81 FR 24930 - Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee-New Task
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 81 (April 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 24930-24932 | |
| FR Document | 2016-09781 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 24930-24932] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-09781] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee--New Task AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of a new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) a new task to provide recommendations regarding bird strike protection rulemaking, policy, and guidance for normal category rotorcraft and to provide recommendations to enhance the existing bird strike protection standards for transport category rotorcraft. The FAA amended its regulations to incorporate bird strike protection rules for transport category rotorcraft in 1996. Data shows an increase in the bird population and weight has resulted in an increase in bird strikes with both normal category rotorcraft and transport category rotorcraft. The increase in bird strikes has led to more frequent bird penetration into the cockpit and cabin areas, elevating the risk of potential serious injuries or fatalities to occupants. Direct bird impact to the pilot has led to partial or complete pilot incapacitation in numerous cases, increasing the risk of fatalities. This notice informs the public of the new ARAC activity and solicits membership for the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary B. Roach, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177, [email protected], phone number 817-222-5110, facsimile number 817- 222-5961. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ARAC Acceptance of Task As a result of the March 23, 2016, ARAC meeting, the FAA assigned and ARAC accepted this task establishing the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group. The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group will serve as staff to the ARAC and provide advice and recommendations on the assigned task. The ARAC will review and accept the recommendation report and will submit it to the FAA. Background The FAA established the ARAC to provide information, advice, and recommendations on aviation-related [[Page 24931]] issues that could result in rulemaking, to the FAA Administrator, through the Associate Administrator of Aviation Safety. In 1996, a bird strike protection rule (14 CFR 29.631) was adopted requiring that transport category rotorcraft be designed to ensure continued safe flight and landing (for Category A) or safe landing (for Category B) following an impact with a 2.2-pound bird. At that time, bird strike protection was not adopted for normal category rotorcraft. As of 2015, normal category rotorcraft comprise over 90% of rotorcraft operating in the U.S. The data from the FAA's Wildlife Strike Database indicates about 75% of reported bird strikes from 1990-2013 were with normal category rotorcraft. These percentages suggest that the absence of bird strike protective requirements for normal category rotorcraft results in increased risk for the majority of U.S. rotorcraft. Further analysis of rotorcraft data from the FAA's Wildlife Strike Database indicates a 68% increase in bird strikes since 2009 and more than a 700% increase since the early 2000s. In raw numbers, the percentages translate from around 25 reports of rotorcraft bird strikes per year in the early 2000s, to 121 strikes in 2009, to 204 strikes in 2013. Using rotorcraft flight hours to perform a rate-based analysis, reported bird strikes increased 49% in the five year period from 2010 to 2014 (3.99 per 100,000 flight hours to 5.95 per 100,000 flight hours). Better event reporting accounts for some of this increase, but the rapid escalation goes beyond reporting improvements alone. One conjecture is the increase may be caused by the growing population of birds in general, a growing population of larger birds, quieter aircraft, and an increase in the number of rotorcraft operations. In addition to the increased frequency of bird strikes, the FAA has observed increased strikes to the rotorcraft windscreen area with a force of impact that has directly endangered occupants and elevated the risk to safe rotorcraft operations. Bird penetration into the cockpit and cabin areas has become increasingly common, elevating the probability of potential serious injuries or fatalities to occupants. Moreover, direct bird impact to the pilot has led to partial or complete pilot incapacitation in numerous cases, often causing an increased risk for loss of control of the rotorcraft and fatalities. The typical scenario is that the bird strikes and shatters a portion of the front windscreen. The bird's remains, as well as damaged portions of the rotorcraft (such as the windscreen), either hit the pilot in the head, neck, or upper torso, or proceed through the cockpit to strike the passengers or crew. These recent observations reinforce previous findings from the study, Bird Strikes to Civil Helicopters in the United States, 1990- 2005 (2006), by Cleary, Dolbeer, and Wright, based on 15 years of data from the FAA's National Wildlife Database. The study concluded that: (1) Helicopters were significantly more likely to be damaged by bird strikes than airplanes, (2) windshields on helicopters were more frequently struck and damaged than windshields on airplanes, and (3) helicopter bird strikes were more likely to lead to injuries to crew or passengers than airplane bird strikes. The NTSB referenced these same findings in its accident report of a 2009 fatal rotorcraft accident in Morgan City, LA, where a bird strike was determined to be the probable cause of the accident (NTSB Aircraft Accident Report No. CEN09MA117). Some bird strike events where the bird penetrates the cockpit and cabin have received less attention either because the damage was limited to the windscreen or because the injury to the crew and passengers was minor. However, a superficial examination of the rotorcraft damage and occupant injury levels is misleading. The FAA has found that most of these cases had less to do with the sufficiency of aircraft design and equipage, and more to do with the crew's personal protective gear--such as helmets--that mitigated the potential event severity. Other cases of low severity are the result of fortuitous circumstance. One specific example occurred during a March 2015 police operation in Dallas, Texas, where a bird penetrated the cockpit and struck the pilot, who was not wearing a helmet. The pilot was incapacitated by the impact and--under ordinary circumstances--the event would likely have led to a fatal outcome from loss of rotorcraft control. However, the left seat occupant happened to be a rated helicopter pilot, something that was not typical for the police operation being conducted. The left seat occupant then assumed control of the rotorcraft and landed without incident. The result was an event with a low-severity outcome, but the underlying lesson from the relatively benign consequence cannot be dismissed. While the absence of any bird strike requirements for normal category rotorcraft must be addressed, data shows that bird strikes with transport category rotorcraft are a growing concern, especially encounters with larger birds. Transport category rotorcraft are more likely to spend extended time in the en route phase of flight and fly at higher altitudes. While the higher altitude would appear to reduce the probability of encountering bird strike, data shows an increased altitude does not mitigate the severity of damage when a bird strike occurs. A United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) study found that, of the 32 damaging strikes that occurred to U.S. rotorcraft in 2014, 72% of those occurred more than 500 feet above ground level. The study opined that the more severe damage was likely attributable to the higher speed of the rotorcraft during the en route phase of flight. The increased exposure of transport category rotorcraft in this environment suggests the existing 2.2-pound bird strike requirement may not be adequate. Whether normal category or transport category, the unique operating profile of a helicopter leads to a different exposure to bird strike risk than does fixed-wing aircraft. The study, Wildlife strikes to civil helicopters in the U.S., 1990-2011 (2013) by Washburn, Cisar, and Default, discusses some of the differences. It concluded that, unlike with fixed-wing aircraft, helicopter bird strikes occur with greatest frequency during the en route phase of flight and in the off-airfield environment. It credits bird strikes that occur in the off-airfield environment as accounting for the majority of bird strike-related human injuries and fatalities for helicopters. Since helicopters operate at much lower altitudes than fixed-wing aircraft, the exposure to the risk of a bird strike is not limited to the departure and arrival phases of flight, but instead remains for the duration of the flight profile. The Task The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group will provide advice and recommendations to the ARAC on bird strike protection rulemaking, policy, and guidance for parts 27 and 29. The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group is tasked to: 1. For normal category rotorcraft, specifically advise and make written recommendations on how to incorporate bird strike protection requirements into the part 27 airworthiness standards for newly type certificated rotorcraft. 2. For normal category rotorcraft, specifically advise and make written recommendations on how the bird strike protection requirements in Task 1 should be made effective via Sec. 27.2 for newly manufactured rotorcraft. 3. For transport category rotorcraft, specifically advise and make written recommendations on how to enhance [[Page 24932]] the Sec. 29.631 bird strike protection airworthiness standard in light of increases in bird weight and increased exposure to bird strikes for newly type certificated rotorcraft. 4. For transport category rotorcraft, specifically advise and make written recommendations on how the bird strike protection requirements in Task 3 should be made effective via Sec. 29.2 for newly manufactured rotorcraft. 5. For normal and transport category rotorcraft, specifically advise and make written recommendations on incorporating rotorcraft bird strike protection improvements and standards into the existing rotorcraft fleet. 6. For Tasks 1 through 5, consider existing non-traditional bird strike protection technology, including the use of aircraft flight manual limitations (such as requiring airspeed limitations at lower altitudes), when making the recommendations. These considerations must include: An evaluation of the effectiveness of such technology, assumptions used as part of that evaluation, validation of those assumptions, and any procedures to be used for operation with the technology or with the aircraft limitations. 7. Based on the recommendations in Tasks 1 through 6, specifically advise and make written recommendations for the associated policy and guidance. 8. Based on the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group recommendations, perform the following: a. Estimate what the regulated parties would do differently as a result of the proposed recommendation and how much it would cost. b. Estimate the safety improvements of future bird encounters from the proposed recommendations. c. Estimate any other benefits (e.g., reduced administrative burden) or costs that would result from implementation of the recommendations. 9. Develop a report containing recommendations on the findings and results of the tasks explained above. The report should document: a. Both majority and dissenting positions on the findings and the rationale for each position. b. Any disagreements, including the rationale for each position and the reasons for the disagreement. 10. The working group may be reinstated to assist the ARAC in responding to the FAA's questions or concerns after the recommendation report has been submitted. Schedule The recommendation report should be submitted to the FAA for review and acceptance no later than 18 months after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Working Group Activity The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group must comply with the procedures adopted by the ARAC as follows: 1. Conduct a review and analysis of the assigned tasks and any other related materials or documents. 2. Draft and submit a work plan for completion of the task, including the rationale supporting such a plan, for consideration by the ARAC. 3. Provide a status report at each ARAC meeting. 4. Draft and submit the recommendation report based on review and analysis of the assigned tasks. 5. Present the recommendation report at the ARAC meeting. Participation in the Working Group The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group will be comprised of technical experts having an interest in the assigned task. A working group member need not be a member representative of the ARAC. The FAA would like a wide range of members (normal category rotorcraft manufacturers, transport category rotorcraft manufacturers, and rotorcraft operators from various segments of the industry such as oil and gas exploration, emergency medical services, and air tour operators) to ensure all aspects of the tasks are considered in development of the recommendations. The provisions of the August 13, 2014, Office of Management and Budget guidance, ``Revised Guidance on Appointment of Lobbyists to Federal Advisory Committees, Boards, and Commissions'' (79 FR 47482), continues the ban on registered lobbyists participating on Agency Boards and Commissions if participating in their ``individual capacity.'' The revised guidance now allows registered lobbyists to participate on Agency Boards and Commissions in a ``representative capacity'' for the ``express purpose of providing a committee with the views of a nongovernmental entity, a recognizable group of persons or nongovernmental entities (an industry, sector, labor unions, or environmental groups, etc.) or state or local government.'' (For further information, see Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 as amended, 2 U.S.C. 1603, 1604, and 1605.) If you wish to become a member of the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group, write the person listed under the caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that desire. Describe your interest in the task and state the expertise you would bring to the working group. The FAA must receive all requests by May 27, 2016. The ARAC and the FAA will review the requests and advise you whether or not your request is approved. If you are chosen for membership in the working group, you must actively participate in the working group, attend all meetings, and provide written comments when requested. You must devote the resources necessary to support the working group in meeting any assigned deadlines. You must keep your management and those you may represent advised of working group activities and decisions to ensure the proposed technical solutions do not conflict with the position of those you represent. Once the working group has begun deliberations, members will not be added or substituted without the approval of the ARAC Chair, the FAA, including the Designated Federal Officer, and the Working Group Chair. The Secretary of Transportation determined the formation and use of the ARAC is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law. The ARAC meetings are open to the public. However, meetings of the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group are not open to the public, except to the extent individuals with an interest and expertise are selected to participate. The FAA will make no public announcement of working group meetings. Issued in Washington, DC, on April 19, 2016. Lirio Liu, Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. [FR Doc. 2016-09781 Filed 4-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![24930 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC Federal Aviation Administration
through Friday, except Federal holidays. 20590–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan • Hand Delivery or Courier: Take Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Ngo, 202–267–4264 800 Independence comments to Docket Operations in Committee—New Task
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591. Room W12–140 of the West Building AGENCY: Federal Aviation
This notice is published pursuant to 14 Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Administration (FAA), DOT.
CFR 11.85. Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 ACTION: Notice of a new task assignment
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
2016. Friday, except Federal holidays. Committee.
James M. Crotty, • Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. Operations at 202–493–2251. SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Petition for Exemption 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the Committee (ARAC) a new task to
Docket No.: FAA–2015–0481. public to better inform its rulemaking provide recommendations regarding
Petitioner: Aviation Systems process. DOT posts these comments, bird strike protection rulemaking,
Engineering Company. without edit, including any personal policy, and guidance for normal
Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: information the commenter provides, to category rotorcraft and to provide
§§ 91.119(c) and 91.151(a)(1). http://www.regulations.gov, as recommendations to enhance the
Description of Relief Sought: The described in the system of records existing bird strike protection standards
petitioner is seeking relief to amend notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can for transport category rotorcraft. The
Exemption No. 11509 to operate within be reviewed at http://www.dot.gov/ FAA amended its regulations to
500 feet from nonparticipating persons, privacy. incorporate bird strike protection rules
as well as relief from the minimum fuel Docket: Background documents or for transport category rotorcraft in 1996.
requirement. comments received may be read at Data shows an increase in the bird
[FR Doc. 2016–09779 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am] http://www.regulations.gov at any time. population and weight has resulted in
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Follow the online instructions for an increase in bird strikes with both
accessing the docket or go to the Docket normal category rotorcraft and transport
Operations in Room W12–140 of the category rotorcraft. The increase in bird
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION West Building Ground Floor at 1200 strikes has led to more frequent bird
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, penetration into the cockpit and cabin
Federal Aviation Administration DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday areas, elevating the risk of potential
[Summary Notice No. 2016–49] through Friday, except Federal holidays. serious injuries or fatalities to
occupants. Direct bird impact to the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: pilot has led to partial or complete pilot
Petition for Exemption; Summary of
Petition Received; VT DRB Aviation Deana Stedman, ANM–113, Federal incapacitation in numerous cases,
Consultants Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind increasing the risk of fatalities.
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356, This notice informs the public of the
AGENCY: Federal Aviation email deana.stedman@faa.gov, phone new ARAC activity and solicits
Administration (FAA), DOT. (425) 227–2148. membership for the Rotorcraft Bird
ACTION: Notice. This notice is published pursuant to Strike Working Group.
14 CFR 11.85. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
SUMMARY: This notice contains a
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20, B. Roach, Federal Aviation
summary of a petition seeking relief
2016. Administration, 10101 Hillwood
from specified requirements of Title 14
James M. Crotty, Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177,
of the Code of Federal Regulations. The
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. Gary.B.Roach@faa.gov, phone number
purpose of this notice is to improve the
817–222–5110, facsimile number 817–
public’s awareness of, and participation Petition for Exemption 222–5961.
in, the FAA’s exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor Docket No.: FAA–2015–8751. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the inclusion or omission of information Petitioner: VT DRB Aviation ARAC Acceptance of Task
in the summary is intended to affect the Consultants.
legal status of the petition or its final Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: As a result of the March 23, 2016,
disposition. § 25.817. ARAC meeting, the FAA assigned and
ARAC accepted this task establishing
DATES: Comments on this petition must Description of Relief Sought: VT DRB the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working
identify the petition docket number and Aviation Consultants petitions the FAA Group. The Rotorcraft Bird Strike
must be received on or before May 17, for an exemption from § 25.817 which Working Group will serve as staff to the
2016. allows no more than three seats abreast ARAC and provide advice and
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
on each side of the aisle in any one row.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
recommendations on the assigned task.
by docket number FAA–2015–8751 Instead, the petitioner wishes to install The ARAC will review and accept the
using any of the following methods: four seats abreast on one side of the recommendation report and will submit
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to aisle with no seats on the opposite side, it to the FAA.
http://www.regulations.gov and follow having less passenger egress impedance
the online instructions for sending your than in standard Boeing Model 777 Background
comments electronically. passenger jet configurations. The FAA established the ARAC to
• Mail: Send comments to Docket [FR Doc. 2016–09773 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am] provide information, advice, and
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of BILLING CODE 4910–13–P recommendations on aviation-related
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_25011/page/1.svg)
![24932 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 27, 2016 / Notices
the § 29.631 bird strike protection publication of this notice in the Federal working group. The FAA must receive
airworthiness standard in light of Register. all requests by May 27, 2016. The ARAC
increases in bird weight and increased and the FAA will review the requests
Working Group Activity
exposure to bird strikes for newly type and advise you whether or not your
certificated rotorcraft. The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working request is approved.
4. For transport category rotorcraft, Group must comply with the procedures If you are chosen for membership in
specifically advise and make written adopted by the ARAC as follows: the working group, you must actively
recommendations on how the bird strike 1. Conduct a review and analysis of participate in the working group, attend
protection requirements in Task 3 the assigned tasks and any other related all meetings, and provide written
should be made effective via § 29.2 for materials or documents. comments when requested. You must
newly manufactured rotorcraft. 2. Draft and submit a work plan for devote the resources necessary to
5. For normal and transport category completion of the task, including the support the working group in meeting
rotorcraft, specifically advise and make rationale supporting such a plan, for any assigned deadlines. You must keep
written recommendations on consideration by the ARAC. your management and those you may
incorporating rotorcraft bird strike 3. Provide a status report at each represent advised of working group
protection improvements and standards ARAC meeting. activities and decisions to ensure the
into the existing rotorcraft fleet. 4. Draft and submit the proposed technical solutions do not
6. For Tasks 1 through 5, consider recommendation report based on review conflict with the position of those you
existing non-traditional bird strike and analysis of the assigned tasks. represent. Once the working group has
protection technology, including the use 5. Present the recommendation report begun deliberations, members will not
of aircraft flight manual limitations at the ARAC meeting. be added or substituted without the
(such as requiring airspeed limitations Participation in the Working Group approval of the ARAC Chair, the FAA,
at lower altitudes), when making the The Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working including the Designated Federal
recommendations. These considerations Group will be comprised of technical Officer, and the Working Group Chair.
must include: An evaluation of the The Secretary of Transportation
experts having an interest in the
effectiveness of such technology, determined the formation and use of the
assigned task. A working group member
assumptions used as part of that ARAC is necessary and in the public
need not be a member representative of
evaluation, validation of those interest in connection with the
the ARAC. The FAA would like a wide
assumptions, and any procedures to be performance of duties imposed on the
range of members (normal category
used for operation with the technology FAA by law.
rotorcraft manufacturers, transport
or with the aircraft limitations. The ARAC meetings are open to the
category rotorcraft manufacturers, and
7. Based on the recommendations in public. However, meetings of the
rotorcraft operators from various
Tasks 1 through 6, specifically advise Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working Group
segments of the industry such as oil and
and make written recommendations for are not open to the public, except to the
gas exploration, emergency medical
the associated policy and guidance. extent individuals with an interest and
8. Based on the Rotorcraft Bird Strike services, and air tour operators) to
expertise are selected to participate. The
Working Group recommendations, ensure all aspects of the tasks are
FAA will make no public
perform the following: considered in development of the
announcement of working group
a. Estimate what the regulated parties recommendations. The provisions of the
meetings.
would do differently as a result of the August 13, 2014, Office of Management
and Budget guidance, ‘‘Revised Issued in Washington, DC, on April 19,
proposed recommendation and how 2016.
much it would cost. Guidance on Appointment of Lobbyists
to Federal Advisory Committees, Lirio Liu,
b. Estimate the safety improvements Designated Federal Officer, Aviation
of future bird encounters from the Boards, and Commissions’’ (79 FR
47482), continues the ban on registered Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
proposed recommendations. [FR Doc. 2016–09781 Filed 4–26–16; 8:45 am]
c. Estimate any other benefits (e.g., lobbyists participating on Agency
reduced administrative burden) or costs Boards and Commissions if BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
that would result from implementation participating in their ‘‘individual
of the recommendations. capacity.’’ The revised guidance now
allows registered lobbyists to participate DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
9. Develop a report containing
recommendations on the findings and on Agency Boards and Commissions in Federal Aviation Administration
results of the tasks explained above. The a ‘‘representative capacity’’ for the
report should document: ‘‘express purpose of providing a [Summary Notice No. 2016–59]
a. Both majority and dissenting committee with the views of a
nongovernmental entity, a recognizable Petition for Exemption; Summary of
positions on the findings and the
group of persons or nongovernmental Petition Received; Bombardier
rationale for each position.
entities (an industry, sector, labor Aerospace
b. Any disagreements, including the
rationale for each position and the unions, or environmental groups, etc.) AGENCY: Federal Aviation
reasons for the disagreement. or state or local government.’’ (For Administration (FAA), DOT.
10. The working group may be further information, see Lobbying ACTION: Notice.
Disclosure Act of 1995 as amended, 2
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reinstated to assist the ARAC in
responding to the FAA’s questions or U.S.C. 1603, 1604, and 1605.) SUMMARY: This notice contains a
concerns after the recommendation If you wish to become a member of summary of a petition seeking relief
report has been submitted. the Rotorcraft Bird Strike Working from specified requirements of Title 14
Group, write the person listed under the of the Code of Federal Regulations. The
Schedule caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION purpose of this notice is to improve the
The recommendation report should be CONTACT expressing that desire. Describe public’s awareness of, and participation
submitted to the FAA for review and your interest in the task and state the in, the FAA’s exemption process.
acceptance no later than 18 months after expertise you would bring to the Neither publication of this notice nor
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Apr 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_25011/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-07 13:55:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-07 13:55:53
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of a new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee. | |
| Contact | Gary B. Roach, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177, [email protected], phone number 817-222-5110, facsimile number 817- 222-5961. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 24930 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR