81 FR 28770 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 90 (May 10, 2016)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 90 (May 10, 2016)
| Page Range | 28770-28774 | |
| FR Document | 2016-10735 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 28770-28774] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-10735] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2016-6417; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-134-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10 and DC-10-10F airplanes, Model DC-10- 15 airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer and multiple reports of fuel pump housing electrical connector failures related to ingress of airplane fluids. This proposed AD would require replacement of the fuel pump housing electrical connector or replacement of the fuel pump housing; repetitive inspections for proper operation and corrective actions if necessary; and revising the maintenance or inspection program to incorporate new airworthiness limitations. This proposed AD would also require, for certain airplanes, a general visual inspection of the protective cap and replacement if necessary. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the fuel pump housing electrical connector, which could result in a potential ignition source in a fuel tank and consequent fire or explosion. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 24, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For The Boeing Company service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, CA 90846-0001; phone: 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax: 206-766-5683; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. For Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc. service information identified in this NPRM, contact Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc.: 3000 Winona Avenue, Burbank, CA [[Page 28771]] 91510-7722; phone: 818-526-2500; fax: 818-526-5658; email: [email protected]. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425- 227-1221. Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-264, dated May 15, 2015; and Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-28-146, dated May 15, 2015; are also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6417. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 6417; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Kush, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5263; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-6417; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-134-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements'' (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,'' Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83). Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews. In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address the failure types under evaluation: single failures, combination of failures, and unacceptable (failure) experience. For all three failure criteria, the evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for further action. We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. We have received multiple reports of fuel pump housing electrical connector failures related to ingress of airplane fluids. Currently installed fuel pump housing electrical connectors have 18 month repetitive inspection requirements related to AD 2011-11-05, Amendment 39-16704 (76 FR 31462, dated June 1, 2011) (``AD 2011-11-05''), and AD 2002-13-10, Amendment 39-12798 (67 FR 45053, dated July 8, 2002) (``AD 2002-13-10''). An improved fuel pump housing electrical connector has been developed to supersede the currently installed fuel pump housing electrical connector. Additionally, a secondary option has been developed that allows the operator to replace the fuel pump housing. In addition to the new fuel pump housing electrical connector, the use of environmentally sealed terminal lugs will help to prevent the wicking of airplane fluids into the fuel pump wires and the fuel pump housing electrical connector. This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of the fuel pump housing electrical connector, causing a potential ignition source in a fuel tank and consequent fire or explosion. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed the following service information. Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-264, dated May 15, 2015. The service information describes procedures for replacement of the fuel pump housing electrical connector with a new fuel pump housing electrical connector or replacement of the fuel pump housing. The service information also describes procedures for inspections for proper operation and corrective actions if necessary. Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-28-146, dated May 15, 2015. The service information describes procedures for replacement of the fuel pump housing electrical connector with a new fuel pump housing electrical connector or replacement of the fuel pump housing. The service information also describes procedures for inspections for proper operation and corrective actions if necessary. Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc. Service Bulletin 60-843/845-28-2, dated October 1, 2014. The service information describes procedures for a general visual inspection of the protective cap and replacement if necessary. Appendixes B, C, and D of Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report MDC-02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, 2015, which include Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), Airworthiness Limitation Instructions (ALIs), and short-term extensions. [[Page 28772]] This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Other Relevant Rulemaking AD 2000-22-21, Amendment 39-11969 (65 FR 69658, dated November 20, 2000) (``AD 2000-22-21''), applies to all The Boeing Company Model DC- 10, Model MD-10, and Model MD-11 series airplanes. AD 2000-22-21 requires revising the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to ensure that the flight crew is advised of appropriate procedures for disabling certain fuel pump electrical circuits following failure of a fuel pump electrical connector. For certain airplanes, AD 2000-22-21 also requires revising the AFM to prohibit resetting of tripped fuel pump circuit breakers. AD 2000-22-21 was prompted by reports of four incidents on McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 and MD-11 series airplanes, in which a short circuit occurred in the electrical connector between the power lead and the housing of a fuel pump. The circuit breaker did not trip in any of these incidents because the electrical arcing that occurred was shorter in duration than necessary for the circuit breaker to detect the arcing and open the circuit. We issued AD 2000-22-21 to prevent continued arcing following a short circuit of the fuel pump electrical connector, which could damage the conduit that protects the power lead inside the fuel tank, and result in the creation of a potential ignition source in the fuel tank. AD 2002-13-10 applies to certain The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10, -10F, -15, -30, -30F, -30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), -40, and -40F airplanes; Model MD-10-10F and -30F airplanes; and Model MD-11 and -11F airplanes. AD 2002-13-10 requires repetitive tests for electrical continuity and resistance and repetitive inspections to detect discrepancies of the fuel boost/transfer pump connectors; and corrective actions, if necessary. AD 2002-13-10 was prompted by reports of five instances of failed connectors in the fuel boost/transfer pump circuit on The Boeing Company Model DC-10 and MD-11 series airplanes. We issued AD 2002-13-10 to prevent arcing of connectors in the fuel boost/transfer pump circuit, which could result in a fire or explosion of the fuel tank. AD 2003-07-14, Amendment 39-13110 (68 FR 17544, dated April 10, 2003), applies to a single The Boeing Company Model DC-10-30 airplane. AD 2003-07-14 requires repetitive tests for electrical continuity and resistance and repetitive inspections to detect discrepancies of the fuel boost/transfer pump connectors; and corrective actions, if necessary. AD 2003-07-14 was prompted by reports of five instances of failed connectors in the fuel boost/transfer pump circuit on certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 and MD-11 series airplanes. We issued AD 2003-07-14 to prevent arcing of connectors in the fuel boost/transfer pump circuit, which could result in a fire or explosion of the fuel tank. AD 2008-06-21 R1, Amendment 39-16100 (74 FR 61504, November 25, 2009), applies to all McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-10-10 and DC-10-10F airplanes, Model DC-10-15 airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC- 10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. AD 2008-06-21 R1 requires revising the FAA-approved maintenance program, or the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, as applicable, to incorporate new AWLs for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. For certain airplanes, AD 2008-06-21 R1 also requires the initial accomplishment of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if necessary. AD 2008-06-21 R1 clarifies the intended effect of the AD on spare and on-airplane fuel tank system components. AD 2008-06-21 R1 was prompted by a design review of the fuel tank system. We issued AD 2008- 06-21 R1 to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. AD 2011-11-05 applies to all The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10, DC- 10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40, DC-10-40F; Model MD-10-10F, MD-10-30F, MD-11, and MD-11F airplanes. AD 2011-11-05 requires replacing the fuel pump housing electrical connector assembly with a new part and doing repetitive inspections for continuity, resistance, and insulation resistance, and doing corrective actions if necessary. AD 2011-11-05 was prompted by reports of failures of a certain fuel pump housing electrical connector. We issued AD 2011- 11-05 to detect and correct insulation resistance degradation and arcing in the potted backside of the electrical connector assembly of the fuel boost/transfer pump housing, which could compromise its performance and cause an ignition source in the fuel tank, resulting in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. FAA's Determination We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type designs. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require replacement of the fuel pump housing electrical connector or replacement of the fuel pump housing. This proposed AD would also require, for certain airplanes, a general visual inspection of the protective cap and replacement if necessary. This proposed AD would also require repetitive inspections for proper operation of the fuel pump and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD would also require revising the maintenance or inspection program to incorporate new airworthiness limitations. This proposed AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and CDCCLs. Compliance with these actions and CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by this AD, the operator may not be able to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (l) of this AD. The request should include a description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane. Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements, components that have been identified as airworthy or installed on the affected airplanes before accomplishing the revision of the airplane maintenance or inspection program specified in this proposed AD, do not need to be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs. However, once the airplane maintenance or inspection program has been revised as required by this proposed AD, future maintenance actions on these components must be done in accordance with the CDCCLs. [[Page 28773]] The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD. ``Corrective actions'' correct or address any condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for example, repairs. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD affects 246 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: Estimated Costs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Option 1: Replace connectors 68 work-hours x $85 $54,842....................... $60,622....................... $7,395,884. (including inspection) (122 Model per hour = $5,780. DC-10, and MD-10 airplanes.). Option 1: Replace connectors 59 work-hours x $85 $67,031....................... $72,046....................... $8,933,704. (including inspection) (124 Model per hour = $5,015. MD-11 airplanes.). Option 2: Replace fuel pump Up to 81 work-hours x Up to $54,842................. Up to $61,727................. Up to $7,530,694. housings (122 Model DC-10, and MD- $85 per hour = 10 airplanes.). $6,885. Option 2: Replace fuel pump 77 work-hours x $85 $67,031....................... $73,576....................... $9,123,424. housings (124 Model MD-11 per hour = $6,545. airplanes.). Maintenance or inspection program 1 work-hour x $85 per $0............................ $85........................... $20,910. revision. hour = $85. Inspection for proper operation... Up to 130 work-hours $0............................ Up to $11,050................. Up to $2,718,300. x $85 per hour = $11,050. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition replacement and corrective actions specified in this proposed AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2016-6417; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-134-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by June 24, 2016. (b) Affected ADs This AD affects AD 2000-22-21, Amendment 39-11969 (65 FR 69658, dated November 20, 2000); AD 2002-13-10, Amendment 39-12798 (67 FR 45053, dated July 8, 2002); AD 2003-07-14, Amendment 39-13110 (68 FR 17544, dated April 10, 2003); AD 2008-06-21 R1, Amendment 39-16100 (74 FR 61504, November 25, 2009); and AD 2011-11-05, Amendment 39- 16704 (76 FR 31462, dated June 1, 2011). (c) Applicability This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model DC-10-10 and DC- 10-10F airplanes, Model DC-10-15 airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC- 10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes, certificated in any category. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by multiple reports of fuel pump housing electrical connector failures related to ingress of airplane fluids. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the fuel pump housing electrical connector, which could result in a potential ignition source in a fuel tank and consequent fire or explosion. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. [[Page 28774]] (g) Replacement Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do the actions required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. (1) Do a replacement of the fuel pump housing electrical connector with a new fuel pump housing electrical connector, including doing a general visual inspection of the protective cap for a spring and applicable replacement of the protective cap, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-264, dated May 15, 2015; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-28-145, dated May 15, 2015, as applicable; and Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc. Service Bulletin 60-843/845-28-2, dated October 1, 2014. (2) Do a replacement of the fuel boost pump housing with a new fuel boost pump housing, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-264, dated May 15, 2015; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-28-146, dated May 15, 2015, as applicable. (h) Repetitive Inspections Within 24 months after accomplishing the replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do an inspection for proper operation of the fuel pump and all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with Appendix A, ``24 Month Repetitive Inspection,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin DC10-28-264, dated May 15, 2015; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11-28-146, dated May 15, 2015; as applicable. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months. (i) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision Within 30 days after accomplishing the replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, revise the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), Airworthiness Limitation Instructions (ALIs), and short-term extensions specified in Appendices B, C, and D of Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item (SCI) Report MDC-02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, 2015. The initial compliance time for accomplishing the actions specified in the ALIs is at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD. Revising the maintenance or inspection program required by this paragraph terminates the requirements in paragraphs (g) and (h) of AD 2008-06-21 R1, Amendment 39-16100 (74 FR 61504, November 25, 2009). (1) At the applicable time specified in Appendix C of Boeing Trijet SCI Report MDC-02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, 2015, except as provided by Appendix D of Boeing Trijet SCI Report MDC- 02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, 2015. (2) Within 30 days after accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (j) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or CDCCLs After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. (k) Terminating Action for Certain Paragraphs of Other ADs Accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the requirements specified in paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2), (k)(3), and (k)(4) of this AD for that airplane only. (1) The actions required by paragraph (a) of AD 2000-22-21, Amendment 39-11969 (65 FR 69658, dated November 20, 2000). (2) The actions required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD 2002- 13-10, Amendment 39-12798 (67 FR 45053, dated July 8, 2002). (3) The actions required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD 2003- 07-14, Amendment 39-13110 (68 FR 17544, dated April 10, 2003). (4) The actions required by paragraph (j) of AD 2011-11-05, Amendment 39-16704 (76 FR 31462, dated June 1, 2011). (l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO to make those findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (l)(4)(ii) of this AD apply. (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and identified figures. (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. (m) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Philip Kush, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5263; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. (2) For The Boeing Company service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, CA 90846-0001; phone: 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax: 206- 766-5683; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (3) For Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc. service information identified in this AD, contact Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc.: 3000 Winona Avenue, Burbank, CA 91510-7722; phone: 818-526-2500; fax: 818-526-5658; email: [email protected]. (4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Issued in Renton, WA, on April 27, 2016. Dionne Palermo, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016-10735 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![28770 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 has the authority to approve AMOCs for this Notice of proposed rulemaking
ACTION:
AD, if requested using the procedures found (NPRM).
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
safety, Incorporation by reference, 39.19, send your request to your principal SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
Safety. inspector or local Flight Standards District airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Office, as appropriate. If sending information Boeing Company Model DC–10–10 and
The Proposed Amendment directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: DC–10–10F airplanes, Model DC–10–15
Accordingly, under the authority Program Manager, Continuing Operational airplanes, Model DC–10–30 and DC–10–
delegated to me by the Administrator, Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
30F (KC–10A and KDC–10) airplanes,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part Model DC–10–40 and DC–10–40F
39 as follows: telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify airplanes, Model MD–10–10F and MD–
your appropriate principal inspector, or 10–30F airplanes, and Model MD–11
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of and MD–11F airplanes. This proposed
DIRECTIVES
the local flight standards district office/ AD was prompted by results from fuel
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 certificate holding district office. The AMOC system reviews conducted by the
approval letter must specifically reference manufacturer and multiple reports of
continues to read as follows:
this AD. fuel pump housing electrical connector
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any failures related to ingress of airplane
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
§ 39.13 [Amended] actions from a manufacturer, the action must
fluids. This proposed AD would require
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding be accomplished using a method approved replacement of the fuel pump housing
the following new airworthiness by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170, electrical connector or replacement of
directive (AD): FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation the fuel pump housing; repetitive
(TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design inspections for proper operation and
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2016– Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by corrective actions if necessary; and
6415; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM– the DAO, the approval must include the revising the maintenance or inspection
178–AD. DAO-authorized signature. program to incorporate new
(a) Comments Due Date (i) Related Information airworthiness limitations. This
We must receive comments by June 24, (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing proposed AD would also require, for
2016. Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian certain airplanes, a general visual
(b) Affected ADs Airworthiness Directive CF–2015–20, dated inspection of the protective cap and
July 21, 2015, for related information. This replacement if necessary. We are
None.
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the proposing this AD to prevent failure of
(c) Applicability Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by the fuel pump housing electrical
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– connector, which could result in a
CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, 2016–6415. potential ignition source in a fuel tank
(2) For service information identified in
& 702) airplanes, certificated in any category, and consequent fire or explosion.
serial numbers 10002 and subsequent. this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Côte-
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Québec H4S 1Y9, DATES: We must receive comments on
(d) Subject Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– this proposed AD by June 24, 2016.
Air Transport Association (ATA) of 855–7401; email thd.crj@ ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
America Code 34, Navigation. aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// using the procedures found in 14 CFR
www.bombardier.com. You may view this 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
(e) Reason service information at the FAA, Transport methods:
This AD was prompted by two in-service Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
incidents of a loss of all air data information Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
in the flight deck. We are issuing this AD to instructions for submitting comments.
prevent loss of control when a loss of all air 425–227–1221.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
data information has occurred in the flight Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28, • Mail: U.S. Department of
deck. 2016. Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
(f) Compliance Dionne Palermo, 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
Comply with this AD within the Acting Manager, Transport Airplane W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
compliance times specified, unless already Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Washington, DC 20590.
done. [FR Doc. 2016–10734 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am] • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
(g) Airplane Flight Manual Revision BILLING CODE 4910–13–P address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the emergency procedures
Federal holidays.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION For The Boeing Company service
section of the airplane flight manual (AFM)
by incorporating Section 03–19, Unreliable information identified in this NPRM,
Federal Aviation Administration contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Airspeed, Revision 15, dated March 16, 2015,
of Chapter 3, Emergency Procedures, in the Attention: Data & Services Management,
Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet Model 14 CFR Part 39 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–
CL–600–2C10 Airplane Flight Manual CSP [Docket No. FAA–2016–6417; Directorate 0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001;
B–012, Revision 16A, dated November 6,
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Identifier 2015–NM–134–AD] phone: 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax:
2015. 206–766–5683; Internet https://
RIN 2120–AA64
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions www.myboeingfleet.com.
The following provisions also apply to this Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing For Crane Aerospace & Electronics,
AD: Company Airplanes Hydro-Aire, Inc. service information
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance identified in this NPRM, contact Crane
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft AGENCY:Federal Aviation Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire,
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, Administration (FAA), DOT. Inc.: 3000 Winona Avenue, Burbank, CA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:20 May 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_28860/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules 28773
The phrase ‘‘corrective actions’’ is an AD could include, for example, Costs of Compliance
used in this proposed AD. ‘‘Corrective repairs. We estimate that this proposed AD
actions’’ correct or address any affects 246 airplanes of U.S. registry.
condition found. Corrective actions in We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
Option 1: Replace connectors (including inspec- 68 work-hours × $85 per $54,842 .................. $60,622 .................. $7,395,884.
tion) (122 Model DC–10, and MD–10 air- hour = $5,780.
planes.).
Option 1: Replace connectors (including inspec- 59 work-hours × $85 per $67,031 .................. $72,046 .................. $8,933,704.
tion) (124 Model MD–11 airplanes.). hour = $5,015.
Option 2: Replace fuel pump housings (122 Up to 81 work-hours × Up to $54,842 ........ Up to $61,727 ........ Up to $7,530,694.
Model DC–10, and MD–10 airplanes.). $85 per hour = $6,885.
Option 2: Replace fuel pump housings (124 77 work-hours × $85 per $67,031 .................. $73,576 .................. $9,123,424.
Model MD–11 airplanes.). hour = $6,545.
Maintenance or inspection program revision ......... 1 work-hour × $85 per $0 ........................... $85 ......................... $20,910.
hour = $85.
Inspection for proper operation .............................. Up to 130 work-hours × $0 ........................... Up to $11,050 ........ Up to $2,718,300.
$85 per hour =
$11,050.
We have received no definitive data For the reasons discussed above, I (a) Comments Due Date
that would enable us to provide cost certify this proposed regulation: We must receive comments by June 24,
estimates for the on-condition (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 2016.
replacement and corrective actions action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (b) Affected ADs
specified in this proposed AD.
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under This AD affects AD 2000–22–21,
Authority for This Rulemaking the DOT Regulatory Policies and Amendment 39–11969 (65 FR 69658, dated
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, November 20, 2000); AD 2002–13–10,
Title 49 of the United States Code 1979), Amendment 39–12798 (67 FR 45053, dated
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation July 8, 2002); AD 2003–07–14, Amendment
in Alaska, and 39–13110 (68 FR 17544, dated April 10,
section 106, describes the authority of 2003); AD 2008–06–21 R1, Amendment 39–
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: (4) Will not have a significant
16100 (74 FR 61504, November 25, 2009);
Aviation Programs, describes in more economic impact, positive or negative,
and AD 2011–11–05, Amendment 39–16704
detail the scope of the Agency’s on a substantial number of small entities
(76 FR 31462, dated June 1, 2011).
authority. under the criteria of the Regulatory
We are issuing this rulemaking under Flexibility Act. (c) Applicability
the authority described in Subtitle VII, List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 This AD applies to all The Boeing
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Company Model DC–10–10 and DC–10–10F
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation airplanes, Model DC–10–15 airplanes, Model
section, Congress charges the FAA with safety, Incorporation by reference, DC–10–30 and DC–10–30F (KC–10A and
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Safety. KDC–10) airplanes, Model DC–10–40 and
DC–10–40F airplanes, Model MD–10–10F
air commerce by prescribing regulations The Proposed Amendment and MD–10–30F airplanes, and Model MD–
for practices, methods, and procedures
Accordingly, under the authority 11 and MD–11F airplanes, certificated in any
the Administrator finds necessary for
category.
safety in air commerce. This regulation delegated to me by the Administrator,
is within the scope of that authority the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (d) Subject
because it addresses an unsafe condition 39 as follows: Air Transport Association (ATA) of
that is likely to exist or develop on America Code 28, Fuel.
products identified in this rulemaking PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
action. DIRECTIVES (e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple reports
Regulatory Findings ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 of fuel pump housing electrical connector
We determined that this proposed AD continues to read as follows: failures related to ingress of airplane fluids.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
would not have federalism implications
the fuel pump housing electrical connector,
under Executive Order 13132. This
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 39.13 [Amended] which could result in a potential ignition
proposed AD would not have a
source in a fuel tank and consequent fire or
substantial direct effect on the States, on ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
explosion.
the relationship between the national the following new airworthiness
Government and the States, or on the directive (AD): (f) Compliance
distribution of power and The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– Comply with this AD within the
responsibilities among the various 2016–6417; Directorate Identifier 2015– compliance times specified, unless already
levels of government. NM–134–AD. done.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:20 May 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_28860/page/4.svg)
![28774 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(g) Replacement (j) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or accordance with the operator’s maintenance
Within 36 months after the effective date CDCCLs or inspection program without obtaining
of this AD, do the actions required by After the maintenance or inspection approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
program has been revised as required by including substeps and identified figures, can
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD.
paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative still be done as specified, and the airplane
(1) Do a replacement of the fuel pump
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or can be put back in an airworthy condition.
housing electrical connector with a new fuel
pump housing electrical connector, including CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, (m) Related Information
doing a general visual inspection of the intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in (1) For more information about this AD,
protective cap for a spring and applicable contact Philip Kush, Aerospace Engineer,
accordance with the procedures specified in
replacement of the protective cap, in Propulsion Branch, ANM–140L, FAA, Los
paragraph (l) of this AD.
accordance with the Accomplishment Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin (k) Terminating Action for Certain 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA
DC10–28–264, dated May 15, 2015; or Boeing Paragraphs of Other ADs 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5263; fax: 562–
Service Bulletin MD11–28–145, dated May Accomplishing the actions required by 627–5210; email: Philip.kush@faa.gov.
15, 2015, as applicable; and Crane Aerospace paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the (2) For The Boeing Company service
& Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc. Service requirements specified in paragraphs (k)(1), information identified in this AD, contact
Bulletin 60–843/845–28–2, dated October 1, (k)(2), (k)(3), and (k)(4) of this AD for that Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention:
2014. airplane only. Data & Services Management, 3855
(2) Do a replacement of the fuel boost (1) The actions required by paragraph (a) Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800–0019, Long
pump housing with a new fuel boost pump of AD 2000–22–21, Amendment 39–11969 Beach, CA 90846–0001; phone: 206–544–
housing, in accordance with the (65 FR 69658, dated November 20, 2000). 5000, extension 2; fax: 206–766–5683;
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing (2) The actions required by paragraphs (a) Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Service Bulletin DC10–28–264, dated May and (b) of AD 2002–13–10, Amendment 39– (3) For Crane Aerospace & Electronics,
15, 2015; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11– 12798 (67 FR 45053, dated July 8, 2002). Hydro-Aire, Inc. service information
28–146, dated May 15, 2015, as applicable. (3) The actions required by paragraphs (a) identified in this AD, contact Crane
and (b) of AD 2003–07–14, Amendment 39– Aerospace & Electronics, Hydro-Aire, Inc.:
(h) Repetitive Inspections 13110 (68 FR 17544, dated April 10, 2003). 3000 Winona Avenue, Burbank, CA 91510–
Within 24 months after accomplishing the (4) The actions required by paragraph (j) of 7722; phone: 818–526–2500; fax: 818–526–
replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD 2011–11–05, Amendment 39–16704 (76 5658; email: CommSpares@
AD, do an inspection for proper operation of FR 31462, dated June 1, 2011). craneaerospace.com.
the fuel pump and all applicable corrective (4) You may view this referenced service
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
actions, in accordance with Appendix A, ‘‘24 information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
(AMOCs)
Month Repetitive Inspection,’’ of Boeing Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft WA. For information on the availability of
Service Bulletin DC10–28–264, dated May Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
15, 2015; or Boeing Service Bulletin MD11– this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
28–146, dated May 15, 2015; as applicable. requested using the procedures found in 14 Issued in Renton, WA, on April 27, 2016.
Do all applicable corrective actions before CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, Dionne Palermo,
further flight. Repeat the inspection send your request to your principal inspector Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 or local Flight Standards District Office, as Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
months. appropriate. If sending information directly
[FR Doc. 2016–10735 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
(i) Maintenance or Inspection Program BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
attention of the person identified in
Revision
paragraph (m)(1) of this AD. Information may
Within 30 days after accomplishing the be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC-
replacement required by paragraph (g) of this Requests@faa.gov. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AD, or within 30 days after the effective date (2) Before using any approved AMOC,
of this AD, whichever occurs later, revise the notify your appropriate principal inspector, Federal Aviation Administration
maintenance or inspection program, as or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
applicable, to incorporate the Critical Design of the local flight standards district office/ 14 CFR Part 39
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), certificate holding district office.
Airworthiness Limitation Instructions (ALIs), (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable [Docket No. FAA–2016–6426; Directorate
and short-term extensions specified in level of safety may be used for any repair, Identifier 2016–NM–023–AD]
Appendices B, C, and D of Boeing Trijet modification, or alteration required by this
RIN 2120–AA64
Special Compliance Item (SCI) Report MDC– AD if it is approved by the Boeing
02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, 2015. Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
The initial compliance time for Company Airplanes
accomplishing the actions specified in the been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO to make those findings. To be approved, AGENCY: Federal Aviation
ALIs is at the later of the times specified in
the repair method, modification deviation, or
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD.
alteration deviation must meet the
Administration (FAA), DOT.
Revising the maintenance or inspection ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
certification basis of the airplane, and the
program required by this paragraph approval must specifically refer to this AD. (NPRM).
terminates the requirements in paragraphs (g) (4) For service information that contains
and (h) of AD 2008–06–21 R1, Amendment steps that are labeled as Required for SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
39–16100 (74 FR 61504, November 25, 2009). Compliance (RC), the provisions of airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
(1) At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (l)(4)(ii) of this AD Boeing Company Model 737–300, -400,
Appendix C of Boeing Trijet SCI Report apply. and -500 series airplanes. This proposed
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
MDC–02K1003, Revision O, dated April 15, (i) The steps labeled as RC, including AD was prompted by reports of
2015, except as provided by Appendix D of substeps under an RC step and any figures
Boeing Trijet SCI Report MDC–02K1003,
intergranular cracks on the front spar
identified in an RC step, must be done to
Revision O, dated April 15, 2015. comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
chord lugs of the outboard horizontal
(2) Within 30 days after accomplishing the for any deviations to RC steps, including stabilizer. This proposed AD would
actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, substeps and identified figures. require repetitive inspections of the
or within 30 days after the effective date of (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be front spar chord lugs and lug bores of
this AD, whichever occurs later. deviated from using accepted methods in the horizontal stabilizer, and repair if
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:20 May 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10MYP1.SGM 10MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_28860/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2016-05-10 05:19:16
Document Modified: 2016-05-10 05:19:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 24, 2016. | |
| Contact | Philip Kush, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5263; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 28770 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR