81 FR 35634 - Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Prong 4-2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 107 (June 3, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 107 (June 3, 2016)
| Page Range | 35634-35636 | |
| FR Document | 2016-13036 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 35634-35636] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-13036] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0072; FRL-9947-22-Region 4] Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Prong 4--2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2 , SO2 , and 2012 PM2.5 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving portions of revisions to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR), addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) visibility transport (prong 4) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2 ), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2 ), and 2012 annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure SIP.'' Specifically, EPA is approving the prong 4 portions of North Carolina's November 2, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone infrastructure SIP submission; August 23, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 infrastructure SIP submission; March 18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2 infrastructure SIP submission; and December 4, 2015, 2012 Annual PM2.5 infrastructure SIP submission. All other applicable infrastructure requirements for these SIP submissions have been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings. DATES: This rule is effective July 5, 2016. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0072. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Lakeman can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-9043 or via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background By statute, SIPs meeting the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA are to be submitted by states within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS to provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the new or revised NAAQS. EPA has historically referred to these SIP submissions made for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) as ``infrastructure SIP'' submissions. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIP elements such as the requirements for monitoring, basic program requirements, and legal authority that are designed to assure attainment and maintenance of the newly established or revised NAAQS. More specifically, section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing requirements for infrastructure SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements that states must meet for the infrastructure SIP requirements related to a newly established or revised NAAQS. The contents of an infrastructure SIP submission may vary depending upon the data and analytical tools available to the state, as well as the provisions already contained in the state's implementation plan at the time in which the state develops and submits the submission for a new or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2)(D) has two components: 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) includes four distinct components, commonly referred to as ``prongs,'' that must be addressed in infrastructure SIP submissions. The first two prongs, which are codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that prohibit any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in another state (prong 1) and from interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in another state (prong 2). The third and fourth prongs, which are codified in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that prohibit emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in another state (prong 3) or from interfering with measures to protect visibility in another state (prong 4). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs to include provisions ensuring compliance with sections 115 and 126 of the Act, relating to interstate and international pollution abatement. North Carolina's November 2, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone submission; August 23, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 submission; March 18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2 submission; and December 4, 2015, 2012 Annual PM2.5 submission cite to the State's regional haze SIP as satisfying prong 4 requirements. However, at those dates, EPA had not yet fully approved North Carolina's regional haze SIP because the SIP relied on the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) to satisfy the nitrogen oxides (NOX ) and SO2 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) requirements for the CAIR-subject electric generating units (EGUs) in the State and the requirement for a long- term strategy (LTS) sufficient to achieve the state-adopted reasonable progress goals.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ CAIR, promulgated in 2005, required 27 states and the District of Columbia to reduce emissions of NOX and SO2 that significantly contribute to, or interfere with maintenance of, the 1997 NAAQS for fine particulates and/or ozone in any downwind state. CAIR imposed specified emissions reduction requirements on each affected State, and established an EPA- administered cap and trade program for EGUs in which States could join as a means to meet these requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA demonstrated that CAIR achieved greater reasonable progress toward the national visibility goal than [[Page 35635]] BART for NOX and SO2 at BART-eligible EGUs in CAIR affected states, and revised the regional haze rule (RHR) to provide that states participating in CAIR's cap-and-trade program need not require affected BART-eligible EGUs to install, operate, and maintain BART for emissions of SO2 and NOX . See 70 FR 39104 (July 6, 2005). As a result, a number of states in the CAIR region designed their regional haze SIPs to rely on CAIR as an alternative to NOX and SO2 BART for CAIR-subject EGUs. These states also relied on CAIR as an element of a LTS for achieving their reasonable progress goals. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) initially vacated CAIR in 2008,\2\ but ultimately remanded the rule to EPA without vacatur to preserve the environmental benefits provided by CAIR.\3\ On August 8, 2011, acting on the D.C. Circuit's remand, EPA promulgated the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) to replace CAIR and thus to address the interstate transport of emissions contributing to nonattainment and interfering with maintenance of the two air quality standards covered by CAIR as well as the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.\4\ See 76 FR 48208. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008). \3\ North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 2008). \4\ Although a number of parties challenged the legality of CSAPR and the D.C. Circuit initially vacated and remanded CSAPR to EPA in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7, 38 (D.C. Cir. 2012), the United States Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's decision on April 29, 2014, and remanded the case to the D.C. Circuit to resolve remaining issues in accordance with the high court's ruling. EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1584 (2014). On remand, the D.C. Circuit affirmed CSAPR in most respects and CSAPR is now in effect. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 795 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Due to CAIR's status as a temporary measure following the D.C. Circuit's 2008 ruling, EPA could not fully approve regional haze SIP revisions to the extent that they relied on CAIR to satisfy the BART requirement and the requirement for a long-term strategy sufficient to achieve the state-adopted reasonable progress goals. On these grounds, EPA finalized a limited disapproval of North Carolina's regional haze SIP on June 7, 2012, triggering the requirement for EPA to promulgate a federal implementation plan (FIP) unless North Carolina submitted and EPA approved a SIP revision that corrected the deficiency. See 77 FR 33642. EPA finalized a limited approval of North Carolina's regional haze SIP on June 27, 2012, as meeting the remaining applicable regional haze requirements set forth in the CAA and the RHR. See 77 FR 38185. On October 31, 2014, North Carolina submitted a regional haze plan revision to correct the deficiencies identified in the June 7, 2012, limited disapproval by replacing reliance on CAIR with reliance on a BART alternative to satisfy NOX and SO2 BART requirements for EGUs formerly subject to CAIR. EPA finalized approval of the October 31, 2014, SIP revision and converted North Carolina's regional haze plan from a limited approval to a full approval on May 12, 2016. That action also removed EPA's obligation to implement a FIP to correct the previous deficiencies for North Carolina's initial regional haze plan. In a proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on April 8, 2016 (81 FR 20600), EPA proposed to approve the prong 4 portions of North Carolina's infrastructure SIP submissions for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour NO2 , 2010 1-hour SO2 , and 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS based on final approval of the State's October 31, 2014, SIP revision. As discussed above, EPA subsequently finalized that SIP revision and converted North Carolina's regional haze plan from a limited approval to a full approval. The details of the aforementioned North Carolina infrastructure SIP submissions and the rationale for EPA's action is explained in the NPRM. Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before April 29, 2016. EPA received no adverse comments on the proposed action. II. Final Action EPA is approving the prong 4 portions of North Carolina's November 2, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone infrastructure SIP submission; August 23, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 infrastructure SIP submission; March 18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2 infrastructure SIP submission; and December 4, 2015, 2012 Annual PM2.5 infrastructure SIP submission. All other applicable infrastructure requirements for these SIP submissions have been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a [[Page 35636]] report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 2, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: May 23, 2016. Heather McTeer Toney, Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II--North Carolina 0 2. Section 52.1770(e), is amended by adding new entries for ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO 2 NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS'' and ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.1770 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * EPA-Approved North Carolina Non-Regulatory Provisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State effective Federal Register Provision date EPA approval date citation Explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 11/2/2012 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of Addressing prong 4 Requirements for the 2008 8- publication in of section Hour Ozone NAAQS. Federal Register]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 8/23/2013 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of Addressing prong 4 Requirements for the 2010 1- publication in of section hour NO2 NAAQS. Federal Register]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 3/18/2014 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of Addressing prong 4 Requirements for the 2010 1- publication in of section hour SO2 NAAQS. Federal Register]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 12/4/2015 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of Addressing prong 4 Requirements for the 2012 publication in of section Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Federal Register]. 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-13036 Filed 6-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![35634 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Shared equipment includes, but is not listed in the index, some information infrastructure SIP submission may vary
limited to, produced fluids storage may not be publicly available, i.e., depending upon the data and analytical
tanks, phase separators, natural gas Confidential Business Information or tools available to the state, as well as the
dehydrators or emissions control other information whose disclosure is provisions already contained in the
devices. Surface site, as used in the restricted by statute. Certain other state’s implementation plan at the time
introductory text of this definition, has material, such as copyrighted material, in which the state develops and submits
the same meaning as in 40 CFR 63.761. is not placed on the Internet and will be the submission for a new or revised
* * * * * publicly available only in hard copy NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2016–11968 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] form. Publicly available docket Section 110(a)(2)(D) has two
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P materials are available either components: 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and
electronically through http:// 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at includes four distinct components,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the Air Regulatory Management Section, commonly referred to as ‘‘prongs,’’ that
AGENCY Air Planning and Implementation must be addressed in infrastructure SIP
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics submissions. The first two prongs,
40 CFR Part 52 Management Division, U.S. which are codified in section
Environmental Protection Agency, 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that
[EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0072; FRL–9947–22– prohibit any source or other type of
Region 4] Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA emissions activity in one state from
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; requests that if at all possible, you contributing significantly to
Prong 4—2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, contact the person listed in the FOR nonattainment of the NAAQS in another
and 2012 PM2.5 FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to state (prong 1) and from interfering with
schedule your inspection. The Regional maintenance of the NAAQS in another
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Office’s official hours of business are state (prong 2). The third and fourth
Agency. Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to prongs, which are codified in section
ACTION: Final rule. 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays. 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that
prohibit emissions activity in one state
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection from interfering with measures required
Agency (EPA) is approving portions of Sean Lakeman of the Air Regulatory
to prevent significant deterioration of air
revisions to the North Carolina State Management Section, Air Planning and
quality in another state (prong 3) or
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
from interfering with measures to
by the North Carolina Department of and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
protect visibility in another state (prong
Environment and Natural Resources (NC Environmental Protection Agency, 4). Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) requires SIPs
DENR), addressing the Clean Air Act Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., to include provisions ensuring
(CAA or Act) visibility transport (prong Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. compliance with sections 115 and 126
4) infrastructure SIP requirements for Lakeman can be reached by telephone at of the Act, relating to interstate and
the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour (404) 562–9043 or via electronic mail at international pollution abatement.
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010 1-hour lakeman.sean@epa.gov. North Carolina’s November 2, 2012,
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), and 2012 annual SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2008 8-hour Ozone submission; August
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National I. Background 23, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 submission;
Ambient Air Quality Standards March 18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2
(NAAQS). The CAA requires that each By statute, SIPs meeting the submission; and December 4, 2015,
state adopt and submit a SIP for the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 2012 Annual PM2.5 submission cite to
implementation, maintenance, and (2) of the CAA are to be submitted by the State’s regional haze SIP as
enforcement of each NAAQS states within three years after satisfying prong 4 requirements.
promulgated by EPA, commonly promulgation of a new or revised However, at those dates, EPA had not
referred to as an ‘‘infrastructure SIP.’’ NAAQS to provide for the yet fully approved North Carolina’s
Specifically, EPA is approving the prong implementation, maintenance, and regional haze SIP because the SIP relied
4 portions of North Carolina’s November enforcement of the new or revised on the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
2, 2012, 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS. EPA has historically referred to to satisfy the nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
infrastructure SIP submission; August these SIP submissions made for the SO2 Best Available Retrofit Technology
23, 2013, 2010 1-hour NO2 purpose of satisfying the requirements (BART) requirements for the CAIR-
infrastructure SIP submission; March of sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) as subject electric generating units (EGUs)
18, 2014, 2010 1-hour SO2 infrastructure ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ submissions. in the State and the requirement for a
SIP submission; and December 4, 2015, Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states long-term strategy (LTS) sufficient to
2012 Annual PM2.5 infrastructure SIP to address basic SIP elements such as achieve the state-adopted reasonable
submission. All other applicable the requirements for monitoring, basic progress goals.1
infrastructure requirements for these SIP program requirements, and legal EPA demonstrated that CAIR
submissions have been or will be authority that are designed to assure achieved greater reasonable progress
addressed in separate rulemakings. attainment and maintenance of the toward the national visibility goal than
newly established or revised NAAQS.
DATES: This rule is effective July 5,
More specifically, section 110(a)(1) 1 CAIR, promulgated in 2005, required 27 states
2016.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
provides the procedural and timing and the District of Columbia to reduce emissions of
NOX and SO2 that significantly contribute to, or
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a requirements for infrastructure SIPs. interfere with maintenance of, the 1997 NAAQS for
docket for this action under Docket Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements fine particulates and/or ozone in any downwind
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– that states must meet for the state. CAIR imposed specified emissions reduction
requirements on each affected State, and
2016–0072. All documents in the docket infrastructure SIP requirements related established an EPA-administered cap and trade
are listed on the http:// to a newly established or revised program for EGUs in which States could join as a
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although NAAQS. The contents of an means to meet these requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:04 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM 03JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35741/page/1.svg)
![35636 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
report containing this action and other be challenged later in proceedings to Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
required information to the U.S. Senate, enforce its requirements. See section
the U.S. House of Representatives, and 307(b)(2). Subpart II—North Carolina
the Comptroller General of the United
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 2. Section 52.1770(e), is amended by
States prior to publication of the rule in ■
the Federal Register. A major rule Environmental protection, Air adding new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) and
cannot take effect until 60 days after it pollution control, Incorporation by (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the
is published in the Federal Register. reference, Intergovernmental relations, 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1)
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). matter, Reporting and recordkeeping the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS’’,
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, requirements, Volatile organic ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure
petitions for judicial review of this compounds.
Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2
action must be filed in the United States Dated: May 23, 2016. NAAQS’’ and ‘‘110(a)(1) and (2)
Court of Appeals for the appropriate Heather McTeer Toney, Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012
circuit by August 2, 2016. Filing a Regional Administrator, Region 4. Annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’ at the end of the
petition for reconsideration by the
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: table to read as follows:
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the PART 52—APPROVAL AND § 52.1770 Identification of plan.
purposes of judicial review nor does it PROMULGATION OF * * * * *
extend the time within which a petition IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
for judicial review may be filed, and (e) * * *
shall not postpone the effectiveness of ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
such rule or action. This action may not continues to read as follows:
EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
State EPA Federal Register
Provision effective approval Explanation
citation
date date
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 11/2/2012 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of publi- Addressing prong 4 of
the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. cation in Federal section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
Register]. only.
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 8/23/2013 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of publi- Addressing prong 4 of
the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS. cation in Federal section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
Register]. only.
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 3/18/2014 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of publi- Addressing prong 4 of
the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. cation in Federal section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
Register]. only.
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 12/4/2015 6/3/2016 [Insert citation of publi- Addressing prong 4 of
the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. cation in Federal section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)
Register]. only.
[FR Doc. 2016–13036 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] the infrastructure requirements of the the structural components of each
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2008 state’s air quality management program
lead, 2008 ozone, 2010 nitrogen dioxide, are adequate to meet the state’s
and 2010 sulfur dioxide National responsibilities under the CAA.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Ambient Air Quality Standards DATES: This rule is effective on July 5,
AGENCY (NAAQS). EPA is also converting 2016.
conditional approvals for several ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
40 CFR Part 52 infrastructure requirements for the 1997 docket for this action under Docket
[EPA–R01–OAR–2015–0198; FRL–9940–14– ozone NAAQS and for the 1997 and Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
Region 1] 2006 fine particle (PM2.5) NAAQS to full 2015–0198. All documents in the docket
approval under the CAA. Furthermore, are listed on the http://
Approval and Promulgation of we are conditionally approving www.regulations.gov Web site, although
Implementation Plans; Connecticut; elements of Connecticut’s infrastructure some information, such as confidential
Infrastructure Requirements for Lead, requirements of the CAA regarding business information or other
Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur prevention of significant deterioration information whose disclosure is
Dioxide, and Fine Particulate Matter requirements to treat nitrogen oxides as restricted by statute is not publically
AGENCY: Environmental Protection a precursor to ozone and to establish a available. Certain other material, such as
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Agency (EPA). minor source baseline date for PM2.5 copyrighted material, is not placed on
ACTION: Final rule. emissions. Lastly, EPA is approving the Internet and will be publicly
three statutes submitted by Connecticut available only in hard copy form.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection in support of its demonstration that the Publicly available docket materials are
Agency (EPA) is approving elements of infrastructure requirements of the CAA available at http://www.regulations.gov
State Implementation Plan (SIP) have been met. The infrastructure or at the U.S. Environmental Protection
submissions from Connecticut regarding requirements are designed to ensure that Agency, EPA New England Regional
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:04 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM 03JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35741/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:29:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:29:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective July 5, 2016. | |
| Contact | Sean Lakeman of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr. Lakeman can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-9043 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 35634 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR