81 FR 46836 - Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions to Permits, Rules and Approval Orders; Utah
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 138 (July 19, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 138 (July 19, 2016)
| Page Range | 46836-46838 | |
| FR Document | 2016-16963 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 46836-46838] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-16963] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0221; FRL-9948-89-Region 8] Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions to Permits, Rules and Approval Orders; Utah AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Utah on February 10, 2012 and August 29, 2014. These submittals request SIP revisions to remove changes to the major source baseline date that were disapproved by the EPA on July 15, 2011. The submittals also address the EPA's February 6, 2014 disapproval of several permit rules related to the public availability of good engineering practice stack height demonstrations in the public comment process for an approval order, and the process for making emission reductions enforceable in an approval order. The EPA is taking this action in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 18, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08- OAR-2016-0221, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-7814, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? The EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revisions if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. II. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA? A. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA through www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to:Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. [[Page 46837]] Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. III. Analysis of the State Submittals Utah's February 10, 2012 submittal removes changes to the major source baseline date that were disapproved by the EPA on July 15, 2011. The EPA disapproved R307-405-3(3)(a)(i) because it defined ``Major Source Baseline Date'' in a manner inconsistent with the federal definition found at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(14). The EPA approves these revisions. The August 29, 2014 SIP revisions address the EPA's February 6, 2014 disapproval of R307-410-2, Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis, Definitions; R307-410-6, Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis, Stack Heights and Dispersion Techniques; and R307-401-12, Permit: New and Modified Sources, Reduction in Air Contaminants. The submittal also amends R307-410-2 to incorporate by reference the date of the Code of Federal Regulations referenced in R307-101-3. The EPA approves these revisions. The submittal amends R307-410-6 to require the director to notify the public of the availability of a demonstration that the source stack height meets good engineering practice, and to provide an opportunity for public hearing on it as required by 40 CFR 51.164. This conforms to what is required by R307-401-7, Public Notice, and the EPA approves this revision. Finally, the submittal amends R307-401-12 to exempt an owner or operator of a stationary source of air contaminants that reduces or eliminates air contaminants from the requirement to submit a notice of intent and obtain an approval order prior to construction if certain conditions are met. Those conditions are: a) the project does not increase the potential to emit of any air contaminant or cause emissions of any new air contaminant; and b) the director is notified of the change and the reduction of air contaminants is made enforceable through an approval order in accordance with the notification requirements of R307-401-12. The EPA approves these revisions. IV. What action is the EPA taking today? The EPA is taking direct final action to approve the SIP revisions submitted by the State of Utah on February 10, 2012 and August 29, 2014. The EPA is approving the proposed SIP revisions as a direct final action without prior proposal because the agency views the revisions as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register publication, the EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revisions if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective September 19, 2016 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by August 18, 2016. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Utah rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this direct final action merely approves a state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact in a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a [[Page 46838]] copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: June 22, 2016. Shaun L. McGrath, Regional Administrator, Region 8. 40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart TT--Utah 0 2. Section 52.2320 paragraph (c) is amended by: 0 a. In the table, under the heading ``R307-401, Permit: New and Modified Sources'', adding in numerical order, a table entry for ``R307-401- 12''; 0 b. In the table, under the heading ``R307-405. Permits: Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD)'' revising the table entry for ``R307-405-03''; and 0 c. In the table, under the heading ``R307-410. Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis'', revising the table entries for ``R307-410-02'' and ``R307-410-06''. The revisions and addition read as follows: Sec. 52.2320 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Rule No. Rule title effective date Final rule citation, date Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources * * * * * * * R307-401- Reduction in Air 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert Federal ............................. 12 Contaminants. Register citation]. * * * * * * * R307-405. Permits: Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD) * * * * * * * R307-405- Definitions............... 02/02/2012 7/19/2016. [Insert Federal ............................. 03 Register citation]. * * * * * * * R307-410. Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis * * * * * * * R307-410- Definitions............... 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert Federal ............................. 02 Register citation]. * * * * * * * R307-410- Stack Heights and 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert Federal ............................. 06 Dispersion Techniques. Register citation]. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-16963 Filed 7-18-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![46836 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
minutes prior to the beginning, during, were disapproved by the EPA on July Register, we are publishing a separate
and thirty minutes following the 15, 2011. The submittals also address document that will serve as the
conclusion of the Parade of Ships. The the EPA’s February 6, 2014 disapproval proposed rule to approve the SIP
Captain of the Port may be assisted by of several permit rules related to the revisions if adverse comments are
other federal, state, or local agencies as public availability of good engineering received on this direct final rule. We
needed. practice stack height demonstrations in will not institute a second comment
In order to transit through this safety the public comment process for an period on this action. Any parties
zone, authorization must be granted by approval order, and the process for interested in commenting must do so at
the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or making emission reductions enforceable this time. For further information about
his designated representative. All vessel in an approval order. The EPA is taking commenting on this rule, see the
operators desiring entry into this safety this action in accordance with section ADDRESSES section of this document.
zone shall gain authorization by 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). If the EPA receives adverse comment,
contacting either the on-scene patrol DATES: This rule is effective on we will publish a timely withdrawal in
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16, or Coast September 19, 2016 without further the Federal Register informing the
Guard Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor notice, unless EPA receives adverse public that this direct final rule will not
Operations Center (JHOC) via telephone comments by August 18, 2016. If take effect. We would address all public
at (206) 217–6002. Vessel operators adverse comments are received, the EPA comments in any subsequent final rule
granted permission to enter this safety will publish a timely withdrawal of the based on the proposed rule.
zone will be escorted by the on-scene direct final rule in the Federal Register II. What should I consider as I prepare
patrol until no longer within the safety informing the public that the rule will my comments for the EPA?
zone. not take effect.
This document is issued under ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
A. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
authority of 33 CFR 165.1330 and 5 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– information to the EPA through
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice OAR–2016–0221, at http:// www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
of enforcement in the Federal Register, www.regulations.gov. Follow the online mark the part or all of the information
the Coast Guard will provide the instructions for submitting comments. that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
maritime community with advanced Once submitted, comments cannot be information in a disk or CD ROM that
notification of the safety zone via the edited or removed from Regulations.gov. you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
Local Notice to Mariners and marine The EPA may publish any comment disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
information broadcasts. If the Captain of received to its public docket. Do not identify electronically within the disk or
the Port determines that the regulated submit electronically any information CD ROM the specific information that is
area need not be enforced for the full you consider to be Confidential claimed as CBI). In addition to one
duration stated in this notice of Business Information (CBI) or other complete version of the comment that
enforcement, he may use a Broadcast information whose disclosure is includes information claimed as CBI, a
Notice to Mariners to grant general restricted by statute. Multimedia copy of the comment that does not
permission to enter the regulated area. submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be contain the information claimed as CBI
accompanied by a written comment. must be submitted for inclusion in the
Dated: July 13, 2016.
The written comment is considered the public docket. Information so marked
M.W. Raymond, will not be disclosed except in
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to accordance with procedures set forth in
Port, Puget Sound. 40 CFR part 2.
[FR Doc. 2016–16979 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am] make. The EPA will generally not
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
consider comments or comment
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P When submitting comments, remember
contents located outside of the primary
to:
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
other file sharing system). For
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION number and other identifying
additional submission methods, the full
AGENCY information (subject heading, Federal
EPA public comment policy,
Register date and page number).
40 CFR Part 52 information about CBI or multimedia • Follow directions—The agency may
submissions, and general guidance on ask you to respond to specific questions
[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0221; FRL–9948–89- making effective comments, please visit
Region 8] or organize comments by referencing a
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
commenting-epa-dockets. or section number.
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plan Revisions to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody • Explain why you agree or disagree;
Permits, Rules and Approval Orders; Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S. suggest alternatives and substitute
Utah Environmental Protection Agency language for your requested changes.
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR, • Describe any assumptions and
AGENCY: Environmental Protection 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado provide any technical information and/
Agency. 80202–1129, (303) 312–7814, or data that you used.
ACTION: Direct final rule. ostendorf.jody@epa.gov. • If you estimate potential costs or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: burdens, explain how you arrived at
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection your estimate in sufficient detail to
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
allow for it to be reproduced.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
action to approve State Implementation The EPA is publishing this rule • Provide specific examples to
Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the without a prior proposed rule because illustrate your concerns, and suggest
State of Utah on February 10, 2012 and we view this as a noncontroversial alternatives.
August 29, 2014. These submittals action and anticipate no adverse • Explain your views as clearly as
request SIP revisions to remove changes comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed possible, avoiding the use of profanity
to the major source baseline date that Rules’’ section of today’s Federal or personal threats.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:36 Jul 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM 19JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_46974/page/1.svg)
![46838 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
copy of the rule, to each House of the action published in the proposed rules PART 52—APPROVAL AND
Congress and to the Comptroller General section of today’s Federal Register, PROMULGATION OF
of the United States. The EPA will rather than file an immediate petition IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
submit a report containing this rule and for judicial review of this direct final
other required information to the U.S. rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this 1. The authority citation for Part 52
Senate, the U.S. House of direct final rule and address the continues to read as follows:
Representatives, and the Comptroller comment in the proposed rulemaking. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
General of the United States prior to This action may not be challenged later
publication of the rule in the Federal in proceedings to enforce its Subpart TT—Utah
Register. A major rule cannot take effect requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
until 60 days after it is published in the ■ 2. Section 52.2320 paragraph (c) is
Federal Register. This action is not a List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 amended by:
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. ■ a. In the table, under the heading
804(2). Environmental protection, Air ‘‘R307–401, Permit: New and Modified
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Sources’’, adding in numerical order, a
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of Incorporation by reference, table entry for ‘‘R307–401–12’’;
this action must be filed in the United Intergovernmental relations, Lead, ■ b. In the table, under the heading
States Court of Appeals for the Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate ‘‘R307–405. Permits: Major Sources in
appropriate circuit by September 19, matter, Reporting and recordkeeping Attainment or Unclassified Areas
2016. Filing a petition for requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile (PSD)’’ revising the table entry for
reconsideration by the Administrator of organic compounds. ‘‘R307–405–03’’; and
this final rule does not affect the finality ■ c. In the table, under the heading
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
of this action for the purposes of judicial ‘‘R307–410. Permits: Emissions Impact
review nor does it extend the time Dated: June 22, 2016. Analysis’’, revising the table entries for
within which a petition for judicial Shaun L. McGrath, ‘‘R307–410–02’’ and ‘‘R307–410–06’’.
review may be filed, and shall not Regional Administrator, Region 8. The revisions and addition read as
postpone the effectiveness of such rule follows:
or action. Parties with objections to this 40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
direct final rule are encouraged to file a § 52.2320 Identification of plan.
follows:
comment in response to the parallel * * * * *
notice of proposed rulemaking for this (c) * * *
State effective
Rule No. Rule title Final rule citation, date Comments
date
* * * * * * *
R307–401. Permit: New and Modified Sources
* * * * * * *
R307– Reduction in Air Contaminants ......................... 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation]
401–12
* * * * * * *
R307–405. Permits: Major Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas (PSD)
* * * * * * *
R307– Definitions ......................................................... 02/02/2012 7/19/2016. [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation]
405–03
* * * * * * *
R307–410. Permits: Emissions Impact Analysis
* * * * * * *
R307– Definitions ......................................................... 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation]
410–02
* * * * * * *
R307– Stack Heights and Dispersion Techniques ...... 08/07/2014 7/19/2016. [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation]
410–06
* * * * * * *
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016–16963 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Jul 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JYR1.SGM 19JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_46974/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-19 01:11:00
Document Modified: 2016-07-19 01:11:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 18, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-7814, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 46836 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR