81 FR 46051 - Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination and Notice of Second Amended Final Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 136 (July 15, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 136 (July 15, 2016)
| Page Range | 46051-46053 | |
| FR Document | 2016-16803 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 46051-46053] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-16803] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-830] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination and Notice of Second Amended Final Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 22, 2014, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) entered its final judgment in Deacero III,\1\ sustaining the Department of Commerce's (the Department) negative circumvention determination from the First Remand Results as it relates to the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico.\2\ Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Timken,\3\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\4\ the Department issued the Amended Final Determination \5\ notifying the public that the final judgment of the CIT in this case was not in harmony with the Department's finding in the Final Determination.\6\ In the Amended Final Determination, the Department found, under protest, that, pursuant to section 781(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.225, Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 millimeters (mm) to 5.00 mm (also referred to in this notice as small diameter wire rod) did not constitute circumvention of the Order. On April 5, 2016, the Federal Circuit reversed the CIT's holding in Deacero III.\7\ In its holding, the Federal Circuit reinstated the Department's original finding from the Final Determination that Deacero's shipments of small diameter wire rod to the United States constitute a minor alteration circumvention of the Order.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero USA, Inc. v. United States and Arcelormittal USA LLC, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel, and Nucor Corporation, Court No. 12-00345, Slip Op. 14-151 (December 22, 2014) (Deacero III). \2\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Deacero S.A. de C.V. and Deacero USA Inc. v. United States and Arcelormittal USA LLC, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel, and Nucor Corporation, Court No. 12-00345; Slip Op. 13-126 (CIT 2013) (January 29, 2014) (First Remand Results); Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) (Order). \3\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). \4\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). \5\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 80 FR 44326 (July 27, 2015) (Amended Final Determination). \6\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 59892 (October 1, 2012) (Final Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Final Decision Memorandum). \7\ See Deacero S.A.de C.V. v. United States, 817 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Deacero IV). \8\ Id. at 12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective April 15, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric B. Greynolds, or James Terpstra. AD/ [[Page 46052]] CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 6071, (202) 482-3965, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 1, 2012, the Department issued the Final Determination in which it determined that Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm constitute a minor alteration circumvention of the Order.\9\ Deacero challenged the Department's determination. Upon review, the CIT remanded the Final Determination, holding that the Department improperly determined that Deacero's entries of small diameter wire rod were inside the scope of the Order despite the fact that small diameter wire rod was commercially available before the investigation and Petitioners \10\ ``consciously chose to limit the Order's reach to certain steel products 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm in solid cross-sectional diameter.'' \11\ On remand, based on the Court's reasoning, the Department found that there was no alternative but to change the results of the anti- circumvention determination and find that Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm were not within the scope of the Order.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Final Determination, 77 FR at 59893. \10\ Petitioners are ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc, Rocky Mountain Steel, Members of the Wire Rod Producers Coalition and Nucor Corporation (Nucor). \11\ See Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, 37 CIT, 942 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 1324-25 (September 20, 2013) (Deacero I); Deacero Remand, Slip Op. 13-126 at 15. \12\ See First Remand Results at 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Deacero II, the Court held that although the Department ultimately reached a supportable result in the First Remand Results, remand was nonetheless necessary because the Department arrived at the result by misinterpreting Deacero I.\13\ Therefore, in Deacero II, the Court instructed the Department to explain whether it seeks the Court's leave to revisit the issue of commercial availability.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. v. United States, Slip Op. 14- 99, 2014 WL 4244349, * 1-3 (August 28, 2014) (Deacero II) at 11-12. \14\ Id. at 12. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the Second Remand Results, the Department continued to respectfully disagree with the Court that the ``commercial availability'' of a product in the country in question, in a third country or in the United States bars the Department from reaching an affirmative anti-circumvention determination under the minor alteration provision of the statute.\15\ For these same reasons, the Department did not request a remand to further consider ``commercial availability'' in the context of this minor alteration proceeding. On December 22, 2014, the CIT entered final judgment sustaining the First Remand Results.\16\ Accordingly, July 27, 2015, the Department issued the Amended Final Determination in which it found that Deacero's entries of small diameter wire rod were not circumventing the Order and, thus, were not subject to antidumping (AD) duties.\17\ In the Amended Final Determination, the Department indicated that it would instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise, but set the cash deposit rate for Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm up to 5.00 mm to zero pending a final and conclusive court decision.\18\ Further, in the Amended Final Determination, the Department stated that for any AD duties which were deposited for Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm up to 5.00 mm entered from January 1, 2015, to July 27, 2015, the publication date of the Amended Final Determination, the Department would instruct CBP to refund the cash deposit upon request but continue to suspend the entries at a zero cash deposit rate.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Deacero S.A. de C.V. et al., v. United States, Court No. 12-00345; Slip Op. 14-99 (CIT August 28, 2014) (Second Remand Results). \16\ See Deacero III. \17\ See Amended Final Determination, 80 FR at 44327. \18\ Id. \19\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In Deacero IV, the Federal Circuit held that in reversing the Department's affirmative circumvention finding in the Final Determination, the CIT erred in its interpretation of case precedent.\20\ The Federal Circuit found that the CIT incorrectly interpreted Wheatland to mean that an article cannot be subject to an anti-circumvention inquiry if that article is not expressly included within the literal terms of the order. Specifically, the Federal Circuit reasoned that where Wheatland held that a minor alternation inquiry is inappropriate when an order expressly excludes the allegedly altered product, the order at issue contains no explicit exclusion of steel wire rod with a diameter that is less than 5.00 mm.\21\ The Federal Circuit also held that substantial evidence supports the Department's determination that small-diameter steel wire rod was not commercially available prior to the Order, notwithstanding that some small-diameter steel wire rod was in existence at some prior time in non-investigated countries.\22\ Accordingly, the Federal Circuit held that the Department's initial finding in the Final Determination that Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm constitute a circumventing minor alteration of the Order was in accordance with law and supported by substantial evidence.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See Deacero IV, 817 F.3d at 1337-39, citing to Deacero I, 942 F. Supp. 2d at 1328-1332 quoting Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1365, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (Wheatland). \21\ See Deacero IV, 817 F.3d at 1338. \22\ Id. at 1339. \23\ Id. at 1339. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timken Notice In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, the Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Federal Circuit's judgement in Deacero IV sustaining the Department's original finding in the Final Determination that Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm constitute a minor alteration circumvention of the Order constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with the Department's negative circumvention finding in the First Remand Results and Amended Final Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Determination Because there is now a final court decision, we are amending the Amended Final Determination with respect to Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm. Based on the Federal Circuit's holding in Deacero IV, Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm are covered by the scope of the Order and, thus, subject to AD duties. Accordingly, the Department will instruct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation of the subject merchandise and, as of January 1, 2015, the effective date for the Amended Final Determination giving effect to the CIT's since-reversed final judgment, to set the cash deposit rate for Deacero's entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 [[Page 46053]] mm to 5.00 mm to the applicable cash deposit rate as determined in administrative reviews.\24\ Specifically, for entries of small diameter wire rod from Deacero that entered the United States on or after January 1, 2015, whose entries were suspended at a zero cash deposit rate subject to the Amended Final Determination, we will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits at the following rates: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ As of January 1, 2015, the cash deposit rate applicable to Deacero's entries of subject merchandise was 12.08 percent, as established in Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Administrative Review: 2010-2011, 78 FR 28190, 28191 (May 14, 2013) (10/11 Final Results). Deacero's cash deposit rate was subsequently revised to zero percent in Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Administrative Review: 2012-2013, 80 FR 35626, 35627 (June 22, 2015) (12/13 Amended Final Results), and 1.13 percent in Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Administrative Review: 2013-2014, 81 FR 41521, 41522 (June 27, 2016) (13/14 Amended Final Results.). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Applicable On or after Before cash deposit rate ------------------------------------------------------------------------ January 1, 2015................... June 22, 2015....... \25\ 12.08 June 22, 2015..................... May 19, 2016........ \26\ 0.00 May 19, 2016...................... .................... \27\ 1.13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Additionally, with regard to any of Deacero's unliquidated entries of wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm for which an administrative review has been completed, we will instruct CBP to assess AD duties at the applicable rates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See 10/11 Final Results, 78 FR at 28191. \26\ See 12/13 Amended Final Results, 80 FR at 35627. \27\ See 13/14 Amended Final Results, 81 FR at 41522. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 8, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-16803 Filed 7-14-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2016 / Notices 46051
briefs may be filed no later than five Cash Deposit Requirements Trade (CIT) entered its final judgment in
days after the briefs are filed. All Effective upon publication of the final Deacero III,1 sustaining the Department
rebuttal comments must be limited to rescission or the final results of this of Commerce’s (the Department)
comments raised in the case briefs.9 NSR, the Department will instruct CBP negative circumvention determination
Interested parties who wish to request to discontinue the option of posting a from the First Remand Results as it
a hearing must submit a written request bond or security in lieu of a cash relates to the antidumping duty order on
to the Assistant Secretary for deposit for entries of Durum’s subject carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod
Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. merchandise. If the Department from Mexico.2 Consistent with the
Department of Commerce, within 30 proceeds to a final rescission of this decision of the United States Court of
days after the date of publication of this NSR, Durum’s cash deposit rate will Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal
notice.10 Requests should contain the continue to be the all-others rate. If the Circuit) in Timken,3 as clarified by
party’s name, address, and telephone Department issues final results for this Diamond Sawblades,4 the Department
number, the number of participants, and NSR, the Department will instruct CBP issued the Amended Final
a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral to collect cash deposits, effective upon Determination 5 notifying the public that
argument presentations will be limited the publication of the final results, at the final judgment of the CIT in this
to issues raised in the briefs. If a request the rates established therein. case was not in harmony with the
for a hearing is made, the Department Department’s finding in the Final
Notification to Importers Determination.6 In the Amended Final
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
This notice also serves as a Determination, the Department found,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
preliminary reminder to importers of under protest, that, pursuant to section
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
their responsibility under 19 CFR 781(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.225,
time to be determined.11 Parties should
regarding the reimbursement of Deacero’s entries of wire rod with an
confirm by telephone the date, time, and
antidumping duties prior to liquidation actual diameter of 4.75 millimeters
location of the hearing two days before
of the relevant entries during this (mm) to 5.00 mm (also referred to in this
the scheduled date.
review period. Failure to comply with notice as small diameter wire rod) did
All submissions, with limited this requirement could result in the not constitute circumvention of the
exceptions, must be filed electronically Department’s presumption that Order. On April 5, 2016, the Federal
using ACCESS. An electronically filed reimbursement of antidumping duties Circuit reversed the CIT’s holding in
document must be received successfully occurred and the subsequent assessment Deacero III.7 In its holding, the Federal
in its entirety by the Department’s of double antidumping duties. Circuit reinstated the Department’s
electronic records system, ACCESS, by We are issuing and publishing these original finding from the Final
5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due results in accordance with sections Determination that Deacero’s shipments
date. Documents excepted from the 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. of small diameter wire rod to the United
electronic submission requirements States constitute a minor alteration
Dated: June 28, 2016.
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper circumvention of the Order.8
form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Paul Piquado,
DATES: Effective April 15, 2016.
Room 18022, and stamped with the date Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the B. Greynolds, or James Terpstra. AD/
due date.12 Appendix I
The Department intends to issue the 1 See Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero USA,
final results of this NSR, which will List of Sections in the Preliminary Decision Inc. v. United States and Arcelormittal USA LLC,
Memorandum Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Evraz Rocky Mountain
include the results of its analysis of Steel, and Nucor Corporation, Court No. 12–00345,
issues raised in any briefs received, no 1. Summary Slip Op. 14–151 (December 22, 2014) (Deacero III).
later than 90 days after the date these 2. Background 2 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
3. Scope of the Order to Deacero S.A. de C.V. and Deacero USA Inc. v.
preliminary results of review are issued 4. Discussion of the Methodology United States and Arcelormittal USA LLC, Gerdau
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 5. Conclusion Ameristeel U.S. Inc., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel,
Act. and Nucor Corporation, Court No. 12–00345; Slip
[FR Doc. 2016–16694 Filed 7–14–16; 8:45 am] Op. 13–126 (CIT 2013) (January 29, 2014) (First
Assessment Rates BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Remand Results); Notice of Antidumping Duty
Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
If the Department proceeds to a final from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad
rescission of Durum’s NSR, the and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29,
assessment rate to which Durum’s DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2002) (Order).
3 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
shipments will be subject will not be International Trade Administration (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
affected by this review. If the 4 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
Department does not proceed to a final [A–201–830] United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
rescission of this new shipper review, (Diamond Sawblades).
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 5 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
Rod From Mexico: Notice of Court From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in
will calculate importer-specific (or Harmony With Final Results and Notice of
customer-specific) assessment rates Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination, 80 FR 44326 (July
based on the final results of this review. Amended Final Determination and 27, 2015) (Amended Final Determination).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Second Amended Final 6 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
9 See
Determination From Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of
19 CFR 351.309(d). Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, FR 59892 (October 1, 2012) (Final Determination)
11 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
International Trade Administration, and accompanying Issues and Decision
12 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Memorandum (Final Decision Memorandum).
Department of Commerce. 7 See Deacero S.A.de C.V. v. United States, 817
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR SUMMARY: On December 22, 2014, the F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Deacero IV).
39263 (July 6, 2011). United States Court of International 8 Id. at 12.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Jul 14, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_46187/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 136 / Friday, July 15, 2016 / Notices 46053
mm to 5.00 mm to the applicable cash from Deacero that entered the United Final Determination, we will instruct
deposit rate as determined in States on or after January 1, 2015, whose CBP to collect cash deposits at the
administrative reviews.24 Specifically, entries were suspended at a zero cash following rates:
for entries of small diameter wire rod deposit rate subject to the Amended
Applicable
On or after Before cash deposit
rate
January 1, 2015 .......................................................................... June 22, 2015 ............................................................................ 25 12.08
June 22, 2015 ............................................................................. May 19, 2016 ............................................................................. 26 0.00
May 19, 2016 .............................................................................. ..................................................................................................... 27 1.13
Additionally, with regard to any of meeting will support detailed August 23, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. until
Deacero’s unliquidated entries of wire recommendations to strengthen 5:00 p.m. Central Time. All sessions
rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm cybersecurity in both the public and will be open to the public. The
to 5.00 mm for which an administrative private sectors while protecting privacy, Commission is authorized by Executive
review has been completed, we will ensuring public safety and economic Order 13718, Commission on Enhancing
instruct CBP to assess AD duties at the and national security, fostering National Cybersecurity.1 The
applicable rates. discovery and development of new Commission was established by the
technical solutions, and bolstering President and will make detailed
Notification to Interested Parties
partnerships between Federal, State, recommendations to strengthen
This notice is issued and published in local, tribal and territorial governments cybersecurity in both the public and
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), and the private sector in the private sectors while protecting privacy,
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. development, promotion, and use of ensuring public safety and economic
Dated: July 8, 2016. cybersecurity technologies, policies, and and national security, fostering
Paul Piquado, best practices. All sessions will be open discovery and development of new
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and to the public. technical solutions, and bolstering
Compliance. DATES: The meeting will be held on partnerships between Federal, state,
[FR Doc. 2016–16803 Filed 7–14–16; 8:45 am] Tuesday, August 23, 2016, from 9:00 local, tribal and territorial governments
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Central Time. and the private sector in the
development, promotion, and use of
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
cybersecurity technologies, policies, and
the University of Minnesota’s TCF Bank
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE best practices.
Stadium-DQ Club Room, 3rd Level, The agenda is expected to include the
located at 420 SE 23rd Avenue, following items:
National Institute of Standards and
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. The
Technology —Introductions.
meeting is open to the public and
—Panel discussion on the challenges
Open Meeting of the Commission on interested parties are requested to
confronting the consumers in the
Enhancing National Cybersecurity contact Sara Kerman at the contact
digital economy.
information indicated in the FOR
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards —Panel discussion on innovation
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
and Technology, Commerce. (Internet of Things, healthcare, and
this notice in advance of the meeting for
ACTION: Notice.
other areas).
building entrance requirements. —Panel discussion on assured products
SUMMARY: The Commission on FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara and services.
Enhancing National Cybersecurity will Kerman, Information Technology —Conclusion.
meet Tuesday, August 23, 2016, from Laboratory, National Institute of Note that agenda items may change
9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Central Time Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau without notice. The final agenda will be
at the University of Minnesota’s TCF Drive, Stop 2000, Gaithersburg, MD posted on http://www.nist.gov/
Bank Stadium-DQ Club Room. The 20899–8900, telephone: 301–975–4634, cybercommission. Seating will be
primary purpose of the meeting is to or by email at: eo-commission@nist.gov. available for the public and media. No
discuss the challenges and Please use subject line ‘‘Open Meeting of registration is required to attend this
opportunities for organizations and the Commission on Enhancing National meeting; however, on-site attendees are
consumers in securing the digital Cybersecurity—MN’’. asked to voluntarily sign in and space
economy. In particular, the meeting will SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant will be available on a first-come, first-
address: (1) Challenges confronting to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, served basis.
consumers in the digital economy; (2) as amended, 5 U.S.C. App., notice is Public Participation: The Commission
innovation (Internet of Things, hereby given that the Commission on agenda will include a period of time,
healthcare, and other areas); and (3) Enhancing National Cybersecurity (‘‘the not to exceed fifteen minutes, for oral
assured products and services. The Commission’’) will meet Tuesday, comments from the public on Tuesday,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
24 As of January 1, 2015, the cash deposit rate Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final 25 See 10/11 Final Results, 78 FR at 28191.
applicable to Deacero’s entries of subject Results of Administrative Review: 2012–2013, 80 FR 26 See 12/13 Amended Final Results, 80 FR at
merchandise was 12.08 percent, as established in 35626, 35627 (June 22, 2015) (12/13 Amended Final 35627.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Results), and 1.13 percent in Carbon and Certain 27 See 13/14 Amended Final Results, 81 FR at
Mexico: Final Results of Administrative Review: Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Amended Final 41522.
2010–2011, 78 FR 28190, 28191 (May 14, 2013) (10/ Results of Administrative Review: 2013–2014, 81 FR 1 https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/
11 Final Results). Deacero’s cash deposit rate was 41521, 41522 (June 27, 2016) (13/14 Amended Final 02/12/2016-03038/commission-on-enhancing-
subsequently revised to zero percent in Carbon and Results.). national-cybersecurity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:03 Jul 14, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_46187/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-15 02:53:01
Document Modified: 2016-07-15 02:53:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective April 15, 2016. | |
| Contact | Eric B. Greynolds, or James Terpstra. AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 6071, (202) 482-3965, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 46051 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR