80 FR 75657 - Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 232 (December 3, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 232 (December 3, 2015)
| Page Range | 75657-75660 | |
| FR Document | 2015-30604 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 232 (Thursday, December 3, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 75657-75660] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-30604] ======================================================================== Notices Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Notices [[Page 75657]] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with October anniversary dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. DATES: Effective Date: December 3, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with October anniversary dates. All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, or comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time. Notice of No Sales If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (``POR''), it must notify the Department within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically at http://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.\1\ Such submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served on every party on the Department's service list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to place the CBP data on the record within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 30 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection should be submitted seven days after the placement of the CBP data on the record of this review. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments should submit those comments five days after the deadline for the initial comments. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value (``Q&V'') Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete Q&V data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. Separate Rates In proceedings involving non-market economy (``NME'') countries, the [[Page 75658]] Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is the Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be entitled to a separate rate. To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from government control of its export activities to be entitled to a separate rate, the Department analyzes each entity exporting the subject merchandise under a test arising from the Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the People's Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 (May 2, 1994). In accordance with the separate rates criteria, the Department assigns separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can demonstrate the absence of both de jure and de facto government control over export activities. All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below. For these administrative reviews, in order to demonstrate separate rate eligibility, the Department requires entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the ``Instructions for Filing the Certification'' in the Separate Rate Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to the Department no later than 30 calendar days after publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a completed segment of the proceeding \2\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or changes to their official company name,\3\ should timely file a Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Status Application will be available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Status Application, refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate Status Applications are due to the Department no later than 30 calendar days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Status Application applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United States. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Such entities include entities that have not participated in the proceeding, entities that were preliminarily granted a separate rate in any currently incomplete segment of the proceeding (e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their separate rate in the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which they participated. \3\ Only changes to the official company name, rather than trade names, need to be addressed via a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate Rate Certification. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents. Initiation of Reviews In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than October 31, 2016. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period to be reviewed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mexico: Carbon and Certain Alloy Wire Rod, A- 10/1/14-9/30/15 201-830....................................... Deacero S.A.P. I. de C.V. (AKA Deacero S.A. de C.V.).................................. ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (``AMLT'')................................ The People's Republic of China: Steel Wire 10/1/14-9/30/15 Garment Hangers, A-570-918.................... Da Sheng Hanger Ind. Co., Ltd.............. Feirongda Weaving Material Co. Ltd......... Hangzhou Qingqing Mechanical Co. Ltd....... Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co. Ltd......... Hangzhou Yinte............................. Hong Kong Wells Ltd........................ Hongye (HK) Group Development Co. Ltd...... Liaoning Metals & Mineral Imp/Exp Corp..... Nantong Eason Foreign Trade Co., Ltd....... Ningbo Bingcheng Import & Export Co. Ltd... Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd..... Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Ind. Co. Ltd......... Ningbo Peacebird Import & Export Co. Ltd... Shang Zhou Leather Shoes Plant............. Shanghai Bao Heng Relay Making Co., Ltd.... [[Page 75659]] Shanghai Ding Ying Printing & Dyeing Co. Ltd....................................... Shanghai Ganghun Beddiry Clothing Factory.. Shanghai Guangwei Shoes Co., Ltd........... Shanghai Guoxing Metal Products Co. Ltd.... Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co. Ltd....................................... Shanghai Lian Development Co. Ltd.......... Shanghai Shuang Qiang Embroidery Factory Co. Ltd................................... Shanghai Tonghui........................... Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd............. Shangyu Baoli Electro Chemical Aluminum Products Co., Ltd......................... Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd Shangyu Tongfang Labour Protective Articles Co., Ltd.................................. Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd. Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co. Ltd. Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd....................................... Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co., Ltd Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd....................................... Shaoxing Meideli Hanger Co. Ltd............ Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd Shaoxing Shuren Tie Co. Ltd................ Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd....................................... Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd....................................... Shaoxing Zhongdi Foreign Trade Co. Ltd..... Tianjin Innovation International........... Tianjin Tailai Import and Export Co. Ltd... Wahfay Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd......... Wesken International (Kunshan) Co. Ltd..... Xia Fang Hanger (Cambodia) Co., Ltd........ Zhejiang Hongfei Plastic Industry Co. Ltd.. Zhejiang Jaguar Import & Export Co. Ltd.... Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co. Ltd........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Countervailing Duty Proceedings None. Suspension Agreements None. Duty Absorption Reviews During any administrative review covering all or part of a period falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested. Gap Period Liquidation For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Revised Factual Information Requirements On April 10, 2013, the Department published Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013), which modified two regulations related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). The final rule identifies five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). The final rule requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the [[Page 75660]] record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 so that, rather than providing general time limits, there are specific time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after May 10, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\4\ Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials as well as their representatives. All segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.\5\ The Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See section 782(b) of the Act. \5\ See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (``Final Rule''); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised Extension of Time Limits Regulation On September 20, 2013, the Department modified its regulation concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The modification clarifies that parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, the Department may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: November 25, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-30604 Filed 12-2-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![75660 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Notices
record, to provide an explanation the adequacy of remuneration under 19 through April 30, 2014.1 This review
identifying the information already on CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 covers one producer/exporter of subject
the record that the factual information CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, merchandise, Nava Bharat Ventures
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The clarification and correction filed Limited (Nava). For the final results, we
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) continue to determine that Nava did not
so that, rather than providing general comments concerning the selection of a sell subject merchandise to the United
time limits, there are specific time limits surrogate country and surrogate values States at below normal value (NV)
based on the type of factual information and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning during the POR. The final results are
being submitted. These modifications U.S. Customs and Border Protection listed in the section entitled ‘‘Final
are effective for all segments initiated on data; and (5) quantity and value Results of Review’’ below.
or after May 10, 2013. Please review the questionnaires. Under certain DATES: Effective date: December 3, 2015.
final rule, available at http:// circumstances, the Department may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ elect to specify a different time limit by David Lindgren at (202) 482–3870; AD/
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to which extension requests will be CVD Operations, Office VII,
submitting factual information in this considered untimely for submissions Enforcement and Compliance,
segment. which are due from multiple parties International Trade Administration,
Any party submitting factual simultaneously. In such a case, the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
information in an antidumping duty or Department will inform parties in the Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
countervailing duty proceeding must letter or memorandum setting forth the Washington, DC 20230.
certify to the accuracy and completeness deadline (including a specified time) by
of that information.4 Parties are hereby SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
which extension requests must be filed
reminded that revised certification to be considered timely. This Background
requirements are in effect for company/ modification also requires that an
government officials as well as their On June 4, 2015, the Department
extension request must be made in a published the Preliminary Results of
representatives. All segments of any separate, stand-alone submission, and
antidumping duty or countervailing this administrative review and, on
clarifies the circumstances under which August 24, 2015, we invited parties to
duty proceedings initiated on or after the Department will grant untimely-
August 16, 2013, should use the formats comment on the Preliminary Results.
filed requests for the extension of time The administrative review covers one
for the revised certifications provided at limits. These modifications are effective
the end of the Final Rule.5 The producer and exporter of the subject
for all segments initiated on or after merchandise to the United States, Nava.
Department intends to reject factual October 21, 2013. Please review the Petitioners timely filed their case brief
submissions in any proceeding final rule, available at http:// on September 4, 2015, and Nava timely
segments if the submitting party does www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ filed its rebuttal brief on September 8,
not comply with applicable revised html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 2015. The Department conducted this
certification requirements. submitting factual information in these administrative review in accordance
Revised Extension of Time Limits segments. with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
Regulation These initiations and this notice are 1930, as amended (the Act).
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
On September 20, 2013, the Scope of the Order
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
Department modified its regulation
351.221(c)(1)(i). The products subject to the order are
concerning the extension of time limits
for submissions in antidumping and Dated: November 25, 2015. all forms, sizes and compositions of
countervailing duty proceedings: Final Christian Marsh, silicomanganese, except low-carbon
Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
silicomanganese, including
The modification clarifies that parties and Countervailing Duty Operations. silicomanganese briquettes, fines and
may request an extension of time limits [FR Doc. 2015–30604 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am]
slag. The silicomanganese subject to the
before a time limit established under order is currently classifiable under
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Part 351 expires, or as otherwise subheading 7202.30.0000 of the
specified by the Secretary. In general, an Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
extension request will be considered DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
untimely if it is filed after the time limit subheading is provided for convenience
established under Part 351 expires. For International Trade Administration and customs purposes. The written
submissions which are due from description is dispositive. A full
multiple parties simultaneously, an [A–533–823] description of the scope of the order is
extension request will be considered contained in the Issues and Decision
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on Silicomanganese From India: Final Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
the due date. Examples include, but are Results of Antidumping Duty by this notice.2 The Issues and Decision
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal Administrative Review; 2013–2014 Memorandum is a public document and
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; is on file electronically via Enforcement
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
(2) factual information to value factors International Trade Administration, 1 See Silicomanganese From India: Preliminary
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure U.S. Department of Commerce. Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 31891 (June 4, 2015)
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 See
SUMMARY: On June 4, 2015, the
section 782(b) of the Act. (Preliminary Results).
5 See Certification of Factual Information To
Department of Commerce (Department) 2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Import Administration During Antidumping and published its preliminary results of the Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July administrative review of the and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of the
17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently antidumping duty order on 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative
asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available Review of Silicomanganese from India,’’ dated
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
silicomanganese from India covering the concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. period of review (POR) May 1, 2013, Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:11 Dec 02, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_75889/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:51:29
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:51:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 75657 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR