81_FR_38228 81 FR 38115 - Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes

81 FR 38115 - Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 113 (June 13, 2016)

Page Range38115-38117
FR Document2016-13854

We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E airplanes installed with an affected engine mounting frame assembly. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as longitudinal material separation on the internal surface of the engine mounting frame assembly tubes. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38115-38117]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7048; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E 
airplanes installed with an affected engine mounting frame assembly. 
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another 
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation 
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as longitudinal 
material separation on the internal surface of the engine mounting 
frame assembly tubes. We are issuing this proposed AD to require 
actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC-12, CH-6371 Stans, 
Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73 11; email: 
aircraft.com">SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus-aircraft.com. 
You may review this referenced service information at the FAA, Small 
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 
329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7048; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments 
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket 
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments 
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-7048; 
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA 
AD No. 2016-0081, dated April 25, 2016 (referred to after this as ``the 
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. 
Models PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E airplanes and was based 
on mandatory continuing airworthiness information originated by an 
aviation authority of another country. The MCAI states:

    The PC-12 Engine Mounting Frame Assembly (hereafter referred to 
as ``EMF'' in this AD), Part Number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, is a welded 
structure including three special tubes, P/N 571.20.12.073, P/N 
571.20.12.074 and P/N 571.20.12.107, the ends of which are subject 
to a special swaging process during manufacturing. Longitudinal 
material separation on the internal surface of the special tubes was 
detected on few EMFs on new production aeroplanes. Investigations 
identified the root cause to be an incorrect accomplishment of the 
swaging process.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to 
growth of the material separation and subsequent partial or complete 
failure of the structural joint, possibly resulting in in-flight 
detachment of the engine and consequent reduced control, or loss of 
control, of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Pilatus issued 
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 71-009, now at Revision 2 (hereafter 
referred to as ``the SB'' in this AD), to provide inspection 
instructions for the affected EMF to detect indications of material 
separation.
    For the reason described above, this AD requires identification 
and inspection of the

[[Page 38116]]

affected EMF and, depending on the findings, their replacement with 
serviceable EMF.

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7048.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. has issued PILATUS PC-12 Service Bulletin No: 
71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification No: EC-15-0632, Revision 2, 
dated March 18, 2016; Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame, Removal/
Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-A-71-00-05-00A-920A-
A, dated February 26, 2010, found in Pilatus Model type--PC-12, PC-12/
45, PC-12/47 MSN-101-888 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Document 
No. 02049, 12-A-AM-00-00-00-I; and Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame, 
Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-B-71-00-05-
00A-920A-A, dated October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus Model type--PC-12/
47E MSN-1001-UP Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Document No. 02300, 
12-B-AM-00-00-00-I. The service information describes procedures for 
determining if an affected engine mounting frame assembly (EMF) is 
installed, inspecting the EMF, and replacing the EMF with a serviceable 
EMF. This service information is reasonably available because the 
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of 
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this 
NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they 
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and 
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because 
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists 
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type 
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 888 products of U.S. 
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per 
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The 
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on 
U.S. operators to be $226,440, or $255 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would 
cost the following amounts. We have no way of determining the number of 
products that may need these actions.
    The visual and eddy current inspections would take about 3 work-
hours for a cost of $255 per product.
    The replacement of the EMF would take about 90 work-hours and 
require parts costing $33,336, for a cost of $40,986 per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed 
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on 
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected 
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost 
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD: Docket No. FAA-2016-7048; Directorate 
Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 28, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC-12, PC-12/45, 
PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
    (1) Installed with an affected serial number engine mounting 
frame assembly (EMF), part number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, listed in 
figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD; and

Figure 1 to Paragraph (c)(1) of This AD--EMF P/N 571.20.12.036, Affected
                             Serial Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001 through 1200 inclusive.
1202 through 1272 inclusive.
1275 through 1323 inclusive.
1325 through 1328 inclusive.
1334 through 1338 inclusive.
1340 and 1342.
1344 through 1346 inclusive.
1348 and 1349.
1358, 1361, and 1365.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) Certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 71: Power Plant.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another 
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation 
product. The MCAI

[[Page 38117]]

describes the unsafe condition as longitudinal material separation 
on the internal surface of the engine mounting frame assembly tubes 
(EMF). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct material 
separation on the internal surface of the engine mounting frame 
assembly tubes, which could lead to partial or complete failure of 
the structural joint and possibly result in in-flight detachment of 
the engine with consequent loss of control.



 (f) Actions and Compliance

    Do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (7) of this AD. If 
paragraphs (f)(1) through (6) of this AD have already been done 
before the effective date of this AD, then only paragraph (f)(7) of 
this AD applies.
    (1) Within the compliance time identified in figure 2 of 
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do an ultrasonic inspection of the 
swaged engine mounting tube ends of the affected EMF following the 
instructions of paragraph 3.B.(1) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS 
PC-12 Service Bulletin No: 71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification 
No: EC-15-0632, Revision 2, dated March 18, 2016.

    Figure 2 to Paragraph (f)(1) of This AD--Initial Compliance Time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A or B, whichever occurs later:
  A Before the EMF exceeds 11,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 13,500
   flight cycles (FC), whichever occurs first since first installation
   of the EMF on an airplane.
  B Within 1,000 hours TIS or 1,000 FC or 6 months, whichever occurs
   first after the effective date of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) If an indication with an echo of less than 40 percent full 
screen height is detected on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection 
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, except for paragraph 
(f)(7), no further actions are required for this AD. Document 
compliance with this AD in the maintenance records.
    (3) If an indication with an echo of 40 percent full screen 
height or more is detected on an EMF during the ultrasonic 
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the actions 
in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through (iii) of this AD, as applicable.
    (i) Before further flight and repetitively thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs 
first, do a visual inspection of the welding and do an eddy current 
inspection of the tubes at the indication point detected during the 
ultrasonic inspection. Use the instructions of paragraphs 3.B.(2) 
and 3.B.(3) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS PC-12 Service Bulletin 
No: 71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification No: EC-15-0632, Revision 
2, dated March 18, 2016.
    (ii) If any cracks are found during any of the visual 
inspections or if an indication with a signal of 20 percent or more 
is detected during any of the eddy current inspections required in 
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD, before further flight, replace the 
EMF with a serviceable EMF following the instructions in the service 
information listed in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all 
subparagraphs as applicable.
    (iii) Unless already done as required by paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of 
this AD, within 1,800 hours TIS or 36 months after the initial 
visual and eddy current inspections of the affected EMF required by 
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace the 
EMF with a serviceable EMF following the instructions in the service 
information listed in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all 
subparagraphs as applicable.
    (4) For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable EMF is defined as 
any EMF that is not listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this 
AD or an affected EMF that is listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) 
of this AD but has had the ultrasonic inspection required in 
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and had an indication with an echo of 
less than 40 percent full screen height.
    (5) For replacement of the EMF, follow the instructions listed 
in paragraphs (f)(5)(i) and (ii), as applicable.
    (i) For Models PC-12, PC-12/45, and PC-12/47, manufacturer 
serial numbers (MSN) 101-888: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame, 
Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-A-71-00-
05-00A-920A-A, dated February 26, 2010, found in Pilatus Model 
type--PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47 MSN-101-888 Aircraft Maintenance 
Manual (AMM), Document No. 02049, 12-A-AM-00-00-00-I.
    (ii) For Model PC-12/47E, MSN 1001 and up: Pilatus Powerplant 
Mounting Frame, Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical 
publication 12-B-71-00-05-00A-920A-A, dated October 4, 2010, found 
in Pilatus Model type--PC-12/47E MSN-1001-UP Aircraft Maintenance 
Manual (AMM), Document No. 02300, 12-B-AM-00-00-00-I.
    (6) If an EMF has an indication with an echo of 40 percent or 
more during the ultrasonic inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) 
of this AD, you may replace the EMF with a serviceable EMF in lieu 
of the visual or eddy current inspections required in paragraph 
(f)(3)(i) of this AD. For replacement of the EMF, follow the 
instructions in the service information listed in paragraph (f)(5) 
of this AD, including all subparagraphs as applicable.
    (7) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install an EMF 
P/N 571.20.12.036 unless it has been determined to be a serviceable 
EMF as specified in paragraph (f)(4) of this AD.
    (8) Airplanes with an MSN of 1556 or higher are not affected by 
this AD provided that the EMF has not been replaced since its 
manufacture. A review of the maintenance records, Airworthiness 
Approval Tag (FAA Form 8130-3), or other positive form of parts 
identification such as a shipping ticket, invoice, or direct ship 
authority letter, can be used to determine the serial number of the 
EMF.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small 
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: 
[email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane 
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal 
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(h) Related Information

    (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 
2016-0081, dated April 25, 2016, for related information pertaining 
to this AD.
    (2) You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2016-7048. For service information related to this AD, contact 
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC-12, CH-6371 Stans, 
Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73 11; email: 
aircraft.com">SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus-
aircraft.com.
    (3) You may review this referenced service information at the 
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call (816) 329-4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3, 2016.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-13854 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules 38115 paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD continuing airworthiness information 4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; email: apply. (MCAI) originated by an aviation doug.rudolph@faa.gov. (i) The steps labeled as RC, including authority of another country to identify SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: substeps under an RC step and any figures and correct an unsafe condition on an identified in an RC step, must be done to Comments Invited comply with the AD. An AMOC is required aviation product. The MCAI describes for any deviations to RC steps, including the unsafe condition as longitudinal We invite you to send any written substeps and identified figures. material separation on the internal relevant data, views, or arguments about (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be surface of the engine mounting frame this proposed AD. Send your comments deviated from using accepted methods in assembly tubes. We are issuing this to an address listed under the accordance with the operator’s maintenance proposed AD to require actions to ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. or inspection program without obtaining address the unsafe condition on these FAA–2016–7048; Directorate Identifier approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, products. 2016–CE–014–AD’’ at the beginning of including substeps and identified figures, can your comments. We specifically invite still be done as specified, and the airplane DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 28, 2016. comments on the overall regulatory, can be put back in an airworthy condition. economic, environmental, and energy (i) Related Information ADDRESSES: You may send comments by aspects of this proposed AD. We will any of the following methods: consider all comments received by the (1) For more information about this AD, • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to contact Eric Igama, Aerospace Engineer, closing date and may amend this Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130L, http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the proposed AD because of those FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. comments. Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; We will post all comments we phone: 562–627–5388; fax: 562–627–5210; • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– receive, without change, to http:// email: roderick.igama@faa.gov. 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room regulations.gov, including any personal (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., information you provide. We will also Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Washington, DC 20590. post a report summarizing each Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of substantive verbal contact we receive D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001; Transportation, Docket Operations, M– about this proposed AD. telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room Discussion 206–766–5683; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., The European Aviation Safety Agency referenced service information at the FAA, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. (EASA), which is the Technical Agent Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, for the Member States of the European Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information except Federal holidays. Community, has issued EASA AD No. on the availability of this material at the For service information identified in FAA, call 425–227–1221. 2016–0081, dated April 25, 2016 this proposed AD, contact Pilatus (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3, Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC–12, correct an unsafe condition for 2016. CH–6371 Stans, Switzerland; phone: PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC– Michael Kaszycki, +41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73 12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47, and PC–12/ Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 11; email: SupportPC12@pilatus- 47E airplanes and was based on Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus- mandatory continuing airworthiness [FR Doc. 2016–13734 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] aircraft.com. You may review this information originated by an aviation referenced service information at the BILLING CODE 4910–13–P authority of another country. The MCAI FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 states: Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of The PC–12 Engine Mounting Frame DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Assembly (hereafter referred to as ‘‘EMF’’ in this material at the FAA, call (816) 329– this AD), Part Number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, is Federal Aviation Administration 4148. a welded structure including three special Examining the AD Docket tubes, P/N 571.20.12.073, P/N 571.20.12.074 14 CFR Part 39 and P/N 571.20.12.107, the ends of which are You may examine the AD docket on the subject to a special swaging process during [Docket No. FAA–2016–7048; Directorate Internet at http://www.regulations.gov Identifier 2016–CE–014–AD] manufacturing. Longitudinal material by searching for and locating Docket No. separation on the internal surface of the RIN 2120–AA64 FAA–2016–7048; or in person at the special tubes was detected on few EMFs on Docket Management Facility between 9 new production aeroplanes. Investigations Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through identified the root cause to be an incorrect AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD accomplishment of the swaging process. This condition, if not detected and AGENCY: Federal Aviation docket contains this proposed AD, the corrected, could lead to growth of the Administration (FAA), Department of regulatory evaluation, any comments material separation and subsequent partial or Transportation (DOT). received, and other information. The complete failure of the structural joint, street address for the Docket Office possibly resulting in in-flight detachment of ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the the engine and consequent reduced control, mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS (NPRM). ADDRESSES section. Comments will be or loss of control, of the aeroplane. SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new available in the AD docket shortly after To address this potential unsafe condition, receipt. Pilatus issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 71– airworthiness directive (AD) for 009, now at Revision 2 (hereafter referred to PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: as ‘‘the SB’’ in this AD), to provide 12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47, and PC–12/ Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, inspection instructions for the affected EMF 47E airplanes installed with an affected FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 to detect indications of material separation. engine mounting frame assembly. This Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, For the reason described above, this AD proposed AD results from mandatory Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329– requires identification and inspection of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1

38116 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules affected EMF and, depending on the findings, operators to be $226,440, or $255 per (4) Will not have a significant their replacement with serviceable EMF. product. economic impact, positive or negative, You may examine the MCAI on the In addition, we estimate that any on a substantial number of small entities Internet at http://www.regulations.gov necessary follow-on actions would cost under the criteria of the Regulatory by searching for and locating Docket No. the following amounts. We have no way Flexibility Act. FAA–2016–7048. of determining the number of products List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 that may need these actions. Related Service Information Under 1 The visual and eddy current Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation CFR Part 51 inspections would take about 3 work- safety, Incorporation by reference, PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. has issued hours for a cost of $255 per product. Safety. PILATUS PC–12 Service Bulletin No: The replacement of the EMF would The Proposed Amendment 71–009, Reference No: 345, take about 90 work-hours and require Modification No: EC–15–0632, Revision parts costing $33,336, for a cost of Accordingly, under the authority 2, dated March 18, 2016; Pilatus $40,986 per product. delegated to me by the Administrator, Powerplant Mounting Frame, Removal/ According to the manufacturer, some the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part Installation, Date module/Technical of the costs of this proposed AD may be 39 as follows: publication 12–A–71–00–05–00A– covered under warranty, thereby 920A–A, dated February 26, 2010, reducing the cost impact on affected PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS found in Pilatus Model type—PC–12, individuals. We do not control warranty DIRECTIVES PC–12/45, PC–12/47 MSN–101–888 coverage for affected individuals. As a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), result, we have included all costs in our continues to read as follows: Document No. 02049, 12–A–AM–00– cost estimate. 00–00–I; and Pilatus Powerplant Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Authority for This Rulemaking Mounting Frame, Removal/Installation, § 39.13 [Amended] Date module/Technical publication 12– Title 49 of the United States Code ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding B–71–00–05–00A–920A–A, dated specifies the FAA’s authority to issue the following new AD: October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus Model rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, type—PC–12/47E MSN–1001–UP section 106, describes the authority of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD: Docket No. FAA– Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 2016–7048; Directorate Identifier 2016– Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more CE–014–AD. Document No. 02300, 12–B–AM–00– 00–00–I. The service information detail the scope of the Agency’s (a) Comments Due Date describes procedures for determining if authority. We must receive comments by July 28, an affected engine mounting frame We are issuing this rulemaking under 2016. assembly (EMF) is installed, inspecting the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, (b) Affected ADs the EMF, and replacing the EMF with a Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that None. serviceable EMF. This service information is reasonably available section, Congress charges the FAA with (c) Applicability because the interested parties have promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in This AD applies to PILATUS AIRCRAFT access to it through their normal course air commerce by prescribing regulations LTD. Models PC–12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47, of business or by the means identified for practices, methods, and procedures and PC–12/47E airplanes, all serial numbers, in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM. the Administrator finds necessary for that are: safety in air commerce. This regulation (1) Installed with an affected serial number FAA’s Determination and Requirements is within the scope of that authority engine mounting frame assembly (EMF), part of the Proposed AD because it addresses an unsafe condition number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, listed in figure This product has been approved by that is likely to exist or develop on 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD; and the aviation authority of another products identified in this rulemaking country, and is approved for operation action. FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(1) OF in the United States. Pursuant to our THIS AD—EMF P/N 571.20.12.036, bilateral agreement with this State of Regulatory Findings AFFECTED SERIAL NUMBERS Design Authority, they have notified us We determined that this proposed AD of the unsafe condition described in the would not have federalism implications 0001 through 1200 inclusive. under Executive Order 13132. This 1202 through 1272 inclusive. MCAI and service information 1275 through 1323 inclusive. referenced above. We are proposing this proposed AD would not have a 1325 through 1328 inclusive. AD because we evaluated all substantial direct effect on the States, on 1334 through 1338 inclusive. information and determined the unsafe the relationship between the national 1340 and 1342. Government and the States, or on the 1344 through 1346 inclusive. condition exists and is likely to exist or 1348 and 1349. develop on other products of the same distribution of power and 1358, 1361, and 1365. type design. responsibilities among the various levels of government. (2) Certificated in any category. Costs of Compliance For the reasons discussed above, I (d) Subject We estimate that this proposed AD certify this proposed regulation: mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS will affect 888 products of U.S. registry. (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Air Transport Association of America We also estimate that it would take action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (ATA) Code 71: Power Plant. about 3 work-hours per product to (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under (e) Reason comply with the basic requirements of the DOT Regulatory Policies and This AD was prompted by mandatory this proposed AD. The average labor Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) rate is $85 per work-hour. 1979), originated by an aviation authority of another Based on these figures, we estimate (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation country to identify and correct an unsafe the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. in Alaska, and condition on an aviation product. The MCAI VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules 38117 describes the unsafe condition as (f)(5) of this AD, including all subparagraphs for this AD, if requested using the procedures longitudinal material separation on the as applicable. found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to internal surface of the engine mounting frame (iii) Unless already done as required by ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, assembly tubes (EMF). We are issuing this paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this AD, within 1,800 FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, AD to detect and correct material separation hours TIS or 36 months after the initial visual Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; on the internal surface of the engine and eddy current inspections of the affected telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329– mounting frame assembly tubes, which could EMF required by paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this 4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before lead to partial or complete failure of the AD, whichever occurs first, replace the EMF using any approved AMOC on any airplane structural joint and possibly result in in- with a serviceable EMF following the to which the AMOC applies, notify your flight detachment of the engine with instructions in the service information listed appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the consequent loss of control. in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), subparagraphs as applicable. or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (4) For the purpose of this AD, a (2) Airworthy Product: For any (f) Actions and Compliance serviceable EMF is defined as any EMF that requirement in this AD to obtain corrective Do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through is not listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of actions from a manufacturer or other source, (7) of this AD. If paragraphs (f)(1) through (6) this AD or an affected EMF that is listed in use these actions if they are FAA-approved. of this AD have already been done before the figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD but has Corrective actions are considered FAA- effective date of this AD, then only paragraph had the ultrasonic inspection required in approved if they are approved by the State (f)(7) of this AD applies. paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and had an of Design Authority (or their delegated (1) Within the compliance time identified indication with an echo of less than 40 agent). You are required to assure the product in figure 2 of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do percent full screen height. is airworthy before it is returned to service. an ultrasonic inspection of the swaged engine (5) For replacement of the EMF, follow the instructions listed in paragraphs (f)(5)(i) and (h) Related Information mounting tube ends of the affected EMF following the instructions of paragraph (ii), as applicable. (1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation 3.B.(1) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD (i) For Models PC–12, PC–12/45, and PC– Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2016–0081, PILATUS PC–12 Service Bulletin No: 71– 12/47, manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) dated April 25, 2016, for related information 009, Reference No: 345, Modification No: 101–888: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting pertaining to this AD. EC–15–0632, Revision 2, dated March 18, Frame, Removal/Installation, Date module/ (2) You may examine the MCAI on the 2016. Technical publication 12–A–71–00–05–00A– Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 920A–A, dated February 26, 2010, found in searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– Pilatus Model type—PC–12, PC–12/45, PC– 2016–7048. For service information related to FIGURE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (f)(1) OF 12/47 MSN–101–888 Aircraft Maintenance this AD, contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., THIS AD—INITIAL COMPLIANCE TIME Manual (AMM), Document No. 02049, 12–A– Customer Support PC–12, CH–6371 Stans, AM–00–00–00–I. Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax: A or B, whichever occurs later: (ii) For Model PC–12/47E, MSN 1001 and +41 41 619 73 11; email: SupportPC12@ A Before the EMF exceeds 11,000 hours up: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame, pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus- time-in-service (TIS) or 13,500 flight cy- cles (FC), whichever occurs first since Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical aircraft.com. first installation of the EMF on an air- publication 12–B–71–00–05–00A–920A–A, (3) You may review this referenced service plane. dated October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus information at the FAA, Small Airplane B Within 1,000 hours TIS or 1,000 FC or Model type—PC–12/47E MSN–1001–UP Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, 6 months, whichever occurs first after Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Missouri 64106. For information on the the effective date of this AD. Document No. 02300, 12–B–AM–00–00–00– availability of this material at the FAA, call I. (816) 329–4148. (2) If an indication with an echo of less (6) If an EMF has an indication with an than 40 percent full screen height is detected Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3, echo of 40 percent or more during the on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection 2016. ultrasonic inspection required in paragraph required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, except (f)(1) of this AD, you may replace the EMF Melvin Johnson, for paragraph (f)(7), no further actions are with a serviceable EMF in lieu of the visual Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, required for this AD. Document compliance or eddy current inspections required in Aircraft Certification Service. with this AD in the maintenance records. paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD. For [FR Doc. 2016–13854 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] (3) If an indication with an echo of 40 replacement of the EMF, follow the BILLING CODE 4910–13–P percent full screen height or more is detected instructions in the service information listed on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the subparagraphs as applicable. actions in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through (iii) of (7) As of the effective date of this AD, do DEPARTMENT OF LABOR this AD, as applicable. not install an EMF P/N 571.20.12.036 unless (i) Before further flight and repetitively it has been determined to be a serviceable Occupational Safety and Health thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600 hours EMF as specified in paragraph (f)(4) of this Administration TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs first, do AD. a visual inspection of the welding and do an (8) Airplanes with an MSN of 1556 or 29 CFR Part 1910 eddy current inspection of the tubes at the higher are not affected by this AD provided indication point detected during the that the EMF has not been replaced since its [Docket No. OSHA–2008–0012] ultrasonic inspection. Use the instructions of manufacture. A review of the maintenance RIN 1218–AC40 paragraphs 3.B.(2) and 3.B.(3) of PILATUS records, Airworthiness Approval Tag (FAA AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS PC–12 Service Form 8130–3), or other positive form of parts Tree Care Operations Bulletin No: 71–009, Reference No: 345, identification such as a shipping ticket, Modification No: EC–15–0632, Revision 2, invoice, or direct ship authority letter, can be AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS dated March 18, 2016. used to determine the serial number of the Administration (OSHA), Department of (ii) If any cracks are found during any of EMF. Labor. the visual inspections or if an indication with a signal of 20 percent or more is detected (g) Other FAA AD Provisions ACTION: Notice of stakeholder meeting. during any of the eddy current inspections The following provisions also apply to this required in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD, AD: SUMMARY: OSHA invites interested before further flight, replace the EMF with a (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance parties to participate in an informal serviceable EMF following the instructions in (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, stakeholder meeting concerning tree the service information listed in paragraph FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs care operations on July 13, 2016, in VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM 13JNP1


Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:40:00
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:40:00
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
DatesWe must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 28, 2016.
ContactDoug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 38115 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR