80_FR_8762 80 FR 8730 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Provide for the Clearance of Additional Standard Western European Sovereign Single Names

80 FR 8730 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Provide for the Clearance of Additional Standard Western European Sovereign Single Names

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 32 (February 18, 2015)

Page Range8730-8731
FR Document2015-03229

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8730-8731]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74256; File No. SR-ICC-2014-21]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order 
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Provide for the Clearance of 
Additional Standard Western European Sovereign Single Names

February 11, 2015.

I. Introduction

    On December 16, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule 
change SR-ICC-2014-21 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on January 2, 2015.\3\ The Commission received one comment.\4\ For the 
reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule 
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73941 (Dec. 24, 
2014), 80 FR 75 (Jan. 2, 2015) (File No. SR-ICC-2014-21).
    \4\ See Comment from Anonymous, dated January 23, 2015, 
available at http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-icc-2014-21/icc201421-1.htm (stating ``Good Idea'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    ICC proposes to adopt rules that will provide the basis for ICC to 
clear additional credit default swap (``CDS'') contracts. Specifically, 
ICC is proposing to amend Section 26I of its Rules to provide for the 
clearance of additional Standard Western European Sovereign CDS 
contracts (collectively, ``SWES Contracts''). ICC has been approved to 
clear four SWES Contracts: the Republic of Ireland, the Italian 
Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom of Spain.\5\ The 
proposed changes to the ICC Rules would provide for the clearance of 
additional SWES Contracts, specifically the Kingdom of Belgium and the 
Republic of Austria (the ``Additional SWES Contracts'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-72941(Nov. 5, 2014), 79 FR 
67213 (Nov. 12, 2014) (File No. SR-ICC-2014-14) (order approving 
rule change to clear other Western European sovereign CDS contracts) 
(the ``Prior WES Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ICC states that these Additional SWES Contracts will be offered on 
the 2003 and 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions. ICC believes 
that the addition of these SWES Contracts will benefit the market for 
credit default swaps on Western European sovereigns by providing market 
participants the benefits of clearing, including reduction in 
counterparty risk and safeguarding of margin assets pursuant to 
clearing house rules. According to ICC, the clearing of the additional 
SWES Contracts will not require any changes in ICC's risk management 
framework (including relevant policies) or margin model. ICC represents 
that the Additional SWES Contracts have terms consistent with the other 
SWES Contracts which ICC has been approved to clear and which will be 
governed by Subchapter 26I of the ICC rules, namely the Republic of 
Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom 
of Spain.
    ICC proposes minor revisions to Subchapter 26I (Standard Western 
European Sovereign (``SWES'') Single Name) to provide for clearing the 
additional SWES Contracts. Rule 26I-102 will be modified to include the 
Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Austria in the list of specific 
Eligible SWES Reference Entities to be cleared by ICC. Additionally, in 
ICC Rule 26D-102 (Definitions), the definition of ``Eligible SES 
Reference Entity'' will be modified to correct a typographical error 
and correctly identify the reference entity for a cleared product as 
Hungary (as opposed to the Republic of Hungary).

III. Comments

    The Commission received one comment supporting approval of the 
proposed rule change. In this anonymous comment, the author expressed 
general support for the proposal but did not opine on any particular 
aspects of the proposal or offer any specific comment beyond a 
statement of general support.

IV. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \6\ directs the Commission to 
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the 
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the 
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder 
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 
of the Act \7\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a 
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate 
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent 
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to 
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the 
custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is 
responsible and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that clearing of the Additional SWES Contracts 
is consistent with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \8\ and 
regulations thereunder applicable to it, including the standards under 
Rule 17Ad-22.\9\ The proposed change will provide for clearing of 
Additional SWES Contracts in the same manner as other SWES Contracts. 
Specifically, the new contracts will be cleared, and the risk 
associated with clearing the new contracts will be appropriately 
managed, pursuant to ICC's existing margin and guaranty fund 
methodology, operational and managerial procedures, settlement 
procedures and default management policies. The Commission believes 
that the proposal is therefore designed to promote the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and 
derivative agreements, contracts and transactions cleared by ICC, to 
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in the custody or 
control of ICC, and to protect investors and the public interest, 
within the meaning of is designed to promote the prompt and accurate

[[Page 8731]]

clearance and settlement of securities transactions, consistent with 
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \11\ and the 
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2014-21) be, and hereby 
is, approved.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \13\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03229 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                8730                      Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                IV. Conclusion                                          II. Description of the Proposed Rule                  III. Comments
                                                                                                        Change                                                   The Commission received one
                                                  On the basis of the foregoing, the
                                                Commission finds that the proposal is                      ICC proposes to adopt rules that will              comment supporting approval of the
                                                                                                        provide the basis for ICC to clear                    proposed rule change. In this
                                                consistent with the requirements of the
                                                                                                        additional credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’)              anonymous comment, the author
                                                Act and in particular with the
                                                                                                        contracts. Specifically, ICC is proposing             expressed general support for the
                                                requirements of Section 17A of the Act 8
                                                                                                        to amend Section 26I of its Rules to                  proposal but did not opine on any
                                                and the rules and regulations                                                                                 particular aspects of the proposal or
                                                thereunder.                                             provide for the clearance of additional
                                                                                                        Standard Western European Sovereign                   offer any specific comment beyond a
                                                  It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to                  CDS contracts (collectively, ‘‘SWES                   statement of general support.
                                                Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the                  Contracts’’). ICC has been approved to                IV. Discussion and Commission
                                                proposed rule change (File No. SR–ICC–                  clear four SWES Contracts: the Republic               Findings
                                                2014–23) be, and hereby is, approved.10                 of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the
                                                                                                                                                                Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 6 directs
                                                  For the Commission, by the Division of                Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom
                                                                                                                                                              the Commission to approve a proposed
                                                Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated              of Spain.5 The proposed changes to the                rule change of a self-regulatory
                                                authority.11                                            ICC Rules would provide for the                       organization if the Commission finds
                                                Brent J. Fields,                                        clearance of additional SWES Contracts,               that such proposed rule change is
                                                Secretary.                                              specifically the Kingdom of Belgium                   consistent with the requirements of the
                                                                                                        and the Republic of Austria (the                      Act and the rules and regulations
                                                [FR Doc. 2015–03230 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        ‘‘Additional SWES Contracts’’).                       thereunder applicable to such self-
                                                BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                                                                                           ICC states that these Additional SWES              regulatory organization. Section
                                                                                                        Contracts will be offered on the 2003                 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 7 requires, among
                                                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 and 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives                      other things, that the rules of a clearing
                                                COMMISSION                                              Definitions. ICC believes that the                    agency are designed to promote the
                                                                                                        addition of these SWES Contracts will                 prompt and accurate clearance and
                                                                                                        benefit the market for credit default                 settlement of securities transactions
                                                [Release No. 34–74256; File No. SR–ICC–                 swaps on Western European sovereigns                  and, to the extent applicable, derivative
                                                2014–21]                                                by providing market participants the                  agreements, contracts, and transactions,
                                                                                                        benefits of clearing, including reduction             to assure the safeguarding of securities
                                                Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
                                                                                                        in counterparty risk and safeguarding of              and funds which are in the custody or
                                                Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
                                                                                                        margin assets pursuant to clearing house              control of the clearing agency or for
                                                Proposed Rule Change To Provide for
                                                                                                        rules. According to ICC, the clearing of              which it is responsible and, in general,
                                                the Clearance of Additional Standard
                                                                                                        the additional SWES Contracts will not                to protect investors and the public
                                                Western European Sovereign Single
                                                                                                        require any changes in ICC’s risk                     interest.
                                                Names                                                   management framework (including                         The Commission finds that clearing of
                                                February 11, 2015.                                      relevant policies) or margin model. ICC               the Additional SWES Contracts is
                                                                                                        represents that the Additional SWES                   consistent with the requirements of
                                                I. Introduction                                         Contracts have terms consistent with the              Section 17A of the Act 8 and regulations
                                                                                                        other SWES Contracts which ICC has                    thereunder applicable to it, including
                                                   On December 16, 2014, ICE Clear                                                                            the standards under Rule 17Ad–22.9
                                                                                                        been approved to clear and which will
                                                Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the                                                                           The proposed change will provide for
                                                                                                        be governed by Subchapter 26I of the
                                                Securities and Exchange Commission                      ICC rules, namely the Republic of                     clearing of Additional SWES Contracts
                                                (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                      Ireland, the Italian Republic, the                    in the same manner as other SWES
                                                change SR–ICC–2014–21 pursuant to                       Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom                  Contracts. Specifically, the new
                                                Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities                      of Spain.                                             contracts will be cleared, and the risk
                                                Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule                                                                     associated with clearing the new
                                                19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule                       ICC proposes minor revisions to
                                                                                                        Subchapter 26I (Standard Western                      contracts will be appropriately
                                                change was published for comment in                                                                           managed, pursuant to ICC’s existing
                                                                                                        European Sovereign (‘‘SWES’’) Single
                                                the Federal Register on January 2,                                                                            margin and guaranty fund methodology,
                                                                                                        Name) to provide for clearing the
                                                2015.3 The Commission received one                                                                            operational and managerial procedures,
                                                                                                        additional SWES Contracts. Rule 26I–
                                                comment.4 For the reasons discussed                                                                           settlement procedures and default
                                                                                                        102 will be modified to include the
                                                below, the Commission is approving the                                                                        management policies. The Commission
                                                                                                        Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic
                                                proposed rule change.                                                                                         believes that the proposal is therefore
                                                                                                        of Austria in the list of specific Eligible
                                                                                                        SWES Reference Entities to be cleared                 designed to promote the prompt and
                                                  8 15  U.S.C. 78q–1.
                                                                                                        by ICC. Additionally, in ICC Rule 26D–                accurate clearance and settlement of
                                                  9 15  U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
                                                                                                        102 (Definitions), the definition of                  securities transactions and derivative
                                                   10 In approving the proposed rule change, the
                                                                                                        ‘‘Eligible SES Reference Entity’’ will be             agreements, contracts and transactions
                                                Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
                                                efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15       modified to correct a typographical error             cleared by ICC, to assure the
                                                U.S.C. 78c(f).                                          and correctly identify the reference                  safeguarding of securities and funds in
                                                   11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
                                                                                                        entity for a cleared product as Hungary               the custody or control of ICC, and to
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                   1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
                                                                                                        (as opposed to the Republic of                        protect investors and the public interest,
                                                   2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
                                                                                                        Hungary).                                             within the meaning of is designed to
                                                   3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–73941
                                                                                                                                                              promote the prompt and accurate
                                                (Dec. 24, 2014), 80 FR 75 (Jan. 2, 2015) (File No.
                                                SR–ICC–2014–21).                                           5 See Exchange Act Release No. 34–72941(Nov. 5,
                                                                                                                                                                6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
                                                   4 See Comment from Anonymous, dated January          2014), 79 FR 67213 (Nov. 12, 2014) (File No. SR–
                                                                                                                                                                7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
                                                23, 2015, available at http://www.sec.gov/              ICC–2014–14) (order approving rule change to clear
                                                                                                                                                                8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
                                                comments/sr-icc-2014-21/icc201421-1.htm (stating        other Western European sovereign CDS contracts)
                                                ‘‘Good Idea’’).                                         (the ‘‘Prior WES Order’’).                              9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:32 Feb 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00142   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM   18FEN1


                                                                          Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices                                                       8731

                                                clearance and settlement of securities                  solicit comments on the proposed rule                 substantively identical to corresponding
                                                transactions, consistent with Section                   change from interested persons.                       rules on BZX and BYX 6 related to
                                                17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.10                                                                                    registration requirements in order to
                                                                                                        I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                                                                              provide a consistent regulatory
                                                V. Conclusion                                           Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                                                                                        the Proposed Rule Change                              approach across each of the BGM
                                                  On the basis of the foregoing, the                                                                          Affiliated Exchanges.7
                                                Commission finds that the proposal is                      The Exchange filed a proposal to                      Currently, Rule 1.5(n) defines the
                                                consistent with the requirements of the                 amend Rules 1.5, 2.3, 2.5, and 2.6                    term ‘‘Member’’ as meaning any
                                                Act and in particular with the                          related to the registration requirements              registered broker or dealer, or any
                                                requirements of Section 17A of the                      for Members of the Exchange.                          person associated with a registered
                                                Act 11 and the rules and regulations                       The text of the proposed rule change               broker or dealer, that has been admitted
                                                thereunder.                                             is available at the Exchange’s Web site               to membership in the Exchange. A
                                                  It is therefore ordered, pursuant to                  at www.batstrading.com, at the                        Member will have the status of a
                                                Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the                 principal office of the Exchange, and at              ‘‘member’’ of the Exchange as that term
                                                proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2014–                      the Commission’s Public Reference                     is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.
                                                21) be, and hereby is, approved.13                      Room.                                                 The Exchange is proposing, however, to
                                                  For the Commission, by the Division of                II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                    delete ‘‘or any person associated with a
                                                Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated              Statement of the Purpose of, and                      registered broker or dealer’’ from the
                                                authority.14                                            Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                rule text, as such phrase is not
                                                Brent J. Fields,                                        Change                                                contained in corresponding BZX and
                                                Secretary.                                                                                                    BYX rules (i.e., Rule 1.5(n)) and because
                                                                                                           In its filing with the Commission, the
                                                [FR Doc. 2015–03229 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]             Exchange included statements                          the Exchange no longer believes that
                                                BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                  concerning the purpose of and basis for               this language is necessary. The
                                                                                                        the proposed rule change and discussed                Exchange is also proposing to amend
                                                                                                        any comments it received on the                       the rule text such that Membership may
                                                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                 proposed rule change. The text of these               be granted to a sole proprietor,
                                                COMMISSION                                              statements may be examined at the                     partnership, corporation, limited
                                                [Release No. 34–74254; File No. SR–EDGA–                places specified in Item IV below. The                liability company or other organization
                                                2015–06]                                                Exchange has prepared summaries, set                  which is a registered broker or dealer
                                                                                                        forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of               pursuant to Section 15 of the Act, and
                                                Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA                     the most significant parts of such                    which has been approved by the
                                                Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and                    statements.                                           Exchange, language which is currently
                                                Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed                                                                         included in Rule 2.3(a), which, as
                                                Rule Change to Rules 1.5, 2.3, 2.5, and                 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     described below, the Exchange is
                                                2.6 Related to the Registration                         Statement of the Purpose of, and                      proposing to delete in order to further
                                                Requirements for Members of EDGA                        Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                align Exchange rules with BZX and BYX
                                                Exchange, Inc.                                          Change                                                1.5(n).
                                                                                                        1. Purpose                                               The Exchange is also proposing to
                                                February 11, 2015.                                                                                            delete the definition of ‘‘Principal’’ from
                                                   Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                     The Exchange proposes to amend the                 Rule 1.5(t), which will instead be
                                                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                    various Exchange rules related to the                 defined in the proposed changes to
                                                ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                  registration requirements on the                      paragraph (d) of Interpretation and
                                                notice is hereby given that on January                  Exchange in order to make the                         Policy .01 to Rule 2.5, which are further
                                                30, 2015, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the                      Exchange’s registration requirements                  described below. Currently, the term
                                                ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the                substantively identical to the                        principal means persons associated with
                                                Securities and Exchange Commission                      corresponding rules on BATS Exchange,                 a member who are actively engaged in
                                                (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                      Inc. (‘‘BZX’’) and BATS Y-Exchange,                   the management of the member’s
                                                change as described in Items I and II                   Inc. (‘‘BYX’’), as further described                  securities business, including
                                                below, which Items have been prepared                   below. Earlier this year, the Exchange                supervision, solicitation, conduct of
                                                by the Exchange. The Exchange has                       and its affiliate, EDGX Exchange, Inc.                business or the training of persons
                                                designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-                    (‘‘EDGX’’), received approval to effect a             associated with a Member for any of
                                                controversial’’ proposed rule change                    merger (the ‘‘Merger’’) of the Exchange’s             these functions. Such persons shall
                                                pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the                  parent company, Direct Edge Holdings                  include sole proprietors, officers,
                                                Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)                         LLC, with BATS Global Markets, Inc.,                  partners, managers of business offices
                                                thereunder,4 which renders it effective                 the parent of BZX and BYX (together                   engaged in such functions, and directors
                                                upon filing with the Commission. The                    with BZX, EDGA, and EDGX, the ‘‘BGM                   of corporations. The Exchange is
                                                Commission is publishing this notice to                 Affiliated Exchanges’’).5 In the context              proposing to add the text ‘‘(Reserved)’’
                                                                                                        of the Merger, the BGM Affiliated                     to the rule text in order to maintain the
                                                  10 15  U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).                         Exchanges are working to align certain                current paragraph numbering within
                                                  11 15  U.S.C. 78q–1.                                  system and regulatory functionality,                  Rule 1.5. The proposed new definition
                                                   12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
                                                                                                        retaining only intended differences                   for principal will be discussed below.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                   13 In approving the proposed rule change, the

                                                Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
                                                                                                        between the BGM Affiliated Exchanges.                    The Exchange intends to consolidate
                                                efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15       Thus, the proposal set forth below is                 its registration requirements in Rule 2.5
                                                U.S.C. 78c(f).                                          intended to amend Rules 1.5, 2.3, 2.5,
                                                   14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
                                                                                                        and 2.6 to make such Rules                              6 See BZX and BYX Rules 1.5, 2.3, 2.5, and 2.6.
                                                   1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
                                                                                                                                                                7 The Exchange notes that EDGX intends to file
                                                   2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                     5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71449    a proposal very similar to this proposal that will
                                                   3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
                                                                                                        (January 30, 2014), 79 FR 6961 (February 5, 2014)     align the rules related to registration requirements
                                                   4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).                       (SR–EDGX–2013–043; SR–EDGA–2013–034).                 across each of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges.



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:32 Feb 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00143   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM    18FEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-16 11:10:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-16 11:10:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 8730 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR