following ways:
(1) Remove the TU 197 and TU 215 November 18, 2015. • Electronic Filing through http://
standard centrifugal compressors and install Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
the TU 224 standard centrifugal compressor, www.ferc.gov. Documents created
Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller electronically using word processing
within 30 days after the effective date of this
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. software should be filed in native
AD.
(2) Perform initial and repetitive ultrasonic [FR Doc. 2015–29886 Filed 11–24–15; 8:45 am] applications or print-to-PDF format and
inspections (UIs) or eddy current inspections BILLING CODE 4910–13–P not in a scanned format.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Nov 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_73910/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules 73685
generators as an ancillary service in Commission explained that this generator exemption from the PJM
Schedule 2 of the pro forma Open qualified exemption from the reactive tariff.21 Specifically, the Commission
Access Transmission Tariff (OATT), the power requirement for large wind granted PJM an ‘‘independent entity
Commission issued a series of orders generators would provide certainty to variation’’ from Order No. 661 in
intended to ensure that sufficient the industry and ‘‘remove unnecessary accepting PJM’s proposal to require
reactive power is available to maintain obstacles to the increased growth of interconnection customers seeking to
the reliability of the electric grid. wind generation.’’ 15 interconnect non-synchronous
6. Starting with Order No. 2003, the 8. In May 2005, the Commission generators,22 including wind generators,
Commission adopted standard issued Order No. 2006,16 in which it to use ‘‘enhanced inverters’’ with the
procedures and a standard agreement adopted standard procedures and a capability to provide reactive power.23
for the interconnection of large standard agreement for the The Commission observed that,
generation facilities (the pro forma interconnection of small generation ‘‘[a]lthough there are still technical
LGIA), which included the reactive facilities (pro forma SGIA).17 In Order differences between non-synchronous
power requirement.9 The Commission No. 2006, the Commission completely generators [such as wind generators]
recognized in Order No. 2003–A that the exempted small wind generators from and traditional generators, with regard
pro forma LGIA was ‘‘designed around the reactive power requirement.18 The to the provision of reactive power, those
the needs of large synchronous Commission reasoned that, similar to differences have significantly
generators and that generators relying large wind generators, small wind diminished since the Commission
on newer technologies may find that generators would face increased costs to issued Order No. 661.’’ 24 The
either a specific requirement is provide reactive power that could create Commission agreed with PJM ‘‘that the
inapplicable or that it calls for a slightly an obstacle to the development of small technology has changed both in
different approach’’ because such wind generators. Additionally, the availability and in cost since the
generators ‘‘may have unique electrical Commission reasoned that small wind Commission rejected [the California
characteristics.’’ 10 Therefore, the generators would ‘‘have minimal impact Independent System Operator’s]
Commission exempted wind generators on the Transmission Provider’s electric proposal in 2010,’’ such that ‘‘PJM’s
from the reactive power requirement system’’ and therefore the reliability proposal will not present a barrier to
and added a blank Appendix G to the requirements for large wind generators non-synchronous resources.’’ 25
pro forma LGIA as a placeholder for that were eventually imposed in Order Discussion
future interconnection requirements for No. 661 were not needed for small wind
newer technologies.11 generators.19 10. The continued exemption from
7. In June 2005, the Commission 9. Since the Commission provided the reactive power requirement in the
issued Order No. 661,12 establishing these exemptions from the reactive pro forma LGIA and the pro forma SGIA
interconnection requirements in power requirement for wind generators, for newly interconnecting wind
Appendix G to the pro forma LGIA for the equipment needed for a wind generators appears to be unjust,
large wind generators.13 Recognizing generator to provide reactive power unreasonable, and unduly
that, unlike traditional synchronous appears to have become more discriminatory or preferential. Older
generators, wind generators had to commercially available and less costly, wind turbine generators consumed
‘‘install costly equipment’’ in order to such that the cost of installing reactive power; however, they lacked
maintain reactive power capability, the equipment that is capable of providing the capability to produce and control
Commission in Order No. 661 preserved reactive power is comparable to the reactive power without the use of costly
the exemption for large wind generators costs of a traditional generator.20 equipment because they did not use
from the reactive power requirement Recognizing these factors, the inverters like other non-synchronous
unless the transmission provider shows, Commission recently accepted a generators.26 Technological advances
through a System Impact Study, that proposal by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. have been made in the inverters used by
reactive power capability is required to wind generators.27 Based on these
(PJM) to effectively remove the wind
ensure safety or reliability.14 The improvements, requiring newly
Impact Study shows that such a requirement is
interconnecting wind generators to
9 Order No. 2003, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,146 at necessary to ensure safety and reliability.’’ provide reactive power does not appear
PP 1, 542. 15 Id. P 50. to be the obstacle to the development of
10 Order No. 2003–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. 16 Standardization of Small Generator
¶ 31,160 at P 407 & n.85. Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, Order 21 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 151 FERC
11 Id. Article 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA No. 2006, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,180, Attachment ¶ 61,097, at P 28 (2015).
provides: ‘‘Interconnection Customer shall design F (Small Generator Interconnection Agreement), 22 Non-synchronous generators are ‘‘connected to
the Large Generating Facility to maintain a order on reh’g, Order No. 2006–A, FERC Stats. & the bulk power system through power electronics,
composite power delivery at continuous rated Regs. ¶ 31,196 (2005), order granting clarification, but do not produce power at system frequency (60
power output at the Point of Interconnection at a Order No. 2006–B, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,221 Hz).’’ They ‘‘do not operate in the same way as
power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to (2006). traditional generators and respond differently to
0.95 lagging, unless Transmission Provider has 17 Id. P 1. network disturbances.’’ Id. P 1 n.3 (citing Order No.
established different requirements that apply to all 18 Id. P 387. Section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,198 at P 3 n.4). Wind
generators in the Control Area on a comparable states: ‘‘The Interconnection Customer shall design and solar photovoltaic generators are two examples
basis. The requirements of this paragraph shall not its Small Generating Facility to maintain a of non-synchronous generators.
apply to wind generators.’’ composite power delivery at continuous rated 23 Id. PP 1, 6.
12 Interconnection for Wind Energy, Order No. power output at the Point of Interconnection at a 24 Id. P 28.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,186, Appendix B power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 25 Id.
(Appendix G—Interconnection Requirements for a 0.95 lagging, unless the Transmission Provider has 26 Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,186 at
Wind Generating Plant), order on reh’g, Order No. established different requirements that apply to all PP 50–51.
661–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,198 (2005). similarly situated generators in the control area on 27 Non-synchronous generators produce
13 Id. P 1. a comparable basis. The requirements of this electricity that is not synchronized to the electric
14 Id. PP 50–51. Appendix G states: ‘‘A wind paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.’’ grid (i.e., direct current (DC) power or alternating
19 Id. P 24.
generating plant shall maintain a power factor current (AC) power at a frequency other than 60
within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, 20 Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff hertz). Inverters convert non-synchronized AC or
measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined Report, Docket No. AD14–7, app. 1, at 6, app. 2, at DC power into synchronized AC power that can be
in this LGIA, if the Transmission Provider’s System 4–5 (Apr. 22, 2014). transmitted on the transmission system.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_73910/page/3.svg)
![73686 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules
wind generation that it was when the quantity of resources that were exempt that are not public utilities will have to
Commission issued Order Nos. 2003, from providing reactive power. Further, adopt the requirements of this Proposal
661, and 2006.28 In particular, the wind the Commission believes that as a condition of maintaining the status
turbines being installed today are maintaining this exemption may unduly of their safe harbor tariff or otherwise
generally Type III and Type IV inverter- place the burden of supplying reactive satisfying the reciprocity requirement of
based turbines,29 which are capable of power on synchronous generators Order No. 888.36
producing and controlling dynamic without a reasonable technological or 13. Removing the exemptions for
reactive power, which was not the case cost-based distinction between wind generators from the reactive power
in 2005 when the Commission synchronous and non-synchronous requirement would specifically require
exempted wind generators from the generators.32 all newly interconnecting non-
reactive power requirement in Order 12. Therefore, the Commission synchronous generators, and all existing
No. 661.30 The Commission preliminarily concludes that the non-synchronous generators proposing
preliminarily concludes that continued exemption from the reactive upgrades to their generation facilities
improvements in technology and the power requirement for newly that require new interconnection
corresponding declining costs to newly interconnecting wind generators is requests, to design their generating
interconnecting wind generators in unjust and unreasonable and unduly facilities to maintain reactive power
providing reactive power make it discriminatory and preferential. The within a power factor range of 0.95
unduly discriminatory and preferential Commission, therefore, proposes to leading to 0.95 lagging, or the standard
to exempt such non-synchronous revise the pro forma LGIA, Appendix G range established by the transmission
generators from the reactive power of the pro forma LGIA, and the pro provider and approved by the
requirement when other types of forma SGIA to eliminate the exemptions Commission, to be measured at the
generators are not exempt. Given the for wind generators from the reactive Point of Interconnection.37
reduced costs to newly interconnecting power requirement.33 Under this 14. The Commission also proposes to
wind generators to provide reactive Proposal, newly interconnecting non- require that the reactive power
power, requiring them to operate within synchronous generators would be capability installed by non-synchronous
the required power factor range would eligible for the same payments for generators be dynamic. In Order No.
ensure they satisfy the same reactive power as other generators.34 661, the Commission declined to require
requirements as other generators and Any compensation would be based on dynamic reactive power capability from
satisfy a basic requirement of the cost of providing reactive power. We wind generators, unless the System
interconnection.31 note that the cost to a wind generator of Impact Study showed that dynamic
11. Further, the Commission is providing reactive power may not be reactive power capability was needed
concerned that, as the penetration of easily estimated using existing methods for system reliability, reasoning that
wind generation continues to grow, that are applied to synchronous dynamic reactive power capability may
exempting a class of generators from generators.35 The Commission also not be needed in every case.38 Based on
providing reactive power could create proposes that transmission providers technological advancements, the
reliability issues if those generators Commission no longer believes it is just
represent a substantial amount of total 32 See PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 151 FERC and reasonable and not unduly
generation, or if many of the resources ¶ 61,097, at P 7 (2015); Payment for Reactive Power, discriminatory or preferential to exempt
that currently provide reactive power Commission Staff Report, Docket No. AD14–7, app. wind generators from the requirement to
1 (Apr. 22, 2014).
are retired from operation. Local 33 The Commission does not propose to revise any
provide dynamic reactive power.39
reliability issues, due to the short regulatory text. The Commission proposes to revise
15. Further, the Commission proposes
distances that reactive power can be the pro forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA in to require that newly interconnecting
transmitted, that are not readily accordance with section 35.28(f)(1) of the non-synchronous generators be required
Commission’s regulations, which provides: ‘‘Every to design the generating facility to
apparent given the current generation public utility that is required to have on file a non-
mix could result if a region were to lose discriminatory open access transmission tariff
maintain the required power factor
synchronous resources that supply under this section must amend such tariff by adding range only when the generator’s real
reactive power and the resulting the standard interconnection procedures and power output exceeds 10 percent of its
generation mix consisted of a significant agreement and the standard small generator nameplate capacity.40 In requiring a
interconnection procedures and agreement required generator to provide reactive power, the
by Commission rulemaking proceedings
28 As discussed above, in exempting wind
promulgating and amending such interconnection interconnection agreements would state:
generators from the reactive power requirement, the procedures and agreements, or such other ‘‘Non-synchronous generators shall only
Commission sought to avoid creating an obstacle to interconnection procedures and agreements as may be required to maintain the above power
the development of wind generation. For example, be required by Commission rulemaking proceedings
in Order No. 661, the Commission was concerned
factor when their output is above 10
promulgating and amending the standard
with ‘‘remov[ing] unnecessary obstacles to the interconnection procedures and agreement and the
36 Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,036 at
increased growth of wind generation.’’ Id. P 50. standard small generator interconnection
29 A Type III wind turbine is a non-synchronous procedures and agreement.’’ 18 CFR 35.28(f)(1) 31,760–63.
37 The pro forma LGIA defines ‘‘Point of
wound-rotor generator that has a three phase AC (2015). See Integration of Variable Energy
field applied to the rotor from a partially-rated Resources, Order No. 764, FERC Stats. & Regs. Interconnection’’ as ‘‘the point, as set forth in
power-electronics converter. A Type IV wind ¶ 31,331, at PP 343–345 (adopting this regulatory Appendix A to the Standard Large Generator
turbine is an AC generator in which the stator text effective September 11, 2012), order on reh’g Interconnection Agreement, where the
windings are connected to the power system and clarification, Order No. 764–A, 141 FERC Interconnection Facilities connect to the
through a fully-rated power-electronics converter. ¶ 61,232 (2012), order on clarification and reh’g, Transmission Provider’s Transmission System.’’
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Both Type III and Type IV wind turbines have Order No. 764–B, 144 FERC ¶ 61,222 (2013). While Similarly, the pro forma SGIA defines ‘‘Point of
inherent reactive power capabilities. not revising regulatory text, the Commission is Interconnection’’ as ‘‘[t]he point where the
30 Id. PP 50–51. using the process provided for rulemaking Interconnection Facilities connect with the
31 See, e.g., Sw. Power Pool, Inc., 119 FERC proceedings, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(4)–(5) Transmission Provider’s Transmission System.’’
(2012). 38 See Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs.
¶ 61,199, at P 29 (‘‘Providing reactive power within
the [standard power factor range] is an obligation 34 Order No. 2003–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,186 at P 66.
of a generator, and is as much an obligation of a ¶ 31,160 at P 416. 39 Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Staff
generator as, for example, operating in accordance 35 See Payment for Reactive Power, Commission Report, Docket No. AD14–7, at 7 (Apr. 22, 2014).
with Good Utility Practice.’’), order on reh’g, 121 Staff Report, Docket No. AD14–7, app. 2 (Apr. 22, 40 See Order No. 661, FERC Stats. & Regs.
FERC ¶ 61,196 (2007). 2014). ¶ 31,186 at P 46.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_73910/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules 73687
percent of the Generating Facility limitations due to voltage level, real power of nameplate capacity. And finally, we
Capacity.’’ The Commission’s output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors note that a non-synchronous generator
understanding is that the inverters used if agreed to by the Transmission Provider, or will be eligible for compensation for
a combination of the two. The
by non-synchronous generators are not Interconnection Customer shall not disable
reactive power, consistent with the
capable of producing reactive power power factor equipment while the wind plant compensation provisions of the pro
when operating below 10 percent of is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA.47 The
nameplate capacity.41 to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support Commission seeks comment on whether
16. Specifically, with deleted text in in lieu of the power system stabilizer and the existing methods used to determine
brackets and added text in italics, the automatic voltage regulation at the generator reactive power compensation are
Commission proposes to revise section excitation system if the System Impact Study appropriate for wind generators and, if
9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA to read: shows this to be required for system safety not, what alternatives would be
or reliability.45
Interconnection Customer shall design the appropriate.48
Large Generating Facility to maintain a 17. The Commission proposes to
apply the reactive power requirement to Proposed Compliance Procedures
composite power delivery at continuous
rated power output at the Point of all newly interconnecting non- 19. To comply with the requirements
Interconnection at a power factor within the synchronous generators, as well as all of this Proposal, the Commission
range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless existing non-synchronous generators proposes to require each public utility 49
Transmission Provider has established making upgrades to their generation transmission provider to submit a
different requirements that apply to all facilities that require new compliance filing within 90 days of the
generators in the Control Area on a interconnection requests, as of the effective date of the final revision in this
comparable basis. [The requirements of this
effective date of the final revision. The proceeding revising its pro forma LGIA
paragraph shall not apply to wind
generators.] Non-synchronous generators Commission also proposes to apply the and pro forma SGIA subject to the
shall only be required to maintain the above reactive power requirement to all newly Commission’s jurisdiction as necessary
power factor when their output is above 10 interconnecting non-synchronous to demonstrate that it meets the
percent of the Generating Facility Capacity.42 generators that have requested that an requirements set forth in this Proposal.
LGIA or SGIA be filed unexecuted with 20. In some cases, public utility
The Commission similarly proposes
the Commission that is still pending transmission providers may have
to revise section 1.8.1 of the pro forma
before the Commission as of the provisions in their currently effective
SGIA to read:
effective date of the final revision. Thus, pro forma LGIAs and pro forma SGIAs
The Interconnection Customer shall design the requirement would not apply to related to the provision of reactive
its Small Generating Facility to maintain a non-synchronous generators that have power by non-synchronous generators
composite power delivery at continuous that the Commission has deemed to be
executed an LGIA or SGIA, as relevant,
rated power output at the Point of
Interconnection at a power factor within the prior to the effective date of the final consistent with or superior to the pro
range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, unless revision, unless they propose upgrades forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA. Where
the Transmission Provider has established to their generation facilities that require these pro forma LGIA and pro forma
different requirements that apply to all new interconnection requests. Given SGIA provisions will be modified by the
similarly situated generators in the control that not all existing wind generators are final revision, public utility
area on a comparable basis. [The capable of providing reactive power transmission providers must either
requirements of this paragraph shall not without incurring substantial costs to comply with the final revision or
apply to wind generators.] Non-synchronous install new equipment, we do not demonstrate that these previously-
generators shall only be required to maintain approved pro forma LGIA and pro
believe it is reasonable or necessary to
the above power factor when their output is
above 10 percent of the generator nameplate require those generators to provide forma SGIA variations continue to be
capacity.43 reactive power. However, existing wind consistent with or superior to the pro
generators that make upgrades to their forma LGIA and pro forma SGIA as
In addition, the Commission would generation facility that require a new modified by the final revision.
strike paragraph A.ii of Appendix G to interconnection request will be required 21. The Commission will assess
the pro forma LGIA, ‘‘Technical to conform to this new requirement. whether each compliance filing satisfies
Standards Applicable to a Wind 18. The Commission seeks comments the proposed requirements and
Generation Plant.’’ 44 on the Proposal to remove the principles stated above and issue
A wind generating plant shall maintain a exemptions for wind generators from additional orders as necessary to ensure
power factor within the range of 0.95 leading the reactive power requirement. Further, that each public utility transmission
to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of the Commission seeks comments on provider meets the requirements of this
Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if whether the current power factor range Proposal and the subsequent final
the Transmission Provider’s System Impact of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, as set revision.
Study shows that such a requirement is 22. The Commission proposes that
forth in the existing pro forma
necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The
interconnection agreements,46 is transmission providers that are not
power factor range standard can be met by
using, for example, power electronics reasonable given the technology used by
47 Section 9.6.3 of the pro forma LGIA and section
designed to supply this level of reactive non-synchronous generators. The
1.8.2 of the pro forma SGIA.
capability 606 (taking into account any Commission also seeks comments on 48 See Payment for Reactive Power, Commission
the proposed requirement that newly Staff Report, Docket No. AD14–7, app. 1 (Apr. 22,
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41 Id.
interconnecting non-synchronous 2014).
42 Section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA. generators only be required to produce 49 For purposes of this Proposal, a public utility
43 Section 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA. reactive power when the generator’s real is a utility that owns, controls, or operates facilities
44 The full text of the pro forma LGIA will be used for transmitting electric energy in interstate
posted on the Commission’s internet page at:
power output is greater than 10 percent commerce, as defined by the FPA. See 16 U.S.C.
http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/ 824(e) (2012). A non-public utility that seeks
45 Section A.ii of Appendix G to the pro forma
gi/stnd-gen.asp. The full text of the pro forma SGIA voluntary compliance with the reciprocity
will be posted on the Commission’s internet page LGIA. condition of an OATT may satisfy that condition by
at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus- 46 Section 9.6.1 of the pro forma LGIA and section filing an OATT, which includes the pro forma LGIA
act/gi/small-gen.asp. 1.8.1 of the pro forma SGIA. and SGIA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Nov 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_73910/page/5.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Proposed Rules 73689
following: Federal Energy Regulatory Environmental Assessment nor an Document Availability
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Environmental Impact Statement is 34. In addition to publishing the full
Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen required for this Proposal under section text of this document in the Federal
Brown, Office of the Executive Director], 380.4(a)(15) of the Commission’s Register, the Commission provides all
email: DataClearance@ferc.gov, phone: regulations, which provides a interested persons an opportunity to
(202) 502–8663, fax: (202) 273–0873. categorical exemption for approval of view and/or print the contents of this
Comments concerning the collection of actions under sections 205 and 206 of document via the Internet through the
information and the associated burden the FPA relating to the filing of Commission’s Home Page (http://
estimate(s), may also be sent to the schedules containing all rates and www.ferc.gov) and in the Commission’s
Office of Information and Regulatory charges for the transmission or sale of Public Reference Room during normal
Affairs, Office of Management and electric energy subject to the business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Commission’s jurisdiction, plus the Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk classification, practices, contracts and Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
Officer for the Federal Energy regulations that affect rates, charges, 35. From the Commission’s Home
Regulatory Commission, phone: (202) classifications, and services.60 The Page on the Internet, this information is
395–0710, fax: (202) 395–7285]. Due to revisions proposed in this Proposal
security concerns, comments should be available on eLibrary. The full text of
would update and clarify the this document is available on eLibrary
sent electronically to the following application of the Commission’s
email address: oira_submission@ in PDF and Microsoft Word format for
standard interconnection requirements viewing, printing, and/or downloading.
omb.eop.gov. Comments submitted to to wind generators. Therefore, this
OMB should include FERC–516 and To access this document in eLibrary,
Proposal falls within the categorical type the docket number of this
OMB Control No. 1902–0096. exemptions provided in the document, excluding the last three
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification Commission’s regulations, and as a digits, in the docket number field.
result neither an environmental impact 36. User assistance is available for
27. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of statement nor an environmental
1980 (RFA) 58 generally requires a eLibrary and the Commission’s Web site
assessment is required. during normal business hours from the
description and analysis of rules that
will have significant economic impact Comment Procedures Commission’s Online Support at (202)
on a substantial number of small 502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676)
30. The Commission invites interested or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov,
entities. The RFA does not mandate any persons to submit comments on the
particular outcome in a rulemaking. It or the Public Reference Room at (202)
matters and issues proposed in this 502–8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email
only requires consideration of Proposal to be adopted, including any
alternatives that are less burdensome to the Public Reference Room at
related matters or alternative proposals public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
small entities and an agency that commenters may wish to discuss.
explanation of why alternatives were List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 35
Comments are due January 25, 2016.
rejected.
Comments must refer to Docket No. Electric power rates, Electric utilities,
28. To the extent the RFA applies to
this proceeding, the Commission RM16–1–000, and must include the Non-discriminatory open access
estimates that the total number of public commenter’s name, the organization transmission tariffs.
utility transmission providers that they represent, if applicable, and their
address. By direction of the Commission.
would have to modify their currently Issued: November 19, 2015
effective pro forma LGIA and pro forma 31. The Commission encourages
comments to be filed electronically via Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
SGIA is 132. Of these, the Commission
the eFiling link on the Commission’s Deputy Secretary.
estimates the total number that are small
entities is 11. The Commission Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. The [FR Doc. 2015–29972 Filed 11–24–15; 8:45 am]
estimates the average total cost of these Commission accepts most standard BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
entities will be minimal, requiring on word processing formats. Documents
average 15 hours, or $1,080 in expenses. created electronically using word
The Commission does not consider this processing software should be filed in DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
to be a significant economic impact. As native applications or print-to-PDF SECURITY
a result, the Commission certifies that format and not in a scanned format.
the reforms proposed in this Proposal Commenters filing electronically do not Coast Guard
would not have a significant economic need to make a paper filing.
impact on a substantial number of small 32. Commenters that are not able to 33 CFR Part 110
entities. file comments electronically must send [Docket Number USCG–2012–0806]
an original of their comments to:
Environmental Analysis Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, RIN 1625–AA01
29. The Commission is required to Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
prepare an Environmental Assessment Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. Anchorage Regulations; Connecticut
or an Environmental Impact Statement 33. All comments will be placed in River, Old Saybrook, CT
for any action that may have a the Commission’s public files and may AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
significant adverse effect on the human be viewed, printed, or downloaded ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
environment.59 The Commission remotely as described in the Document
concludes that neither an Availability section below. Commenters SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
on this Proposal are not required to establish three special anchorage areas
58 5U.S.C. 601–12 (2012). serve copies of their comments on other in the Connecticut River in the vicinity
59 RegulationsImplementing the National commenters. Old Saybrook, CT. This proposed action
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Order No. 486,
52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), FERC Stats. & Regs., is necessary to facilitate safe navigation
Regulations Preambles 1986–1990 ¶ 30,783 (1987). 60 18 CFR 380.4(a)(15) (2015). in that area and provide safe and secure
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 24, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_73910/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-01 11:15:38
Document Modified: 2018-03-01 11:15:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments are due January 25, 2016. | |
| Contact | Brian Bak (Technical Information), Office of Energy Policy and Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6574, [email protected] Gretchen Kershaw (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8213, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 73683 | |
| CFR Associated | Electric Power Rates; Electric Utilities and Non-Discriminatory Open Access Transmission Tariffs |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR