81 FR 12688 - Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 47 (March 10, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 47 (March 10, 2016)
| Page Range | 12688-12690 | |
| FR Document | 2016-05404 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 12688-12690] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-05404] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-928] Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), for the period of review (``POR''), February 1, 2014, to January 31, 2015. The Department preliminarily determines that Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer (``Macao Commercial'') had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We also preliminarily determine that East Grace Corporation (``East Grace'') has not established its entitlement to separate rate status and, therefore, is being treated as part of the PRC-wide entity. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6491. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 19, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register an antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units from the PRC.\1\ On June 30, 2014, the Department received a request from Petitioner \2\ to conduct an administrative review of East Grace and Macao Commercial.\3\ On April 3, 2015, the Department initiated this review based on Petitioner's review request.\4\ On May 11, 2015, the Department issued its standard antidumping duty questionnaires to East Grace and Macao Commercial.\5\ Macao Commercial provided timely responses to the Department's initial and supplemental questionnaires. East Grace did not respond to the Department's standard questionnaire and has not participated in this proceeding. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009) (``Order''). \2\ The Petitioner is Leggett & Platt Inc. (hereinafter ``Petitioner''). \3\ See Request for Antidumping Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China, dated February 27, 2015. \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 18202 (April 3, 2015) (``Initiation Notice''). We note that the Initiation Notice appeared to identify ``Macao Commercial'' and ``Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer'' as two separate companies. However, the name of the single company for which a review was requested was actually ``Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer,'' and we clarify now that this is the correct name of the company under review. \5\ See Letter to East Grace Corporation, dated May 11, 2015, and Letter to Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer, dated May 11, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together in sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full, full long, queen, California king and king) and units used in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 9404.29.9010 and have also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000, 9404.29.9005, 9404.29.9011, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or 7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ For a full description of the scope of the Order, see Decision Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ``Preliminary Results of 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China'' (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), issued concurrently with and adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 12689]] Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided at Appendix I to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments In its certified response to the Department's standard antidumping duty questionnaire, Macao Commercial stated that it had no shipments of PRC origin innersprings to the United States during the POR. Between June 6, 2015 and December 24, 2015, the Department issued supplemental questionnaires to Macao Commercial to verify this no shipments claim. Additionally, to corroborate Macao Commercial's no shipments claim, the Department submitted a formal query to U.S. Customs & Border Protection (``CBP''), the results of which did not provide any evidence that contradicts Macao Commercial's claim of no shipments. Thus, the Department preliminarily determines that Macao Commercial had no shipments of innerspring units of PRC origin to the United States during the POR and, therefore, had no reviewable entries.\8\ In addition, consistent with the Department's practice in nonmarket economy cases, the Department finds that it is appropriate not to rescind the review, in part, in these circumstances, but rather to complete the review with respect to Macao Commercial and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ For more detail see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \9\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Companies That Did Not Establish Their Eligibility for a Separate Rate In our Initiation Notice, we stated, ``{f{time} or exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the questionnaire as mandatory respondents.''[hairsp]\10\ East Grace was selected as a mandatory respondent in the instant review, but East Grace failed to respond to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaire, and East Grace did not submit a no-shipments certification. Therefore, we preliminarily find that East Grace is no longer eligible for separate rate status and that the PRC-wide entity includes East Grace.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 18203. \11\ See section 776(b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We also note that the Department's change in policy \12\ regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\13\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the PRC-wide entity is not under review and therefore its rate is not subject to change. The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is 234.51 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \13\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self- initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing \14\ Interested parties may submit case briefs within 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\15\ Rebuttals to case briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\16\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\17\ Parties submitting briefs should do so pursuant to the Department's electronic filing system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with a preliminary results result of review within five days of the date of publication of the notice of preliminary results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because the Department has preliminarily determined that East Grace is ineligible for a separate rate and that Macao Commercial had no shipments during the POR, there are no calculations to disclose. \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\18\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs.\19\ If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \19\ Id. \20\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of any issues raised in case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\21\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate relevant entries from the PRC-wide entity (including East Grace) at the current rate for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 234.51 percent). For Macao Commercial, which we preliminarily find had no shipments during the POR, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries of subject merchandise that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., [[Page 12690]] at that exporter's rate) at the PRC-wide rate.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). \22\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any companies listed that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results are being issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: March 2, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: 1. Summary 2. Case History 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Methodology a. Non-Market Economy Status b. Companies that Did Not Establish Their Eligibility for a Separate Rate c. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-05404 Filed 3-9-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![12688 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Notices
China (the PRC)); AD/CVD Operations, This notice is issued and published a request from Petitioner 2 to conduct an
Enforcement and Compliance, pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act administrative review of East Grace and
International Trade Administration, and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Macao Commercial.3 On April 3, 2015,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Dated: March 2, 2016. the Department initiated this review
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Paul Piquado, based on Petitioner’s review request.4
Washington, DC 20230. On May 11, 2015, the Department
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Compliance. issued its standard antidumping duty
Background [FR Doc. 2016–05448 Filed 3–9–16; 8:45 am]
questionnaires to East Grace and Macao
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Commercial.5 Macao Commercial
On November 25, 2015, the provided timely responses to the
Department of Commerce (Department) Department’s initial and supplemental
initiated antidumping duty questionnaires. East Grace did not
investigations on certain iron DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
respond to the Department’s standard
mechanical transfer drive components International Trade Administration questionnaire and has not participated
from Canada and the PRC.1 Section
in this proceeding.
733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as [A–570–928]
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR Scope of the Order
351.205(b)(1) state the Department will Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
make a preliminary determination no People’s Republic of China: The merchandise subject to the order
later than 140 days after the date of the Preliminary Results of the is uncovered innerspring units
initiation. The current deadline for the Antidumping Duty Administrative composed of a series of individual metal
preliminary determinations of these Review; 2014–2015 springs joined together in sizes
investigations is no later than April 11, corresponding to the sizes of adult
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
2016.2 mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
International Trade Administration,
full long, queen, California king and
Postponement of Preliminary Department of Commerce.
king) and units used in smaller
Determinations SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
constructions, such as crib and youth
On February 19, 2016, TB Woods (the ‘‘Department’’) is conducting an mattresses. Uncovered innersprings are
Incorporated (Petitioner) made a timely administrative review of the classified under subheading
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e), antidumping duty order on uncovered 9404.29.9010 and have also been
for postponement of the preliminary innerspring units from the People’s classified under subheadings
determinations, in order to provide the Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), for the
9404.10.0000, 9404.29.9005,
Department with sufficient time to period of review (‘‘POR’’), February 1,
9404.29.9011, 7326.20.0070,
develop the record in these proceedings 2014, to January 31, 2015. The
7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or
through additional questionnaires, Department preliminarily determines
7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff
which Petitioner will in turn need time that Macao Commercial and Industrial
Schedule of the United States
to analyze and possibly comment on. Spring Mattress Manufacturer (‘‘Macao
(‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS subheadings
Because there are no compelling reasons Commercial’’) had no reviewable
are provided for convenience and
to deny Petitioner’s request, in shipments of subject merchandise
customs purposes only; the written
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of during the POR. We also preliminarily
description of the scope of the order is
the Act, the Department is postponing determine that East Grace Corporation
dispositive.6
the deadline for the preliminary (‘‘East Grace’’) has not established its
determinations by 50 days. entitlement to separate rate status and,
2 The Petitioner is Leggett & Platt Inc. (hereinafter
For the reasons stated above, the therefore, is being treated as part of the ‘‘Petitioner’’).
Department, in accordance with section PRC-wide entity. Interested parties are 3 See Request for Antidumping Administrative
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing invited to comment on these Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
the deadline for the preliminary preliminary results. Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s
determinations to no later than 190 days Republic of China, dated February 27, 2015.
DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2016. 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
after the date on which the Department FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
initiated these investigations. Therefore, Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations, 18202 (April 3, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). We note
the new deadline for the preliminary Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, that the Initiation Notice appeared to identify
determinations is May 31, 2016. In ‘‘Macao Commercial’’ and ‘‘Industrial Spring
International Trade Administration, Mattress Manufacturer’’ as two separate companies.
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Department of Commerce, 14th Street However, the name of the single company for which
Act, the deadline for the final and Constitution Avenue NW., a review was requested was actually ‘‘Macao
determinations of these investigations Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress
will continue to be 75 days after the Manufacturer,’’ and we clarify now that this is the
482–6491. correct name of the company under review.
date of the preliminary determinations,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 See Letter to East Grace Corporation, dated May
unless postponed at a later date. 11, 2015, and Letter to Macao Commercial and
Background Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer, dated May
1 See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive 11, 2015.
Components from Canada and the People’s On February 19, 2009, the Department 6 For a full description of the scope of the Order,
Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair- published in the Federal Register an see Decision Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Investigations, 80 FR 73716 (November 25, 2015). antidumping duty order on uncovered Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
2 The current deadline of April 11, 2016, accounts Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
innerspring units from the PRC.1 On
for the four-day tolling of deadlines pursuant to Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
inclement weather in January 2016. See January 27, June 30, 2014, the Department received Compliance, entitled ‘‘Preliminary Results of 2014–
2016, Memorandum to the Record from Ron 2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Tolling of Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Republic of China, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009) Memorandum’’), issued concurrently with and
Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas’.’’ (‘‘Order’’). adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Mar 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_12735/page/1.svg)
![12690 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2016 / Notices
at that exporter’s rate) at the PRC-wide 4. Discussion of the Methodology Scope of the Order
rate.22 a. Non-Market Economy Status
b. Companies that Did Not Establish Their Imports covered by the order are
Cash Deposit Requirements Eligibility for a Separate Rate shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta.
c. Preliminary Determination of No The merchandise subject to review is
The following cash deposit
Shipments currently classifiable under items
requirements will be effective upon
5. Recommendation 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
publication of the final results of this
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
review for shipments of the subject [FR Doc. 2016–05404 Filed 3–9–16; 8:45 am]
United States (HTSUS). Although the
merchandise from the PRC entered, or BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
withdrawn from warehouse, for
convenience and customs purposes, the
consumption on or after the publication
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE written description of the merchandise
date, as provided by sections
subject to the order is dispositive.4
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any
companies listed that have a separate International Trade Administration Ministerial Errors
rate, the cash deposit rate will be that Section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of
established in the final results of this [A–475–818] 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19
review (except, if the rate is zero or de CFR 351.224(f) defines a ministerial
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be Certain Pasta From Italy: Amended
error as an error ‘‘in addition,
required); (2) for previously investigated Final Results of Antidumping Duty
subtraction, or other arithmetic
or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters Administrative Review; 2013–2014
function, clerical errors resulting from
not listed that received a separate rate inaccurate copying, duplication, or the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
in a prior segment of this proceeding, like, and any other type of unintentional
International Trade Administration,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be error which {the Department} considers
Department of Commerce.
the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for ministerial.’’ We analyzed La Molisana’s
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
all PRC exporters of subject ministerial error comments and
(the Department) is amending the Final
merchandise that have not been found determined, in accordance with section
Results 1 of the antidumping duty
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e),
administrative review of certain pasta
deposit rate will be that for the PRC- that there was a ministerial error in our
(pasta) from Italy to correct a ministerial
wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC margin calculation for La Molisana for
error. The period of review (POR) is July
exporters of subject merchandise which the Final Results. For a complete
1, 2013, through June 30, 2014.
have not received their own rate, the discussion of the alleged error, see the
cash deposit rate will be the rate DATES: Effective March 10, 2016.
Department’s Ministerial Error
applicable to the PRC exporter that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Memorandum.5
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These Zhang, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, In accordance with section 751(h) of
deposit requirements, when imposed, Enforcement and Compliance, the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are
shall remain in effect until further International Trade Administration, amending the Final Results.
notice. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Specifically, we are amending the
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., weighted-average dumping margin for
Notification to Importers
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) La Molisana as well as for the
This notice also serves as a 482–1168. companies that were not selected for
preliminary reminder to importers of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: individual examination, who were
their responsibility under 19 CFR assigned the rate determined for La
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Background
Molisana.6 The revised weighted-
regarding the reimbursement of On February 10, 2016, the Department average dumping margins for the
antidumping duties prior to liquidation disclosed to interested parties its affected companies are detailed below.
of the relevant entries during the POR. calculations for the Final Results.2 On
Failure to comply with this requirement Amended Final Results
February 17, 2016, the Department
could result in the Department’s received a timely filed ministerial error As a result of correcting for the
presumption that reimbursement of allegation from La Molisana, S.p.A. (La ministerial error, we determined the
antidumping duties occurred and the Molisana) regarding the Department’s following amended weighted-average
subsequent assessment of double final margin calculation.3 dumping margins 7 for the period July 1,
antidumping duties. 2013, through June 30, 2014:
These preliminary results are being Period of Review
issued and published in accordance The POR covered by this review is 4 For a full description of the scope of the order,
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Pasta from
Dated: March 2, 2016. 1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Italy; 2013–2014’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Paul Piquado, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
2014, 81 FR 8043 (February 17, 2016) (Final Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Results).
Compliance. 2 See Memorandum to Eric Greynolds, Program Compliance, dated February 9, 2016 (Issues and
Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office III from Joy Decision Memorandum) and incorporated herein by
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I reference.
Zhang, Case Analyst, ‘‘2013–2014 Antidumping
5 See ‘‘Amended Final Results of the 2013–2014
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Duty Administrative Review of Certain Pasta from
Decision Memorandum: Italy—Final Results, Sales Analysis Memorandum Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
for La Molisana,’’ dated February 10, 2016 (Final Order on Certain Pasta from Italy: Allegation of
1. Summary Ministerial Error,’’ dated concurrently with this
Results Calculations).
2. Case History 3 See Letter from La Molisana, ‘‘Certain Pasta notice (‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum’’).
3. Scope of the Order From Italy: A–475–818; Request for Correction of 6 See Final Results, 80 FR at 61362.
Clerical Error Pursuant to 17 CFR Section 7 The margin for the non-examined companies
22 Id. 351.224(f),’’ dated February 16, 2016. was based on the calculated weighted-average
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:07 Mar 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_12735/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:11:38
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:11:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: March 10, 2016. | |
| Contact | Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6491. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 12688 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR