81 FR 26206 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 84 (May 2, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 84 (May 2, 2016)
| Page Range | 26206-26209 | |
| FR Document | 2016-10243 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 26206-26209] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-10243] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP [[Page 26207]] data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after May 2016, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of May 2016,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in May for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings Belgium: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-423- 5/1/15-4/30/16 808........................................... Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, A-351-503.. 5/1/15-4/30/16 Canada: Citric Acid and Citrate Salt, A-122-853 5/1/15-4/30/16 India: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipes 5/1/15-4/30/16 and Tubes, A-533-502...................... Silicomanganese, A-533-823................. 5/1/15-4/30/16 Indonesia: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A- 5/1/15-4/30/16 560-822....................................... Japan: Diffusion-Annealed Nickel-Plated Flat- 5/1/15-4/30/16 Rolled Steel Products, A-588-869.......... Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker, A- 588-815................................... Kazakhstan: Silicomanganese, A-834-807......... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Republic of Korea: Polyester Staple Fiber, A- 5/1/15-4/30/16 580-839....................................... Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene 5/1/15-4/30/16 Retail Carrier Bags, A-552-806................ South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A- 5/1/15-4/30/16 791-805....................................... Taiwan: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes 5/1/15-4/30/16 and Tubes, A-583-008...................... Polyester Staple Fiber, A-583-833.......... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-583-843 5/1/15-4/30/16 Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-583-830.. 5/1/15-4/30/16 Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents, A-583- 5/1/15-4/30/16 848....................................... The People's Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions, A-570-967............. 5/1/15-4/30/16 Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line 5/1/15-4/30/16 Pipe, A-570-935........................... Citric Acid and Citrate Salt, A-570-937.... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Iron Construction Castings, A-570-502...... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-570-943....... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Pure Magnesium, A-570-832.................. 5/1/15-4/30/16 Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents, A-570- 5/1/15-4/30/16 972....................................... Turkey: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 5/1/15-4/30/16 Tubes, A-489-501.......................... Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A- 5/1/15-4/30/16 489-815................................... [[Page 26208]] United Arab Emirates: Steel Nails, A-520-804... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Venezuela: Silicomanganese, A-307-820.......... 5/1/15-4/30/16 Countervailing Duty Proceedings Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, C-351-504.. 1/1/15--12/31/15 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene 1/1/15--12/31/15 Retail Carrier Bags, C-552-805................ South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, C- 1/1/15--12/31/15 791-806....................................... The People's Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions, C-570-968............. 1/1/15--12/31/15 Citric Acid and Citrate Salt, C-570-938.... 1/1/15--12/31/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension Agreements None. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of May 2016. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of May 2016, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of [[Page 26209]] the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: April 26, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2016-10243 Filed 4-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![26206 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2016 / Notices
rule identifies five categories of factual for submissions in antidumping and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), countervailing duty proceedings: Final
which are summarized as follows: (i) Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). International Trade Administration
Evidence submitted in response to The modification clarifies that parties
questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted may request an extension of time limits Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
in support of allegations; (iii) publicly before a time limit established under Order, Finding, or Suspended
available information to value factors part 351 expires, or as otherwise Investigation; Opportunity To Request
under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure specified by the Secretary. In general, an Administrative Review
the adequacy of remuneration under 19 extension request will be considered AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed untimely if it is filed after the time limit International Trade Administration,
on the record by the Department; and (v) established under part 351 expires. For Department of Commerce.
evidence other than factual information submissions which are due from FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
described in (i)–(iv). The final rule multiple parties simultaneously, an Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
requires any party, when submitting extension request will be considered Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
factual information, to specify under untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on Enforcement and Compliance,
which subsection of 19 CFR the due date. Examples include, but are
351.102(b)(21) the information is being International Trade Administration,
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
submitted and, if the information is
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
(2) factual information to value factors Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
factual information already on the
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 482–4735.
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on the adequacy of remuneration under 19 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the record that the factual information CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, Background
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 clarification and correction filed Each year during the anniversary
so that, rather than providing general pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) month of the publication of an
time limits, there are specific time limits comments concerning the selection of a antidumping or countervailing duty
based on the type of factual information surrogate country and surrogate values order, finding, or suspended
being submitted. These modifications and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning investigation, an interested party, as
are effective for all segments initiated on U.S. Customs and Border Protection defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
or after May 10, 2013. Please review the data; and (5) quantity and value Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
final rule, available at http:// questionnaires. Under certain may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ circumstances, the Department may 351.213, that the Department of
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to elect to specify a different time limit by Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
submitting factual information in this which extension requests will be an administrative review of that
segment. considered untimely for submissions antidumping or countervailing duty
Any party submitting factual which are due from multiple parties order, finding, or suspended
information in an antidumping duty or simultaneously. In such a case, the investigation.
countervailing duty proceeding must Department will inform parties in the All deadlines for the submission of
certify to the accuracy and completeness letter or memorandum setting forth the comments or actions by the Department
of that information.4 Parties are hereby deadline (including a specified time) by discussed below refer to the number of
reminded that revised certification which extension requests must be filed calendar days from the applicable
requirements are in effect for company/ to be considered timely. This starting date.
government officials as well as their modification also requires that an Respondent Selection
representatives. All segments of any extension request must be made in a In the event the Department limits the
antidumping duty or countervailing separate, stand-alone submission, and number of respondents for individual
duty proceedings initiated on or after clarifies the circumstances under which examination for administrative reviews
August 16, 2013, should use the formats the Department will grant untimely- initiated pursuant to requests made for
for the revised certifications provided at filed requests for the extension of time the orders identified below, the
the end of the Final Rule.5 The limits. These modifications are effective Department intends to select
Department intends to reject factual for all segments initiated on or after respondents based on U.S. Customs and
submissions in any proceeding October 21, 2013. Please review the Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
segments if the submitting party does final rule, available at http:// imports during the period of review. We
not comply with applicable revised www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ intend to release the CBP data under
certification requirements. html/2013-22853.htm, prior to Administrative Protective Order
Revised Extension of Time Limits submitting factual information in these (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
Regulation segments. within five days of publication of the
On September 20, 2013, the These initiations and this notice are initiation notice and to make our
Department modified its regulation in accordance with section 751(a) of the decision regarding respondent selection
concerning the extension of time limits Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR within 21 days of publication of the
351.221(c)(1)(i). initiation Federal Register notice.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 See section 782(b) of the Act. Therefore, we encourage all parties
Dated: April 26, 2016.
5 See Certification of Factual Information To interested in commenting on respondent
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Christian Marsh, selection to submit their APO
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping applications on the date of publication
17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently and Countervailing Duty Operations.
asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available
of the initiation notice, or as soon
[FR Doc. 2016–10244 Filed 4–29–16; 8:45 am] thereafter as possible. The Department
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P invites comments regarding the CBP
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Apr 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_26290/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2016 / Notices 26209
the order, if such a gap period is amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Background
applicable to the period of review. Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
This notice is not required by statute automatically initiating the five-year The Department’s procedures for the
but is published as a service to the review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
international trading community. antidumping and countervailing duty in its Procedures for Conducting Five-
(‘‘AD/CVD’’) order(s) listed below. The Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Dated: April 26, 2016. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
International Trade Commission (‘‘the
Christian Marsh, Commission’’) is publishing Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998)
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping concurrently with this notice its notice and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005).
and Countervailing Duty Operations. of Institution of Five-Year Review which Guidance on methodological or
[FR Doc. 2016–10243 Filed 4–29–16; 8:45 am] covers the same order(s). analytical issues relevant to the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DATES: Effective (May 1, 2016). Department’s conduct of Sunset
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Reviews is set forth in Antidumping
Department official identified in the Proceedings: Calculation of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Initiation of Review section below at
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Assessment Rate in Certain
International Trade Administration
Compliance, International Trade Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Administration, U.S. Department of Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
Review Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 2012).
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Initiation of Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, For information from the Commission
International Trade Administration, contact Mary Messer, Office of In accordance with 19 CFR
Department of Commerce. Investigations, U.S. International Trade 351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset
SUMMARY: In accordance with section Commission at (202) 205–3193. Reviews of the following antidumping
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and countervailing duty order(s):
DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Department contact
A–821–809 ....... 731–TA–808 Russia ............... Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Prod- Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255.
ucts (3rd Review).
Filing Information representatives in these segments.3 The submitting factual information in these
As a courtesy, we are making formats for the revised certifications are segments.5
information related to sunset provided at the end of the Final Rule.
The Department intends to reject factual Letters of Appearance and
proceedings, including copies of the Administrative Protective Orders
pertinent statute and Department’s submissions if the submitting party does
regulations, the Department’s schedule not comply with the revised Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the
for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past certification requirements.
On April 10, 2013, the Department Department will maintain and make
revocations and continuations, and available a public service list for these
current service lists, available to the modified two regulations related to AD/
CVD proceedings: The definition of proceedings. Parties wishing to
public on the Department’s Web site at participate in any of these five-year
the following address: ‘‘http:// factual information (19 CFR
351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for reviews must file letters of appearance
enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/.’’ All as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To
submissions in these Sunset Reviews the submission of factual information
(19 CFR 351.301).4 Parties are advised to facilitate the timely preparation of the
must be filed in accordance with the
review the final rule, available at http:// public service list, it is requested that
Department’s regulations regarding
format, translation, and service of enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ those seeking recognition as interested
documents. These rules, including 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to parties to a proceeding submit an entry
electronic filing requirements via submitting factual information in these of appearance within 10 days of the
Enforcement and Compliance’s segments. To the extent that other publication of the Notice of Initiation.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty regulations govern the submission of Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews
Centralized Electronic Service System factual information in a segment (such
can be very short, we urge interested
(‘‘ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits
will continue to be applied. Parties are parties who want access to proprietary
351.303.1 information under administrative
This notice serves as a reminder that also advised to review the final rule
concerning the extension of time limits protective order (‘‘APO’’) to file an APO
any party submitting factual information application immediately following
in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify for submissions in AD/CVD
proceedings, available at http:// publication in the Federal Register of
to the accuracy and completeness of that
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ this notice of initiation. The
information.2 Parties are hereby
1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to Department’s regulations on submission
reminded that revised certification
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
requirements are in effect for company/ of proprietary information and
government officials as well as their
3 See Certification of Factual Information To eligibility to receive access to business
Import Administration During Antidumping and proprietary information under APO can
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
1 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’) (amending 19 CFR be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306.
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 351.303(g)).
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 4 See Definition of Factual Information and Time
39263 (July 6, 2011). Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final 5 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790
2 See section 782(b) of the Act. Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013). (September 20, 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Apr 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_26290/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-04-30 13:35:01
Document Modified: 2016-04-30 13:35:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 26206 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR