81 FR 36803 - Completeness Findings for 110(a)(2)(C) State Implementation Plan Pertaining to the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 110 (June 8, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 110 (June 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 36803-36805 | |
| FR Document | 2016-13491 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 36803-36805] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-13491] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0300; FRL-9947-35-Region 9] Completeness Findings for 110(a)(2)(C) State Implementation Plan Pertaining to the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) NAAQS; California; El Dorado County Air Quality Management District and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making a finding that the State of California has made a complete New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission for the El Dorado County Air Quality Management District (EDCAQMD) to address the permitting of emissions of particulate matter 2.5 micrometers ([mu]m) in diameter and smaller (PM2.5 ) from major sources in areas designated nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, the EPA is making a finding that the State of California has not made the necessary NSR SIP submission for the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) to address the permitting of PM2.5 emissions from major sources in areas designated nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, as required by the EPA no later than December 31, 2014. The EPA is making these findings in accordance with section 110 and part D of Title I of the CAA. DATES: The effective date of this rule is July 8, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, Air Division (Air-3), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; telephone (415) 972-3534; email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. The EPA has determined that there is good cause for making this rule final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because no significant EPA judgment is involved in making a finding of failure to submit SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by the CAA, where states have made no submissions to meet the requirement by the statutory date. No additional fact gathering is necessary. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. The EPA finds this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA. Table of Contents I. Background and Overview A. Relevant PM2.5 NAAQS B. Revisions to the NSR Program To Implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS II. This Action A. Completeness Determination B. Finding of Failure To Submit III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background and Overview A. Relevant PM2.5 NAAQS On October 17, 2006, the EPA promulgated revisions to the NAAQS for PM2.5 with an effective date of December 18, 2006 (71 FR 61144). With these revisions, the EPA lowered the 24-hour NAAQS for PM2.5 from 65 [mu]g/m\3\ to 35 [mu]g/m\3\, and retained the existing annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 [mu]g/m\3\. The EPA promulgated designations for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS that became effective on December 14, 2009, which designated certain areas within the jurisdiction of EDCAQMD and YSAQMD as nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (74 FR 58688, Nov. 13, 2009). B. Revisions to the NSR Program To Implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS To implement the PM2.5 NAAQS for NSR purposes, the EPA issued a final rule that established the NSR permitting requirements for PM2.5 , entitled Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5), on May 16, 2008 (73 FR 28321). Among other things, the final rule [[Page 36804]] amended the NSR regulations to establish the minimum elements for state and local agencies implementing a nonattainment NSR program for major sources for the PM2.5 NAAQS. The final rule required states to submit SIP revisions to address these requirements to the EPA by July 15, 2011. In 2013, certain provisions of EPA's May 16, 2008 final rule were affected by a judicial decision, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013), in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit determined that the EPA must regulate PM2.5 in nonattainment areas under the particulate-matter- specific provisions of subpart 4 of part D of Title I of the CAA. As a partial response to this judicial decision, the EPA finalized a rulemaking on June 2, 2014 which, among other things, set a new date of December 31, 2014 for states to submit SIP revisions to address applicable nonattainment SIP requirements for PM2.5 , pursuant to subpart 4 of part D of Title I of the CAA. 79 FR 31566. Accordingly, states are required to have submitted all elements of a nonattainment NSR SIP for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS to the EPA by no later than December 31, 2014. II. This Action A. Completeness Determination The EPA is making a finding that the State of California submitted an NSR SIP revision for EDCAQMD to address NSR requirements for major sources in nonattainment areas for purposes of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS on March 21, 2016, which the EPA determined met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, on March 30, 2016. This completeness finding establishes a 12-month deadline for EPA to take action upon such SIP submission in accordance with section 110(k). B. Finding of Failure To Submit The EPA is making a finding that, as of the date of signature for this document, the State of California has failed to submit the required NSR program SIP revision for YSAQMD to address NSR requirements for major sources in nonattainment areas for purposes of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS as required by December 31, 2014. This action will be effective on July 8, 2016. If the EPA finds that a state has failed to make a required SIP submission or that a submitted SIP submission is incomplete for elements of a part D, Title I plan for nonattainment areas as required under section 110(a)(2)(I), then CAA section 179(a) establishes specific consequences, including the imposition of mandatory sanctions for the affected area. Additionally, such a finding triggers an obligation under CAA section 110(c) for the EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) no later than 2 years from the effective date of such finding of failure to submit, if the affected state has not submitted, and the EPA has not approved, the required SIP submission before that date. In this case, if the EPA has not affirmatively determined that the State of California has made the required complete NSR program SIP submission for YSAQMD to address NSR requirements for major sources in nonattainment areas for purposes of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS within 18 months of the effective date of this rulemaking, then, pursuant to CAA section 179(a) and (b) and 40 CFR 52.31, the offset sanction identified in CAA section 179(b)(2) will apply in the affected nonattainment areas. In addition, if the EPA has not affirmatively determined that the State has made such a complete submission within 6 months after the offset sanction is imposed, then the highway funding sanction will apply in the affected nonattainment areas, in accordance with CAA section 179(b)(1) and 40 CFR 52.31. The sanctions will not take effect, if, within 18 months after the effective date of this finding of failure to submit, the EPA finds that the State has made a complete SIP submission addressing the deficiency for which the finding was made. Additionally, if the State makes the required SIP submission and the EPA takes final action to approve the submission within 2 years of the effective date of this finding, the EPA is not required to promulgate a FIP for the affected nonattainment areas per CAA section 110(c). III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and was, therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the PRA. This final rule does not establish any new information collection requirement apart from what is already required by law. This rule relates to the requirement in the CAA for states to submit nonattainment NSR SIPs for major sources to satisfy certain NSR requirements under the CAA for the PM2.5 NAAQS. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action relates to the requirement in the CAA for states to submit nonattainment NSR SIPs for major sources to satisfy certain NSR requirements of the CAA for the PM2.5 NAAQS. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This rule addresses the requirement in the CAA for states to submit nonattainment NSR SIPs for major sources to satisfy certain NSR requirements under the CAA for the PM2.5 NAAQS. No tribe is subject to this requirement. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it provides EPA's finding that the State of California has failed to make a submission for YSAQMD that is required under the CAA to implement the PM2.5 NAAQS, and does not directly or disproportionately affect children. [[Page 36805]] H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income, or indigenous populations. In finding that the State of California has failed to submit a SIP to address certain basic permitting requirements for the PM2.5 NAAQS, for YSAQMD, this action does not directly affect the level of protection provided for human health or the environment. K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). L. Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 8, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review must be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 26, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2016-13491 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 36803
evidence obtained on the person’s (5) From subsection (f) of 5 U.S.C. 972–3534; email yannayon.laura@
activities; about the identity of 552a because these systems are exempt epa.gov.
confidential sources, witnesses, and law from the access and amendment SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
enforcement personnel; and about provisions of subsection (d) of 5 U.S.C. 553 of the Administrative Procedures
information that may enable the person 552a, pursuant to subsection (k)(2) of Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that,
to avoid being detected or apprehended. the Privacy Act. when an agency for good cause finds
These factors present a serious Dated: May 29, 2016. that notice and public procedure are
impediment to effective law David S. Ferriero, impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
enforcement when they prevent to the public interest, the agency may
Archivist of the United States.
investigators from successfully issue a rule without providing notice
[FR Doc. 2016–13599 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
completing the investigation, endanger and an opportunity for public comment.
the physical safety of confidential BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
The EPA has determined that there is
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement good cause for making this rule final
personnel, or lead to improperly without prior proposal and opportunity
influencing witnesses, destroying ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION for comment because no significant EPA
evidence, or fabricating testimony. In AGENCY judgment is involved in making a
addition, granting access to such records finding of failure to submit SIPs, or
could disclose security-sensitive or 40 CFR Part 52 elements of SIPs, required by the CAA,
confidential business information or where states have made no submissions
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0300; FRL–9947–35–
information that would constitute an to meet the requirement by the statutory
Region 9]
unwarranted invasion of the personal date. No additional fact gathering is
privacy of third parties. Amending these Completeness Findings for 110(a)(2)(C) necessary. Thus, notice and public
records could allow the subject to avoid State Implementation Plan Pertaining procedure are unnecessary. The EPA
being detected or apprehended and to the Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) finds this constitutes good cause under
interfere with ongoing investigations NAAQS; California; El Dorado County 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
and law enforcement activities. Air Quality Management District and Throughout this document wherever
(3) From subsection (e)(1) of 5 U.S.C. Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
552a because applying this provision District the EPA.
could impair investigations and
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Table of Contents
interfere with the law enforcement
responsibilities of the OIG, the Insider Agency (EPA). I. Background and Overview
Threat Office, or another agency for the ACTION: Final rule. A. Relevant PM2.5 NAAQS
following reasons: B. Revisions to the NSR Program To
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
(i) It is not possible to detect II. This Action
relevance or need for specific Agency (EPA) is making a finding that
A. Completeness Determination
information in the early stages of an the State of California has made a B. Finding of Failure To Submit
investigation, case, or matter. After the complete New Source Review (NSR) III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
investigators evaluate the information, State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submission for the El Dorado County I. Background and Overview
they may establish its relevance and
need. Air Quality Management District A. Relevant PM2.5 NAAQS
(ii) During an investigation, the (EDCAQMD) to address the permitting
of emissions of particulate matter 2.5 On October 17, 2006, the EPA
investigating office may obtain promulgated revisions to the NAAQS
information about other actual or micrometers (mm) in diameter and
smaller (PM2.5) from major sources in for PM2.5 with an effective date of
potential criminal, civil, or December 18, 2006 (71 FR 61144). With
administrative violations, including areas designated nonattainment for the
2006 PM2.5 National Ambient Air these revisions, the EPA lowered the 24-
those outside the scope of its hour NAAQS for PM2.5 from 65 mg/m3
jurisdiction. The office should retain Quality Standards (NAAQS), as required
by the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, to 35 mg/m3, and retained the existing
this information, as it may help annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 mg/m3. The
establish patterns of inappropriate the EPA is making a finding that the
State of California has not made the EPA promulgated designations for the
activity, and can provide valuable leads 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS that became
for Federal and other law enforcement necessary NSR SIP submission for the
Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management effective on December 14, 2009, which
agencies. designated certain areas within the
(iii) When interviewing individuals or District (YSAQMD) to address the
permitting of PM2.5 emissions from jurisdiction of EDCAQMD and
obtaining other forms of evidence YSAQMD as nonattainment for the 2006
during an investigation, the investigator major sources in areas designated
nonattainment for the 2006 PM2.5 PM2.5 NAAQS (74 FR 58688, Nov. 13,
may receive information that relates to 2009).
matters incidental to the primary NAAQS, as required by the EPA no later
purpose of the investigation but which than December 31, 2014. The EPA is B. Revisions to the NSR Program To
may also relate to matters under the making these findings in accordance Implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
investigative jurisdiction of another with section 110 and part D of Title I of To implement the PM2.5 NAAQS for
office or agency. The investigator cannot the CAA. NSR purposes, the EPA issued a final
readily segregate such information. DATES: The effective date of this rule is rule that established the NSR permitting
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(4) From subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H) July 8, 2016. requirements for PM2.5, entitled
of 5 U.S.C. 552a because these systems FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Implementation of the New Source
are exempt from the access and Laura Yannayon, Air Division (Air–3), Review (NSR) Program for Particulate
amendment provisions of subsection Environmental Protection Agency, Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(d), pursuant to subsection (k)(2) of the Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San (PM2.5), on May 16, 2008 (73 FR 28321).
Privacy Act. Francisco, CA 94105; telephone (415) Among other things, the final rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:36 Jun 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM 08JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_36913/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 36805
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, COMMISSION 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
Distribution or Use (TTY).
47 CFR Part 1
This action is not subject to Executive Synopsis
Order 13211, because it is not a [GN Docket No. 12–268, WT Docket Nos.
14–70, 05–211, RM–11395; FCC 15–80] As required by the Paperwork
significant regulatory action under Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507),
Executive Order 12866. the FCC is notifying the public that it
Updating Competitive Bidding Rules
I. National Technology Transfer and received OMB approval on May 23,
Advancement Act AGENCY: Federal Communications 2016, for the information collection
Commission. requirements contained in the
This rulemaking does not involve ACTION: Final rule; announcement of information collection 3060–1092.
technical standards. effective date. Under 5 CFR 1320, an agency may not
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal conduct or sponsor a collection of
Actions To Address Environmental SUMMARY: In this document, the information unless it displays a current,
Justice in Minority Populations and Commission announces that the Office valid OMB Control Number. No person
Low-Income Populations of Management and Budget (OMB) shall be subject to any penalty for failing
approved on May 23, 2016, an to comply with a collection of
The EPA believes the human health or information collection for FCC Form information subject to the Paperwork
environmental risk addressed by this 611–T, FCC Wireless Reduction Act that does not display a
action will not have potential Telecommunications Bureau Annual current, valid OMB Control Number.
disproportionately high and adverse Report Related to Eligibility for The OMB Control Number is 3060–
human health or environmental effects Designated Entity Benefits and 47 CFR 1092. The foregoing document is
on minority, low-income, or indigenous 1.2110(n) contained in the Report and required by the Paperwork Reduction
populations. In finding that the State of Order, FCC 15–80. This document is Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13,
California has failed to submit a SIP to consistent with the Report and Order, October 1, 1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507.
address certain basic permitting which stated that the Commission The total annual reporting burdens
requirements for the PM2.5 NAAQS, for would publish a document in the and costs for the respondents are as
YSAQMD, this action does not directly Federal Register announcing OMB follows:
affect the level of protection provided approval and the effective date of the OMB Control Number: 3060–1092.
for human health or the environment. requirements. OMB Approval Date: May 23, 2016.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) DATES: 47 CFR 1.2110(n), published at OMB Expiration Date: January 31,
80 FR 56764 on September 18, 2015 and 2017.
This action is subject to the CRA, and Title: Interim Procedures for Filing
the EPA will submit a rule report to revised FCC Form 611–T, are effective
on July 8, 2016. Applicants Seeking Approval for
each House of the Congress and to the Designated Entity Reportable Eligibility
Comptroller General of the United FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information contact Cathy Events and Annual Reports.
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ Form Number: FCC Form 611–T and
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Williams, Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, (202)
418–2918. FCC Form 609–T (only Form 611–T was
L. Judicial Review revised with this submission to OMB).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Respondents: Business or other for-
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, document announces that, on May 23, profit entities; Not for Profit Institutions;
petitions for judicial review of this 2016, OMB approved the information and State, Local or Tribal Government.
action must be filed in the United States collection requirements for FCC Form Number of Respondents and
Court of Appeals for the appropriate 611–T, FCC Wireless Responses: 1,100 respondents and 2,750
circuit by August 8, 2016. Filing a Telecommunication Bureau Annual responses.
petition for reconsideration by the Report Related to Eligibility for Estimated Hours per Response: 0.50
Administrator of this final rule does not Designated Entity Benefits and 47 CFR to 6 hours.
affect the finality of this action for the 1.2110(n) contained in the Report and Frequency of Response: On occasion
purposes of judicial review nor does it Order, FCC 15–80. The OMB Control and annual reporting requirements.
extend the time within which a petition Number is 3060–1092. If you have any Total Annual Burden: 7,288 hours.
for judicial review must be filed, and comments on the burden estimates Total Annual Costs: 2,223,375.
shall not postpone the effectiveness of listed below, or how the Commission Obligation to Respond: Required to
such rule or action. can improve the collections and reduce obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
any burdens caused thereby, please authority for this information collection
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
contact Cathy Williams, Federal is contained in 47 U.S.C. 4(i), 308(b),
Environmental protection, Air Communications Commission, Room 1– 309(j)(3) and 309(j)(4).
pollution control, Incorporation by C823, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
reference, Intergovernmental relations, DC 20554. Please include the OMB There is no need for confidentiality
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Control Number, 3060–1092, in your required with this collection of
Reporting and recordkeeping correspondence. The Commission will information.
requirements, Sulfur oxides. also accept your comments via the Privacy Impact Assessment: No
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Internet if you send them to PRA@ impact(s).
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
fcc.gov. Needs and Uses: On July 20, 2015, the
Dated: May 26, 2016. To request materials in accessible Commission released the Part 1 R&O in
Alexis Strauss, formats for people with disabilities which it updated many of its Part 1
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. (Braille, large print, electronic files, competitive bidding rules (See Updating
[FR Doc. 2016–13491 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am] audio format), send an email to fcc504@ Part 1 Competitive Bidding Rules;
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Expanding the Economic and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:36 Jun 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM 08JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_36913/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-08 03:10:13
Document Modified: 2016-06-08 03:10:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | The effective date of this rule is July 8, 2016. | |
| Contact | Laura Yannayon, Air Division (Air-3), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; telephone (415) 972-3534; email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 36803 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR