81 FR 1368 - Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 17 Petitions
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 7 (January 12, 2016)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 7 (January 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 1368-1375 | |
| FR Document | 2016-00157 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 1368-1375] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-00157] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [4500030115] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 17 Petitions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Petition findings and initiation of status reviews. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90- day findings on various petitions to list, reclassify, or delist fish, wildlife, or plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that six petitions do not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, and we are not initiating status reviews in response to these petitions. We refer to these as ``not-substantial'' petition findings. We also find that 11 petitions present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted. Therefore, with the publication of this document, we announce that we plan to initiate a review of the status of these species to determine if the petitioned actions are warranted. To ensure that these status reviews are comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and other information regarding these species. Based on the status reviews, we will issue 12-month findings on the petitions, which will address whether the petitioned action is warranted, as provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. DATES: When we conduct status reviews, we will consider all information that we have received. To ensure that we will have adequate time to consider submitted information during the status reviews, we request that we receive information no later than March 14, 2016. Information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES) should be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition findings: The not-substantial petition findings announced in this document are available on http://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see Table 2 in this section), or on the Service's Web site at ecos.fws.gov. Supporting information in preparing these findings is available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours by contacting the appropriate person, as specified under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Status reviews: You may submit information on species for which a status review is being initiated by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket number (see Table 1, below). You may submit information by clicking on ``Comment Now!'' If your information will fit in the provided comment box, please use this feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with our information review procedures. If you attach your information as a separate document, our preferred file format is [[Page 1369]] Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format is a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel. (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see Table 1, below]; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803. We request that you send information only by the methods described above. We will post all information received on http://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for Status Reviews in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more details). Table 1--List of Substantial Findings for Which a Status Review Is Being Initiated -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Culebra skink................ FWS-R4-ES-2015-0085.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0085. Great Basin silverspot FWS-R6-ES-2015-0089.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0089. butterfly. Greater Saint Croix skink.... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0090.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0090. Greater Virgin Islands skink. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0091.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0091. Lesser Saint Croix skink..... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0096.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0096. Mona skink................... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0100.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0100. Narrow-foot diving beetle.... FWS-R6-ES-2015-0102.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0102. Northern Rockies population FWS-R6-ES-2015-0104.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0104. of fisher. Puerto Rican skink........... FWS-R4-ES-2015-0107.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0107. Scott riffle beetle.......... FWS-R6-ES-2015-0114.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0114. Virgin Islands bronze skink.. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0120.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0120. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2--List of Not-Substantial Findings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Colorado desert fringe-toed FWS-R8-ES-2015-0082.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-0082. lizard. Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak FWS-R6-ES-2015-0173.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0173. population)--Uplist. Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak FWS-R6-ES-2015-0174.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0174. population)--Delist. Kings River slender salamander FWS-R8-ES-2015-0094.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-0094. Sandstone night lizard........ FWS-R8-ES-2015-0113.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-0113. Yellowstone bison............. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0123.................. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0123. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Common name Contact person ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard..... Mendel Stewart, 760-431-9440; [email protected]. Culebra skink.......................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Great Basin silverspot butterfly....... Ann Timberman, 970-628-7181; [email protected]. Greater Saint Croix skink.............. Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Greater Virgin Islands skink........... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population). Chris Servheen, 406-243-4903; [email protected]. Kings River slender salamander......... Jennifer Norris, 916-414-6600; [email protected]. Lesser Saint Croix skink............... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Mona skink............................. Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Narrow-foot diving beetle.............. Mark Sattelberg, 307-772-2374; [email protected]. Northern Rockies population of fisher.. Jodi Bush, 406-449-5225 x105; [email protected]. Puerto Rican skink..................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Sandstone Night lizard................. Mendel Stewart, 760-431-9440; [email protected]. Scott riffle beetle.................... Jason Luginbill, 785-539-3474 x105; [email protected]. Virgin Islands bronze skink............ Andreas Moshogianis, 404-679- 7119; [email protected]. Yellowstone bison...................... Mark Sattelberg, 307-772-2374; [email protected]. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for Information for Status Reviews When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial information indicating that listing, reclassification, or delisting a species may be warranted, we are required to review the status of the species (status review). For the status review to be complete and based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we request information on these species from governmental agencies, Native American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any [[Page 1370]] other interested parties. We seek information on: (1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including: (a) Habitat requirements; (b) Genetics and taxonomy; (c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns; (d) Historical and current population levels, and current and projected trends; and (e) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the species, its habitat, or both. (2) The factors that are the basis for making a listing, reclassification, or delisting determination for a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: (a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A); (b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes (Factor B); (c) Disease or predation (Factor C); (d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); or (e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (Factor E). (3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat, and the extent to which it affects the habitat or range of the species. If, after the status review, we determine that listing is warranted, we will propose critical habitat (see definition in section 3(5)(A) of the Act) for domestic (U.S.) species under section 4 of the Act, to the maximum extent prudent and determinable at the time we propose to list the species. Therefore, we also request data and information for the species listed above in Table 1 (to be submitted as provided for in the ADDRESSES section) on: (1) What may constitute ``physical or biological features essential to the conservation of the species,'' within the geographical range occupied by the species; (2) Where these features are currently found; (3) Whether any of these features may require special management considerations or protection; (4) Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species that are ``essential for the conservation of the species''; and (5) What, if any, critical habitat you think we should propose for designation if the species is proposed for listing, and why such habitat meets the requirements of section 4 of the Act. Please include sufficient information with your submission (such as scientific journal articles or other publications) to allow us to verify any scientific or commercial information you include. Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions under consideration without providing supporting information, although noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.'' You may submit your information concerning these status reviews by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you submit information via http://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission-- including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the Web site. If you submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal identifying information from public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all hardcopy submissions on http://www.regulations.gov. Information and supporting documentation that we received and used in preparing these 90-day findings is available for you to review at http://www.regulations.gov, or you may make an appointment during normal business hours at the appropriate lead U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office (contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Background Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on whether a petition to list, delist, or reclassify a species presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable, we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the petition and publish our notice of the finding promptly in the Federal Register. Our standard for substantial scientific or commercial information within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) with regard to a 90-day petition finding is ``that amount of information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition may be warranted'' (50 CFR 424.14(b)). If we find that substantial scientific or commercial information was presented, we are required to promptly commence a review of the status of the species, which will be subsequently summarized in our 12-month finding. Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing regulations at 50 CFR 424 set forth the procedures for adding a species to, or removing a species from, the Federal Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. A species may be determined to be an endangered or threatened species because of one or more of the five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). In considering whether conditions described within one or more of the factors might constitute threats, we must look beyond the exposure of the species to those conditions to evaluate whether the species may respond to the conditions in a way that causes actual impacts to the species. If there is exposure to a condition and the species responds negatively, the condition qualify as a stressors and, during the subsequent status review, we attempt to determine how significant the stressor is. If the stressor is sufficiently significant that it drives, or contributes to, the risk of extinction of the species such that the species may warrant listing as endangered or threatened as those terms are defined in the Act, the stressor constitutes a threat to the species. Thus, the identification of conditions that could affect a species negatively may not be sufficient to compel a finding that the information in the petition and our files is substantial. The information must include evidence sufficient to suggest that these conditions may be operative threats that act on the species to a sufficient degree that the species may meet the definition of an endangered or threatened species under the Act. Evaluation of a Petition To List the Colorado Desert Fringe-Toed Lizard as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0082 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard (Uma notata); California, Baja California, Mexico Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard, be listed under [[Page 1371]] the Act as endangered or threatened species and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard (Uma notata). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0082 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Culebra Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0085 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Culebra skink (Spondylurus culebrae); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, Greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the Culebra skink (Spondylurus culebrae). Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Culebra skink (Spondylurus culebrae) may be warranted based on Factors C and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Great Basin Silverspot as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0089 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Great Basin silverspot (Speyeria nokomis nokomis); Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah Petition History On April 24, 2013, we received a petition dated April 13, 2013, from WildEarth Guardians, requesting that the Great Basin silverspot be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Great Basin silverspot (Speyeria nokomis nokomis) may be warranted based on Factors A and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Greater Saint Croix Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0090 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Greater Saint Croix skink (Spondylurus magnacruzae); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the greater Saint Croix skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the greater Saint Croix skink (Spondylurus magnacruzae) may be warranted based on Factors C and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Greater Virgin Islands Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0091 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Greater Virgin Islands skink (Spondylurus spilonotus); Caribbean [[Page 1372]] Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the greater Virgin Islands skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the greater Virgin Islands skink (Spondylurus spilonotus) may be warranted based on Factors C and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To Reclassify the Grizzly Bear (Cabinet-Yaak Population) From a Threatened Species to an Endangered Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0173 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population) (Ursus arctos horribilis); Montana, Idaho Petition History On December 17, 2014, we received a petition dated December 11, 2014, from the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, requesting that the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bear be reclassified as endangered and that critical habitat be designated for this population under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a February 2, 2015, letter to the petitioner acknowledging receipt of the petition, we responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing. This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (reclassifying from threatened status to endangered status) may be warranted for the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that reclassifying the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bear may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0173 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this population or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Evaluation of a Petition To Remove the Grizzly Bear (Cabinet-Yaak Population) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0174 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population) (Ursus arctos horribilis); Montana, Idaho Petition History On July 27, 2015, we received a petition dated July 24, 2015, from Lincoln County, Montana, requesting that we remove Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bears from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (i.e., ``delist'' Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bears) due to recovery under the Act. Grizzly bears, including the Cabinet-Yaak population, are currently listed as threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an August 21, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we received the petition. This finding addresses this portion of the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action (delisting) may be warranted for the Cabinet-Yaak population of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that delisting the Cabinet- Yaak population of grizzly bear may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0174 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this population or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Kings River Slender Salamander as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0094 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Kings River slender salamander (Batrachoseps regius); California Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from the Center for Biological Diversity requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the Kings River slender salamander, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the Kings River slender salamander. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the [[Page 1373]] petitioned action may be warranted for the Kings River slender salamander (Batrachoseps regius). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the Kings River slender salamander may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0094 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Lesser Saint Croix Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0096 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Lesser Saint Croix skink (Capitellum parvicruzae); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the lesser Saint Croix skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the lesser Saint Croix skink (Capitellum parvicruzae) may be warranted based on Factors C and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Mona Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0100 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Mona skink (Spondylurus monae); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the Mona skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Mona skink (Spondylurus monae) may be warranted based on Factors A, C, and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Narrow-Foot Diving Beetle as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0102 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Narrow-foot diving beetle (Hygrotus diversipes); Wyoming Petition History On July 17, 2013, we received a petition dated July 9, 2013, from WildEarth Guardians, requesting that the narrow-foot diving beetle be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the narrow-foot diving beetle. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the narrow-foot diving beetle (Hygrotus diversipes) may be warranted based on Factors A and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Fisher (Northern Rockies Population) as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0104 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Fisher (Northern Rockies population) (Martes pennanti); Idaho, Montana Petition History On September 23, 2013, we received a petition dated September 23, 2013, from the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Bitterroot, Friends of the Clearwater, Western Watersheds Project, and Friends of the Wild Swan, requesting that the fisher in its U.S. Northern Rocky Mountains (USNRMs) range be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In an October 31, 2013, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the [[Page 1374]] petition warranted an emergency listing. This finding addresses the petition. On June 30, 2011, we published a 12-month finding (76 FR 38504) following a full status review of fishers in the USNRMs that concluded listing the entity as endangered or threatened under the Act was not warranted. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, including new information that petitioners submitted after the 2011 finding, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the fisher (Northern Rockies population) (Martes pennanti) may be warranted based on Factors B and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. In the course of reviewing the status of the species, we will consider any information that has become available since the 2011 finding, including the new information provided by the petitioners. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Puerto Rico Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0107 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Puerto Rico skink (Spondylurus nitidus); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the Puerto Rican skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Puerto Rico skink (Spondylurus nitidus) may be warranted based on Factors A, C, and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Sandstone Night Lizard as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0113 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Sandstone night lizard (Xantusia gracilis); California Petition History On July 11, 2012, we received a petition dated July 11, 2012, from the Center for Biological Diversity requesting that 53 species of reptiles and amphibians, including the sandstone night lizard, be listed under the Act as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition does not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the sandstone night lizard (Xantusia gracilis). Because the petition does not present substantial information indicating that listing the sandstone night lizard may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this species in response to this petition. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2015-0113 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this species or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Scott Riffle Beetle as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0114 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Scott riffle beetle (Optioservus phaeus gilbert); Kansas Petition History On September 20, 2013, we received a petition dated September 18, 2013, from WildEarth Guardians, requesting that the Scott riffle beetle be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). This finding addresses the petition. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Scott riffle beetle (Optioservus phaeus gilbert) may be warranted based on Factors A, C, D, and E. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Virgin Islands Bronze Skink as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2015-0120 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Virgin Islands bronze skink (Spondylurus sloanii); Caribbean Petition History On February 11, 2014, we received a petition dated February 11, 2014, from the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that the Culebra skink, [[Page 1375]] greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be listed as endangered or threatened and that critical habitat be designated for these species under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged receipt of this petition via email on February 12, 2014. This finding addresses the Virgin Islands bronze skink. Finding Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the Virgin Islands bronze skink (Spondylurus sloanii) may be warranted based on Factors C and D. However, during our status review, we will thoroughly evaluate all potential threats to the species. Thus, for this species, the Service requests information on the five listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, including the factors identified in this finding (see Request for Information for Status Reviews, above). Evaluation of a Petition To List the Yellowstone Bison as an Endangered or Threatened Species Under the Act Additional information regarding our review of this petition can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015-0123 under the Supporting Documents section. Species and Range Yellowstone bison (Bison bison bison); Wyoming Petition History On November 14, 2014, we received a petition dated November 13, 2014, from the Western Watersheds Project and Buffalo Field Campaign, requesting that Yellowstone National Park bison be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). On March 2, 2015, we received a second petition dated March 2, 2015, from Mr. James A. Horsley, requesting that Yellowstone National Park bison be listed as endangered or threatened under the Act. The petition clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR 424.14(a). In a March 24, 2015, letter to the petitioner, we responded that we reviewed the information presented in the petition and did not find that the petition warranted an emergency listing. This finding addresses both petitions, as they request the same action for the same entity. Finding Based on our review of the petitions and sources cited in the petitions, we find that the petitions do not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Yellowstone bison (Bison bison bison). Because the petitions do not present substantial information indicating that listing the Yellowstone bison may be warranted, we are not initiating a status review of this subspecies in response to these petitions. Our justification for this finding can be found as an appendix at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R6-ES-2015- 0123 under the Supporting Documents section. However, we ask that the public submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of, or threats to, this subspecies or its habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Conclusion On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have determined that the petitions summarized above for the Cabinet-Yaak population of grizzly bear (two petitions), Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard, Kings River slender salamander, sandstone night lizard, and the Yellowstone bison do not present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be warranted. Therefore, we are not initiating status reviews for these species. The petitions summarized above for the Culebra skink, Great Basin silverspot butterfly, greater Saint Croix skink, greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, narrow-foot diving beetle, Northern Rockies population of fisher, Puerto Rico skink, Scott riffle beetle, and Virgin Islands bronze skink present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the requested actions may be warranted. Because we have found that these petitions present substantial information indicating that the petitioned actions may be warranted, we are initiating status reviews to determine whether these actions under the Act are warranted. At the conclusion of the status reviews, we will issue a finding, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to whether or not the Service believes listing is warranted. It is important to note that the standard for a 90-day finding differs from the Act's standard that applies to a status review to determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. In making a 90-day finding, we consider only the information in the petition and in our files, and we evaluate merely whether that constitutes ``substantial information'' indicating that the petitioned action ``may be warranted.'' In a 12-month finding, we must complete a thorough status review of the species and evaluate the ``best scientific and commercial data available'' to determine whether a petitioned action ``is warranted.'' Because the Act's standards for 90-day and 12-month findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that the 12-month finding will result in a ``warranted'' finding. References Cited A complete list of references cited is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and upon request from the appropriate lead field offices (contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Authors The primary authors of this notice are staff members of the Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Authority The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: December 31, 2015. Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 2016-00157 Filed 1-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![1368 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
4. Capacity of a Rule Under TSCA 8(a), V. References not present substantial scientific or
8(c), or 8(d) To Alter the Identification The following is a listing of the commercial information indicating that
of New and Existing Chemical documents that are specifically the petitioned actions may be
Substances Under the SDA Naming referenced in this document. The docket warranted, and we are not initiating
Convention includes these documents and other status reviews in response to these
information considered by EPA, petitions. We refer to these as ‘‘not-
Even if the petition had established substantial’’ petition findings. We also
including documents that are referenced
that a rulemaking proceeding is within the documents that are included find that 11 petitions present substantial
necessary, the petition would still be in the docket, even if the referenced scientific or commercial information
deficient. While the petition states in document is not physically located in indicating that the petitioned actions
very general terms that it is seeking a the docket. For assistance in locating may be warranted. Therefore, with the
change to the legal status quo (i.e., these other documents, please consult publication of this document, we
establish some regulatory process ‘‘to the technical person listed under FOR announce that we plan to initiate a
allow’’ certain chemical substances FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. review of the status of these species to
derived from new sources of natural fats 1. Biobased and Renewable Products determine if the petitioned actions are
and oils to be nonetheless deemed Advocacy Group. Petition to warranted. To ensure that these status
existing chemicals), the petition still Promulgate Rule Pursuant to reviews are comprehensive, we are
fails to explain how a rule under TSCA Section 8 of the Toxic Substances requesting scientific and commercial
section 8 could be crafted to accomplish Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2620, data and other information regarding
that objective. Rules under 8(c) and 8(d) Concerning Equivalency these species. Based on the status
only cover reporting and retention of Determinations for Class 2 reviews, we will issue 12-month
certain health and safety related Substances. October 5, 2015. findings on the petitions, which will
documents; they are inapposite to the 2. United States Environmental address whether the petitioned action is
stated objective. Nor does the petition Protection Agency. Toxic warranted, as provided in section
suggest any plan to make specific use of Substances Control Act Pl 94–469, 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
EPA’s rulemaking authorities under Candidate List of Chemical DATES: When we conduct status
sections 8(c) or 8(d). Rules under Substances, Addendum III: reviews, we will consider all
section 8(a) are somewhat broader in Chemical Substances of Unknown information that we have received. To
potential scope, but once again, the or Variable Composition, Complex ensure that we will have adequate time
rulemaking authority at issue here is Reaction Products and Biological to consider submitted information
inapposite; it is to require current or Materials. Washington, DC, March during the status reviews, we request
prospective manufacturers or processors 1978. that we receive information no later
of a chemical substance to supply than March 14, 2016. Information
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Chapter I submitted electronically using the
existing information relating to that
chemical substance. While, historically, Environmental protection, Natural Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
sources of oil and fat, SDA ADDRESSES) should be received by 11:59
information collected using a TSCA
section 8(a) rule provided the factual nomenclature system, TSCA Inventory. p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
basis for EPA’s assembly of the TSCA Dated: December 31, 2015. ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition
Inventory, TSCA section 8(a) does not James Jones, findings: The not-substantial petition
itself govern or authorize EPA’s Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical findings announced in this document
management of the TSCA Inventory. Safety and Pollution Prevention. are available on http://
That is instead authorized under TSCA [FR Doc. 2016–00435 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am]
www.regulations.gov under the
section 8(b). Yet TSCA section 8(b) does appropriate docket number (see Table 2
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
not contain an express grant of in this section), or on the Service’s Web
rulemaking authority, and EPA has site at ecos.fws.gov. Supporting
information in preparing these findings
never used rulemaking to establish or DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR is available for public inspection, by
make additions or changes to the
Fish and Wildlife Service appointment, during normal business
Inventory. For its part, the petition
hours by contacting the appropriate
merely makes a blanket assertion that
50 CFR Part 17 person, as specified under FOR FURTHER
‘‘EPA is authorized under TSCA section
INFORMATION CONTACT.
8 to commence a rulemaking.’’ [4500030115] Status reviews: You may submit
Especially since the text of TSCA information on species for which a
section 8(b) does not itself refer to Endangered and Threatened Wildlife status review is being initiated by one
rulemaking authority, and the and Plants; 90-Day Findings on 17 of the following methods:
petitioners are seeking a change in legal Petitions (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
requirements to ‘‘allow for new sources eRulemaking Portal: http://
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
to be added,’’ the absence of any Interior. www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
particular explanation in the petition enter the appropriate docket number
ACTION: Petition findings and initiation
describing how petitioners believe EPA (see Table 1, below). You may submit
of status reviews.
could issue an appropriate rule (under
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
information by clicking on ‘‘Comment
any subsection of TSCA section 8) is a SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Now!’’ If your information will fit in the
critical deficiency of the petition. Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90- provided comment box, please use this
Finally, to the extent that petitioners are day findings on various petitions to list, feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as
actually seeking an order under TSCA reclassify, or delist fish, wildlife, or it is most compatible with our
section 8(b), EPA notes that such plants under the Endangered Species information review procedures. If you
petitions are not cognizable under TSCA Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Based on attach your information as a separate
section 8, 15 U.S.C. 2620(b)(1). our review, we find that six petitions do document, our preferred file format is
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Jan 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1375/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules 1369
Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple docket number; see Table 1, below]; http://www.regulations.gov. This
comments (such as form letters), our U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: generally means that we will post any
preferred format is a spreadsheet in BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike; Falls personal information you provide us
Microsoft Excel. Church, VA 22041–3803. (see Request for Information for Status
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail We request that you send information Reviews in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments only by the methods described above. for more details).
Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate We will post all information received on
TABLE 1—LIST OF SUBSTANTIAL FINDINGS FOR WHICH A STATUS REVIEW IS BEING INITIATED
Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov
Culebra skink ............................................ FWS–R4–ES–2015–0085 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0085.
Great Basin silverspot butterfly ................ FWS–R6–ES–2015–0089 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0089.
Greater Saint Croix skink ......................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0090 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0090.
Greater Virgin Islands skink ..................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0091 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0091.
Lesser Saint Croix skink ........................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0096 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0096.
Mona skink ............................................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0100 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0100.
Narrow-foot diving beetle ......................... FWS–R6–ES–2015–0102 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0102.
Northern Rockies population of fisher ...... FWS–R6–ES–2015–0104 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0104.
Puerto Rican skink ................................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0107 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0107.
Scott riffle beetle ....................................... FWS–R6–ES–2015–0114 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-0114.
Virgin Islands bronze skink ...................... FWS–R4–ES–2015–0120 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R4-ES-2015-0120.
TABLE 2—LIST OF NOT-SUBSTANTIAL FINDINGS
Common name Docket No. URL to docket in regs.gov
Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard ............... FWS–R8–ES–2015–0082 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-
0082.
Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population)— FWS–R6–ES–2015–0173 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-
Uplist. 0173.
Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population)— FWS–R6–ES–2015–0174 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-
Delist. 0174.
Kings River slender salamander ................. FWS–R8–ES–2015–0094 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-
0094.
Sandstone night lizard ................................ FWS–R8–ES–2015–0113 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R8-ES-2015-
0113.
Yellowstone bison ....................................... FWS–R6–ES–2015–0123 ...... http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FWS-R6-ES-2015-
0123.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Common name Contact person
Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard ............................................................ Mendel Stewart, 760–431–9440; Mendel_Stewart@fws.gov.
Culebra skink ............................................................................................ Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Great Basin silverspot butterfly ................................................................ Ann Timberman, 970–628–7181; Ann_Timberman@fws.gov.
Greater Saint Croix skink ......................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Greater Virgin Islands skink ..................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Grizzly bear (Cabinet-Yaak population) ................................................... Chris Servheen, 406–243–4903; Chris_Servheen@fws.gov.
Kings River slender salamander .............................................................. Jennifer Norris, 916–414–6600; Jennifer_Norris@fws.gov.
Lesser Saint Croix skink ........................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Mona skink ............................................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Narrow-foot diving beetle ......................................................................... Mark Sattelberg, 307–772–2374; Mark_Sattelberg@fws.gov.
Northern Rockies population of fisher ...................................................... Jodi Bush, 406–449–5225 x105; Jodi_Bush@fws.gov.
Puerto Rican skink ................................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Sandstone Night lizard ............................................................................. Mendel Stewart, 760–431–9440; Mendel_Stewart@fws.gov.
Scott riffle beetle ....................................................................................... Jason Luginbill, 785–539–3474 x105; Jason_Luginbill@fws.gov.
Virgin Islands bronze skink ...................................................................... Andreas Moshogianis, 404–679–7119; Andreas_Moshgianis@fws.gov.
Yellowstone bison ..................................................................................... Mark Sattelberg, 307–772–2374; Mark_Sattelberg@fws.gov.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
If you use a telecommunications Request for Information for Status review the status of the species (status
device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Reviews review). For the status review to be
Federal Information Relay Service complete and based on the best
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339. When we make a finding that a available scientific and commercial
petition presents substantial information, we request information on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: information indicating that listing, these species from governmental
reclassification, or delisting a species agencies, Native American Tribes, the
may be warranted, we are required to scientific community, industry, and any
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Jan 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1375/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules 1375
greater Saint Croix skink, Mona skink, for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR determine whether these actions under
Puerto Rican skink, Virgin Islands 424.14(a). In a March 24, 2015, letter to the Act are warranted. At the conclusion
bronze skink, greater Virgin Islands the petitioner, we responded that we of the status reviews, we will issue a
skink, lesser Saint Croix skink, Monito reviewed the information presented in finding, in accordance with section
skink, and lesser Virgin Islands skink be the petition and did not find that the 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to whether or
listed as endangered or threatened and petition warranted an emergency listing. not the Service believes listing is
that critical habitat be designated for This finding addresses both petitions, warranted.
these species under the Act. The as they request the same action for the
petition clearly identified itself as such same entity. It is important to note that the
and included the requisite identification standard for a 90-day finding differs
Finding from the Act’s standard that applies to
information for the petitioner, required
at 50 CFR 424.14(a). We acknowledged Based on our review of the petitions a status review to determine whether a
receipt of this petition via email on and sources cited in the petitions, we petitioned action is warranted. In
February 12, 2014. This finding find that the petitions do not present making a 90-day finding, we consider
addresses the Virgin Islands bronze substantial scientific or commercial only the information in the petition and
skink. information indicating that the in our files, and we evaluate merely
petitioned action may be warranted for whether that constitutes ‘‘substantial
Finding the Yellowstone bison (Bison bison information’’ indicating that the
Based on our review of the petition bison). Because the petitions do not petitioned action ‘‘may be warranted.’’
and sources cited in the petition, we present substantial information In a 12-month finding, we must
find that the petition presents indicating that listing the Yellowstone
complete a thorough status review of the
substantial scientific or commercial bison may be warranted, we are not
species and evaluate the ‘‘best scientific
information indicating that listing the initiating a status review of this
subspecies in response to these and commercial data available’’ to
Virgin Islands bronze skink determine whether a petitioned action
(Spondylurus sloanii) may be warranted petitions. Our justification for this
finding can be found as an appendix at ‘‘is warranted.’’ Because the Act’s
based on Factors C and D. However, standards for 90-day and 12-month
during our status review, we will http://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2015–0123 findings are different, a substantial 90-
thoroughly evaluate all potential threats
under the Supporting Documents day finding does not mean that the 12-
to the species. Thus, for this species, the
section. However, we ask that the public month finding will result in a
Service requests information on the five
listing factors under section 4(a)(1) of submit to us any new information that ‘‘warranted’’ finding.
the Act, including the factors identified becomes available concerning the status References Cited
in this finding (see Request for of, or threats to, this subspecies or its
Information for Status Reviews, above). habitat at any time (see FOR FURTHER A complete list of references cited is
INFORMATION CONTACT). available on the Internet at http://
Evaluation of a Petition To List the
Conclusion www.regulations.gov and upon request
Yellowstone Bison as an Endangered or
from the appropriate lead field offices
Threatened Species Under the Act On the basis of our evaluation of the
(contact the person listed under FOR
Additional information regarding our information presented under section
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
review of this petition can be found as 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, we have
an appendix at http:// determined that the petitions Authors
www.regulations.gov under Docket No. summarized above for the Cabinet-Yaak
FWS–R6–ES–2015–0123 under the population of grizzly bear (two The primary authors of this notice are
Supporting Documents section. petitions), Colorado desert fringe-toed staff members of the Ecological Services
lizard, Kings River slender salamander, Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Species and Range sandstone night lizard, and the
Authority
Yellowstone bison (Bison bison bison); Yellowstone bison do not present
Wyoming substantial scientific or commercial The authority for these actions is the
information indicating that the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
Petition History requested actions may be warranted. amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
On November 14, 2014, we received Therefore, we are not initiating status
a petition dated November 13, 2014, reviews for these species. Dated: December 31, 2015.
from the Western Watersheds Project The petitions summarized above for Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
and Buffalo Field Campaign, requesting the Culebra skink, Great Basin silverspot Service.
that Yellowstone National Park bison be butterfly, greater Saint Croix skink, [FR Doc. 2016–00157 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am]
listed as endangered or threatened greater Virgin Islands skink, lesser Saint BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
under the Act. The petition clearly Croix skink, Mona skink, narrow-foot
identified itself as such and included diving beetle, Northern Rockies
the requisite identification information population of fisher, Puerto Rico skink,
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR Scott riffle beetle, and Virgin Islands
424.14(a). bronze skink present substantial
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
On March 2, 2015, we received a scientific or commercial information
second petition dated March 2, 2015, indicating that the requested actions
from Mr. James A. Horsley, requesting may be warranted.
that Yellowstone National Park bison be Because we have found that these
listed as endangered or threatened petitions present substantial
under the Act. The petition clearly information indicating that the
identified itself as such and included petitioned actions may be warranted, we
the requisite identification information are initiating status reviews to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Jan 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM 12JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_1375/page/8.svg)
Document Created: 2016-01-12 01:23:15
Document Modified: 2016-01-12 01:23:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Petition findings and initiation of status reviews. | |
| Dates | When we conduct status reviews, we will consider all information that we have received. To ensure that we will have adequate time to consider submitted information during the status reviews, we request that we receive information no later than March 14, 2016. Information submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see | |
| Contact | Common name Contact person | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 1368 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR