81_FR_13490 81 FR 13441 - Foreign Affairs Policy Board Meeting Notice; Closed Meeting

81 FR 13441 - Foreign Affairs Policy Board Meeting Notice; Closed Meeting

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 49 (March 14, 2016)

Page Range13441-13441
FR Document2016-05676

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 13441]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05676]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9476]


Foreign Affairs Policy Board Meeting Notice; Closed Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 
App., the Department of State announces a meeting of the Foreign 
Affairs Policy Board to take place on March 28, 2016, at the Department 
of State, Washington, DC.
    The Foreign Affairs Policy Board reviews and assesses: (1) Global 
threats and opportunities; (2) trends that implicate core national 
security interests; (3) tools and capacities of the civilian foreign 
affairs agencies; and (4) priorities and strategic frameworks for U.S. 
foreign policy. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been 
determined that this meeting will be closed to the public as the Board 
will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in 
accordance with Executive Order 13526.
    For more information, contact Adam Lusin at (202) 647-4967.

    Dated: March 7, 2016.
Adam Lusin,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-05676 Filed 3-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P



                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2016 / Notices                                                   13441

                                                  certain number of pieces of evidence                    adjudicative action in any claim. A                   DEPARTMENT OF STATE
                                                  (e.g., five or six) must be present. It is              person may still be found entitled to, or
                                                  possible that just one piece of evidence                eligible for, monthly benefits despite the            [Public Notice 9474]
                                                  may be so convincing that it outweighs                  fact that some evidence in the case
                                                  more than one piece of evidence in                      record has been disregarded based on                  In the Matter of the Designation of
                                                  opposition.                                             similar fault. For example, a person may              Abdul Saboor, aka Engineer Saboor,
                                                                                                          be found to be under a disability based               aka Abdul Saboor Nasratyar as a
                                                  C. Development and Evaluation                                                                                 Specially Designated Global Terrorist
                                                                                                          on impairments that are established by
                                                     Adjudicators at all levels of the
                                                                                                          evidence that is not disregarded because                 Acting under the authority of and in
                                                  administrative review process are
                                                                                                          of similar fault.                                     accordance with section 1(b) of
                                                  responsible for taking all appropriate
                                                  steps to resolve similar fault issues in                   5. Include standard appeal language.               Executive Order 13224 of September 23,
                                                  accordance with the standards in this                                                                         2001, as amended by Executive Order
                                                                                                             EFFECTIVE DATE: This SSR is                        13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive
                                                  Ruling. Adjudicators must adhere to                     effective on March 14, 2016.
                                                  existing due process and confidentiality                                                                      Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I
                                                                                                             CROSS-REFERENCES: SSR 85–23,                       hereby determine that the individual
                                                  requirements during the process of
                                                  resolving similar fault issues.                         ‘‘Title XVI: Reopening Supplemental                   known as Abdul Saboor, also known as
                                                     In making determinations about                       Security Income Determinations at Any                 Engineer Saboor, also known as Abdul
                                                  whether there is similar fault, all                     Time for Similar Fault.’’                             Saboor Nasratyar committed, or poses a
                                                  adjudicators must:                                      [FR Doc. 2016–05660 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am]           significant risk of committing, acts of
                                                     1. Consider all evidence in the case                                                                       terrorism that threaten the security of
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
                                                  record before determining whether                                                                             U.S. nationals or the national security,
                                                  specific evidence may be disregarded.                                                                         foreign policy, or economy of the United
                                                     2. Apply the preponderance of                                                                              States.
                                                  evidence standard, as defined in this                   DEPARTMENT OF STATE                                      Consistent with the determination in
                                                  Ruling.                                                                                                       section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that
                                                     3. Fully document the record with the                                                                      ‘‘prior notice to persons determined to
                                                                                                          [Public Notice: 9476]                                 be subject to the Order who might have
                                                  evidence that was the basis for the
                                                  finding that, based on a preponderance                                                                        a constitutional presence in the United
                                                                                                          Foreign Affairs Policy Board Meeting                  States would render ineffectual the
                                                  of the evidence, there is reason to                     Notice; Closed Meeting
                                                  believe that similar fault was involved                                                                       blocking and other measures authorized
                                                  in providing the evidence that is being                                                                       in the Order because of the ability to
                                                                                                             In accordance with the Federal
                                                  disregarded.                                                                                                  transfer funds instantaneously,’’ I
                                                                                                          Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.,                determine that no prior notice needs to
                                                  D. Notice of Determination or Decision                  the Department of State announces a                   be provided to any person subject to this
                                                    In determinations or decisions that                   meeting of the Foreign Affairs Policy                 determination who might have a
                                                  involve a finding of similar fault and                  Board to take place on March 28, 2016,                constitutional presence in the United
                                                  disregarding evidence, the notice of                    at the Department of State, Washington,               States, because to do so would render
                                                  determination or decision must:                         DC.                                                   ineffectual the measures authorized in
                                                    1. Explain the applicable provision of                   The Foreign Affairs Policy Board                   the Order.
                                                  the Act that allows the adjudicator to                  reviews and assesses: (1) Global threats                 This notice shall be published in the
                                                  disregard particular evidence due to a                  and opportunities; (2) trends that                    Federal Register.
                                                  similar fault finding.                                  implicate core national security                        Dated: March 4, 2016.
                                                    2. Identify the documents or other                    interests; (3) tools and capacities of the            John F. Kerry,
                                                  evidence that is being disregarded.                     civilian foreign affairs agencies; and (4)
                                                    3. Provide a discussion of the                                                                              Secretary of State.
                                                                                                          priorities and strategic frameworks for               [FR Doc. 2016–05673 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  evidence that supports a finding to
                                                                                                          U.S. foreign policy. Pursuant to section
                                                  disregard evidence. The discussion                                                                            BILLING CODE 4710–AD–P
                                                                                                          10(d) of the Federal Advisory
                                                  must explain that, in accordance with
                                                  the law, the evidence identified cannot                 Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 10(d), and
                                                  be used as evidence in the claim                        5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been                      DEPARTMENT OF STATE
                                                  because, after considering all the                      determined that this meeting will be
                                                                                                          closed to the public as the Board will be             [Public Notice: 9459]
                                                  information in the case record, the
                                                  adjudicator has reason to believe that                  reviewing and discussing matters
                                                                                                          properly classified in accordance with                Notice of Meeting of the Cultural
                                                  similar fault was involved in providing                                                                       Property Advisory Committee
                                                  the evidence and it must be disregarded.                Executive Order 13526.
                                                  Again, a similar fault finding can be                      For more information, contact Adam                    There will be a meeting of the
                                                  made only if there is reason to believe,                Lusin at (202) 647–4967.                              Cultural Property Advisory Committee
                                                  based on a preponderance of the                                                                               (‘‘the Committee’’) May 24–26, 2016, at
                                                                                                            Dated: March 7, 2016.                               the United States Department of State,
                                                  evidence, the person knew that the
                                                  evidence provided was false or                          Adam Lusin,                                           Harry S Truman Building, 2201 C Street
                                                  incomplete. A similar fault finding                     Designated Federal Officer.                           NW., and State Annex 5, 2200 C Street
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  cannot be based on speculation or                       [FR Doc. 2016–05676 Filed 3–11–16; 8:45 am]           NW., Washington, DC. The Committee’s
                                                  suspicion.                                              BILLING CODE 4710–05–P                                responsibilities are carried out in
                                                    4. Provide a determination or decision                                                                      accordance with provisions of the
                                                  based on an evaluation of the remaining                                                                       Convention on Cultural Property
                                                  evidence in accordance with other rules                                                                       Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et
                                                  and procedures. A similar fault finding                                                                       seq.) (‘‘the Act’’). A portion of this
                                                  does not constitute complete                                                                                  meeting will be closed to the public


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:27 Mar 11, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00132   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM   14MRN1



Document Created: 2016-03-12 01:00:14
Document Modified: 2016-03-12 01:00:14
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 13441 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR