81 FR 24839 - Notice of intent to prepare a Joint Environmental Impact Statement and To Conduct Public Scoping
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 24839-24842 | |
| FR Document | 2016-09790 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 24839-24842] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-09790] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Notice of intent to prepare a Joint Environmental Impact Statement and To Conduct Public Scoping AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a Joint Environmental Impact Statement concerning the repair and maintenance of Bog Creek Road and closure of certain roads within the Blue-Grass Bear Management Unit in the Selkirk Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho; request for comments; and notice of public scoping. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This notice announces that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) Idaho Panhandle National Forests (IPNF) (collectively the ``Agencies'') intend to prepare a joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to identify and assess potential impacts upon the environment of: Repairing and maintaining an approximately 5.6-mile section of the existing Bog Creek Road, which is located in the Selkirk Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho, within approximately two miles of the Canadian border, on land within the Blue-Grass Bear Management Unit (BMU) that is managed by the IPNF; and closing for motorized use additional roads within the Blue- Grass BMU to comply with the IPNF Forest Plan Amendments for Motorized Access Management within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones (Access Amendment) and reduce road density in the Blue- Grass BMU. This notice initiates the public scoping process for the preparation of the EIS. The purpose of the public scoping process is to solicit public comments regarding the potential environmental impacts that may be addressed. This notice commences the public scoping period for which CBP and IPNF are requesting written comments. This process is being conducted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and CBP and Forest Service NEPA guidelines. Additionally, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the public scoping [[Page 24840]] process will allow members of the general public to provide CBP and IPNF comments on potential impacts to historic and cultural resources for the proposed action. DATES: The scoping comment period will be 30 days. To ensure consideration, comments must be received by May 27, 2016. Comments may be submitted as set forth in the ADDRESSES section of this document. This project implements a land management plan and is subject to 36 CFR part 218, subparts A and B of the Forest Service's Project-level Predecisional Administrative Review Process. Pursuant to 36 CFR part 218, only those who provide specific, written comments regarding the proposed project will be eligible to file an objection. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either by mail or by email at the addresses indicated below. To avoid duplication, please use only one of the following methods to provide written comments: (a) Via mail: Bog Creek Road EIS, P.O. Box 643, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86002-0643. (b) Via email: [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Enriquez, CBP, Border Patrol Facilities & Tactical Infrastructure Program Management Office, by telephone at (949) 643-6365, or by email at [email protected]. You may also visit the CBP public Web site for more information at: http://www.cbp.gov/about/environmental-cultural-stewardship/nepa-documents/docs-review. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Repairs and Maintenance to Bog Creek Road U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) protects the nation's borders from terrorism, human and drug smuggling, illegal migration, and agricultural pests while facilitating the flow of legitimate travel and trade. CBP does so by integrating modern technology, deploying highly trained law enforcement personnel, and developing public and private sector partnerships that advance its overall mission. At 5,500 miles in length, the Northern Border of the United States stands as the longest common border in the world. The terrain ranges from densely forested lands on the west and east coasts to open plains in the middle of the country. To complement its efforts, CBP uses partnerships with other Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to meet the challenges of ensuring security while facilitating legitimate trade and travel along this expansive and complex border area. The primary road that provides east-west access to the Northern Border in the Selkirk Mountains of Northern Idaho is Bog Creek Road. Bog Creek Road is situated on National Forest System lands that are a part of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests (IPNF). The area is managed by the IPNF unit of the Forest Service (also referred to as IPNF). The road is currently impassable to most vehicles. Bog Creek Road was closed on both ends in the late 1980s, to meet grizzly bear habitat requirements. As a result of the closure, the road has only been maintained on a limited basis. By the mid-1990s, the road had experienced minor failures. Around the year 2000, a large failure occurred when a large culvert failed due to heavy surface water runoff. At that time, the road became impassable to most vehicles. Currently, the road is gated at the east end and barricaded at the west end. In recent years, the road has been infrequently used by Forest Service and CBP personnel traveling on all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and horseback, but using ATVs requires a winch system to traverse the large culvert failure. Nearly the entire length of Bog Creek Road is now overgrown with alder brush, small trees, and other vegetation. Without access to the Northern Border area via Bog Creek Road, CBP must use a lengthy detour to get to the border, including using state highways in Washington and Idaho and other forest roads. This alternative route is approximately 180 miles and adds approximately four hours one way (eight hours total) to CBP patrol response times. Closing Additional Roads for Motorized Use Bog Creek Road is located within the Blue-Grass Bear Management Unit (BMU) of the Selkirk Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone (SRZ) of the IPNF. The IPNF has been working since the late 1980s to create secure habitat for grizzly bears. For example, Bog Creek Road was closed in the late 1980s to allow for more effective management of grizzly bear habitat. The IPNF continues to manage habitat conditions of the SRZ. To further manage grizzly bear habitat conditions, in 2011, the IPNF issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Forest Plan Amendments for Motorized Access Management within the Selkirk and Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones (Access Amendment). The Access Amendment set motorized vehicle access and security standards in the zones to conserve and contribute to the recovery of grizzly bears, and to meet the agency's responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These standards limit the use of motorized vehicles within the Blue-Grass BMU area to a specified percentage of the land. By limiting high levels of human activity in the area, effective habitat can be created for grizzly bears. The ROD and accompanying biological opinion from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service require the standards in the Access Amendment to be met by 2019. Currently, the BMU is not meeting the motorized access standards set forth in the Access Amendment. The status of all roads in the BMU area is of great interest to CBP since the entire Blue-Grass BMU is within 10 miles of the Northern Border. CBP needs good access to this area to execute its mission to protect the Northern Border. Because there are limited options regarding which roads to close for motorized use that meet the Access Amendment standards and the ESA, and which provide border access to CBP, the Agencies are working together to determine acceptable alternatives. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose and need of the proposed action is to provide improved east-west access across the Selkirk Mountains on National Forest System lands that would: (1) Enable CBP to execute its statutory mission to protect the U.S. Northern Border and provide for the safety of CBP and other law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and (2) meet Access Amendment standards for motorized access in a grizzly bear habitat in the Blue-Grass BMU area. Proposed Action Repairs and Maintenance to Bog Creek Road One aspect of the proposed action would involve the repair and maintenance of an approximately 5.6-mile section of the existing Bog Creek Road between Forest Road (FR) 1013 and FR 2450 within the Blue- Grass BMU of the SRZ of the IPNF. The road is located in the Selkirk Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho, within approximately two miles of the Canadian border. [[Page 24841]] The Agencies anticipate that the proposed action would likely involve replacing or repairing damaged culverts, grading and resurfacing areas that have been heavily eroded by surface water flows, infilling potholes, and removing protruding boulders. Although widening Bog Creek Road is not a part of the proposed action, there may be areas which no longer meet minimum width requirements and may require cut and fill work to achieve the desired road operating and safety standards. Trees and other vegetation within the roadway and to either side would likely be grubbed or cut back to facilitate safe vehicle passage. The proposed action would also likely include gathering and transporting fill materials (riprap, mixed soil/rock, and crushed aggregate) from ``borrow'' pits to use in general resurfacing/fill and in installation of the culvert replacements. Some equipment would be needed to perform the repairs and maintenance, including a dozer, a grader, a hydraulic excavator, and a dump truck. In addition, several pickup trucks or SUVs would be needed to transport construction personnel to and from the area. The Agencies anticipate that upon completion of the proposed repairs and maintenance, the 5.6-mile section of Bog Creek Road would remain closed for public motorized use and would be limited to administrative use only. Closing Additional Roads for Motorized Use Another aspect of the proposed action would involve the closure of certain roads within the Blue-Grass BMU. Bog Creek Road is located in the Blue-Grass BMU within the SRZ. This BMU area is currently not meeting Access Amendment standards for motorized access in a grizzly bear habitat. The Agencies anticipate that other roads within the Blue- Grass BMU area would need to be closed for motorized use under this proposed action. The road closures would be necessary to mitigate the potential impacts to grizzly bear habitats associated with the repair and subsequent use of Bog Creek Road and to allow the Forest Service to meet the Access Amendment standards and its statutory obligations under the ESA. Because there are limited options regarding roads to close for motorized use to meet the Access Amendment standards, the Agencies are working together to determine alternatives that would meet CBP's requirements for border access as well as the Forest Service's requirements to comply with the Access Amendment standards and the ESA. The Agencies have identified a preliminary list of roads that could be closed for motorized use. All of these roads are currently closed to public use and only open for limited administrative use. Roads that have been preliminarily identified for possible motorized closure include FR 2464 Upper, 2464 Lower, 1322, 1322A, 1013D, 1013C, 1388, 1388A, 2252, 636, and 2253. Approximately 26 miles of IPNF roads could be closed under the proposed action. As a part of the scoping process (discussed below), the Agencies are seeking further input on possible motorized road closure alternatives. Lead and Cooperating Agencies CBP and the Forest Service will work together as joint lead agencies on the EIS. Responsible Official The Executive Director, Facilities Management & Engineering, CBP, is the deciding official for CBP and the Forest Supervisor, IPNF, Forest Service, is the deciding official for the Forest Service. Public Scoping Process Public scoping for the Bog Creek Road repair and maintenance proposal was initially conducted by CBP in February and March of 2013. Information gathered from the previous scoping effort was used to inform the Agencies about what level of NEPA analysis was necessary to evaluate the proposed project. The initial scoping information included the possibility that road closures may become part of the proposed action, but did not include specific motorized road closure information. Using initial scoping information, the Agencies determined that the NEPA analysis would be conducted through an EIS process. All scoping comments submitted during the initial scoping will be included in issue development for the current EIS process. A Scoping Report that summarizes the initial scoping effort is available for review at http://www.cbp.gov/about/environmental-cultural-stewardship/nepa-documents/docs-review. This Notice of Intent (NOI) initiates the public scoping process which will guide the development of the EIS. All interested parties are invited to participate in the scoping process. CBP and the Forest Service invite agencies, organizations, and the general public to provide input to this process of scoping environmental issues for consideration in the EIS. Written comments may be submitted as described in the ADDRESSES section of this document. When submitting comments, please include your name and address. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will also be accepted and considered. After the public scoping period is complete and the Agencies have reviewed the results, a compilation list of comments will be included in an amendment to the initial Scoping Report (described above). The amended Scoping Report will be made available on the CBP public Web site: http://www.cbp.gov/about/environmental-cultural-stewardship/nepa-documents/docs-review. Public Involvement in Historic Preservation Activities Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108) requires Federal agencies to review all actions which may affect resources listed on, or eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places in order to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties, and to afford the Idaho State Historic Preservation Officer and tribal governments a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings. During the process of public scoping and preparation of the EIS, the Agencies seek to identify interested parties and obtain public comments on historic preservation issues related to the road repair and closure of roads for motorized use. Preliminary Issues Based upon the initial project scoping, some preliminary issues have been identified as potential effects of the proposed project. These include effects on:Border security; threatened and endangered species including grizzly bear, caribou, lynx, and bull trout; Blue-Grass BMU grizzly bear core habitat requirement; National Forest access; and biological resources including fisheries, wildlife, sensitive plants, and noxious weeds. Permits and Licenses Required The proposed project would likely require a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit. The Agencies will work with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine the necessary [[Page 24842]] permit process. All required permits would be obtained prior to project implementation. Next Steps In accordance with NEPA, the draft EIS will be made available to the public for review and comment through a Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register. The NOA will provide directions for obtaining copies of the draft EIS as well as dates and locations for any associated public participation meetings. After a public comment period on the draft EIS, CBP and the Forest Service will complete a final EIS. Dated: April 21, 2016. Karl H. Calvo, Executive Director, Facilities Management and Engineering, Office of Administration. Shanda Fallau Dekome, Acting Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, U.S. Forest Service. [FR Doc. 2016-09790 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices 24839
the value data element and eliminating fails to exercise reasonable care in the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
the HTS number requirement, will execution of participant obligations, or SECURITY
facilitate the in-transit manifest process otherwise fails to comply with all
for both the trade and CBP. Canadian applicable laws and regulations, then U.S. Customs and Border Protection
carriers will be able to route certain the participant may be suspended from
domestic shipments through the United participation in this test and/or DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
States with greater efficiency and CBP subjected to penalties, liquidated
will benefit from an entirely electronic damages, and/or other administrative or Forest Service
in-transit manifest. judicial sanction. Additionally, CBP has Notice of intent to prepare a Joint
B. Test Participants and Conditions of the right to suspend a test participant Environmental Impact Statement and
Participation based on a determination that an To Conduct Public Scoping
Participation in the In-Transit unacceptable compliance risk exists.
Any decision proposing suspension may AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Manifest Pilot Program is currently
be appealed in writing to the Assistant Protection, Department of Homeland
limited to nine Canadian truck carriers
Commissioner (Office of Field Security and Forest Service, USDA.
that have been selected by CBP in
consultation with the Canadian Border Operations) within 15 days of the ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
Services Agency (CBSA). Each decision date. Such proposed Joint Environmental Impact Statement
participating carrier is a bonded carrier suspension will apprise the participant concerning the repair and maintenance
and a certified member of the Customs- of the facts or conduct warranting of Bog Creek Road and closure of certain
Trade Partnership Against Terrorism suspension. Should the participant roads within the Blue-Grass Bear
(C–TPAT), a voluntary supply chain appeal the notice of proposed Management Unit in the Selkirk
security program led by CBP that is suspension, the participant should Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho;
focused on improving the security of address the facts or conduct charges request for comments; and notice of
private companies’ supply chains with contained in the notice and state how he public scoping.
respect to terrorism. As a condition of has or will achieve compliance. SUMMARY: This notice announces that
participation, each carrier must use However, in the case of willfulness or U.S. Customs and Border Protection
commercial drivers cleared under the where public health interests are (CBP) and the U.S. Forest Service
FAST program. FAST driver concerned, the suspension may be (Forest Service) Idaho Panhandle
identification provides CBP with a full effective immediately. National Forests (IPNF) (collectively the
set of identifying information regarding ‘‘Agencies’’) intend to prepare a joint
the driver, including the driver’s name, VI. Test Evaluation Criteria
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
date of birth, gender, citizenship, and to identify and assess potential impacts
address. Another condition of All interested parties are invited to
comment on any aspect of this test at upon the environment of: Repairing and
participation in this NCAP test is that maintaining an approximately 5.6-mile
no passengers are permitted on the any time. To ensure adequate feedback,
participants are required to take part in section of the existing Bog Creek Road,
Canadian trucks transiting the United which is located in the Selkirk
States, with the exception of additional an evaluation of this test. CBP needs
comments and feedback on all aspects Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho,
drivers also cleared under the FAST within approximately two miles of the
program. As provided in Section VI, of this test, including the design,
Canadian border, on land within the
participants are also required to take conduct and implementation of the test
Blue-Grass Bear Management Unit
part in an evaluation of the test. in order to determine whether to (BMU) that is managed by the IPNF; and
modify, alter, expand, limit, continue, closing for motorized use additional
C. Test Duration and Locations
end or implement this program by roads within the Blue-Grass BMU to
The NCAP test will be conducted for regulation. The final results of the
approximately six months from its start comply with the IPNF Forest Plan
evaluation will be published in the Amendments for Motorized Access
at the following ports of entry: Port Federal Register and the Customs
Huron, Michigan; Pembina, North Management within the Selkirk and
Bulletin as required by 19 CFR 101.9. Cabinet-Yaak Grizzly Bear Recovery
Dakota; and Blaine, Washington. Any
future expansion of this NCAP test to VII. Paperwork Reduction Act Zones (Access Amendment) and reduce
additional ports and/or extension of the road density in the Blue-Grass BMU.
time period will be announced on CBP’s As noted above, CBP is accepting only This notice initiates the public scoping
Web site at www.cbp.gov. Participants nine participants in the NCAP test. This process for the preparation of the EIS.
will also be notified of any expansion. means that fewer than ten persons will The purpose of the public scoping
be subject to any information collections process is to solicit public comments
IV. Regulatory Provisions Affected under the NCAP test. Accordingly, regarding the potential environmental
Regulations in 19 CFR parts 18 and collections of information encompassed impacts that may be addressed. This
123 that conflict with the terms and within this notice are exempted from notice commences the public scoping
conditions of the NCAP test are the requirements of the Paperwork period for which CBP and IPNF are
suspended and overridden to the extent Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3502 requesting written comments. This
process is being conducted pursuant to
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
of the conflict for the duration of the test and 3507).
for test participants and only to the the National Environmental Policy Act
extent of their participation in this test. Dated: April 22, 2016. (NEPA), the Council on Environmental
Todd Owen, Quality Regulations for Implementing
V. Misconduct the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field
If a test participant fails to abide by Operations. and CBP and Forest Service NEPA
the rules, procedures, or term and [FR Doc. 2016–09858 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am] guidelines. Additionally, pursuant to
conditions of this and all other BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Section 106 of the National Historic
applicable Federal Register notices, Preservation Act, the public scoping
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24920/page/1.svg)
![24842 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices
permit process. All required permits or to show evidence of having in effect used to meet the floodplain
would be obtained prior to project in order to qualify or remain qualified management requirements of the NFIP
implementation. for participation in the National Flood and also are used to calculate the
Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, appropriate flood insurance premium
Next Steps
the FIRM and FIS report, once effective, rates for new buildings built after the
In accordance with NEPA, the draft will be used by insurance agents and FIRM and FIS report become effective.
EIS will be made available to the public others to calculate appropriate flood The communities affected by the
for review and comment through a insurance premium rates for new flood hazard determinations are
Notice of Availability (NOA) in the buildings and the contents of those provided in the tables below. Any
Federal Register. The NOA will provide buildings. request for reconsideration of the
directions for obtaining copies of the revised flood hazard information shown
DATES: Comments are to be submitted
draft EIS as well as dates and locations on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS report
on or before July 26, 2016.
for any associated public participation that satisfies the data requirements
ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and
meetings. After a public comment outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b) is considered
period on the draft EIS, CBP and the where applicable, the FIS report for
each community are available for an appeal. Comments unrelated to the
Forest Service will complete a final EIS. flood hazard determinations also will be
inspection at both the online location
Dated: April 21, 2016. and the respective Community Map considered before the FIRM and FIS
Karl H. Calvo, Repository address listed in the tables report become effective.
Executive Director, Facilities Management below. Additionally, the current Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel
and Engineering, Office of Administration. effective FIRM and FIS report for each (SRP) is available to communities in
Shanda Fallau Dekome, community are accessible online support of the appeal resolution
Acting Forest Supervisor, Idaho Panhandle through the FEMA Map Service Center process. SRPs are independent panels of
National Forests, U.S. Forest Service. at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison. experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and
[FR Doc. 2016–09790 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am] You may submit comments, identified other pertinent sciences established to
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P by Docket No. FEMA–B–1610, to Rick review conflicting scientific and
Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services technical data and provide
Branch, Federal Insurance and recommendations for resolution. Use of
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 the SRP only may be exercised after
SECURITY C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, FEMA and local communities have been
(202) 646–7659, or (email) engaged in a collaborative consultation
Federal Emergency Management patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov. process for at least 60 days without a
Agency FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick mutually acceptable resolution of an
[Docket ID FEMA–2016–0002; Internal Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services appeal. Additional information
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1610] Branch, Federal Insurance and regarding the SRP process can be found
Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_
Proposed Flood Hazard C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, fact_sheet.pdf.
Determinations (202) 646–7659, or (email) The watersheds and/or communities
patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov; or visit affected are listed in the tables below.
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
the FEMA Map Information eXchange The Preliminary FIRM, and where
Management Agency, DHS.
(FMIX) online at applicable, FIS report for each
ACTION: Notice.
www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_ community are available for inspection
SUMMARY: Comments are requested on main.html. at both the online location and the
proposed flood hazard determinations, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA respective Community Map Repository
which may include additions or proposes to make flood hazard address listed in the tables. For
modifications of any Base Flood determinations for each community communities with multiple ongoing
Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, listed below, in accordance with section Preliminary studies, the studies can be
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act identified by the unique project number
boundary or zone designation, or of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR and Preliminary FIRM date listed in the
regulatory floodway on the Flood 67.4(a). tables. Additionally, the current
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and These proposed flood hazard effective FIRM and FIS report for each
where applicable, in the supporting determinations, together with the community are accessible online
Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for floodplain management criteria required through the FEMA Map Service Center
the communities listed in the table by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
below. The purpose of this notice is to are required. They should not be (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
seek general information and comment construed to mean that the community 97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
regarding the preliminary FIRM, and must change any existing ordinances
where applicable, the FIS report that the that are more stringent in their Dated: April 12, 2016.
Federal Emergency Management Agency floodplain management requirements. Roy E. Wright,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(FEMA) has provided to the affected The community may at any time enact Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance
communities. The FIRM and FIS report stricter requirements of its own or and Mitigation, Department of Homeland
are the basis of the floodplain pursuant to policies established by other Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
management measures that the Federal, State, or regional entities.
community is required either to adopt These flood hazard determinations are I. Watershed-based studies:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24920/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:55:39
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:55:39
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of intent to prepare a Joint Environmental Impact Statement concerning the repair and maintenance of Bog Creek Road and closure of certain roads within the Blue-Grass Bear Management Unit in the Selkirk Mountains in Boundary County, Idaho; request for comments; and notice of public scoping. | |
| Dates | The scoping comment period will be 30 days. To ensure consideration, comments must be received by May 27, 2016. | |
| Contact | Paul Enriquez, CBP, Border Patrol Facilities & Tactical Infrastructure Program Management Office, by telephone at (949) 643-6365, or by email at [email protected] You may also visit the CBP public Web site for more information at: http://www.cbp.gov/about/environmental-cultural-stewardship/nepa- documents/docs-review. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 24839 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR