81 FR 12588 - Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River 321.4 to 321.6; Quincy, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 47 (March 10, 2016)

Page Range		12588-12590
FR Document		2016-05388

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all waters of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) from mile 321.4 to mile 321.6. The safety zone is needed to protect persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with work being completed on new power lines across the river. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP). Deviation from the safety zone may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-case basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12588-12590]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0155]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River 321.4 to 321.6; Quincy, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
all waters of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) from mile 321.4 to mile 
321.6. The safety zone is needed to protect persons, property, and 
infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with 
work being completed on new power lines across the river. Entry of 
vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP). Deviation from the safety 
zone may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-case basis as 
specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. daily 
beginning on March 21, 2016 through April 1, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0155 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

BNM Broadcast Notice to Mariners
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
UMR Upper Mississippi River
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency finds good cause that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because Ameren notified the Coast Guard on 
February 17, 2016, that this work will require helicopters to stretch 
the power lines across the river. Due to the risks associated with this 
work crossing the navigable channel, a closure is needed. It would be 
impracticable to publish a NPRM because the safety zone must be 
established beginning March 21, 2016. Broadcast Notices to Mariners 
(BNM) and information sharing with waterway users will update mariners 
of the safety zone and enforcement times during the operations.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Providing 30 days 
notice would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to 
protect vessels from the hazards associated with the rope crossing the 
navigable channel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The COTP UMR has determined that potential hazards associated 
with using helicopters to stretch power lines across the navigational 
channel presents safety concerns for anyone within this limited area of 
the UMR. This rule provides additional safety measures, to protect 
persons and vessels, in the form of a safety zone from mile 321.4 to 
mile 321.6 on the UMR to protect those in the area and for the Coast 
Guard to maintain navigational safety.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone prohibiting 
access to the UMR from mile 321.4 to mile 321.6, extending the entire 
width of the river from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. daily beginning on 
March 21, 2016 and scheduled to end on April 1, 2016, or until 
conditions allow for safe navigation, whichever occurs earlier. 
Deviation from the safety zone may be requested and will be considered 
on a case-by-case basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a 
designated representative. The COTP may be contacted by telephone at 
314-269-2332 or can be reached by VHF-FM channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget. This rule establishes a temporary safety zone limiting access 
to the UMR from mile 321.4 to mile 321.6. Notifications of enforcement 
times will be communicated to the marine community via BNM. The impacts 
on navigation will be limited to ensure the safety of mariners and 
vessels during the period that the helicopters will be pulling the 
power lines across the navigational channel. Deviation requests

[[Page 12589]]

will be reviewed and considered on a case-by-case basis.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone on the UMR from mile 321.4 to mile 321.6. 
It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) 
of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0155 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0155  Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River 321.4 to 
321.6; Quincy, IL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of 
the Upper Mississippi River mile 321.4 to 321.6, extending the entire 
width of the river.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, 
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River (COTP) in the enforcement 
of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through Coast Guard Sector 
Upper Mississippi River at 314-269-2332. Those in the safety zone must 
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP 
or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Effective and enforcement period. This rule is effective and 
will be enforced from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. daily beginning on 
March 21, 2016 through April 1, 2016.


[[Page 12590]]


    Dated: March 3, 2016.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016-05388 Filed 3-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 12589

will be reviewed and considered on a between the national government and G. Protest Activities
case-by-case basis. the States, or on the distribution of The Coast Guard respects the First
power and responsibilities among the Amendment rights of protesters.
B. Impact on Small Entities
various levels of government. We have Protesters are asked to contact the
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent INFORMATION CONTACT section to
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism coordinate protest activities so that your
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements message can be received without
small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132. jeopardizing the safety or security of
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal people, places or vessels.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian requirements, Security measures,
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the Waterways.
605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes, For the reasons discussed in the
significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal CFR part 165 as follows:
While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
reasons stated in section V.A. above, contact the person listed in the FOR
this rule will not have a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
economic impact on any vessel owner continues to read as follows:
above.
or operator. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Business Regulatory Enforcement Department of Homeland Security Delegation
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), No. 0170.1.
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
we want to assist small entities in ■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0155 to read as
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
understanding this rule. If the rule follows:
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
would affect your small business,
particular, the Act addresses actions § 165.T08–0155 Safety Zone; Upper
organization, or governmental
that may result in the expenditure by a Mississippi River 321.4 to 321.6; Quincy, IL.
jurisdiction and you have questions
State, local, or tribal government, in the (a) Location. The following area is a
concerning its provisions or options for
aggregate, or by the private sector of safety zone: All waters of the Upper
compliance, please contact the person
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Mississippi River mile 321.4 to 321.6,
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
more in any one year. Though this rule extending the entire width of the river.
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments will not result in such an expenditure, (b) Definitions. As used in this
on the actions of Federal employees we do discuss the effects of this rule section, designated representative
who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble. means a Coast Guard Patrol
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment Commander, including a Coast Guard
the Small Business and Agriculture coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman We have analyzed this rule under operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
and the Regional Small Business Department of Homeland Security Federal, State, and local officer
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Management Directive 023–01 and designated by or assisting the Captain of
Ombudsman evaluates these actions Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, the Port Upper Mississippi River
annually and rates each agency’s which guide the Coast Guard in (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
responsiveness to small business. If you complying with the National zone.
wish to comment on actions by Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
employees of the Coast Guard, call U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have safety zone regulations in subpart C of
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). determined that this action is one of a this part, you may not enter the safety
The Coast Guard will not retaliate category of actions that do not zone described in paragraph (a) of this
against small entities that question or individually or cumulatively have a section unless authorized by the COTP
complain about this rule or any policy significant effect on the human or the COTP’s designated representative.
or action of the Coast Guard. environment. This rule involves a safety (2) To seek permission to enter,
zone on the UMR from mile 321.4 to contact the COTP or the COTP’s
C. Collection of Information mile 321.6. It is categorically excluded representative via VHF–FM channel 16,
This rule will not call for a new from further review under paragraph or through Coast Guard Sector Upper
collection of information under the 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Mississippi River at 314–269–2332.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Instruction. An environmental analysis Those in the safety zone must comply
U.S.C. 3501–3520). checklist supporting this determination with all lawful orders or directions
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

and a Categorical Exclusion given to them by the COTP or the
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Determination are available in the COTP’s designated representative.
Governments docket where indicated under (d) Effective and enforcement period.
A rule has implications for federalism ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or This rule is effective and will be
under Executive Order 13132, information that may lead to the enforced from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct discovery of a significant environmental daily beginning on March 21, 2016
effect on the States, on the relationship impact from this rule. through April 1, 2016.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Mar 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM 10MRR1

12590 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

Dated: March 3, 2016. Background included a compliance date of May 7,
M.L. Malloy, 2012.
Under Title VIII of the Alaska On October 23, 2009, Secretary of the
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River. National Interest Lands Conservation Interior Ken Salazar announced the
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126), initiation of a Departmental review of
[FR Doc. 2016–05388 Filed 3–9–16; 8:45 am]
the Secretary of the Interior and the the Federal Subsistence Management
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) Program in Alaska; Secretary of
jointly implement the Federal Agriculture Tom Vilsack later concurred
Subsistence Management Program with this course of action. The
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (Program). This program provides a Secretaries announced the findings of
preference for take of fish and wildlife the review, which included several
Forest Service resources for subsistence uses on proposed administrative and regulatory
Federal public lands and waters in reviews and/or revisions to strengthen
36 CFR Part 242 Alaska. Only residents of areas the Program and make it more
identified as rural are eligible to responsive to those who rely on it for
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR participate in the Program on Federal their subsistence uses. One proposal
public lands in Alaska. Because this called for a review, with Council input,
Fish and Wildlife Service program is a joint effort between Interior of the rural determination process and,
and Agriculture, these regulations are if needed, recommendations for
50 CFR Part 100 located in two titles of the Code of regulatory changes.
[Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2015–0156; Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 36, The Board met on January 20, 2012,
FXRS12610700000–156–FF07J00000; FBMS ‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public Property,’’ and, among other things, decided to
#4500087231] and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and Fisheries,’’ extend the compliance date of its 2007
RIN 1018–BA82
at 36 CFR 242.1–242.28 and 50 CFR final rule on rural determinations. A
100.1–100.28, respectively. final rule published March 1, 2012 (77
Subsistence Management Regulations Consistent with these regulations, the FR 12477), that extended the
for Public Lands in Alaska; Rural Secretaries established a Federal compliance date until either the rural
Determinations, Nonrural List Subsistence Board (Board) comprising determination process and findings
Federal officials and public members to review were completed or 5 years,
AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture; administer the Program. One of the whichever came first. The 2007
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. Board’s responsibilities is to determine regulations have remained in titles 36
ACTION: Affirmation of direct final rule. which communities or areas of the State and 50 of the CFR unchanged since their
are nonrural. The Secretaries also effective date.
SUMMARY: The Federal Subsistence The Board followed that action with
divided Alaska into 10 subsistence
Board is adopting, without change, a a request for comments and
resource regions, each of which is
direct final rule that revised the list of announcement of public meetings (77
represented by a Regional Advisory
areas in Alaska determined to be FR 77005; December 31, 2012) to receive
Council (Council). The Council
nonrural for purposes of the Federal public, Tribal, and Alaska Native
members represent varied geographical,
Subsistence Program to the list that Corporation input on the rural
cultural, and user interests within each
existed prior to 2007. Accordingly, the determination process. At their fall 2013
region. The Councils provide a forum
community of Saxman and the area of meetings, the Councils provided a
for rural residents with personal
Prudhoe Bay were removed from the public forum to hear from residents of
knowledge of local conditions and
nonrural list. The following areas their regions, deliberate on the rural
resource requirements to have a
continue to be nonrural, but their determination process, and provide
meaningful role in the subsistence
boundaries returned to their previous recommendations for changes to the
management of fish and wildlife on
borders: The Kenai Area; the Wasilla/ Board. The Board also held hearings in
Federal public lands in Alaska.
Palmer area; the Homer area; and the Barrow, Ketchikan, Sitka, Kodiak,
Ketchikan area. Because we received no Related Rulemaking Bethel, Anchorage, Fairbanks, Kotzebue,
substantive adverse comments on the Nome, and Dillingham to solicit
direct final rule, it is now effective. The Secretaries published a final rule comments on the rural determination
(80 FR 68249; November 4, 2015) that process, and public testimony was
DATES: The direct final rule published at
sets forth a new process by which the recorded. Government-to-government
80 FR 68245 on November 4, 2015, was Board will make rural determinations
effective December 21, 2015. tribal consultations on the rural
(‘‘Subsistence Management Regulations determination process were held
ADDRESSES: The direct final rule may be for Public Lands in Alaska; Rural between members of the Board and
found online at www.regulations.gov in Determination Process’’). Federally recognized Tribes of Alaska.
Docket No. FWS–R7–SM–2015–0156. Until promulgation of the rule Additional consultations were held
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mentioned above, Federal subsistence between members of the Board and
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o regulations at 36 CFR 242.15 and 50 Alaska Native Corporations.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, CFR 100.15 had required that the rural Altogether, the Board received 475
Attention: Eugene R. Peltola, Jr., Office or nonrural status of communities or substantive comments from various
of Subsistence Management; (907) 786– areas be reviewed every 10 years, sources, including individuals,
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For beginning with the availability of the members of the Councils, and other
questions specific to National Forest 2000 census data. In addition, criteria entities or organizations, such as Alaska
System lands, contact Thomas Whitford, for aggregation of communities and Native Corporations and borough
Regional Subsistence Program Leader, population thresholds were listed. On governments. In general, this
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region; May 7, 2007, the Board published a final information indicated a broad
(907) 743–9461 or twhitford@fs.fed.us. rule that revised the list of nonrural dissatisfaction with the current rural
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: areas (72 FR 25688), and the rule determination process.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:38 Mar 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM 10MRR1

Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:12:12
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:12:12

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. daily beginning on March 21, 2016 through April 1, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 12588
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 12588 - Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River 321.4 to 321.6; Quincy, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 47 (March 10, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard