81 FR 10866 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 41 (March 2, 2016)
Administration for Children and Families
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 41 (March 2, 2016)
| Page Range | 10866-10867 | |
| FR Document | 2016-04582 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 10866-10867] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-04582] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative. OMB No.: New Collection. Description: The Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative is sponsored by the Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Capacity Building Collaborative includes three centers (Center for States, Center for Tribes, Center for Courts) funded by the Children's Bureau to provide national child welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and technical assistance services to State, Tribal and Territorial public child welfare agencies and Court Improvement Programs (CIP). The Centers offer a wide array of services including, but not limited to: Web-based content and resources, product development and dissemination, self-directed and group-based training, virtual learning and peer networking events, and tailored consultation and coaching. During the project period the Centers' services will be evaluated by both Center-specific evaluations and a Cross-Center Evaluation. The Center-specific evaluations are designed to collect data on Center-specific processes and outcomes. The Cross-Center Evaluation is designed to respond to a set of cross-cutting evaluation questions posed by the Children's Bureau. The Cross-Center Evaluation will examine: The extent to which key partners across and within the Centers are collaborating; whether the capacity building service interventions offered by the Centers are evaluable; the degree to which Centers follow common protocols; whether service interventions are delivered or performed as designed; how satisfied recipients are with the services received; how effective the service interventions were; which service approaches were most effective and under what conditions; and the costs of services. The Cross-Center Evaluation is utilizing a longitudinal mixed methods approach to evaluate the Centers' services as they develop and mature over the course of the study period. Multiple data collection strategies will be used to efficiently capture quantitative and qualitative data to enable analyses that address each evaluation question. Proposed Cross-Center Evaluation data sources for this effort include (1) satisfaction surveys to assess recipients' satisfaction with services, such as the Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey; (2) a leadership interview, administered to all State child welfare directors, Tribal child welfare directors, and CIP coordinators that are receiving services from the Centers; and (3) a collaboration survey, an annual web-based survey administered to the directors and staff of the three Centers. Center-specific data sources for this effort include (1) assessment tools such as the Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker Interview; and (2) service-specific feedback forms, such as the Center for States Intensive Projects instrument and the Center for Courts CQI Workshops instrument. Respondents: Respondents of data collection instruments will include (1) child welfare and judicial professionals that use the Centers' Web pages, products, and online courses, that participate in virtual or in-person trainings or peer events, and that receive brief or intensive tailored services from the Centers; (2) State child welfare directors, Tribal child welfare directors, and CIP coordinators that are receiving services from the Centers; and (3) the directors and staff of the three Capacity Building Centers. The proposed data collection will span four years. Annual Burden Estimates ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Average burden Instrument Annual number responses per hours per Total annual of respondents respondent response burden hours ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webpages and Products Satisfaction Survey....... 1,560 1 .08 125 Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey \1\.... 625 1 .33 206 Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey \2\.... 900 1 .08 72 Webinars, Events, and In-Person Meetings 5,333 1 .08 427 Satisfaction Survey............................ Assessment & Capacity Building Plan Satisfaction 450 1 .066 30 Survey......................................... Center for Tribes Contact Form.................. 50 1 .05 3 Center for Tribes Demographic Survey............ 20 1 1.75 35 Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker 20 1 1.25 25 Interview...................................... Tribal Organizational Assessment Community 16 1 1.25 20 Provider Interview............................. Tribal Organizational Assessment Community 12 1 1.0 12 Member/Elder Interview......................... Tribal Organizational Assessment Family 14 1 1.0 14 Interview...................................... Center for States Information and Referral 12 1 .05 1 Survey......................................... Center for States Intensive Projects Survey..... 330 2 .33 218 Center for States Constituency Groups Surveys... 400 2 .33 264 Center for States Brief Tailored Services Survey 125 1 .33 42 CIP Annual Meeting Survey....................... 200 1 .13 26 Center for Courts CQI Workshops................. 48 1 .17 8 Leadership Interview--States and Territories.... 13 2 1 26 Leadership Interview--CIPs...................... 13 2 1 26 Leadership Interview--Tribes.................... 8 2 1.25 20 Leadership Interview Part II--Tribes............ 8 2 .67 11 Annual Collaboration Survey..................... 230 1 .36 83 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For Learning Experiences that consist of a single event (e.g. on-line session or in-person training). \2\ For more intensive Learning Experiences that require administration of multiple surveys over a series of events, modules, or units. [[Page 10867]] Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,694. Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. Email address: [email protected]. OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202-395- 6974, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2016-04582 Filed 3-1-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
![10866 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2016 / Notices
Centers for Disease Control and services including, but not limited to: quantitative and qualitative data to
Prevention, and Agency for Toxic Web-based content and resources, enable analyses that address each
Substances and Disease Registry. product development and evaluation question. Proposed Cross-
dissemination, self-directed and group- Center Evaluation data sources for this
Elaine L. Baker,
based training, virtual learning and peer effort include (1) satisfaction surveys to
Director, Management Analysis and Service
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
networking events, and tailored assess recipients’ satisfaction with
Prevention. consultation and coaching. During the services, such as the Learning
[FR Doc. 2016–04589 Filed 3–1–16; 8:45 am]
project period the Centers’ services will Experiences Satisfaction Survey; (2) a
be evaluated by both Center-specific leadership interview, administered to
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
evaluations and a Cross-Center all State child welfare directors, Tribal
Evaluation. The Center-specific child welfare directors, and CIP
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND evaluations are designed to collect data coordinators that are receiving services
HUMAN SERVICES on Center-specific processes and from the Centers; and (3) a collaboration
outcomes. The Cross-Center Evaluation survey, an annual web-based survey
Administration for Children and is designed to respond to a set of cross- administered to the directors and staff of
Families cutting evaluation questions posed by the three Centers. Center-specific data
the Children’s Bureau. The Cross-Center sources for this effort include (1)
Submission for OMB Review; Evaluation will examine: The extent to assessment tools such as the Tribal
Comment Request which key partners across and within Organizational Assessment Caseworker
Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare the Centers are collaborating; whether Interview; and (2) service-specific
Capacity Building Collaborative. the capacity building service feedback forms, such as the Center for
OMB No.: New Collection. interventions offered by the Centers are States Intensive Projects instrument and
Description: The Evaluation of the evaluable; the degree to which Centers the Center for Courts CQI Workshops
Child Welfare Capacity Building follow common protocols; whether instrument.
Collaborative is sponsored by the service interventions are delivered or Respondents: Respondents of data
Children’s Bureau, Administration for performed as designed; how satisfied collection instruments will include (1)
Children and Families of the U.S. recipients are with the services child welfare and judicial professionals
Department of Health and Human received; how effective the service that use the Centers’ Web pages,
Services. The Capacity Building interventions were; which service products, and online courses, that
Collaborative includes three centers approaches were most effective and participate in virtual or in-person
(Center for States, Center for Tribes, under what conditions; and the costs of trainings or peer events, and that receive
Center for Courts) funded by the services. brief or intensive tailored services from
Children’s Bureau to provide national The Cross-Center Evaluation is the Centers; (2) State child welfare
child welfare expertise and evidence- utilizing a longitudinal mixed methods directors, Tribal child welfare directors,
informed training and technical approach to evaluate the Centers’ and CIP coordinators that are receiving
assistance services to State, Tribal and services as they develop and mature services from the Centers; and (3) the
Territorial public child welfare agencies over the course of the study period. directors and staff of the three Capacity
and Court Improvement Programs (CIP). Multiple data collection strategies will Building Centers. The proposed data
The Centers offer a wide array of be used to efficiently capture collection will span four years.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Average
Annual Number of burden Total annual
Instrument number of responses per hours per burden hours
respondents respondent response
Webpages and Products Satisfaction Survey ................................................. 1,560 1 .08 125
Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey 1 .................................................... 625 1 .33 206
Learning Experiences Satisfaction Survey 2 .................................................... 900 1 .08 72
Webinars, Events, and In-Person Meetings Satisfaction Survey .................... 5,333 1 .08 427
Assessment & Capacity Building Plan Satisfaction Survey ............................ 450 1 .066 30
Center for Tribes Contact Form ....................................................................... 50 1 .05 3
Center for Tribes Demographic Survey ........................................................... 20 1 1.75 35
Tribal Organizational Assessment Caseworker Interview ............................... 20 1 1.25 25
Tribal Organizational Assessment Community Provider Interview ................. 16 1 1.25 20
Tribal Organizational Assessment Community Member/Elder Interview ........ 12 1 1.0 12
Tribal Organizational Assessment Family Interview ........................................ 14 1 1.0 14
Center for States Information and Referral Survey ......................................... 12 1 .05 1
Center for States Intensive Projects Survey ................................................... 330 2 .33 218
Center for States Constituency Groups Surveys ............................................ 400 2 .33 264
Center for States Brief Tailored Services Survey ........................................... 125 1 .33 42
CIP Annual Meeting Survey ............................................................................ 200 1 .13 26
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Center for Courts CQI Workshops .................................................................. 48 1 .17 8
Leadership Interview—States and Territories ................................................. 13 2 1 26
Leadership Interview—CIPs ............................................................................ 13 2 1 26
Leadership Interview—Tribes .......................................................................... 8 2 1.25 20
Leadership Interview Part II—Tribes ............................................................... 8 2 .67 11
Annual Collaboration Survey ........................................................................... 230 1 .36 83
1 For Learning Experiences that consist of a single event (e.g. on-line session or in-person training).
2 For more intensive Learning Experiences that require administration of multiple surveys over a series of events, modules, or units.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:10 Mar 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_10907/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 2, 2016 / Notices 10867
Estimated Total Annual Burden DATES: Submit either electronic or comments only as a written/paper
Hours: 1,694. written comments on the collection of submission. You should submit two
Additional Information: Copies of the information by May 2, 2016. copies total. One copy will include the
proposed collection may be obtained by ADDRESSES: You may submit comments information you claim to be confidential
writing to the Administration for as follows: with a heading or cover note that states
Children and Families, Office of ‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 Electronic Submissions CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION’’. The
L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, Submit electronic comments in the Agency will review this copy, including
DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports following way: the claimed confidential information, in
Clearance Officer. All requests should • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// its consideration of comments. The
be identified by the title of the www.regulations.gov. Follow the second copy, which will have the
information collection. Email address: instructions for submitting comments. claimed confidential information
OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. Comments submitted electronically, redacted/blacked out, will be available
OMB Comment: OMB is required to including attachments, to http:// for public viewing and posted on http://
make a decision concerning the www.regulations.gov will be posted to www.regulations.gov. Submit both
collection of information between 30 the docket unchanged. Because your copies to the Division of Dockets
and 60 days after publication of this comment will be made public, you are Management. If you do not wish your
document in the Federal Register. solely responsible for ensuring that your name and contact information to be
Therefore, a comment is best assured of comment does not include any made publicly available, you can
having its full effect if OMB receives it confidential information that you or a provide this information on the cover
within 30 days of publication. Written third party may not wish to be posted, sheet and not in the body of your
comments and recommendations for the such as medical information, your or comments and you must identify this
proposed information collection should anyone else’s Social Security number, or information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
be sent directly to the following: Office confidential business information, such information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
of Management and Budget, Paperwork as a manufacturing process. Please note will not be disclosed except in
Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–6974, that if you include your name, contact accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
Attn: Desk Officer for the information, or other information that applicable disclosure law. For more
Administration for Children and identifies you in the body of your information about FDA’s posting of
Families. comments, that information will be comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
posted on http://www.regulations.gov. 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
Robert Sargis, • If you want to submit a comment the information at: http://www.fda.gov/
Reports Clearance Officer. with confidential information that you regulatoryinformation/dockets/
[FR Doc. 2016–04582 Filed 3–1–16; 8:45 am] do not wish to be made available to the default.htm.
BILLING CODE P public, submit the comment as a Docket: For access to the docket to
written/paper submission and in the read background documents or the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper electronic and written/paper comments
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). received, go to http://
HUMAN SERVICES www.regulations.gov and insert the
Written/Paper Submissions
docket number, found in brackets in the
Food and Drug Administration Submit written/paper submissions as heading of this document, into the
[Docket No. FDA–2016–N–0538] follows: ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Agency Information Collection written/paper submissions): Division of Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
Activities; Proposed Collection; Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Comment Request; Animation in and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
• For written/paper comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, and Drug Administration, 8455
submitted to the Division of Dockets
HHS. Colesville Rd., COLE–14526, Silver
Management, FDA will post your
Spring, MD 20993–0002, PRAStaff@
ACTION: Notice. comment, as well as any attachments,
fda.hhs.gov.
except for information submitted,
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug marked and identified, as confidential, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Administration (FDA) is announcing an if submitted as detailed in PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
opportunity for public comment on the ‘‘Instructions.’’ Agencies must obtain approval from the
proposed collection of certain Instructions: All submissions received Office of Management and Budget
information by the Agency. Under the must include the Docket No. FDA– (OMB) for each collection of
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the 2016–N–0538 for ‘‘Animation in Direct- information they conduct or sponsor.
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to to-Consumer Advertising.’’ Received ‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
publish notice in the Federal Register comments will be placed in the docket in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
concerning each proposed collection of and, except for those submitted as 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
information and to allow 60 days for ‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly or requirements that members of the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
public comment in response to the viewable at http://www.regulations.gov public submit reports, keep records, or
notice. This notice solicits comments on or at the Division of Dockets provide information to a third party.
research entitled ‘‘Animation in Direct- Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
to-Consumer Advertising.’’ This study Monday through Friday. U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
will examine how animation affects the • Confidential Submissions—To Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
comprehension of direct-to-consumer submit a comment with confidential the Federal Register concerning each
(DTC) television advertisements for information that you do not wish to be proposed collection of information
prescription drugs. made publicly available, submit your before submitting the collection to OMB
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:10 Mar 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_10907/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:04:15
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:04:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 10866 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR