81 FR 39211 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 116 (June 16, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 116 (June 16, 2016)
| Page Range | 39211-39213 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14098 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 39211-39213] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14098] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0124; FRL-9946-38-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern, respectively, the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and emissions of VOCs from the surface coating operations of wood products. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on August 15, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 18, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2016-0124 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3024, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule and rule revision? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules D. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adopted/ Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended/ Submitted revised ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EKAPCD........................ 410.9 Wood Products Surface Coating 3/13/2014 7/25/2014 Operations. YSAQMD........................ 1.1 General Provisions and 7/08/2015 11/13/2015 Definitions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On September 11, 2014, and January 19, 2016, the EPA determined that the submittals for EKAPCD Rule 410.9 and YSAQMD Rule 1.1 respectively met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? There are no previous versions of Rule 410.9 in the SIP. We approved an earlier version of Rule 1.1 into the SIP on April 28, 2015 (80 FR 23449). C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule and rule revision? VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control [[Page 39212]] VOC emissions. Rule 410.9 limits and controls VOC emission from surface coating operations of wood products. The revisions to Rule 1.1 do not have a direct effect on air pollution emissions; they amend the definition of VOC that is used in other YSAQMD rules to exempt certain substances that have been determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity and which are excluded from the definition applied by the EPA. The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA sections 182(b)(2)). The EKAPCD and the YSAQMD regulate ozone areas classified as Marginal Nonattainment and Severe Nonattainment respectively for the federal 8-hour 2008 Ozone Standard. 40 CFR 81.305. The TSDs have more information about these requirements as they relate to the submitted rules. Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992). 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised January 11, 1990). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001). 4. Control Techniques Guidelines, ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations'' (EPA- 453/R-96-007, April 1996). 5. Control Techniques Guidelines, ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings'' (EPA-453/R-06-004, September 2006). 6. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter C, Part 51, Subpart F, Section 51.100, ``Definitions'' (40 CFR 51.100). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, stringency and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation. C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rules but which are not currently the basis for rule disapproval. D. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by July 18, 2016, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on August 15, 2016. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the EKAPCD and YSAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible [[Page 39213]] methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 15, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: May 3, 2016. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(3), (c)(447)(i)(D)(4), and (c)(472) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (442) * * * (i) * * * (F) * * * (3) Previously approved on April 28, 2015 in paragraph (442)(i)(F)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in (472)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1.1, ``General Provisions and Definitions,'' revised on May 8, 2013. * * * * * (447) * * * (i) * * * (D) * * * (4) Rule 410.9, ``Wood Products Surface Coating Operations,'' adopted on March 13, 2014. * * * * * (472) New and amended regulations were submitted on November 13, 2015, by the Governor's designee. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District. (1) Rule 1.1, General Provisions and Definitions, revised July 8, 2015. [FR Doc. 2016-14098 Filed 6-15-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 39211
Applicable
Name of non-regulatory State
geographic EPA approval date Additional explanation
SIP revision submittal date
area
* * * * * * *
Section 110(a)(2) Infra- Statewide ....... 7/16/15 6/16/16, [Insert Federal Docket #2015–0838. This action addresses the fol-
structure Requirements Register citation]. lowing CAA elements, or portions thereof:
for the 2012 Particulate 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)(PSD), (D)(ii), (E),
Matter NAAQS. (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2016–14181 Filed 6–15–16; 8:45 am] DATES: This rule is effective on August FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 15, 2016 without further notice, unless For the full EPA public comment policy,
the EPA receives adverse comments by information about CBI or multimedia
July 18, 2016. If we receive such submissions, and general guidance on
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION comments, we will publish a timely making effective comments, please visit
AGENCY withdrawal in the Federal Register to http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
notify the public that this direct final commenting-epa-dockets.
40 CFR Part 52 rule will not take effect. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0124; FRL–9946–38– identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
Region 9] OAR–2016–0124 at http://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Approval of California Air Plan Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Control District and Yolo-Solano Air online instructions for submitting Table of Contents
Quality Management District comments. Once submitted, comments
I. The State’s Submittal
cannot be edited or removed from
AGENCY: Environmental Protection A. What rules did the State submit?
Regulations.gov. For either manner of B. Are there other versions of these rules?
Agency (EPA).
submission, the EPA may publish any C. What is the purpose of the submitted
ACTION: Direct final rule. comment received to its public docket. rule and rule revision?
Do not submit electronically any II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection information you consider to be A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final Confidential Business Information (CBI) B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
action to approve revisions to the Yolo- or other information whose disclosure is criteria?
Solano Air Quality Management District restricted by statute. Multimedia C. EPA Recommendations To Further
(YSAQMD) and Eastern Kern Air submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Improve the Rules
Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) D. Public Comment and Final Action
accompanied by a written comment.
III. Incorporation by Reference
portions of the California State The written comment is considered the IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Implementation Plan (SIP). These official comment and should include
revisions concern, respectively, the discussion of all points you wish to I. The State’s Submittal
definition of volatile organic make. The EPA will generally not A. What rules did the State submit?
compounds (VOCs), and emissions of consider comments or comment
VOCs from the surface coating contents located outside of the primary Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
operations of wood products. We are submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or this action with the dates that they were
approving local rules that regulate these other file sharing system). For adopted by the local air agencies and
emission sources under the Clean Air additional submission methods, please submitted by the California Air
Act (CAA or the Act). contact the person identified in the FOR Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Adopted/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended/ Submitted
revised
EKAPCD ......... 410.9 Wood Products Surface Coating Operations ................................................. 3/13/2014 7/25/2014
YSAQMD ........ 1.1 General Provisions and Definitions ................................................................ 7/08/2015 11/13/2015
On September 11, 2014, and January B. Are there other versions of these C. What is the purpose of the submitted
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
19, 2016, the EPA determined that the rules? rule and rule revision?
submittals for EKAPCD Rule 410.9 and
YSAQMD Rule 1.1 respectively met the There are no previous versions of VOCs help produce ground-level
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Rule 410.9 in the SIP. We approved an ozone, smog and PM, which harm
Appendix V, which must be met before earlier version of Rule 1.1 into the SIP human health and the environment.
formal EPA review. on April 28, 2015 (80 FR 23449). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Jun 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM 16JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_39327/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 39213
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Dated: May 3, 2016. ACTION: Notice of decision on petition.
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Jared Blumenfeld,
In addition, the SIP is not approved SUMMARY: NMFS announces its decision
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
to apply on any Indian reservation land on a petition for rulemaking submitted
or in any other area where the EPA or Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code by the Center for Biological Diversity
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a of Federal Regulations is amended as (CBD). In their petition, CBD requested
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of follows: that NMFS implement additional
Indian country, the rule does not have domestic regulations to address the
PART 52—[AMENDED] relative impacts of the U.S. fleet on the
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal Pacific bluefin tuna (PBF) stock, which
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 is overfished and subject to overfishing.
governments or preempt tribal law as continues to read as follows:
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Outside of the scope of their petition for
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. rulemaking, CBD also requested that
The Congressional Review Act, 5 NMFS develop recommendations for
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Subpart F—California international fishery management
Business Regulatory Enforcement ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by organizations to take actions to end
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(3), overfishing of PBF. In light of public
that before a rule may take effect, the (c)(447)(i)(D)(4), and (c)(472) to read as comments, NMFS is responding to each
agency promulgating the rule must follows: element of the petition but referring the
submit a rule report, which includes a specific requests for rulemaking under
copy of the rule, to each House of the § 52.220 Identification of plan. the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Congress and to the Comptroller General * * * * * Conservation and Management Act
of the United States. The EPA will (c) * * * (MSA) to the Pacific Fishery
submit a report containing this action (442) * * * Management Council (Pacific Council)
and other required information to the (i) * * * for further consideration. The decision
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of (F) * * * was made on June 9, 2016.
Representatives, and the Comptroller (3) Previously approved on April 28, DATES: June 16, 2016.
General of the United States prior to 2015 in paragraph (442)(i)(F)(1) of this FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
publication of the rule in the Federal section and now deleted with Heidi Taylor, NMFS, 562–980–4039.
Register. A major rule cannot take effect replacement in (472)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1.1, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
until 60 days after it is published in the ‘‘General Provisions and Definitions,’’ received a letter from CBD, an
Federal Register. This action is not a revised on May 8, 2013. environmental non-governmental
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. * * * * * organization, on April 9, 2014. In the
804(2). (447) * * * letter, CBD asserted that PBF (Thunnus
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean (i) * * * orientalis) are not adequately protected
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of under the Fishery Management Plan for
(D) * * *
this action must be filed in the United U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
(4) Rule 410.9, ‘‘Wood Products
States Court of Appeals for the Migratory Species (HMS FMP) and that
Surface Coating Operations,’’ adopted
appropriate circuit by August 15, 2016. the Pacific Council failed to meet its
on March 13, 2014.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by statutory duty to develop
the Administrator of this final rule does * * * * *
recommendations for domestic
not affect the finality of this action for (472) New and amended regulations
regulations in response to NMFS’
the purposes of judicial review nor does were submitted on November 13, 2015,
determination that the PBF stock is
it extend the time within which a by the Governor’s designee.
overfished and subject to overfishing (78
petition for judicial review may be filed, (i) Incorporation by reference.
FR 41033, July 9, 2013). Specifically,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness (A) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
CBD petitioned NMFS to amend the
of such rule or action. Parties with Management District.
HMS FMP or initiate a rulemaking
objections to this direct final rule are (1) Rule 1.1, General Provisions and
under the authority of the MSA, 16
encouraged to file a comment in Definitions, revised July 8, 2015.
U.S.C. 1801 et seq., to include PBF as
response to the parallel notice of [FR Doc. 2016–14098 Filed 6–15–16; 8:45 am] a prohibited species until the stock is
proposed rulemaking for this action BILLING CODE 6560–50–P rebuilt, thereby placing a moratorium on
published in the Proposed Rules section retention of PBF by U.S. fishing vessels.
of today’s Federal Register, rather than As an alternative, CBD proposed that
file an immediate petition for judicial DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NMFS establish annual catch limits and
review of this direct final rule, so that a permanent minimum size requirement
the EPA can withdraw this direct final National Oceanic and Atmospheric to protect PBF of age classes 1 and 2 and
rule and address the comment in the Administration that NMFS amend the HMS FMP to
proposed rulemaking. This action may establish specific reference points for
not be challenged later in proceedings to 50 CFR Part 660 PBF to guide science-based management
enforce its requirements (see section RIN 0648–XD344 of the stock. Outside of the scope of the
307(b)(2)). petition for rulemaking, CBD requested
Pacific Bluefin Tuna in the Eastern that NMFS develop recommendations to
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Pacific Ocean; Response to Petition the Secretary of State and Congress to
Environmental protection, Air for Rulemaking end PBF overfishing at the international
pollution control, Incorporation by level.
reference, Intergovernmental relations, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Public Input on the Petition
and recordkeeping requirements, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NMFS published a Federal Register
Volatile organic compounds. Commerce. document on July 24, 2014 (79 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Jun 15, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM 16JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_39327/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-16 00:37:18
Document Modified: 2016-06-16 00:37:18
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on August 15, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 18, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3024, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 39211 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR