81 FR 38131 - Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 113 (June 13, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 113 (June 13, 2016)
| Page Range | 38131-38134 | |
| FR Document | 2016-13968 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 38131-38134] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-13968] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-501] Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request by interested parties,\1\ the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey.\2\ The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2014, to April 30, 2015. \3\ The [[Page 38132]] Department preliminarily determines that Toscelik made U.S. sales of subject merchandise below normal value (NV) while Borusan did not make sales of subject merchandise below NV. In addition, the Department preliminarily finds that Erbosan and the Yucel Group had no reviewable shipments during the POR. The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled ``Preliminary Results of Review.'' Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Wheatland Tube Company, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret requested the instant administrative review. \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 37588 (July 1, 2015) (Initiation Notice). The Department subsequently published a second initiation notice to correct the spelling of two company names in that notice. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 45947 (August 3, 2015). \3\ This review covers the following companies: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Borusan); Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Toscelik); Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S. (Toscelik Metal);1 Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari San ve Tic (Borusan Birlesik); Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri A.S. (Borusan Gemlik); Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ihracat); Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ithicat); Tubeco Pipe and Steel Corporation (Tubeco); Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); and Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, the Yucel Group). We note that in prior segments of this proceeding, we treated Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal as the same legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 n.8 (December 1, 2014). However, in a prior review, we found that Toscelik Metal has ceased to exist. Id. There is no record evidence for altering this treatment. Therefore, for these preliminary results, we are treating Toscelik and Tosyali as the same legal entity, and continue to find that Toscelik Metal no longer exists. Additionally we note that in prior segments of this proceeding, we treated Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as the same legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014, 80 FR 76674, 76674 n.2 (December 10, 2015). We preliminarily determine that there is no evidence on the record for altering our treatment of Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S., as the same legal entity. Finally, as noted above, we initiated a review of (1) Borusan Birlesik; (2) Borusan Gemlik, (3) Borusan Ihracat, (4) Borusan Ithicat, and (5) Tubeco. See Initiation Notice. Although the Department may have treated these companies as part of a ``Borusan Group'' entity in prior segments, the current record does not support treating these companies as part of the Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. entity. Accordingly, as discussed infra, each of these five companies will be assigned the rate applicable to companies not selected for individual examination in this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: June 13, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, Scott Hoefke, or Robert James at (202) 482-4475, (202) 482-4947, or (202) 482-0649, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 2013-2014 Administrative Review'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On July 2, 2015 and July 17, 2015, Erbosan and the Yucel Group, respectively, submitted letters to the Department certifying that they had no sales, shipments, or entries of the subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. \4\ Erbosan further certified that it did not know or have reason to know that any of its customers would subsequently export or sell Erbosan's merchandise to the United States during the POR. On August 11, 2015, consistent with our practice, the Department issued ``No Shipment Inquiries'' to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to confirm that there were no entries of welded pipe and tube from Turkey exported by either Erbosan or Yucel Group during the POR.\5\ We received no information from CBP that contradicted the Yucel Group's no shipment claim. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Letter to the Department from Erbosan entitled ``No Shipment Certification of Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (``ERBOSAN'') in the 2013-2014 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order Involving Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe from Turkey,'' dated July 2, 2015; see also Letter to the Department from Yucel Group entitled ``Welded Carbon Steel Pipe & Tube Products from Turkey: Notification of No Shipments'' dated July 17, 2015. \5\ See Customs email message number 5223304, dated August 11, 2015 (Erbosan); see also Customs email message number 5223305, dated August 11, 2015 (Yucel Group). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department did however, receive information from CBP indicating possible shipments from Erbosan. As further discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memo, subsequent to these Preliminary Resuls, we intend to solicit comments from interested parties concerning Erbosan's no shipment claim.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based the foregoing, we preliminarily determine that Erbosan and Yucel Group had no reviewable shipments during the POR. Also, consistent with our practice, the Department finds that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to Erbosan or the Yucel Group, but rather to complete the review with respect to both Erbosan and the Yucel Group, and to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\7\ Thus, if we continue to find that Erbosan and Yucel Group had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan or Yucel Group, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). \8\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy [[Page 38133]] investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual review in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted- average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Toscelik that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, the Department preliminarily assigned to the companies not individually examined (Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco) the 0.96 percent weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Toscelik. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the weighted-average dumping margins for the period May 1, 2014 through April 30, 2015 are as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Also includes Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. See footnote 4. \10\ Also includes Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. See footnote 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S \9\........... 0.00 Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S \10\.................. 0.96 Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari San ve Tic................ 0.96 Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri A.S........................... 0.96 Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S...................... 0.96 Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S.............................. 0.96 Tubeco Pipe and Steel Corporation........................... 0.96 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\11\ Interested parties may submit cases briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the due date for filing case briefs.\13\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\14\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\15\ In order to be properly filed, ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically-filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\16\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. If Borusan's or Toscelik's weighted-average dumping margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the methodology described in the ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies'' section, above. With respect to Erbosan and Yucel Group, if we continue to find that Erbosan and Yucel Group had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan or Yucel Group, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Borusan and Toscelik will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other manufacturers and exporters covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less- than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\18\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 38134]] Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 6, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Rates for Non Examined Companies 6. Comparisons to Normal Value 7. Product Comparisons 8. Date of Sale 9. Export Price 10. Normal Value 11. Currency Conversion 12. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-13968 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Notices 38131
Whereas, the Board adopts the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Dated: June 7, 2016.
findings and recommendations of the Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Paul Piquado,
examiner’s memorandum, and finds that Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Compliance, International Trade Compliance.
Board’s regulations are satisfied; Administration, U.S. Department of [FR Doc. 2016–13953 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
Now, therefore, the Board hereby Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
approves the expansion of Subzone 78A Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
on behalf of Nissan North America, Inc., telephone: (202) 482–1394, or (202)
as described in the application and 482–4031, respectively. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Federal Register notice, subject to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, International Trade Administration
including Section 400.13. Postponement of Preliminary [A–489–501]
Determination
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June 2016. On February 16, 2016, the Department Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe
Paul Piquado, of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published and Tube Products From Turkey:
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for a notice initiating an antidumping duty Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate investigation of certain biaxial integral Duty Administrative Review, and
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. geogrid products from the People’s Partial Rescission of Review; 2014-
Andrew McGilvray, Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 Section 2015
Executive Secretary. 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
[FR Doc. 2016–13946 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR International Trade Administration,
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 351.205(b)(1) state that the Department U.S. Department of Commerce.
will make a preliminary determination
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
no later than 140 days after the date of
interested parties,1 the Department of
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the initiation (i.e., February 8, 2016).
Commerce (the Department) is
Accordingly, the preliminary
International Trade Administration conducting an administrative review of
determination of this antidumping duty
the antidumping duty order on welded
investigation is currently due no later
Submission for OMB Review; carbon steel standard pipe and tube
than June 27, 2016.
Comment Request; Correction products (welded pipe and tube) from
On May 27, 2016, Tensar Corporation Turkey.2 The period of review (POR) is
Agency: International Trade (‘‘Petitioner’’), made a timely request, May 1, 2014, to April 30, 2015. 3 The
Administration (ITA). Department of pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e), for
Commerce. postponement of the preliminary 1 Wheatland Tube Company, Borusan
Title: Procedures for Importation of determination, in order to facilitate the Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and
Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Department’s analysis of respondents’ Borusan Istikbal Ticaret requested the instant
Work. questionnaire responses and interested administrative review.
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
OMB Control Number: 0625–0256. parties’ surrogate value data Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
Type of Request: Regular Submission. submissions. Because there are no 37588 (July 1, 2015) (Initiation Notice). The
In the Federal Register of April 11, compelling reasons to deny the request, Department subsequently published a second
2016, FR Vol. 81, No, 69, Page 21315– in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) initiation notice to correct the spelling of two
company names in that notice. See Initiation of
21316, under Section II. ‘‘Method of of the Act, the Department is postponing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Collection,’’ the second line in the the deadline for the preliminary Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 45947 (August 3,
paragraph after Attention: should read determination by 50 days.2 2015).
‘‘Enforcement and Compliance’’ instead For the reasons stated above, the 3 This review covers the following companies:
of ‘‘Import Administration.’’ Department, in accordance with section Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan
Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
Dated: June 8, 2016. 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing (collectively, Borusan); Toscelik Profil ve Sac
Glenna Mickelson, the deadline for the preliminary Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
determination to no later than 190 days (collectively, Toscelik); Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.
after the date on which the Department (Toscelik Metal);1 Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari
Information Officer. San ve Tic (Borusan Birlesik); Borusan Gemlik Boru
initiated this investigation. Therefore, Tesisleri A.S. (Borusan Gemlik); Borusan Ihracat
[FR Doc. 2016–13859 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
the new deadline for the preliminary Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ihracat); Borusan
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
determination is August 16, 2016. In Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ithicat); Tubeco
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Pipe and Steel Corporation (Tubeco); Erbosan
Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); and
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Act, the deadline for the final Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S., Yucelboru
determination of this investigation will Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova
International Trade Administration continue to be 75 days after the date of Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, the Yucel
the preliminary determination, unless Group).
[A–570–036] We note that in prior segments of this proceeding,
postponed at a later date. we treated Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.,
Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid This notice is issued and published Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal as the
Products from the People’s Republic pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act same legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey:
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
of China: Postponement of Preliminary Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Determination of Antidumping Duty Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 n.8
1 See Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid Products
Investigation (December 1, 2014). However, in a prior review, we
from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of found that Toscelik Metal has ceased to exist. Id.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Antidumping Duty Investigation, 81 FR 7755 There is no record evidence for altering this
(February 16, 2016). treatment. Therefore, for these preliminary results,
International Trade Administration, 2 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from we are treating Toscelik and Tosyali as the same
Department of Commerce. Petitioner ‘‘Request to Postpone Preliminary legal entity, and continue to find that Toscelik
DATES: June 13, 2016. Determination’’ (May 27, 2016). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_38244/page/1.svg)
![38134 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Notices
Notification to Importers FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: this review. The parties were permitted
This notice also serves as a Robert Galantucci, AD/CVD Operations, to submit comments within 50 days of
preliminary reminder to importers of Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, the publication of our Preliminary
their responsibility under 19 CFR International Trade Administration, Results, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 351.309(c)(1)(i). The Department
regarding the reimbursement of Street and Constitution Avenue NW., received no comments.
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2923. Scope of the Orders
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For the purpose of these Orders, the
this requirement could result in the Background products covered are all seamless
Secretary’s presumption that circular refined copper pipes and tubes.
On November 22, 2010, the
reimbursement of antidumping duties The products subject to the Orders are
Department published the antidumping
occurred and the subsequent assessment currently classifiable under subheadings
duty orders on copper pipe and tube
of double antidumping duties. 7411.10.1030 and 7411.10.1090 of the
We are issuing and publishing these from the PRC and Mexico.1 On October
1, 2015, the Department published the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
results in accordance with sections
notice of initiation of the sunset reviews United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Products
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
of the Orders pursuant to section 751(c) subject to the Orders may also enter
Dated: June 6, 2016. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended under HTSUS subheadings
Paul Piquado, (the ‘‘Act’’).2 The Ad Hoc Coalition for 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Domestically Produced Seamless 8415.90.8065 and 8415.90.8085.
Compliance. Refined Copper Pipe and Tube and its Although the HTSUS subheadings are
Appendix individual members, Cerro Flow provided for convenience and customs
Products, LLC, Wieland Copper purposes, the written description of the
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Products, LLC, Howell Metal Company,
Decision Memorandum scope of the Orders is dispositive.
Mueller Copper Tube Products, Inc.,
1. Summary and Mueller Copper Tube Company, For a full description of the scope of
2. Background Inc. (collectively, ‘‘domestic interested the Orders, see the ‘‘Preliminary
3. Scope of the Order parties’’), submitted adequate and Decision Memorandum.’’ 5
4. Preliminary Determination of No
timely notices of intent to participate in Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Shipments
5. Rates for Non Examined Companies these sunset reviews within the 15-day
6. Comparisons to Normal Value deadline specified in 19 CFR For the reasons expressed in the
7. Product Comparisons 351.218(d)(1)(i). On November 2, 2015, Preliminary Results, pursuant to section
8. Date of Sale domestic interested parties and 751(c) of the Act, the Department
9. Export Price respondent interested party Golden determines that revocation of the Orders
10. Normal Value Dragon 3 submitted adequate substantive
11. Currency Conversion
would likely lead to continuation or
responses to the notice of initiation recurrence of dumping at weighted-
12. Recommendation within the 30-day deadline specified in
average dumping margins up to 60.85
[FR Doc. 2016–13968 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). As a result,
percent for the PRC and up to 27.16
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(ii), the percent for Mexico.
Department conducted full sunset We are issuing and publishing these
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE reviews of the Orders. results and notice in accordance with
On January 26, 2016, the Department sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
International Trade Administration published the Preliminary Results 4 of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
[A–570–964; A–201–838] Dated: June 6, 2016.
1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and from Mexico and the People’s Republic of China: Paul Piquado,
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Tube From the People’s Republic of Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
China and Mexico: Final Results of the From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) Compliance.
Full Sunset Reviews of the (‘‘Orders’’). [FR Doc. 2016–13956 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
2 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
Antidumping Duty Orders BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
From China and Mexico; Institution of Five-Year
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Reviews, 80 FR 59186 (October 1, 2015) (‘‘Initiation
FR Notice’’).
International Trade Administration, 3 In case number A–570–964 (the PRC), the
Department of Commerce. substantive response was filed on behalf of Golden
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 4252 (January 26,
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc., Hong 2016) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
5 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the
reviews, the Department of Commerce Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd., GD Copper Cooperatief
UA, Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) Full Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
(‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation International, Ltd. and GD Copper (U.S.A.), Inc. In Orders on Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
of the antidumping duty orders on case number A–201–838 (Mexico), the substantive from the People’s Republic of China and Mexico,
seamless refined copper pipe and tube response was filed on behalf of GD Affiliates S. de dated January 19, 2016 (‘‘Preliminary Decision
(‘‘copper pipe and tube’’) from the R.L. de C.V., GD Copper S. de R.L. de C.V., Golden
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Memorandum’’). The Preliminary Decision
Dragon Precise Copper Tube Group, Inc., Hong
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) and Kong GD Trading Co., Ltd., GD Copper Cooperatief
Memorandum is a public document and is on file
Mexico would likely lead to electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s
UA, Golden Dragon Holding (Hong Kong)
continuation or recurrence of dumping, International, Ltd. and GD Copper (U.S.A.), Inc. The Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Department refers to all of these companies Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
collectively as ‘‘Golden Dragon’’. available to registered users at http://
Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of 4 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of
this notice. From the People’s Republic of China and Mexico: the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be
DATES: Effective Date: June 13, 2016. Preliminary Results of the Sunset Reviews of the accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:48 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_38244/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:40:02
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:40:02
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: June 13, 2016. | |
| Contact | Michael J. Heaney, Scott Hoefke, or Robert James at (202) 482-4475, (202) 482-4947, or (202) 482-0649, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 38131 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR