81 FR 24913 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Establish Procedures for the Allocation of Cages to Co-Located Users, Including the Waiver of Certain Fees, and To Amend the Visitor Security Escort Fee
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 24913-24915 | |
| FR Document | 2016-09725 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 24913-24915] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-09725] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-77682; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2016-21] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Establish Procedures for the Allocation of Cages to Co-Located Users, Including the Waiver of Certain Fees, and To Amend the Visitor Security Escort Fee April 21, 2016. I. Introduction On February 23, 2016 NYSE Arca, Inc. (``the Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to establish procedures for the allocation of cages to co-located Users, including the waiver of certain fees, and to amend the visitor security escort fee. On March 1, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 11, 2016.\3\ There were no comments on the proposed rule change.\4\ This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-77303 (March 7, 2016), 81 FR 13003 (``Notice''). Amendment No.1 was included in the Notice and provided certain clarifications, including that the proposed waiver of fees for two bundles of 24 cross connects, applicable while a User is on the waitlist, would only apply to cross-connects used to connect an individual User's non-contiguous cabinets. \4\ The Commission notes that it received one letter referencing this filing that addresses issues outside the scope of this proposal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Background and Description of the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 The Exchange proposes to establish procedures for the allocation of cages to its co-located Users,\5\ including the waiver of certain fees subject to specified conditions, and to amend the visitor security escort fee.\6\ The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services (``Schedule of Fees'') and the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') to reflect the changes.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a ``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co- location services directly from the Exchange. The Exchange provides co-location services to Users from its data center (``Data Center'') in Mahwah, New Jersey. \6\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13003. \7\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As more fully set forth in the Notice, the Exchange offers Users the ability to rent cages to house their cabinets in the Data Center,\8\ and historically has offered these cages on a first come/ first serve basis.\9\ The Exchange states that a cage typically is purchased by a User that has several cabinets within Data Center and wishes to arrange its cabinets contiguously while also enhancing privacy around its cabinets.\10\ The Exchange offers three cage sizes, corresponding to the number of cabinets housed therein, and charges fees for the cages based on the size.\11\ The physical footprint of each cage is greater than that of the cabinets that it houses, as each cage is constructed so as to include aisles around the purchasing User's cabinets, for accessibility and to comply with safety regulations.\12\ In order to offer the cages, the Exchange must have sufficient contiguous open space available for the cage.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See id. A User must have at least two cabinets in the Data Center to purchase a cage. See id. \9\ See id. \10\ See id. \11\ See id. \12\ See id. \13\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13003-13004. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 2015, the Exchange determined that to continue to be able to meet its obligation to accommodate demand, and in particular to make available more contiguous, larger spaces for new and existing Users, it would exercise its right to move some Users' equipment within the Data Center (the ``Migration'').\14\ The Exchange established procedures to manage the Migration process, and [[Page 24914]] continues to implement them.\15\ The Exchange states that, notwithstanding the Migration, contiguous open space will still be limited, and may become more limited over time.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13004; see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76269 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66947 (October 30, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-42); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76268 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944 (October 30, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015- 70); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76270 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944 (October 30, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-85) (collectively ``Migration Filing''). \15\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13004; see also Migration Filing supra note 14. \16\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13004. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Cage Allocation Procedure The Exchange has proposed to establish procedures governing the allocation of cages should the currently available open contiguous space in the Data Center be insufficient to house a new cage or if the open contiguous space available is sufficiently limited such that the Exchange cannot both provide new cages and satisfy all User demand for other co-location services.\17\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes that it will place Users seeking new cages on a waitlist: (1) The order of Users on the list will be based on the date the Exchange receives signed orders for the cages from each User; (2) once the list is established, Users, on a rolling basis, will be allocated a cage each time one becomes available; (3) if a cage becomes available and the User that is at the top of the waitlist turns it down because it requested a different size, that User will remain on the waitlist and the cage will be offered to the next User on the list, in order, until a User accepts it; (4) a User that turns down a cage that is the size that it requested will be removed from the waitlist; and (5) if a User requests two cages, that User will be moved to the bottom of the waitlist upon the receipt of its first cage.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See id. \18\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In connection with the proposed waitlist procedures, the Exchange further proposes to add General Note 3 to the Schedule of Fees and Fee Schedule,\19\ to provide that the Exchange would, subject to specified conditions, waive the initial and monthly fee for two bundles of 24 cross connects between a User's non-contiguous cabinets while it is on the waitlist.\20\ Specifically, the initial and monthly charge for two bundles of 24 cross connects will be waived for a User that is waitlisted for a cage for the duration of the waitlist period, provided that the cross connects may only be used to connect the User's non- contiguous cabinets.\21\ The charge will no longer be waived once a User is removed from the waitlist.\22\ In addition, a User that is removed from the waitlist but subsequently requests a cage will be added back to the bottom of the waitlist, provided that, if the User was removed from the waitlist because it turned down a cage that is the size that it requested, it will not receive a second waiver of the charge.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See id. \20\ See id. \21\ See id. \22\ As noted above, a User that turns down a cage because it is not the correct size will remain on the waitlist. A User that requests to be removed or that turns down a cage that is the size that it requested will be removed from the waitlist. See supra note 18 and accompanying text. \23\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13004. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Visitor Security Escorts The Exchange also proposes to amend its visitor security escort fee. Currently, a User visiting its cabinet(s) in the Data Center is required to pay a $75/hour fee for a security escort.\24\ The Exchange proposes to eliminate this fee for Users visiting their own cage in the Data Center,\25\ and change the fee for those not visiting their own cage from $75/hour to $75/visit.\26\ The Exchange states that a security escort is not needed when a User visits its own cage because that User would have access only to its own cabinets locked within its own cage,\27\ and that User will not have access to the cabinets of other Users or Exchange equipment, which are locked as well.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13005. \25\ See id. The Exchange is also making a technical change to the visitor fee on the Schedule of Fees and Fee Schedule to add clarity. See id. \26\ See id. The Exchange stated that many of the escorted visits lasted an hour or less. See id. \27\ See Notice, 81 FR at 13004. \28\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review and consideration of the Exchange's proposal, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\29\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\30\ which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities, and with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\31\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ In approving this proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the proposed procedures for the allocation of cages to its co-located Users and associated waiver of fees subject to specified conditions are consistent with Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act. In particular, the Commission believes that the proposed cage allocation and waitlist procedures are reasonably designed to assist the Exchange in offering cages to current and future Users in the Data Center on terms that are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory in the event that available open contiguous space in the Data Center is not sufficient to house a newly requested cage or sufficiently limited that the Exchange cannot both provide new cages and satisfy all User demand for other co-location services. The Commission further believes that the proposal to waive the initial and monthly fee for two bundles of 24 cross connects between a User's non- contiguous cabinets while a User is on the waitlist is consistent with the Act. Users can qualify for the fee waiver by requesting a cage and being placed on the waitlist until a cage becomes available to them. Once the Exchange offers the requested size cage to a User through the allocation procedure or when a User is removed from the waitlist, the fee would no longer be waived. In addition, if a User was removed from the waitlist because it turned down a cage that was the size that it requested, it would not receive a second waiver of the charge. The Commission believes that the proposed fee waiver and associated conditions are reasonably designed to alleviate the inconvenience for waitlisted Users of having cabinets in non-contiguous spaces by removing the cost that those Users would otherwise avoid if a cage were available. The Commission also finds the proposed amendments to the visitor security escort fee consistent with Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act. The Exchange represents that a security escort is not needed when a User visits its own cage because that User would have access only to its own cabinets locked within its own cage,\32\ and will not have access to the cabinets of other Users or Exchange equipment, which [[Page 24915]] are locked as well.\33\ In addition, the proposed rate of $75/visit for the visitor security escort would be a fee reduction for any visit that lasted more than an hour, and so it would reduce the burden placed on Users that remain subject to the fee. Therefore, the Commission finds the proposed amendments to the visitor security escort fee to be reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ See supra notes 27-28 and accompanying text. \33\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. VII. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\34\ that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No.1, (File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2016-21) be, and hereby is, approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-09725 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices 24913
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in All submissions should refer to File its co-located Users,5 including the
the public interest; (ii) for the protection Number SR–Phlx–2016–51 and should waiver of certain fees subject to
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in be submitted on or before May 18, 2016. specified conditions, and to amend the
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. For the Commission, by the Division of visitor security escort fee.6 The
If the Commission takes such action, the Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE
Commission shall institute proceedings authority.39 Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and
to determine whether the proposed rule Brent J. Fields, Charges for Exchange Services
should be approved or disapproved. Secretary. (‘‘Schedule of Fees’’) and the NYSE
IV. Solicitation of Comments [FR Doc. 2016–09716 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am] Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Schedule’’) to reflect the changes.7
Interested persons are invited to As more fully set forth in the Notice,
submit written data, views, and the Exchange offers Users the ability to
arguments concerning the foregoing, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE rent cages to house their cabinets in the
including whether the proposed rule COMMISSION Data Center,8 and historically has
change is consistent with the Act.
[Release No. 34–77682; File No. SR– offered these cages on a first come/first
Comments may be submitted by any of NYSEARCA–2016–21] serve basis.9 The Exchange states that a
the following methods:
cage typically is purchased by a User
Electronic Comments Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE that has several cabinets within
Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
• Use the Commission’s Internet Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Data Center and wishes to arrange its
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Amendment No. 1, To Establish cabinets contiguously while also
rules/sro.shtml); or Procedures for the Allocation of Cages enhancing privacy around its cabinets.10
The Exchange offers three cage sizes,
• Send an email to rule-comments@ to Co-Located Users, Including the
Waiver of Certain Fees, and To Amend corresponding to the number of cabinets
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
the Visitor Security Escort Fee housed therein, and charges fees for the
Phlx–2016–51 on the subject line.
cages based on the size.11 The physical
Paper Comments April 21, 2016. footprint of each cage is greater than
I. Introduction that of the cabinets that it houses, as
• Send paper comments in triplicate each cage is constructed so as to include
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange On February 23, 2016 NYSE Arca, Inc. aisles around the purchasing User’s
Commission, 100 F Street NE., (‘‘the Exchange’’) filed with the cabinets, for accessibility and to comply
Washington, DC 20549–1090. Securities and Exchange Commission with safety regulations.12 In order to
All submissions should refer to File (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section offer the cages, the Exchange must have
Number SR–Phlx–2016–51. This file 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act sufficient contiguous open space
number should be included on the of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 available for the cage.13
subject line if email is used. To help the thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
establish procedures for the allocation In 2015, the Exchange determined
Commission process and review your that to continue to be able to meet its
comments more efficiently, please use of cages to co-located Users, including
the waiver of certain fees, and to amend obligation to accommodate demand, and
only one method. The Commission will in particular to make available more
post all comments on the Commission’s the visitor security escort fee. On March
1, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment contiguous, larger spaces for new and
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The existing Users, it would exercise its
rules/sro.shtml).
proposed rule change, as modified by right to move some Users’ equipment
Copies of the submission, all within the
Amendment No. 1, was published for
subsequent amendments, all written
comment in the Federal Register on Data Center (the ‘‘Migration’’).14 The
statements with respect to the proposed
March 11, 2016.3 There were no Exchange established procedures to
rule change that are filed with the
comments on the proposed rule manage the Migration process, and
Commission, and all written
change.4 This order approves the
communications relating to the
proposed rule change, as modified by 5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
proposed rule change between the services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant
Amendment No. 1.
Commission and any person, other than that requests to receive co-location services directly
those that may be withheld from the II. Background and Description of the from the Exchange. The Exchange provides co-
public in accordance with the Proposal, as Modified by Amendment location services to Users from its data center
(‘‘Data Center’’) in Mahwah, New Jersey.
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be No. 1 6 See Notice, 81 FR at 13003.
available for Web site viewing and The Exchange proposes to establish 7 See id.
printing in the Commission’s Public procedures for the allocation of cages to 8 See id. A User must have at least two cabinets
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., in the Data Center to purchase a cage. See id.
Washington, DC 20549, on official 39 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
9 See id.
business days between the hours of 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
10 See id.
11 See id.
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
12 See id.
filing also will be available for 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13 See Notice, 81 FR at 13003–13004.
inspection and copying at the principal 77303 (March 7, 2016), 81 FR 13003 (‘‘Notice’’).
Amendment No.1 was included in the Notice and 14 See Notice, 81 FR at 13004; see also Securities
office of the Exchange. All comments provided certain clarifications, including that the Exchange Act Release No. 76269 (October 26, 2015),
received will be posted without change; proposed waiver of fees for two bundles of 24 cross 80 FR 66947 (October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–
the Commission does not edit personal connects, applicable while a User is on the waitlist, 42); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76268
identifying information from would only apply to cross-connects used to connect (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944 (October 30, 2015)
an individual User’s non-contiguous cabinets. (SR–NYSEMKT–2015–70); Securities Exchange Act
submissions. You should submit only 4 The Commission notes that it received one letter Release No. 76270 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944
information that you wish to make referencing this filing that addresses issues outside (October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–85)
available publicly. the scope of this proposal. (collectively ‘‘Migration Filing’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24994/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices 24915
are locked as well.33 In addition, the change. The proposed rule change, as in particular to make available more
proposed rate of $75/visit for the visitor modified by Amendment No. 1, was contiguous, larger spaces for new and
security escort would be a fee reduction published for comment in the Federal existing Users, it would exercise its
for any visit that lasted more than an Register on March 11, 2016.3 There right to move some Users’ equipment
hour, and so it would reduce the burden were no comments on the proposed rule within the Data Center (the
placed on Users that remain subject to change. This order approves the ‘‘Migration’’).13 The Exchange
the fee. Therefore, the Commission finds proposed rule change, as modified by established procedures to manage the
the proposed amendments to the visitor Amendment No. 1. Migration process, and continues to
security escort fee to be reasonable, implement them.14 The Exchange states
II. Background and Description of the that, notwithstanding the Migration,
equitable, and not unfairly
Proposal, as Modified by Amendment contiguous open space will still be
discriminatory.
For the foregoing reasons, the No. 1 limited, and may become more limited
Commission finds that the proposed The Exchange proposes to establish over time.15
rule change, as modified by Amendment procedures for the allocation of cages to
Proposed Cage Allocation Procedure
No. 1, is consistent with the Act. its co-located Users,4 including the
waiver of certain fees subject to The Exchange has proposed to
VII. Conclusion specified conditions, and to amend the establish procedures governing the
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to visitor security escort fee.5 The allocation of cages should the currently
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,34 that the Exchange proposes to amend its Price available open contiguous space in the
proposed rule change, as modified by List (‘‘Price List’’) to reflect the Data Center be insufficient to house a
Amendment No.1, (File No. SR– changes.6 new cage or if the open contiguous
NYSEARCA–2016–21) be, and hereby As more fully set forth in the Notice, space available is sufficiently limited
is, approved. the Exchange offers Users the ability to such that the Exchange cannot both
For the Commission, by the Division of rent cages to house their cabinets in the provide new cages and satisfy all User
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Data Center,7 and historically has demand for other co-location services.16
authority.35 offered these cages on a first come/first Specifically, the Exchange proposes that
Brent J. Fields, serve basis.8 The Exchange states that a it will place Users seeking new cages on
Secretary. cage typically is purchased by a User a waitlist: (1) The order of Users on the
that has several cabinets within the Data list will be based on the date the
[FR Doc. 2016–09725 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
Center and wishes to arrange its Exchange receives signed orders for the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
cabinets contiguously while also cages from each User; (2) once the list
enhancing privacy around its cabinets.9 is established, Users, on a rolling basis,
The Exchange offers three cage sizes, will be allocated a cage each time one
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
corresponding to the number of cabinets becomes available; (3) if a cage becomes
COMMISSION
housed therein, and charges fees for the available and the User that is at the top
[Release No. 34–77681; File No. SR–NYSE– cages based on the size.10 The physical of the waitlist turns it down because it
2016–13] footprint of each cage is greater than requested a different size, that User will
that of the cabinets that it houses, as remain on the waitlist and the cage will
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New be offered to the next User on the list,
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order each cage is constructed so as to include
aisles around the purchasing User’s in order, until a User accepts it; (4) a
Approving a Proposed Rule Change, User that turns down a cage that is the
as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To cabinets, for accessibility and to comply
with safety regulations.11 In order to size that it requested will be removed
Establish Procedures for the from the waitlist; and (5) if a User
Allocation of Cages to Co-Located offer the cages, the Exchange must have
sufficient contiguous open space requests two cages, that User will be
Users, Including the Waiver of Certain moved to the bottom of the waitlist
Fees, and To Amend the Visitor available for the cage.12
In 2015, the Exchange determined upon the receipt of its first cage.17
Security Escort Fee In connection with the proposed
that to continue to be able to meet its
April 21, 2016. obligation to accommodate demand, and waitlist procedures, the Exchange
further proposes to add General Note 3
I. Introduction 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– to the Price List,18 to provide that the
On February 23, 2016 New York Stock 77302 (March 7, 2016), 81 FR 12998 (‘‘Notice’’). Exchange would, subject to specified
Amendment No.1 was included in the Notice and conditions, waive the initial and
Exchange LLC (‘‘the Exchange’’) filed provided certain clarifications, including that the
with the Securities and Exchange proposed waiver of fees for two bundles of 24 cross monthly fee for two bundles of 24 cross
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant connects, applicable while a User is on the waitlist, connects between a User’s non-
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities would only apply to cross-connects used to connect contiguous cabinets while it is on the
an individual User’s non-contiguous cabinets.
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 4 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
13 See id.; see also Securities Exchange Act
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant Release No. 76269 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66947
change to establish procedures for the that requests to receive co-location services directly (October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–42); Securities
allocation of cages to co-located Users, from the Exchange. The Exchange provides co- Exchange Act Release No. 76268 (October 26, 2015),
including the waiver of certain fees, and location services to Users from its data center 80 FR 66944 (October 30, 2015) (SR–NYSEMKT–
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(‘‘Data Center’’) in Mahwah, New Jersey. 2015–70); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
to amend the visitor security escort fee. 5 See Notice, 81 FR at 12999.
76270 (October 26, 2015), 80 FR 66944 (October 30,
On March 1, 2016, the Exchange filed 6 See id.
2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–85) (collectively
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule 7 See id. A User must have at least two cabinets ‘‘Migration Filing’’).
in the Data Center to purchase a cage. See id. 14 See Notice, 81 FR at 12999; see also Migration
33 See id. 8 See id. Filing supra note 13.
34 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 9 See id. 15 See Notice, 81 FR at 12999.
35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 10 See id. 16 See id.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 11 See id. 17 See id.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 12 See id. 18 See Notice, 81 FR at 13000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_24994/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:55:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:55:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 24913 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR