81 FR 24903 - New Postal Product

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)

Page Range		24903-24904
FR Document		2016-09735

The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing concerning the addition of Priority Mail Contract 208 to the competitive product list. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24903-24904]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. MC2016-123 and CP2016-156; Order No. 3255]


New Postal Product

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing 
concerning the addition of Priority Mail Contract 208 to the 
competitive product list. This notice informs the public of the filing, 
invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

DATES: Comments are due: April 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at http://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments 
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing 
alternatives.

[[Page 24904]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Notice of Commission Action
III. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30-.35, the 
Postal Service filed a formal request and associated supporting 
information to add Priority Mail Contract 208 to the competitive 
product list.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority 
Mail Contract 208 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing 
(Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors' Decision, Contract, and 
Supporting Data, April 20, 2016 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract 
related to the proposed new product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 
CFR 3015.5. Request, Attachment B.
    To support its Request, the Postal Service filed a copy of the 
contract, a copy of the Governors' Decision authorizing the product, 
proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule, a Statement of 
Supporting Justification, a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 
3633(a), and an application for non-public treatment of certain 
materials. It also filed supporting financial workpapers.

II. Notice of Commission Action

    The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2016-123 and CP2016-156 to 
consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 
208 product and the related contract, respectively.
    The Commission invites comments on whether the Postal Service's 
filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the policies of 39 
U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 CFR part 3020, 
subpart B. Comments are due no later than April 28, 2016. The public 
portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission's Web site 
(http://www.prc.gov).
    The Commission appoints Christopher C. Mohr to serve as Public 
Representative in these dockets.

III. Ordering Paragraphs

    It is ordered:
    1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2016-123 and CP2016-156 
to consider the matters raised in each docket.
    2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Christopher C. Mohr is appointed to 
serve as an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the 
general public in these proceedings (Public Representative).
    3. Comments are due no later than April 28, 2016.
    4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the 
Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-09735 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices 24903

probability or consequences of an impose any new or different operating has essentially the same properties as
accident previously evaluated? requirements. The core monitoring the currently used Zircaloy cladding.
The proposed changes for PSL–2 system remains unchanged. The use of the M5® fuel rod cladding
revise TS 5.3.1 to include M5® cladding, Therefore, the proposed change does material will not significantly increase
delete the linear heat rate surveillance not create the possibility of a new or individual occupational radiation
requirement with W(z) in TS 4.2.1.3, different kind of accident from any exposure, or significantly increase
and include previously approved accident previously evaluated. cumulative occupational radiation
AREVA topical reports in the list of 3. Does the proposed exemption exposure. Therefore, the provisions of
COLR methodologies in TS 6.9.1.11. involve a significant reduction in a 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(iii) are satisfied.
[Another] change is in TS License margin of safety?
Condition 3.N, which is related to future The changes proposed in this IV. Conclusions
analysis of the current fuel and is exemption are related to the fuel design Accordingly, the Commission has
considered an administrative change, all with M5® cladding and the determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
as a result of changing the fuel supplier. methodology supporting the analysis of 50.12, the exemption is authorized by
The fuel assembly design is not an accidents impacted by the fuel design law, will not present an undue risk to
initiator to any accident previously change. The analysis methods used are the public health and safety, and is
evaluated. Therefore, there is no previously approved by the NRC for consistent with the common defense
significant increase in the probability of similar applications. The change to the and security. Also, special
any accident previously evaluated. surveillance requirement for the linear circumstances, as required by 10 CFR
However, the fuel design parameters heat rate does not change any accident 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present. Therefore,
and the correlations used in the analysis requirements. The fuel design the Commission hereby grants the
analyses supporting the operation of limits related to the DNBR [departure licensee an exemption from the
PSL–2 with the new proposed AREVA from nucleate boiling ratio] and fuel requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and
fuel are dependent on the fuel assembly centerline melt remain consistent with Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50, to allow
design. All the analyses, potentially the limits previously approved for the the use of M5® fuel rod cladding
impacted by the fuel design, have been proposed fuel design change. The material at PSL–2.
re-analyzed using the correlations and overpressure limits for the reactor This exemption is effective upon
the methodology applicable to the coolant system integrity and the issuance.
proposed fuel design and previously containment integrity remain
approved by the NRC for similar Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th of
unchanged. All of the analyses April, 2016.
applications. There are no changes to performed to support the fuel design
any limits specified in the TSs. M5® For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
change meet all applicable acceptance
cladding to be used in the proposed Anne T. Boland,
criteria. The LOCA analyses, with the
AREVA fuel design has been previously peak linear heat rate limit increase, Director, Division of Operating Reactor
approved by the NRC for PWR Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
continue to meet all of the applicable 10 Regulation.
applications, including the St. Lucie CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria, and thus
Plant, Unit No. 1. The core design [FR Doc. 2016–09851 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
the proposed changes do not affect
peaking factors remain unchanged from margin of safety for any accidents BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
the current analyses values, except for previously evaluated.
the large break LOCA, which is shown Therefore, the proposed changes do
to meet all the 10 CFR 50.46 criteria not involve a significant reduction in a
with the increased peak linear heat rate POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
margin of safety.
limit. Based on the above, the NRC staff
Therefore, the proposed changes do concludes that the proposed exemption [Docket Nos. MC2016–123 and CP2016–156;
not involve a significant increase in the presents no significant hazards Order No. 3255]
probability or consequences of an consideration under the standards set
accident previously evaluated. New Postal Product
forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and,
2. Does the proposed exemption accordingly, a finding of no significant AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
create the possibility of a new or hazards consideration is justified.
different kind of accident from any ACTION: Notice.
accident previously evaluated? Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(ii)
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
No new or different accidents result The proposed exemption would allow recent Postal Service filing concerning
from utilizing the proposed AREVA CE the use of M5® fuel rod cladding the addition of Priority Mail Contract
[Combustion Engineering] 16x16 fuel material in the PSL–2 reactor. M5® has 208 to the competitive product list. This
design [and M5® cladding]. Other than essentially the same properties as the notice informs the public of the filing,
the fuel design change, the proposed currently licensed Zircaloy fuel rod invites public comment, and takes other
exemption does not involve a physical cladding. The use of the M5® fuel rod administrative steps.
alteration of the plant or plant systems cladding material will not significantly DATES: Comments are due: April 28,
(i.e., no new or different type of change the types of effluents that may
equipment will be installed which 2016.
be released offsite, or significantly
would create a new or different kind of ADDRESSES: Submit comments
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

increase the amount of effluents that
accident). The change to the linear heat may be released offsite. Therefore, the electronically via the Commission’s
rate surveillance requirement, when provisions of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(ii) are Filing Online system at http://
operating on excore detector monitoring satisfied. www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
system, and the use of M5® cladding do comments electronically should contact
not affect or create any accident Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(iii) the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
initiator. There is no change to the The proposed exemption would allow INFORMATION CONTACT section by
methods governing normal plant the use of the M5® fuel rod cladding telephone for advice on filing
operation and the changes do not material in the PSL–2 reactor core. M5® alternatives.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1

24904 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: accessed via the Commission’s Web site estimate of the burden of the collection
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at (http://www.prc.gov). of the information; (c) ways to enhance
202–789–6820. The Commission appoints the quality, utility, and clarity of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Christopher C. Mohr to serve as Public information to be collected; and (d)
Representative in these dockets. ways to minimize the burden related to
Table of Contents the collection of information on
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction respondents, including the use of
II. Notice of Commission Action It is ordered: automated collection techniques or
III. Ordering Paragraphs 1. The Commission establishes Docket other forms of information technology.
Nos. MC2016–123 and CP2016–156 to 1. Title and purpose of information
I. Introduction consider the matters raised in each collection: Evidence of Marital
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 docket. Relationship, Living with Requirements;
and 39 CFR 3020.30-.35, the Postal 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, OMB 3220–0021.
Service filed a formal request and Christopher C. Mohr is appointed to To support an application for a
associated supporting information to serve as an officer of the Commission to spouse or widow(er)’s annuity under
add Priority Mail Contract 208 to the represent the interests of the general Sections 2(c) or 2(d) of the Railroad
competitive product list.1 public in these proceedings (Public Retirement Act, an applicant must
The Postal Service Representative). submit proof of a valid marriage to a
contemporaneously filed a redacted 3. Comments are due no later than railroad employee. In some cases, the
contract related to the proposed new April 28, 2016. existence of a marital relationship is not
product under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 4. The Secretary shall arrange for formalized by a civil or religious
39 CFR 3015.5. Request, Attachment B. publication of this order in the Federal ceremony. In other cases, questions may
To support its Request, the Postal Register. arise about the legal termination of a
Service filed a copy of the contract, a By the Commission. prior marriage of the employee, spouse,
copy of the Governors’ Decision Stacy L. Ruble, or widow(er). In these instances, the
authorizing the product, proposed Secretary. RRB must secure additional information
changes to the Mail Classification [FR Doc. 2016–09735 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
to resolve questionable marital
Schedule, a Statement of Supporting relationships. The circumstances
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
Justification, a certification of requiring an applicant to submit
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), and documentary evidence of marriage are
an application for non-public treatment prescribed in 20 CFR 219.30.
of certain materials. It also filed RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD In the absence of documentary
supporting financial workpapers. Proposed Collection; Comment evidence, the RRB needs to determine if
Request a valid marriage existed between a
II. Notice of Commission Action
spouse or widow(er) annuity applicant
The Commission establishes Docket Summary: In accordance with the and a railroad employee. The RRB
Nos. MC2016–123 and CP2016–156 to requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of utilizes Forms G–124, Individual
consider the Request pertaining to the the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement of Marital Relationship; G–
proposed Priority Mail Contract 208 which provides opportunity for public 124a, Certification of Marriage
product and the related contract, comment on new or revised data Information; G–237, Statement
respectively. collections, the Railroad Retirement Regarding Marital Status; G–238,
The Commission invites comments on Board (RRB) will publish periodic Statement of Residence; and G–238a,
whether the Postal Service’s filings in summaries of proposed data collections. Statement Regarding Divorce or
the captioned dockets are consistent Comments are invited on: (a) Whether Annulment, to secure the needed
with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, the proposed information collection is information. One response is requested
3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 necessary for the proper performance of of each respondent. Completion is
CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comments are the functions of the agency, including required to obtain benefits. The RRB
due no later than April 28, 2016. The whether the information has practical proposes minor non-burden impacting
public portions of these filings can be utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s changes to the forms in the collection.

ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN
Annual Time Burden
Form number responses (minutes) (hours)

G–124 (in person) ........................................................................................................................ 125 15 31
G–124 (by mail) ........................................................................................................................... 75 20 25
G–124a ........................................................................................................................................ 300 10 50
G–237 (in person) ........................................................................................................................ 75 15 19
G–237 (by mail) ........................................................................................................................... 75 20 25
G–238 (in person) ........................................................................................................................ 150 3 8
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

G–238 (by mail) ........................................................................................................................... 150 5 13
G–238a ........................................................................................................................................ 150 10 25

Total ...................................................................................................................................... 1,100 196
* Forms G–124, G–237, G–238, and G–238a can be completed either with assistance from RRB personnel during an in-office interview or by
mail.

1 Request of the United States Postal Service to Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Add Priority Mail Contract 208 to Competitive Supporting Data, April 20, 2016 (Request).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1

Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:55:49
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:55:49

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Dates		Comments are due: April 28, 2016.
Contact		David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.
FR Citation		81 FR 24903