81_FR_28823 81 FR 28733 - Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract Term Limit for Energy Savings Contracts (DFARS Case 2015-D018)

81 FR 28733 - Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract Term Limit for Energy Savings Contracts (DFARS Case 2015-D018)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 90 (May 10, 2016)

Page Range28733-28735
FR Document2016-10824

DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to clarify the contract term for energy savings contracts awarded under 10 U.S.C. 2913.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28733-28735]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 241

[Docket DARS-2015-0050]
RIN 0750-AI74


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract Term 
Limit for Energy Savings Contracts (DFARS Case 2015-D018)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to clarify the contract term 
for energy savings contracts awarded under 10 U.S.C. 2913.

DATES: Effective May 10, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372-
6106.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 80 FR 
72675 on November 20, 2015, to clarify the contract term for contracts 
awarded under the statutory authority of 10 U.S.C. 2913. Ten 
respondents submitted public comments in response to the proposed rule.

[[Page 28734]]

II. Discussion and Analysis

    DoD reviewed the public comments in the development of the final 
rule. A discussion of the comments received and the changes made to the 
rule as a result of those comments follows:

A. Summary of Significant Changes From the Proposed Rule

    The final rule has been revised at DFARS 241.103(2) to provide that 
the contracting officer may enter into an energy savings contract under 
10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years. This change to 
``energy savings contract'' from ``shared energy savings contract'' 
brings the term limit for all activities authorized by section 2913 
under the final rule.

B. Analysis of Public Comments

1. General Support for the Rule
    Comment: Several respondents expressed support for the changes in 
the proposed rule, indicating that the term limit of 25 years would 
promote the use of shared energy savings contracts, have a positive 
benefit on small businesses, facilitate greater partnerships between 
utilities and DoD customers, and increase competition. One respondent 
indicated that the term limit of 25 years would lead to several 
benefits including deeper retrofits, elimination of cream skimming, 
effectively leveraging private sector funding, and accomplishing the 
President's Performance Contracting Challenge goals.
    Response: Noted.
2. Clarification of the Contract Period
    Comment: One respondent requested clarification of the date that 
the contract period commences. The respondent stated that the rule 
would most effectively accomplish its goal of accommodating project 
financing needs if the contract period were tied to the payment term, 
and suggested that the rule be revised to state the following: ``The 
contracting officer may enter into a shared energy savings contract 
under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a `payment term' not to exceed 25 years.''
    Response: Payment term is interpreted as the performance period of 
the contract, which is not to exceed 25 years. The contract period will 
include the entire performance period, including construction, if any.
3. Inclusion of Water-Related Projects
    Comment: One respondent expressed concern that the rule's failure 
to address water-related projects authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2866 would 
result in ambiguity and confusion with regard to the term limit for 
such contracts. The respondent suggested that the rule be revised to 
state the following: ``The contracting officer may enter into a 
contract under 10 U.S.C. 2913 or 10 U.S.C. 2866 for a period not to 
exceed 25 years.''
    Response: The recommendation is beyond the scope of the case.
4. Application of 10 U.S.C. 2913 to Agreements With Gas or Electric 
Utilities
    Comment: One respondent stated that 10 U.S.C. 2913 applies not only 
to shared energy savings contracts, but also to agreements with gas or 
electric companies, and recommended removing the reference to shared 
energy savings contracts.
    Response: The final rule has been revised at 241.103(2) to provide 
that the contracting officer may enter into an energy savings contract 
under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years.

III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition 
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available 
Off-the-Shelf Items

    This rule does not add any new provisions or clauses or impact any 
existing provisions or clauses.

IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not 
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning 
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule 
under 5 U.S.C. 804.

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) has been prepared 
consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. 
The FRFA is summarized as follows:
    This final rule amends the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) to clarify the contract term for contracts awarded 
under the statutory authority of 10 U.S.C. 2913. Section 2913 requires 
DoD to develop a simplified method of contracting for shared energy 
savings contract services that will accelerate the use of such 
contracts. DoD is authorized by section 2913 to contract with utility 
service providers to implement energy conservation measures on military 
bases. Section 2913 does not indicate a term limit for contracts or 
activities executed under this authority, and this has created 
ambiguity and inconsistency throughout DoD on the term limit that is 
imposed on contracts awarded under the authority. Additionally, the 
ambiguity has resulted in a hesitation to enter shared energy savings 
contracts, contrary to the intent of section 2913.
    No comments were received from the public regarding the initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The rule is not anticipated to have a significant economic impact 
on small business entities. The number of contract awards made under 
the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2913 is not currently tracked by DoD's 
business systems. However, it is estimated that approximately 25 shared 
energy savings projects are initiated across DoD each year, with 
approximately 17 being awarded annually. It is believed that most 
awards are made to large utility providers, with generally 25% or more 
of the renovation and operations and maintenance work executed under 
the awards being subcontracted to local small business by the utility 
provider.
    This rule does not create any new reporting or recordkeeping 
requirements.
    There are no known significant alternatives to the rule.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 241

    Government procurement.

Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR part 241 is amended as follows:

PART 241--ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 241 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.


0
2. Amend section 241.103 by--
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4); and
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (2).

[[Page 28735]]

    The addition reads as follows:


241.103  Statutory and delegated authority.

* * * * *
    (2) The contracting officer may enter into an energy savings 
contract under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-10824 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P



                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                                28733

                                           SUMMARY:  DoD is issuing a final rule                   Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add                     Long-haul telecommunications means
                                           amending the Defense Federal                            a definition of ‘‘long-haul                           all general and special purpose long-
                                           Acquisition Regulation Supplement                       telecommunications’’ and provide a                    distance telecommunications facilities
                                           (DFARS) to add a definition of ‘‘long-                  pointer to DFARS Procedures,                          and services (including commercial
                                           haul telecommunications.’’                              Guidance, and Information for                         satellite services, terminal equipment
                                           DATES: Effective May 10, 2016.                          procedures internal to DoD.                           and local circuitry supporting the long-
                                                                                                      No comments were received from the                 haul service) to or from the post, camp,
                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
                                                                                                   public regarding the initial regulatory               base, or station switch and/or main
                                           Christopher Stiller, telephone 571–372–
                                                                                                   flexibility analysis.                                 distribution frame (except for trunk
                                           6176.
                                                                                                      The requirements under this rule will              lines to the first-serving commercial
                                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              apply to long-haul telecommunications                 central office for local communications
                                           I. Background                                           (Product Service Code D304)                           services).
                                                                                                   requirements as defined in the DoD                    *     *      *     *     *
                                              DoD published a proposed rule in the                 Directive 5105.19, Defense Information
                                           Federal Register at 80 FR 72674 on                                                                            ■ 3. Amend section 239.7402 by adding
                                                                                                   Systems Agency. According to data
                                           November 20, 2015, to revise DFARS                                                                            paragraph (d) to read as follows:
                                                                                                   available in the Federal Procurement
                                           subpart 239.74 to add ‘‘long-haul                       Data System-Next Generation (FPDS–                    239.7402    Policy.
                                           telecommunications’’ to the                             NG) for fiscal year 2014 through July 31,
                                           telecommunications services definitions                                                                       *      *    *    *     *
                                                                                                   2015, DoD awarded 13,596 new long-                       (d) Long-haul telecommunications
                                           and identify Defense Information                        haul telecommunications contracts.
                                           Systems Agency as the procurer of long-                                                                       services. When there is a requirement
                                                                                                   Approximately 3 percent (451) of the                  for procurement of long-haul
                                           haul telecommunications services for                    total were awarded to small entities
                                           DoD, as mentioned in DoD Directive                                                                            telecommunications services, follow
                                                                                                   (comprised of 222 unique small                        PGI 239.7402(d).
                                           5105.19, Defense Information Systems                    entities).
                                           Agency. There were no public                               This rule does not create any new
                                                                                                                                                         [FR Doc. 2016–10825 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
                                           comments submitted in response to the                   reporting or recordkeeping                            BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
                                           proposed rule. There are no changes                     requirements.
                                           from the proposed rule made in the final                   There are no known significant
                                           rule.                                                                                                         DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                                                                   alternatives to the rule. The impact of
                                           II. Applicability to Contracts at or                    this rule on small entities is not                    Defense Acquisition Regulations
                                           Below the Simplified Acquisition                        expected to be significant because it                 System
                                           Threshold and for Commercial Items,                     only affects DoD internal operating
                                           Including Commercially Available Off-                   procedures.                                           48 CFR Part 241
                                           the-Shelf Items                                         V. Paperwork Reduction Act                            [Docket DARS–2015–0050]
                                             This case does not add any new                          The rule does not contain any
                                           provisions or clauses or impact any                                                                           RIN 0750–AI74
                                                                                                   information collection requirements that
                                           existing provisions or clauses.                         require the approval of the Office of                 Defense Federal Acquisition
                                           III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563                   Management and Budget under the                       Regulation Supplement: Contract Term
                                                                                                   Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.                    Limit for Energy Savings Contracts
                                              Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and                   chapter 35).
                                           13563 direct agencies to assess all costs                                                                     (DFARS Case 2015–D018)
                                           and benefits of available regulatory                    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 239                   AGENCY:  Defense Acquisition
                                           alternatives and, if regulation is                          Government procurement.                           Regulations System, Department of
                                           necessary, to select regulatory                                                                               Defense (DoD).
                                           approaches that maximize net benefits                   Jennifer L. Hawes,
                                                                                                   Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations               ACTION: Final rule.
                                           (including potential economic,
                                           environmental, public health and safety                 System.
                                                                                                                                                         SUMMARY:  DoD is issuing a final rule
                                           effects, distributive impacts, and                        Therefore, 48 CFR part 239 is                       amending the Defense Federal
                                           equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the                      amended as follows:                                   Acquisition Regulation Supplement
                                           importance of quantifying both costs                                                                          (DFARS) to clarify the contract term for
                                           and benefits, of reducing costs, of                     PART 239—ACQUISITION OF                               energy savings contracts awarded under
                                           harmonizing rules, and of promoting                     INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY                                10 U.S.C. 2913.
                                           flexibility. This is not a significant                                                                        DATES: Effective May 10, 2016.
                                           regulatory action and, therefore, was not               ■ 1. The authority citation for part 239
                                                                                                   continues to read as follows:                         FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
                                           subject to review under section 6(b) of
                                           E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and                       Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR                Amy Williams, telephone 571–372–
                                           Review, dated September 30, 1993. This                  chapter 1.                                            6106.
                                           rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.                 ■ 2. Amend section 239.7401 by—                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                           804.                                                    ■ a. Removing the alphabetical                        I. Background
                                           IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act                          paragraph designation from each
                                                                                                   definition; and                                         DoD published a proposed rule in the
                                             A final regulatory flexibility analysis               ■ b. Adding, in alphabetical order, a                 Federal Register at 80 FR 72675 on
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                           (FRFA) has been prepared consistent                     new definition for ‘‘Long-haul                        November 20, 2015, to clarify the
                                           with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5                  telecommunications’’.                                 contract term for contracts awarded
                                           U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is                            The addition reads as follows:                     under the statutory authority of 10
                                           summarized as follows:                                                                                        U.S.C. 2913. Ten respondents submitted
                                             The purpose of this final rule is to                  239.7401    Definitions.                              public comments in response to the
                                           amend the Defense Federal Acquisition                   *      *     *       *       *                        proposed rule.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 May 09, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00045   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM   10MYR1


                                           28734               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           II. Discussion and Analysis                             suggested that the rule be revised to                 contract services that will accelerate the
                                              DoD reviewed the public comments in                  state the following: ‘‘The contracting                use of such contracts. DoD is authorized
                                           the development of the final rule. A                    officer may enter into a contract under               by section 2913 to contract with utility
                                           discussion of the comments received                     10 U.S.C. 2913 or 10 U.S.C. 2866 for a                service providers to implement energy
                                           and the changes made to the rule as a                   period not to exceed 25 years.’’                      conservation measures on military
                                           result of those comments follows:                         Response: The recommendation is                     bases. Section 2913 does not indicate a
                                                                                                   beyond the scope of the case.                         term limit for contracts or activities
                                           A. Summary of Significant Changes                                                                             executed under this authority, and this
                                           From the Proposed Rule                                  4. Application of 10 U.S.C. 2913 to
                                                                                                   Agreements With Gas or Electric                       has created ambiguity and inconsistency
                                             The final rule has been revised at                    Utilities                                             throughout DoD on the term limit that
                                           DFARS 241.103(2) to provide that the                                                                          is imposed on contracts awarded under
                                           contracting officer may enter into an                      Comment: One respondent stated that                the authority. Additionally, the
                                           energy savings contract under 10 U.S.C.                 10 U.S.C. 2913 applies not only to                    ambiguity has resulted in a hesitation to
                                           2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years.               shared energy savings contracts, but also             enter shared energy savings contracts,
                                           This change to ‘‘energy savings                         to agreements with gas or electric                    contrary to the intent of section 2913.
                                           contract’’ from ‘‘shared energy savings                 companies, and recommended removing                      No comments were received from the
                                           contract’’ brings the term limit for all                the reference to shared energy savings                public regarding the initial regulatory
                                           activities authorized by section 2913                   contracts.                                            flexibility analysis.
                                                                                                      Response: The final rule has been                     The rule is not anticipated to have a
                                           under the final rule.
                                                                                                   revised at 241.103(2) to provide that the             significant economic impact on small
                                           B. Analysis of Public Comments                          contracting officer may enter into an                 business entities. The number of
                                                                                                   energy savings contract under 10 U.S.C.               contract awards made under the
                                           1. General Support for the Rule
                                                                                                   2913 for a period not to exceed 25 years.             authority of 10 U.S.C. 2913 is not
                                             Comment: Several respondents                                                                                currently tracked by DoD’s business
                                           expressed support for the changes in the                III. Applicability to Contracts at or
                                                                                                   Below the Simplified Acquisition                      systems. However, it is estimated that
                                           proposed rule, indicating that the term                                                                       approximately 25 shared energy savings
                                           limit of 25 years would promote the use                 Threshold and for Commercial Items,
                                                                                                   Including Commercially Available Off-                 projects are initiated across DoD each
                                           of shared energy savings contracts, have                                                                      year, with approximately 17 being
                                           a positive benefit on small businesses,                 the-Shelf Items
                                                                                                                                                         awarded annually. It is believed that
                                           facilitate greater partnerships between                    This rule does not add any new                     most awards are made to large utility
                                           utilities and DoD customers, and                        provisions or clauses or impact any                   providers, with generally 25% or more
                                           increase competition. One respondent                    existing provisions or clauses.                       of the renovation and operations and
                                           indicated that the term limit of 25 years                                                                     maintenance work executed under the
                                                                                                   IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
                                           would lead to several benefits including                                                                      awards being subcontracted to local
                                           deeper retrofits, elimination of cream                     Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
                                                                                                                                                         small business by the utility provider.
                                           skimming, effectively leveraging private                13563 direct agencies to assess all costs                This rule does not create any new
                                           sector funding, and accomplishing the                   and benefits of available regulatory                  reporting or recordkeeping
                                           President’s Performance Contracting                     alternatives and, if regulation is                    requirements.
                                           Challenge goals.                                        necessary, to select regulatory                          There are no known significant
                                             Response: Noted.                                      approaches that maximize net benefits                 alternatives to the rule.
                                                                                                   (including potential economic,
                                           2. Clarification of the Contract Period                 environmental, public health and safety               VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
                                              Comment: One respondent requested                    effects, distributive impacts, and                      The rule does not contain any
                                           clarification of the date that the contract             equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the                    information collection requirements that
                                           period commences. The respondent                        importance of quantifying both costs                  require the approval of the Office of
                                           stated that the rule would most                         and benefits, of reducing costs, of                   Management and Budget under the
                                           effectively accomplish its goal of                      harmonizing rules, and of promoting                   Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
                                           accommodating project financing needs                   flexibility. This is not a significant                chapter 35).
                                           if the contract period were tied to the                 regulatory action and, therefore, was not
                                           payment term, and suggested that the                    subject to review under section 6(b) of               List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 241
                                           rule be revised to state the following:                 E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and                     Government procurement.
                                           ‘‘The contracting officer may enter into                Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
                                                                                                                                                         Jennifer L. Hawes,
                                           a shared energy savings contract under                  rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
                                           10 U.S.C. 2913 for a ‘payment term’ not                 804.                                                  Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
                                                                                                                                                         System.
                                           to exceed 25 years.’’
                                              Response: Payment term is                            V. Regulatory Flexibility Act                           Therefore, 48 CFR part 241 is
                                           interpreted as the performance period of                  A final regulatory flexibility analysis             amended as follows:
                                           the contract, which is not to exceed 25                 (FRFA) has been prepared consistent
                                           years. The contract period will include                 with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5                PART 241—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY
                                           the entire performance period,                          U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is                       SERVICES
                                           including construction, if any.                         summarized as follows:
                                                                                                     This final rule amends the Defense                  ■ 1. The authority citation for part 241
                                           3. Inclusion of Water-Related Projects                  Federal Acquisition Regulation                        continues to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                             Comment: One respondent expressed                     Supplement (DFARS) to clarify the                       Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
                                           concern that the rule’s failure to address              contract term for contracts awarded                   chapter 1.
                                           water-related projects authorized by 10                 under the statutory authority of 10                   ■ 2. Amend section 241.103 by—
                                           U.S.C. 2866 would result in ambiguity                   U.S.C. 2913. Section 2913 requires DoD                ■ a. Redesignating paragraphs (2) and
                                           and confusion with regard to the term                   to develop a simplified method of                     (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4); and
                                           limit for such contracts. The respondent                contracting for shared energy savings                 ■ b. Adding a new paragraph (2).



                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 May 09, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00046   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM   10MYR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                                28735

                                               The addition reads as follows:                        (2) The contracting officer may enter               U.S.C. 2913 for a period not to exceed
                                                                                                   into an energy savings contract under 10              25 years.
                                           241.103    Statutory and delegated authority.
                                                                                                                                                         *    *    *      *     *
                                           *      *     *       *      *                                                                                 [FR Doc. 2016–10824 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                         BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:17 May 09, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00047   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM   10MYR1



Document Created: 2016-05-10 05:18:31
Document Modified: 2016-05-10 05:18:31
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesEffective May 10, 2016.
ContactMs. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372- 6106.
FR Citation81 FR 28733 
RIN Number0750-AI74

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR