80 FR 8866 - Panola Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 33 (February 19, 2015)

Page Range		8866-8866
FR Document		2015-03441

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8866]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR15-14-000]


Panola Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory 
Order

    Take notice that on February 10, 2015, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2014), Panola Pipeline 
Company, LLC (Panola or Petitioner), filed a petition for declaratory 
order seeking approval of priority service and the proposed tariff rate 
structure and terms of service for a planned expansion of Panola's 
pipeline system, as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on March 10, 2015.

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03441 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

8866 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 33 / Thursday, February 19, 2015 / Notices

accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and Online service, please email 1. Require the MISO–PJM cross-
385.2010. FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call border transmission planning process to
Dated: February 12, 2015. (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call run concurrently with the MISO and
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
(202) 502–8659. PJM regional transmission planning
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time cycles, rather than after those regional
Deputy Secretary.
on March 10, 2015. planning cycles.
[FR Doc. 2015–03444 Filed 2–18–15; 8:45 am] 2. Require MISO and PJM to develop
Dated: February 12, 2015.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P and use a single model that uses the
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
same assumptions in the cross-border
Deputy Secretary. transmission planning process. Until the
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [FR Doc. 2015–03441 Filed 2–18–15; 8:45 am] joint model is developed, require that
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P there is consistency between the PJM
Federal Energy Regulatory
and MISO planning analysis and that
Commission
both entities are consistent in their
[Docket No. OR15–14–000] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY application of reliability criteria and
modeling assumptions.
Panola Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice Federal Energy Regulatory 3. Require MISO and PJM to use a
of Petition for Declaratory Order Commission single common set of criteria to evaluate
cross-border market efficiency projects.
Take notice that on February 10, 2015, [Docket No. EL13–88–000] 4. Require MISO and PJM to amend
pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of the Federal the criteria to evaluate cross-border
Energy Regulatory Commission’s Northern Indiana Public Service market efficiency projects to address all
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Company v. Midcontinent Independent known benefits, including avoidance of
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2014), System Operator, Inc. and PJM future market-to-market (M2M)
Panola Pipeline Company, LLC (Panola Interconnection, LLC; Notice of payments made to reallocate short-term
or Petitioner), filed a petition for Request for Comments transmission capacity in the real-time
declaratory order seeking approval of operation of the system.
priority service and the proposed tariff February 12, 2015.
5. Require MISO and PJM to have a
rate structure and terms of service for a On September 11, 2013, Northern
process for joint planning and cost
planned expansion of Panola’s pipeline Indiana Public Service Company
allocation of lower voltage and lower
system, as more fully explained in the (NIPSCO) filed a complaint against
cost cross-border upgrades.
petition. Midcontinent Independent System 6. Require MISO and PJM to improve
Any person desiring to intervene or to Operator, Inc. (MISO) and PJM the processes within the MISO–PJM
protest this filing must file in Interconnection, LLC (PJM). NIPSCO JOA with respect to new generator
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of requested that the Commission order interconnections and generation
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and MISO and PJM to reform the retirements.
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). interregional planning process of the 7. Explain the relationship between
Protests will be considered by the Joint Operating Agreement between the cross-border transmission planning
Commission in determining the MISO and PJM (MISO–PJM JOA).1 On process (and approval of new
appropriate action to be taken, but will December 18, 2014, the Commission transmission projects) and persistent
not serve to make protestants parties to issued an order directing Commission M2M payments being made between the
the proceeding. Any person wishing to staff to convene a technical conference RTOs. Are persistent M2M payments a
become a party must file a notice of to explore issues raised in the good indicator of the need for new
intervention or motion to intervene, as Complaint related to the MISO–PJM transmission?
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or JOA and the MISO–PJM seam. The 8. NIPSCO provides an estimate of
protests must be filed on or before the Commission also directed Commission M2M payments on pages 23–24 of its
comment date. Anyone filing a motion staff to issue a request for comments on Complaint. Please comment on these
to intervene or protest must serve a copy these issues prior to the technical estimates and provide information on
of that document on the Petitioner. conference to inform the technical other estimates of M2M payments,
The Commission encourages conference discussion.2 including whether PJM, MISO and the
electronic submission of protests and Shown below is the list of questions market monitors have identified trends
interventions in lieu of paper using the for which Commission staff seeks in M2M payments.
‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. comment. The questions cover the six 9. Please provide examples of
Persons unable to file electronically reforms that NIPSCO recommends to the transmission projects that have been
should submit an original and 5 copies cross-border transmission planning considered under the cross-border
of the protest or intervention to the process that occurs under the MISO– transmission planning process for the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, PJM JOA, as well as certain additional purpose of mitigating congestion and/or
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC issues. Commenters should discuss the constraints that lead to persistent M2M
20426. potential benefits and/or drawbacks, payments, but that have not been
This filing is accessible on-line at cost concerns, and technical feasibility developed. Provide the reason the
http://www.ferc.gov, using the of implementing the following reforms project was not developed.
and how long the reforms would take to
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for Interested parties should submit
review in the Commission’s Public implement if adopted. comments on or before March 16, 2015.
Reference Room in Washington, DC. Reply comments must be filed on or
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 1 NIPSCO Complaint, Docket No. EL13–88–000 before March 31, 2015. Comments
Web site that enables subscribers to (filed Sept. 11, 2013). should be provided by question as
2 Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v.
receive email notification when a enumerated above.
Midcontinent Indep. Sys. Operator, Inc. and PJM
document is added to a subscribed Interconnection, LLC, 149 FERC ¶ 61,248, at P 35 ADDRESSES: Parties may submit
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC (2014). comments, identified by Docket No.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:58 Feb 18, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM 19FEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-16 11:12:32
Document Modified: 2018-02-16 11:12:32

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Dates		5:00 p.m. Eastern time on March 10, 2015.
FR Citation		80 FR 8866

80 FR 8866 - Panola Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYFederal Energy Regulatory Commission

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 33 (February 19, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission