81 FR 10762 - Safety Zone; Newtown Creek, Queens, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 41 (March 2, 2016)

Page Range		10762-10764
FR Document		2016-04474

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters of Newtown Creek between the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge (mile 1.3) and the entrance to Dutch Kills. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by a sunken vessel adjacent to the Federal navigation channel. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port New York.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10762-10764]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04474]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0100]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Newtown Creek, Queens, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters of Newtown Creek between the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge 
(mile 1.3) and the entrance to Dutch Kills. The safety zone is needed 
to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from 
potential hazards created by a sunken vessel adjacent to the Federal 
navigation channel. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is 
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
New York.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 2, 2016 
through March 5, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from February 3, 2016 through March 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0100 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Coast Guard Sector New York Waterways 
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 718-354-4195, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because a vessel sank adjacent to the Federal 
navigation channel at the Sims Hugo Neu facility on Newtown Creek and 
immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards 
associated with removing cargo from the vessel and refloating the 
vessel. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must 
establish this safety zone by February 3, 2016.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because 
immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards 
associated with removing cargo from the vessel and refloating the 
vessel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with 
refloating a sunken barge adjacent to the Federal navigation channel 
starting February 4, 2016 will be a safety concern for anyone between 
the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge (mile 1.3) and the confluence of Newtown 
Creek and Dutch Kills during this process. This rule is needed to 
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable 
waters within the safety zone while cargo is removed from the vessel 
and the vessel is refloated. Therefore, this rule will remain in effect 
for the time stated herein but will be cancelled if response activities 
are finished cease before March 5, 2016. The preliminary estimate for 
completion of the cargo removal and refloating the vessel is February 
6, 2016. This TFR provides for an extended enforcement period in case 
of unforeseen circumstances that prevent the contractors from 
completing the work within their initial estimated timeline.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 7 a.m. on Wednesday, 
February 3, 2016 through 11:59 p.m. on Saturday, March 5, 2016. The 
safety zone will cover all navigable waters between the Greenpoint 
Avenue Bridge (mile 1.3) and the confluence of Newtown Creek and Dutch 
Kills. The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, 
vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters while the 
vessel is being refloated. No vessel or person will be permitted to 
enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a 
designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive order related to rulemaking.

[[Page 10763]]

Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and 
Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
will be able to safely transit through this safety zone which will 
impact a small designated area of Newtown Creek in Queens, NY after 
making passing arrangements with the work vessels while cargo is being 
removed from the sunken barge during daylight hours on February 3, 
2016. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels 
to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone lasting less than 31 days that will 
prohibit entry between the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge (mile 1.3) and the 
entrance to Dutch Kills on Newtown Creek being used by personnel to 
remove cargo from a sunken vessel and to refloat the vessel. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination will be in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;

[[Page 10764]]

Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0100 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0100  Safety Zone: Newtown Creek, Queens, NY

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
U.S. navigable waters of Newtown Creek between the Greenpoint Avenue 
Bridge (mile 1.3) and the entrance to Dutch Kills
    (b) Enforcement period. The safety zone described in paragraph (a) 
of this section will be enforced from February 3, 2016 until March 5, 
2016, unless terminated sooner by the COTP.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
33 CFR 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated on 
scene representative.
    (3) A ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State or local law 
enforcement officer designated by or assisting the COTP to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators must contact the COTP via the Command Center 
to obtain permission to enter or operate within the safety zone. The 
COTP may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at (718) 354-4353. Vessel 
operators given permission to enter or operate within the safety zone 
must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP, via the 
Command Center or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: Februrary 3, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2016-04474 Filed 3-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 10763

Below we summarize our analyses jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
based on a number of these statutes and concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
Executive orders, and we discuss First compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Amendment rights of protestors. listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
A. Regulatory Planning and Review Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
direct agencies to assess the costs and who enforce, or otherwise determine
benefits of available regulatory compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
alternatives and, if regulation is the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
necessary, to select regulatory Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
approaches that maximize net benefits. and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
importance of quantifying both costs Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in
and benefits, of reducing costs, of annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
harmonizing rules, and of promoting responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
flexibility. This rule has not been wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
by the Office of Management and small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
Budget. about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a safety
This regulatory action determination of the Coast Guard. zone lasting less than 31 days that will
is based on the size, location, duration, prohibit entry between the Greenpoint
and time-of-year of the safety zone. C. Collection of Information
Avenue Bridge (mile 1.3) and the
Vessel traffic will be able to safely This rule will not call for a new entrance to Dutch Kills on Newtown
transit through this safety zone which collection of information under the Creek being used by personnel to
will impact a small designated area of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 remove cargo from a sunken vessel and
Newtown Creek in Queens, NY after U.S.C. 3501–3520). to refloat the vessel. It is categorically
making passing arrangements with the excluded from further review under
work vessels while cargo is being D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
removed from the sunken barge during Commandant Instruction. An
daylight hours on February 3, 2016. A rule has implications for federalism
environmental analysis checklist
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue under Executive Order 13132,
supporting this determination and a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
Categorical Exclusion Determination
FM marine channel 16 about the zone effect on the States, on the relationship
will be in the docket where indicated
and the rule allows vessels to seek between the national government and
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
permission to enter the zone. the States, or on the distribution of
comments or information that may lead
power and responsibilities among the
B. Impact on Small Entities to the discovery of a significant
various levels of government. We have
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of environmental impact from this rule.
analyzed this rule under that Order and
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent G. Protest Activities
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism
the potential impact of regulations on The Coast Guard respects the First
principles and preemption requirements
small entities during rulemaking. The Amendment rights of protesters.
described in Executive Order 13132.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal Protesters are asked to contact the
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, coordinate protest activities so that your
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial message can be received without
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian jeopardizing the safety or security of
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the people, places or vessels.
605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes, List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and
substantial number of small entities. Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
responsibilities between the Federal
While some owners or operators of (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
Government and Indian tribes. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety requirements, Security measures,
believe this rule has implications for
zone may be small entities, for the Waterways.
federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR For the reasons discussed in the
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
economic impact on any vessel owner above. CFR part 165 as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In continues to read as follows:
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Mar 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1

10764 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

Department of Homeland Security Delegation provide readjustment counseling or Department of Defense medical
No. 0170.1. services to broader groups of veterans, records and which will not disclose
■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0100 to read as members of the Armed Forces, such records without either the
follows: including a member of a reserve veteran’s or member’s of the Armed
component of the Armed Forces, and Forces, including a member of a reserve
§ 165.T01–0100 Safety Zone: Newtown family members of such veterans and component of the Armed Forces,
Creek, Queens, NY members. This final rule adopts as final voluntary, signed authorization, or a
(a) Location. The following area is a the regulatory criteria to conform to the specific exception permitting their
temporary safety zone: All U.S. 2013 Act, to include new and revised release.’’ This sentence now reads
navigable waters of Newtown Creek definitions. ‘‘Benefits under this section are
between the Greenpoint Avenue Bridge DATES: Effective date: March 2, 2016. furnished solely by VA Vet Centers,
(mile 1.3) and the entrance to Dutch which maintain confidential records
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kills Michael Fisher, Readjustment independent from any other VA or
(b) Enforcement period. The safety Counseling Service (10RCS), Veterans Department of Defense medical records
zone described in paragraph (a) of this Health Administration, Department of and which will not disclose such
section will be enforced from February Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue records without the voluntary signed
3, 2016 until March 5, 2016, unless NW., Washington, DC 20420; (202) 461– authorization of the veteran or member
terminated sooner by the COTP. 6525. (This is not a toll-free number.) of the Armed Forces (including a
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with member of a reserve component of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
the general regulations in 33 CFR Armed Forces), or where a specific
4, 2015, VA published in the Federal
165.23, entry into, transiting, or exception permits disclosure.’’
Register an interim final rule that
anchoring within this safety zone is Based on the rationale set forth in the
implemented the National Defense
prohibited unless authorized by the interim final rule and in this document,
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013,
COTP or a designated on scene VA is adopting the provisions of the
Public Law 112–239 (Jan. 2, 2013) (the
representative. interim final rule as a final rule making
2013 Act). 80 FR 46197. VA invited
(3) A ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of the interested persons to submit comments only technical edits.
COTP is any Coast Guard on the interim final rule on or before
commissioned, warrant or petty officer Administrative Procedure Act
October 5, 2015, and we received one
or a Federal, State or local law comment. The commenter questioned In accordance with U.S.C. 553(b)(B)
enforcement officer designated by or why the rulemaking is including and (d)(3), the Secretary of Veterans
assisting the COTP to act on his behalf. individuals who remotely control Affairs concluded that there was good
(4) Vessel operators must contact the unmanned aerial vehicles as individuals cause to publish this rule without prior
COTP via the Command Center to who are entitled to receive readjustment opportunity for public comment and to
obtain permission to enter or operate counseling services and how has VA publish this rule with an immediate
within the safety zone. The COTP may and the Department of Defense assessed effective date. This final rule
be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at the need for such services for this group incorporates a specific program
(718) 354–4353. Vessel operators given of individuals. The requirement to requirement mandated by Congress in
permission to enter or operate within provide readjustment counseling to Public Law 112–239. The Secretary
the safety zone must comply with all individuals who remotely control finds that it is impracticable and
directions given to them by the COTP, unmanned aerial vehicles is mandated contrary to the public interest to delay
via the Command Center or an on-scene by Public Law 112–239, which is this rule for the purpose of soliciting
representative. implemented by this rulemaking. We do advance public comment or to have a
Dated: Februrary 3, 2016. not make any changes based on this delayed effective date. This rule will
M.H. Day, comment. increase the pool of individuals who are
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Finally, we make a technical edit to eligible to receive mental health care at
Port New York. paragraphs (b) and (e) to ensure that Vet Centers. This rule will also increase
[FR Doc. 2016–04474 Filed 3–1–16; 8:45 am] these provisions are easier to access to much needed mental health
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
understand. As amended in the interim care services in Vet Centers. For the
final rule, the first sentence of the above reason, the Secretary, through this
introductory paragraph to paragraph (b) rulemaking, adopts as final an interim
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS read ‘‘With the veteran’s or member’s of final rule in which we provided prior
AFFAIRS the Armed Forces, including a member notice and opportunity for the public to
of a reserve component of the Armed comment.
38 CFR Part 17 Forces, consent, VA will assist in
Effect of Rulemaking
obtaining proof of eligibility.’’ We
RIN 2900–AP21 determined that this amendatory Title 38 of the Code of Federal
language was grammatically incorrect. Regulations, as revised by this final
Vet Centers
We are now amending this sentence to rulemaking, represents VA’s
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. read ‘‘With the consent of the veteran or implementation of its legal authority on
ACTION: Final rule. member of the Armed Forces, including this subject. Other than future
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

a member of a reserve component of the amendments to this regulation or
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Armed Forces, VA will assist in governing statutes, no contrary guidance
Affairs (VA) adopts as final an interim obtaining proof of eligibility.’’ The first or procedures are authorized. All
final rule that amends its medical sentence of paragraph (e) was similarly existing or subsequent VA guidance
regulation that governs Vet Center incorrect and read ‘‘Benefits under this must be read to conform with this
services. The National Defense section are furnished solely by VA Vet rulemaking if possible or, if not
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Centers, which maintain confidential possible, such guidance is superseded
(the 2013 Act) requires Vet Centers to records independent from any other VA by this rulemaking.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Mar 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1

Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:04:09
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:04:09

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from March 2, 2016 through March 5, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from February 3, 2016 through March 2, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Coast Guard Sector New York Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 718-354-4195, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 10762
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 10762 - Safety Zone; Newtown Creek, Queens, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 41 (March 2, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard