81_FR_36980 81 FR 36870 - Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

81 FR 36870 - Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 110 (June 8, 2016)

Page Range36870-36871
FR Document2016-13578

On February 2, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') initiated the fourth five-year (``sunset'') review of the antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-steel cooking ware (``POS cookware'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested parties, as well as a lack of response from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the antidumping duty order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36870-36871]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13578]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-506]


Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On February 2, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') initiated the fourth five-year (``sunset'') review of 
the antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-steel cooking ware (``POS 
cookware'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ 
On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate 
substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested 
parties, as well as a lack of response from respondent interested 
parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the 
antidumping duty order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the 
Department finds that revocation of the Order would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the 
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 45945 
(August 3, 2015) (``Initiation Notice'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Devine, Enforcement and 
Compliance, Office V, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0238.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On February 2, 2016, the Department initiated the fourth sunset 
review of the Order pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``Act'').\2\ On February 16, 2016, the Department 
received a timely notice of intent to participate in the sunset review 
on behalf of Columbian Home Products LLC (formerly General Housewares 
Corporation) (``Columbian''), pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ 
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii)(A), Columbian is an 
interested party under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of 
the domestic like product. On March 3, 2016, Columbian filed a 
substantive response in the sunset review within the 30-day deadline, 
as specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ The Department did not 
receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party in 
the sunset review. On April 4, 2016, the Department made its adequacy 
determination in the sunset review finding that the Department did not 
receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 45945 
(August 3, 2015) (``Sunset Initiation'').
    \3\ See Letter to the Secretary from Columbian, ``Five-Year 
Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Porcelain-On-Steel 
Cooking Ware From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Intent 
to Participate in Sunset Review,'' (February 16, 2016).
    \4\ See Letter to the Secretary from Columbian, ``Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Porcelain-On-Steel 
Cooking Ware From The People's Republic Of China: Columbian's 
Response To Notice Of Initiation,'' (March 3, 2016) (``Substantive 
Response'').
    \5\ See Letter to the ITC from the Department, ``Sunset Reviews 
Initiated on February 2, 2016,'' (April 4, 2016); specifically, 
based on the lack of an adequate response in the sunset review from 
any respondent party, the Department is conducting an expedited 
(120-day) sunset review consistent with section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). See also Procedures for 
Conducting Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516, 13519 (March 20, 1998) (the 
Department normally will conduct an expedited sunset review where 
respondent interested parties provide an inadequate response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The subject merchandise is porcelain-on-steel cooking ware, 
including tea kettles, which do not have self-contained electric 
heating elements. All of the foregoing are constructed of steel and are 
enameled or glazed with vitreous glasses. The merchandise is currently 
classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') 
subheading 7323.94.00.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 7534 (February 10, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this review are addressed in the ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware 
from the People's Republic of China'' (``Issues and Decision 
Memorandum'') from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently 
with and hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation 
or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to 
prevail if the Order were revoked. Parties may find a complete 
discussion of all issues raised in the review and the corresponding 
recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System 
(``ACCESS''). Access to ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit 
room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the Web at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and 
Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on POS cookware from the 
PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at 
weighted-average margins up to 66.65 percent.

Notice Regarding Administrative Protective Order (``APO'')

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary

[[Page 36871]]

information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 
Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: June 1, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-13578 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                  36870                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices

                                                  description of the scope of the investigation             ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this                kettles, which do not have self-
                                                  is dispositive.                                           notice.                                                    contained electric heating elements. All
                                                  Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed                      DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2016.                       of the foregoing are constructed of steel
                                                  in the Preliminary Decision                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                           and are enameled or glazed with
                                                  Memorandum                                                Andrew Devine, Enforcement and                             vitreous glasses. The merchandise is
                                                                                                            Compliance, Office V, International                        currently classifiable under the
                                                  I. Summary                                                                                                           Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’)
                                                  II. Background                                            Trade Administration, U.S. Department
                                                                                                            of Commerce, 14th Street and                               subheading 7323.94.00.6
                                                  III. Period of Investigation
                                                  IV. Postponement of Final Determination and               Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                       Analysis of Comments Received
                                                        Extension of Provisional Measures                   DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0238.                         All issues raised in this review are
                                                  V. Scope Comments                                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  VI. Use of Facts Available With Adverse                                                                              addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                        Inferences                                          Background                                                 Memorandum for the Final Results of
                                                     A. Application of Facts Available                                                                                 the Expedited Sunset Review of the
                                                                                                               On February 2, 2016, the Department                     Antidumping Duty Order on Porcelain-
                                                     B. Use of Adverse Inference
                                                     C. Selection of the Adverse Facts Available            initiated the fourth sunset review of the                  on-Steel Cooking Ware from the
                                                        Rate                                                Order pursuant to section 751(c) of the                    People’s Republic of China’’ (‘‘Issues
                                                     D. Corroboration of Secondary Information              Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’).2                 and Decision Memorandum’’) from
                                                  VII. All-Others Rate                                      On February 16, 2016, the Department                       Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
                                                  VIII. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates for               received a timely notice of intent to                      Secretary, Antidumping and
                                                        Export Subsidies in Companion                       participate in the sunset review on                        Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
                                                        Countervailing Duty Investigation                   behalf of Columbian Home Products
                                                  IX. Verification                                                                                                     Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
                                                                                                            LLC (formerly General Housewares                           Enforcement and Compliance, dated
                                                  X. Conclusion                                             Corporation) (‘‘Columbian’’), pursuant                     concurrently with and hereby adopted
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–13481 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]                to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 In                            by this notice. The issues discussed in
                                                  BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                    accordance with 19 CFR                                     the Issues and Decision Memorandum
                                                                                                            351.218(d)(1)(ii)(A), Columbian is an                      include the likelihood of continuation
                                                                                                            interested party under section 771(9)(C)                   or recurrence of dumping and the
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                    of the Act as a producer of the domestic                   magnitude of the margins likely to
                                                                                                            like product. On March 3, 2016,                            prevail if the Order were revoked.
                                                  International Trade Administration
                                                                                                            Columbian filed a substantive response                     Parties may find a complete discussion
                                                                                                            in the sunset review within the 30-day                     of all issues raised in the review and the
                                                  [A–570–506]                                               deadline, as specified in 19 CFR                           corresponding recommendations in this
                                                                                                            351.218(d)(3)(i).4 The Department did                      public memorandum which is on file
                                                  Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From                      not receive a substantive response from
                                                  the People’s Republic of China: Final                                                                                electronically via Enforcement and
                                                                                                            any respondent interested party in the                     Compliance’s Antidumping and
                                                  Results of Expedited Sunset Review of                     sunset review. On April 4, 2016, the
                                                  the Antidumping Duty Order                                                                                           Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                                                                                            Department made its adequacy                               Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
                                                                                                            determination in the sunset review                         Access to ACCESS is available in the
                                                  AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                                                                            finding that the Department did not                        Central Records Unit room B8024 of the
                                                  International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                            receive a substantive response from any                    main Commerce building. In addition, a
                                                  Department of Commerce.
                                                                                                            respondent interested party.5                              complete version of the Issues and
                                                  SUMMARY:   On February 2, 2016, the                                                                                  Decision Memorandum can be accessed
                                                                                                            Scope of the Order
                                                  Department of Commerce (the                                                                                          directly on the Web at http://trade.gov/
                                                  ‘‘Department’’) initiated the fourth five-                  The subject merchandise is porcelain-                    enforcement. The signed Issues and
                                                  year (‘‘sunset’’) review of the                           on-steel cooking ware, including tea                       Decision Memorandum and the
                                                  antidumping duty order on porcelain-                                                                                 electronic version of the Issues and
                                                                                                               2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
                                                  on-steel cooking ware (‘‘POS                                                                                         Decision Memorandum are identical in
                                                                                                            FR 45945 (August 3, 2015) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’).
                                                  cookware’’) from the People’s Republic                       3 See Letter to the Secretary from Columbian,
                                                                                                                                                                       content.
                                                  of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section                    ‘‘Five-Year Sunset Review of Antidumping Duty              Final Results of Review
                                                  751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                      Order on Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware From
                                                  amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 On the basis of                   the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Intent to          Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3)
                                                  a notice of intent to participate and an                  Participate in Sunset Review,’’ (February 16, 2016).       of the Act, we determine that revocation
                                                                                                               4 See Letter to the Secretary from Columbian,
                                                  adequate substantive response filed on                                                                               of the antidumping duty order on POS
                                                                                                            ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping
                                                  behalf of the domestic interested parties,                Duty Order On Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware
                                                                                                                                                                       cookware from the PRC would likely
                                                  as well as a lack of response from                        From The People’s Republic Of China: Columbian’s           lead to continuation or recurrence of
                                                  respondent interested parties, the                        Response To Notice Of Initiation,’’ (March 3, 2016)        dumping at weighted-average margins
                                                                                                            (‘‘Substantive Response’’).                                up to 66.65 percent.
                                                  Department conducted an expedited                            5 See Letter to the ITC from the Department,
                                                  sunset review of the antidumping duty                     ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on February 2, 2016,’’          Notice Regarding Administrative
                                                  order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of                (April 4, 2016); specifically, based on the lack of an     Protective Order (‘‘APO’’)
                                                  the Act and 19 CFR                                        adequate response in the sunset review from any
                                                                                                            respondent party, the Department is conducting an            This notice also serves as the only
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this
                                                  sunset review, the Department finds that
                                                                                                            expedited (120-day) sunset review consistent with          reminder to parties subject to an APO of
                                                                                                            section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR                 their responsibility concerning the
                                                  revocation of the Order would likely                      351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). See also Procedures for
                                                  lead to continuation or recurrence of                     Conducting Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of               return or destruction of proprietary
                                                  dumping at the levels indicated in the                    Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63
                                                                                                            FR 13516, 13519 (March 20, 1998) (the Department             6 See Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the

                                                                                                            normally will conduct an expedited sunset review           People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
                                                    1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80   where respondent interested parties provide an             Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
                                                  FR 45945 (August 3, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).        inadequate response).                                      Order, 76 FR 7534 (February 10, 2011).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014    17:30 Jun 07, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00011    Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM      08JNN1


                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices                                                         36871

                                                  information disclosed under APO in                      Background                                             Methodology
                                                  accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.                                                                                   The Department is conducting this
                                                  Timely notification of the return or                       The Department initiated this
                                                                                                          investigation on November 17, 2015.1                   investigation in accordance with section
                                                  destruction of APO materials or                                                                                731 of the Act. Export price is
                                                  conversion to judicial protective order is              For a complete description of the events
                                                                                                          that followed the initiation of this                   calculated in accordance with section
                                                  hereby requested. Failure to comply                                                                            772 of the Act and normal value (NV)
                                                  with the regulations and terms of an                    investigation, see the memorandum that
                                                                                                          is dated concurrently with this                        is calculated in accordance with section
                                                  APO is a violation which is subject to                                                                         773 of the Act. For a full description of
                                                  sanction.                                               determination and hereby adopted by
                                                                                                                                                                 the methodology underlying our
                                                    This sunset review and notice are in                  this notice.2 There is one mandatory
                                                                                                                                                                 preliminary conclusions, see the
                                                  accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),                respondent participating in this
                                                                                                                                                                 Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
                                                  and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR                     investigation, Al Jazeera Steel Products
                                                  351.218.                                                Co. SAOG (Al Jazeera). The Preliminary                 All-Others Rate
                                                                                                          Decision Memorandum is a public                          Consistent with sections
                                                    Dated: June 1, 2016.
                                                                                                          document and is on file electronically                 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5) of the Act,
                                                  Paul Piquado,                                           via Enforcement and Compliance’s                       the Department also calculated an
                                                  Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                 Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
                                                  Compliance.
                                                                                                                                                                 estimated all-others rate. Section
                                                                                                          Centralized Electronic Service System                  735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–13578 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]              (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to                       estimated all-others rate shall be an
                                                  BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  registered users at https://                           amount equal to the weighted average of
                                                                                                          access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the            the estimated weighted-average
                                                                                                          Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of                    dumping margins established for
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  the main Department of Commerce                        exporters and producers individually
                                                                                                          building. In addition, a complete                      investigated, excluding any zero and de
                                                  International Trade Administration
                                                                                                          version of the Preliminary Decision                    minimis margins, and any margins
                                                                                                          Memorandum can be found at http://                     determined entirely under section 776
                                                  [A–523–812]                                             enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed                 of the Act.
                                                                                                          Preliminary Decision Memorandum and                      In this investigation, we preliminarily
                                                  Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel
                                                                                                          the electronic version of the Preliminary              calculated an above de minimis margin
                                                  Pipe From the Sultanate of Oman:
                                                  Affirmative Preliminary Determination                   Decision Memorandum are identical in                   for Al Jazeera, the sole respondent in
                                                  of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and                    content.                                               this investigation. Therefore, the rate
                                                  Postponement of Final Determination                                                                            calculated for Al Jazeera is also assigned
                                                                                                          Scope of the Investigation
                                                                                                                                                                 as the all-others rate.
                                                  AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                       The product covered by this                         Preliminary Determination 4
                                                  International Trade Administration,                     investigation is CWP from Oman.
                                                  Department of Commerce.                                 Interested parties filed comments                        The Department preliminarily
                                                                                                          regarding the scope of the investigation,              determines that the following weighted-
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Department of Commerce                                                                          average dumping margins exist:
                                                                                                          which resulted in one clarification to
                                                  (Department) preliminarily determines
                                                                                                          the scope language and are addressed,
                                                  that circular welded carbon-quality steel                                                                                                                  Weighted-
                                                  pipe (CWP) from the Sultanate of Oman                   in detail, in the Department’s                                                                      average
                                                                                                          Preliminary Scope Decision                                         Exporter/                       dumping
                                                  (Oman) is being, or is likely to be, sold                                                                                 manufacturer                      margin
                                                  in the United States at less than fair                  Memorandum.3 For a full description of
                                                                                                                                                                                                             (percent)
                                                  value (LTFV), as provided in section                    the scope of this investigation, see the
                                                  733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                    ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in                     Al Jazeera Steel Products
                                                  amended (the Act). The period of                        Appendix I of this notice.                               Co. SAOG .........................               7.86
                                                  investigation (POI) is October 1, 2014,                                                                        All Others ..............................          7.86
                                                                                                            1 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe
                                                  through September 30, 2015. The
                                                                                                          From the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, the              Suspension of Liquidation
                                                  estimated weighted-average dumping                      Philippines, the United Arab Emirates, and the
                                                  margins of sales at LTFV are shown in                   Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-        In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
                                                  the ‘‘Preliminary Determination’’                       Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 73708            of the Act, we will direct U.S. Customs
                                                  section of this notice. Interested parties              (November 25, 2015).
                                                                                                            2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
                                                                                                                                                                 and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
                                                  are invited to comment on this                                                                                 liquidation of all entries of subject
                                                                                                          Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
                                                  preliminary determination.                              Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,       merchandise from Oman, as described
                                                                                                          Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                in Appendix I of this notice, for all
                                                  DATES:   Effective June 8, 2016.                        Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
                                                                                                          the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping
                                                                                                                                                                 companies, which are entered, or
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                               withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                                                                          Duty Investigation of Circular Welded Carbon-
                                                  Katherine Johnson or Terre Keaton                       Quality Steel Pipe From the Sultanate of Oman’’        consumption on or after the date of
                                                  Stefanova, AD/CVD Operations, Office                    (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated               publication of this notice in the Federal
                                                  II, Enforcement and Compliance,                         concurrently with this notice.
                                                                                                            3 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping
                                                                                                                                                                 Register.
                                                  International Trade Administration,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                          Duty Investigations of Circular Welded Carbon-
                                                  U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th                       Quality Steel Pipe From the Sultanate of Oman,           4 On March 14, 2016, the Department postponed
                                                  Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,                     Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, and the            the preliminary determination in this investigation
                                                  Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)                  Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Countervailing       until May 31, 2016, see Circular Welded Carbon-
                                                  482–4929 or (202) 482–1280,                             Duty Investigation of Circular Welded Carbon-          Quality Steel Pipe From the Sultanate of Oman,
                                                                                                          Quality Steel Pipe form Pakistan; Scope Comments       Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates, and the
                                                  respectively.                                           Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary                Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Postponement of
                                                                                                          Determinations,’’ dated April 1, 2016 (Preliminary     Preliminary Determinations of Antidumping Duty
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              Scope Decision Memorandum).                            Investigations, 81 FR 15039 (March 21, 2016).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:30 Jun 07, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00012   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM    08JNN1



Document Created: 2016-06-08 03:10:13
Document Modified: 2016-06-08 03:10:13
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactAndrew Devine, Enforcement and Compliance, Office V, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0238.
FR Citation81 FR 36870 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR