81_FR_14876 81 FR 14823 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Understanding the Anti-Fraud Measures of Large SNAP Retailers

81 FR 14823 - Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Understanding the Anti-Fraud Measures of Large SNAP Retailers

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 53 (March 18, 2016)

Page Range14823-14826
FR Document2016-05896

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection. This is a new collection for the purpose of learning about the types of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) related fraud activity observed by large retailers and the methods they use to prevent fraud and minimize their losses. The goal of the information collection is to learn more about the types of SNAP fraud that occur in large retailer settings; document retailer practices to detect, deter, and deal with fraud (collectively known as loss prevention or loss prevention practices); and determine which practices could provide information that would help FNS in detecting and preventing SNAP fraud.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14823-14826]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request--Understanding the Anti-Fraud Measures of Large SNAP 
Retailers

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 
USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) invites the general public and 
other public agencies to comment on this proposed information 
collection. This is a new collection for the purpose of learning about 
the types of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) related 
fraud activity observed by large retailers and the methods they use to 
prevent fraud and minimize their losses. The goal of the information 
collection is to learn more about the types of SNAP fraud that occur in 
large retailer settings; document retailer practices to detect, deter, 
and deal with fraud (collectively known as loss prevention or loss 
prevention practices); and determine which practices could provide 
information that would help FNS in detecting and preventing SNAP fraud.

DATES: Written comments must be received by May 17, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection 
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the time and cost 
burden for this proposed collection, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to 
minimize the reporting burden on those who are asked to respond, 
including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or 
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Comments may be sent to Eric Sean Williams, Food and Nutrition 
Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22312. 
Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of Eric Sean 
Williams at (703) 305-2576 or via email to [email protected].
    Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal. Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments electronically.
    All written comments will be open for public inspection at the 
office of FNS during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., 
Monday through Friday) located at 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22312.
    All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
request for OMB approval. All comments will be a matter of public 
record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of this information collected should be directed to Eric Sean 
Williams, Office of Policy Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Understanding the Anti-Fraud Measures of Large SNAP 
Retailers.
    OMB Number: 0584--NEW.
    Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
    Abstract: FNS is responsible for authorizing retailers for 
participation in SNAP as well as monitoring their compliance with 
applicable regulations. Fraud in the context of SNAP can come from 
client-level program violations or retailer-level fraud. The latter, 
which is the focus of this study, can involve different actions such as 
the buying and selling of benefits or selling ineligible items like 
alcohol and tobacco. FNS believes that any type of fraud in SNAP 
weakens the program by diverting benefits from the intended purpose of 
helping low-income Americans purchase food and undermining the public 
confidence in the program. Thus, the Agency continually seeks new ways 
to detect and prevent fraud.
    Research has consistently demonstrated that fraud rates are lowest 
among large retailers. There are several theories for why this may be 
true, one of which is that large regional or national retail chains of 
stores have sophisticated loss prevention systems that prevent or 
detect numerous types of fraud. Thus, a loss prevention system built to 
discover an employee engaging in credit card fraud could easily be 
modified to detect an employee engaging in SNAP benefit fraud. 
Similarly, a system built to prevent internal theft may be able to 
detect the sale of ineligible items.
    Despite theories as to why large stores have low SNAP fraud rates, 
there is limited understanding of how they prevent SNAP fraud. If 
internal loss prevention systems prevent SNAP fraud, then it is 
possible that a better understanding of large store procedures could 
help FNS refine its procedures for detecting and reducing retailer-
level fraud. Thus, FNS desires to understand more about the steps large 
retailers take to protect themselves from fraud in general and SNAP 
fraud specifically.
    The information collection activities to be undertaken subject to 
this notice include: Survey of Companies that own/franchise large SNAP 
authorized retail chains: Surveys will be administered to company SNAP 
representatives in companies that own, franchise and/or have 
cooperative agreements with the largest chains of SNAP-authorized 
stores. These include super store chains, large supermarket chains, 
convenience store chains, and other chain stores that sell a 
combination of food and other products, such as household products, 
pharmaceuticals, or gasoline. The surveys will address the loss 
prevention systems used by these companies.
    Survey of SNAP Authorized Stores owned/franchised/affiliated with 
large retail chains: Surveys will be administered to managers of super 
stores, large supermarkets, convenience stores and other chain stores 
that sell a combination of food and other products. The surveys will 
address fraud detection and prevention policies and practices.
    This study does not seek to represent all SNAP retailers. It 
targets the practices of one segment of the SNAP authorized retailer 
population--the largest retail chains. These chains are likely to have 
the most sophisticated loss prevention systems. Therefore, the study 
includes the large national and regional chain retailers responsible 
for transacting about half of all SNAP redemptions. A total of the 35 
largest retail corporations and a sample of 2,000 of their store 
outlets are expected to respond to surveys.

[[Page 14824]]

    Company SNAP representatives and store managers will be asked 
questions regarding organizational structure, roles and 
responsibilities, and tactics used to limit or eliminate fraud in 
general and SNAP fraud in particular. At a minimum the following fraud 
abatement methods will be studied at the corporate and store levels: 
Point of sale systems, analytics, training, surveillance, 
investigation, and liaison with law enforcement. The surveys will be 
administered using a web-based survey tool.
    Companies and SNAP authorized stores that do not respond to the 
web-based surveys will receive internet reminders. Those that still do 
not respond will receive a telephone call through a Computer Aided 
Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system where trained interviewers will 
prompt the participant to respond to the survey online or to complete 
the survey by telephone via CATI.
    Affected Public: Businesses-for-and-not-for-profit (4,054):
    A total of 45 large companies with stores participating in SNAP, 
and 4,000 SNAP authorized company owned and operate stores, franchised 
stores or affiliated stores and 5 pretest companies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,054.
    Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 2.4430.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 9,904.
    Estimated Time per Response: 0.11378.
    Pretesting the company surveys will take a total of 10 hours (four 
2.5-hour interviews), and pretesting the store surveys will take 5 
hours (five 1-hour interviews).
    FNS plans to contact 45 companies. We anticipate the SNAP 
representative at 35 companies will respond and spend 1.65 hours 
identifying key informants and compiling information from various 
organizational units involved in SNAP. They are likely to include human 
resources (for training), loss prevention (for loss prevention 
management and loss prevention procedures used), point of sale 
management and analytics. The company SNAP representative will spend 
between .25 (web-based response) to .33 (CATI survey response) hours 
completing the survey, including time to report on SNAP-specific 
activities and policies carried out by the SNAP representative and 
information compiled from other units involved in SNAP. Managers of 
2,000 stores will spend an average of .4 hours each to respond to the 
Store Manager Survey.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,126.9 hours.
    See the burden table below for estimated total burden for each type 
of business respondent and non-respondents.

[[Page 14825]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18MR16.002



[[Page 14826]]


    Dated: March 8, 2016.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05896 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices 14823 the methodology and assumptions used; proposed collection, including the among large retailers. There are several (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, validity of the methodology and theories for why this may be true, one and clarity of the information collected; assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance of which is that large regional or and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the quality, utility, and clarity of the national retail chains of stores have the collection of information on those information to be collected; (d) ways to sophisticated loss prevention systems who respond, including through the use minimize the reporting burden on those that prevent or detect numerous types of of appropriate automated, electronic, who are asked to respond, including the fraud. Thus, a loss prevention system mechanical, or other technological use of appropriate automated, built to discover an employee engaging collection techniques or other forms of electronic, mechanical, or other in credit card fraud could easily be information technology. technological collection techniques or modified to detect an employee All responses to this notice will be other forms of information technology. engaging in SNAP benefit fraud. summarized and included in the request Comments may be sent to Eric Sean Similarly, a system built to prevent for OMB approval. All comments will Williams, Food and Nutrition Service, internal theft may be able to detect the become a matter of public record. USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room sale of ineligible items. Dated: March 15, 2016. 1014, Alexandria, VA 22312. Comments Despite theories as to why large stores Elanor Starmer, may also be submitted via fax to the have low SNAP fraud rates, there is Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing attention of Eric Sean Williams at (703) limited understanding of how they Service. 305–2576 or via email to Eric.Williams@ prevent SNAP fraud. If internal loss [FR Doc. 2016–06144 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am] fns.usda.gov. prevention systems prevent SNAP BILLING CODE P Comments will also be accepted fraud, then it is possible that a better through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. understanding of large store procedures Go to http://www.regulations.gov and could help FNS refine its procedures for DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE follow the online instructions for detecting and reducing retailer-level submitting comments electronically. fraud. Thus, FNS desires to understand Food and Nutrition Service All written comments will be open for more about the steps large retailers take public inspection at the office of FNS to protect themselves from fraud in Agency Information Collection during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. general and SNAP fraud specifically. Activities: Proposed Collection; to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) The information collection activities Comment Request—Understanding the located at 3101 Park Center Drive, Room to be undertaken subject to this notice Anti-Fraud Measures of Large SNAP 1014, Alexandria, Virginia 22312. include: Survey of Companies that own/ Retailers All responses to this notice will be franchise large SNAP authorized retail AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service summarized and included in the request chains: Surveys will be administered to (FNS), USDA. for OMB approval. All comments will company SNAP representatives in ACTION: Notice. be a matter of public record. companies that own, franchise and/or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: have cooperative agreements with the SUMMARY: In accordance with the Requests for additional information or largest chains of SNAP-authorized Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the copies of this information collected stores. These include super store chains, USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) should be directed to Eric Sean large supermarket chains, convenience invites the general public and other Williams, Office of Policy Support, store chains, and other chain stores that public agencies to comment on this Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, sell a combination of food and other proposed information collection. This is 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, products, such as household products, a new collection for the purpose of Alexandria, VA 22302. pharmaceuticals, or gasoline. The learning about the types of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: surveys will address the loss prevention Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Title: Understanding the Anti-Fraud systems used by these companies. Program (SNAP) related fraud activity Measures of Large SNAP Retailers. Survey of SNAP Authorized Stores observed by large retailers and the OMB Number: 0584—NEW. owned/franchised/affiliated with large methods they use to prevent fraud and Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined. retail chains: Surveys will be minimize their losses. The goal of the Abstract: FNS is responsible for administered to managers of super information collection is to learn more authorizing retailers for participation in stores, large supermarkets, convenience about the types of SNAP fraud that SNAP as well as monitoring their stores and other chain stores that sell a occur in large retailer settings; compliance with applicable regulations. combination of food and other products. document retailer practices to detect, Fraud in the context of SNAP can come The surveys will address fraud deter, and deal with fraud (collectively from client-level program violations or detection and prevention policies and known as loss prevention or loss retailer-level fraud. The latter, which is practices. prevention practices); and determine the focus of this study, can involve This study does not seek to represent which practices could provide different actions such as the buying and all SNAP retailers. It targets the information that would help FNS in selling of benefits or selling ineligible practices of one segment of the SNAP detecting and preventing SNAP fraud. items like alcohol and tobacco. FNS authorized retailer population—the DATES: Written comments must be believes that any type of fraud in SNAP largest retail chains. These chains are received by May 17, 2016. weakens the program by diverting likely to have the most sophisticated asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: benefits from the intended purpose of loss prevention systems. Therefore, the (a) Whether the proposed collection of helping low-income Americans study includes the large national and information is necessary for the proper purchase food and undermining the regional chain retailers responsible for performance of the functions of the public confidence in the program. Thus, transacting about half of all SNAP agency, including whether the the Agency continually seeks new ways redemptions. A total of the 35 largest information shall have practical utility; to detect and prevent fraud. retail corporations and a sample of (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate Research has consistently 2,000 of their store outlets are expected of the time and cost burden for this demonstrated that fraud rates are lowest to respond to surveys. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:50 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1

14824 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices Company SNAP representatives and Affected Public: Businesses-for-and- and compiling information from various store managers will be asked questions not-for-profit (4,054): organizational units involved in SNAP. regarding organizational structure, roles A total of 45 large companies with They are likely to include human and responsibilities, and tactics used to stores participating in SNAP, and 4,000 resources (for training), loss prevention limit or eliminate fraud in general and SNAP authorized company owned and (for loss prevention management and SNAP fraud in particular. At a operate stores, franchised stores or loss prevention procedures used), point minimum the following fraud abatement affiliated stores and 5 pretest of sale management and analytics. The methods will be studied at the corporate companies. company SNAP representative will and store levels: Point of sale systems, Estimated Number of Respondents: spend between .25 (web-based response) analytics, training, surveillance, 4,054. to .33 (CATI survey response) hours investigation, and liaison with law Estimated Number of Responses per completing the survey, including time enforcement. The surveys will be Respondent: 2.4430. to report on SNAP-specific activities administered using a web-based survey Estimated Number of Annual and policies carried out by the SNAP tool. Responses: 9,904. representative and information Companies and SNAP authorized Estimated Time per Response: compiled from other units involved in stores that do not respond to the web- 0.11378. SNAP. Managers of 2,000 stores will based surveys will receive internet Pretesting the company surveys will spend an average of .4 hours each to reminders. Those that still do not take a total of 10 hours (four 2.5-hour respond to the Store Manager Survey. respond will receive a telephone call interviews), and pretesting the store through a Computer Aided Telephone surveys will take 5 hours (five 1-hour Estimated Total Annual Burden on Interviewing (CATI) system where interviews). Respondents: 1,126.9 hours. trained interviewers will prompt the FNS plans to contact 45 companies. See the burden table below for participant to respond to the survey We anticipate the SNAP representative estimated total burden for each type of online or to complete the survey by at 35 companies will respond and spend business respondent and non- telephone via CATI. 1.65 hours identifying key informants respondents. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:50 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1

Estimated Sample Size and Response Burden Grand Responses Non—Responses Total u 2 — 5 — g c 5 5 ~ 5 ‘E 3 s 3 8 3 . a $ 2 y 5 g§ 5t £ 5 u 4, & a 2 5 £ 5 5 & 5 2 & § Grand wo oS5 s § m5 $5 5o 3B5 & 2o $C so 2o m§ 2e 58 § $5 oc§ Total sample €& &§ &a &§ °& 2§ g °5 |#5 |E¢€ |6% 55 4& Z2$ Burden ® C 2 C saonoN/9I0Z ‘g1 YoJrep| ‘AepWU4/£S ‘ON ‘IG OA /JajstSay Jfe1apaq Affected Public Respondent (Appendix) Size 2 a 2 & & a 2 a 2 2 & Hours Company—Pretest 4 4 1 4 2.5 10.00 0 1 0 0 0 10.00 Company—Invitation Email 45 35 1 35 0.06 2.10 10 1 10 0.02 0.2 2.30 Company—Reminder Email 40 30 1 30 0.03 0.90 10 1 10 0.01 0.1 1.00 Company—Reminder Telephone Call 30 20 1 20 0.06 1.20 10 1 10 0.01 0.1 1.30 Company—Compile Information on Organization and Mgmt. 35 35 1 35 0.5 17.50 0 1 0 0 0 17.50 Company—Compile Information on Training 35 35 1 35 0.2 7.00 0 1 0 0 0 7.00 Company—Compile Information on Surveillance Systems 35 35 1 35 0.15 5.25 0 1 0 0 0 5.25 Company—Compile Information on Investigation 35 35 1 35 0.15 5.25 0 1 0 0 0 5.25 Company—Compile Information Profit/Nonprof on Liaison with Law it Businesses: Enforcement 35 35 1 35 0.15 5.25 0 1 0 0 0 5.25 Retailers— Company— Compile Information large food on Point of Sale Systems 35 35 1 35 0.25 8.75 0 1 0 0 0 8.75 retail chains Company—Compile Information on Analytics 35 35 1 35 0.25 8.75 0 1 0 0 0 8.75 Company—Input Data via Web— based Survey 25 25 1 25 0.25 6.25 0 1 0 0 0 6.25 Company—Respond via Computer—Assisted Telephone Interview Survey 10 10 1 10 0.33 3.30 0 1 0 0 0 3.30 Store—Pretest 5 5 1 5 1 5.00 0 1 0 0 0 5.00 Store—Invitation Email 4000 2000 1 2000 0.06 120.00 2000 1 2000 0.02 40 160.00 Store—Reminder Email 2500 1000 1 1000 0.03 30.00 1500 1 1500 0.01 15 45.00 Store—Reminder Telephone Call 1000 500 1 500 0.06 30.00 500 1 500 0.01 5 35.00 Store—Respond via Web—based Survey 1500 1500 1 1500 0.4 600.00 0 1 0 0 0 600.00 Store—Respond via Computer— Assisted Telephone Interview 500 500 1 500 0.4 200.00 0 1 0 0 0 200.00 Se8PHL

14826 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2016 / Notices Dated: March 8, 2016. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Section 246.7(d)(1) of the WIC Audrey Rowe, regulations (Title 7, Code of Federal This notice does not contain reporting Regulations) specifies that State Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. or recordkeeping requirements subject agencies may prescribe income [FR Doc. 2016–05896 Filed 3–17–16; 8:45 am] to approval by the Office of guidelines either equaling the income BILLING CODE 3410–30–P Management and Budget in accordance guidelines established under section 9 with the Paperwork Reduction Act of of the Richard B. Russell National 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). School Lunch Act for reduced-price DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Executive Order 12372 school meals, or identical to State or Food and Nutrition Service local guidelines for free or reduced- This program is listed in the Catalog price health care. However, in Special Supplemental Nutrition of Federal Domestic Assistance conforming WIC income guidelines to Program for Women, Infants and Programs under No. 10.557, and is State or local health care guidelines, the Children (WIC): 2016/2017 Income subject to the provisions of Executive State cannot establish WIC guidelines Eligibility Guidelines Order 12372, which requires which exceed the guidelines for intergovernmental consultation with reduced-price school meals, or which AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service State and local officials (7 CFR part are less than 100 percent of the Federal (FNS), USDA. 3015, subpart V, 48 FR 29100, June 24, poverty guidelines. Consistent with the ACTION: Notice. 1983, and 49 FR 22675, May 31, 1984). method used to compute income SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Description eligibility guidelines for reduced-price Agriculture (‘‘Department’’) announces meals under the National School Lunch adjusted income eligibility guidelines to Section 17(d)(2)(A) of the Child Program, the poverty guidelines were be used by State agencies in Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended (42 multiplied by 1.85 and the results determining the income eligibility of U.S.C. 1786(d)(2)(A)), requires the rounded upward to the next whole persons applying to participate in the Secretary of Agriculture to establish dollar. Special Supplemental Nutrition income criteria to be used with At this time, the Department is Program for Women, Infants and nutritional risk criteria in determining a publishing the maximum and minimum Children Program (WIC). These income person’s eligibility for participation in WIC income eligibility guidelines by eligibility guidelines are to be used in the WIC Program. The law provides that household size for the period of July 1, conjunction with the WIC Regulations. persons will be income-eligible for the 2016 through June 30, 2017. Consistent DATES: Effective date July 1, 2016. WIC Program only if they are members with section 17(f)(17) of the Child FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of families that satisfy the income Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended (42 Kurtria Watson, Chief, Policy Branch, standard prescribed for reduced-price U.S.C. 1786(f)(17)), a State agency may Supplemental Food Programs Division, school meals under section 9(b) of the implement the revised WIC income FNS, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Richard B. Russell National School eligibility guidelines concurrently with Alexandria, Virginia 22302, (703) 605– Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(b)). Under the implementation of income eligibility 4387. section 9(b), the income limit for guidelines under the Medicaid Program reduced-price school meals is 185 established under Title XIX of the Social SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: percent of the Federal poverty Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396, et seq.). Executive Order 12866 guidelines, as adjusted. State agencies may coordinate This notice is exempt from review by Section 9(b) also requires that these implementation with the revised the Office of Management and Budget guidelines be revised annually to reflect Medicaid guidelines, i.e., earlier in the under Executive Order 12866. changes in the Consumer Price Index. year, but in no case may The annual revision for 2016/2017 was implementation take place later than Regulatory Flexibility Act published by the Department of Health July 1, 2016. State agencies that do not This action is not a rule as defined by and Human Services (HHS) at 81 FR coordinate implementation with the the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 4036, January 25, 2016. The guidelines revised Medicaid guidelines must 601–612) and thus is exempt from the published by HHS are referred to as the implement the WIC income eligibility provisions of this Act. ‘‘poverty guidelines.’’ guidelines on or before July 1, 2016. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:50 Mar 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1


Document Created: 2018-02-02 15:13:52
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 15:13:52
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
DatesWritten comments must be received by May 17, 2016.
ContactRequests for additional information or copies of this information collected should be directed to Eric Sean Williams, Office of Policy Support, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302.
FR Citation81 FR 14823 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR