81_FR_13379 81 FR 13330 - Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; Calendar Year 2014

81 FR 13330 - Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; Calendar Year 2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 49 (March 14, 2016)

Page Range13330-13331
FR Document2016-05569

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review and new shipper review (NSR) of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) for the CVD review and the NSR is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. The Department preliminary determines that Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), the firm examined in the administrative review, and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel), the firm examined in the NSR, each received a de minimis net subsidy rate during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13330-13331]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-837]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From the 
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; Calendar Year 2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review and new shipper review (NSR) of the 
countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality 
steel plate from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review 
(POR) for the CVD review and the NSR is January 1, 2014, through 
December 31, 2014. The Department preliminary determines that Dongkuk 
Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), the firm examined in the administrative 
review, and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel), the firm examined in 
the NSR, each received a de minimis net subsidy rate during the POR. 
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Effective March 14, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff (for Hyundai Steel) or 
Jolanta Lawska (for DSM), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone (202) 482-1009 and (202) 482-8362, respectively.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order \1\ is certain hot-rolled 
carbon-quality steel: (1) Universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled 
products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width 
exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a nominal or actual 
thickness of not less than 4 mm, which are cut-to-length (not in coils) 
and without patterns in relief), of iron or non-alloy-quality steel; 
and (2) flat-rolled products, hot-rolled, of a nominal or actual 
thickness of 4.75 mm or more and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 
measures at least twice the thickness, and which are cut-to-length (not 
in coils).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from 
India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea: Continuation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 264 (January 4, 
2012) (the Order); see also Notice of Amended Final Determination: 
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India and the 
Republic of Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain 
Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From France, India, 
Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 
10, 2000).
    \2\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review, 
and the Preliminary Intent to Rescind in Part: Certain Cut-to-Length 
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea,'' from Chris 
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum) for a complete description of the 
scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the Order is currently classifiable in 
the HTSUS under subheadings: 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050, 
7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 
7226.91.8000, 7226.99.0000. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope 
of this Order is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\4\ For a 
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with 
these results and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic 
version of the Preliminary

[[Page 13331]]

Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and, section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Review \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has 
exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to 
the recent closure of the Federal Government. See Memorandum to the 
Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, 
regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the 
Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. 
All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended 
by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary 
determination of this administrative review and NSR is now March 4, 
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an 
individual subsidy rate for DSM, the firm subject to the administrative 
review. For the period January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014, we 
preliminarily determine the total net countervailable subsidy rate for 
DSM is 0.01 percent which is de minimis. We preliminarily determine 
that the net countervailable subsidy rate for Hyundai Steel, the firm 
subject to the NSR, is 0.23 percent ad valorem, which is de minimis.

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department intends to disclose to parties to this proceeding 
the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within 
five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\6\ 
Interested parties may submit written arguments (case briefs) within 30 
days of publication of the preliminary results and rebuttal comments 
(rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing the 
case briefs.\7\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must 
be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit 
arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) Statement of 
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); 351.309(d)(1); and 19 CFR 
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date 
of publication of this notice.\8\ Requests should contain the party's 
name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a 
list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, 
we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing, which 
will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location 
to be determined.\9\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, 
time, and location of the hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Parties are reminded that briefs and hearing requests are to be 
filed electronically using ACCESS and that electronically filed 
documents must be received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m 
Eastern Time on the due date.
    Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the 
issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after 
issuance of these preliminary results.

Assessment Rates

    The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of 
publication of the final results of this review. If the final results 
remain the same as these preliminary results, the Department will 
instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to CVDs all shipments of 
subject merchandise produced by DSM and Hyundai Steel entered or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption from January 1, 2014, through 
December 31, 2014.

Cash Deposit Instructions

    The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 
deposits of zero percent on shipments of the subject merchandise 
produced and/or exported by DSM and Hyundai Steel entered or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of 
the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will 
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate 
applicable to the company. These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
    This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.

    Dated: March 4, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

    List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum:

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Attribution of Subsidies
5. Analysis of Programs
    A. Programs Preliminarily Determined to be Countervailable
    B. Programs Preliminarily Determined Not To Confer a Benefit
    C. Additional Programs Preliminarily Determined That Were not 
Used During the POR
6. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-05569 Filed 3-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

13330 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Notices V. Changes Since the Preliminary DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE rolled products, hot-rolled, of a nominal Determination or actual thickness of 4.75 mm or more VI. Use of Adverse Facts Available International Trade Administration and of a width which exceeds 150 mm VII. Discussion of Interested Party Comments and measures at least twice the [C–580–837] Comment 1: Whether Critical thickness, and which are cut-to-length Circumstances Exist Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality (not in coils).2 Comment 2: Whether Ester Should Be a Steel Plate From the Republic of The merchandise subject to the Order Mandatory Respondent in This Korea: Preliminary Results of is currently classifiable in the HTSUS Investigation under subheadings: 7208.40.3030, Countervailing Duty Administrative Comment 3: Whether the Department 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, Review and New Shipper Review; Should Recalculate Imputed Credit 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, Calendar Year 2014 Comment 4: Whether the Department 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, Should Recalculate Home Market Inland AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, Freight International Trade Administration, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, Comment 5: Whether the Department Department of Commerce. 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, Should Make a Duty Drawback SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, Adjustment (the Department) is conducting an 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, Comment 6: Whether to Adjust Ester’s G&A administrative review and new shipper Ratio 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, review (NSR) of the countervailing duty 7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, Comment 7: Whether to Adjust Ester’s (CVD) order on certain cut-to-length 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, Financial Expense Ratio carbon-quality steel plate from the 7226.91.8000, 7226.99.0000. While Comment 8: Whether to Include Import Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of HTSUS subheadings are provided for Taxes in the Total Cost of Manufacture review (POR) for the CVD review and convenience and customs purposes, the Comment 9: Whether to Rely on Ester’s the NSR is January 1, 2014, through written description of the scope of this Revised Packing Costs December 31, 2014. The Department Order is dispositive.3 Comment 10: Whether to Revise Reliance’s COP Using Reliance’s Verified Actual preliminary determines that Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM), the firm Methodology Chain Costs Comment 11: Whether the Department examined in the administrative review, The Department conducted this Should Use its Differential Pricing and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai review in accordance with section Analysis in the Final Determination Steel), the firm examined in the NSR, 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Comment 12: Whether to Use Invoice Date each received a de minimis net subsidy amended (the Act).4 For a full as the Date of Sale in Both Markets rate during the POR. Interested parties description of the methodology Comment 13: Whether to Resort to Adverse are invited to comment on these underlying our conclusions, see the Facts Available for Reliance preliminary results. accompanying Preliminary Decision A. Whether Reliance Failed to Submit All DATES: Effective March 14, 2016. Memorandum, dated concurrently with Home Market Sales Subject to the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John these results and hereby adopted by this Investigation Conniff (for Hyundai Steel) or Jolanta notice. The Preliminary Decision B. Whether Reliance Provided a Complete Lawska (for DSM), AD/CVD Operations, Memorandum is a public document and Home Market Sales Listing for Contract Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, is on file electronically via Enforcement Customers International Trade Administration, and Compliance’s Antidumping and C. Whether Reliance Reported the Wrong U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Countervailing Duty Centralized Date as the Sale Date for U.S. Sales Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Electronic Service System (ACCESS). D. Whether Reliance Wrongly Submitted a Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) ACCESS is available to registered users Claim for a Duty Drawback Adjustment 482–1009 and (202) 482–8362, at http://access.trade.gov and in the E. Whether Reliance Wrongly Submitted a respectively. Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of Claim for an Adjustment for the Focus the main Department of Commerce Product Scheme Scope of the Order building. In addition, a complete F. Whether the Department Failed to Verify The merchandise covered by the version of the Preliminary Decision Export Warranty Expenses Order 1 is certain hot-rolled carbon- Memorandum can be accessed directly G. Whether Reliance Incorrectly Included quality steel: (1) Universal mill plates on the Internet at http:// Third-Country Sales in its Home Market (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Sales Listing faces or in a closed box pass, of a width Preliminary Decision Memorandum and H. Whether Reliance Incorrectly Included the electronic version of the Preliminary exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding Free Samples in its Home Market Sales 1250 mm, and of a nominal or actual Listing thickness of not less than 4 mm, which 2 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary I. Whether Reliance Knowingly Withheld Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative are cut-to-length (not in coils) and its U.S. and Home Market Short-Term Review and New Shipper Review, and the without patterns in relief), of iron or Preliminary Intent to Rescind in Part: Certain Cut- Interest Rates non-alloy-quality steel; and (2) flat- to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the J. Whether Reliance Failed to Accurately Republic of Korea,’’ from Chris Marsh, Deputy Provide Its U.S. and Home Market 1 See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Selling Functions Plate from India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES K. Whether Reliance Incorrectly Offset Korea: Continuation of Antidumping and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and General and Administrative Expenses Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 264 (January 4, Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice 2012) (the Order); see also Notice of Amended Final (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) for a complete L. Use of Total Adverse Facts Available description of the scope of the Order. Determination: Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon– Comment 14: Proper AFA Rate Quality Steel Plate From India and the Republic of 3 See Order. VIII. Recommendation Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: 4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act [FR Doc. 2016–05710 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am] Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon–Quality Steel Plate regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) From France, India, Indonesia, Italy, and the of the Act regarding benefit; and, section 771(5A) BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000). of the Act regarding specificity. VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:27 Mar 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Notices 13331 Decision Memorandum are identical in U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 3. Scope of the Order content. Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 4. Attribution of Subsidies Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 5. Analysis of Programs Preliminary Results of the Review 5 A. Programs Preliminarily Determined to location to be determined.9 Parties In accordance with 19 CFR be Countervailable should confirm by telephone the date, B. Programs Preliminarily Determined Not 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an time, and location of the hearing. To Confer a Benefit individual subsidy rate for DSM, the Parties are reminded that briefs and C. Additional Programs Preliminarily firm subject to the administrative hearing requests are to be filed Determined That Were not Used During review. For the period January 1, 2014, electronically using ACCESS and that the POR through December 31, 2014, we electronically filed documents must be 6. Recommendation preliminarily determine the total net received successfully in their entirety by [FR Doc. 2016–05569 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am] countervailable subsidy rate for DSM is 5:00 p.m Eastern Time on the due date. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 0.01 percent which is de minimis. We Unless the deadline is extended preliminarily determine that the net pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the countervailable subsidy rate for Act, the Department will issue the final DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Hyundai Steel, the firm subject to the results of this administrative review, NSR, is 0.23 percent ad valorem, which including the results of our analysis of International Trade Administration is de minimis. the issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after [A–570–024] Disclosure and Public Comment issuance of these preliminary results. Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate The Department intends to disclose to Assessment Rates Resin From the People’s Republic of parties to this proceeding the The Department intends to issue China: Final Determination of Sales at calculations performed in reaching the assessment instructions to U.S. Customs Less Than Fair Value preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, preliminary results.6 Interested parties after the date of publication of the final International Trade Administration, may submit written arguments (case results of this review. If the final results Department of Commerce. briefs) within 30 days of publication of remain the same as these preliminary SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce the preliminary results and rebuttal results, the Department will instruct (the Department) determines that comments (rebuttal briefs) within five CBP to liquidate without regard to CVDs imports of certain polyethylene days after the time limit for filing the all shipments of subject merchandise terephthalate resin (PET resin) from the case briefs.7 Pursuant to 19 CFR produced by DSM and Hyundai Steel People’s Republic of China (PRC) are 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be entered or withdrawn from warehouse, being sold in the United States at less limited to issues raised in the case for consumption from January 1, 2014, than fair value (LTFV), as provided in briefs. Parties who submit arguments are through December 31, 2014. section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as requested to submit with the argument: Cash Deposit Instructions amended (the Act). The final weighted- (1) Statement of the issue; (2) a brief average dumping margins of sales at summary of the argument; and (3) a The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of LTFV are listed in the ‘‘Final table of authorities. Determination Margins’’ section, infra. Interested parties who wish to request zero percent on shipments of the subject merchandise produced and/or exported DATES: Effective Date: March 14, 2016. a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for by DSM and Hyundai Steel entered or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. withdrawn from warehouse, for Steve Bezirganian or Tyler Weinhold, Department of Commerce, within 30 consumption on or after the date of AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, days after the date of publication of this publication of the final results of this Enforcement and Compliance, notice.8 Requests should contain the review. For all non-reviewed firms, we International Trade Administration, party’s name, address, and telephone will instruct CBP to collect cash U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 number, the number of participants, and deposits of estimated countervailing Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, a list of the issues to be discussed. If a duties at the most recent company- DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1131 or request for a hearing is made, we will specific or all-others rate applicable to (202) 482–1121, respectively. inform parties of the scheduled date for the company. These cash deposit SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the hearing, which will be held at the requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Background 5 As explained in the memorandum from the This administrative review and notice On October 15, 2015, the Department Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and are in accordance with sections of Commerce (Department) published in Compliance, the Department has exercised its 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 the Federal Register the preliminary discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due CFR 351.213. to the recent closure of the Federal Government. determination in the LTFV investigation See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Dated: March 4, 2016. of PET resin from the PRC.1 For a Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Paul Piquado, Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative 1 See Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016. Compliance. Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding Postponement of Final Determination, 80 FR 62024 have been extended by four business days. The Appendix (October 15, 2015) (Preliminary Determination). We revised deadline for the preliminary determination List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary later published a correction to that notice, which of this administrative review and NSR is now corrected errors in the weighted-average margin Decision Memorandum: March 4, 2016. chart appearing in the Preliminary Determination 6 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 1. Summary (see Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin From 7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); 351.309(d)(1); and 2. Background the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Correction 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). to Preliminary Affirmative Less Than Fair Value 8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 9 See 19 CFR 351.310. Determination, 80 FR 69643 (November 10, 2015). VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:27 Mar 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM 14MRN1


Document Created: 2016-03-12 01:00:58
Document Modified: 2016-03-12 01:00:58
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective March 14, 2016.
ContactJohn Conniff (for Hyundai Steel) or Jolanta Lawska (for DSM), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1009 and (202) 482-8362, respectively.
FR Citation81 FR 13330 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR