81_FR_18757 81 FR 18695 - Rules of Practice and Procedure

81 FR 18695 - Rules of Practice and Procedure

UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 62 (March 31, 2016)

Page Range18695-18699
FR Document2016-07264

This notice sets forth proposed amendments to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission invites public comment on these proposed amendments.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18695-18699]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07264]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION


Rules of Practice and Procedure

AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments to the Sentencing Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth proposed amendments to the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission invites public comment 
on these proposed amendments.

DATES: Public comment should be received by the Commission not later 
than June 1, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Public comment should be sent to the Commission by 
electronic mail or regular mail. The email address for public comment 
is [email protected]. The regular mail address for public comment 
is United States Sentencing Commission, One Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 
2-500, Washington, DC 20002-8002, Attention: Public Affairs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Osterrieder, Legislative 
Specialist, (202) 502-4500, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is 
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States 
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy 
statements for federal courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The 
Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously promulgated 
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) and submits guideline 
amendments to the Congress not later than the first day of May each 
year pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(p).
    Section 995(a)(1) of title 28, United States Code, authorizes the 
Commission to establish general policies and promulgate rules and 
regulations as necessary for the Commission to carry out the purposes 
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The Commission originally adopted 
the Rules of Practice and Procedure in July 1997 and now proposes to 
make amendments to these rules. In accordance with Rule 1.2 of its 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission hereby invites the 
public to provide comment on the proposed amendments.
    Bracketed text within a proposed amendment indicates a heightened 
interest on the Commission's part in comment and suggestions on whether 
the proposed provision is appropriate.

    Authority:  28 U.S.C. 995(a)(1); USSC Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, Rule 1.2.

Patti B. Saris,
Chair.

1. Rules of Practice and Procedure

    Synopsis of Proposed Amendment: This proposed amendment revises the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The rules were issued in 
1997 ``for the purpose of more fully informing interested persons of 
opportunities and procedures for becoming aware of and participating in 
the public business of the Commission.'' See Rule 1.1 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Commission is 
conducting a review of its rules to determine whether any updates or 
revisions are appropriate, such as to reflect current technologies, 
take into account practices of other rulemaking agencies and 
recommendations of the Administrative Conference of the United States 
(``ACUS''), and better promote the purpose of the rules. The Commission 
is publishing this proposed amendment to inform that review.

A. Actions and Meetings

    This part of the proposed amendment amends Rules 2.2 and 3.3 to 
clarify and enumerate the types of Commission actions that are taken in 
public meetings, the types of actions that may be taken in nonpublic 
meetings or without a meeting, and the types of discussions with 
outside parties that may be held in nonpublic meetings. Cf. ACUS 
Recommendation 2014-2, ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (adopted June 
5, 2014) at ] 6.
    Rule 2.2 identifies certain types of actions that must be taken in 
a public meeting and a number of other types of actions, described as 
``miscellaneous matters,'' as actions that may be taken without a 
meeting. Many other types of Commission actions are not specifically 
enumerated. The proposed amendment revises Rule 2.2 to clarify and 
enumerate the actions that must be taken in public meetings and the 
actions that may be taken in nonpublic meetings or without a meeting. 
Specifically, votes on final priorities and votes to approve or revise 
the minutes of public meetings must be taken at public meetings, and a 
number of other actions may be taken at nonpublic meetings or without a 
meeting. It also clarifies that the actions authorized to be taken in 
nonpublic meetings or without a meeting are not precluded from being 
taken in public meetings.
    Rule 3.3 identifies the purposes for holding nonpublic meetings: To 
transact certain types of Commission business, to hold discussions with 
Commission staff, and to discuss with outside parties certain types of 
sensitive information. The proposed amendment revises Rule 3.3 to 
clarify and enumerate the purposes for holding nonpublic meetings. As 
revised, Rule 3.3 identifies five purposes for holding nonpublic 
meetings and provides more clarity and specificity about these 
different purposes. To summarize, they include: (1) To take action on 
other matters pursuant to Rule 2.2; (2) to hold discussions with 
Commission staff and ex officio staff; (3) to hold discussions with 
advisory groups, with persons within the judiciary, or with persons in 
the executive or legislative branches; (4) to discuss sensitive 
information with outside parties (with a number of examples); and (5) 
to hold discussions with outside experts, such as in a roundtable or 
symposium, on matters unrelated to the merits of any pending proposed 
amendment.
    For nonpublic meetings covered by purpose (5), it adds that such 
meetings may be held under ``Chatham House Rule'' and may include 
outside observers.
    Finally, it amends Rule 6.2 to delete language requiring the Office 
of Legislative and Public Affairs to maintain certain information about 
nonpublic meetings.

B. Public Meetings and Hearings

    This part of the proposed amendment amends Rules 3.2 and 3.5 to 
provide more information to the public about

[[Page 18696]]

public meetings and hearings. Cf. ACUS Recommendation 2014-2, 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (adopted June 5, 2014).
    Rule 3.2 currently provides that notice of a public meeting shall 
be issued at least seven days prior to the date of the meeting and, 
where practicable, shall include an agenda and any documents approved 
for public release. The proposed amendment specifies that any documents 
approved for public release shall be posted to the Web site and made 
available by other means, ``as soon as practicable''--if not before the 
meeting, then at the start of the meeting or in a timely manner 
afterward.
    Rule 3.5 provides for the Commission to ``tape record'' public 
meetings and maintain a written transcription of public hearings. The 
proposed amendment specifies that the Commission may provide a live 
webcast or audiocast of its public meetings and public hearings and 
make the recordings available through the Web site.

C. Decisions on Retroactivity

    This part of the proposed amendment makes substantive and clerical 
changes to the rules on considering retroactivity. First, as a clerical 
change, it moves the provision on retroactivity from the end of Rule 
4.1 to a new Rule 4.1A. Second, it changes the provision on 
retroactivity to state that when the Commission wishes to consider 
whether to make an amendment available for retroactive application, it 
shall publish a request for comment, make a retroactivity impact 
analysis available to the public, hold a public hearing, and then vote 
on whether to make the amendment retroactive at a public meeting at 
least 60 days before the effective date of the amendment.

D. Public Comment and Priorities

    This part of the proposed amendment addresses issues relating to 
public comment on amendments, as well as the Commission's consideration 
of priorities.
    First, Rule 4.3 addresses the public comment process for amendments 
to the Guidelines Manual. The proposed amendment makes two additions to 
Rule 4.3. The first addition provides that the Commission may divide a 
public comment period into an original comment phase and a reply 
comment phase. Cf. ACUS Recommendation 2011-2, ``Rulemaking Comments'' 
(adopted June 16, 2011). The second addition addresses how, if at all, 
the Commission considers public comment that arrives late and reply 
comment on issues not raised during the original comment phase, and 
states that such late or non-responsive comment may not be considered. 
Cf. ACUS Recommendation 2011-2, ``Rulemaking Comments'' (adopted June 
16, 2011).
    Second, Rule 5.1 identifies the Office of Legislative and Public 
Affairs as the repository for the Commission's public comment and 
public hearing testimony. The proposed amendment adds a sentence to 
Rule 5.1 to provide that the public comment and public hearing 
testimony shall be made available to the public ``through the 
Commission's Web site'' and that this shall occur ``as soon as 
practicable after the close of the comment period.'' Cf. ACUS 
Recommendation 2011-2, ``Rulemaking Comments'' (adopted June 16, 2011). 
The proposed amendment also clarifies that, where appropriate, the 
Commission may decline to make available public comment that is 
duplicative and may redact sensitive information from public comment.
    Finally, the proposed amendment makes several additions to Rule 5.2 
to set forth certain matters to be considered by the Commission in 
setting its priorities. It also establishes a new Rule 5.6 to address 
petitions filed by defendants under 28 U.S.C. 994(s). Cf. ACUS 
Recommendation 2014-6, ``Petitions for Rulemaking'' (adopted December 
5, 2014).
    The first addition relates to the Commission's responsibility under 
28 U.S.C. 994(g) to consider the impact on available penal and 
correctional resources. Currently, Rule 4.2 requires the Commission to 
consider prison impact before it promulgates an amendment. The proposal 
would revise Rule 5.2 to include a similar requirement that the 
Commission consider prison impact in setting its priorities. Relatedly, 
the proposal would state that, in setting its priorities, the 
Commission shall also consider, among other factors, the number of 
defendants potentially involved and the magnitude of the potential 
impact.
    The second addition to Rule 5.2 is a set of factors to be 
considered by the Commission in determining which, if any, circuit 
conflicts to resolve. These factors were originally published by the 
Commission in the Federal Register in August 2000, see 65 FR 50034 
(August 16, 2000).
    The final addition to Rule 5.2 would clarify how written 
submissions and section 994(s) petitions relate to the priorities. 
Although the Commission provides a specific period each year for public 
comment on the priorities, suggestions about priorities have been made 
at other times of the year. An outside party may submit a suggestion 
immediately before the comment period on the priorities has opened, or 
long after it has closed, or during a different comment period (such as 
the comment period on a proposed amendment). The proposed amendment 
would provide for these mis-timed submissions to be carried over to the 
next priorities cycle and considered during that priorities cycle.
    Similarly, defendants may submit petitions under section 994(s) at 
any time of the year. The proposed amendment would provide for section 
994(s) petitions to be treated in the same way, i.e., they would be 
carried over to the next priorities cycle and considered during that 
priorities cycle. In addition, the proposed amendment would establish a 
new Rule 5.6 for section 994(s) petitions. The new rule would 
incorporate section 994(s) into the Rules of Practice and Procedure and 
provide that the Commission will give due consideration to the 
petitions when it sets its priorities.

E. Input From Outside Parties; Ex Parte Communications

    This part of the proposed amendment provides guidance on the 
Commission's practices relating to input from outside parties. Cf. ACUS 
Recommendation 2014-4, ```Ex Parte' Communications in Informal 
Rulemaking'' (adopted June 6, 2014); ACUS Recommendation 80-6, 
``Intragovernmental Communications in Informal Rulemaking Proceedings'' 
(adopted December 12, 1980). The Commission's practice of soliciting 
input from outside parties is currently contained in a single sentence 
at the end of Rule 5.4 (which generally relates to the Commission's 
established advisory groups). It states that ``the Commission expects 
to solicit input, from time to time, from outside groups representing 
the federal judiciary, prosecutors, defense attorneys, crime victims, 
and other interested groups.''
    The proposed amendment moves this principle to a new Rule 5.5 and 
revises it to clarify that the Commission, individual Commissioners, 
and Commission staff may consult with such outside groups, and that the 
consultation may involve any matter affecting the Commission's 
business.
    In addition, the proposed amendment provides specific guidance on 
ex parte communications on the merits of a proposed amendment, during 
the pendency of the proposed amendment, from outside parties.

F. Use of Social Media Platforms

    This part of the proposed amendment expands Rule 6.3, which relates 
to the Commission's Web site and the

[[Page 18697]]

information available there. Specifically, the proposed amendment would 
expand Rule 6.3 to also encompass other electronic resources offered by 
the Commission, including social media platforms (such as Twitter) and 
electronic distribution mechanisms (such as email listservs). It would 
add to Rule 6.3 a requirement that the Commission ``use a variety of 
electronic means to distribute public meeting notices and provide other 
information about the Commission,'' such as social media platforms and 
electronic distribution mechanisms. Cf. ACUS Recommendation 2014-2, 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (adopted June 5, 2014) at ] 3.

G. Clerical Changes

    Finally, the proposed amendment makes certain clerical changes to 
the Rules. It provides an introductory provision about the Commission, 
updates the name of the Office of Legislative and Public Affairs, 
provides relevant statutory citations, and inserts subdivision 
designations to divide rules into separate parts.

Proposed Amendment

(A) Actions and Meetings

    Rule 2.2 is amended by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Except''; by 
inserting ``(b)'' before ``Promulgation''; by striking ``The decision 
to instruct staff to prepare a retroactivity impact analysis for a 
proposed amendment shall require the affirmative vote of at least three 
members at a public meeting.'' and inserting the following new 
paragraphs:
    ``Approval of a notice of priorities shall require the affirmative 
vote, at a public meeting, of a majority of the members then serving.
    Adoption or revision of the minutes of a public meeting shall 
require the affirmative vote, at a public meeting, of a majority of the 
members then serving.'';
    by striking the paragraph that begins ``Action on miscellaneous 
matters'' and inserting the following as a new subsection:
    ``(c) Action on other matters may be taken (1) at a nonpublic 
meeting; or (2) without a meeting by written or oral communication 
(e.g., by ``notation voting''), and shall be based on the affirmative 
vote of a majority of the members then serving. Such matters include 
the approval of budget requests, administrative and personnel issues, 
decisions on contracts and cooperative agreements, decisions on 
workshops and training programs, decisions on publishing reports and 
making recommendations to Congress, decisions to hold hearings and call 
witnesses, decisions on litigation and administrative proceedings 
involving the Commission, decisions relating to the formation and 
membership of advisory groups, the approval pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 
994(w) of a statement of reasons form, notices of proposed priorities, 
extensions of public comment periods, notices of proposed amendments to 
these rules, approval of technical and clerical amendments to these 
rules, and decisions to hold a nonpublic meeting. The Commission is not 
precluded from acting on such matters at a public meeting.'';
    and by inserting ``(d)'' before ``A motion to reconsider''.
    Rule 3.3 is amended by striking ``The Commission may hold'' and all 
that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:
    ``The Chair may call nonpublic meetings for purposes of the 
following:
    (1) To take actions on other matters (see Rule 2.2(c)).
    (2) To receive information from, and participate in discussions 
with, Commission staff or any person designated by an ex officio 
Commissioner as support staff for that Commissioner.
    (3) To receive information from, and participate in discussions 
with, (A) members of advisory groups; (B) interested parties within the 
judicial branch (e.g., federal judges; the Criminal Law Committee; the 
Federal Public and Community Defenders); or (C) interested parties 
within the executive or legislative branches.
    (4) Upon a decision by a majority of the members then serving, to 
receive or share information, from or with any other person, that is 
inappropriate for public disclosure (e.g., classified information; 
privileged or confidential information; trade secrets; or information 
the disclosure of which would interfere with law enforcement 
proceedings, deprive a person of a right to a fair trial, constitute an 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, compromise a confidential 
source, disclose law enforcement investigative techniques and 
procedures, endanger the life or safety of judicial or law enforcement 
personnel, or be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a 
proposed agency action).
    (5) Upon a decision by a majority of the members then serving, to 
receive information from, and participate in discussions with, outside 
experts, on matters unrelated to the merits of any pending proposed 
amendment to the guidelines, policy statements, or commentary (e.g., to 
hold a symposium, convene an expert roundtable, or discuss local 
practices with a locality's judges and practitioners). At the 
discretion of the Chair, such a meeting may be held under `Chatham 
House Rule.' Subject to the discretion and control of the Chair, one or 
more persons may be permitted to attend such a meeting as outside 
observers. Where the number of outside observers is limited, the Chair 
may give priority to individuals referred to in subdivision (3).''
    Rule 6.2 is amended in the heading by striking ``Publishing'' and 
inserting ``Legislative'', and in the text by striking ``Publishing'' 
each place the term appears and inserting ``Legislative''; by inserting 
``and'' before ``(5)''; and by striking ``; and (6)'' and all that 
follows through ``parties.'' and inserting a period.

(B) Public Meetings and Hearings

    Rule 3.2 is amended by inserting after the first sentence the 
following: ``See 28 U.S.C. 993(a).''; by inserting after ``approved'' 
the following: ``by the Chair''; by inserting after ``public release.'' 
the following new sentence: ``The notice shall be made available to the 
public on the Commission's Web site.''; and by inserting after that new 
sentence the following new paragraph:
    ``Any related documents approved for public release shall be made 
available to the public as soon as practicable (e.g., if not in advance 
of the meeting, then at the start of the meeting or in a timely manner 
after the meeting), on the Commission's Web site.''.
    Rule 3.5 is amended in the heading by striking ``Written Record of 
Meetings and Hearings'' and inserting ``Live Webcasts and Written 
Records''; in the text by inserting before the first paragraph the 
following new paragraph:
    ``To the extent practicable, and at the discretion and control of 
the Chair, the Commission shall provide a live webcast or audiocast of 
its public meetings and public hearings and shall make available a 
recording of the webcast or audiocast through the Commission's Web 
site.'';
    and by striking ``tape record'' and inserting ``make an audio 
recording of''.

(C) Decisions on Retroactivity

    Rule 4.1 is amended by inserting the following heading before the 
paragraph that begins ``Generally,'' to establish it as a new Rule 
4.1A:
    ``Rule 4.1A--Retroactive Application of Amendments''.
    Rule 4.1A (as so established) is amended by striking ``, it shall 
decide whether to make'' and all that follows through the period at the 
end and inserting the following: ``(see 28 U.S.C.

[[Page 18698]]

994(u); 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)), the Commission shall--
    (1) at the public meeting at which it votes to promulgate the 
amendment, or in a timely manner thereafter, vote to publish a request 
for comment on whether to make the amendment available for retroactive 
application;
    (2) instruct staff to prepare a retroactivity impact analysis of 
the amendment, if practicable, and make such an analysis available in a 
timely manner to Congress and the public;
    (3) hold a public hearing on whether to make the amendment 
available for retroactive application; and
    (4) at a public meeting held at least 60 calendar days before the 
effective date of the amendment, vote on whether to make the amendment 
available for retroactive application.''.

(D) Public Comment and Priorities

    Rule 4.3 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraphs:
    ``Where appropriate, the Commission may divide a comment period 
into an original comment phase and a reply comment phase. For example, 
the Commission may divide a comment period of 60 calendar days into an 
original comment phase of 40 calendar days and a reply comment phase of 
20 calendar days. Comments during a reply phase are limited to issues 
raised in the original comment phase.
    Public comment received after the close of the comment period, and 
reply comment received on issues not raised in the original comment 
phase, may not be considered.''.
    Rule 5.1 is amended by striking ``Publishing'' and inserting 
``Legislative''; in the paragraph that begins ``The Office'' by adding 
at the end of the paragraph the following: ``As soon as practicable 
after the close of the comment period (or the comment phase, as 
applicable), public comment and public hearing testimony shall be made 
available to the public through the Commission's Web site.''; by 
striking ``pursuant to a solicitation'' and inserting ``pursuant to or 
in anticipation of a request for public comment''; and by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``Where appropriate, the Commission may decline to make available 
public comment that is duplicative and may redact sensitive information 
from public comment.''.
    Rule 5.2 is amended by inserting ``(a)'' before ``The Commission'' 
in the first paragraph; by striking ``tentative'' both places such term 
appears and inserting ``proposed''; and by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs:
    ``(b) In setting its priorities, the Commission shall consider the 
impact of the priorities on available penal and correctional resources, 
and on other facilities and services. See 28 U.S.C. 994(g). The 
Commission shall also consider, among other factors, the number of 
defendants potentially involved and the potential impact.
    (c) The Commission's priorities may include resolution of circuit 
conflicts, pursuant to the Commission's continuing authority and 
responsibility, under 28 U.S.C. 991(b)(1)(B) and Braxton v. United 
States, 500 U.S. 344 (1991), to resolve conflicting interpretations of 
the guidelines by the federal courts. The Commission will consider the 
following non-exhaustive list of factors in deciding whether a 
particular guideline circuit conflict warrants resolution by the 
Commission:
    (1) potential defendant impact;
    (2) potential impact on sentencing disparity;
    (3) number of court decisions involved in the conflict and 
variation in holdings; and
    (4) ease of resolution, both as a discrete issue, and in the 
context of other agenda matters scheduled for consideration during the 
available amendment cycle.
    (d) There may be circumstances in which the Commission receives--
before the comment period on the next year's priorities begins--a 
written submission from an outside party or a petition of a defendant 
under section 994(s) of title 28, United States Code (see Rule 5.6), 
that raises an issue more appropriately considered for the next year's 
priorities. In such circumstances, the Commission shall consider that 
issue when it sets the next year's priorities.''.
    Part V is amended by adding at the end the following new Rule 5.6:
    ``Rule 5.6--Petitions Filed By Defendants Under Section 994(s)
    Pursuant to section 994(s) of title 28, United States Code, a 
defendant may file a petition with the Commission requesting a 
modification of the guidelines used in sentencing that defendant. To be 
covered by section 994(s), the petition must be on the basis of changed 
circumstances unrelated to the defendant, including changes in (1) the 
community view of the gravity of the offense; (2) the public concern 
generated by the offense; and (3) the deterrent effect particular 
sentences may have on the commission of the offense by others. See 28 
U.S.C. 994(s).
    The Commission shall give due consideration to petitions covered by 
section 994(s) when it sets its priorities under Rule 5.2.''.

(E) Input From Outside Parties; ``Ex Parte'' Communications

    Rule 5.4 is amended by striking the paragraph that begins ``In 
addition,''.
    Part V is amended by inserting after Rule 5.4 the following new 
Rule 5.5:
    ``Rule 5.5--Outside Consultations and Ex Parte Communications
    (a) From time to time, the Commission, individual Commissioners, 
and Commission staff may consult with outside parties representing 
judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, crime victims, and other 
interested parties. The consultation may involve any matter affecting 
the Commission's business, including matters relating to the 
Commission's priorities.
    (b) However, during the pendency of a proposed amendment:
    (1) The Commission does not intend to solicit ex parte 
communications (i.e., communications outside the public comment 
process) on the merits of the proposed amendment from outside parties, 
except where it can be done in an equitable manner.
    (2) Outside parties should not make unsolicited ex parte 
communications on the merits of the proposed amendment to an individual 
Commissioner or to the Commissioners collectively.
    (3) If any communication covered by subdivision (2) is received by 
an individual Commissioner or the Commissioners collectively, [and the 
communication involves significant information or argument on the 
merits,] the communication shall be treated as public comment and 
disclosed accordingly. If it is an oral communication, a summary of the 
communication shall be treated as public comment and disclosed 
accordingly.
    [(c) Subsection (b) does not apply to communications with--
    (1) an ex officio Commissioner or any person designated by an ex 
officio Commissioner as support staff for that Commissioner;
    (2) Members of Congress, congressional staff, and legislative 
branch agencies;
    (3) the Executive Office of the President; and
    (4) Justices of the Supreme Court, federal judges, and the 
leadership staff of the Judicial Conference of the United States or its 
committees.]''.

(F) Use of Social Media Platforms

    Rule 6.3 is amended in the heading by inserting after ``Internet 
Site'' the following: ``and Other Electronic Resources''; in the text 
by striking ``Web site'' both places such term appears and

[[Page 18699]]

inserting ``Web site''; and by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``To the extent practicable, the Commission shall use a variety of 
electronic means to distribute public meeting notices and provide other 
information about the Commission. For example, the Office of 
Legislative and Public Affairs shall, where practicable and 
appropriate, use social media platforms (such as Twitter) and 
electronic distribution mechanisms (such as an email listserv). 
Information about these platforms and mechanisms shall be posted to the 
Commission's Web site.''.

(G) Clerical Changes

    The Rules of Practice and Procedure are amended by inserting before 
Part I the following undesignated section:
    ``About the Commission
    The United States Sentencing Commission is an independent agency in 
the judicial branch of government. Its principal purposes are:
    (1) to establish sentencing policies and practices for the federal 
courts, including guidelines to be consulted regarding the appropriate 
form and severity of punishment for offenders convicted of federal 
crimes;
    (2) to advise and assist Congress and the executive branch in the 
development of effective and efficient crime policy; and
    (3) to collect, analyze, research, and distribute a broad array of 
information on federal crime and sentencing issues, serving as an 
information resource for Congress, the executive branch, the courts, 
criminal justice practitioners, the academic community, and the 
public.''.
    Rule 1.1 is amended by inserting a paragraph break before ``The 
Commission, an agency''; by inserting after ``Federal Advisory 
Committee Act'' the following: ``(5 U.S.C. App.)''; by striking 
``Sunshine Act'' and inserting ``Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b)''; by inserting after ``Freedom of Information Act'' the 
following: ``(5 U.S.C. 552)''; and by inserting a paragraph break 
before ``Accordingly,''.
    Rule 3.1 is amended by inserting after ``meetings.'' the following: 
``See 28 U.S.C. 993(a).''.
    Rule 3.4 is amended by inserting after ``business.'' the following: 
``See 28 U.S.C. 995(a)(21).''.
    Rule 4.2 is amended by inserting after ``public.'' the following: 
``See 28 U.S.C. 994(g).''.
    Rule 5.3 is amended by striking ``Publishing'' and inserting 
``Legislative''.
[FR Doc. 2016-07264 Filed 3-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 2210-40-P



                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices                                             18695

                                                  MPRA, that application has been                         Commission also periodically reviews                  ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’
                                                  published on Treasury’s Web site at                     and revises previously promulgated                    (adopted June 5, 2014) at ¶ 6.
                                                  http://www.treasury.gov/services/Pages/                 guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o)                  Rule 2.2 identifies certain types of
                                                  Plan-Applications.aspx. Treasury is                     and submits guideline amendments to                   actions that must be taken in a public
                                                  publishing this notice in the Federal                   the Congress not later than the first day             meeting and a number of other types of
                                                  Register, in consultation with PBGC and                 of May each year pursuant to 28 U.S.C.                actions, described as ‘‘miscellaneous
                                                  the Department of Labor, to solicit                     994(p).                                               matters,’’ as actions that may be taken
                                                  public comments on all aspects of the                     Section 995(a)(1) of title 28, United               without a meeting. Many other types of
                                                  Road Carriers—Local 707 Pension Fund                    States Code, authorizes the Commission                Commission actions are not specifically
                                                  application.                                            to establish general policies and                     enumerated. The proposed amendment
                                                    Comments are requested from                           promulgate rules and regulations as                   revises Rule 2.2 to clarify and
                                                  interested parties, including                           necessary for the Commission to carry                 enumerate the actions that must be
                                                  contributing employers, employee                        out the purposes of the Sentencing                    taken in public meetings and the actions
                                                  organizations, and participants and                     Reform Act of 1984. The Commission                    that may be taken in nonpublic
                                                  beneficiaries of the Road Carriers—                     originally adopted the Rules of Practice              meetings or without a meeting.
                                                  Local 707 Pension Fund. Consideration                   and Procedure in July 1997 and now                    Specifically, votes on final priorities
                                                  will be given to any comments that are                  proposes to make amendments to these                  and votes to approve or revise the
                                                  timely received by Treasury.                            rules. In accordance with Rule 1.2 of its             minutes of public meetings must be
                                                    Dated: March 25, 2016.                                Rules of Practice and Procedure, the                  taken at public meetings, and a number
                                                                                                          Commission hereby invites the public to               of other actions may be taken at
                                                  David R. Pearl,
                                                                                                          provide comment on the proposed                       nonpublic meetings or without a
                                                  Executive Secretary, Department of the                                                                        meeting. It also clarifies that the actions
                                                  Treasury.                                               amendments.
                                                                                                            Bracketed text within a proposed                    authorized to be taken in nonpublic
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–07269 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          amendment indicates a heightened                      meetings or without a meeting are not
                                                  BILLING CODE 4810–25–P                                                                                        precluded from being taken in public
                                                                                                          interest on the Commission’s part in
                                                                                                          comment and suggestions on whether                    meetings.
                                                                                                          the proposed provision is appropriate.                   Rule 3.3 identifies the purposes for
                                                  UNITED STATES SENTENCING                                                                                      holding nonpublic meetings: To transact
                                                  COMMISSION                                                Authority: 28 U.S.C. 995(a)(1); USSC
                                                                                                          Rules of Practice and Procedure, Rule 1.2.
                                                                                                                                                                certain types of Commission business,
                                                                                                                                                                to hold discussions with Commission
                                                  Rules of Practice and Procedure                         Patti B. Saris,                                       staff, and to discuss with outside parties
                                                  AGENCY:  United States Sentencing                       Chair.                                                certain types of sensitive information.
                                                  Commission.                                                                                                   The proposed amendment revises Rule
                                                                                                          1. Rules of Practice and Procedure
                                                  ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments                                                                         3.3 to clarify and enumerate the
                                                                                                             Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:                    purposes for holding nonpublic
                                                  to the Sentencing Commission’s Rules
                                                                                                          This proposed amendment revises the                   meetings. As revised, Rule 3.3 identifies
                                                  of Practice and Procedure. Request for
                                                                                                          Commission’s Rules of Practice and                    five purposes for holding nonpublic
                                                  public comment.
                                                                                                          Procedure. The rules were issued in                   meetings and provides more clarity and
                                                  SUMMARY:   This notice sets forth                       1997 ‘‘for the purpose of more fully                  specificity about these different
                                                  proposed amendments to the                              informing interested persons of                       purposes. To summarize, they include:
                                                  Commission’s Rules of Practice and                      opportunities and procedures for                      (1) To take action on other matters
                                                  Procedure. The Commission invites                       becoming aware of and participating in                pursuant to Rule 2.2; (2) to hold
                                                  public comment on these proposed                        the public business of the Commission.’’              discussions with Commission staff and
                                                  amendments.                                             See Rule 1.1 of the Commission’s Rules                ex officio staff; (3) to hold discussions
                                                                                                          of Practice and Procedure. The                        with advisory groups, with persons
                                                  DATES: Public comment should be
                                                                                                          Commission is conducting a review of                  within the judiciary, or with persons in
                                                  received by the Commission not later
                                                                                                          its rules to determine whether any                    the executive or legislative branches; (4)
                                                  than June 1, 2016.
                                                                                                          updates or revisions are appropriate,                 to discuss sensitive information with
                                                  ADDRESSES: Public comment should be
                                                                                                          such as to reflect current technologies,              outside parties (with a number of
                                                  sent to the Commission by electronic                    take into account practices of other
                                                  mail or regular mail. The email address                                                                       examples); and (5) to hold discussions
                                                                                                          rulemaking agencies and                               with outside experts, such as in a
                                                  for public comment is Public_                           recommendations of the Administrative
                                                  Comment@ussc.gov. The regular mail                                                                            roundtable or symposium, on matters
                                                                                                          Conference of the United States                       unrelated to the merits of any pending
                                                  address for public comment is United                    (‘‘ACUS’’), and better promote the
                                                  States Sentencing Commission, One                                                                             proposed amendment.
                                                                                                          purpose of the rules. The Commission is                  For nonpublic meetings covered by
                                                  Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2–500,                      publishing this proposed amendment to                 purpose (5), it adds that such meetings
                                                  Washington, DC 20002–8002, Attention:                   inform that review.                                   may be held under ‘‘Chatham House
                                                  Public Affairs.
                                                                                                          A. Actions and Meetings                               Rule’’ and may include outside
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
                                                                                                                                                                observers.
                                                  Osterrieder, Legislative Specialist, (202)                This part of the proposed amendment                    Finally, it amends Rule 6.2 to delete
                                                  502–4500, pubaffairs@ussc.gov.                          amends Rules 2.2 and 3.3 to clarify and               language requiring the Office of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                          enumerate the types of Commission                     Legislative and Public Affairs to
                                                  United States Sentencing Commission is                  actions that are taken in public                      maintain certain information about
                                                  an independent agency in the judicial                   meetings, the types of actions that may               nonpublic meetings.
                                                  branch of the United States                             be taken in nonpublic meetings or
                                                  Government. The Commission                              without a meeting, and the types of                   B. Public Meetings and Hearings
                                                  promulgates sentencing guidelines and                   discussions with outside parties that                   This part of the proposed amendment
                                                  policy statements for federal courts                    may be held in nonpublic meetings. Cf.                amends Rules 3.2 and 3.5 to provide
                                                  pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The                       ACUS Recommendation 2014–2,                           more information to the public about


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:09 Mar 30, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00132   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM   31MRN1


                                                  18696                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices

                                                  public meetings and hearings. Cf. ACUS                  comment phase, and states that such                   immediately before the comment period
                                                  Recommendation 2014–2, ‘‘Government                     late or non-responsive comment may                    on the priorities has opened, or long
                                                  in the Sunshine Act’’ (adopted June 5,                  not be considered. Cf. ACUS                           after it has closed, or during a different
                                                  2014).                                                  Recommendation 2011–2, ‘‘Rulemaking                   comment period (such as the comment
                                                     Rule 3.2 currently provides that                     Comments’’ (adopted June 16, 2011).                   period on a proposed amendment). The
                                                  notice of a public meeting shall be                        Second, Rule 5.1 identifies the Office             proposed amendment would provide for
                                                  issued at least seven days prior to the                 of Legislative and Public Affairs as the              these mis-timed submissions to be
                                                  date of the meeting and, where                          repository for the Commission’s public                carried over to the next priorities cycle
                                                  practicable, shall include an agenda and                comment and public hearing testimony.                 and considered during that priorities
                                                  any documents approved for public                       The proposed amendment adds a                         cycle.
                                                  release. The proposed amendment                         sentence to Rule 5.1 to provide that the                 Similarly, defendants may submit
                                                  specifies that any documents approved                   public comment and public hearing                     petitions under section 994(s) at any
                                                  for public release shall be posted to the               testimony shall be made available to the              time of the year. The proposed
                                                  Web site and made available by other                    public ‘‘through the Commission’s Web                 amendment would provide for section
                                                  means, ‘‘as soon as practicable’’—if not                site’’ and that this shall occur ‘‘as soon            994(s) petitions to be treated in the same
                                                  before the meeting, then at the start of                as practicable after the close of the                 way, i.e., they would be carried over to
                                                  the meeting or in a timely manner                       comment period.’’ Cf. ACUS                            the next priorities cycle and considered
                                                  afterward.                                              Recommendation 2011–2, ‘‘Rulemaking                   during that priorities cycle. In addition,
                                                     Rule 3.5 provides for the Commission                 Comments’’ (adopted June 16, 2011).                   the proposed amendment would
                                                  to ‘‘tape record’’ public meetings and                  The proposed amendment also clarifies                 establish a new Rule 5.6 for section
                                                  maintain a written transcription of                     that, where appropriate, the                          994(s) petitions. The new rule would
                                                  public hearings. The proposed                           Commission may decline to make                        incorporate section 994(s) into the Rules
                                                  amendment specifies that the                            available public comment that is                      of Practice and Procedure and provide
                                                  Commission may provide a live webcast                   duplicative and may redact sensitive                  that the Commission will give due
                                                  or audiocast of its public meetings and                 information from public comment.                      consideration to the petitions when it
                                                  public hearings and make the recordings                    Finally, the proposed amendment                    sets its priorities.
                                                  available through the Web site.                         makes several additions to Rule 5.2 to
                                                                                                          set forth certain matters to be                       E. Input From Outside Parties; Ex Parte
                                                  C. Decisions on Retroactivity                           considered by the Commission in                       Communications
                                                     This part of the proposed amendment                  setting its priorities. It also establishes a            This part of the proposed amendment
                                                  makes substantive and clerical changes                  new Rule 5.6 to address petitions filed               provides guidance on the Commission’s
                                                  to the rules on considering retroactivity.              by defendants under 28 U.S.C. 994(s).                 practices relating to input from outside
                                                  First, as a clerical change, it moves the               Cf. ACUS Recommendation 2014–6,                       parties. Cf. ACUS Recommendation
                                                  provision on retroactivity from the end                 ‘‘Petitions for Rulemaking’’ (adopted                 2014–4, ‘‘‘Ex Parte’ Communications in
                                                  of Rule 4.1 to a new Rule 4.1A. Second,                 December 5, 2014).                                    Informal Rulemaking’’ (adopted June 6,
                                                  it changes the provision on retroactivity                  The first addition relates to the                  2014); ACUS Recommendation 80–6,
                                                  to state that when the Commission                       Commission’s responsibility under 28                  ‘‘Intragovernmental Communications in
                                                  wishes to consider whether to make an                   U.S.C. 994(g) to consider the impact on               Informal Rulemaking Proceedings’’
                                                  amendment available for retroactive                     available penal and correctional                      (adopted December 12, 1980). The
                                                  application, it shall publish a request for             resources. Currently, Rule 4.2 requires               Commission’s practice of soliciting
                                                  comment, make a retroactivity impact                    the Commission to consider prison                     input from outside parties is currently
                                                  analysis available to the public, hold a                impact before it promulgates an                       contained in a single sentence at the end
                                                  public hearing, and then vote on                        amendment. The proposal would revise                  of Rule 5.4 (which generally relates to
                                                  whether to make the amendment                           Rule 5.2 to include a similar                         the Commission’s established advisory
                                                  retroactive at a public meeting at least                requirement that the Commission                       groups). It states that ‘‘the Commission
                                                  60 days before the effective date of the                consider prison impact in setting its                 expects to solicit input, from time to
                                                  amendment.                                              priorities. Relatedly, the proposal would             time, from outside groups representing
                                                                                                          state that, in setting its priorities, the            the federal judiciary, prosecutors,
                                                  D. Public Comment and Priorities                        Commission shall also consider, among                 defense attorneys, crime victims, and
                                                     This part of the proposed amendment                  other factors, the number of defendants               other interested groups.’’
                                                  addresses issues relating to public                     potentially involved and the magnitude                   The proposed amendment moves this
                                                  comment on amendments, as well as the                   of the potential impact.                              principle to a new Rule 5.5 and revises
                                                  Commission’s consideration of                              The second addition to Rule 5.2 is a               it to clarify that the Commission,
                                                  priorities.                                             set of factors to be considered by the                individual Commissioners, and
                                                     First, Rule 4.3 addresses the public                 Commission in determining which, if                   Commission staff may consult with such
                                                  comment process for amendments to the                   any, circuit conflicts to resolve. These              outside groups, and that the
                                                  Guidelines Manual. The proposed                         factors were originally published by the              consultation may involve any matter
                                                  amendment makes two additions to                        Commission in the Federal Register in                 affecting the Commission’s business.
                                                  Rule 4.3. The first addition provides                   August 2000, see 65 FR 50034 (August                     In addition, the proposed amendment
                                                  that the Commission may divide a                        16, 2000).                                            provides specific guidance on ex parte
                                                  public comment period into an original                     The final addition to Rule 5.2 would               communications on the merits of a
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  comment phase and a reply comment                       clarify how written submissions and                   proposed amendment, during the
                                                  phase. Cf. ACUS Recommendation                          section 994(s) petitions relate to the                pendency of the proposed amendment,
                                                  2011–2, ‘‘Rulemaking Comments’’                         priorities. Although the Commission                   from outside parties.
                                                  (adopted June 16, 2011). The second                     provides a specific period each year for
                                                  addition addresses how, if at all, the                  public comment on the priorities,                     F. Use of Social Media Platforms
                                                  Commission considers public comment                     suggestions about priorities have been                  This part of the proposed amendment
                                                  that arrives late and reply comment on                  made at other times of the year. An                   expands Rule 6.3, which relates to the
                                                  issues not raised during the original                   outside party may submit a suggestion                 Commission’s Web site and the


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:09 Mar 30, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00133   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM   31MRN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices                                              18697

                                                  information available there.                            to hold hearings and call witnesses,                  discuss local practices with a locality’s
                                                  Specifically, the proposed amendment                    decisions on litigation and                           judges and practitioners). At the
                                                  would expand Rule 6.3 to also                           administrative proceedings involving                  discretion of the Chair, such a meeting
                                                  encompass other electronic resources                    the Commission, decisions relating to                 may be held under ‘Chatham House
                                                  offered by the Commission, including                    the formation and membership of                       Rule.’ Subject to the discretion and
                                                  social media platforms (such as Twitter)                advisory groups, the approval pursuant                control of the Chair, one or more
                                                  and electronic distribution mechanisms                  to 28 U.S.C. 994(w) of a statement of                 persons may be permitted to attend such
                                                  (such as email listservs). It would add                 reasons form, notices of proposed                     a meeting as outside observers. Where
                                                  to Rule 6.3 a requirement that the                      priorities, extensions of public comment              the number of outside observers is
                                                  Commission ‘‘use a variety of electronic                periods, notices of proposed                          limited, the Chair may give priority to
                                                  means to distribute public meeting                      amendments to these rules, approval of                individuals referred to in subdivision
                                                  notices and provide other information                   technical and clerical amendments to                  (3).’’
                                                  about the Commission,’’ such as social                  these rules, and decisions to hold a                     Rule 6.2 is amended in the heading by
                                                  media platforms and electronic                          nonpublic meeting. The Commission is                  striking ‘‘Publishing’’ and inserting
                                                  distribution mechanisms. Cf. ACUS                       not precluded from acting on such                     ‘‘Legislative’’, and in the text by striking
                                                  Recommendation 2014–2, ‘‘Government                     matters at a public meeting.’’;                       ‘‘Publishing’’ each place the term
                                                  in the Sunshine Act’’ (adopted June 5,                    and by inserting ‘‘(d)’’ before ‘‘A                 appears and inserting ‘‘Legislative’’; by
                                                  2014) at ¶ 3.                                           motion to reconsider’’.                               inserting ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(5)’’; and by
                                                                                                            Rule 3.3 is amended by striking ‘‘The               striking ‘‘; and (6)’’ and all that follows
                                                  G. Clerical Changes                                     Commission may hold’’ and all that                    through ‘‘parties.’’ and inserting a
                                                    Finally, the proposed amendment                       follows through the period at the end                 period.
                                                  makes certain clerical changes to the                   and inserting the following:
                                                                                                            ‘‘The Chair may call nonpublic                      (B) Public Meetings and Hearings
                                                  Rules. It provides an introductory
                                                  provision about the Commission,                         meetings for purposes of the following:                  Rule 3.2 is amended by inserting after
                                                  updates the name of the Office of                         (1) To take actions on other matters                the first sentence the following: ‘‘See 28
                                                  Legislative and Public Affairs, provides                (see Rule 2.2(c)).                                    U.S.C. 993(a).’’; by inserting after
                                                  relevant statutory citations, and inserts                 (2) To receive information from, and                ‘‘approved’’ the following: ‘‘by the
                                                  subdivision designations to divide rules                participate in discussions with,                      Chair’’; by inserting after ‘‘public
                                                  into separate parts.                                    Commission staff or any person                        release.’’ the following new sentence:
                                                                                                          designated by an ex officio                           ‘‘The notice shall be made available to
                                                  Proposed Amendment                                      Commissioner as support staff for that                the public on the Commission’s Web
                                                  (A) Actions and Meetings                                Commissioner.                                         site.’’; and by inserting after that new
                                                                                                            (3) To receive information from, and                sentence the following new paragraph:
                                                     Rule 2.2 is amended by inserting ‘‘(a)’’             participate in discussions with, (A)                     ‘‘Any related documents approved for
                                                  before ‘‘Except’’; by inserting ‘‘(b)’’                 members of advisory groups; (B)                       public release shall be made available to
                                                  before ‘‘Promulgation’’; by striking ‘‘The              interested parties within the judicial                the public as soon as practicable (e.g., if
                                                  decision to instruct staff to prepare a                 branch (e.g., federal judges; the Criminal            not in advance of the meeting, then at
                                                  retroactivity impact analysis for a                     Law Committee; the Federal Public and                 the start of the meeting or in a timely
                                                  proposed amendment shall require the                    Community Defenders); or (C) interested               manner after the meeting), on the
                                                  affirmative vote of at least three                      parties within the executive or                       Commission’s Web site.’’.
                                                  members at a public meeting.’’ and                      legislative branches.                                    Rule 3.5 is amended in the heading by
                                                  inserting the following new paragraphs:                   (4) Upon a decision by a majority of                striking ‘‘Written Record of Meetings
                                                     ‘‘Approval of a notice of priorities                 the members then serving, to receive or               and Hearings’’ and inserting ‘‘Live
                                                  shall require the affirmative vote, at a                share information, from or with any                   Webcasts and Written Records’’; in the
                                                  public meeting, of a majority of the                    other person, that is inappropriate for               text by inserting before the first
                                                  members then serving.                                   public disclosure (e.g., classified                   paragraph the following new paragraph:
                                                     Adoption or revision of the minutes of               information; privileged or confidential                  ‘‘To the extent practicable, and at the
                                                  a public meeting shall require the                      information; trade secrets; or                        discretion and control of the Chair, the
                                                  affirmative vote, at a public meeting, of               information the disclosure of which                   Commission shall provide a live
                                                  a majority of the members then                          would interfere with law enforcement                  webcast or audiocast of its public
                                                  serving.’’;                                             proceedings, deprive a person of a right              meetings and public hearings and shall
                                                     by striking the paragraph that begins                to a fair trial, constitute an unwarranted            make available a recording of the
                                                  ‘‘Action on miscellaneous matters’’ and                 invasion of personal privacy,                         webcast or audiocast through the
                                                  inserting the following as a new                        compromise a confidential source,                     Commission’s Web site.’’;
                                                  subsection:                                             disclose law enforcement investigative                   and by striking ‘‘tape record’’ and
                                                     ‘‘(c) Action on other matters may be                 techniques and procedures, endanger                   inserting ‘‘make an audio recording of’’.
                                                  taken (1) at a nonpublic meeting; or (2)                the life or safety of judicial or law
                                                  without a meeting by written or oral                    enforcement personnel, or be likely to                (C) Decisions on Retroactivity
                                                  communication (e.g., by ‘‘notation                      significantly frustrate implementation of               Rule 4.1 is amended by inserting the
                                                  voting’’), and shall be based on the                    a proposed agency action).                            following heading before the paragraph
                                                  affirmative vote of a majority of the                     (5) Upon a decision by a majority of                that begins ‘‘Generally,’’ to establish it
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  members then serving. Such matters                      the members then serving, to receive                  as a new Rule 4.1A:
                                                  include the approval of budget requests,                information from, and participate in                    ‘‘Rule 4.1A—Retroactive Application
                                                  administrative and personnel issues,                    discussions with, outside experts, on                 of Amendments’’.
                                                  decisions on contracts and cooperative                  matters unrelated to the merits of any                  Rule 4.1A (as so established) is
                                                  agreements, decisions on workshops                      pending proposed amendment to the                     amended by striking ‘‘, it shall decide
                                                  and training programs, decisions on                     guidelines, policy statements, or                     whether to make’’ and all that follows
                                                  publishing reports and making                           commentary (e.g., to hold a symposium,                through the period at the end and
                                                  recommendations to Congress, decisions                  convene an expert roundtable, or                      inserting the following: ‘‘(see 28 U.S.C.


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:09 Mar 30, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00134   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM   31MRN1


                                                  18698                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices

                                                  994(u); 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)), the                         ‘‘(b) In setting its priorities, the               (E) Input From Outside Parties; ‘‘Ex
                                                  Commission shall—                                       Commission shall consider the impact                  Parte’’ Communications
                                                    (1) at the public meeting at which it                 of the priorities on available penal and                 Rule 5.4 is amended by striking the
                                                  votes to promulgate the amendment, or                   correctional resources, and on other                  paragraph that begins ‘‘In addition,’’.
                                                  in a timely manner thereafter, vote to                  facilities and services. See 28 U.S.C.                   Part V is amended by inserting after
                                                  publish a request for comment on                        994(g). The Commission shall also                     Rule 5.4 the following new Rule 5.5:
                                                  whether to make the amendment                           consider, among other factors, the                       ‘‘Rule 5.5—Outside Consultations and
                                                  available for retroactive application;                  number of defendants potentially                      Ex Parte Communications
                                                    (2) instruct staff to prepare a                       involved and the potential impact.                       (a) From time to time, the
                                                  retroactivity impact analysis of the                       (c) The Commission’s priorities may                Commission, individual
                                                  amendment, if practicable, and make                     include resolution of circuit conflicts,              Commissioners, and Commission staff
                                                  such an analysis available in a timely                  pursuant to the Commission’s                          may consult with outside parties
                                                  manner to Congress and the public;                      continuing authority and responsibility,              representing judges, prosecutors,
                                                    (3) hold a public hearing on whether                  under 28 U.S.C. 991(b)(1)(B) and                      defense attorneys, crime victims, and
                                                  to make the amendment available for                     Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344                other interested parties. The
                                                  retroactive application; and                            (1991), to resolve conflicting                        consultation may involve any matter
                                                    (4) at a public meeting held at least 60              interpretations of the guidelines by the              affecting the Commission’s business,
                                                  calendar days before the effective date                 federal courts. The Commission will                   including matters relating to the
                                                  of the amendment, vote on whether to                    consider the following non-exhaustive                 Commission’s priorities.
                                                  make the amendment available for                        list of factors in deciding whether a                    (b) However, during the pendency of
                                                  retroactive application.’’.                             particular guideline circuit conflict                 a proposed amendment:
                                                                                                          warrants resolution by the Commission:                   (1) The Commission does not intend
                                                  (D) Public Comment and Priorities                          (1) potential defendant impact;                    to solicit ex parte communications (i.e.,
                                                     Rule 4.3 is amended by adding at the                    (2) potential impact on sentencing                 communications outside the public
                                                  end the following new paragraphs:                       disparity;                                            comment process) on the merits of the
                                                     ‘‘Where appropriate, the Commission                     (3) number of court decisions                      proposed amendment from outside
                                                  may divide a comment period into an                     involved in the conflict and variation in             parties, except where it can be done in
                                                  original comment phase and a reply                      holdings; and                                         an equitable manner.
                                                  comment phase. For example, the                            (4) ease of resolution, both as a                     (2) Outside parties should not make
                                                  Commission may divide a comment                         discrete issue, and in the context of                 unsolicited ex parte communications on
                                                  period of 60 calendar days into an                      other agenda matters scheduled for                    the merits of the proposed amendment
                                                  original comment phase of 40 calendar                   consideration during the available                    to an individual Commissioner or to the
                                                  days and a reply comment phase of 20                    amendment cycle.                                      Commissioners collectively.
                                                  calendar days. Comments during a reply                     (d) There may be circumstances in                     (3) If any communication covered by
                                                  phase are limited to issues raised in the               which the Commission receives—before                  subdivision (2) is received by an
                                                  original comment phase.                                 the comment period on the next year’s                 individual Commissioner or the
                                                     Public comment received after the                    priorities begins—a written submission                Commissioners collectively, [and the
                                                  close of the comment period, and reply                  from an outside party or a petition of a              communication involves significant
                                                  comment received on issues not raised                   defendant under section 994(s) of title               information or argument on the merits,]
                                                  in the original comment phase, may not                  28, United States Code (see Rule 5.6),                the communication shall be treated as
                                                  be considered.’’.                                       that raises an issue more appropriately               public comment and disclosed
                                                     Rule 5.1 is amended by striking                      considered for the next year’s priorities.            accordingly. If it is an oral
                                                  ‘‘Publishing’’ and inserting                            In such circumstances, the Commission                 communication, a summary of the
                                                  ‘‘Legislative’’; in the paragraph that                  shall consider that issue when it sets the            communication shall be treated as
                                                  begins ‘‘The Office’’ by adding at the                  next year’s priorities.’’.                            public comment and disclosed
                                                  end of the paragraph the following: ‘‘As                   Part V is amended by adding at the                 accordingly.
                                                  soon as practicable after the close of the              end the following new Rule 5.6:                          [(c) Subsection (b) does not apply to
                                                  comment period (or the comment phase,                      ‘‘Rule 5.6—Petitions Filed By                      communications with—
                                                  as applicable), public comment and                      Defendants Under Section 994(s)                          (1) an ex officio Commissioner or any
                                                  public hearing testimony shall be made                     Pursuant to section 994(s) of title 28,            person designated by an ex officio
                                                  available to the public through the                     United States Code, a defendant may                   Commissioner as support staff for that
                                                  Commission’s Web site.’’; by striking                   file a petition with the Commission                   Commissioner;
                                                  ‘‘pursuant to a solicitation’’ and                      requesting a modification of the                         (2) Members of Congress,
                                                  inserting ‘‘pursuant to or in anticipation              guidelines used in sentencing that                    congressional staff, and legislative
                                                  of a request for public comment’’; and                  defendant. To be covered by section                   branch agencies;
                                                  by adding at the end the following new                  994(s), the petition must be on the basis                (3) the Executive Office of the
                                                  paragraph:                                              of changed circumstances unrelated to                 President; and
                                                     ‘‘Where appropriate, the Commission                  the defendant, including changes in (1)                  (4) Justices of the Supreme Court,
                                                  may decline to make available public                    the community view of the gravity of                  federal judges, and the leadership staff
                                                  comment that is duplicative and may                     the offense; (2) the public concern                   of the Judicial Conference of the United
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  redact sensitive information from public                generated by the offense; and (3) the                 States or its committees.]’’.
                                                  comment.’’.                                             deterrent effect particular sentences may
                                                     Rule 5.2 is amended by inserting ‘‘(a)’’             have on the commission of the offense                 (F) Use of Social Media Platforms
                                                  before ‘‘The Commission’’ in the first                  by others. See 28 U.S.C. 994(s).                         Rule 6.3 is amended in the heading by
                                                  paragraph; by striking ‘‘tentative’’ both                  The Commission shall give due                      inserting after ‘‘Internet Site’’ the
                                                  places such term appears and inserting                  consideration to petitions covered by                 following: ‘‘and Other Electronic
                                                  ‘‘proposed’’; and by adding at the end                  section 994(s) when it sets its priorities            Resources’’; in the text by striking ‘‘Web
                                                  the following new paragraphs:                           under Rule 5.2.’’.                                    site’’ both places such term appears and


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:09 Mar 30, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00135   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM   31MRN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2016 / Notices                                                  18699

                                                  inserting ‘‘Web site’’; and by adding at                in the judicial branch of government. Its             the following: ‘‘(5 U.S.C. App.)’’; by
                                                  the end the following new paragraph:                    principal purposes are:                               striking ‘‘Sunshine Act’’ and inserting
                                                    ‘‘To the extent practicable, the                         (1) to establish sentencing policies               ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act (5
                                                  Commission shall use a variety of                       and practices for the federal courts,                 U.S.C. 552b)’’; by inserting after
                                                  electronic means to distribute public                   including guidelines to be consulted                  ‘‘Freedom of Information Act’’ the
                                                  meeting notices and provide other                       regarding the appropriate form and                    following: ‘‘(5 U.S.C. 552)’’; and by
                                                  information about the Commission. For                   severity of punishment for offenders                  inserting a paragraph break before
                                                  example, the Office of Legislative and                  convicted of federal crimes;                          ‘‘Accordingly,’’.
                                                  Public Affairs shall, where practicable                    (2) to advise and assist Congress and                 Rule 3.1 is amended by inserting after
                                                  and appropriate, use social media                       the executive branch in the
                                                  platforms (such as Twitter) and                                                                               ‘‘meetings.’’ the following: ‘‘See 28
                                                                                                          development of effective and efficient                U.S.C. 993(a).’’.
                                                  electronic distribution mechanisms                      crime policy; and
                                                  (such as an email listserv). Information                                                                         Rule 3.4 is amended by inserting after
                                                                                                             (3) to collect, analyze, research, and             ‘‘business.’’ the following: ‘‘See 28
                                                  about these platforms and mechanisms
                                                                                                          distribute a broad array of information               U.S.C. 995(a)(21).’’.
                                                  shall be posted to the Commission’s
                                                                                                          on federal crime and sentencing issues,
                                                  Web site.’’.                                                                                                     Rule 4.2 is amended by inserting after
                                                                                                          serving as an information resource for
                                                  (G) Clerical Changes                                    Congress, the executive branch, the                   ‘‘public.’’ the following: ‘‘See 28 U.S.C.
                                                                                                          courts, criminal justice practitioners, the           994(g).’’.
                                                    The Rules of Practice and Procedure
                                                  are amended by inserting before Part I                  academic community, and the public.’’.                   Rule 5.3 is amended by striking
                                                  the following undesignated section:                        Rule 1.1 is amended by inserting a                 ‘‘Publishing’’ and inserting
                                                    ‘‘About the Commission                                paragraph break before ‘‘The                          ‘‘Legislative’’.
                                                    The United States Sentencing                          Commission, an agency’’; by inserting                 [FR Doc. 2016–07264 Filed 3–30–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  Commission is an independent agency                     after ‘‘Federal Advisory Committee Act’’              BILLING CODE 2210–40–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:09 Mar 30, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00136   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM   31MRN1



Document Created: 2016-03-31 00:55:42
Document Modified: 2016-03-31 00:55:42
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of proposed amendments to the Sentencing Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Request for public comment.
DatesPublic comment should be received by the Commission not later than June 1, 2016.
ContactMatt Osterrieder, Legislative Specialist, (202) 502-4500, [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 18695 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR