80 FR 76674 - Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 237 (December 10, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 237 (December 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 76674-76676 | |
| FR Document | 2015-31188 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 76674-76676] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-31188] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-501] Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 5, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey.\1\ The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014. The review covers the following producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Borusan); \2\ Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Toscelik); \3\ and ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ``Final Results of the Review.'' Further, we find that one of the companies covered by this review had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 32090 (June 5, 2015) (Preliminary Results). \2\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department treats Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32090 and n. 3. \3\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department treats Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. as the same legal entity. Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective date: December 10, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924, (202) 482-2657, and (202) 482-0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 5, 2015, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On July 26, 2015, we received a case brief from Toscelik. On July 27, 2015, we received case briefs from Allied Tube & Conduit and TMK IPSCO (petitioner) and from Borusan. On August 10, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from petitioner, Borusan, and Toscelik. The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description is dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ A full written description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 2013-2014,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice and which is incorporated herein by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined that Erbosan had no shipments during the POR.\5\ Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding this company. As a consequence, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that Erbosan made no [[Page 76675]] shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32091 and the accompanying preliminary decision memorandum at 3-4. \6\ See, e.g. Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to the Preliminary Results. For a discussion of these changes, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.\7\........... 3.16 Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.\8\................... 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Also includes Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. See footnote 3. \8\ Also includes Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. See footnote 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For Borusan, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department has calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates. We calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to liquidate its entries during the POR imported by the importers identified in its questionnaire responses without regard to antidumping duties because its weighted- average dumping margin in these final results is zero.\9\ Consistent with the Department's assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Borusan, Erbosan, or Toscelik for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103, 8103 (February 14, 2012). \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for Borusan and Toscelik will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\11\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply [[Page 76676]] with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 2, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues General Comments 1. Duty Drawback 2. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Resource Utilization Support Fund 3. Deducting Certain Expenses from the Duty Drawback Calculation 4. Making a Duty Drawback Adjustment to Normal Value and/or Capping the U.S. Duty Drawback Adjustment 5. Treatment of Duty Drawback in the Cash Deposit Rate and Assessment Rate 6. Other Arguments Related to Duty Drawback 7. Differential Pricing Analysis Should Not Be Used Because the Cohen's d Test Does Not Measure Targeted or Masked Dumping 8. Differential Pricing Analysis Reasoning for Use of Average-to- Transaction Comparison Methodology is Arbitrary and Unlawful Company-Specific Comments Borusan 9. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Yield Loss Factor 10. Home Market Sales of Overruns and the Ordinary Course of Trade 11. Domestic Inland Freight Expenses 12. International Freight Expenses Toscelik 13. Billing Adjustments 14. Duty Drawback 15. Duty Drawback Adjustment to Cost 16. Toscelik's Net Financial Expense Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-31188 Filed 12-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![76674 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices
lodging, most meals, local ground Washington, DC, Tel: (202) 482–1706, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
transportation, except as stated in the Email: jeffrey.goldberg@trade.gov. Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James
proposed agenda, and air transportation AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
Frank Spector,
from the United States to the mission Enforcement and Compliance,
Acting Director, Trade Missions Program.
site and return to the United States. International Trade Administration,
[FR Doc. 2015–31144 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am] U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Timeline for Recruitment and BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Applications Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
Mission recruitment will be 482–2924, (202) 482–2657, and (202)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 482–0649, respectively.
conducted in an open and public
manner, including publication in the International Trade Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Register, posting on the [A–489–501] Background
Commerce Department trade mission On June 5, 2015, the Department
calendar (http://export.gov/industry/ Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe published the Preliminary Results of
education/) and other Internet Web and Tube Products From Turkey: Final this review in the Federal Register. We
sites, press releases to general and trade Results of Antidumping Duty invited parties to comment on the
media, direct mail, notices by industry Administrative Review and Final Preliminary Results. On July 26, 2015,
trade associations and other multiplier Determination of No Shipments; 2013– we received a case brief from Toscelik.
groups, and publicity at industry 2014 On July 27, 2015, we received case
meetings, symposia, conferences, and briefs from Allied Tube & Conduit and
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
trade shows. Recruitment for the TMK IPSCO (petitioner) and from
International Trade Administration,
mission will begin immediately and Borusan. On August 10, 2015, we
Department of Commerce.
conclude no later than March 1, 2016. received rebuttal briefs from petitioner,
SUMMARY: On June 5, 2015, the
Applications for the mission will be Borusan, and Toscelik. The Department
accepted on a rolling basis. Applications Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary conducted this review in accordance
received after March 1, 2016, will be with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act
considered only if space and scheduling results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on welded of 1930, as amended (the Act).
constraints permit.
carbon steel standard pipe and tube Scope of the Order
Conditions for Participation products (welded pipe and tube) from The merchandise subject to the order
Turkey.1 The period of review (POR) is is welded pipe and tube. The welded
An applicant must submit a timely, May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014.
completed and signed mission pipe and tube subject to the order is
The review covers the following currently classifiable under subheading
application and supplemental producers/exporters of the subject
application materials, including 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
merchandise: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
adequate information on course T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
offerings, primary market objectives, Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, 7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff
and goals for participation. The Borusan); 2 Toscelik Profil ve Sac Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
institution must have appropriate Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret The HTSUS subheadings are provided
accreditation as specified per paragraph A.S. (collectively, Toscelik); 3 and for convenience and customs purposes
one above. The institution must be ERBOSAN Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve only. The written description is
represented at the student fair by an Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan). Based on our dispositive.4
employee. No agents will be allowed to analysis of the comments received, we
represent a school on the mission or have made certain changes in the Final Determination of No Shipments
participate at the student fair. Agents margin calculations. Therefore, the final In the Preliminary Results, the
will also not be allowed into the fairs to results differ from the preliminary Department preliminarily determined
solicit new partnerships. If the results. The final weighted-average that Erbosan had no shipments during
Department of Commerce receives an dumping margins for the reviewed firms the POR.5 Following publication of the
incomplete application, the Department are listed below in the section entitled, Preliminary Results, we received no
may reject the application, request ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ Further, comments from interested parties
additional information, or take the lack we find that one of the companies regarding this company. As a
of information into account when covered by this review had no consequence, and because the record
evaluating the applications. shipments of subject merchandise contains no evidence to the contrary, we
during the POR. continue to find that Erbosan made no
Participants must travel to both stops
DATES: Effective date: December 10,
in Panama and Honduras on the
mission. Guatemala is the only optional 2015. 4 A full written description of the scope of the
order is contained in the memorandum from Gary
stop. 1 See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Each applicant must certify that the Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
services it seeks to export through the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
2014, 80 FR 32090 (June 5, 2015) (Preliminary
mission are either produced in the Results). ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
United States, or, if not, marketed under 2 As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
the name of a U.S. firm and have at least Department treats Borusan Mannesmann Boru Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and
Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret Tube Products from Turkey; 2013–2014,’’ (Issues
51 percent U.S. content of the value of and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently
T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See Preliminary
the service. Results, 80 FR at 32090 and n. 3. with this notice and which is incorporated herein
3 As explained in the Preliminary Results, the by reference.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 5 See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 32091 and the
Department treats Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi
Jeffrey Goldberg, Industry & Analysis, A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. as the same legal accompanying preliminary decision memorandum
Office of Trade Promotion Programs, entity. Id. at 3–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:33 Dec 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_76911/page/1.svg)
![76676 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices
with the regulations and terms of an ACTION: Notice, recommendation; workers and the public.’’ As a point of
APO is a sanctionable violation. correction. clarification, the Department of Energy
We are issuing and publishing these (DOE) demonstrates adequate protection
results in accordance with sections SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear of workers, the public and the
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Facilities Safety Board (Board) environment as an integral part of
published a notice of a recommendation
Dated: December 2, 2015. operating a nuclear facility like that
to the Secretary of Energy in the Federal
Christian Marsh, situated at the Pantex Plant. To this end,
Register of December 3, 2015, (80 FR
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 75665), concerning emergency the Department has put in place a
and Countervailing Duty Operations. system of requirements, standards,
preparedness at the Pantex Plant. The
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Board corrects that notice by providing policies and guidance that, when
the Issues and Decision Memorandum the additional information as set forth effectively implemented, not only
below. provide reasonable assurance of
Summary
adequate protection, but takes a very
Background FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scope of the Order conservative approach to ensure such
Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense
Discussion of the Issues protection. Functions such as
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625
emergency management provide that
General Comments Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700,
Washington, DC 20004–2901, or additional conservatism and margin of
1. Duty Drawback
telephone number (202) 694–7000. protection. We are confident that, even
2. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the
Resource Utilization Support Fund with deficiencies identified by the
3. Deducting Certain Expenses from the Duty Correction DNFSB, the Pantex Emergency
Drawback Calculation In the Federal Register of December 3, Management Program can perform its
4. Making a Duty Drawback Adjustment to 2015, in FR Doc. 2015–30562, on page role to ensure this protection.
Normal Value and/or Capping the U.S. Accordingly, DOE recommends
75673, in the first column, after line 37,
Duty Drawback Adjustment
5. Treatment of Duty Drawback in the Cash add the following information: removing the phrase: ‘‘in order to
Deposit Rate and Assessment Rate provide an adequate protection to the
CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE
6. Other Arguments Related to Duty public and the workers’’ in justifying
SECRETARY
Drawback the need for the draft recommendation.
7. Differential Pricing Analysis Should Not Department of Energy
Be Used Because the Cohen’s d Test To increase protection assurances and
Under Secretary for Nuclear Security
Does Not Measure Targeted or Masked Administrator, National Nuclear drive improvement in an effective and
Dumping Security Administration efficient manner, I suggest that the best
8. Differential Pricing Analysis Reasoning for approach to address the concerns
Use of Average-to-Transaction
Washington, DC 20585
November 4, 2015 identified in your Draft
Comparison Methodology is Arbitrary
and Unlawful
Recommendation is to incorporate
The Honorable Joyce L. Connery
ongoing NNSA performance
Company-Specific Comments Chairman
improvement initiatives and
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Borusan 65 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700 enhancements into the existing
9. Duty Drawback and Treatment of the Yield Washington, DC 20004 implementation plans for
Loss Factor Recommendation 2014–1. This
10. Home Market Sales of Overruns and the Dear Madam Chairman:
approach would enable the Department
Ordinary Course of Trade On behalf of the Secretary, thank you to take a holistic, integrated approach to
11. Domestic Inland Freight Expenses for the opportunity to review the making the needed improvements at
12. International Freight Expenses Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Pantex.
Toscelik (DNFSB) Draft Recommendation 2015–
1, Emergency Preparedness and We appreciate the DNFSB’s
13. Billing Adjustments
Response at the Pantex Plant. The perspective and look forward to
14. Duty Drawback
15. Duty Drawback Adjustment to Cost National Nuclear Security continued positive interactions with
16. Toscelik’s Net Financial Expense Administration (NNSA) has established you and your staff to include Pantex-
Recommendation specific performance goals for the specific actions and milestones in the
[FR Doc. 2015–31188 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am] Pantex Emergency Management existing Implementation Plan for
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Program, to include improvements in Recommendation 2014–1.
the three areas highlighted by the Draft If you have any questions, please
Recommendation 2015–1. These goals contact me or Mr. Geoffrey Beausoleil,
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES are consistent with the mutually agreed- Manager, NNSA Production Office, at
SAFETY BOARD upon benefits of implementing the 865–576–0752.
DNFSB Recommendation 2014–1.
[Recommendation 2015–1] The draft Recommendation’s risk Sincerely,
assessment states: ‘‘it is not possible to Frank G. Klotz
Emergency Preparedness and
do a quantitative assessment of the risk
Response at the Pantex Plant
of these [the Pantex Emergency
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Management Program] elements to
Safety Board. provide adequate protection of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:33 Dec 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM 10DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_76911/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 13:29:18
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 13:29:18
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Fred Baker, Deborah Scott, or Robert James AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924, (202) 482-2657, and (202) 482-0649, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 76674 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR