81 FR 35680 - Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2016
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 107 (June 3, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 107 (June 3, 2016)
| Page Range | 35680-35698 | |
| FR Document | 2016-13087 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 35680-35698] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-13087] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [MD Docket Nos. 16-166; FCC 16-61] Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2016 AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) will revise its Schedule of Regulatory Fees in order to recover an [[Page 35681]] amount of $384,012,497 that Congress has required the Commission to collect for fiscal year 2016. Section 9 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, provides for the annual assessment and collection of regulatory fees under sections 9(b)(2) and 9(b)(3), respectively, for annual ``Mandatory Adjustments'' and ``Permitted Amendments'' to the Schedule of Regulatory Fees. DATES: Submit comments on or before June 20, 2016, and reply comments on or before July 5, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MD Docket No. 16-166, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Federal Communications Commission's Web site: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418- 0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432. Email: [email protected]. Include MD Docket No. 16-166 in the subject line of the message. Mail: Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail, and Priority Mail, must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first- class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing Director at (202) 418-0444. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 16-61, MD Docket No. 16-166, adopted on May 18, 2016, and released on May 19, 2016. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257, Portals II, Washington, DC 20554, and may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, BCPI, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Customers may contact BCPI, Inc. via their Web site, http://www.bcpi.com, or call 1-800-378-3160. This document is available in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio record, and braille). Persons with disabilities who need documents in these formats may contact the FCC by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432. I. Procedural Matters A. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 1. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FY 2016 NPRM) shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made, and summarize all data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter's written comments, memoranda, or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. B. Comment Filing Procedures 2. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. [ssquf] All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12th St. SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. [ssquf] Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. [ssquf] U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202- 418-0432 (tty). 3. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex parte submissions will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. These documents will also be available free [[Page 35682]] online, via ECFS. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. 4. Accessibility Information. To request information in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an email to [email protected] or call the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document can also be downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (``PDF'') at: http://www.fcc.gov. C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 5. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) is contained in this document. Comments to the IRFA must be identified as responses to the IRFA and filed by the deadlines for comments on this NPRM. The Commission will send a copy of this NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. D. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act 6. This document does not contain new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). II. Introduction 7. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), we seek comment on the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's or Commission's) proposed regulatory fees for fiscal year (FY) 2016. Specifically, the Commission proposes to collect $384,012,497.00 in regulatory fees as detailed in the proposed fee schedule attached to this NPRM in Table 4. As explained in this NPRM, the proposed fee schedule includes adjustments to the table used to assess regulatory fees on broadcasters. III. Background 8. The Commission is required by Congress to assess regulatory fees each year in an amount that can reasonably be expected to equal the amount of its appropriation.\1\ Regulatory fees are mandated by Congress and are collected ``to recover the costs of . . . enforcement activities, policy and rulemaking activities, user information services, and international activities.'' \2\ Regulatory fees are to ``be derived by determining the full-time equivalent number of employees performing'' these activities, ``adjusted to take into account factors that are reasonably related to the benefits provided to the payer of the fee by the Commission's activities . . . .'' \3\ Regulatory fees recover direct costs, such as salary and expenses; indirect costs, such as overhead functions; and support costs, such as rent, utilities, or equipment.\4\ Regulatory fees also cover the costs incurred in regulating entities that are statutorily exempt from paying regulatory fees,\5\ entities whose regulatory fees are waived,\6\ and entities that provide services for which we do not assess regulatory fees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 47 U.S.C. 159(b)(1)(B). The Commission collected $7.67 million above the required regulatory fee target goal in FY 2015, which the Commission deposited into the U.S. Treasury. The cumulative over collection is $98.367 million as of September 30, 2015. \2\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a). \3\ 47 U.S.C. 159(b)(1)(A). \4\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2004, Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11662, 11666, para. 11 (2004) (FY 2004 Report and Order). \5\ For example, governmental and nonprofit entities are exempt from regulatory fees under section 9(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act or Act). 47 U.S.C. 159(h); 47 CFR 1.1162. \6\ 47 CFR 1.1166. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Congress sets the amount the Commission must collect each year in the Commission's fiscal year appropriations. Section 9(a)(2) of the Communications Act, as amended (Communications Act or Act) requires the Commission to collect fees sufficient to offset the amount appropriated.\7\ To calculate regulatory fees, the Commission allocates the total collection target across all regulatory fee categories. The allocation of fees to fee categories is based on the Commission's calculation of FTEs \8\ in each regulatory fee category. FTEs are classified as ``direct'' if the employee is in one of the four ``core'' bureaus; otherwise, that employee is considered an ``indirect'' FTE.\9\ The total FTEs for each fee category includes the direct FTEs associated with that category, plus a proportional allocation of indirect FTEs. The Commission then allocates the total amount to be collected among the various regulatory fee categories. Each regulatee within a fee category pays its proportionate share based on an objective measure, e.g., revenues, number of subscribers, or licenses.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a)(2). \8\ One FTE, a ``Full Time Equivalent'' or ``Full Time Employee,'' is a unit of measure equal to the work performed annually by a full time person (working a 40 hour workweek for a full year) assigned to the particular job, and subject to agency personnel staffing limitations established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. \9\ The core bureaus are the Wireline Competition Bureau (165 FTEs), Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (92 FTEs), Media Bureau (151 FTEs), and part of the International Bureau (24 FTEs), totaling 432 direct FTEs. The indirect FTEs are the employees from the following bureaus and offices: Enforcement Bureau, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, part of the International Bureau, Chairman and Commissioners' offices, Office of the Managing Director, Office of General Counsel, Office of the Inspector General, Office of Communications Business Opportunities, Office of Engineering and Technology, Office of Legislative Affairs, Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, Office of Workplace Diversity, Office of Media Relations, and Office of Administrative Law Judges, totaling 1,046 indirect FTEs. These totals are as of Oct. 1, 2015 and exclude auctions funded FTEs. \10\ See Procedures for Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 27 FCC Rcd 8458, 8461-62, paras. 8-11 (2012) (FY 2012 NPRM). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. The Commission continues to improve the regulatory fee process by ensuring a more equitable distribution of the regulatory fee burden among categories of Commission licensees under the statutory framework in section 9 of the Communications Act. Specifically, in the FY 2013 Report and Order, the Commission adopted updated FTE allocations to more accurately reflect the number of FTEs working on regulation and oversight of the regulatees in the various fee categories; \11\ reallocated some FTEs from the International Bureau as ``indirect;'' \12\ combined the UHF and VHF television stations into one regulatory fee category; \13\ and created a regulatory fee category that included Internet Protocol Television (IPTV).\14\ Subsequently, in the FY 2014 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission adopted a new fee subcategory (within the Interstate Telecommunications Service Provider (ITSP) category) for toll free numbers; \15\ increased the de minimis threshold for annual regulatory fee payors; \16\ and eliminated several categories from the regulatory fee schedule.\17\ In the FY 2015 NPRM and [[Page 35683]] Report and Order, the Commission added a subcategory for Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) providers (in the cable television and IPTV regulatory fee category) based on the finding that Media Bureau FTEs work on issues and proceedings that include DBS as well as other multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs).\18\ In addition, in the FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, we sought comment on revising the regulatory fee schedule for broadcasters.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2013, Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd 12351, 12354-58, paras 10-20 (2013) (FY 2013 Report and Order). This was recommended in a report issued by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2012. See GAO ``Federal Communications Commission Regulatory Fee Process Needs to be Updated,'' GAO-12-686 (August 2012) (GAO Report) at 36, (available at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-686). \12\ FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at 12355-58, paras. 13-20. \13\ Id., 28 FCC Rcd at 12361-62, paras. 29-31. \14\ Id., 28 FCC Rcd at 12362-63, paras. 32-33. \15\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2014, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 FCC Rcd 10767, 10777-79, paras. 25-28 (2014) (FY 2014 Report and Order and FNPRM). \16\ FY 2014 Report and Order and FNPRM, 29 FCC Rcd at 10774-76, paras. 18-21. \17\ Id., 29 FCC Rcd at 10776-77, paras. 22-24. \18\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2015, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Report and Order, and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 5354, 5364-5373, paras. 28-41 (2015) (FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order). We also eliminated two additional fee categories. See id., 30 FCC Rcd at 5361-62, paras. 19-22. \19\ Id., 30 FCC Rcd at 5359, para. 13. In the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, we sought further comment on the broadcast regulatory fees issue and also sought comment on ITTA's proposal to reallocate FTEs in the Wireline Competition Bureau. Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2015, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 10268, 10279- 282, paras. 27-34 (2015) (FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Discussion A. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 11. We propose to collect $384,012,497 in regulatory fees for FY 2016, pursuant to section 9 of the Communications Act.\20\ Of this amount, we project approximately $21.4 million (5.56 percent of the total FTE allocation) in fees from the International Bureau regulatees; \21\ $81.9 million (21.3 percent of the total FTE allocation) in fees from the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau regulatees; \22\ $133.97 million (34.95 percent of the total FTE allocation) from the Media Bureau regulatees; \23\ and $146.8 million (38.19 percent of the total FTE allocation) from Wireline Competition Bureau regulatees.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ 47 U.S.C. 159. The proposed regulatory fee rates for FY 2016 include $339,844,000 for operational expenses and an additional one time amount of $44,168,497 to offset facilities reduction, i.e., reduce our office space footprint and move the FCC office location if necessary. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Public Law 114- 113, Dec. 18, 2015. Due to the facilities reduction, regulatees' aggregate fees by category increased on average by approximately 11- 13 percent for 2016. \21\ Includes satellites, earth stations, submarine cable, and bearer circuits. \22\ Includes Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS), CMRS messaging, Broadband Radio Service/Local Multipoint Distribution Service (BRS/LMDS), and multi-year wireless licensees. \23\ Includes AM radio, FM radio, television, low power/FM, cable television and IPTV, DBS, and Cable Television Relay Service (CARS) licenses. \24\ Includes Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers (ITSP) and toll free numbers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. These regulatory fees are mandated by Congress and are collected ``to recover the costs of . . . enforcement activities, policy and rulemaking activities, user information services, and international activities.'' \25\ We seek comment on the proposed regulatory fee schedule in Table 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DBS Regulatory Fees as a Subcategory in the Cable Television and IPTV Category 13. This proposed fee schedule includes an updated regulatory fee for DBS, a subcategory in the cable television and IPTV category.\26\ In 2015, the Commission adopted the initial regulatory fee for DBS, as a subcategory in the cable television and IPTV category, of 12 cents per year per subscriber, or one cent per month.\27\ At that time, the Commission stated that it would update the rate for FY 2016, as necessary for ensuring an appropriate level of regulatory parity and considering the resources dedicated to this subcategory.\28\ When the Commission adopted this regulatory fee subcategory for DBS, the Commission observed that numerous regulatory developments had increased the Media Bureau FTE activity involving regulation and oversight of MVPDs, including DBS providers.\29\ For example, DBS providers (and cable television operators) are permitted to file program access complaints \30\ and complaints seeking relief under the retransmission consent good faith rules; \31\ DBS providers are subject to MVPD requirements such as those pertaining to program carriage; \32\ and they are subject to the requirement to negotiate retransmission consent in good faith.\33\ In addition, the Commission, in recent years, adopted numerous requirements that apply to all MVPDs, and thus DBS providers, as part of its implementation of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (CALM Act),\34\ the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA),\35\ as well as the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA) Reauthorization Act of 2014 (STELAR).\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ DBS also pays a regulatory per operational station in geostationary orbit. \27\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10276-77, paras. 19-20. \28\ Id., 30 FCC Rcd at 10277, para. 20. \29\ See FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5367- 68, para. 31. \30\ 47 U.S.C. 548; 47 CFR 76.1000-1004. \31\ 47 U.S.C. 325(b)(1), (3)(C)(ii); 47 CFR 76.65(b). \32\ 47 U.S.C. 536; 47 CFR 76.1300-1302. \33\ 47 U.S.C. 325(b)(3)(C)(iii); 47 CFR 76.65(a)-(b). \34\ See Implementation of the Commercial Advertisement, Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, Report and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17222 (2011) (CALM Act Report and Order). \35\ Public Law 111-260, 124 Stat. 2751 (2010). See also Amendment of Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Public Law 111-265, 124 Stat. 2795 (2010) (making corrections to the CVAA); 47 CFR part 79. \36\ The STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014 (STELAR), Public Law 113-200, 128 Stat. 2059 (2014). STELAR was enacted on December 4, 2014 (H.R. 5728, 113th Cong.). Commission work on implementation of the Act was immediate. See, e.g., Implementation of Sections 101, 103 and 105 of the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Order, 30 FCC Rcd 2380 (2015) (implementing certain STELAR provisions under the ``good cause'' exception to the Administrative Procedure Act); Amendment to the Commission's Rules Concerning Market Modification, Implementation of Section 102 of the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 10406 (2015) (adopting satellite television market modification rules to enable satellite carriers, cable operators, and commercial television stations to better serve the interests of their local communities); Implementation of Section 103 of the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 10327 (2015) (seeking comment on potential updates to the ``totality of the circumstances'' test for good faith negotiation of retransmission consent); Final Report of the DSTAC, available at https://transition.fcc.gov/dstac/dstac-report-final-08282015.pdf; ``Media Bureau Seeks Comment on DSTAC Report,'' Public Notice, DA 15-982, 2015 WL 5164960 (MB 2015); ``Media Bureau Seeks Comment for Report Required by the STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014,'' Public Notice, 30 FCC Rcd 1904 (2015) (seeking information for a report to Congress on designated market areas and considerations for fostering increased localism). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. FY 2015 was the first time the Commission assessed a regulatory fee for DBS based on Media Bureau FTEs. At that time, the Commission concluded an initial rate of 12 cents per subscriber per year was a sensible fee supported by data and analysis for FY 2015.\37\ In adopting the regulatory fee for DBS as a subcategory of cable television and IPTV category, the Commission explained that ``although DBS is not identical to cable television and IPTV, the services all receive oversight and regulation as a result of the work of Media Bureau FTEs on MVPD issues. The burden imposed on the Commission is therefore similar.'' \38\ At the same time, the Commission also explained that it would examine the appropriate allocation between and among MVPD regulatees in the coming years as the Commission implemented the new DBS fee.\39\ Such examination is [[Page 35684]] consistent with a report issued by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2012, which observed it is important for the Commission to ``regularly update analyses to ensure that fees are set based on relevant information.'' \40\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ See FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10276-77, para. 20. The agency is not required to calculate its costs with ``scientific precision.'' Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 777 F.2d 722, 736 (D.C. Cir. 1985). Reasonable approximations will suffice. Id.; Mississippi Power & Light, 601 F.2d 223, 232 (5th Cir. 1979); National Cable Television Ass'n v. FCC, 554 F.2d 1094, 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1976). \38\ FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5369, para. 33. \39\ FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5367-68, para. 34, n.129 (The Commission explained that ``[e]ven when an industry has oversight generally by one organizational unit within the Commission, we are sensitive to the fact that balance between members of the same industry may require adjustments to FTE allocations.''). \40\ GAO Report at 12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15. In addition to the activities described in our FY 2015 regulatory fee proceeding, DBS, along with other MVPDs, continues to receive oversight and regulation as a result of the work of Media Bureau FTEs. For example, the Commission recently adopted a Report and Order requiring cable operators, DBS providers, and certain other licensees to post their public file documents to the FCC-hosted online database.\41\ In addition, the Commission is currently reviewing a proposal by Chairman Wheeler to unlock the set-top box of cable and DBS operators.\42\ Thus, for reasons similar to those discussed in the FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order,\43\ and based on the Commission's analysis of the resources dedicated to this subcategory, including the resources dedicated to the pending portfolio of MVPD proceedings, the Commission proposes to revise the DBS fee rate. Specifically, in this FY 2016 regulatory fee proceeding, the Commission seeks comment on a higher regulatory fee rate of 27 cents per subscriber per year for FY 2016, as set forth in the proposed fee schedule. This fee includes a 24 cent per subscriber baseline with a proportional adjustment of three cents per subscriber associated with the Commission's facilities reduction costs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ Expansion of Online Public File Obligations to Cable and Satellite TV Operators and Broadcast and Satellite Radio Licensees, Memorandum, Opinion and Order, FCC 16-4, 2016 WL 380814 (released January 29, 2016). \42\ ``Expanding Consumer Choice in the Video Marketplace'' (January 28, 2016), available at https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/blog/2016/01/28/expanding-consumer-choice-video-marketplace. \43\ FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5367-5373, paras. 31-41. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Broadcaster Regulatory Fees 16. The Commission assesses regulatory fees on radio broadcasters based on type and class of service and on the population served. Upon occasion, the Commission makes adjustments to the methodology for assessing regulatory fees on radio broadcasters. For example, concerning population served, the Commission adopted a methodology that relied on the radio station's calculated field strength signal contour overlaid upon U.S. Census data to obtain an estimate of the population coverage for each station.\44\ Subsequently, licensees complained to the Commission that the contours exaggerated actual market areas and populations served. The Commission addressed these concerns through revising the methodology for calculating the fees.\45\ Similarly, in 2003, due to a trend toward more powerful stations and general increases in the overall population, an increasing number of stations were grouped in the one million-plus population category of the grid and the Commission expanded the AM and FM radio station grid to include wider population thresholds and extended the population category to an amount ``greater than three million.'' \46\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1997, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17161, 17179-17184, paras. 47-56 (1997). \45\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1998, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 19820, 19830-33, paras. 31- 41 (1998). \46\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2003, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 15985, 15986-87, paras. 4-5 (2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17. In the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission proposed to include a higher population row in the table for AM and FM broadcasters, i.e., to divide broadcasters that serve 3,000,001- 6,000,000 from those that have a higher population coverage.\47\ Similarly in the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission also proposed to standardize the incremental increase in fees as the population served increases \48\ and to more consistently assess fees based on the type and class of service.\49\ No comments were received by the Commission concerning this proposal. The Commission now tentatively concludes adopting these proposals will make the regulatory fees for AM and FM radio more rational and address, in part, the problem of a large number of stations in the highest grid.\50\ The Commission seeks comment on the following proposed table of regulatory fees for AM and FM radio broadcasters, which includes fees based on the adoption of both options. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10280, para. 28. \48\ Id. Specifically, we sought comment on standardizing the incremental increase in fees as radio broadcasters increase the population they serve, such as by requiring that fee adjustments between tiers monotonically increase as the population served increases. Id. \49\ Id. We sought comment on assessing fees based on the relative type and class of service, such as by assessing FM class B, C, C0, C1, & C2 stations at twice the rate of AM class C stations, and FM class A, B1, & C3 stations assessed at 75 percent more than AM class C stations. For AM stations, we sought comment on assessing AM class A stations at 60 percent more, AM class B stations at 15 percent more, and AM class D stations at 10 percent more than AM class C stations. Id. \50\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10279- 280, paras. 27-28. Table 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2016 Radio station regulatory fees (proposed) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FM Classes B, Population served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D FM Classes A, C, C0, C1 & B1 & C3 C2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <=25,000................................................ $1,100 $795 $690 $760 $1,200 $1,375 25,001-75,000........................................... 1,650 1,200 1,025 1,150 1,800 2,050 75,001-150,000.......................................... 2,200 1,600 1,375 1,525 2,400 2,750 150,001-500,000......................................... 3,300 2,375 2,075 2,275 3,600 4,125 500,001-1,200,000....................................... 5,500 3,975 3,450 3,800 6,000 6,875 1,200,001-3,000,00...................................... 8,250 5,950 5,175 5,700 9,000 10,300 3,000,001-6,000,00...................................... 11,000 7,950 6,900 7,600 12,000 13,750 >6,000,000.............................................. 13,750 9,950 8,625 9,500 15,000 17,175 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18. Concerning television broadcasters, in the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission proposed to readjust the table to restore the traditional determination that Top 10 stations should pay about twice what [[Page 35685]] stations in markets 26-50 pay.\51\ The Commission did not receive comments on this proposal. At this time, the Commission tentatively concludes that this proposal will make the regulatory fees for television broadcasters more rational. Accordingly, the Commission seeks comment on the regulatory fees for television broadcasters as set forth in Table 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \51\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10280-81, para. 29. Table 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 2016 Television station regulatory fees (proposed) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2016 Digital TV (47 CFR part 73) VHF and UHF FY 2015 Proposed commercial Fee rates fee rates ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Markets 1-10.................................... $46,825 $60,775 Markets 11-25................................... 43,200 45,750 Markets 26-50................................... 27,625 30,575 Markets 51-100.................................. 16,275 15,225 Remaining Markets............................... 4,850 5,000 Construction Permits............................ 4,850 5,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19. The Commission also recognizes that the incentive auction scheduled for 2016 is a substantial event for the television broadcast industry. As a result, in the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission sought comment on whether, when, and how the Commission should adjust its methodology for assessing regulatory fees on television stations to respond to such potential changed circumstances consistent with the provisions of section 9 of the Communications Act.\52\ While the Commission received comments on the issue,\53\ it is too early to revise our regulatory fee apportionment because of the uncertainty in events that have yet to happen. The Commission intends to consider any changed circumstances due to the incentive auction as part of the FY 2017 regulatory fee proceeding. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \52\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10281, para. 30. \53\ NAB Comments at 2-7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. International Services: Terrestrial and Satellite Services 20. Facilities-based common carriers must pay regulatory fees for terrestrial and satellite International Bearer Circuits (IBCs) active (used or leased) as of December 31 of the prior year in any terrestrial or satellite transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier.\54\ In the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission asked facilities-based common carriers to review their reporting processes to ensure that they accurately calculate and report IBCs.\55\ The Commission reminded facilities-based common carriers that they must include all common carrier circuits used by themselves or their affiliates when calculating the number of active circuits. The Commission also indicated that we will review the processes for reporting IBCs in the near future to ensure that all carriers are reporting IBCs in the same manner, consistent with our rules. In this regard, the Commission seeks comment on how we can ensure that all providers are calculating and reporting IBCs in the same manner. What criteria do providers use to distinguish common carrier terrestrial circuits from non-common carrier terrestrial circuits for regulatory fee purposes? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \54\ See para. 22 infra. \55\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd 10268, 10283-85, para. 40 and n.128. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21. As the Commission has stated in the past, non-common carrier terrestrial circuits play an important role in the provision of international services through microwave and fiber links across the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico borders, and the Commission regularly engages with counterparts in Canada and Mexico on a wide range of issues related to cross-border communications.\56\ In 2009, the Commission explored whether carriers should be assessed regulatory fees for their terrestrial non-common carrier circuits, but declined to do so at that time because of the ``complexity of the legal, policy and equity issues involved.'' \57\ Since that time, the telecommunications industry and Commission's rules have evolved, and the Commission now seeks comment on whether it would be more equitable to no longer distinguish common carrier terrestrial circuits from non-common carrier terrestrial circuits for regulatory fee purposes. If the Commission requires carriers providing international service over terrestrial circuits to pay IBC regulatory fees for their non-common carrier circuits, what is the least burdensome methodology for calculating fees? For example, should the Commission require carriers to report the total amount of international revenue rather than the number of circuits? How do carriers identify their international revenues? How can the Commission ensure carriers are accurately reporting both common carrier and non-common carrier terrestrial circuits? Finally, how can the Commission improve the requirements and regulatory treatment of terrestrial and satellite services for purposes of regulatory fees? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 5966, 5971, para. 14 (2009). \57\ Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2009, Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 10301, 10306-307, paras. 16- 17 (2009). On March 17, 2009, the Commission adopted in the Submarine Cable Order a new submarine cable bearer circuit methodology that allocates IBC costs among service providers in an equitable and competitively neutral manner, without distinguishing between common carriers and non-common carriers, by assessing a flat per cable landing license fee for all submarine cable systems. Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4208, 4214-16, paras. 13-17 (2009) (Submarine Cable Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Other Regulatory Fee Reform a. ITTA Proposal 22. In the FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the Commission sought comment on ITTA's proposals to combine wireless voice and wireline services into the ITSP category \58\ or, alternatively, to re- assign certain Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs to other fee categories, for regulatory fee purposes. The Commission also sought comment on adopting a new regulatory fee category for CMRS, as a subcategory of the ITSP regulatory fee category.\59\ The Commission has had an opportunity to further review ITTA's proposals and, as we explain below, we tentatively conclude that combining the wireline and wireless categories, reassigning Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, and/or adopting a new subcategory for CMRS in the ITSP regulatory fee category are not consistent with Commission orders implementing section 9 of the Communications Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \58\ ITTA Comments at 4-9. See FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10281-82, paras. 31-34. ITTA had proposed this previously. See, e.g., Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2014, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 FCC Rcd 6417, 6430-31, paras. 36-39 (2014) (FY 2014 NPRM); Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2013, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 28 FCC Rcd 7790, 7796, para. 12 (2013) (FY 2013 NPRM); Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 6388, 6404-05, paras. 40-41 (2008) (FY 2008 FNPRM). \59\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10282, para. 34. ITTA and ACA argue that such change is supported by the fact that many proceedings in the Wireline Competition Bureau proceedings, and elsewhere, such as those involving universal service, intercarrier compensation, pole attachments, rural call completion, number portability, 911 access, and special access, affect wireless service providers. ITTA Comments at 9-10; ACA Comments at 4-7. CTIA opposes this proposal as arbitrary and capricious as well as in violation of section 9 of the Act. CTIA Comments at 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23. The Commission has stated that ``[g]iven the significant implications of reassignment of FTEs in our fee [[Page 35686]] calculation, we make changes to FTE classifications only after performing considerable analysis and finding the clearest case for reassignment.'' \60\ In this instance, ITTA contends that the Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs working on universal service issues and other proceedings benefit categories of service providers other than ITSPs, particularly CMRS providers, and therefore should be considered in calculating the CMRS regulatory fee.\61\ Based on our own detailed analysis, as well as the fact that the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau assigns its own FTEs to coordinate with the Wireline Competition Bureau on relevant wireless issues, we tentatively conclude that a clear case for reassignment of Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau is not demonstrated in this instance. Our analysis of the Wireline Competition Bureau FTE work on wireline issues that also affect the CMRS industry does not support adopting a new subcategory for CMRS in the ITSP regulatory fee category--and thus assessing regulatory fees on CMRS based on both Wireless Telecommunications Bureau FTEs and Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs, as ITTA proposes.\62\ Further, ITTA's proposal to combine these regulatory fee categories does not appear to address the substantial differences between the services in terms of regulatory oversight by the two bureaus. Thus, at this juncture, the Commission does not find that the ``clearest case of reassignment'' exists based on the considerable analysis we have conducted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \60\ FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at 12357, para. 19. The Commission observed that the International Bureau was a ``singular case'' because the work of those FTEs ``primarily benefits licensees regulated by other bureaus.'' Id., 28 FCC Rcd at 12355, para. 14. \61\ ITTA Comments at 10. \62\ See Letter from Micah M. Caldwell, ITTA, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (January 22, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24. The Commission nevertheless seeks comment on whether it would be appropriate to allocate some proportion of the direct FTEs that devote time to universal service and/or numbering issues as additional indirect FTEs.\63\ Based on staff estimates looking back over a 6 to 12 month period, of the 165 FTEs in the Wireline Competition Bureau, approximately seven FTEs work on numbering issues and 52 FTEs work on universal service issues (approximately 16 on the high-cost program, 13 on the schools and libraries program, nine on the Lifeline program for low income consumers (lifeline), seven on the rural healthcare program, and seven on universal service contributions).\64\ Of the 92 FTEs in the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, staff estimate that the equivalent of approximately five FTEs work roughly full time on universal service issues (primarily the high-cost program). If we were to reallocate, for regulatory fee purposes, some proportion of the direct FTEs, what should that proportion be? Any proposals should demonstrate policy or legal arguments supporting reallocating some proportion of numbering and/or USF FTEs as indirect. In doing so, the Commission would invite comment on whether some or all of the FTEs that work on universal service contributions, the schools and libraries program, or the rural healthcare program, should be reallocated as indirect FTEs. Should the Commission reallocate some proportion of the FTEs from each bureau that work on the high-cost program, given the participation of non-wireline and wireless regulatees in the Connect America Fund proceedings? What proportion, if any, of the FTEs that work on numbering issues and the lifeline program should the Commission reallocate given that a significant number of regulatees benefiting from those programs are not wireline regulatees? Is there some proportion of these FTEs whose ``activities benefit the Commission as a whole and are not specifically focused on [core bureau] regulatees''? \65\ Commenters' proposals for FTE reallocation should be consistent with the section 9 requirement that regulatory fees are to ``be derived by determining the full-time equivalent number of employees performing'' Commission activities, ``adjusted to take into account factors that are reasonably related to the benefits provided to the payer of the fee by the Commission's activities . . . .'' \66\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \63\ Currently, indirect FTEs in various bureaus and offices work on universal service issues. \64\ These estimates can vary as discussed above and do not represent an entire fiscal year. \65\ FY 2013 NPRM, 28 FCC Rcd at 7803, para. 28. \66\ 47 U.S.C. 159(b)(1)(A). (Emphasis added). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25. The Commission notes that incorrect allocation of FTEs to a particular core bureau may disproportionately impact regulatees given that indirect FTEs are allocated proportionally based on the direct FTE percentage attributable to a particular core bureau. The Commission also notes that any change in the allocation of FTEs necessarily affects the fees paid by payors in all other fee categories. We seek comment on whether this proposal is consistent with section 9 of the Act \67\ and with the Commission's allocation policies with respect to direct and indirect FTEs.\68\ Commenters should also address the Commission's goal of ensuring that regulatory fees are administrable and sustainable.\69\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \67\ Section 9 of the Communications Act requires regulatory fees collected ``to recover the costs of . . . enforcement activities, policy and rulemaking activities, user information services, and international activities.'' 47 U.S.C. 159(a). The regulatory fees are to ``be derived by determining the full-time equivalent number of employees performing'' these activities, ``adjusted to take into account factors that are reasonably related to the benefits provided to the payer of the fee by the Commission's activities . . . .'' 47 U.S.C. 159(b)(1)(A). \68\ FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at 12354-55, paras. 10-12 (adopting use of current FTE data for purposes of regulatory fee calculations as opposed to 1998 FTE data previously used); id. at 12357-58, paras. 19-20 (``It would be inconsistent with section 9 to delay reallocating the International Bureau FTEs, where the reallocation is clearly warranted, while we engage in painstaking examinations of less clear and more factually complex situations in other bureaus. . . . At the same time, however, we recognize that a reexamination of how FTEs are allocated throughout the Commission is an indispensable part of comprehensively revising the Commission's regulatory fee program.''); FY 2013 NPRM, 28 FCC Rcd at 7793-95, 7796-99, 7803, paras. 7-10, 15-19, 29 (generally explaining prior FTE allocation methodology and proposing methodology changes). \69\ FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at 12354, para 9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- b. Earth Stations 26. In the FY 2014 NPRM, the Commission sought comment on increasing the earth station regulatory fee allocation in order to reflect more appropriately the number of FTEs devoted to the regulation and oversight of the earth station portion of the satellite industry.\70\ In the FY 2014 regulatory fee proceeding, the Commission increased the regulatory fees paid by earth station licensees by approximately 7.5 percent based on our analysis and review of the record.\71\ In the FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, the Commission sought comment on whether to raise the earth station regulatory fees again.\72\ We concluded, however, that the issue required further analysis, in part because the then-pending part 25 proceeding streamlining the satellite licensing rules might affect the distribution of FTE work.\73\ An Order was adopted in that proceeding in December 2015, and accordingly it is timely to again seek comment on whether to increase the regulatory fees paid by earth station licensees.\74\ In this context, we seek comment on EchoStar's proposal to [[Page 35687]] adopt different regulatory fees for different types of earth station licenses.\75\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \70\ FY 2014 NPRM, 29 FCC Rcd at 6428, para. 29. \71\ See FY 2014 Report and Order, 29 FCC Rcd at 10772-73, para. 12. \72\ FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5360, para. 14. \73\ FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd at 5360, para. 14. \74\ See Comprehensive Review of Licensing and Operating Rules for Satellite Services, Second Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 14713 (2015). \75\ See EchoStar July 20, 2015 ex parte, filed in MD Docket No. 15-121. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Procedural Matters A. Payment of Regulatory Fees 1. Payments by Check Will Not Be Accepted for Payment of Annual Regulatory Fees 27. Pursuant to an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directive,\76\ the Commission is moving towards a paperless environment, extending to disbursement and collection of select federal government payments and receipts.\77\ Last year the Commission stopped accepting checks (including cashier's checks and money orders) and the accompanying hardcopy forms (e.g., Forms 159, 159-B, 159-E, 159-W) for the payment of regulatory fees.\78\ This new paperless procedure requires that all payments be made by online Automated Clearing House (ACH) payment, online credit card, or wire transfer. Any other form of payment (e.g., checks, cashier's checks, or money orders) will be rejected. For payments by wire, a Form 159-E should still be transmitted via fax so that the Commission can associate the wire payment with the correct regulatory fee information. This change affects all payments of regulatory fees.\79\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \76\ Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-10-06, Open Government Directive, December 8, 2009; see also http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/06/13/executive-order-13576-delivering-efficient-effective-and-accountable-gov. \77\ See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Open Government Plan 2.1, September 2012. \78\ FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10282-83, para. 35. See 47 CFR 1.1158. \79\ Payors should note that this change will mean that to the extent certain entities have to date paid both regulatory fees and application fees at the same time via paper check, they will no longer be able to do so as the regulatory fees payment via paper check will no longer be accepted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Revised Credit Card Transaction Levels 28. Since June 1, 2015, in accordance with U.S. Treasury Announcement No. A-2014-04 (July 2014), the amount that can be charged on a credit card for transactions with federal agencies has been reduced to $24,999.99.\80\ Transactions greater than $24,999.99 will be rejected. This limit applies to single payments or bundled payments of more than one bill. Multiple transactions to a single agency in one day may be aggregated and treated as a single transaction subject to the $24,999.99 limit. Customers who wish to pay an amount greater than $24,999.99 should consider available electronic alternatives such as Visa or MasterCard debit cards, ACH debits from a bank account, and wire transfers. Each of these payment options is available after filing regulatory fee information in Fee Filer. Further details will be provided regarding payment methods and procedures at the time of FY 2016 regulatory fee collection in Fact Sheets, available at https://www.fcc.gov/regfees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \80\ Customers who owe an amount on a bill, debt, or other obligation due to the federal government are prohibited from splitting the total amount due into multiple payments. Splitting an amount owed into several payment transactions violates the credit card network and Fiscal Service rules. An amount owed that exceeds the Fiscal Service maximum dollar amount, $24,999.99, may not be split into two or more payment transactions in the same day by using one or multiple cards. Also, an amount owed that exceeds the Fiscal Service maximum dollar amount may not be split into two or more transactions over multiple days by using one or more cards. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. De Minimis Regulatory Fees 29. Regulatees whose total FY 2016 annual regulatory fee liability, including all categories of fees for which payment is due, is $500 or less are exempt from payment of FY 2016 regulatory fees. The de minimis threshold applies only to filers of annual regulatory fees (not regulatory fees paid through multi-year filings), and it is not a permanent exemption. Each regulatee will need to reevaluate their total fee liability each fiscal year to determine whether they meet the de minimis exemption. 4. Standard Fee Calculations and Payment Dates 30. The Commission will accept fee payments made in advance of the window for the payment of regulatory fees. The responsibility for payment of fees by service category is as follows: Media Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for initial construction permits that were granted on or before October 1, 2015 for AM/FM radio stations, VHF/UHF full service television stations, and satellite television stations. Regulatory fees must be paid for all broadcast facility licenses granted on or before October 1, 2015. For providers of Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service, regulatory fees should be paid based on a subscriber count on or about December 31, 2015. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. Wireline (Common Carrier) Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1, 2015. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. Audio bridging service providers are included in this category.\81\ For Responsible Organizations (RespOrgs) that manage Toll Free Numbers (TFN), regulatory fees should be paid on all working, assigned, and reserved toll free numbers as well as toll free numbers in any other status as defined in section 52.103 of the Commission's rules.\82\ The unit count should be based on toll free numbers managed by RespOrgs on or about December 31, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \81\ Audio bridging services are toll teleconferencing services. \82\ 47 CFR 52.103. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wireless Services: CMRS cellular, mobile, and messaging services (fees based on number of subscribers or telephone number count): Regulatory fees must be paid for authorizations that were granted on or before October 1, 2015. The number of subscribers, units, or telephone numbers on December 31, 2015 will be used as the basis from which to calculate the fee payment. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. Wireless Services, Multi-year fees: The first eight regulatory fee categories in our Schedule of Regulatory Fees pay ``small multi-year wireless regulatory fees.'' Entities pay these regulatory fees in advance for the entire amount period covered by the five-year or ten-year terms of their initial licenses, and pay regulatory fees again only when the license is renewed or a new license is obtained. We include these fee categories in our rulemaking (see Table 3) to publicize our estimates of the number of ``small multi-year wireless'' licenses that will be renewed or newly obtained in FY 2016. Multichannel Video Programming Distributor Services (cable television operators and CARS licensees): Regulatory fees must be paid for the number of basic cable television subscribers as of December 31, 2015.\83\ [[Page 35688]] Regulatory fees also must be paid for CARS licenses that were granted on or before October 1, 2015. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \83\ Cable television system operators should compute their number of basic subscribers as follows: Number of single family dwellings + number of individual households in multiple dwelling unit (apartments, condominiums, mobile home parks, etc.) paying at the basic subscriber rate + bulk rate customers + courtesy and free service. Note: Bulk-Rate Customers = Total annual bulk-rate charge divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Operators may base their count on ``a typical day in the last full week'' of December 2015, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- International Services: Regulatory fees must be paid for (1) earth stations and (2) geostationary orbit space stations and non- geostationary orbit satellite systems that were licensed and operational on or before October 1, 2015. In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. International Services: (Submarine Cable Systems): Regulatory fees for submarine cable systems are to be paid on a per cable landing license basis based on circuit capacity as of December 31, 2015. In instances where a license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the license as of the fee due date. For regulatory fee purposes, the allocation in FY 2016 will remain at 87.6 percent for submarine cable and 12.4 percent for satellite/terrestrial facilities. International Services: (Terrestrial and Satellite Services): Regulatory fees for Terrestrial and Satellite International Bearer Circuits (IBCs) are to be paid by facilities-based common carriers that have active (used or leased) international bearer circuits as of December 31, 2015 in any terrestrial or satellite transmission facility for the provision of service to an end user or resale carrier. When calculating the number of such active circuits, the facilities-based common carriers must include circuits used by themselves or their affiliates. In addition, non-common carrier satellite operators must pay a fee for each circuit they and their affiliates hold and each circuit sold or leased to any customer, other than an international common carrier authorized by the Commission to provide U.S. international common carrier services. For these purposes, ``active circuits'' include backup and redundant circuits as of December 31, 2015. Whether circuits are used specifically for voice or data is not relevant for purposes of determining that they are active circuits.\84\ In instances where a permit or license is transferred or assigned after October 1, 2015, responsibility for payment rests with the holder of the permit or license as of the fee due date. For regulatory fee purposes, the allocation in FY 2016 will remain at 87.6 percent for submarine cable and 12.4 percent for satellite/terrestrial facilities.\85\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \84\ We encourage terrestrial and satellite service providers to seek guidance from the International Bureau's Telecommunications and Analysis Division to verify their particular IBC reporting processes to ensure that their calculation methods comply with our rules. \85\ We remind facilities-based common carriers to review their reporting processes to ensure that they accurately calculate and report IBCs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) Cellular and Mobile Services Assessments 31. The Commission will compile data from the Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast (NRUF) report that is based on ``assigned'' telephone number (subscriber) counts that have been adjusted for porting to net Type 0 ports (``in'' and ``out'').\86\ This information of telephone numbers (subscriber count) will be posted on the Commission's electronic filing and payment system (Fee Filer) along with the carrier's Operating Company Numbers (OCNs). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \86\ See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2005, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 12259, 12264, paras. 38-44 (2005). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. A carrier wishing to revise its telephone number (subscriber) count can do so by accessing Fee Filer and follow the prompts to revise their telephone number counts. Any revisions to the telephone number counts should be accompanied by an explanation or supporting documentation.\87\ The Commission will then review the revised count and supporting documentation and either approve or disapprove the submission in Fee Filer. If the submission is disapproved, the Commission will contact the provider to afford the provider an opportunity to discuss its revised subscriber count and/or provide additional supporting documentation. If we receive no response from the provider, or we do not reverse our initial disapproval of the provider's revised count submission, the fee payment must be based on the number of subscribers listed initially in Fee Filer. Once the timeframe for revision has passed, the telephone number counts are final and are the basis upon which CMRS regulatory fees are to be paid. Providers can view their final telephone counts online in Fee Filer. A final CMRS assessment letter will not be mailed out. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \87\ In the supporting documentation, the provider will need to state a reason for the change, such as a purchase or sale of a subsidiary, the date of the transaction, and any other pertinent information that will help to justify a reason for the change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 33. Because some carriers do not file the NRUF report, they may not see their telephone number counts in Fee Filer. In these instances, the carriers should compute their fee payment using the standard methodology that is currently in place for CMRS Wireless services (i.e., compute their telephone number counts as of December 31, 2015), and submit their fee payment accordingly. Whether a carrier reviews its telephone number counts in Fee Filer or not, the Commission reserves the right to audit the number of telephone numbers for which regulatory fees are paid. In the event that the Commission determines that the number of telephone numbers that are paid is inaccurate, the Commission will bill the carrier for the difference between what was paid and what should have been paid. VI. Additional Tables Table 3--Calculation of FY 2016 Revenue Requirements and Pro-Rata Fees [Regulatory fees for the first seven categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are submitted at the time the application is filed] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2015 Prorated FY Fee category FY 2016 payment Years revenue 2016 revenue Computed FY Rounded FY Expected FY units estimate requirement 2016 reg. fee 2016 reg. fee 2016 revenue -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLMRS (Exclusive Use)...................... 2,500 10 546,000 625,938 25 25 625,000 PLMRS (Shared use) Includes Rural Radio 31,100 10 3,100,000 3,114,665 10 10 3,110,000 Service (47 CFR part 22).................. Microwave.................................. 12,500 10 2,520,000 3,129,688 25 25 3,125,000 [[Page 35689]] Marine (Ship).............................. 6,900 10 945,000 1,036,553 15 15 1,035,000 Aviation (Aircraft)........................ 4,700 10 420,000 470,705 10 10 470,000 Marine (Coast)............................. 480 10 171,500 192,288 40 40 192,000 Aviation (Ground).......................... 1,100 10 180,000 220,330 20 20 220,000 AM Class A\4\.............................. 66 1 281,125 314,451 4,764 4,775 315,150 AM Class B\4\.............................. 1,535 1 3,499,125 3,893,459 2,536 2,525 3,875,875 AM Class C\4\.............................. 889 1 1,244,600 1,409,299 1,585 1,575 1,400,175 AM Class D\4\.............................. 1,492 1 4,103,000 4,607,579 3,088 3,100 4,625,200 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 \4\.................. 3,122 1 8,613,000 9,652,908 3,092 3,100 9,678,200 FM Classes B, C, C0, C1 & C2 \4\........... 3,139 1 10,607,625 11,826,839 3,768 3,775 11,849,725 AM Construction Permits \1\................ 15 1 17,110 10,366 691 690 10,350 FM Construction Permits\1\................. 179 1 136,500 215,122 1,202 1,200 214,800 Satellite TV............................... 128 1 200,025 224,336 1,753 1,750 224,000 Digital TV Markets 1-10.................... 139 1 6,274,550 8,446,540 60,766 60,775 8,447,725 Digital TV Markets 11-25................... 139 1 5,918,400 6,358,412 45,744 45,750 6,359,250 Digital TV Markets 26-50................... 181 1 5,000,125 5,532,175 30,565 30,575 5534,075 Digital TV Markets 51-100.................. 283 1 4,605,825 4,311,203 15,234 15,225 4,308,675 Digital TV Remaining Markets............... 365 1 1,838,150 1,827,738 5,008 5,000 1,825,000 Digital TV Construction Permits\1\......... 3 1 9,700 15,023 5,000 5,000 15,000 LPTV/Translators/Boosters/Class A TV....... 3,924 1 1,601,600 1,788,098 456 455 1,785,420 CARS Stations.............................. 285 1 198,000 221,206 776 775 220,875 Cable TV Systems, including IPTV........... 64,100,000 1 61,920,000 64,196,150 1.0015 1.00 64,100,000 Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS)........... 34,000,000 1 4,080,000 9,193,770 .2704 .27 9,180,000 Interstate Telecommunication Service $38,400,000,000 1 128,428,000 141,908,544 0.0036955 0.00370 142,080,000 Providers................................. Toll Free Numbers.......................... 36,500,000 1 4,380,000 4,752,018 0.1302 0.13 4,745,000 CMRS Mobile Services (Cellular/Public 360,000,000 1 60,180,000 72,108,276 0.2003 0.20 72,000,000 Mobile)................................... CMRS Messag. Services...................... 2,300,000 1 208,000 184,000 0.0800 0.080 184,000 BRS \2\.................................... 890 1 565,150 645,250 725 725 645,250 LMDS....................................... 395 1 238,125 286,375 725 725 286,375 Per 64 kbps Int'l Bearer Circuits 22,500,000 1 657,000 770,617 .0342 .03 675,000 Terrestrial (Common) & Satellite (Common & Non-Common)............................... Submarine Cable Providers (see chart in 39.19 1 4,652,576 5,444,038 138,914 138,925 5,444,471 Appendix B) \3\........................... Earth Stations............................. 3,400 1 1,023,000 1,174,760 346 345 1,173,000 Space Stations (Geostationary)............. 95 1 11,438,400 13,174,858 138,683 138,675 13,174,125 Space Stations (Non-Geostationary)......... 6 1 792,750 913,068 152,178 152,175 913,050 ****** Total Estimated Revenue to be .................. ....... 340,593,961 384,196,740 .............. .............. 384,066,766 Collected............................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ****** Total Revenue Requirement....... .................. ....... 339,844,000 384,012,497 .............. .............. 384,012,497 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Difference......................... .................. ....... 749,961 184,243 .............. .............. 54,269 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes on Table 3. \1\ The AM and FM Construction Permit revenues and the Digital (VHF/UHF) Construction Permit revenues were adjusted, respectively, to set the regulatory fee to an amount no higher than the lowest licensed fee for that class of service. Reductions in the Digital (VHF/UHF) Construction Permit revenues were also offset by increases in the revenue totals for various Digital television stations by market size, respectively. \2\ MDS/MMDS category was renamed Broadband Radio Service (BRS). See Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150-2162 and 2500-2690 MHz Bands, Report & Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 14165, 14169, para. 6 (2004). [[Page 35690]] \3\ The chart at the end of Table 4 lists the submarine cable bearer circuit regulatory fees (common and non-common carrier basis) that resulted from the adoption of Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 6388 (2008) and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 4208 (2009). \4\ The fee amounts listed in the column entitled ``Rounded New FY 2016 Regulatory Fee'' constitute a weighted average media regulatory fee by class of service. The actual FY 2016 regulatory fees for AM/FM radio station are listed on a grid located at the end of Table 4. Table 4--Proposed Regulatory Fees FY 2016 Schedule of Regulatory Fees [Regulatory fees for the first eight categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are submitted at the time the application is filed] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Annual regulatory Fee category fee (U.S. $'s) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PLMRS (per license) (Exclusive Use) (47 CFR part 90). 25 Microwave (per license) (47 CFR part 101)............ 25 Marine (Ship) (per station) (47 CFR part 80)......... 15 Marine (Coast) (per license) (47 CFR part 80)........ 40 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under 10 the Land Mobile category)........................... PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90).... 10 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87)... 10 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87)..... 20 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR .20 parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90).................... CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, .08 22, 24 and 90)...................................... Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/MDS) (per 725 license) (47 CFR part 27) Local Multipoint 725 Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101)................................................ AM Radio Construction Permits........................ 690 FM Radio Construction Permits........................ 1,200 Digital TV (47 CFR part 73) VHF and UHF Commercial Markets 1-10..................................... 60,775 Markets 11-25.................................... 45,750 Markets 26-50.................................... 30,575 Markets 51-100................................... 15,225 Remaining Markets................................ 5,000 Construction Permits............................. 5,000 Satellite Television Stations (All Markets).......... 1,750 Low Power TV, Class A TV, TV/FM Translators & 455 Boosters (47 CFR part 74)........................... CARS (47 CFR part 78)................................ 775 Cable Television Systems (per subscriber) (47 CFR 1.00 part 76), Including IPTV............................ Direct Broadcast Service (DBS) (per subscriber) (as .27 defined by section 602(13) of the Act).............. Interstate Telecommunication Service Providers (per .00370 revenue dollar)..................................... Toll Free (per toll free subscriber) (47 CFR section .13 52.101 (f) of the rules)............................ Earth Stations (47 CFR part 25)...................... 345 Space Stations (per operational station in 138,675 geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) also includes DBS Service (per operational station) (47 CFR part 100)................................................ Space Stations (per operational system in non- 152,175 geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25)............... International Bearer Circuits--Terrestrial/Satellites .03 (per 64KB circuit).................................. Submarine Cable Landing Licenses Fee (per cable See Table Below system)............................................. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 2016 Schedule of Regulatory Fees [Table 4 continued] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2016 RADIO STATION REGULATORY FEES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FM Classes A, FM Classes B, Population Served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D B1 & C3 C, C0, C1 & C2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <=25,000................................................ $1,100 $795 $690 $760 $1,200 $1,375 25,001-75,000........................................... 1,650 1,200 1,025 1,150 1,800 2,050 75,001-150,000.......................................... 2,200 1,600 1,375 1,525 2,400 2,750 150,001-500,000......................................... 3,300 2,375 2,075 2,275 3,600 4,125 500,001-1,200,000....................................... 5,500 3,975 3,450 3,800 6,000 6,875 1,200,001-3,000,00...................................... 8,250 5,950 5,175 5,700 9,000 10,300 3,000,001-6,000,00...................................... 11,000 7,950 6,900 7,600 12,000 13,750 >6,000,000.............................................. 13,750 9,950 8,625 9,500 15,000 17,175 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 35691]] FY 2016 SCHEDULE OF REGULATORY FEES [International Bearer Circuits--Submarine Cable (Table 4 continued)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Submarine Cable Systems (capacity as of December 31, 2015) Fee amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------ < 2.5 Gbps.............................................. $8,675 2.5 Gbps or greater, but less than 5 Gbps............... 17,375 5 Gbps or greater, but less than 10 Gbps................ 34,725 10 Gbps or greater, but less than 20 Gbps............... 69,475 20 Gbps or greater...................................... 138,925 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 5--Sources of Payment Unit Estimates for FY 2016 In order to calculate individual service fees for FY 2016, we adjusted FY 2015 payment units for each service to more accurately reflect expected FY 2016 payment liabilities. We obtained our updated estimates through a variety of means. For example, we used Commission licensee data bases, actual prior year payment records and industry and trade association projections when available. The databases we consulted include our Universal Licensing System (ULS), International Bureau Filing System (IBFS), Consolidated Database System (CDBS) and Cable Operations and Licensing System (COALS), as well as reports generated within the Commission such as the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Numbering Resource Utilization Forecast. We sought verification for these estimates from multiple sources and, in all cases, we compared FY 2016 estimates with actual FY 2015 payment units to ensure that our revised estimates were reasonable. Where appropriate, we adjusted and/or rounded our final estimates to take into consideration the fact that certain variables that impact on the number of payment units cannot yet be estimated with sufficient accuracy. These include an unknown number of waivers and/or exemptions that may occur in FY 2016 and the fact that, in many services, the number of actual licensees or station operators fluctuates from time to time due to economic, technical, or other reasons. When we note, for example, that our estimated FY 2016 payment units are based on FY 2015 actual payment units, it does not necessarily mean that our FY 2016 projection is exactly the same number as in FY 2015. We have either rounded the FY 2016 number or adjusted it slightly to account for these variables. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fee category Sources of payment unit estimates ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Land Mobile (All), Microwave, Based on Wireless Telecommunications Marine (Ship & Coast), Aviation Bureau (WTB) projections of new (Aircraft & Ground), Domestic applications and renewals taking Public Fixed. into consideration existing Commission licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft) and Marine (Ship) estimates have been adjusted to take into consideration the licensing of portions of these services on a voluntary basis. CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services..... Based on WTB projection reports, and FY 2015 payment data. CMRS Messaging Services........... Based on WTB reports, and FY 2015 payment data. AM/FM Radio Stations.............. Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units. Digital TV Stations (Combined VHF/ Based on CDBS data, adjusted for UHF units). exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units. AM/FM/TV Construction Permits..... Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units. LPTV, Translators and Boosters, Based on CDBS data, adjusted for Class A Television. exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units. BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS)........... Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2015 payment units. LMDS.............................. Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2015 payment units. Cable Television Relay Service Based on data from Media Bureau's (CARS) Stations. COALS database and actual FY 2015 payment units. Cable Television System Based on publicly available data Subscribers, Including IPTV sources for estimated subscriber Subscribers. counts and actual FY 2015 payment units. Interstate Telecommunication Based on FCC Form 499-Q data for the Service Providers. four quarters of calendar year 2015, the Wireline Competition Bureau projected the amount of calendar year 2015 revenue that will be reported on 2016 FCC Form 499-A worksheets in April 2016. Earth Stations.................... Based on International Bureau (IB) licensing data and actual FY 2015 payment units. Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs)..... Based on IB data reports and actual FY 2015 payment units. International Bearer Circuits..... Based on IB reports and submissions by licensees, adjusted as necessary. Submarine Cable Licenses.......... Based on IB license information. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 6--Factors, Measurements, and Calculations That Determines Station Signal Contours and Associated Population Coverages AM Stations For stations with nondirectional daytime antennas, the theoretical radiation was used at all azimuths. For stations with directional daytime antennas, specific information on each day tower, including field ratio, phase, spacing, and orientation was retrieved, as well as the theoretical pattern root-mean-square of the radiation in all directions in the horizontal plane (RMS) figure (milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @1 km) for the antenna system. The standard, or augmented standard if pertinent, horizontal plane radiation pattern was calculated using techniques and methods specified in sections 73.150 and 73.152 of the Commission's rules. Radiation values were calculated for each of 360 radials around the transmitter site. Next, estimated soil conductivity data was retrieved from a database representing the information in FCC Figure R3. Using the calculated horizontal radiation values, and the [[Page 35692]] retrieved soil conductivity data, the distance to the principal community (5 mV/m) contour was predicted for each of the 360 radials. The resulting distance to principal community contours were used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which 2010 block centroids were contained in the polygon. (A block centroid is the center point of a small area containing population as computed by the U.S. Census Bureau.) The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total population for the predicted principal community coverage area. FM Stations The greater of the horizontal or vertical effective radiated power (ERP) (kW) and respective height above average terrain (HAAT) (m) combination was used. Where the antenna height above mean sea level (HAMSL) was available, it was used in lieu of the average HAAT figure to calculate specific HAAT figures for each of 360 radials under study. Any available directional pattern information was applied as well, to produce a radial-specific ERP figure. The HAAT and ERP figures were used in conjunction with the Field Strength (50-50) propagation curves specified in 47 CFR 73.313 of the Commission's rules to predict the distance to the principal community (70 dBu (decibel above 1 microVolt per meter) or 3.17 mV/m) contour for each of the 360 radials. The resulting distance to principal community contours were used to form a geographical polygon. Population counting was accomplished by determining which 2010 block centroids were contained in the polygon. The sum of the population figures for all enclosed blocks represents the total population for the predicted principal community coverage area. Table 7--FY 2015 Schedule of Regulatory Fees Regulatory fees for the first eight categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are submitted at the time the application is filed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Annual Fee category regulatory fee (U.S. $'s) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PLMRS (per license) (Exclusive Use) (47 CFR part 90).... 30 Microwave (per license) (47 CFR part 101)............... 20 Marine (Ship) (per station) (47 CFR part 80)............ 15 Marine (Coast) (per license) (47 CFR part 80)........... 35 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under 10 the Land Mobile category).............................. PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90)....... 10 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87)...... 10 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87)........ 20 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts .17 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90)............................. CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, .08 24 and 90)............................................. Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/MDS) (per 635, 635 license) (47 CFR part 27), Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) AM Radio Construction Permits........................... 590 FM Radio Construction Permits........................... 750 Digital TV (47 CFR part 73) VHF and UHF Commercial: Markets 1-10........................................ 46,825 Markets 11-25....................................... 43,200 Markets 26-50....................................... 27,625 Markets 51-100...................................... 16,275 Remaining Markets................................... 4,850 Construction Permits................................ 4,850 Satellite Television Stations (All Markets)............. 1,575 Low Power TV, Class A TV, TV/FM Translators & Boosters 440 (47 CFR part 74)....................................... CARS (47 CFR part 78)................................... 660 Cable Television Systems (per subscriber) (47 CFR part .96 76), Including IPTV.................................... Direct Broadcast Service (DBS) (per subscriber) (as .12 defined by section 602(13) of the Act)................. Interstate Telecommunication Service Providers (per .00331 revenue dollar)........................................ Toll Free (per toll free subscriber) (47 CFR section .12 52.101 (f) of the rules)............................... Earth Stations (47 CFR part 25)......................... 310 Space Stations (per operational station in geostationary 119,150 orbit) (47 CFR part 25) also includes DBS Service (per operational station) (47 CFR part 100)................. Space Stations (per operational system in non- 132,125 geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25).................. International Bearer Circuits--Terrestrial/Satellites .03 (per 64KB circuit)..................................... Submarine Cable Landing Licenses Fee (per cable system). See Table Below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 2015 Radio Station Regulatory Fees (Table 7 continued) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FM Classes A, FM Classes B, Population served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D B1 & C3 C, C0, C1 & C2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <=25,000................................................ $775 $645 $590 $670 $750 $925 25,001-75,000........................................... 1,550 1,300 900 1,000 1,500 1,625 75,001-150,000.......................................... 2,325 1,625 1,200 1,675 2,050 3,000 150,001-500,000......................................... 3,475 2,750 1,800 2,025 3,175 3,925 500,001-1,200,000....................................... 5,025 4,225 3,000 3,375 5,050 5,775 1,200,001-3,000,00...................................... 7,750 6,500 4,500 5,400 8,250 9,250 [[Page 35693]] >3,000,000.............................................. 9,300 7,800 5,700 6,750 10,500 12,025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- International Bearer Circuits--Submarine Cable (Table 7 Continued) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Submarine cable systems (capacity as of December 31, 2014) Fee amount ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <2.5 Gbps............................................... $7,175 2.5 Gbps or greater, but less than 5 Gbps............... 14,350 5 Gbps or greater, but less than 10 Gbps................ 28,675 10 Gbps or greater, but less than 20 Gbps............... 57,350 20 Gbps or greater...................................... 114,700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 1. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA),\88\ the Commission prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Written comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadline for comments on this NPRM. The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).\89\ In addition, the NPRM and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published in the Federal Register.\90\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \88\ 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601-612 has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996). \89\ 5 U.S.C. 603(a). \90\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Notice 2. The NPRM seeks comment regarding adopting proposed regulatory fees for Fiscal Year 2016. The proposed regulatory fees are attached to the NPRM in Table 4. The Commission is required by Congress to adopt regulatory fees each year ``to recover the costs of . . . enforcement activities, policy and rulemaking activities, user information services, and international activities.'' \91\ The NPRM proposes no new changes in the Commission's methodology, but does seek comment on the following. (i) As Direct Broadcast Satellites (DBS), along with other Multichannel Video Programming Distributors (MVPDs), receive oversight and regulation by Media Bureau FTEs in, e.g., the implementation of the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (CALM Act),\92\ the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA),\93\ and the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA) Reauthorization Act of 2014 (STELAR), the NPRM proposes an increase in the DBS fee rate to 27 cents per DBS subscriber. (ii) As radio stations expand in ever increasing large markets, the population threshold of ``greater than 3,000,000'' is no longer an adequate threshold. As a result, the NPRM proposes to raise the population threshold of broadcasters to ``greater than 6,000,000'' to reflect increases in the population in major broadcast markets. In addition, the Commission also proposes to adjust the fee rates of television stations to reflect a higher proportional fee for large markets compared to medium and smaller markets. (iii) The Commission seeks comment on how providers of international bearer circuits should count their circuits to maintain consistency across all carriers to ensure that all providers are calculating and reporting IBCs in the same manner. (iv) The Commission received a proposal from ITTA to combine CMRS and ITSP revenues together for the purpose of determining a single regulatory fee rate for the CMRS and ITSP regulatory fee categories. After reviewing ITTA's proposal, the Commission tentatively concludes not to combine wireless and interstate revenues, add a subcategory for CMRS in the ITSP fee category, or reallocate Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau for the purpose of calculating regulatory fees. The Commission does, however, seek comment on regulatory fee reform, including the reallocation of direct FTEs, including those FTEs working on universal service and numbering issues. (v) Finally, the Commission seeks comment on increasing earth station fees relative to space station fees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \91\ 47 U.S.C. 159(a). \92\ See Implementation of the Commercial Advertisement, Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, Report and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17222 (2011) (CALM Act Report and Order). \93\ Public Law Number 111-260, 124 Stat. 2751 (2010). See also Amendment of Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Public Law Number 111-265, 124 Stat. 2795 (2010) (making corrections to the CVAA); 47 CFR part 79. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Legal Basis 3. This action, including publication of proposed rules, is authorized under sections (4)(i) and (j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.\94\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \94\ 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 159, and 303(r). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Rules Will Apply 4. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be affected by the proposed rules and policies, if adopted.\95\ The RFA generally defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental jurisdiction.'' \96\ In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business Act.\97\ A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the SBA.\98\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \95\ 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3). \96\ 5 U.S.C. 601(6). \97\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small-business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' \98\ 15 U.S.C. 632. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Small Entities. Our actions, over time, may affect small entities that are not easily categorized at present. We therefore describe here, at the outset, three comprehensive small entity size standards that could be directly affected by the proposals under consideration.\99\ As of 2009, small businesses represented 99.9 percent of the 27.5 million businesses in the United States, according to the SBA.\100\ In addition, a [[Page 35694]] ``small organization is generally any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field.\101\ Nationwide, as of 2007, there were approximately 1,621,215 small organizations.\102\ In addition, the term ``small governmental jurisdiction'' is defined generally as ``governments of cities, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand.'' \103\ Census Bureau data for 2011 indicate that there were 90,056 local governmental jurisdictions in the United States.\104\ We estimate that, of this total, as many as 89,327 entities may qualify as ``small governmental jurisdictions.'' \105\ Thus, we estimate that most local government jurisdictions are small. Finally, small entities may include Responsible Organizations (RespOrgs), which are entities chosen by toll free subscribers to manage and administer the appropriate records in the toll free Service Management System for the toll free subscriber.\106\ Although RespOrgs are often wireline carriers, they can also include other non-carrier entities. Please refer to each group that is acting as a RespOrg identified in this section of the IRFA. From the data on the SMS/800 Web site,\107\ we estimate that there are approximately 459 RespOrgs, and applying the size standard of 1500 employees is appropriate because most RespOrgs at this time, are wireline-based or wireless-based. We believe that the majority of RespOrgs are small entities under that size standard.\108\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \99\ See 5 U.S.C. 601(3)-(6). \100\ See SBA, Office of Advocacy, ``Frequently Asked Questions,'' available at http://www.sba.gov/faqs/faqindex.cfm?arealD=24. \101\ 5 U.S.C. 601(4). \102\ See Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference (2010). \103\ 5 U.S.C. 601(5). \104\ See SBA, Office of Advocacy, ``Frequently Asked Questions,'' available at http.www.sba.gov/sites/default/files.FAQMarch201_O.pdf. \105\ The 2011 Census Data for small governmental organizations are not presented based on the size of the population in each organization. As stated above, there were 90,056 local governmental organizations in 2011. As a basis for estimating how many of these 90,056 local organizations were small, we note that there were a total of 729 cities and towns (incorporated places and civil divisions) with populations over 50,000. See http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk. If we subtract the 729 cities and towns that exceed the 50,000 population threshold, we conclude that approximately 789,237 are small. \106\ 47 CFR 52.101(b). \107\ https://www.somos.com/. SMS/800, Inc. is now Somos, Inc. \108\ See, e.g., 13 CFR 121.101; NAICS Code 517110; NAICS Code 517210. For purposes of this IRFA, because a substantial percentage of RespOrgs are wireless-based or wireline-based, the standard size applicable to these carriers is referenced. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Wired Telecommunications Carriers. The U.S. Census Bureau defines this industry as ``establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired communications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or a combination of technologies. Establishments in this industry use the wired telecommunications network facilities that they operate to provide a variety of services, such as wired telephony services, including VoIP services, wired (cable) audio and video programming distribution, and wired broadband internet services. By exception, establishments providing satellite television distribution services using facilities and infrastructure that they operate are included in this industry.'' \109\ The SBA has developed a small business size standard for Wired Telecommunications Carriers, which consists of all such companies having 1,500 or fewer employees.\110\ Census data for 2007 shows that there were 3,188 firms that operated that year. Of this total, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\111\ Thus, under this size standard, the majority of firms in this industry can be considered small. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \109\ See http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch. \110\ See 13 CFR 120.201, NAICS Code 517110. \111\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5 &prodType= table. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. Local Exchange Carriers (LECs). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a size standard for small businesses specifically applicable to local exchange services. The closest applicable NAICS Code category is for Wired Telecommunications Carriers as defined in paragraph 6 of this IRFA. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\112\ According to census data from 2007, there were 3,188 establishments that operated that year. Of this total, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\113\ The Commission estimates that most providers of local exchange service are small entities that may be affected by the rules and policies proposed in the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \112\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \113\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Incumbent LECs. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for incumbent local exchange services. The closest applicable NAICS Code category is Wired Telecommunications Carriers, as defined in paragraph 6 of this IRFA. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\114\ According to census data from 2007, 3,188 firms operated in that year. Of this total, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\115\ According to the Industry Analysis Branch of the Wireline Competition Bureau, 1,307 carriers reported that they were incumbent local exchange service providers.\116\ Of this total of 1,307 incumbent local exchange service providers, an estimated 1,006 operated with 1,500 or fewer employees \117\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that most providers of incumbent local exchange service are small businesses that may be affected by the rules and policies proposed in the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \114\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \115\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5 &prodType= table. \116\ See Trends in Telephone Service, Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry Analysis and Technology Division at Table 5.3 (Sept. 2010) (Trends in Telephone Service). \117\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (Competitive LECs), Competitive Access Providers (CAPs), Shared-Tenant Service Providers, and Other Local Service Providers. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for these service providers. The appropriate NAICS Code category is Wired Telecommunications Carriers, as defined in paragraph 6 of this IRFA. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\118\ U.S. Census data for 2007 indicate that 3,188 firms operated during that year. Of that number, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\119\ Based on this data, the Commission concludes that the majority of Competitive LECs, CAPs, Shared-Tenant Service Providers, and Other Local Service Providers are small entities. According to the Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 1,442 carriers reported that they were engaged in the provision of either competitive local exchange services or competitive access provider services.\120\ Of these 1,442 carriers, an estimated 1,256 have 1,500 or fewer employees. In addition, 17 carriers have reported that [[Page 35695]] they are Shared-Tenant Service Providers, and all 17 are estimated to have 1,500 or fewer employees.\121\ In addition, 72 carriers have reported that they are Other Local Service Providers.\122\ Of this total, 70 have 1,500 or fewer employees.\123\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that most providers of competitive local exchange service, competitive access providers, Shared-Tenant Service Providers, and Other Local Service Providers are small entities that may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to the proposals in this NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \118\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \119\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5&prodType=%20table. \120\ See Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \121\ Id. \122\ Id. \123\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. Interexchange Carriers (IXCs). Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a definition for Interexchange Carriers. The closest NAICS Code category is Wired Telecommunications Carriers as defined in paragraph 6 of this IRFA. The applicable size standard under SBA rules is that such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\124\ According to Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 359 companies reported that their primary telecommunications service activity was the provision of interexchange services.\125\ Of this total, an estimated 317 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 42 have more than 1,500 employees.\126\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of interexchange service providers are small entities that may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \124\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \125\ See Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \126\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Prepaid Calling Card Providers. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard specifically for prepaid calling card providers. The appropriate NAICS Code category for prepaid calling card providers is Telecommunications Resellers. This industry comprises establishments engaged in purchasing access and network capacity from owners and operators of telecommunications networks and reselling wired and wireless telecommunications services (except satellite) to businesses and households. Mobile virtual networks operators (MVNOs) are included in this industry.\127\ Under the applicable SBA size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\128\ U.S. Census data for 2007 show that 1,523 firms provided resale services during that year. Of that number, 1,522 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\129\ Thus, under this category and the associated small business size standard, the majority of these prepaid calling card providers can be considered small entities. According to Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 193 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of prepaid calling cards.\130\ All 193 carriers have 1,500 or fewer employees.\131\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of prepaid calling card providers are small entities that may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \127\ http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ssd/naics/naicsrch. \128\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517911. \129\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5&prodType=table. \130\ See Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \131\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Local Resellers. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for the category of Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\132\ Census data for 2007 show that 1,523 firms provided resale services during that year. Of that number, 1,522 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\133\ Under this category and the associated small business size standard, the majority of these local resellers can be considered small entities. According to Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 213 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of local resale services.\134\ Of this total, an estimated 211 have 1,500 or fewer employees.\135\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of local resellers are small entities that may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to the proposals in this NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \132\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517911. \133\ Id. \134\ See Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \135\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. Toll Resellers. The Commission has not developed a definition for Toll Resellers. The closest NAICS Code Category is Telecommunications Resellers, and the SBA has developed a small business size standard for the category of Telecommunications Resellers. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\136\ Census data for 2007 show that 1,523 firms provided resale services during that year. Of that number, 1,522 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\137\ Thus, under this category and the associated small business size standard, the majority of these resellers can be considered small entities. According to Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 881 carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of toll resale services.\138\ Of this total, an estimated 857 have 1,500 or fewer employees.\139\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of toll resellers are small entities that may be affected by our proposals in the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \136\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517911. \137\ Id. \138\ Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \139\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. Other Toll Carriers. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a size standard for small businesses specifically applicable to Other Toll Carriers. This category includes toll carriers that do not fall within the categories of interexchange carriers, operator service providers, prepaid calling card providers, satellite service carriers, or toll resellers. The closest applicable NAICS Code category is for Wired Telecommunications Carriers, as defined in paragraph 6 of this IRFA. Under that size standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.\140\ Census data for 2007 shows that there were 3,188 firms that operated that year. Of this total, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\141\ Thus, under this category and the associated small business size standard, the majority of Other Toll Carriers can be considered small. According to Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 284 companies reported that their primary telecommunications service activity was the provision of other toll carriage.\142\ Of these, an estimated 279 have 1,500 or fewer employees.\143\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that most Other Toll Carriers are small entities that may be affected by the rules adopted pursuant to the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \140\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \141\ Id. \142\ Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \143\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This industry comprises establishments engaged in operating and maintaining switching and transmission facilities to provide communications via the airwaves, such as cellular services, paging services, wireless Internet access, and wireless video services.\144\ The appropriate size [[Page 35696]] standard under SBA rules is that such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this industry, Census Data for 2007 show that there were 1,383 firms that operated for the entire year. Of this total, 1,368 firms had fewer than 1,000 employees. Thus under this category and the associated size standard, the Commission estimates that the majority of wireless telecommunications carriers (except satellite) are small entities. Similarly, according to internally developed Commission's Industry Analysis Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau data, 413 carriers reported that they were engaged in the provision of wireless telephony, including cellular service, Personal Communications Service (PCS), and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) services.\145\ Of this total, an estimated 261 have 1,500 or fewer employees.\146\ Consequently, the Commission estimates that approximately half of these firms can be considered small. Thus, using available data, we estimate that the majority of wireless firms can be considered small and may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to this NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \144\ NAICS Code 517210. See http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ssd/naics/naiscsrch. \145\ Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. \146\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16. Television Broadcasting. This Economic Census category ``comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting images together with sound. These establishments operate television broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the public.'' \147\ The SBA has created the following small business size standard for Television Broadcasting firms: those having $14 million or less in annual receipts.\148\ The Commission has estimated the number of licensed commercial television stations to be 1,387.\149\ In addition, according to Commission staff review of the BIA Advisory Services, LLC's Media Access Pro Television Database on March 28, 2012, about 950 of an estimated 1,300 commercial television stations (or approximately 73 percent) had revenues of $14 million or less.\150\ We therefore estimate that the majority of commercial television broadcasters are small entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \147\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ``515120 Television Broadcasting'' (partial definition); http://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND515120.HTM#N515120. \148\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120 (updated for inflation in 2010). \149\ See FCC News Release, ``Broadcast Station Totals as of December 31, 2011,'' dated January 6, 2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. \150\ We recognize that BIA's estimate differs slightly from the FCC total given supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17. We note, however, that in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above definition, business (control) affiliations \151\ must be included. Our estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of small entities that might be affected by our action, because the revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from affiliated companies. In addition, an element of the definition of ``small business'' is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. We are unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific television station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply does not exclude any television station from the definition of a small business on this basis and is therefore possibly over-inclusive to that extent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \151\ ``[Business concerns] are affiliates of each other when one concern controls or has the power to control the other or a third party or parties controls or has to power to control both.'' 13 CFR 21.103(a)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18. In addition, the Commission has estimated the number of licensed noncommercial educational (NCE) television stations to be 396.\152\ These stations are non-profit, and therefore considered to be small entities.\153\ There are also 2,528 low power television stations, including Class A stations (LPTV).\154\ Given the nature of these services, we will presume that all LPTV licensees qualify as small entities under the above SBA small business size standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \152\ See FCC News Release, ``Broadcast Station Totals as of December 31, 2011,'' dated January 6, 2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. \153\ See generally 5 U.S.C. 601(4), (6). \154\ See FCC News Release, ``Broadcast Station Totals as of December 31, 2011,'' dated January 6, 2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19. Radio Broadcasting. This Economic Census category ``comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting aural programs by radio to the public. Programming may originate in their own studio, from an affiliated network, or from external sources. \155\ The SBA has established a small business size standard for this category, which is: Such firms having $7 million or less in annual receipts.\156\ According to Commission staff review of BIA Advisory Services, LLC's Media Access Pro Radio Database on March 28, 2012, about 10,759 (97%) of 11,102 commercial radio stations had revenues of $7 million or less. Therefore, the majority of such entities are small entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \155\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ``515112 Radio Stations''; http://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND515112.HTM#N515112. \156\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515112 (updated for inflation in 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. We note, however, that in assessing whether a business concern qualifies as small under the above size standard, business affiliations must be included.\157\ In addition, to be determined to be a ``small business,'' the entity may not be dominant in its field of operation.\158\ We note that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media entities, and our estimate of small businesses may therefore be over-inclusive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \157\ ``Concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.'' 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1) (an SBA regulation). \158\ 13 CFR 121.102(b) (an SBA regulation). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21. Cable Television and other Subscription Programming.\159\ Since 2007, these services have been defined within the broad economic census category of Wired Telecommunications Carriers. That category is defined as follows: ``This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to [[Page 35697]] transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or a combination of technologies.'' \160\ The SBA has developed a small business size standard for this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees.\161\ Census data for 2007 shows that there were 3,188 firms that operated that year. Of this total, 3,144 had fewer than 1,000 employees.\162\ Thus under this size standard, the majority of firms offering cable and other program distribution services can be considered small and may be affected by rules adopted pursuant to the NPRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \159\ In 2014, ``Cable and Other Subscription Programming,'' NAICS Code 515210, replaced a prior category, now obsolete, which was called ``Cable and Other Program Distribution.'' Cable and Other Program Distribution, prior to 2014, were placed under NAICS Code 517110, Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Wired Telecommunications Carriers is still a current and valid NAICS Code Category. Because of the similarity between ``Cable and Other Subscription Programming'' and ``Cable and other Program Distribution,'' we will, in this proceeding, continue to use Wired Telecommunications Carrier data based on the U.S. Census. The alternative of using data gathered under Cable and Other Subscription Programming (NAICS Code 515210) is unavailable to us for two reasons. First, the size standard established by the SBA for Cable and Other Subscription Programming is annual receipts of $38.5 million or less. Thus to use the annual receipts size standard would require the Commission either to switch from existing employee based size standard of 1,500 employees or less for Wired Telecommunications Carriers, or else would require the use of two size standards. No official approval of either option has been granted by the Commission as of the time of the release of the Notice. Second, the data available under the size standard of $38.5 million dollars or less is not applicable at this time, because the only currently available U.S. Census data for annual receipts of all businesses operating in the NAICS Code category of 515210 (Cable and other Subscription Programming) consists only of total receipts for all businesses operating in this category in 2007 and of total annual receipts for all businesses operatin6 in this category in 2012. Hence the data do not provide any basis for determining, for either year, how many businesses were small because they had annual receipts of $38.5 million or less. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2012_US_51I2&prodType=table. \160\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ``517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers'' (partial definition), (full definition stated in para. 6 of this IRFA) available at http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch. \161\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. \162\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5&prodType=Table">http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5&prodType=Table. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22. Cable Companies and Systems. The Commission has developed its own small business size standards for the purpose of cable rate regulation. Under the Commission's rules, a ``small cable company'' is one serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers nationwide.\163\ Industry data indicate that there are currently 4,600 active cable systems in the United States.\164\ Of this total, all but ten cable operators nationwide are small under the 400,000-subscriber size standard.\165\ In addition, under the Commission's rate regulation rules, a ``small system'' is a cable system serving 15,000 or fewer subscribers.\166\ Current Commission records show 4,600 cable systems nationwide.\167\ Of this total, 3,900 cable systems have less than 15,000 subscribers, and 700 systems have 15,000 or more subscribers, based on the same records.\168\ Thus, under this standard as well, the Commission estimates that most cable systems are small entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \163\ 47 CFR 76.901(e). \164\ August 15, 2015 Report from the Media Bureau based on data contained in the Commission's Cable Operations And Licensing System (COALS). See www/fcc.gov/coals. \165\ See SNL KAGAN at www.snl.com/interactiveX/top cableMSOs aspx?period2015Q1&sortcol=subscribersbasic&sortorder=desc. \166\ 47 CFR 76.901(c). \167\ See footnote 2, supra. \168\ August 5, 2015 report from the Media Bureau based on its research in COALS. See www.fcc.gov/coals. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23. Cable System Operators (Telecom Act Standard). The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, also contains a size standard for small cable system operators, which is ``a cable operator that, directly or through an affiliate, serves in the aggregate fewer than 1 percent of all subscribers in the United States and is not affiliated with any entity or entities whose gross annual revenues in the aggregate exceed $250,000,000 are approximately 52,403,705 cable video subscribers in the United States today.\169\ Accordingly, an operator serving fewer than 524,037 subscribers shall be deemed a small operator if its annual revenues, when combined with the total annual revenues of all its affiliates, do not exceed $250 million in the aggregate.\170\ Based on available data, we find that all but nine incumbent cable operators are small entities under this size standard.\171\ We note that the Commission neither requests nor collects information on whether cable system operators are affiliated with entities whose gross annual revenues exceed $250 million.\172\ Although it seems certain that some of these cable system operators are affiliated with entities whose gross annual revenues exceed $250,000,000, we are unable at this time to estimate with greater precision the number of cable system operators that would qualify as small cable operators under the definition in the Communications Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \169\ See SNL KAGAN at www.snl.com/interactivex/MultichannelIndustryBenchmarks.aspx. \170\ 47 CFR 76.901(f) and notes ff. 1, 2, and 3. \171\ See SNL KAGAN at www.snl.com/Interactivex/TopCableMSOs.aspx. \172\ The Commission does receive such information on a case-by- case basis if a cable operator appeals a local franchise authority's finding that the operator does not qualify as a small cable operator pursuant to section 76.901(f) of the Commission's rules. See 47 CFR 76.901(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) Service. DBS Service is a nationally distributed subscription service that delivers video and audio programming via satellite to a small parabolic dish antenna at the subscriber's location. DBS is now included in SBA's economic census category ``Wired Telecommunications Carriers.'' The Wired Telecommunications Carriers industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology or combination of technologies. Establishments in this industry use the wired telecommunications network facilities that they operate to provide a variety of services, such as wired telephony services, including VOIP services, wired (cable) audio and video programming distribution; and wired broadband internet services. By exception, establishments providing satellite television distribution services using facilities and infrastructure that they operate are included in this industry.\173\ The SBA determines that a wireline business is small if it has fewer than 1500 employees.\174\ Census data for 2007 indicate that 3,188 wireline companies were operational during that year. Of that number, 3,144 operated with fewer than 1,000 employees.\175\ Based on that data, we conclude that the majority of wireline firms are small under the applicable standard. However, currently only two entities provide DBS service, which requires a great deal of capital for operation: DIRECTV (now owned by AT&T) and DISH Network.\176\ DIRECTV and DISH Network each report annual revenues that are in excess of the threshold for a small business. Accordingly, we must conclude that internally developed FCC data are persuasive that in general DBS service is provided only by large firms. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \173\ http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch. \174\ NAICs CODE 517110; 13.CFR 121.201. \175\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ECN_2007_US_51SSSZ5&prodType=table. \176\ See 15th Annual Video Competition Report, 28 FCC Rcd at 1057, Section 27. As of June 2012, DIRECTV is the largest DBS operator and the second largest MVPD in the United States, serving 19.9 million subscribers. DISH Network is the second largest DBS operator and the third largest MVPD operator, serving 14 million subscribers. Id. at 10507, 10546, section 27, 110-11. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25. All Other Telecommunications. ``All Other Telecommunications'' is defined as follows: This U.S. industry is comprised of establishments that are primarily engaged in providing specialized telecommunications services, such as satellite tracking, communications telemetry, and radar station operation. This industry also includes establishments primarily engaged in providing satellite terminal stations and associated facilities connected with one or more terrestrial systems and capable of transmitting telecommunications to, and receiving telecommunications from, satellite systems. Establishments providing Internet services or voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services via client-supplied telecommunications connections are also included in this industry.\177\ The SBA has developed a small business size standard for ``All Other Telecommunications,'' which consists of all such firms with gross [[Page 35698]] annual receipts of $32.5 million or less.\178\ For this category, census data for 2007 show that there were 2,383 firms that operated for the entire year. Of these firms, a total of 2,346 had gross annual receipts of less than $25 million.\179\ Thus, a majority of ``All Other Telecommunications'' firms potentially affected by the proposals in the NPRM can be considered small. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \177\ http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ssssd/naics/naicsrch. \178\ 13 CFR 121.201; NAICs Code 517919. \179\ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices.jasf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid+ECN_2007_US.51SSSZ4&prodType=table. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements 26. This NPRM does not propose any changes to the Commission's current information collection, reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements. E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered 27. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its approach, which may include the following four alternatives, among others: (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities.\180\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \180\ 5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(c)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 28. This NPRM seeks comment on the Commission's regulatory fee collection for Fiscal Year 2016, as required by Congress each year. Specifically, we ask for comments each year in the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis on how to minimize adverse economic impact, imposed by our proposed rules, on small entities. The regulatory fees proposed in this NPRM do not include any new fee categories. However, the proposal in FY 2016 to revise the broadcasters' fee grid to include a threshold ``greater than 6,000,000'', and a change in the television fee amounts so that large markets pay a higher proportional fee than small and medium-sized markets, will provide some relief to small broadcast and television entities. The increase in the de minimis amount to $500 implemented in FY 2015 has already provided financial relief to smaller entities. F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules 29. None. VII. Ordering Clauses 30. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 9, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is hereby adopted. 31. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-13087 Filed 6-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
![35680 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
PROPOSED ACTION ON LOUISIANA INFRASTRUCTURE SIP SUBMITTAL FOR VARIOUS NAAQS—Continued
2006 2008 2008 2010 2010 2012
Element PM2.5 Pb Ozone NO2 SO2 PM2.5
(D)(i)(II): PSD (requirement 3) ..................................................... A A A A A A
(D)(i)(II): Visibility Protection (requirement 4) .............................. D A D D D D
(D)(ii): Interstate and International Pollution Abatement ............. A A A A A A
(E)(i): Adequate resources ........................................................... A A A A A A
(E)(ii): State boards ...................................................................... A A A A A A
(E)(iii): Necessary assurances with respect to local agencies .... A A A A A A
(F): Stationary source monitoring system .................................... A A A A A A
(G): Emergency power ................................................................. A A A A A A
(H): Future SIP revisions ............................................................. A A A A A A
(I): Nonattainment area plan or plan revisions under part D ...... + + + + + +
(J)(i): Consultation with government officials ............................... A A A A A A
(J)(ii): Public notification ............................................................... A A A A A A
(J)(iii): PSD ................................................................................... A A A A A A
(J)(iv): Visibility protection ............................................................ + + + + + +
(K): Air quality modeling and data ............................................... A A A A A A
(L): Permitting fees ...................................................................... A A A A A A
(M): Consultation and participation by affected local entities ...... A A A A A A
Key to Table 1: Proposed action on LA infrastructure SIP submittals for various NAAQS
A—Approve
A*—Approved at an earlier date
+—Not germane to infrastructure SIPs
No action—EPA is taking no action on this infrastructure requirements
NA—Not applicable
D—Disapprove
Based upon review of the state’s of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 country, the proposed rule does not
infrastructure SIP submissions and U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); have tribal implications and will not
relevant statutory and regulatory • Is certified as not having a impose substantial direct costs on tribal
authorities and provisions referenced in significant economic impact on a governments or preempt tribal law as
these submissions or referenced in substantial number of small entities specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
Louisiana’s SIP, EPA believes that under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Louisiana has the infrastructure in place U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
to address all applicable required
elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) mandate or significantly or uniquely Environmental protection, Air
(except as noted in table above) to affect small governments, as described pollution control, Incorporation by
ensure that the 2006 PM2.5, 2008 Pb, in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act reference, Intergovernmental relations,
2008 O3, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2012 of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Interstate transport of pollution, Lead,
PM2.5 NAAQS are implemented in the • Does not have Federalism Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
state. implications as specified in Executive matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, requirements, Sulfur oxides.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order 1999);
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Reviews • Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or Dated: May 18, 2016.
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a safety risks subject to Executive Order Ron Curry,
SIP submission that complies with the 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Regional Administrator, Region 6.
• Is not a significant regulatory action [FR Doc. 2016–13032 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am]
provisions of the Act and applicable
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
28355, May 22, 2001);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP • Is not subject to requirements of
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve Section 12(d) of the National
state choices, provided that they meet FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
Technology Transfer and Advancement
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. COMMISSION
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
Accordingly, this action merely application of those requirements would
proposes to approve state law as 47 CFR Part 1
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
meeting Federal requirements and does • Does not provide EPA with the [MD Docket Nos. 16–166; FCC 16–61]
not impose additional requirements discretionary authority to address, as
beyond those imposed by state law. For appropriate, disproportionate human Assessment and Collection of
that reason, this action: health or environmental effects, using Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2016
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory practicable and legally permissible AGENCY: Federal Communications
action’’ subject to review by the Office methods, under Executive Order 12898 Commission.
of Management and Budget under (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, The SIP is not approved to apply on
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, any Indian reservation land or in any SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal
January 21, 2011); other area where EPA or an Indian tribe Communications Commission
• Does not impose an information has demonstrated that a tribe has (Commission) will revise its Schedule of
collection burden under the provisions jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian Regulatory Fees in order to recover an
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35683
Report and Order, the Commission enforcement activities, policy and well as the Satellite Television
added a subcategory for Direct rulemaking activities, user information Extension and Localism Act (STELA)
Broadcast Satellite (DBS) providers (in services, and international activities.’’ 25 Reauthorization Act of 2014
the cable television and IPTV regulatory We seek comment on the proposed (STELAR).36
fee category) based on the finding that regulatory fee schedule in Table 4. 14. FY 2015 was the first time the
Media Bureau FTEs work on issues and Commission assessed a regulatory fee
1. DBS Regulatory Fees as a Subcategory for DBS based on Media Bureau FTEs.
proceedings that include DBS as well as
in the Cable Television and IPTV At that time, the Commission concluded
other multichannel video programming
Category an initial rate of 12 cents per subscriber
distributors (MVPDs).18 In addition, in
the FY 2015 NPRM and Report and 13. This proposed fee schedule per year was a sensible fee supported by
Order, we sought comment on revising includes an updated regulatory fee for data and analysis for FY 2015.37 In
the regulatory fee schedule for DBS, a subcategory in the cable adopting the regulatory fee for DBS as
broadcasters.19 television and IPTV category.26 In 2015, a subcategory of cable television and
the Commission adopted the initial IPTV category, the Commission
IV. Discussion regulatory fee for DBS, as a subcategory explained that ‘‘although DBS is not
A. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the cable television and IPTV identical to cable television and IPTV,
category, of 12 cents per year per the services all receive oversight and
11. We propose to collect
subscriber, or one cent per month.27 At regulation as a result of the work of
$384,012,497 in regulatory fees for FY
that time, the Commission stated that it Media Bureau FTEs on MVPD issues.
2016, pursuant to section 9 of the
would update the rate for FY 2016, as The burden imposed on the
Communications Act.20 Of this amount,
necessary for ensuring an appropriate Commission is therefore similar.’’ 38 At
we project approximately $21.4 million
level of regulatory parity and the same time, the Commission also
(5.56 percent of the total FTE allocation)
considering the resources dedicated to explained that it would examine the
in fees from the International Bureau
this subcategory.28 When the appropriate allocation between and
regulatees; 21 $81.9 million (21.3 percent
Commission adopted this regulatory fee among MVPD regulatees in the coming
of the total FTE allocation) in fees from
subcategory for DBS, the Commission years as the Commission implemented
the Wireless Telecommunications observed that numerous regulatory
Bureau regulatees; 22 $133.97 million the new DBS fee.39 Such examination is
developments had increased the Media
(34.95 percent of the total FTE Bureau FTE activity involving 36 The STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014
allocation) from the Media Bureau regulation and oversight of MVPDs, (STELAR), Public Law 113–200, 128 Stat. 2059
regulatees; 23 and $146.8 million (38.19 including DBS providers.29 For (2014). STELAR was enacted on December 4, 2014
percent of the total FTE allocation) from example, DBS providers (and cable (H.R. 5728, 113th Cong.). Commission work on
Wireline Competition Bureau implementation of the Act was immediate. See, e.g.,
television operators) are permitted to Implementation of Sections 101, 103 and 105 of the
regulatees.24 file program access complaints 30 and STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Order, 30 FCC
12. These regulatory fees are complaints seeking relief under the Rcd 2380 (2015) (implementing certain STELAR
mandated by Congress and are collected retransmission consent good faith provisions under the ‘‘good cause’’ exception to the
‘‘to recover the costs of . . . Administrative Procedure Act); Amendment to the
rules; 31 DBS providers are subject to Commission’s Rules Concerning Market
18 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees
MVPD requirements such as those Modification, Implementation of Section 102 of the
pertaining to program carriage; 32 and STELA Reauthorization Act of 2014, Report and
for Fiscal Year 2015, Notice of Proposed Order, 30 FCC Rcd 10406 (2015) (adopting satellite
Rulemaking, Report and Order, and Order, 30 FCC they are subject to the requirement to
television market modification rules to enable
Rcd 5354, 5364–5373, paras. 28–41 (2015) (FY 2015 negotiate retransmission consent in satellite carriers, cable operators, and commercial
NPRM and Report and Order). We also eliminated good faith.33 In addition, the television stations to better serve the interests of
two additional fee categories. See id., 30 FCC Rcd
at 5361–62, paras. 19–22.
Commission, in recent years, adopted their local communities); Implementation of
numerous requirements that apply to all Section 103 of the STELA Reauthorization Act of
19 Id., 30 FCC Rcd at 5359, para. 13. In the FY
2014, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd
2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, we sought MVPDs, and thus DBS providers, as part 10327 (2015) (seeking comment on potential
further comment on the broadcast regulatory fees of its implementation of the Commercial updates to the ‘‘totality of the circumstances’’ test
issue and also sought comment on ITTA’s proposal Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act for good faith negotiation of retransmission
to reallocate FTEs in the Wireline Competition consent); Final Report of the DSTAC, available at
Bureau. Assessment and Collection of Regulatory (CALM Act),34 the Twenty-First Century
https://transition.fcc.gov/dstac/dstac-report-final-
Fees for Fiscal Year 2015, Report and Order and Communications and Video 08282015.pdf; ‘‘Media Bureau Seeks Comment on
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA),35 as DSTAC Report,’’ Public Notice, DA 15–982, 2015
Rcd 10268, 10279–282, paras. 27–34 (2015) (FY WL 5164960 (MB 2015); ‘‘Media Bureau Seeks
2015 Report and Order and FNPRM). 25 47 Comment for Report Required by the STELA
20 47 U.S.C. 159. The proposed regulatory fee
U.S.C. 159(a).
26 DBS also pays a regulatory per operational Reauthorization Act of 2014,’’ Public Notice, 30
rates for FY 2016 include $339,844,000 for FCC Rcd 1904 (2015) (seeking information for a
station in geostationary orbit.
operational expenses and an additional one time 27 FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC report to Congress on designated market areas and
amount of $44,168,497 to offset facilities reduction, considerations for fostering increased localism).
Rcd at 10276–77, paras. 19–20.
i.e., reduce our office space footprint and move the 37 See FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30
28 Id., 30 FCC Rcd at 10277, para. 20.
FCC office location if necessary. Consolidated FCC Rcd at 10276–77, para. 20. The agency is not
29 See FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30
Appropriations Act, 2016, Public Law 114–113, required to calculate its costs with ‘‘scientific
Dec. 18, 2015. Due to the facilities reduction, FCC Rcd at 5367–68, para. 31.
30 47 U.S.C. 548; 47 CFR 76.1000–1004.
precision.’’ Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff
regulatees’ aggregate fees by category increased on Ass’n v. United States, 777 F.2d 722, 736 (D.C. Cir.
average by approximately 11–13 percent for 2016. 31 47 U.S.C. 325(b)(1), (3)(C)(ii); 47 CFR 76.65(b).
1985). Reasonable approximations will suffice. Id.;
21 Includes satellites, earth stations, submarine 32 47 U.S.C. 536; 47 CFR 76.1300–1302.
Mississippi Power & Light, 601 F.2d 223, 232 (5th
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
cable, and bearer circuits. 33 47 U.S.C. 325(b)(3)(C)(iii); 47 CFR 76.65(a)–(b). Cir. 1979); National Cable Television Ass’n v. FCC,
22 Includes Commercial Mobile Radio Service 34 See Implementation of the Commercial 554 F.2d 1094, 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
(CMRS), CMRS messaging, Broadband Radio Advertisement, Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, 38 FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC
Service/Local Multipoint Distribution Service (BRS/ Report and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17222 (2011) (CALM Rcd at 5369, para. 33.
LMDS), and multi-year wireless licensees. Act Report and Order). 39 FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC
23 Includes AM radio, FM radio, television, low 35 Public Law 111–260, 124 Stat. 2751 (2010). See Rcd at 5367–68, para. 34, n.129 (The Commission
power/FM, cable television and IPTV, DBS, and also Amendment of Twenty-First Century explained that ‘‘[e]ven when an industry has
Cable Television Relay Service (CARS) licenses. Communications and Video Accessibility Act of oversight generally by one organizational unit
24 Includes Interstate Telecommunications 2010, Public Law 111–265, 124 Stat. 2795 (2010) within the Commission, we are sensitive to the fact
Service Providers (ITSP) and toll free numbers. (making corrections to the CVAA); 47 CFR part 79. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35685
stations in markets 26–50 pay.51 The accurately calculate and report IBCs.55 calculating fees? For example, should
Commission did not receive comments The Commission reminded facilities- the Commission require carriers to
on this proposal. At this time, the based common carriers that they must report the total amount of international
Commission tentatively concludes that include all common carrier circuits used revenue rather than the number of
this proposal will make the regulatory by themselves or their affiliates when circuits? How do carriers identify their
fees for television broadcasters more calculating the number of active international revenues? How can the
rational. Accordingly, the Commission circuits. The Commission also indicated Commission ensure carriers are
seeks comment on the regulatory fees that we will review the processes for accurately reporting both common
for television broadcasters as set forth in reporting IBCs in the near future to carrier and non-common carrier
Table 4. ensure that all carriers are reporting terrestrial circuits? Finally, how can the
IBCs in the same manner, consistent Commission improve the requirements
TABLE 2 with our rules. In this regard, the and regulatory treatment of terrestrial
Commission seeks comment on how we and satellite services for purposes of
FY 2016 Television station regulatory fees can ensure that all providers are regulatory fees?
(proposed) calculating and reporting IBCs in the
4. Other Regulatory Fee Reform
Digital TV (47 CFR FY 2016
same manner. What criteria do
part 73) VHF and FY 2015 Proposed providers use to distinguish common a. ITTA Proposal
Fee rates carrier terrestrial circuits from non-
UHF commercial fee rates 22. In the FY 2015 Report and Order
common carrier terrestrial circuits for and FNPRM, the Commission sought
Markets 1–10 ........ $46,825 $60,775 regulatory fee purposes?
comment on ITTA’s proposals to
Markets 11–25 ...... 43,200 45,750 21. As the Commission has stated in
Markets 26–50 ...... 27,625 30,575 the past, non-common carrier terrestrial combine wireless voice and wireline
Markets 51–100 .... 16,275 15,225 circuits play an important role in the services into the ITSP category 58 or,
Remaining Markets 4,850 5,000 alternatively, to re-assign certain
Construction Per-
provision of international services Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs to
mits .................... 4,850 5,000 through microwave and fiber links other fee categories, for regulatory fee
across the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico purposes. The Commission also sought
19. The Commission also recognizes borders, and the Commission regularly comment on adopting a new regulatory
that the incentive auction scheduled for engages with counterparts in Canada fee category for CMRS, as a subcategory
2016 is a substantial event for the and Mexico on a wide range of issues of the ITSP regulatory fee category.59
television broadcast industry. As a related to cross-border The Commission has had an
result, in the FY 2015 Report and Order communications. In 2009, the
56
opportunity to further review ITTA’s
and FNPRM, the Commission sought Commission explored whether carriers proposals and, as we explain below, we
comment on whether, when, and how should be assessed regulatory fees for tentatively conclude that combining the
the Commission should adjust its their terrestrial non-common carrier wireline and wireless categories,
methodology for assessing regulatory circuits, but declined to do so at that reassigning Wireline Competition
fees on television stations to respond to time because of the ‘‘complexity of the Bureau FTEs to the Wireless
such potential changed circumstances legal, policy and equity issues Telecommunications Bureau, and/or
consistent with the provisions of section involved.’’ Since that time, the
57
adopting a new subcategory for CMRS
9 of the Communications Act.52 While telecommunications industry and in the ITSP regulatory fee category are
the Commission received comments on Commission’s rules have evolved, and not consistent with Commission orders
the issue,53 it is too early to revise our the Commission now seeks comment on implementing section 9 of the
whether it would be more equitable to Communications Act.
regulatory fee apportionment because of
no longer distinguish common carrier 23. The Commission has stated that
the uncertainty in events that have yet
terrestrial circuits from non-common ‘‘[g]iven the significant implications of
to happen. The Commission intends to
carrier terrestrial circuits for regulatory reassignment of FTEs in our fee
consider any changed circumstances
fee purposes. If the Commission
due to the incentive auction as part of
requires carriers providing international 58 ITTA Comments at 4–9. See FY 2015 Report
the FY 2017 regulatory fee proceeding.
service over terrestrial circuits to pay and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Rcd at 10281–82,
3. International Services: Terrestrial and IBC regulatory fees for their non- paras. 31–34. ITTA had proposed this previously.
See, e.g., Assessment and Collection of Regulatory
Satellite Services common carrier circuits, what is the Fees for Fiscal Year 2014, Notice of Proposed
20. Facilities-based common carriers least burdensome methodology for Rulemaking, 29 FCC Rcd 6417, 6430–31, paras. 36–
39 (2014) (FY 2014 NPRM); Assessment and
must pay regulatory fees for terrestrial 55 FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2013,
and satellite International Bearer Rcd 10268, 10283–85, para. 40 and n.128. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice
Circuits (IBCs) active (used or leased) as 56 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees of Proposed Rulemaking, 28 FCC Rcd 7790, 7796,
of December 31 of the prior year in any for Fiscal Year 2009, Notice of Proposed para. 12 (2013) (FY 2013 NPRM); Assessment and
Rulemaking and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 5966, 5971, Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008,
terrestrial or satellite transmission Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
para. 14 (2009).
facility for the provision of service to an 57 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 6388, 6404–05, paras. 40–
end user or resale carrier.54 In the FY for Fiscal Year 2009, Report and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 41 (2008) (FY 2008 FNPRM).
59 FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC
2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, the 10301, 10306–307, paras. 16–17 (2009). On March
17, 2009, the Commission adopted in the Rcd at 10282, para. 34. ITTA and ACA argue that
Commission asked facilities-based such change is supported by the fact that many
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Submarine Cable Order a new submarine cable
common carriers to review their bearer circuit methodology that allocates IBC costs proceedings in the Wireline Competition Bureau
reporting processes to ensure that they among service providers in an equitable and proceedings, and elsewhere, such as those
competitively neutral manner, without involving universal service, intercarrier
51 FY distinguishing between common carriers and non- compensation, pole attachments, rural call
2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC completion, number portability, 911 access, and
common carriers, by assessing a flat per cable
Rcd at 10280–81, para. 29. special access, affect wireless service providers.
landing license fee for all submarine cable systems.
52 FY 2015 Report and Order and FNPRM, 30 FCC
Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for ITTA Comments at 9–10; ACA Comments at 4–7.
Rcd at 10281, para. 30. Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24 FCC CTIA opposes this proposal as arbitrary and
53 NAB Comments at 2–7.
Rcd 4208, 4214–16, paras. 13–17 (2009) (Submarine capricious as well as in violation of section 9 of the
54 See para. 22 infra. Cable Order). Act. CTIA Comments at 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/6.svg)
![35686 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
calculation, we make changes to FTE seven on the rural healthcare program, and with the Commission’s allocation
classifications only after performing and seven on universal service policies with respect to direct and
considerable analysis and finding the contributions).64 Of the 92 FTEs in the indirect FTEs.68 Commenters should
clearest case for reassignment.’’ 60 In this Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, also address the Commission’s goal of
instance, ITTA contends that the staff estimate that the equivalent of ensuring that regulatory fees are
Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs approximately five FTEs work roughly administrable and sustainable.69
working on universal service issues and full time on universal service issues
b. Earth Stations
other proceedings benefit categories of (primarily the high-cost program). If we
service providers other than ITSPs, were to reallocate, for regulatory fee 26. In the FY 2014 NPRM, the
particularly CMRS providers, and purposes, some proportion of the direct Commission sought comment on
therefore should be considered in FTEs, what should that proportion be? increasing the earth station regulatory
calculating the CMRS regulatory fee.61 Any proposals should demonstrate fee allocation in order to reflect more
Based on our own detailed analysis, as policy or legal arguments supporting appropriately the number of FTEs
well as the fact that the Wireless reallocating some proportion of devoted to the regulation and oversight
Telecommunications Bureau assigns its numbering and/or USF FTEs as indirect. of the earth station portion of the
own FTEs to coordinate with the In doing so, the Commission would satellite industry.70 In the FY 2014
Wireline Competition Bureau on invite comment on whether some or all regulatory fee proceeding, the
relevant wireless issues, we tentatively of the FTEs that work on universal Commission increased the regulatory
conclude that a clear case for service contributions, the schools and fees paid by earth station licensees by
reassignment of Wireline Competition libraries program, or the rural healthcare approximately 7.5 percent based on our
Bureau FTEs to the Wireless program, should be reallocated as analysis and review of the record.71 In
Telecommunications Bureau is not indirect FTEs. Should the Commission the FY 2015 NPRM and Report and
demonstrated in this instance. Our reallocate some proportion of the FTEs Order, the Commission sought comment
analysis of the Wireline Competition from each bureau that work on the high- on whether to raise the earth station
Bureau FTE work on wireline issues cost program, given the participation of regulatory fees again.72 We concluded,
that also affect the CMRS industry does non-wireline and wireless regulatees in however, that the issue required further
not support adopting a new subcategory the Connect America Fund proceedings? analysis, in part because the then-
for CMRS in the ITSP regulatory fee What proportion, if any, of the FTEs that pending part 25 proceeding
category—and thus assessing regulatory work on numbering issues and the streamlining the satellite licensing rules
fees on CMRS based on both Wireless lifeline program should the Commission might affect the distribution of FTE
Telecommunications Bureau FTEs and reallocate given that a significant work.73 An Order was adopted in that
Wireline Competition Bureau FTEs, as number of regulatees benefiting from proceeding in December 2015, and
ITTA proposes.62 Further, ITTA’s those programs are not wireline accordingly it is timely to again seek
proposal to combine these regulatory fee regulatees? Is there some proportion of comment on whether to increase the
categories does not appear to address these FTEs whose ‘‘activities benefit the regulatory fees paid by earth station
the substantial differences between the Commission as a whole and are not licensees.74 In this context, we seek
services in terms of regulatory oversight specifically focused on [core bureau] comment on EchoStar’s proposal to
by the two bureaus. Thus, at this regulatees’’? 65 Commenters’ proposals
juncture, the Commission does not find for FTE reallocation should be international activities.’’ 47 U.S.C. 159(a). The
regulatory fees are to ‘‘be derived by determining
that the ‘‘clearest case of reassignment’’ consistent with the section 9 the full-time equivalent number of employees
exists based on the considerable requirement that regulatory fees are to performing’’ these activities, ‘‘adjusted to take into
analysis we have conducted. ‘‘be derived by determining the full-time account factors that are reasonably related to the
24. The Commission nevertheless equivalent number of employees benefits provided to the payer of the fee by the
Commission’s activities . . . .’’ 47 U.S.C.
seeks comment on whether it would be performing’’ Commission activities, 159(b)(1)(A).
appropriate to allocate some proportion ‘‘adjusted to take into account factors 68 FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at
of the direct FTEs that devote time to that are reasonably related to the 12354–55, paras. 10–12 (adopting use of current
universal service and/or numbering benefits provided to the payer of the fee FTE data for purposes of regulatory fee calculations
as opposed to 1998 FTE data previously used); id.
issues as additional indirect FTEs.63 by the Commission’s activities . . . .’’ 66 at 12357–58, paras. 19–20 (‘‘It would be
Based on staff estimates looking back 25. The Commission notes that inconsistent with section 9 to delay reallocating the
over a 6 to 12 month period, of the 165 incorrect allocation of FTEs to a International Bureau FTEs, where the reallocation
FTEs in the Wireline Competition particular core bureau may is clearly warranted, while we engage in
painstaking examinations of less clear and more
Bureau, approximately seven FTEs work disproportionately impact regulatees factually complex situations in other bureaus. . . .
on numbering issues and 52 FTEs work given that indirect FTEs are allocated At the same time, however, we recognize that a
on universal service issues proportionally based on the direct FTE reexamination of how FTEs are allocated
(approximately 16 on the high-cost percentage attributable to a particular throughout the Commission is an indispensable
part of comprehensively revising the Commission’s
program, 13 on the schools and libraries core bureau. The Commission also notes regulatory fee program.’’); FY 2013 NPRM, 28 FCC
program, nine on the Lifeline program that any change in the allocation of Rcd at 7793–95, 7796–99, 7803, paras. 7–10, 15–19,
for low income consumers (lifeline), FTEs necessarily affects the fees paid by 29 (generally explaining prior FTE allocation
payors in all other fee categories. We methodology and proposing methodology changes).
69 FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at
60 FY 2013 Report and Order, 28 FCC Rcd at
seek comment on whether this proposal 12354, para 9.
12357, para. 19. The Commission observed that the is consistent with section 9 of the Act 67
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
70 FY 2014 NPRM, 29 FCC Rcd at 6428, para. 29.
International Bureau was a ‘‘singular case’’ because
71 See FY 2014 Report and Order, 29 FCC Rcd at
the work of those FTEs ‘‘primarily benefits
64 These estimates can vary as discussed above
licensees regulated by other bureaus.’’ Id., 28 FCC 10772–73, para. 12.
Rcd at 12355, para. 14. and do not represent an entire fiscal year. 72 FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC
65 FY 2013 NPRM, 28 FCC Rcd at 7803, para. 28.
61 ITTA Comments at 10. Rcd at 5360, para. 14.
62 See Letter from Micah M. Caldwell, ITTA, to 66 47 U.S.C. 159(b)(1)(A). (Emphasis added). 73 FY 2015 NPRM and Report and Order, 30 FCC
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (January 22, 67 Section 9 of the Communications Act requires Rcd at 5360, para. 14.
2016). regulatory fees collected ‘‘to recover the costs of 74 See Comprehensive Review of Licensing and
63 Currently, indirect FTEs in various bureaus and . . . enforcement activities, policy and rulemaking Operating Rules for Satellite Services, Second
offices work on universal service issues. activities, user information services, and Report and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 14713 (2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/7.svg)
![35688 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory fees also must be paid for common carrier satellite operators must Commission will then review the
CARS licenses that were granted on or pay a fee for each circuit they and their revised count and supporting
before October 1, 2015. In instances affiliates hold and each circuit sold or documentation and either approve or
where a permit or license is transferred leased to any customer, other than an disapprove the submission in Fee Filer.
or assigned after October 1, 2015, international common carrier If the submission is disapproved, the
responsibility for payment rests with the authorized by the Commission to Commission will contact the provider to
holder of the permit or license as of the provide U.S. international common afford the provider an opportunity to
fee due date. carrier services. For these purposes, discuss its revised subscriber count and/
• International Services: Regulatory ‘‘active circuits’’ include backup and or provide additional supporting
fees must be paid for (1) earth stations redundant circuits as of December 31,
documentation. If we receive no
and (2) geostationary orbit space 2015. Whether circuits are used
stations and non-geostationary orbit response from the provider, or we do
specifically for voice or data is not
satellite systems that were licensed and relevant for purposes of determining not reverse our initial disapproval of the
operational on or before October 1, that they are active circuits.84 In provider’s revised count submission, the
2015. In instances where a permit or instances where a permit or license is fee payment must be based on the
license is transferred or assigned after transferred or assigned after October 1, number of subscribers listed initially in
October 1, 2015, responsibility for 2015, responsibility for payment rests Fee Filer. Once the timeframe for
payment rests with the holder of the with the holder of the permit or license revision has passed, the telephone
permit or license as of the fee due date. as of the fee due date. For regulatory fee number counts are final and are the
• International Services: (Submarine purposes, the allocation in FY 2016 will basis upon which CMRS regulatory fees
Cable Systems): Regulatory fees for remain at 87.6 percent for submarine are to be paid. Providers can view their
submarine cable systems are to be paid cable and 12.4 percent for satellite/ final telephone counts online in Fee
on a per cable landing license basis terrestrial facilities.85 Filer. A final CMRS assessment letter
based on circuit capacity as of December will not be mailed out.
31, 2015. In instances where a license is B. Commercial Mobile Radio Service
(CMRS) Cellular and Mobile Services 33. Because some carriers do not file
transferred or assigned after October 1,
2015, responsibility for payment rests Assessments the NRUF report, they may not see their
with the holder of the license as of the 31. The Commission will compile telephone number counts in Fee Filer.
fee due date. For regulatory fee data from the Numbering Resource In these instances, the carriers should
purposes, the allocation in FY 2016 will Utilization Forecast (NRUF) report that compute their fee payment using the
remain at 87.6 percent for submarine is based on ‘‘assigned’’ telephone standard methodology that is currently
cable and 12.4 percent for satellite/ number (subscriber) counts that have in place for CMRS Wireless services
terrestrial facilities. been adjusted for porting to net Type 0 (i.e., compute their telephone number
• International Services: (Terrestrial ports (‘‘in’’ and ‘‘out’’).86 This counts as of December 31, 2015), and
and Satellite Services): Regulatory fees information of telephone numbers submit their fee payment accordingly.
for Terrestrial and Satellite International (subscriber count) will be posted on the Whether a carrier reviews its telephone
Bearer Circuits (IBCs) are to be paid by Commission’s electronic filing and number counts in Fee Filer or not, the
facilities-based common carriers that payment system (Fee Filer) along with Commission reserves the right to audit
have active (used or leased) the carrier’s Operating Company the number of telephone numbers for
international bearer circuits as of Numbers (OCNs). which regulatory fees are paid. In the
December 31, 2015 in any terrestrial or 32. A carrier wishing to revise its event that the Commission determines
satellite transmission facility for the telephone number (subscriber) count that the number of telephone numbers
provision of service to an end user or can do so by accessing Fee Filer and that are paid is inaccurate, the
resale carrier. When calculating the follow the prompts to revise their Commission will bill the carrier for the
number of such active circuits, the telephone number counts. Any revisions difference between what was paid and
facilities-based common carriers must to the telephone number counts should what should have been paid.
include circuits used by themselves or be accompanied by an explanation or
their affiliates. In addition, non- supporting documentation.87 The VI. Additional Tables
TABLE 3—CALCULATION OF FY 2016 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS AND PRO-RATA FEES
[Regulatory fees for the first seven categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are
submitted at the time the application is filed]
FY 2015 Prorated FY Rounded Expected
FY 2016 payment Computed FY
Fee category Years revenue 2016 revenue FY 2016 FY 2016
units 2016 reg. fee
estimate requirement reg. fee revenue
PLMRS (Exclusive Use) .. 2,500 10 546,000 625,938 25 25 625,000
PLMRS (Shared use) In-
cludes Rural Radio
Service (47 CFR part
22) ................................ 31,100 10 3,100,000 3,114,665 10 10 3,110,000
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Microwave ........................ 12,500 10 2,520,000 3,129,688 25 25 3,125,000
December 2015, rather than on a count as of processes to ensure that their calculation methods Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 12259,
December 31, 2015. comply with our rules. 12264, paras. 38–44 (2005).
84 We encourage terrestrial and satellite service 85 We remind facilities-based common carriers to 87 In the supporting documentation, the provider
providers to seek guidance from the International review their reporting processes to ensure that they will need to state a reason for the change, such as
accurately calculate and report IBCs. a purchase or sale of a subsidiary, the date of the
Bureau’s Telecommunications and Analysis 86 See Assessment and Collection of Regulatory transaction, and any other pertinent information
Division to verify their particular IBC reporting
Fees for Fiscal Year 2005, Report and Order and that will help to justify a reason for the change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/9.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35689
TABLE 3—CALCULATION OF FY 2016 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS AND PRO-RATA FEES—Continued
[Regulatory fees for the first seven categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are
submitted at the time the application is filed]
FY 2015 Prorated FY Rounded Expected
FY 2016 payment Computed FY
Fee category Years revenue 2016 revenue FY 2016 FY 2016
units 2016 reg. fee
estimate requirement reg. fee revenue
Marine (Ship) ................... 6,900 10 945,000 1,036,553 15 15 1,035,000
Aviation (Aircraft) ............. 4,700 10 420,000 470,705 10 10 470,000
Marine (Coast) ................. 480 10 171,500 192,288 40 40 192,000
Aviation (Ground) ............. 1,100 10 180,000 220,330 20 20 220,000
AM Class A4 .................... 66 1 281,125 314,451 4,764 4,775 315,150
AM Class B4 .................... 1,535 1 3,499,125 3,893,459 2,536 2,525 3,875,875
AM Class C4 .................... 889 1 1,244,600 1,409,299 1,585 1,575 1,400,175
AM Class D4 .................... 1,492 1 4,103,000 4,607,579 3,088 3,100 4,625,200
FM Classes A, B1 & C3 4 3,122 1 8,613,000 9,652,908 3,092 3,100 9,678,200
FM Classes B, C, C0, C1
& C2 4 ........................... 3,139 1 10,607,625 11,826,839 3,768 3,775 11,849,725
AM Construction Permits 1 15 1 17,110 10,366 691 690 10,350
FM Construction Permits1 179 1 136,500 215,122 1,202 1,200 214,800
Satellite TV ....................... 128 1 200,025 224,336 1,753 1,750 224,000
Digital TV Markets 1–10 .. 139 1 6,274,550 8,446,540 60,766 60,775 8,447,725
Digital TV Markets 11–25 139 1 5,918,400 6,358,412 45,744 45,750 6,359,250
Digital TV Markets 26–50 181 1 5,000,125 5,532,175 30,565 30,575 5534,075
Digital TV Markets 51–
100 ................................ 283 1 4,605,825 4,311,203 15,234 15,225 4,308,675
Digital TV Remaining Mar-
kets ............................... 365 1 1,838,150 1,827,738 5,008 5,000 1,825,000
Digital TV Construction
Permits1 ........................ 3 1 9,700 15,023 5,000 5,000 15,000
LPTV/Translators/Boost-
ers/Class A TV ............. 3,924 1 1,601,600 1,788,098 456 455 1,785,420
CARS Stations ................. 285 1 198,000 221,206 776 775 220,875
Cable TV Systems, in-
cluding IPTV ................. 64,100,000 1 61,920,000 64,196,150 1.0015 1.00 64,100,000
Direct Broadcast Satellite
(DBS) ............................ 34,000,000 1 4,080,000 9,193,770 .2704 .27 9,180,000
Interstate Telecommuni-
cation Service Providers $38,400,000,000 1 128,428,000 141,908,544 0.0036955 0.00370 142,080,000
Toll Free Numbers ........... 36,500,000 1 4,380,000 4,752,018 0.1302 0.13 4,745,000
CMRS Mobile Services
(Cellular/Public Mobile) 360,000,000 1 60,180,000 72,108,276 0.2003 0.20 72,000,000
CMRS Messag. Services 2,300,000 1 208,000 184,000 0.0800 0.080 184,000
BRS 2 ................................ 890 1 565,150 645,250 725 725 645,250
LMDS ............................... 395 1 238,125 286,375 725 725 286,375
Per 64 kbps Int’l Bearer
Circuits Terrestrial
(Common) & Satellite
(Common & Non-Com-
mon) ............................. 22,500,000 1 657,000 770,617 .0342 .03 675,000
Submarine Cable Pro-
viders (see chart in Ap-
pendix B) 3 .................... 39.19 1 4,652,576 5,444,038 138,914 138,925 5,444,471
Earth Stations .................. 3,400 1 1,023,000 1,174,760 346 345 1,173,000
Space Stations (Geo-
stationary) ..................... 95 1 11,438,400 13,174,858 138,683 138,675 13,174,125
Space Stations (Non-Geo-
stationary) ..................... 6 1 792,750 913,068 152,178 152,175 913,050
****** Total Estimated
Revenue to be Col-
lected ..................... ................................ ............ 340,593,961 384,196,740 ........................ ........................ 384,066,766
****** Total Revenue
Requirement .......... ................................ ............ 339,844,000 384,012,497 ........................ ........................ 384,012,497
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Difference .......... ................................ ............ 749,961 184,243 ........................ ........................ 54,269
Notes on Table 3.
1 The AM and FM Construction Permit revenues and the Digital (VHF/UHF) Construction Permit revenues were adjusted, respectively, to set
the regulatory fee to an amount no higher than the lowest licensed fee for that class of service. Reductions in the Digital (VHF/UHF) Construction
Permit revenues were also offset by increases in the revenue totals for various Digital television stations by market size, respectively.
2 MDS/MMDS category was renamed Broadband Radio Service (BRS). See Amendment of Parts 1, 21, 73, 74 and 101 of the Commission’s
Rules to Facilitate the Provision of Fixed and Mobile Broadband Access, Educational and Other Advanced Services in the 2150–2162 and 2500–
2690 MHz Bands, Report & Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 14165, 14169, para. 6 (2004).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/10.svg)
![35690 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
3 The chart at the end of Table 4 lists the submarine cable bearer circuit regulatory fees (common and non-common carrier basis) that resulted
from the adoption of Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 6388 (2008) and Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, Second Report and Order, 24
FCC Rcd 4208 (2009).
4 The fee amounts listed in the column entitled ‘‘Rounded New FY 2016 Regulatory Fee’’ constitute a weighted average media regulatory fee
by class of service. The actual FY 2016 regulatory fees for AM/FM radio station are listed on a grid located at the end of Table 4.
TABLE 4—PROPOSED REGULATORY FEES FY 2016 SCHEDULE OF REGULATORY FEES
[Regulatory fees for the first eight categories below are collected by the Commission in advance to cover the term of the license and are
submitted at the time the application is filed]
Annual
Fee category regulatory fee
(U.S. $’s)
PLMRS (per license) (Exclusive Use) (47 CFR part 90) .............................................................................................................. 25
Microwave (per license) (47 CFR part 101) .................................................................................................................................. 25
Marine (Ship) (per station) (47 CFR part 80) ................................................................................................................................ 15
Marine (Coast) (per license) (47 CFR part 80) ............................................................................................................................. 40
Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under the Land Mobile category) ..................................................................... 10
PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90) .................................................................................................................. 10
Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87) .......................................................................................................................... 10
Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87) ......................................................................................................................... 20
CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90) ................................................................. .20
CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24 and 90) .................................................................................... .08
Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/MDS) (per license) (47 CFR part 27) Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per
call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) ..................................................................................................................................................... 725
725
AM Radio Construction Permits .................................................................................................................................................... 690
FM Radio Construction Permits .................................................................................................................................................... 1,200
Digital TV (47 CFR part 73) VHF and UHF Commercial
Markets 1–10 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 60,775
Markets 11–25 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 45,750
Markets 26–50 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 30,575
Markets 51–100 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15,225
Remaining Markets ................................................................................................................................................................. 5,000
Construction Permits .............................................................................................................................................................. 5,000
Satellite Television Stations (All Markets) ..................................................................................................................................... 1,750
Low Power TV, Class A TV, TV/FM Translators & Boosters (47 CFR part 74) ........................................................................... 455
CARS (47 CFR part 78) ................................................................................................................................................................ 775
Cable Television Systems (per subscriber) (47 CFR part 76), Including IPTV ............................................................................ 1.00
Direct Broadcast Service (DBS) (per subscriber) (as defined by section 602(13) of the Act) ..................................................... .27
Interstate Telecommunication Service Providers (per revenue dollar) ......................................................................................... .00370
Toll Free (per toll free subscriber) (47 CFR section 52.101 (f) of the rules) ................................................................................ .13
Earth Stations (47 CFR part 25) ................................................................................................................................................... 345
Space Stations (per operational station in geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) also includes DBS Service (per operational
station) (47 CFR part 100) ......................................................................................................................................................... 138,675
Space Stations (per operational system in non-geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) ............................................................... 152,175
International Bearer Circuits—Terrestrial/Satellites (per 64KB circuit) ......................................................................................... .03
Submarine Cable Landing Licenses Fee (per cable system) ....................................................................................................... See Table Below
FY 2016 SCHEDULE OF REGULATORY FEES
[Table 4 continued]
FY 2016 RADIO STATION REGULATORY FEES
FM Classes
FM Classes
Population Served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D B, C, C0, C1
A, B1 & C3 & C2
<=25,000 .................................................. $1,100 $795 $690 $760 $1,200 $1,375
25,001–75,000 ......................................... 1,650 1,200 1,025 1,150 1,800 2,050
75,001–150,000 ....................................... 2,200 1,600 1,375 1,525 2,400 2,750
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
150,001–500,000 ..................................... 3,300 2,375 2,075 2,275 3,600 4,125
500,001–1,200,000 .................................. 5,500 3,975 3,450 3,800 6,000 6,875
1,200,001–3,000,00 ................................. 8,250 5,950 5,175 5,700 9,000 10,300
3,000,001–6,000,00 ................................. 11,000 7,950 6,900 7,600 12,000 13,750
>6,000,000 ............................................... 13,750 9,950 8,625 9,500 15,000 17,175
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/11.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules 35691
FY 2016 SCHEDULE OF REGULATORY FEES
[International Bearer Circuits—Submarine Cable (Table 4 continued)]
Submarine Cable Systems Fee amount
(capacity as of December 31, 2015)
< 2.5 Gbps ........................................................................................................................................................................................... $8,675
2.5 Gbps or greater, but less than 5 Gbps ......................................................................................................................................... 17,375
5 Gbps or greater, but less than 10 Gbps .......................................................................................................................................... 34,725
10 Gbps or greater, but less than 20 Gbps ........................................................................................................................................ 69,475
20 Gbps or greater .............................................................................................................................................................................. 138,925
Table 5—Sources of Payment Unit System (CDBS) and Cable Operations payment units cannot yet be estimated
Estimates for FY 2016 and Licensing System (COALS), as well with sufficient accuracy. These include
as reports generated within the an unknown number of waivers and/or
In order to calculate individual Commission such as the Wireless exemptions that may occur in FY 2016
service fees for FY 2016, we adjusted FY Telecommunications Bureau’s and the fact that, in many services, the
2015 payment units for each service to Numbering Resource Utilization number of actual licensees or station
more accurately reflect expected FY Forecast. operators fluctuates from time to time
2016 payment liabilities. We obtained We sought verification for these due to economic, technical, or other
our updated estimates through a variety estimates from multiple sources and, in reasons. When we note, for example,
of means. For example, we used all cases, we compared FY 2016 that our estimated FY 2016 payment
Commission licensee data bases, actual estimates with actual FY 2015 payment units are based on FY 2015 actual
prior year payment records and industry units to ensure that our revised payment units, it does not necessarily
and trade association projections when estimates were reasonable. Where mean that our FY 2016 projection is
available. The databases we consulted appropriate, we adjusted and/or exactly the same number as in FY 2015.
include our Universal Licensing System rounded our final estimates to take into We have either rounded the FY 2016
(ULS), International Bureau Filing consideration the fact that certain number or adjusted it slightly to account
System (IBFS), Consolidated Database variables that impact on the number of for these variables.
Fee category Sources of payment unit estimates
Land Mobile (All), Microwave, Ma- Based on Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) projections of new applications and renewals tak-
rine (Ship & Coast), Aviation (Air- ing into consideration existing Commission licensee data bases. Aviation (Aircraft) and Marine (Ship) es-
craft & Ground), Domestic Public timates have been adjusted to take into consideration the licensing of portions of these services on a
Fixed. voluntary basis.
CMRS Cellular/Mobile Services ...... Based on WTB projection reports, and FY 2015 payment data.
CMRS Messaging Services ............ Based on WTB reports, and FY 2015 payment data.
AM/FM Radio Stations .................... Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units.
Digital TV Stations (Combined Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units.
VHF/UHF units).
AM/FM/TV Construction Permits .... Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units.
LPTV, Translators and Boosters, Based on CDBS data, adjusted for exemptions, and actual FY 2015 payment units.
Class A Television.
BRS (formerly MDS/MMDS) ........... Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2015 payment units.
LMDS .............................................. Based on WTB reports and actual FY 2015 payment units.
Cable Television Relay Service Based on data from Media Bureau’s COALS database and actual FY 2015 payment units.
(CARS) Stations.
Cable Television System Sub- Based on publicly available data sources for estimated subscriber counts and actual FY 2015 payment
scribers, Including IPTV Sub- units.
scribers.
Interstate Telecommunication Serv- Based on FCC Form 499–Q data for the four quarters of calendar year 2015, the Wireline Competition Bu-
ice Providers. reau projected the amount of calendar year 2015 revenue that will be reported on 2016 FCC Form 499–
A worksheets in April 2016.
Earth Stations ................................. Based on International Bureau (IB) licensing data and actual FY 2015 payment units.
Space Stations (GSOs & NGSOs) Based on IB data reports and actual FY 2015 payment units.
International Bearer Circuits ........... Based on IB reports and submissions by licensees, adjusted as necessary.
Submarine Cable Licenses ............. Based on IB license information.
Table 6—Factors, Measurements, and antennas, specific information on each pattern was calculated using techniques
Calculations That Determines Station day tower, including field ratio, phase, and methods specified in sections
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Signal Contours and Associated spacing, and orientation was retrieved, 73.150 and 73.152 of the Commission’s
Population Coverages as well as the theoretical pattern root- rules. Radiation values were calculated
AM Stations mean-square of the radiation in all for each of 360 radials around the
directions in the horizontal plane (RMS) transmitter site. Next, estimated soil
For stations with nondirectional figure (milliVolt per meter (mV/m) @1 conductivity data was retrieved from a
daytime antennas, the theoretical km) for the antenna system. The database representing the information in
radiation was used at all azimuths. For standard, or augmented standard if FCC Figure R3. Using the calculated
stations with directional daytime pertinent, horizontal plane radiation horizontal radiation values, and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/12.svg)
![35696 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
standard under SBA rules is that such television broadcasters are small Pro Radio Database on March 28, 2012,
a business is small if it has 1,500 or entities. about 10,759 (97%) of 11,102
fewer employees. For this industry, 17. We note, however, that in commercial radio stations had revenues
Census Data for 2007 show that there assessing whether a business concern of $7 million or less. Therefore, the
were 1,383 firms that operated for the qualifies as small under the above majority of such entities are small
entire year. Of this total, 1,368 firms had definition, business (control) entities.
fewer than 1,000 employees. Thus affiliations 151 must be included. Our 20. We note, however, that in
under this category and the associated estimate, therefore, likely overstates the assessing whether a business concern
size standard, the Commission estimates number of small entities that might be qualifies as small under the above size
that the majority of wireless affected by our action, because the standard, business affiliations must be
telecommunications carriers (except revenue figure on which it is based does included.157 In addition, to be
satellite) are small entities. Similarly, not include or aggregate revenues from determined to be a ‘‘small business,’’ the
according to internally developed affiliated companies. In addition, an entity may not be dominant in its field
element of the definition of ‘‘small of operation.158 We note that it is
Commission’s Industry Analysis
business’’ is that the entity not be difficult at times to assess these criteria
Division of the Wireline Competition
dominant in its field of operation. We in the context of media entities, and our
Bureau data, 413 carriers reported that
are unable at this time to define or estimate of small businesses may
they were engaged in the provision of quantify the criteria that would therefore be over-inclusive.
wireless telephony, including cellular establish whether a specific television 21. Cable Television and other
service, Personal Communications station is dominant in its field of Subscription Programming.159 Since
Service (PCS), and Specialized Mobile operation. Accordingly, the estimate of 2007, these services have been defined
Radio (SMR) services.145 Of this total, small businesses to which rules may within the broad economic census
an estimated 261 have 1,500 or fewer apply does not exclude any television category of Wired Telecommunications
employees.146 Consequently, the station from the definition of a small Carriers. That category is defined as
Commission estimates that business on this basis and is therefore follows: ‘‘This industry comprises
approximately half of these firms can be possibly over-inclusive to that extent. establishments primarily engaged in
considered small. Thus, using available 18. In addition, the Commission has operating and/or providing access to
data, we estimate that the majority of estimated the number of licensed
wireless firms can be considered small noncommercial educational (NCE) 157 ‘‘Concerns and entities are affiliates of each
and may be affected by rules adopted television stations to be 396.152 These other when one controls or has the power to control
the other, or a third party or parties controls or has
pursuant to this NPRM. stations are non-profit, and therefore the power to control both. It does not matter
16. Television Broadcasting. This considered to be small entities.153 There whether control is exercised, so long as the power
Economic Census category ‘‘comprises are also 2,528 low power television to control exists.’’ 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1) (an SBA
stations, including Class A stations regulation).
establishments primarily engaged in 158 13 CFR 121.102(b) (an SBA regulation).
broadcasting images together with (LPTV).154 Given the nature of these 159 In 2014, ‘‘Cable and Other Subscription
services, we will presume that all LPTV Programming,’’ NAICS Code 515210, replaced a
sound. These establishments operate
licensees qualify as small entities under prior category, now obsolete, which was called
television broadcasting studios and
the above SBA small business size ‘‘Cable and Other Program Distribution.’’ Cable and
facilities for the programming and Other Program Distribution, prior to 2014, were
standard.
transmission of programs to the 19. Radio Broadcasting. This placed under NAICS Code 517110, Wired
public.’’ 147 The SBA has created the Telecommunications Carriers. Wired
Economic Census category ‘‘comprises Telecommunications Carriers is still a current and
following small business size standard establishments primarily engaged in valid NAICS Code Category. Because of the
for Television Broadcasting firms: those broadcasting aural programs by radio to similarity between ‘‘Cable and Other Subscription
having $14 million or less in annual Programming’’ and ‘‘Cable and other Program
the public. Programming may originate Distribution,’’ we will, in this proceeding, continue
receipts.148 The Commission has in their own studio, from an affiliated to use Wired Telecommunications Carrier data
estimated the number of licensed network, or from external sources. 155 based on the U.S. Census. The alternative of using
commercial television stations to be The SBA has established a small data gathered under Cable and Other Subscription
1,387.149 In addition, according to Programming (NAICS Code 515210) is unavailable
business size standard for this category, to us for two reasons. First, the size standard
Commission staff review of the BIA which is: Such firms having $7 million established by the SBA for Cable and Other
Advisory Services, LLC’s Media Access or less in annual receipts.156 According Subscription Programming is annual receipts of
Pro Television Database on March 28, to Commission staff review of BIA $38.5 million or less. Thus to use the annual
2012, about 950 of an estimated 1,300 receipts size standard would require the
Advisory Services, LLC’s Media Access Commission either to switch from existing
commercial television stations (or employee based size standard of 1,500 employees
approximately 73 percent) had revenues 151 ‘‘[Business concerns] are affiliates of each or less for Wired Telecommunications Carriers, or
of $14 million or less.150 We therefore other when one concern controls or has the power else would require the use of two size standards.
to control the other or a third party or parties No official approval of either option has been
estimate that the majority of commercial granted by the Commission as of the time of the
controls or has to power to control both.’’ 13 CFR
21.103(a)(1). release of the Notice. Second, the data available
145 Trends in Telephone Service, at Table 5.3. 152 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station under the size standard of $38.5 million dollars or
146 Id. Totals as of December 31, 2011,’’ dated January 6, less is not applicable at this time, because the only
147 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, 2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ currently available U.S. Census data for annual
Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. receipts of all businesses operating in the NAICS
‘‘515120 Television Broadcasting’’ (partial
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Code category of 515210 (Cable and other
definition); http://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ 153 See generally 5 U.S.C. 601(4), (6).
Subscription Programming) consists only of total
ND515120.HTM#N515120. 154 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station
148 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120 (updated
receipts for all businesses operating in this category
Totals as of December 31, 2011,’’ dated January 6, in 2007 and of total annual receipts for all
for inflation in 2010). 2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ businesses operatin6 in this category in 2012.
149 See FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. Hence the data do not provide any basis for
Totals as of December 31, 2011,’’ dated January 6, 155 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
determining, for either year, how many businesses
2012; http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/ ‘‘515112 Radio Stations’’; http://www.census.gov/ were small because they had annual receipts of
Daily_Business/2012/db0106/DOC-311837A1.pdf. naics/2007/def/ND515112.HTM#N515112. $38.5 million or less. http://factfinder.census.gov/
150 We recognize that BIA’s estimate differs 156 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515112 (updated faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml
slightly from the FCC total given supra. for inflation in 2010). ?pid=ECN_2012_US_51I2&prodType=table.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/17.svg)
![35698 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Proposed Rules
annual receipts of $32.5 million or provided financial relief to smaller (Alces alces andersoni) as an
less.178 For this category, census data for entities. endangered or threatened distinct
2007 show that there were 2,383 firms population segment (DPS), presents
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
that operated for the entire year. Of substantial scientific or commercial
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
these firms, a total of 2,346 had gross information indicating that the
Rules
annual receipts of less than $25 petitioned action may be warranted.
million.179 Thus, a majority of ‘‘All 29. None. Therefore, with the publication of this
Other Telecommunications’’ firms VII. Ordering Clauses document, we are initiating a review of
potentially affected by the proposals in the status of this population to
the NPRM can be considered small. 30. Accordingly, it is ordered that, determine if the petitioned action is
pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 9, and warranted. To ensure that this status
D. Description of Projected Reporting, 303(r) of the Communications Act of review is comprehensive, we are
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), requesting scientific and commercial
Requirements 154(j), 159, and 303(r), this Notice of data and other information regarding
26. This NPRM does not propose any Proposed Rulemaking is hereby this subspecies. Based on the status
changes to the Commission’s current adopted. review, we will issue a 12-month
information collection, reporting, 31. It is further ordered that the finding on the petition, which will
recordkeeping, or compliance Commission’s Consumer and address whether the petitioned action is
requirements. Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference warranted, as provided in section
Information Center, shall send a copy of 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and including the Initial Regulatory DATES: To allow us adequate time to
Significant Alternatives Considered Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief conduct the status review, we request
Counsel for Advocacy of the U.S. Small that we receive information no later
27. The RFA requires an agency to
Business Administration. than August 2, 2016. Information
describe any significant alternatives that
submitted electronically using the
it has considered in reaching its Federal Communications Commission. Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
approach, which may include the Marlene H. Dortch, ADDRESSES, below) must be received by
following four alternatives, among Secretary. 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
others: (1) The establishment of
[FR Doc. 2016–13087 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am] date.
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into BILLING CODE 6712–01–P ADDRESSES: Not-substantial petition
account the resources available to small finding: The not-substantial petition
entities; (2) the clarification, finding for the golden-cheeked warbler
consolidation, or simplification of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR is available on http://
compliance or reporting requirements www.regulations.gov under the docket
under the rule for small entities; (3) the Fish and Wildlife Service number FWS–R2–ES–2016–0062.
use of performance, rather than design, Supporting information in preparing
standards; and (4) an exemption from 50 CFR Part 17 this finding is available for public
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, [Docket Nos. FWS–R3–ES–2016–0061; inspection, by appointment, during
for small entities.180 FWS–R2–ES–2016–0062] 4500030115 normal business hours by contacting the
28. This NPRM seeks comment on the appropriate person, as specified under
Commission’s regulatory fee collection Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
for Fiscal Year 2016, as required by and Plants; 90-Day Findings on Two Status review: You may submit
Congress each year. Specifically, we ask Petitions information on the U.S. population of
for comments each year in the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, northwestern moose (Alces alces
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis on how Interior. andersoni) by one of the following
to minimize adverse economic impact, methods:
ACTION: Notice of petition findings and
imposed by our proposed rules, on (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
small entities. The regulatory fees initiation of status review.
eRulemaking Portal: http://
proposed in this NPRM do not include SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
any new fee categories. However, the Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90- enter the docket number: FWS–R3–ES–
proposal in FY 2016 to revise the day findings on two petitions to list or 2016–0061. You may submit
broadcasters’ fee grid to include a delist wildlife under the Endangered information by clicking on ‘‘Comment
threshold ‘‘greater than 6,000,000’’, and Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Now!’’ If your information will fit in the
a change in the television fee amounts Based on our review, we find that one provided comment box, please use this
so that large markets pay a higher petition, which requests that we remove feature of http://www.regulations.gov, as
proportional fee than small and the golden-cheeked warbler from the it is most compatible with our
medium-sized markets, will provide Federal List of Endangered and information review procedures. If you
some relief to small broadcast and Threatened Wildlife, does not present attach your information as a separate
television entities. The increase in the substantial scientific or commercial document, our preferred file format is
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
de minimis amount to $500 information indicating that the Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple
implemented in FY 2015 has already petitioned action may be warranted, and comments (such as form letters), our
we are not initiating a status review in preferred format is a spreadsheet in
178 13 CFR 121.201; NAICs Code 517919. response to this petition. We refer to Microsoft Excel.
179 http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/
this as a ‘‘not-substantial petition (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
tableservices.jasf/pages/
productview.xhtml?pid+ECN_2007_ finding.’’ We also find that the other or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
US.51SSSZ4&prodType=table. petition, which requests that we list the Processing, Attn: FWS–R3–ES–2016–
180 5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(c)(4). U.S. population of northwestern moose 0061; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:06 Jun 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM 03JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_35787/page/19.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:29:46
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:29:46
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Submit comments on or before June 20, 2016, and reply comments on or before July 5, 2016. | |
| Contact | Roland Helvajian, Office of Managing Director at (202) 418-0444. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 35680 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR