81 FR 11174 - Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the People's Republic of China, and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 42 (March 3, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 42 (March 3, 2016)
| Page Range | 11174-11177 | |
| FR Document | 2016-04699 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 11174-11177] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-04699] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-602-807, A-351-842, A-560-828, A-570-022, A-471-807] Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the People's Republic of China, and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (the ITC), the Department is issuing antidumping duty orders on certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the People's Republic of China (PRC), and Portugal. Also, as explained in this notice, the Department is amending its final affirmative determinations with respect to Brazil and Indonesia. DATES: Effective Date: March 3, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Wang at (202) 482-6231 (Australia), Julia Hancock at (202) 482-1394 (Brazil), Blaine Wiltse at (202) 482-6345 (Indonesia), Stephanie Moore at (202) 482-3692 (PRC), or Kabir Archuletta at (202) 482-2593 (Portugal), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.210(c), on January 20, 2016, the Department published its affirmative final determinations in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal.\1\ On February 22, 2016, the ITC notified the Department of its affirmative determinations that an industry in the United States is materially injured within the meaning of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by reason of the LTFV imports of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal and its determination that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to imports of subject merchandise from Australia that are subject to the Department's affirmative critical circumstances finding.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, In Part, 81 FR 3108 (January 20, 2016) (Australia Final); Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 3115 (January 20, 2016) (Brazil Final); Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; 81 FR 3101 (January 20, 2016) (Indonesia Final); Certain Uncoated Paper From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 3112 (January 20, 2016) (PRC Final); and Certain Uncoated Paper From Portugal: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 3105 (January 20, 2016) (Portugal Final). \2\ See Letter to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, from Meredith Broadbent, Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission, regarding certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal (February 22, 2016) (ITC Letter). See also Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal, USITC Investigation Nos. 701-TA-528-529 and 731-TA-1264-1268 (Final), USITC Publication 4592 (February 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Orders The scope of these orders includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level \3\ of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper, the better the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. ``Colored paper'' as used in this scope definition means a paper with a hue other than white that reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a combination of such primary colors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a) uncoated free sheet paper that meets this scope definition; (b) uncoated ground wood paper produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other uncoated paper that meets this scope definition regardless of the type of pulp used to produce the paper. Specifically excluded from the scope are (1) paper printed with final content of printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper products, typically school supplies, composed of paper that incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines that would make the paper unsuitable for copying or printing purposes. For purposes of this scope definition, paper shall be considered ``printed with final content'' where at least one side of the sheet has printed text and/or graphics that cover at least five percent of the surface area of the entire sheet. Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Amendment to Final Determinations A ministerial error is defined as an error in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See section 735(e) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brazil Amended Final Determination Pursuant to section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), the Department is amending the Brazil Final to reflect the correction of a ministerial error it made in the final margin assigned to one of the respondents. In addition, because the Department calculated the ``all-others'' rate based on a weighted-average of the respondents' margins using publicly-ranged quantities for their sales of subject merchandise, we have revised the all-others rate.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See the ``Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 11175]] On January 19, 2016, Petitioners submitted a ministerial error allegation claiming that the Department made a ministerial error with regard to one of the respondent's bank charges, and the SAS programming which implemented the bank charge at issue. The Department reviewed the record and agrees that we made ministerial errors within the meaning of Section 735(e) and 19 CFR 351.224(f). Specifically, the Department made an unintentional error with regard to one of the respondent's bank charges and SAS programming which implemented the bank charge at issue.\6\ We have corrected these errors in this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Paul Walker, Program Manager, Office V, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: Analysis of Ministerial Error Allegation,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Indonesia Amended Final Determination Pursuant to section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), the Department is amending the Indonesia Final to reflect the correction of ministerial errors it made in the final margin assigned to the sole cooperative respondent. In addition, because the Department applied the respondent's final margin to the ``all-others'' rate and further, relied on the highest transaction-specific dumping margin as adverse facts available, we have revised the other final rates.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See the ``Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 19, 2016, PT Anugerah Kertas Utama/PT Riau Andalan Kertas/APRIL Fine Paper Macao Commercial Offshore Limited (collectively, APRIL) submitted timely filed allegations that the Department made ministerial errors in our final determination. On January 21, 2016, Petitioners submitted rebuttal comments on APRIL's allegations. APRIL alleged the Department made two ministerial errors in its final determination: The exclusion of APRIL's home market billing adjustments and an inconsistency in the Department's calculation of APRIL's difference in merchandise adjustment (DIFMER). The Department reviewed the record and agrees that we made ministerial errors within the meaning of section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). Specifically, the Department made unintentional errors with regard to the exclusion of APRIL's home market billing adjustments and with regard to the calculation of APRIL's DIFMER.\8\ We have corrected these errors in this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Melissa G. Skinner, Director, Office II, ``Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Allegations of Ministerial Errors in the Final Determination,'' dated February 17, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Antidumping Duty Orders As stated above, on February 22, 2016, in accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, the ITC notified the Department of its final determinations in these investigations, in which it found material injury with respect to certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal and its determination that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to imports of subject merchandise from Australia that are subject to the Department's affirmative critical circumstances finding.\9\ Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(2) of the Act, we are issuing these antidumping duty orders. Because the ITC determined that imports of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal are materially injuring a U.S. industry, unliquidated entries of such merchandise from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal, entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, are subject to the assessment of antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See ITC Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess, upon further instruction by the Department, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the merchandise, for all relevant entries of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal. Antidumping duties will be assessed on unliquidated entries of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after August 26, 2015, and in the case of Brazil, on August 27, 2015, the date of publication of the preliminary determinations,\10\ but will not include entries occurring after the expiration of the provisional measures period and before publication of the ITC's final injury determination as further described below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Negative Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 51783 (August 26, 2015) (Australia Prelim); Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 52029 (August 27, 2015) (Brazil Prelim); Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 51771 (August 26, 2015) (Indonesia Prelim); Certain Uncoated Paper From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 51768 (August 26, 2015) (PRC Prelim); and Certain Uncoated Paper From Portugal: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 51777 (August 26, 2015) (Portugal Prelim). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation on all relevant entries of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal. These instructions suspending liquidation will remain in effect until further notice. We will also instruct CBP to require cash deposits equal to the amounts as indicated below. Accordingly, effective on the date of publication of the ITC's final affirmative injury determinations, CBP will require, at the same time as importers would normally deposit estimated duties on this subject merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margins listed below.\11\ The relevant all-others and PRC-wide rates apply to all producers or exporters not specifically listed, as appropriate. For the purpose of determining cash deposit rates, the estimated weighted-average dumping margins for imports of subject merchandise from Indonesia and the PRC will be adjusted, as appropriate, for export subsidies found in the final determinations of the companion countervailing duty investigations of this merchandise imported from Indonesia and the PRC.12 13 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See section 736(a)(3) of the Act. \12\ See Indonesia Final, 81 FR 3103; see also, PRC Final, 81 FR, at 3114. \13\ We are not adjusting the PRC rates for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through because there is no cost-to-price linkage to a subsidized program and, thus, we have no basis upon which to make such an adjustment in that case. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Provisional Measures Section 733(d) of the Act states that instructions issued pursuant to an affirmative preliminary determination may not remain in effect for more than four months, except where exporters representing a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise request the Department to extend that four-month period to no more than six months. At the request of exporters that account for a significant proportion of [[Page 11176]] certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal, we extended the four-month period to six months in each case.\14\ In the underlying investigations, the Department published the preliminary determinations on August 26, 2015, and August 27, 2015. Therefore, the extended period, beginning on the date of publication of the preliminary determinations, ended on February 21, 2016, and in the case of Brazil, on February 22, 2016. Furthermore, section 737(b) of the Act states that definitive duties are to begin on the date of publication of the ITC's final injury determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Australia Prelim, Brazil Prelim, Indonesia Prelim, PRC Prelim, and Portugal Prelim. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Therefore, in accordance with section 733(d) of the Act and our practice, we will instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties, unliquidated entries of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after February 21, 2016, and in the case of Brazil, on February 22, 2016, the dates on which the provisional measures expired, until and through the day preceding the date of publication of the ITC's final injury determinations in the Federal Register. Suspension of liquidation will resume on the date of publication of the ITC's final determination in the Federal Register. Critical Circumstances With regard to the ITC's negative critical circumstances determination on imports of subject merchandise from Australia, we will instruct CBP to lift suspension and to refund any cash deposits made to secure the payment of estimated antidumping duties with respect to entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after May 28, 2015 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of publication of the Australia Prelim), but before August 26, 2015, (i.e., the date of publication of the Australia Prelim). Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping Margins The weighted-average antidumping duty margin percentages are as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ The Department determined that International Paper do Brasil Ltda. and International Paper Exportadora Ltda. constituted a single entity. See Brazil Final, 81 FR, at 3116. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/manufacturer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Australia: Paper Australia Pty. Ltd............................ 222.46 All Others.......................................... 138.87 Brazil: International Paper do Brasil Ltda. and 41.39 International Paper Exportadora Ltda.\15\.......... Suzano Papel e Celulose S.A......................... 22.37 All Others.......................................... 27.11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weighted- Exporter/ average Cash manufacturer dumping margin deposit (percent) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Indonesia: Great Champ Trading Limited.......................................... 17.46 0.00 Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK/Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia/PT. Pindo Deli 17.46 0.00 Pulp and Paper Mills (APP/SMG)...................................... April Fine Paper Macao Commercial OffShore Limited/PT Anugerah Kertas 2.10 2.10 Utama/PT Riau Andalan Kertas (APRIL)................................ All Others........................................................... 2.10 2.10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The cash deposit rates are adjusted to account for the applicable export subsidy rate of 51.75 percent for Great Champ Trading Limited and APP/SMG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weighted- average Exporter Producer dumping margin Cash deposit (percent) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC: Greenpoint Global Trading (Macao Asia Symbol (Guangdong) Paper 84.05 83.92 Commercial Offshore) Ltd.. Co., Ltd.; and Asia Symbol (Shangong) Pulp & Paper Co., Ltd. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity............................................................. 149.00 148.87 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The cash deposit rates are adjusted to account for the applicable export subsidy rate of 0.13 percent for Asia Symbol and the PRC-Wide Entity. [[Page 11177]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/manufacturer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Portugal: Portucel S.A.\16\................................... 7.80 All-Others.......................................... 7.80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This notice constitutes the antidumping duty orders with respect to certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. Interested parties can find a list of antidumping duty orders currently in effect at http://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ In Portugal Final, we determined to treat several companies as a single entity with Portucel S.A. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- These orders are published in accordance with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b). Dated: February 25, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-04699 Filed 3-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![11174 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Notices
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, ITC notified the Department of its definition; and (c) any other uncoated
including Section 400.14. affirmative determinations that an paper that meets this scope definition
Dated: February 26, 2016. industry in the United States is regardless of the type of pulp used to
Andrew McGilvray,
materially injured within the meaning produce the paper.
of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, by Specifically excluded from the scope
Executive Secretary.
reason of the LTFV imports of certain are (1) paper printed with final content
[FR Doc. 2016–04715 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am]
uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, of printed text or graphics and (2) lined
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal and its paper products, typically school
determination that critical supplies, composed of paper that
circumstances do not exist with respect incorporates straight horizontal and/or
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
to imports of subject merchandise from vertical lines that would make the paper
International Trade Administration Australia that are subject to the unsuitable for copying or printing
Department’s affirmative critical purposes. For purposes of this scope
[A–602–807, A–351–842, A–560–828, A–570– circumstances finding.2 definition, paper shall be considered
022, A–471–807]
Scope of the Orders ‘‘printed with final content’’ where at
Certain Uncoated Paper From least one side of the sheet has printed
The scope of these orders includes text and/or graphics that cover at least
Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing
People’s Republic of China, and five percent of the surface area of the
at least 40 grams per square meter but entire sheet.
Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative not more than 150 grams per square
Antidumping Determinations for Brazil Imports of the subject merchandise
meter; that either is a white paper with are provided for under Harmonized
and Indonesia and Antidumping Duty a GE brightness level 3 of 85 or higher
Orders Tariff Schedule of the United States
or is a colored paper; whether or not (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, surface-decorated, printed (except as 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000,
International Trade Administration, described below), embossed, perforated, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,
Department of Commerce. or punched; irrespective of the 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040,
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final smoothness of the surface; and 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000,
determinations by the Department of irrespective of dimensions (Certain 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some
Commerce (the Department) and the Uncoated Paper). imports of subject merchandise may
International Trade Commission (the Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a) also be classified under 4802.62.1000,
ITC), the Department is issuing uncoated free sheet paper that meets 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,
antidumping duty orders on certain this scope definition; (b) uncoated 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020,
uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, ground wood paper produced from 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000,
Indonesia, the People’s Republic of bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000,
China (PRC), and Portugal. Also, as pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While
explained in this notice, the Department HTSUS subheadings are provided for
Value and Affirmative Final Determination of
is amending its final affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part, 81 FR 3108 (January convenience and customs purposes, the
determinations with respect to Brazil 20, 2016) (Australia Final); Certain Uncoated Paper written description of the scope of the
and Indonesia. From Brazil: Final Determination of Sales at Less orders is dispositive.
DATES: Effective Date: March 3, 2016. Than Fair Value, 81 FR 3115 (January 20, 2016)
(Brazil Final); Certain Uncoated Paper From Amendment to Final Determinations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Indonesia: Final Determination of Sales at Less
Wang at (202) 482–6231 (Australia), Than Fair Value; 81 FR 3101 (January 20, 2016) A ministerial error is defined as an
Julia Hancock at (202) 482–1394 (Indonesia Final); Certain Uncoated Paper From the error in addition, subtraction, or other
People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of
(Brazil), Blaine Wiltse at (202) 482–6345 Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 3112 (January
arithmetic function, clerical error
(Indonesia), Stephanie Moore at (202) 20, 2016) (PRC Final); and Certain Uncoated Paper resulting from inaccurate copying,
482–3692 (PRC), or Kabir Archuletta at From Portugal: Final Determination of Sales at Less duplication, or the like, and any other
(202) 482–2593 (Portugal), AD/CVD Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination similar type of unintentional error
of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR 3105 (January 20,
Operations, Enforcement and 2016) (Portugal Final).
which the Secretary considers
Compliance, International Trade 2 See Letter to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant ministerial.4
Administration, U.S. Department of Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and
Brazil Amended Final Determination
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Compliance, from Meredith Broadbent, Chairman of
the U.S. International Trade Commission, regarding Pursuant to section 735(e) of the Act
NW., Washington, DC 20230. certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: China, Indonesia, and Portugal (February 22, 2016) and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), the
(ITC Letter). See also Certain Uncoated Paper from Department is amending the Brazil Final
Background Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal, to reflect the correction of a ministerial
USITC Investigation Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and error it made in the final margin
In accordance with sections 735(d) 731–TA–1264–1268 (Final), USITC Publication
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 4592 (February 2016). assigned to one of the respondents. In
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 3 One of the key measurements of any grade of addition, because the Department
351.210(c), on January 20, 2016, the paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter calculated the ‘‘all-others’’ rate based on
Department published its affirmative the paper, the better the contrast between the paper a weighted-average of the respondents’
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
final determinations in the less-than- Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
margins using publicly-ranged
fair-value (LTFV) investigations of light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest quantities for their sales of subject
certain uncoated paper from Australia, reflection, or what would be given to a totally black merchandise, we have revised the all-
Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. others rate.5
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition
Portugal.1 On February 22, 2016, the means a paper with a hue other than white that
4 Seesection 735(e) of the Act.
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,
1 SeeCertain Uncoated Paper From Australia: yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a 5 Seethe ‘‘Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair combination of such primary colors. Margins’’ section below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Mar 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM 03MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11216/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2016 / Notices 11177
Weighted-
average
Exporter/manufacturer dumping
margin
(percent)
Portugal:
Portucel S.A.16 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7.80
All-Others ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 7.80
This notice constitutes the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-
antidumping duty orders with respect to Yang Jin Chun AD/CVD Operations, interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser
certain uncoated paper from Australia, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, Diamond Tools Co.
Brazil, Indonesia, the PRC, and Portugal International Trade Administration, As explained in the memorandum
pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
Interested parties can find a list of Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Enforcement and Compliance, the
antidumping duty orders currently in DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5760. Department has exercised its discretion
effect at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to toll all administrative deadlines due
stats/iastats1.html. to the recent closure of the Federal
These orders are published in Background Government. All deadlines in this
accordance with section 736(a) of the The Department published the segment of the proceeding have been
Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b). antidumping duty order on diamond extended by four business days. The
sawblades and parts thereof from the revised deadline for the initiation of this
Dated: February 25, 2016.
People’s Republic of China on review is now February 25, 2016.5
Paul Piquado,
November 4, 2009.1 In its December 22,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 2015, request for a changed Scope of the Order
Compliance.
circumstances review, Wuhan Wanbang The products covered by the order are
[FR Doc. 2016–04699 Filed 3–2–16; 8:45 am] Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., all finished circular sawblades, whether
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P informed the Department that, effective slotted or not, with a working part that
May 4, 2015, Wuhan Wanbang Laser is comprised of a diamond segment or
Diamond Tools Co. (1) changed its legal segments, and parts thereof, regardless
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE status from a limited liability company of specification or size, except as
to a joint-stock limited company and (2) specifically excluded below. Within the
International Trade Administration
changed its name to Wuhan Wanbang scope of the order are semifinished
[A–570–900] Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.2 Wuhan diamond sawblades, including diamond
Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. is a sawblade cores and diamond sawblade
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof respondent in the ongoing segments. Diamond sawblade cores are
From the People’s Republic of China: administrative review of the circular steel plates, whether or not
Initiation and Preliminary Results of antidumping duty order on diamond attached to non-steel plates, with slots.
Changed Circumstances Review sawblades from the PRC covering the Diamond sawblade cores are
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, period November 1, 2013, through manufactured principally, but not
International Trade Administration, October 31, 2014.3 Both Wuhan exclusively, from alloy steel. A diamond
Department of Commerce. Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. and sawblade segment consists of a mixture
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools of diamonds (whether natural or
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 751(b) of
Co., Ltd., are respondents in the ongoing synthetic, and regardless of the quantity
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the administrative review of the same order
Act), and 19 CFR 351.216 and 19 CFR of diamonds) and metal powders
covering the period November 1, 2014, (including, but not limited to, iron,
351.221(c)(3), the Department of through October 31, 2015.4 Pursuant to
Commerce (the Department) is initiating cobalt, nickel, tungsten carbide) that are
section 751(b) of the Act, and 19 CFR formed together into a solid shape (from
a changed circumstances review of the 351.216(c) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3),
antidumping duty order on diamond generally, but not limited to, a heating
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools and pressing process).
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond Co., Ltd., requested that the Department
sawblades) from the People’s Republic Sawblades with diamonds directly
initiate an expedited changed attached to the core with a resin or
of China (the PRC) with respect to circumstances review and determine
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools electroplated bond, which thereby do
that Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond not contain a diamond segment, are not
Co., Ltd. Based on the information on
the record, we preliminarily determine included within the scope of the order.
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
that Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond From the People’s Republic of China and the
Diamond sawblades and/or sawblade
Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in- Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR cores with a thickness of less than 0.025
interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser 57145 (November 4, 2009). inches, or with a thickness greater than
Diamond Tools Co. for purposes of
2 See Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co.,
1.1 inches, are excluded from the scope
Ltd.’s request for a changed circumstances review of the order. Circular steel plates that
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
determining antidumping duty liability. dated December 22, 2015 (review request).
We invite interested parties to comment 3 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
have a cutting edge of non-diamond
on these preliminary results. From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary material, such as external teeth that
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
DATES: Effective March 3, 2016. Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 75854, 75855 (December 5 See Memorandum for the Record from Acting
4, 2015). Assistant Secretary Ron Lorentzen entitled ‘‘Tolling
16 In Portugal Final, we determined to treat 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the
several companies as a single entity with Portucel Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas’ ’’
S.A. 736, 738 (January 7, 2016). dated January 27, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:17 Mar 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM 03MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_11216/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-03-03 03:50:59
Document Modified: 2016-03-03 03:50:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Eve Wang at (202) 482-6231 (Australia), Julia Hancock at (202) 482-1394 (Brazil), Blaine Wiltse at (202) 482-6345 (Indonesia), Stephanie Moore at (202) 482-3692 (PRC), or Kabir Archuletta at (202) 482-2593 (Portugal), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 11174 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR