81 FR 17435 - Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 60 (March 29, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 60 (March 29, 2016)
| Page Range | 17435-17438 | |
| FR Document | 2016-07072 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 17435-17438] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-07072] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-552-801] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the 11th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets (``fish fillets'') from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (``Vietnam'') on September 14, 2015.\1\ We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments and information received, we made changes to the margin calculations for these final results. The final dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Results of the Administrative Review'' section of this notice. The period of review (``POR'') is August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 55092 (September 14, 2015) (``Preliminary Results'') and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (``Preliminary Decision Memo''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective March 29, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-0413 or 202-482-2243, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the Preliminary Results on September 14, 2015.\2\ The Department conducted a verification of Thuan An Production Trading and Service Co., Ltd. (``Tafishco'') and its tollers between September 21, 2015, through October 6, 2015.\3\ The Department also conducted a verification of the Hung Vuong Group\4\ (``HVG'') between November 10, 2015, through November 24, 2015.\5\ On January 11, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the final results to March 14, 2016.\6\ As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government.\7\ All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the final results of this administrative review is now March 18, 2016. Between February 11 and February 22, 2016, interested parties submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On March 3, 2016, the Department held a closed hearing and a public hearing limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Preliminary Results. \3\ See Memorandum to the File, from Jerry Huang, International Trade Analyst, Office V, and Javier Barrientos, International Trade Analyst, Office V, ``Verification of the Sales and Factors of Production Responses of Thuan An Production Trading and Service Co., Ltd. in the 2013-2014 Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated February 2, 2016. \4\ The Hung Vuong Group includes: An Giang Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Company, Asia Pangasius Company Limited (``Asia Pangasius''), Europe Joint Stock Company, Hung Vuong Joint Stock Company, Hung Vuong Mascato Company Limited, Hung Vuong--Vinh Long Co., Ltd., and Hung Vuong--Sa Dec Co., Ltd. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011- 2012, 79 FR 19053 (April 7, 2014) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 3. \5\ See Memorandum to the File, from Javier Barrientos, International Trade Analyst, Office V, and Kenneth Hawkins, International Trade Analyst, Office V, ``Verification of the Sales and Factors of Production Responses of Agifish and HVG in the 2013- 2014 Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated February 5, 2016. \6\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations from Jerry Huang, International Trade Analyst, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated January 11, 2016. \7\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is frozen fish fillets, including regular, shank, and strip fillets and portions thereof, whether or not breaded or marinated, of the species Pangasius Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus (also known as Pangasius Pangasius) and Pangasius Micronemus. These products are classifiable under tariff article code 0304.62.0020 (Frozen Fish Fillets of the species Pangasius, including basa and tra), and may enter under tariff article codes 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').\8\ Although [[Page 17436]] the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ Until June 30, 2004 these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6030, 0304.20.6096, 0304.20.6043 and 0304.20.6057. From July 1, 2004 until December 31, 2006 these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6033. From January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2011 these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.29.6033. On March 2, 2011 the Department added two HTSUS numbers at the request of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') that the subject merchandise may enter under: 1604.19.2000 and 1604 19.3000, which were changed to 1604.19.2100 and 1604.19.3100 on January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012 the Department added the following HTSUS numbers at the request of CBP: 0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100. \9\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 11th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014,'' at 2-3 (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we revised the margin calculations for HVG and Tafishco. The Surrogate Values Memo contains further explanation of our changes to the surrogate values selected for HVG's and Tafishco's factors of production.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Memorandum to the File, through Paul Walker, Program Manager, from Javier Barrientos, Case Analyst, ``Eleventh Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Surrogate Values for the Final Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined that An Giang Agriculture and Food Import-Export Joint Stock Company, Asia Commerce Fisheries Joint Stock Company, Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company, Dai Thanh Seafoods Company Limited, Fatifish Company Limited, Golden Quality Seafood Corporation, Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Company, Hoa Phat Seafood Import-Export and Processing JSC, Ngoc Ha Co., Ltd. Food Processing and Trading, Quang Minh Seafood Company, Limited, QVD Food Company (``QVD''),\11\ Ltd., Saigon-Mekong Fishery Co., Ltd., Southern Fisheries Industries Company, Ltd., TG Fishery Holdings Corporation, and To Chau Joint Stock Company (collectively ``No Shipment Companies'') did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\12\ Consistent with the Department's refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases, we completed the review with respect to the above-named companies.\13\ Based on the certifications submitted by No Shipment Companies, we continue to determine that these companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. As noted in the ``Assessment Rates'' section below, the Department intends to issue appropriate instructions to CBP for the above-named companies based on the final results of the review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ This rate is also applicable to QVD Dong Thap Food Co., Ltd. (``QVD Dong Thap'') and Thuan Hung Co., Ltd. (``Thufico''). In the second review of this order, the Department found QVD, QVD Dong Thap and Thufico to be a single entity and, because there have been no changes to this determination since that administrative review, we continue to find these companies to be part of a single entity. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 53387 (September 11, 2006). \12\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 55093. \13\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-65695 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vietnam-Wide Entity We noted in the Preliminary Results that a review was requested, but not rescinded, for Asia Pangasius, Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. (``Nam Phuong''), NTACO Corporation (``NTACO''), Thien Ma Seafood Co., Ltd. (``Thien Ma''), and Thufico.\14\ As noted below, and consistent with Comment VII of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department is rescinding this review with respect to NTACO and Nam Phuong. Consistent with Comment IV of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department finds that Asia Pangasius is a part of HVG, and is eligible for a separate rate. Consistent with Comment V of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, and as noted above, the Department finds that Thufico is a part of QVD, and made no shipments during the POR. As a result of these decisions, we no longer find that Asia Pangasius, Nam Phuong, NTACO and Thufico are a part of the Vietnam-wide entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 58729 (September 30, 2014); Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 55093. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with Comment III of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we find that two of Tafishco's uncooperative tollers are a part of the Vietnam-wide entity. Consistent with Comment VI of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we find that Caseamex is not entitled to a separate rate. Moreover, Thien Ma did not submit completed a separate rate application or certification. Accordingly, for the final results, the Department finds that Tafishco's uncooperative tollers, Caseamex, and Thien Ma are a part of the Vietnam-wide entity. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(j), and in accordance with our decision in Comment VII of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department is rescinding this review with respect to NTACO and Nam Phuong. Final Results of the Review The dumping margins for the final results of this administrative review are as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ In the third administrative review of this order, the Department determined that it would calculate per-unit assessment and cash deposit rates for all future reviews. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission, 73 FR 15479 (March 24, 2008). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter margin (dollars/ kilogram) \15\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hung Vuong Group................................... 0.41 Thuan An Production Trading and Services Co., Ltd.. 0.97 Basa Joint Stock Company........................... 0.69 [[Page 17437]] Cadovimex II Seafood Import-Export and Processing 0.69 Joint Stock Company............................... Cafatex Corporation................................ 0.69 C.P. Vietnam Corporation........................... 0.69 Cuu Long Fish Joint Stock Company.................. 0.69 East Sea Seafoods LLC.............................. 0.69 GODACO Seafood Joint Stock Company................. 0.69 Green Farms Seafood Joint Stock Company............ 0.69 Hoang Long Seafood Processing Company Limited...... 0.69 Nam Viet Corporation............................... 0.69 NTSF Seafoods Joint Stock Company.................. 0.69 Seafood Joint Stock Company No. 4--Branch Dong Tam 0.69 Fisheries Processing Company...................... Viet Phu Foods and Fish Corporation................ 0.69 Vinh Quang Fisheries Joint-Stock Company........... 0.69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure The Department will disclose calculations performed for these final results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with section 351.224(b) of the Department's regulations. Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this administrative review. For assessment purposes, we calculated importer (or customer)- specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review. We will continue to direct CBP to assess importer specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit (i.e., per kg) rates by the weight in kgs of each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. Specifically, we calculated importer specific duty assessment rates on a per-unit rate basis by dividing the total dumping margins (calculated as the difference between normal value and export price, or constructed export price) for each importer by the total sales quantity of subject merchandise sold to that importer during the POR. If an importer (or customer)-specific assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to assess that importer (or customer's) entries of subject merchandise without regard to antidumping duties, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). The Department determines that No Shipment Companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. As a result, any suspended entries that entered under these exporter's case numbers (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the Vietnam-wide rate.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011); see also Preliminary Decision Memo at 4-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a zero cash deposit rate will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter- specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Vietnamese exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the Vietnam-wide rate of $2.39 per kg; and (4) for all non-Vietnamese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Vietnamese exporters that supplied that non-Vietnamese exporter. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these administrative reviews and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: March 18, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum Comment I Application of Facts Available to HVG and Tafishco Comment II Application of Facts Available to HVG's Farming Factors Comment III Application of Adverse Facts Available to Certain Tafishco's Tollers Comment IV Assignment of Vietnam-wide Rate to Asia Pangasius and HVG Comment V Assignment of Vietnam-wide Rate to QVD Food Company Ltd. Comment VI Assignment of Vietnam-wide Rate to Can Tho Import-Export Joint Stock Company [[Page 17438]] Comment VII Rescission of Review with Respect to NTACO Corporation and Nam Phuong Seafood Company Ltd. Comment VIII Combination Rates Comment IX Surrogate Value for Fish Feed Comment X Surrogate Value for Fingerlings Comment XI Surrogate Value for Water Comment XII Application of Marine Insurance Comment XIII Packing A. Packing Type Should Not be a Physical Characteristic B. Tafishco's Packing Materials Factors of Production Usage Rates C. Surrogate Value for Strap D. Surrogate Value for Tape Comment XIV By-Products A. Whether to Value Certain By-products B. Surrogate Value for Fish Waste Comment XV Customs Instructions [FR Doc. 2016-07072 Filed 3-28-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Notices 17435
Agency: Bureau of Industry and Socialist Republic of Vietnam January 11, 2016, the Department
Security. (‘‘Vietnam’’) on September 14, 2015.1 extended the deadline for the final
Title: National Security and Critical We gave interested parties an results to March 14, 2016.6 As explained
Technology Assessments of the U.S. opportunity to comment on the in the memorandum from the Acting
Industrial Base. Preliminary Results. Based upon our Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Form Number(s): N/A. analysis of the comments and Compliance, the Department has
OMB Control Number: 0694–0119. information received, we made changes exercised its discretion to toll all
Type of Request: Regular. to the margin calculations for these final administrative deadlines due to the
Burden Hours: 308,000 hours. results. The final dumping margins are recent closure of the Federal
Number of Respondents: 28,000 listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the Government.7 All deadlines in this
respondents. Administrative Review’’ section of this segment of the proceeding have been
Average Hours per Response: 8 to 14 notice. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is extended by four business days. The
hours per response. August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. revised deadline for the final results of
Needs and Uses: The Department of DATES: Effective March 29, 2016. this administrative review is now March
Commerce, in coordination with the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 18, 2016. Between February 11 and
Department of Defense and other Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD February 22, 2016, interested parties
Federal agencies, conducts survey Operations, Office V, Enforcement and submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On
assessments of U.S. industrial base Compliance, International Trade March 3, 2016, the Department held a
sectors deemed critical to U.S. national Administration, U.S. Department of closed hearing and a public hearing
security. The information gathered is Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution limited to issues raised in the case and
necessary to determine the health and Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; rebuttal briefs.
competitiveness as well as the needs of telephone 202–482–0413 or 202–482–
these critical market segments in order Scope of the Order
2243, respectively.
to maintain a strong U.S. industrial SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The product covered by the order is
base. frozen fish fillets, including regular,
Affected Public: Businesses and other Background
shank, and strip fillets and portions
for-profit institutions. The Department published the thereof, whether or not breaded or
Frequency: On occasion. Preliminary Results on September 14, marinated, of the species Pangasius
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 2015.2 The Department conducted a Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus
This information collection request verification of Thuan An Production (also known as Pangasius Pangasius)
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. Trading and Service Co., Ltd. and Pangasius Micronemus. These
Follow the instructions to view the (‘‘Tafishco’’) and its tollers between products are classifiable under tariff
Department of Commerce collections September 21, 2015, through October 6, article code 0304.62.0020 (Frozen Fish
currently under review by OMB. 2015.3 The Department also conducted Fillets of the species Pangasius,
Written comments and a verification of the Hung Vuong Group4 including basa and tra), and may enter
recommendations for the proposed (‘‘HVG’’) between November 10, 2015, under tariff article codes 0305.59.0000,
information collection should be sent through November 24, 2015.5 On 1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3100,
within 30 days of publication of this 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100,
notice to OIRA Submission@ 1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist
1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100 of the
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Dated: March 23, 2016. Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 55092 United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).8 Although
(September 14, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’) and
Glenna Mickelson, accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 6 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memo’’).
Information Officer. 2 See Preliminary Results. Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
3 See Memorandum to the File, from Jerry Huang,
Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C.
[FR Doc. 2016–06985 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am] Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and
International Trade Analyst, Office V, and Javier
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P Countervailing Duty Operations from Jerry Huang,
Barrientos, International Trade Analyst, Office V,
International Trade Analyst, Office V, Antidumping
‘‘Verification of the Sales and Factors of Production
and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain
Responses of Thuan An Production Trading and
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Service Co., Ltd. in the 2013–2014 Administrative
Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated February 2, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
International Trade Administration 2016. January 11, 2016.
7 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
[A–552–801]
4 The Hung Vuong Group includes: An Giang
Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Company, Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement &
Asia Pangasius Company Limited (‘‘Asia Compliance, ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Pangasius’’), Europe Joint Stock Company, Hung As a Result of the Government Closure During
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Vuong Joint Stock Company, Hung Vuong Mascato Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016.
Results and Partial Rescission of Company Limited, Hung Vuong—Vinh Long Co., 8 Until June 30, 2004 these products were
classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6030,
Antidumping Duty Administrative Ltd., and Hung Vuong—Sa Dec Co., Ltd. See Certain
Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 0304.20.6096, 0304.20.6043 and 0304.20.6057.
Review; 2013–2014 Vietnam: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty From July 1, 2004 until December 31, 2006 these
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; products were classifiable under HTSUS
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 2011–2012, 79 FR 19053 (April 7, 2014) and 0304.20.6033. From January 1, 2007 until December
International Trade Administration, accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 31, 2011 these products were classifiable under
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Department of Commerce. 3. HTSUS 0304.29.6033. On March 2, 2011 the
5 See Memorandum to the File, from Javier Department added two HTSUS numbers at the
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Barrientos, International Trade Analyst, Office V, request of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘the Department’’) published the and Kenneth Hawkins, International Trade Analyst, (‘‘CBP’’) that the subject merchandise may enter
Preliminary Results of the 11th Office V, ‘‘Verification of the Sales and Factors of under: 1604.19.2000 and 1604 19.3000, which were
Production Responses of Agifish and HVG in the changed to 1604.19.2100 and 1604.19.3100 on
administrative review of the 2013–2014 Administrative Review of Certain January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012 the Department
antidumping duty order on certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of added the following HTSUS numbers at the request
frozen fish fillets (‘‘fish fillets’’) from the Vietnam,’’ dated February 5, 2016. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Mar 28, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_17495/page/1.svg)
![17438 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2016 / Notices
Comment VII Rescission of Review with public repositories listed at http://www. comment. Additionally, the Trustees
Respect to NTACO Corporation and Nam gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov. solicited public input through a variety
Phuong Seafood Company Ltd.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of mechanisms, including electronic
Comment VIII Combination Rates communications, Trustee Council and
Comment IX Surrogate Value for Fish Feed Courtney Groeneveld at gulfspill.
Comment X Surrogate Value for Fingerlings restoration@noaa.gov, mail to: individual Trustee public Web sites,
Comment XI Surrogate Value for Water fw4coastalDERPcomments@fws.gov. and a public comment portal for public
Comment XII Application of Marine SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
comment collection. The Trustees
Insurance prepared the Final PDARP/PEIS in
Comment XIII Packing Background consideration of the public comments
A. Packing Type Should Not be a Physical received and included a summary of the
On February 17, 2011, the Trustees
Characteristic comments and responses in the Final
B. Tafishco’s Packing Materials Factors of initiated a 90-day formal scoping and
public comment period for the Draft PDARP/PEIS.
Production Usage Rates A Notice of Availability of the Final
C. Surrogate Value for Strap PDARP/PEIS (76 FR 9327) through a
PDARP/PEIS was published in the
D. Surrogate Value for Tape Notice of Intent (NOI) to Begin
Federal Register on February 19, 2016
Comment XIV By-Products Restoration Scoping and Prepare a Gulf
A. Whether to Value Certain By-products (81 FR 8483). In the Final PDARP/PEIS,
Spill Restoration Planning PEIS. The
B. Surrogate Value for Fish Waste the Deepwater Horizon Trustees
Trustees conducted the scoping in
Comment XV Customs Instructions presented their findings on the
accordance with OPA (15 CFR
[FR Doc. 2016–07072 Filed 3–28–16; 8:45 am] extensive injuries to multiple habitats,
990.14(d)), NEPA (40 CFR 1501.7), and
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P biological species, ecological functions,
State authorities. That NOI requested
and geographic regions across the
public input to identify and evaluate a
northern Gulf of Mexico that occurred
range of restoration types that could be
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE as a result of the Deepwater Horizon
used to fully compensate the public for incident, as well as their programmatic
National Oceanic and Atmospheric the environmental and recreational use plan, including funding allocations, for
Administration damages caused by the spill, as well as restoring those resources and the
develop procedures to select and services they provide. The Final
RIN 0648–XE201 implement restoration projects that will PDARP/PEIS describes the framework
compensate the public for the natural
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater by which subsequent project specific
resource damages caused by the spill.
Horizon Oil Spill Record of Decision restoration plans will be developed.
As part of the scoping process, the
(ROD) for the Final Programmatic As documented in the Record of
Trustees hosted public meetings across
Damage Assessment and Restoration Decision (ROD) signed on March 22,
all the Gulf States during Spring 2011. 2016, the Trustees have: Determined the
Plan and Final Programmatic
A Notice of Availability of the Draft extent of injury to natural resources and
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
PDARP/PEIS was published in the services caused by the Deepwater
PDARP/PEIS)
Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80 Horizon oil spill incident; analyzed
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries FR 60126). The Draft PDARP/PEIS alternatives to restore those injuries;
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and presented the assessment of impacts of considered environmental impacts
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Deepwater Horizon incident on associated with the restoration
Commerce. natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico alternatives, including the extent to
ACTION: Notice of availability of a and on the services those resources which any adverse impacts could be
Record of Decision. provide, and determined the restoration mitigated; considered public and agency
needed to compensate the public for comments; considered the funding
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil these impacts. The Draft PDARP/PEIS allocations required for restoration; and
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the presented four programmatic developed a governance approach for
National Environmental Policy Act alternatives evaluated in accordance implementing restoration. Based on
(NEPA), notice is hereby given that the with OPA and NEPA: these considerations and the
Deepwater Horizon Federal and State • Alternative A (Preferred determination of injury, the ROD
natural resource trustee agencies Alternative): Comprehensive Integrated presents the Trustees’ decision to select
(Trustees) have issued a Record of Ecosystem Restoration Plan based on their Preferred Alternative, Alternative
Decision (ROD) for the Final programmatic Trustee goals; A: Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem
Programmatic Damage Assessment and • Alternative B: Resource-Specific Restoration and the associated funding
Restoration Plan and Final Restoration Plan based on programmatic allocation, for implementation. The
Programmatic Environmental Impact Trustee goals; Trustees also conclude that all
Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS). Based • Alternative C: Continued Injury practicable means to avoid, minimize,
on the Trustees’ injury determination Assessment and Defer Comprehensive or compensate for environmental harm
established in the Final PDARP/PEIS, Restoration Plan; and from the action have been considered
the ROD sets forth the basis for the • Alternative D: No Action/Natural programmatically in the PDARP/PEIS,
Trustees’ decision to select Alternative Recovery. and that project-specific measures will
A: Comprehensive Integrated Ecosystem The Trustees provided the public be adopted at a later date during
Alternative. The Trustees’ selection of with 60 days to review and comment on subsequent restoration planning.
this alternative includes the funding
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Draft PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees The Trustees considered this
allocations established in the Final held public meetings in Houma, LA; programmatic restoration planning
PDARP/PEIS. Long Beach, MS; New Orleans, LA; decision in light of the proposed
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You Mobile, AL; Pensacola, FL; St. settlement among BP, the United States,
may download the ROD at http://www. Petersburg, FL; Galveston, TX; and and the States of Louisiana, Mississippi,
gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov or http:// Washington, DC, to facilitate public Alabama, Florida, and Texas to resolve
www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon. You understanding of the document and BP’s liability for natural resource
may also view the ROD at any of the provide opportunity for public damages associated with the Deepwater
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:43 Mar 28, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM 29MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_17495/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-03-30 08:28:57
Document Modified: 2016-03-30 08:28:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective March 29, 2016. | |
| Contact | Paul Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-0413 or 202-482-2243, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 17435 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR