81 FR 28824 - Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 90 (May 10, 2016)

Page Range		28824-28826
FR Document		2016-11034

The Department of Commerce (``Department'') preliminarily determines that Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India (``WSPP'') is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (``LTFV''), as provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). The period of investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28824-28826]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-86]

Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') preliminarily
determines that Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India (``WSPP'') is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair
value (``LTFV''), as provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''). The period of investigation (``POI'')
is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. The estimated weighted-average
dumping margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary
Determination'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary determination.

DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra, or Alex Rosen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3965, or (202) 482-7814, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department published the notice of initiation of this
investigation on October 27, 2015.\1\ For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the
memorandum that is dated concurrently with this determination and
hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ A list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov,
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 80 FR 65696 (October 27, 2015)
(``Initiation Notice'').
\2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe
from India'' (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion
to toll deadlines as a result of the closure of the Federal Government
for Snowstorm Jonas.\3\ All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding
have been extended by four business days. Furthermore, on March 3,
2016, based upon a request from Petitioners, the Department postponed
the time period for the preliminary determination of this investigation
by 40 days, to May 3, 2016, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ See Memorandum to the file from Ron Lorentzen, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Tolling of
Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure
during Snowstorm `Jonas,' '' dated January 27, 2016.
\4\ See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Postponement
of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 81
FR 11179 (March 3, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

The product covered by this investigation is circular welded
austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in
outside diameter, from India. For a full description of the scope of
this investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix
I.

Scope Comments

In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\5\
the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., ``scope'').\6\ No party
commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice, and the scope language is unchanged for this
preliminary determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296,
27323 (May 19, 1997).
\6\ See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 65696.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. For the two mandatory respondents Steamline
Industries Ltd (``Steamline'') and Sunrise Stainless Pvt. Ltd
(``Sunrise''), we calculated export price (EP) and constructed export
price (``CEP'') in accordance with section 772 of the Act, and normal
value (``NV'') in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all-
others rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de
minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776
of the Act. Because we calculated a de minimis weighted-average dumping
margin for Sunrise Stainless Pvt. Ltd. (``Sunrise''), we based the all-
others rate on the margin calculated for Steamline Industries Ltd.
(``Steamline''), the other mandatory respondent in this investigation.

Preliminary Determination

The Department preliminarily determines that the following
estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist:

[[Page 28825]]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steamline Industries Ltd.................................... 18.90
Sunrise Stainless Pvt. Ltd. and Sun Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd. *1.91
(collectively, ``Sunrise'') \7\............................
All Others.................................................. 18.90
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* (de minimis)

Suspension of Liquidation

In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of WSPP from India, with the exception of exports from Sunrise,
as described in the scope of the investigation section entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.205(d), we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the
weighted-average amount by which the NV exceeds CEP, as indicated in
the chart above \8\ adjusted where appropriate for export subsidies, as
follows: the rate for Steamline, when adjusted for export subsidies, is
16.90 percent; the rate for all others producers or exporters, when
adjusted for export subsidies, is also 16.90 percent. These suspension
of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ We have preliminarily determined to collapse Sunrise with
its affiliate Sun Mark Stainless Pvt, Ltd. (collectively,
``Sunrise''). See Memorandum to Brendan Quinn, Acting Director,
Office III, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation on Welded Stainless
Pressure Pipe from India: Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing
Memorandum for Sunrise Stainless Private Limited'' dated
concurrently with this notice.
\8\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

We will disclose the calculations performed to interested parties
in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties are
invited to comment on this preliminary determination. Case briefs or
other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on
which the final verification report is issued in this proceeding, and
rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case
briefs.\9\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged
to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce.
All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically-filed request must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.\10\ Requests should contain the
party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of
participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request
for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at
the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we intend to verify
information relied upon in making our final determination.

Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures

Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement
is made by exporters who account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by
Petitioners. 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that requests by respondents
for postponement of a final antidumping determination be accompanied by
a request for extension of provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not more than six months in duration.
On April 28, 2016, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.210(b) and (e), Sunrise
requested that, contingent upon an affirmative preliminary
determination of sales at LTFV, the Department postpone the final
determination and that provisional measures be extended to a period not
to exceed six months.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from Sunrise
``Extension Request for Final Determination'' (April 28, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), because (1) our preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter accounts for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling
reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination and
extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period
not greater than six months. Accordingly, we will make our final
determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of
this preliminary determination, pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the
Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\ See also 19 CFR 351.210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

International Trade Commission (``ITC'') Notification

In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our preliminary affirmative determination of sales at LTFV.
Because the preliminary determination in this proceeding is
affirmative, section 735(b)(2) of the Act requires that the ITC make
its final determination whether the domestic industry in the United
States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports of WSPP from India before the later of 120 days after
the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after our final
determination.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).

Dated: May 3, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

The merchandise covered by this investigation is circular welded
austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in
outside diameter. References to size are in nominal inches and
include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe
specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to,
the American Society for Testing and Materials (``ASTM'') A-312 or
ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign
specifications. ASTM A-358 products are only included when they are
produced to meet ASTM A-312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or
comparable domestic or foreign specifications.

[[Page 28826]]

Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: (1) Welded
stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A-554 or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger,
superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser
tubing, meeting ASTM A-249, ASTM A-688 or comparable domestic or
foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A-
269, ASTM A-270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings
7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and
7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044,
7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description
of the scope of this investigation is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing
V. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
VI. Scope of the Investigation
VII. Discussion of Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
VIII. Date of Sale
IX. Product Comparisons
X. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
XI. Normal Value
A. Comparison Market Viability
B. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production Analysis
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sale Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices
XII. Currency Conversion
XIII. Adjustment to Cash Deposit Rates
XIV. U.S. ITC Notification
XV. Disclosure and Public Comment
XVI. Verification
XVII. Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2016-11034 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

28824 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices

continues to govern business Background Scope of the Investigation
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written The Department published the notice The product covered by this
notification of the return or destruction of initiation of this investigation on investigation is circular welded
of APO materials or conversion to October 27, 2015.1 For a complete austenitic stainless pressure pipe not
judicial protective order is hereby description of the events that followed greater than 14 inches in outside
requested. Failure to comply with the the initiation of this investigation, see diameter, from India. For a full
regulations and the terms of an APO is the memorandum that is dated description of the scope of this
a sanctionable violation. concurrently with this determination investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
and hereby adopted by this notice.2 A Investigation,’’ in Appendix I.
Notification to Interested Parties list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is Scope Comments
This administrative review and notice
are issued and published in accordance included as Appendix II to this notice. In accordance with the preamble to
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of The Preliminary Decision Memorandum the Department’s regulations,5 the
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). is a public document and is on file Initiation Notice set aside a period of
electronically via Enforcement and time for parties to raise issues regarding
Dated: May 3, 2016.
Compliance’s Antidumping and product coverage (i.e., ‘‘scope’’).6 No
Paul Piquado, Countervailing Duty Centralized party commented on the scope of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
Compliance. investigation as it appeared in the
ACCESS is available to registered users Initiation Notice, and the scope
[FR Doc. 2016–11032 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am] at https://access.trade.gov, and to all language is unchanged for this
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P parties in the Central Records Unit, preliminary determination.
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a Methodology
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at The Department is conducting this
International Trade Administration investigation in accordance with section
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision 731 of the Act. For the two mandatory
[A–533–86] Memorandum and the electronic respondents Steamline Industries Ltd
version of the Preliminary Decision (‘‘Steamline’’) and Sunrise Stainless Pvt.
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From Ltd (‘‘Sunrise’’), we calculated export
Memorandum are identical in content.
India: Affirmative Preliminary price (EP) and constructed export price
Determination of Sales at Less Than As explained in the memorandum (‘‘CEP’’) in accordance with section 772
Fair Value and Postponement of Final from the Acting Assistant Secretary for of the Act, and normal value (‘‘NV’’) in
Determination Enforcement and Compliance, the accordance with section 773 of the Act.
Department exercised its discretion to For a full description of the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, toll deadlines as a result of the closure methodology underlying our
International Trade Administration, of the Federal Government for conclusions, see the Preliminary
Department of Commerce. Snowstorm Jonas.3 All deadlines in this Decision Memorandum.
segment of the proceeding have been
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
extended by four business days. All-Others Rate
(‘‘Department’’) preliminarily
Furthermore, on March 3, 2016, based
determines that Welded Stainless Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
upon a request from Petitioners, the
Pressure Pipe from India (‘‘WSPP’’) is provides that the estimated all-others
Department postponed the time period
being, or is likely to be, sold in the rate shall be an amount equal to the
for the preliminary determination of this
United States at less than fair value weighted average of the estimated
investigation by 40 days, to May 3,
(‘‘LTFV’’), as provided in section 733(b) weighted-average dumping margins
2016, in accordance with section
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended established for exporters and producers
733(c)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
(‘‘the Act’’). The period of investigation individually investigated, excluding any
351.205(f)(1).4
(‘‘POI’’) is July 1, 2014, through June 30, zero or de minimis margins, and any
2015. The estimated weighted-average 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: margins determined entirely under
dumping margins of sales at LTFV are Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 80 FR section 776 of the Act. Because we
shown in the ‘‘Preliminary 65696 (October 27, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). calculated a de minimis weighted-
Determination’’ section of this notice. 2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
average dumping margin for Sunrise
Interested parties are invited to Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Stainless Pvt. Ltd. (‘‘Sunrise’’), we based
comment on this preliminary Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the all-others rate on the margin
determination. Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the calculated for Steamline Industries Ltd.
Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping (‘‘Steamline’’), the other mandatory
DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2016. Duty Investigation of Welded Stainless Pressure
Pipe from India’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision respondent in this investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with this
James Terpstra, or Alex Rosen, AD/CVD notice. Preliminary Determination
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 3 See Memorandum to the file from Ron

Compliance, International Trade Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for The Department preliminarily
Administration, U.S. Department of Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Tolling of determines that the following estimated
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the weighted-average dumping margins
Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas,’ ’’ exist:
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; dated January 27, 2016.
telephone: (202) 482–3965, or (202) 4 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India:
5 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
482–7814, respectively. Postponement of Preliminary Determination of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 81 FR 11179 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (March 3, 2016). 6 See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 65696.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 May 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1

28826 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices

Excluded from the scope of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Methodology
investigation are: (1) Welded stainless
The Department is conducting this
mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or International Trade Administration review in accordance with section
comparable domestic or foreign
[A–533–823] 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger,
amended (the Act). For a full
superheater, refining furnace, feedwater Silicomanganese From India: description of the methodology
heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM Preliminary Results of Antidumping underlying our conclusions, see
A–249, ASTM A–688 or comparable Duty Administrative Review; 2014– Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) 2015 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, is a public document and is on file
ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or
foreign specifications. International Trade Administration, electronically via Enforcement and
The subject imports are normally classified U.S. Department of Commerce. Compliance’s Antidumping and
in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040,
Countervailing Duty Centralized
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
(the Department) is conducting an ACCESS is available to registered users
7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff administrative review of the
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). at https://access.trade.gov and in the
antidumping duty order on Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
They may also enter under HTSUS silicomanganese from India pursuant to
subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, the main Department of Commerce
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of building. In addition, a complete
7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, 1930, as amended (the Act).1 This
and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings version of the Preliminary Decision
review covers one company, Universal Memorandum can be accessed directly
are provided for convenience and customs Ferro and Allied Chemicals Ltd.
purposes only; the written description of the on the Internet at http://
(Universal). The period of review (POR) enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
scope of this investigation is dispositive. is May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015. The signed Preliminary Decision
We preliminarily find no evidence of Memorandum is identical in content.
Appendix II any reviewable entries, shipments, or
sales of subject merchandise by Preliminary Determination of No
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Shipments
Universal during the POR, and are
Decision Memorandum
therefore issuing a preliminary no Based on information Universal
I. Summary shipments determination. submitted after the initiation of this
II. Background administrative review, and due to the
DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2016.
III. Period of Investigation fact that we have not received any
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing information from U.S. Customs and
V. Postponement of Final Determination and
David Lindgren at (202) 482–3870; AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII, Border Protection (CBP) indicating that
Extension of Provisional Measures
Enforcement and Compliance, Universal had entries during the POR,
VI. Scope of the Investigation
International Trade Administration, the Department has preliminarily
VII. Discussion of Methodology
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th determined that the record evidence
A. Determination of Comparison Method
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., indicates that Universal had no
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Washington, DC 20230. reviewable entries during the POR. In
Analysis
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
addition, the Department finds that it is
VIII. Date of Sale
not appropriate to rescind the review
IX. Product Comparisons Scope of the Order with respect to Universal but, rather, to
X. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
The products subject to the order are complete the review and issue
XI. Normal Value
all forms, sizes and compositions of appropriate instructions to CBP based
A. Comparison Market Viability
silicomanganese, except low-carbon on the final results of review, as is our
B. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm’s-
silicomanganese, including practice.3
Length Test
C. Level of Trade silicomanganese briquettes, fines and Assessment Rates
D. Cost of Production Analysis slag. The silicomanganese subject to the
For entries of subject merchandise
1. Calculation of Cost of Production order is currently classifiable under
during the POR produced by Universal
2. Test of Comparison Market Sale Prices subheading 7202.30.0000 of the
which it did not know were destined for
3. Results of the COP Test Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
the United States, we instructed CBP to
E. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-
Market Prices subheading is provided for convenience
others rate if there was no rate for the
XII. Currency Conversion and customs purposes. A full
intermediate company or companies
XIII. Adjustment to Cash Deposit Rates description of the scope of the order is
involved in the transaction.4 We intend
XIV. U.S. ITC Notification contained in the Preliminary Decision
to issue assessment instructions directly
XV. Disclosure and Public Comment Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
XVI. Verification by this notice.2 The written description Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
XVII. Conclusion is dispositive. Order on Silicomanganese from India (Preliminary
[FR Doc. 2016–11034 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am] Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

1 See Initiation of Antidumping and this notice.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 3 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp

37588 (July 1, 2015) (Initiation). From Thailand: Preliminary Results of
2 For a full description of the scope of the order, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Intent To Revoke the Order (in Part); 2011–2012, 78
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and FR 15686 (March 12, 2013) and the accompanying
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Decision Memorandum at 7 to 8.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
Preliminary Results of the 2014–2015 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 May 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1

Document Created: 2016-05-10 05:18:46
Document Modified: 2016-05-10 05:18:46

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Contact		James Terpstra, or Alex Rosen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3965, or (202) 482-7814, respectively.
FR Citation		81 FR 28824

81 FR 28824 - Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEInternational Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 90 (May 10, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration