81 FR 35299 - Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 106 (June 2, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 106 (June 2, 2016)
| Page Range | 35299-35301 | |
| FR Document | 2016-12977 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 35299-35301] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-12977] [[Page 35299]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-583-857] Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that countervailable subsidies are not being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (corrosion- resistant steel) from Taiwan. DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang or Cindy Robinson, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 and (202) 482-3797, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Petitioners in this investigation are the United States Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., California Steel Industries, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, and AK Steel Corporation. This investigation covers 26 alleged government subsidy programs. The mandatory respondents in this investigation are (1) Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PT), and its crossed-own affiliates: Hong-Ye Steel Co., Ltd. (HY), Prosperity Did Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PD), and Chan Lin Enterprise Co., Ltd. (CL) (collectively the Prosperity Companies) and (2) Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), and its crossed-own affiliates: Yieh Corporation Limited (YCL); Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang); and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd (Synn) (collectively the Yieh Phui Companies). On November 6, 2015, the Department published its Preliminary Determination.\1\ For a description of the events that have occurred since the Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion- Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Preliminary Negative Countervailing Duty Determination, 80 FR 68852 (November 6, 2015) (Preliminary Determination). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigation The period of investigation for which we are measuring subsidies is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. Scope Comments In accordance with the Preliminary Scope Determination,\2\ the Department set aside a period of time for parties to address scope issues in case briefs or other written comments on scope issues. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,'' dated December 21, 2015 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). See also Memorandum to the File, ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Correction to Preliminary Determination Scope Memorandum,'' dated January 29, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal responses submitted on the record of this final determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final Determinations,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are corrosion-resistant steel products from Taiwan. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix II. Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice.\4\ A list of subsidy programs and the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix I. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Issue and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We determine the total estimated net countervailable subsidy rates to be: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Producer/Exporter Subsidy rate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PT); Hong-Ye Steel 0.00 percent ad valorem. Co., Ltd. (HY); Prosperity Did Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PD); and Chan Lin Enterprise Co., Ltd. (CL) (collectively Prosperity Companies). Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui); Yieh 0.00 percent ad valorem. Corporation Limited (YCL); Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang); and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd (Synn) (collectively Yieh Phui Companies). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because the total estimated net countervailable subsidy rates are zero, we determine that countervailable subsidies are not being provided to producers or exporters of corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. We have not calculated an all-others rate pursuant to sections 705(c)(1)(B) and (c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) because we have not reached an affirmative final determination. Because our final determination is negative, this proceeding is terminated in accordance with section 705(c)(2) of the Act. In the Preliminary Determination, the total net countervailable subsidy rates for the individually examined respondents were zero and, therefore, we did not suspend liquidation of entries of corrosion- resistant steel from Taiwan.\5\ Because the estimated subsidy rates for both examined companies are zero in this final determination, we are not directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Determination, 80 FR 68852. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 35300]] United States International Trade Commission (USITC) Notification In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the USITC of our final determination. Because our final determination is negative, this investigation is terminated. Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation that is subject to sanction. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: May 24, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I I. Summary II. Background A. Case History B. Period of Investigation III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Final Determination of Critical Circumstances VI. Subsidies Valuation A. Allocation Period B. Attribution of Subsidies C. Denominators VII. Benchmarks and Interest Rates VIII. Analysis of Programs A. Programs Determined To Be Not Countervailable 1. Provision of Cold-Rolled Steel and Hot-Rolled Steel for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) 2. Tariff Exemption for Imported Equipment Program 3. Income Tax Credit for Upgraded Equipment B. Programs Determined Not To Confer a Benefit During the POI 1. Loan Financing by the National Development Fund (NDF) 2. Provision of Land for LTAR for Eligible Firms Located in the Pingtung Industrial Park--a New Subsidy Allegation C. Programs Determined To Be Not Used IX. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether CSC Is a Government Authority Capable of Providing a Financial Contribution Comment 2: Whether the Department Should Use A ``Tier Two'' Benchmark To Measure the Benefit for Cold-Rolled Steel and Hot- Rolled Steel Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Further Investigate and Collect the Information Requested by AK Steel X. Conclusion Appendix II--Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are certain flat- rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or other shape and include products of either rectangular or non- rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been ``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced above: (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above, and (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product (e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross- section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies. Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:2.50 percent of manganese, or 3.30 percent of silicon, or 1.50 percent of copper, or 1.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 2.00 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or 0.30 percent of vanadium, or 0.30 percent of zirconium Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium. For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial- free (``IF'')) steels and high strength low alloy (``HSLA'') steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. Furthermore, this scope also includes Advanced High Strength Steels (``AHSS'') and Ultra High Strength Steels (``UHSS''), both of which are considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels. Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in- scope corrosion resistant steel. All products that meet the written physical description, and in which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted element levels listed above, are within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this investigation: Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne plate''), or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''), whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating; Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness; and Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are three-layered corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel products less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a flat-rolled steel product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%- 20% ratio. The products subject to the investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000. The products subject to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, [[Page 35301]] 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2016-12977 Filed 6-1-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices 35299
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE in this investigation are (1) Prosperity Scope Comments
Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PT), and its
International Trade Administration crossed-own affiliates: Hong-Ye Steel In accordance with the Preliminary
Co., Ltd. (HY), Prosperity Did Enterprise Scope Determination,2 the Department
[C–583–857]
Co., Ltd. (PD), and Chan Lin Enterprise set aside a period of time for parties to
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Co., Ltd. (CL) (collectively the address scope issues in case briefs or
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Prosperity Companies) and (2) Yieh other written comments on scope issues.
Products From Taiwan: Final Negative Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), For a summary of the product
Countervailing Duty Determination and its crossed-own affiliates: Yieh coverage comments and rebuttal
Corporation Limited (YCL); Shin Yang responses submitted on the record of
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang); and Synn
International Trade Administration, this final determination, and
Industrial Co., Ltd (Synn) (collectively accompanying discussion and analysis
Department of Commerce. the Yieh Phui Companies).
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce of all comments timely received, see the
On November 6, 2015, the Department
(the Department) determines that published its Preliminary Final Scope Decision Memorandum.3
countervailable subsidies are not being Determination.1 For a description of the Scope of the Investigation
provided to producers and exporters of events that have occurred since the
certain corrosion-resistant steel Preliminary Determination, see the The products covered by this
products (corrosion-resistant steel) from Issues and Decision Memorandum. The investigation are corrosion-resistant
Taiwan. Issues and Decision Memorandum is a steel products from Taiwan. For a
DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2016. public document and is on file complete description of the scope of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy electronically via Enforcement and investigation, see Appendix II.
Zhang or Cindy Robinson, Office III, Compliance’s Antidumping and
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Countervailing Duty Centralized Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Compliance, International Trade Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Comments Received
Administration, U.S. Department of ACCESS is available to registered users The subsidy programs under
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution at http://access.trade.gov and to all investigation and the issues raised in
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; parties in the Central Records Unit,
the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
telephone: (202) 482–1168 and (202) Room B8024 of the main Department of
482–3797, respectively. parties in this investigation are
Commerce building. In addition, a
addressed in the Issues and Decision
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed Memorandum, dated concurrently with
Background this notice.4 A list of subsidy programs
directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov.
The Petitioners in this investigation The signed and electronic versions of and the issues that parties raised, and to
are the United States Steel Corporation, the Issues and Decision Memorandum which we responded in the Decision
Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., are identical in content. Memorandum, is attached to this notice
California Steel Industries, as Appendix I.
ArcelorMittal USA LLC, and AK Steel Period of Investigation
We determine the total estimated net
Corporation. This investigation covers The period of investigation for which countervailable subsidy rates to be:
26 alleged government subsidy we are measuring subsidies is January 1,
programs. The mandatory respondents 2014, through December 31, 2014.
Producer/Exporter Subsidy rate
Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PT); Hong-Ye Steel Co., Ltd. (HY); Prosperity Did Enterprise Co., Ltd. (PD); 0.00 percent ad valorem.
and Chan Lin Enterprise Co., Ltd. (CL) (collectively Prosperity Companies).
Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui); Yieh Corporation Limited (YCL); Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang); 0.00 percent ad valorem.
and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd (Synn) (collectively Yieh Phui Companies).
Because the total estimated net reached an affirmative final entries of corrosion-resistant steel from
countervailable subsidy rates are zero, determination. Because our final Taiwan.5 Because the estimated subsidy
we determine that countervailable determination is negative, this rates for both examined companies are
subsidies are not being provided to proceeding is terminated in accordance zero in this final determination, we are
producers or exporters of corrosion- with section 705(c)(2) of the Act. not directing U.S. Customs and Border
resistant steel from Taiwan. We have In the Preliminary Determination, the Protection to suspend liquidation of
not calculated an all-others rate total net countervailable subsidy rates entries of corrosion-resistant steel from
pursuant to sections 705(c)(1)(B) and for the individually examined Taiwan.
(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as respondents were zero and, therefore,
amended (the Act) because we have not we did not suspend liquidation of
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain People’s Republic of China, India, Italy, the 3 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Scope Comments Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Preliminary Negative Countervailing Duty Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Scope Comments
Determination, 80 FR 68852 (November 6, 2015) Determinations,’’ dated December 21, 2015 Decision Memorandum for the Final
(Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). See
(Preliminary Determination). Determinations,’’ dated concurrently with this
also Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-
2 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate
Resistant Steel Products From the People’s Republic notice.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and 4 See Issue and Decision Memorandum.
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain Taiwan: Correction to Preliminary Determination 5 See Preliminary Determination, 80 FR 68852.
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Scope Memorandum,’’ dated January 29, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM 02JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35405/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices 35301
7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. companies are requested to complete
7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and imports during the period of review. We the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
7229.90.1000. intend to release the CBP data under for purposes of respondent selection, in
The HTSUS subheadings above are
provided for convenience and customs
Administrative Protective Order general each company must report
purposes only. The written description of the (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO volume and value data separately for
scope of the investigation is dispositive. within five days of publication of the itself. Parties should not include data
[FR Doc. 2016–12977 Filed 6–1–16; 8:45 am]
initiation notice and to make our for any other party, even if they believe
decision regarding respondent selection they should be treated as a single entity
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
within 21 days of publication of the with that other party. If a company was
initiation Federal Register notice. collapsed with another company or
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Therefore, we encourage all parties companies in the most recently
interested in commenting on respondent completed segment of this proceeding
International Trade Administration selection to submit their APO where the Department considered
applications on the date of publication collapsing that entity, complete quantity
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty of the initiation notice, or as soon and value data for that collapsed entity
Order, Finding, or Suspended thereafter as possible. The Department must be submitted.
Investigation; Opportunity To Request invites comments regarding the CBP
Administrative Review Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
data and respondent selection within
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, five days of placement of the CBP data
International Trade Administration, on the record of the review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
Department of Commerce. In the event the Department decides party that requests a review may
it is necessary to limit individual withdraw that request within 90 days of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: examination of respondents and the date of publication of the notice of
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD conduct respondent selection under initiation of the requested review. The
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: regulation provides that the Department
Enforcement and Compliance, In general, the Department finds that may extend this time if it is reasonable
International Trade Administration, determinations concerning whether to do so. In order to provide parties
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th particular companies should be additional certainty with respect to
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single when the Department will exercise its
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) entity for purposes of calculating discretion to extend this 90-day
482–4735. antidumping duty rates) require a deadline, interested parties are advised
Background substantial amount of detailed that, with regard to reviews requested
Each year during the anniversary information and analysis, which often on the basis of anniversary months on
month of the publication of an require follow-up questions and or after June 2016, the Department does
antidumping or countervailing duty analysis. Accordingly, the Department not intend to extend the 90-day
order, finding, or suspended will not conduct collapsing analyses at deadline unless the requestor
investigation, an interested party, as the respondent selection phase of this demonstrates that an extraordinary
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff review and will not collapse companies circumstance prevented it from
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), at the respondent selection phase unless submitting a timely withdrawal request.
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR there has been a determination to Determinations by the Department to
351.213, that the Department of collapse certain companies in a extend the 90-day deadline will be
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct previous segment of this antidumping made on a case-by-case basis.
an administrative review of that proceeding (i.e., investigation, The Department is providing this
antidumping or countervailing duty administrative review, new shipper notice on its Web site, as well as in its
order, finding, or suspended review or changed circumstances ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
investigation. review). For any company subject to this Review’’ notices, so that interested
All deadlines for the submission of review, if the Department determined, parties will be aware of the manner in
comments or actions by the Department or continued to treat, that company as which the Department intends to
discussed below refer to the number of collapsed with others, the Department exercise its discretion in the future.
calendar days from the applicable will assume that such companies Opportunity to Request a Review: Not
starting date. continue to operate in the same manner later than the last day of June 2016,1
and will collapse them for respondent interested parties may request
Respondent Selection selection purposes. Otherwise, the administrative review of the following
In the event the Department limits the Department will not collapse companies orders, findings, or suspended
number of respondents for individual for purposes of respondent selection. investigations, with anniversary dates in
examination for administrative reviews Parties are requested to (a) identify June for the following periods:
initiated pursuant to requests made for which companies subject to review
the orders identified below, the previously were collapsed, and (b) 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
Department intends to select provide a citation to the proceeding in on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
respondents based on U.S. Customs and which they were collapsed. Further, if when the Department is closed.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM 02JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35405/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-02 01:23:14
Document Modified: 2016-06-02 01:23:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Joy Zhang or Cindy Robinson, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 and (202) 482-3797, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 35299 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR