81 FR 14806 - Safety Zone; Willamette River, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 53 (March 18, 2016)

Page Range		14806-14808
FR Document		2016-06113

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone for certain waters of the Willamette River in the vicinity of Tom McCall Waterfront Park, Portland, OR. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters for the duration of the marine event on July 10, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14806-14808]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06113]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0163]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Willamette River, Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone for 
certain waters of the Willamette River in the vicinity of Tom McCall 
Waterfront Park, Portland, OR. This action is necessary to provide for 
the safety of life on these navigable waters for the duration of the 
marine event on July 10, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit 
persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a designated 
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before April 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0163 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management 
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-
240-9319, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 22, 2015, the Human Access Project notified the Coast 
Guard that it will be conducting a marine event from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. 
on July 10, 2016, for The Big Float. This event will be a group inner-
tube float of the Willamette River in downtown Portland from the 
Marquam Bridge to Tom McCall Waterfront Park. The Captain of the Port 
Sector Columbia River (COTP) has determined that the potential hazards 
associated with this marine event would be a safety concern for anyone 
transiting between the Hawthorne Bridge and Marquam Bridge. The purpose 
of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of persons, vessels, and the 
navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled event. The 
Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. 
on July 7, 2016. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters 
within a straight line from the Hawthorne Bridge to the Marquam Bridge 
extending approximately 200 yards from the shore east into the 
Willamette River. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the 
safety of event participants, vessels and these navigable waters during 
the event scheduled from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m.. No vessel or person would 
be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from 
the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are 
proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits.

[[Page 14807]]

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both 
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of 
promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a 
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic, 
including passenger vessels and barges, would be able to transit around 
this safety zone which would impact only a small designated area of the 
Willamette River. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the 
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety 
zone that would prohibit entry within 200 yards of the Tom McCall 
Waterfront Park between the Hawthorne Bridge and Marquam Bridge. 
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review 
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all

[[Page 14808]]

public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0163 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-0163  Safety Zone; The Big Float, Willamette River, 
Portland, OR

    (a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a safety zone: 
all navigable waters of the Willamette River, in Portland, Oregon, 
enclosed by the Hawthorne Bridge, the Marquam Bridge, and west of a 
line beginning at the Hawthorne Bridge at approximate location 
45[deg]30'50'' N.; 122[deg]40'21'' W., and running south to the Marquam 
Bridge at approximate location 45[deg] 30'27'' N.; 122[deg]40'11'' W.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section--
    Designated representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, 
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers 
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers 
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia 
River in the enforcement of the regulated area.
    Non-participant persons and vessels means persons and vessels that 
are not participating in the event and are therefore prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector 
Columbia River or a designated representative.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
33 CFR part 165, subpart C, non-participant persons and vessels are 
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or 
remaining within the regulated area identified in paragraph (a) of this 
section unless authorized by Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River 
or a designated representative.
    (2) Non-participant persons and vessels may request authorization 
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated 
area by contacting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a 
designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization 
is granted by the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a 
designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port Sector Columbia River or a designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This safety zone will be enforced for the 
duration of the marine event on July10, 2016.

    Dated: March 10, 2016.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016-06113 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

14806 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Proposed Rules

Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust Ave. Room www.regulations.gov by searching for and (5) The following aircraft service
301, Kansas City, MO; phone: 816–329–4165; locating it in Docket No. FAA–2016–2042. information contains FAA-approved
fax: 816–329–4090; email: Jim.Rutherford@ (4) BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co KG Service procedures for complying with paragraph
faa.gov. Bulletin (SB) SB–912–068/SB–914–049 (one (e)(3) of this AD and can be obtained from
(3) Refer to MCAI European Aviation document), dated April 16, 2015, can be BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co. KG, using the
Safety Agency, AD 2015–0240, dated
December 18, 2015, for more information. obtained from BRP-Powertrain GmbH & Co contact information in paragraph (g)(6) of this
You may examine the MCAI in the AD KG, using the contact information in proposed AD:
docket on the Internet at http:// paragraph (g)(6) of this proposed AD.

FIGURE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (G) OF THIS AD—AIRCRAFT TYPE/MODEL AND SERVICE INFORMATION
Type/model(s) SB

Aquila AT01 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... SB–AT01–029
TECNAM P92, P2002 and P2006T .................................................................................................................................................. SB–183–CS
TECNAM P2008 JC .......................................................................................................................................................................... SB–185–CS
Diamond H 36 ‘‘Dimona’’ and HK 36 ‘‘Super Dimona’’ .................................................................................................................... OSB 36–111
Diamond DV 20 ‘‘Katana’’ ................................................................................................................................................................ OSB 20–066
Diamond (Canada) DA20–A1 ‘‘Katana’’ ........................................................................................................................................... SB Da20–72–04
M&D AVO 68 ‘‘Samburo’’ ................................................................................................................................................................. TM 808–31
Scheibe SF 25 C and SF 36 R ........................................................................................................................................................ SI_02–14

(6) For service information identified in Captain of the Port Sector Columbia associated with this marine event would
this proposed AD, contact BRP-Powertrain River or a designated representative. We be a safety concern for anyone transiting
GmbH & Co. KG, Rotaxstrasse 1, A–4623 invite your comments on this proposed between the Hawthorne Bridge and
Gunskirchen, Austria; phone: +43 7246 6010; rulemaking. Marquam Bridge. The purpose of this
fax: +43 7246 601 9130; email:
airworthiness@brp.com; Internet: www.rotax- DATES: Comments and related material rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
aircraft-engines.com. must be received by the Coast Guard on persons, vessels, and the navigable
(7) You may view this service information or before April 18, 2016. waters before, during, and after the
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, ADDRESSES: You may submit comments scheduled event. The Coast Guard
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For identified by docket number USCG– proposes this rulemaking under
information on the availability of this 2016–0163 using the Federal authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. eRulemaking Portal at http:// III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
March 11, 2016. Participation and Request for The COTP proposes to establish a
Colleen M. D’Alessandro, Comments’’ portion of the safety zone from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
July 7, 2016. The safety zone would
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service. further instructions on submitting cover all navigable waters within a
comments. straight line from the Hawthorne Bridge
[FR Doc. 2016–06118 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am]
to the Marquam Bridge extending
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If approximately 200 yards from the shore
you have questions about this proposed east into the Willamette River. The
rulemaking, call or email Ken duration of the zone is intended to
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Lawrenson, Waterways Management ensure the safety of event participants,
SECURITY Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, vessels and these navigable waters
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240– during the event scheduled from 10 a.m.
Coast Guard 9319, email msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. to 7 p.m.. No vessel or person would be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: permitted to enter the safety zone
33 CFR Part 165 without obtaining permission from the
I. Table of Abbreviations
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0163]
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP or a designated representative.
DHS Department of Homeland Security The regulatory text we are proposing
RIN 1625–AA00
FR Federal Register appears at the end of this document.
Safety Zone; Willamette River, NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
IV. Regulatory Analyses
Portland, OR § Section
U.S.C. United States Code We developed this proposed rule after
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. considering numerous statutes and
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Basis
Below we summarize our analyses
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to On December 22, 2015, the Human based on a number of these statutes and
establish a safety zone for certain waters Access Project notified the Coast Guard Executive orders and we discuss First
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

of the Willamette River in the vicinity that it will be conducting a marine event Amendment rights of protestors.
of Tom McCall Waterfront Park, from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. on July 10, 2016,
Portland, OR. This action is necessary to for The Big Float. This event will be a A. Regulatory Planning and Review
provide for the safety of life on these group inner-tube float of the Willamette Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
navigable waters for the duration of the River in downtown Portland from the direct agencies to assess the costs and
marine event on July 10, 2016. This Marquam Bridge to Tom McCall benefits of available regulatory
proposed rulemaking would prohibit Waterfront Park. The Captain of the Port alternatives and, if regulation is
persons and vessels from being in the Sector Columbia River (COTP) has necessary, to select regulatory
safety zone unless authorized by the determined that the potential hazards approaches that maximize net benefits.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM 18MRP1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Proposed Rules 14807

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the question or complain about this action is one of a category of actions that
importance of quantifying both costs proposed rule or any policy or action of do not individually or cumulatively
and benefits, of reducing costs, of the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
harmonizing rules, and of promoting environment. This proposed rule
C. Collection of Information
flexibility. This NPRM has not been involves a safety zone that would
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory This proposed rule would not call for prohibit entry within 200 yards of the
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. a new collection of information under Tom McCall Waterfront Park between
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the Hawthorne Bridge and Marquam
reviewed by the Office of Management (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Bridge. Normally such actions are
and Budget. D. Federalism and Indian Tribal categorically excluded from further
This regulatory action determination review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
Governments
is based on the size, location, duration, 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
and time-of-day of the safety zone. A rule has implications for federalism M16475.lD. A preliminary
Vessel traffic, including passenger under Executive Order 13132, environmental analysis checklist and
vessels and barges, would be able to Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Categorical Exclusion Determination are
transit around this safety zone which effect on the States, on the relationship available in the docket where indicated
would impact only a small designated between the national government and under ADDRESSES. We seek any
area of the Willamette River. Moreover, the States, or on the distribution of comments or information that may lead
the Coast Guard would issue a power and responsibilities among the to the discovery of a significant
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– various levels of government. We have environmental impact from this
FM marine channel 16 about the zone, analyzed this proposed rule under that proposed rule.
and the rule would allow vessels to seek Order and have determined that it is
permission to enter the zone. consistent with the fundamental G. Protest Activities
federalism principles and preemption The Coast Guard respects the First
B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive Amendment rights of protesters.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132. Protesters are asked to contact the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have person listed in the FOR FURTHER
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive INFORMATION CONTACT section to
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and coordinate protest activities so that your
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal message can be received without
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have jeopardizing the safety or security of
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or people, places, or vessels.
that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and V. Public Participation and Request for
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of Comments
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the We view public participation as
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. essential to effective rulemaking, and
605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has will consider all comments and material
have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian received during the comment period.
a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed Your comment can help shape the
While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION outcome of this rulemaking. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section. submit a comment, please include the
zone may be small entities, for the docket number for this rulemaking,
reasons stated in section IV.A above this E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act indicate the specific section of this
proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act document to which each comment
significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires applies, and provide a reason for each
vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of suggestion or recommendation.
If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In We encourage you to submit
organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions comments through the Federal
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a eRulemaking Portal at http://
and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the www.regulations.gov. If your material
significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of cannot be submitted using http://
please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or www.regulations.gov, contact the person
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such CONTACT section of this document for
this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the alternate instructions.
Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this We accept anonymous comments. All
Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble. comments received will be posted
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), without change to http://
we want to assist small entities in F. Environment www.regulations.gov and will include
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule any personal information you have
rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland provided. For more about privacy and
organization, or governmental Security Management Directive 023–01 the docket, you may review a Privacy
jurisdiction and you have questions and Commandant Instruction Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Management System in the March 24,
compliance, please contact the person Guard in complying with the National 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 FR 15086).
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a Documents mentioned in this NPRM
not retaliate against small entities that preliminary determination that this as being available in the docket, and all

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM 18MRP1

Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:13:52
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:13:52

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before April 18, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503- 240-9319, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 14806
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 14806 - Safety Zone; Willamette River, Portland, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 53 (March 18, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard