80_FR_76493 80 FR 76258 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution Control District

80 FR 76258 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution Control District

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 235 (December 8, 2015)

Page Range76258-76258
FR Document2015-30829

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). This revision describes actions that PCAPCD will take to prevent air pollution concentrations from reaching dangerously high levels.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 76258]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0689; FRL-9936-81-Region 9]


Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Placer County Air 
Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District 
(PCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). This revision describes 
actions that PCAPCD will take to prevent air pollution concentrations 
from reaching dangerously high levels.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by January 7, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2015-0689, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email: [email protected].
    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 
94105-3901.
    Instructions: Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or 
withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part 
of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html 
for instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the 
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish 
to make. For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit 
http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are 
available electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA 
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. 
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, 
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy 
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be 
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard 
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business 
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415) 
947-4120 [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA. In the Rules and Regulations section of this 
Federal Register, we are approving the Placer County Ozone Emergency 
Episode Plan in a direct final action without prior proposal because we 
believe this SIP revision is not controversial. If we receive adverse 
comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct 
final rule and address the comments in a subsequent action based on 
this proposed rule.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone 
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not 
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further 
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: October 26, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015-30829 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                               76258                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules

                                               instructions for submitting comments.                   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                              documents in the docket are listed at
                                               Once submitted, comments cannot be                      AGENCY                                                www.regulations.gov, some information
                                               edited or removed from Regulations.gov.                                                                       may be publicly available only at the
                                               The EPA may publish any comment                         40 CFR Part 52                                        hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
                                               received to its public docket. Do not                   [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0689; FRL–9936–81–                  material, large maps), and some may not
                                               submit electronically any information                   Region 9]                                             be publicly available in either location
                                               you consider to be Confidential                                                                               (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
                                               Business Information (CBI) or other                     Approval of California Air Plan                       materials, please schedule an
                                               information whose disclosure is                         Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution                appointment during normal business
                                               restricted by statute. Multimedia                       Control District                                      hours with the contact listed in the FOR
                                               submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be                                                                      FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
                                               accompanied by a written comment.                       AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                                                                                                                                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               The written comment is considered the                   Agency (EPA).
                                                                                                                                                             Vanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415)
                                               official comment and should include                     ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                                                                                                                                             947–4120 graham.vanessa@epa.gov.
                                               discussion of all points you wish to                    SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                               make. The EPA will generally not                        Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a                Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
                                               consider comments or comment                            revision to the Placer County Air                     and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. In the Rules
                                               contents located outside of the primary                 Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)                   and Regulations section of this Federal
                                               submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or                  portion of the California State                       Register, we are approving the Placer
                                               other file sharing system). For                         Implementation Plan (SIP) under the                   County Ozone Emergency Episode Plan
                                               additional submission methods, the full                 Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). This                  in a direct final action without prior
                                               EPA public comment policy,                              revision describes actions that PCAPCD                proposal because we believe this SIP
                                               information about CBI or multimedia                     will take to prevent air pollution                    revision is not controversial. If we
                                               submissions, and general guidance on                    concentrations from reaching                          receive adverse comments, however, we
                                               making effective comments, please visit                 dangerously high levels.                              will publish a timely withdrawal of the
                                               http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/                                                                                  direct final rule and address the
                                                                                                       DATES: Any comments on this proposal
                                               commenting-epa-dockets.                                                                                       comments in a subsequent action based
                                                                                                       must arrive by January 7, 2016.
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        ADDRESSES: Submit comments,                           on this proposed rule.
                                               Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)                    identified by docket number EPA–R09–                     We do not plan to open a second
                                               972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.                       OAR–2015–0689, by one of the                          comment period, so anyone interested
                                                                                                       following methods:                                    in commenting should do so at this
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                                                                    time. If we do not receive adverse
                                                                                                         1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
                                               Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’                www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line               comments, no further activity is
                                               and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This                      instructions.                                         planned. For further information, please
                                               proposal addresses the following local                    2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.                   see the direct final action.
                                               rules: SCAQMD Rule 1151,‘‘Motor                           3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel                    Dated: October 26, 2015.
                                               Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-                       (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
                                               Assembly Line Coating Operations,’’                                                                           Jared Blumenfeld,
                                                                                                       Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
                                               and YSAQMD Rule 2.26, ‘‘Motor                                                                                 Regional Administrator, Region IX.
                                                                                                       San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
                                               Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating                      Instructions: Once submitted,                       [FR Doc. 2015–30829 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
                                               Operations’’. In the Rules and                          comments cannot be edited or                          BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                               Regulations section of this Federal                     withdrawn. The EPA may publish any
                                               Register, we are approving these local                  comment received to its public docket.
                                               rules in a direct final action without                  Do not submit electronically any                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                               prior proposal because we believe these                 information you consider to be                        AGENCY
                                               SIP revisions are not controversial. If we              Confidential Business Information (CBI)
                                               receive adverse comments, however, we                                                                         40 CFR Part 52
                                                                                                       or other information whose disclosure is
                                               will publish a timely withdrawal of the                 restricted by statute. If you need to                 [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0619; FRL–9936–66–
                                               direct final rule and address the                       include CBI as part of your comment,                  Region 9]
                                               comments in subsequent action based                     please visit http://www.epa.gov/
                                               on this proposed rule. Please note that                                                                       Revisions to the California State
                                                                                                       dockets/comments.html for instructions.
                                               if we receive adverse comment on a                                                                            Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley
                                                                                                       Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
                                               particular rule, we may adopt as final                                                                        Air Quality Management District,
                                                                                                       etc.) must be accompanied by a written
                                               the rule that is not the subject of an                                                                        Feather River Air Quality Management
                                                                                                       comment. The written comment is
                                               adverse comment.                                                                                              District and Santa Barbara County Air
                                                                                                       considered the official comment and
                                                                                                                                                             Pollution Control District
                                                  We do not plan to open a second                      should include discussion of all points
                                               comment period, so anyone interested                    you wish to make. For additional                      AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                               in commenting should do so at this                      submission methods, the full EPA                      Agency (EPA).
                                               time. If we do not receive adverse                      public comment policy, and general                    ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                               comments, no further activity is                        guidance on making effective
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               planned. For further information, please                comments, please visit http://                        SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection
                                               see the direct final action.                            www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.                    Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
                                                                                                         Docket: Generally, documents in the                 revisions to the Antelope Valley Air
                                                 Dated: November 5, 2015.
                                                                                                       docket for this action are available                  Quality Management District
                                               Jared Blumenfeld,                                       electronically at www.regulations.gov or              (AVAQMD), Feather River Air Quality
                                               Regional Administrator, Region IX.                      in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75                     Management District (FRAQMD), and
                                               [FR Doc. 2015–30825 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]             Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,                      Santa Barbara County Air Pollution
                                               BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  California 94105–3901. While all                      Control District (SBCAPCD) portions of


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:16 Dec 07, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00008   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM   08DEP1



Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:27:49
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:27:49
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesAny comments on this proposal must arrive by January 7, 2016.
ContactVanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4120 [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 76258 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR