81 FR 46866 - Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Regional Haze 5-Year Report
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 138 (July 19, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 138 (July 19, 2016)
| Page Range | 46866-46870 | |
| FR Document | 2016-17063 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 46866-46870] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-17063] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2014-0909; FRL-9949-15-Region 1] Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Regional Haze 5-Year Report ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Hampshire on December 16, 2014. New Hampshire's SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established for regional haze and a determination of the adequacy of the State's existing Regional Haze SIP. In addition, the December 16, 2014 submittal includes a revised regulation that reduces the total suspended particulate (TSP) emission limit for the State's sole Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boiler. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA- R01-OAR-2014-0909 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-02), Boston, MA 02109--3912, telephone number (617) 918-1697, fax number (617) 918- 0697, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this preamble. I. Background II. Requirements for Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report SIPs and Adequacy Determinations III. EPA's Evaluation of New Hampshire's SIP Revision A. Regional Haze Progress Report B. Determination of Adequacy of Existing Regional Haze Plan C. Revised Env-A 2302.02 Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers IV. Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background States are required to submit a progress report in the form of a SIP revision every five years that evaluates progress towards the RPGs for each mandatory Class I Federal area \1\ (Class I area) within the state and in each Class I area outside the state which may be affected by emissions from within the state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). In addition, the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h) require states to submit, at the same time as the 40 CFR 51.308(g) progress report, a determination of the adequacy of the state's existing Regional Haze SIP. The first progress report SIP is due five years after submittal of the initial Regional Haze SIP. On January 29, 2010, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) submitted the State's first Regional Haze SIP in accordance with 40 CFR 51.308.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal areas consist of national parks exceeding 6000 acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks exceeding 5000 acres, and all international parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7472(a)). \2\ On August 22, 2012, EPA approved New Hampshire's Regional Haze SIP submittal addressing the requirements of the first implementation period for regional haze. See 77 FR 50602. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On December 16, 2014, NH DES submitted a revision to the New Hampshire SIP detailing the progress made in the first planning period toward implementation of the Long Term Strategy (LTS) outlined in the 2010 Regional Haze SIP submittal, the visibility improvement measured at the State's Class I areas, and a determination of the adequacy of the State's existing Regional Haze SIP. EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's December 16, 2014 SIP revision on the basis that it satisfies the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h). [[Page 46867]] II. Requirements for Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report SIPs and Adequacy Determinations Under 40 CFR 51.308(g), States must submit a regional haze progress report as a SIP revision every five years and must address the seven elements found in 40 CFR 51.308(g). As described in further detail in section III of this proposed rulemaking, 40 CFR 51.308(g) requires: (1) A description of the status of measures in the approved Regional Haze SIP; (2) a summary of emissions reductions achieved; (3) an assessment of visibility conditions for each Class I area in the state; (4) an analysis of changes in emissions from sources and activities within the state; (5) an assessment of any significant changes in anthropogenic emissions within or outside the state that have limited or impeded progress in Class I areas impacted by the state's sources; (6) an assessment of the sufficiency of the approved Regional Haze SIP; and (7) a review of the state's visibility monitoring strategy. Under 40 CFR 51.308(h), states are required to submit, at the same time as the progress report SIP, a determination of the adequacy of their existing Regional Haze SIP and to take one of the following four possible actions based on information in the progress report: (1) Submit a negative declaration to EPA that no further substantive revision to the state's existing Regional Haze SIP is needed; (2) provide notification to EPA (and other state(s) that participated in the regional planning process) if the state determines that the existing Regional Haze SIP is, or may be, inadequate to ensure reasonable progress at one or more Class I areas due to emissions from sources in other state(s) that participated in the regional haze planning process, and collaborated with these other state(s) to develop additional strategies to address deficiencies; (3) provide notification with supporting information to EPA if the state determines that its existing Regional Haze SIP is, or may be, inadequate to ensure reasonable progress at one or more Class I areas due to emissions from sources in another county; or (4) revise its Regional Haze SIP to address deficiencies within one year if the state determines that its existing Regional Haze SIP is or may be inadequate to ensure reasonable progress in one or more Class I areas due to emission from sources within the state. III. EPA's Evaluation of New Hampshire's SIP Revision On December 14, 2014, New Hampshire submitted the ``Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report'' (Progress Report) to EPA as a SIP revision. New Hampshire has two Class I areas within its borders: Great Gulf Wilderness Area (Great Gulf) and Presidential Range-Dry River Wilderness Area (Dry River), both located within the White Mountains National Forest. Emissions from New Hampshire's sources were also found to impact visibility at one nearby Class I area, Acadia National Park in Maine (Acadia). See 77 FR 11809 (February 28, 2012). Through the consultation process, New Hampshire agreed to pursue the coordinated course of action agreed to by the Mid-Atlantic/ Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) \3\ to assure reasonable progress toward preventing any future, and remedying any existing, impairment of visibility in the mandatory Class I areas within the MANE-VU region. These measures are: Implementation of best available retrofit technology (BART) requirements; a low-sulfur fuel oil strategy; a targeted electricity generating unit (EGU) strategy; and continued evaluation of other control measures.\4\ While New Hampshire did not adopt a low-sulfur fuel oil strategy for implementation during the first regional haze planning period, the State showed in its 2010 Regional Haze SIP that equivalent emission reductions were achieved through alternate measures such as recent fuel switching at a coal- fired power plant in the state (i.e., Schiller Station) and facility shutdowns. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ MANE-VU is a collaborative effort of State governments, Tribal governments, and various federal agencies established to initiate and coordinate activities associated with the management of regional haze, visibility and other air quality issues in the Northeastern United States. Member State and Tribal governments include: Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Penobscot Indian Nation, Rhode Island, and Vermont. \4\ The MANE-VU ``Ask'' was structured around the finding that SO2 emissions were the dominate visibility impairing pollutant at the Northeastern Class I areas and electrical generating units comprised the largest SO2 emission sector. See ``Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid- Atlantic States,'' January 31, 2001. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Regional Haze Progress Report This section summarizes each of the seven elements that must be addressed by the progress report under 40 CFR 51.308(g), and describes how New Hampshire's progress report SIP addresses each element. This section also includes EPA's analysis of New Hampshire's SIP, and our proposed determination as to whether the State satisfied each element. The provisions in 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1) require a description of the status of implementation of all measures included in the Regional Haze SIP for achieving RPGs for Class I areas both within and outside the state. New Hampshire's 2010 Regional Haze SIP RPGs are based on: Control measures for the State's two subject-to-BART sources; control measures for one additional EGU stack; and sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) emission reductions from States found to be contributing to the visibility impairment at the New Hampshire Class I areas. New Hampshire's two subject-to-BART sources are Eversource Energy (formally Public Service of New Hampshire (PSNH)) Merrimack Station Unit MK2 and Eversource Energy (formally PSNH) Newington Unit NT1. Along with the two subject-to-BART units, Eversource Energy Merrimack Station Unit MK1 was identified as among the top 167 EGUs contributing to visibility impairment. New Hampshire's 2010 Regional Haze SIP included control measures for these three units. The 2014 Progress Report confirms the installation and use of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) for Merrimack Station Units MK1 and MK2; the implementation of a more stringent SO2 emission limit for Newington Station; and the implementation of more stringent emission limits for the existing oxides of nitrogen (NOX ) and particulate emission control technologies in use at Merrimack and Newington Stations. In addition, the New Hampshire 2014 Progress Report also includes the status of SO2 emission reductions from the identified top 167 EGUs outside of New Hampshire.\5\ The MANE-VU targeted EGU strategy called for a 90% SO2 reduction from the top contributing stacks by 2018. New Hampshire reports SO2 scrubbers have already been placed on many of the 167 targeted EGUs, while other units have seen lower utilization or have been shut down entirely. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Memorandum from NESCAUM to MANE-VU ``Overview of State and Federal Actions Relative to MANE-VU Asks'' dated March 28, 2013. http://www.nescaum.org/documents/summary-memo-mane-vu-asks-20130328-final.pdf/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA proposes that New Hampshire's analysis adequately addresses the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1). The State demonstrates the implementation of measures within the State, including BART and targeted SO2 reductions from New Hampshire's three in-state units that were part of the contributing 167 stacks. In addition, the Progress Report documents the status of [[Page 46868]] requested SO2 reductions from the remaining top 167 stacks outside of New Hampshire. The provision under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(2) requires a summary of the emission reductions achieved in the state through the measures subject to the requirements under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(1). During the development of the Regional Haze SIP for the first planning period, MANE-VU and New Hampshire determined that SO2 was the greatest contributor to anthropogenic visibility impairment at the State's Class I areas. Therefore, the bulk of visibility improvement achieved in the first planning period was expected to result from reductions in SO2 emissions from sources inside and outside of the State. Table 6-1 of the 2014 Progress Report details the SO2 emission reduction from the 2002 New Hampshire Regional Haze SIP baseline to 2013 for not only the targeted Merrimack Station Units MK1 and MK2 and Newington Unit NT1, but all New Hampshire EGUs.\6\ The targeted EGU units subject to control through the installation of BART and New Hampshire's LTS show an emission reduction from 35,882 tons SO2 in 2002 to 1,729 tons SO2 in 2013, a reduction of 95%. NOX emissions from these same sources were reduced from 4,776 tons in 2002 to 2,230 tons in 2013, a reduction of 57%. All New Hampshire EGUs combined showed a 92.8% reduction in SO2 emissions and a 61.3% reduction in NOX emissions for the same time period. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ New Hampshire's progress report SIP includes annual unit- level emissions data for SO2 and NOX from EGUs from EPA's Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) for the years 2002 and 2013. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA proposes to find that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provision under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(2). New Hampshire has detailed the SO2 and NOX reduction from the 2002 Regional Haze baseline to the most recently available year of data at the time of the development of New Hampshire's Progress Report, 2013. In addition, NH DES highlighted SO2 and NOX emissions reductions from all New Hampshire EGUs during this same time period. The provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(3) require that states with Class I areas within their borders provide the following information for the most impaired and least impaired days \7\ for each area, with values expressed in terms of five-year averages of these annual values: (1) Current visibility conditions; (2) the difference between current visibility conditions and baseline visibility conditions; and (3) the change in visibility impairment over the past five years. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The ``most impaired days'' and ``least impaired days'' in the regional haze rule refer to the average visibility impairment (measured in deciviews (dv)) for the twenty percent monitored days in the calendar year with the highest and lowest amount of visibility impairment, respectively, averaged over a five-year period. See 40 CFR 51.301. The lower the dv, the better the visibility in an area. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Hampshire is home to two Class I areas, Great Gulf and Dry River. The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments program (IMPROVE) monitor within Great Gulf is representative of both New Hampshire Class I areas. In the Progress Report, NH DES provides the data for the baseline 2000-2004 5-Year Average visibility, the most recent 2009-2013 5-Year Average visibility, the 2018 RPG from the 2010 Regional Haze SIP, and the calculated visibility improvement. See Table 1. Table 1--Observed Visibility vs. Established Visibility Goals (Deciviews) for Great Gulf Wilderness Area ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baseline 2000- Most recent 2004 5-year 2009-2013 5- Visibility 2018 2064 Goal average year average mprovement Reasonable (natural visibility visibility progress goal visibility) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20% Most Impaired Days.......... 22.8 dv 16.7 dv 6.1 dv 19.1 dv 12.0 dv 20% Least Impaired Days......... 7.7 dv 5.9 dv 1.8 dv 7.2 dv 3.7 dv ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The baseline visibility for Great Gulf was 22.8 dv on the 20% most impaired days and 7.7 dv on the least impaired days. The most recent five-year average visibility data shows an improvement of 6.1 dv on the 20% most impaired days and 1.8 dv improvement on the 20% least impaired days. The 2014 Progress Report also demonstrates that the State has already achieved and surpassed the 2018 RPG for the 20% most impaired days and ensured no visibility degradation for the 20% least impaired days for the first planning period. EPA is proposing to find that New Hampshire provided the required information regarding visibility conditions to meet the requirements under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(3), specifically providing baseline visibility conditions (2000-2004), current conditions based on the most recently available IMPROVE monitoring data (2009-2013), and the difference between current visibility conditions and baseline visibility conditions. The provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(4) require an analysis tracking emissions changes of visibility-impairing pollutants from the state's sources by type or category over the past five years based on the most recent updated emissions inventory. In its progress report SIP to address the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g)(4), New Hampshire presents data from statewide emissions inventories developed for the years 2002, 2007, 2013 (EGUs only), and projected inventories for 2018 for SO2 , NOX , PM2.5 and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC).8 9 New Hampshire's emissions inventories include the following source classifications: Point EGUs, Point Non-EGUs, Area, On-road Mobile, and Non-road Mobile. From 2002 through 2013, New Hampshire's overall EGU (the largest SO2 sector) emissions were reduced from 43,962 tons per year (tpy) SO2 to 3,167 tpy, surpassing the 2018 projected goal of 10,766 tpy SO2 . For NOX , from 2002 to 2007, the State achieved an overall 13% reduction from 64,625 tpy to 56,110 tpy. NH DES is projecting an additional 25,000 tpy reduction in NOX by 2018, mostly from the on-road mobile sector, which would result in approximately 31,110 tpy NOX in 2018. This estimate compares well with the 2018 projected goal of 30,369 tpy. Finally, NH DES indicates that based on the 2007 emission data, the State has already exceeded the 2018 emission reduction goals for direct PM2.5 (55% reduction) and VOCs (53% reduction). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ The 2002 inventory is the MANE-VU V3.3 which is projected to 2018. The 2007 inventory is the MARAMA V3 inventory based on the 2007 National Emission Inventory (NEI). The 2013 inventory was the most recent year of Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) inventory data as reported to EPA. \9\ Mid-Atlantic Air Management Association (MARAMA) ``Regional Emissions Trends Analysis for the MANE-VU States Technical Support Document Revision 3'' dated March 22, 2013. Attachment D of the New Hampshire 2014 Progress Report. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 46869]] EPA is proposing that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(4). NH DES compared the most recent updated emission inventory data available at the time of the development of the Progress Report with the baseline emissions for the Regional Haze SIP. The progress report appropriately details the 2007 SO2 , NOX , PM2.5 and VOC reductions achieved, by sector, thus far in the regional haze planning period. In addition, the State provided the most recent annual EGU SO2 emission data, the sector determined to be the greatest contributor to visibility impairment at the Class I areas in New Hampshire and Maine. The provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(5) require an assessment of any significant changes in anthropogenic emissions within or outside the state that have occurred over the past five years that have limited or impeded progress in reducing pollutant emissions and improving visibility in Class I areas impacted by the state's sources. In its progress report SIP, New Hampshire states that sulfates continue to be the biggest single contributor to regional haze at Great Gulf, Dry River, and Acadia. While New Hampshire mainly focused its analysis on addressing large SO2 emissions from point sources, the State did not find any significant changes in NOX and PM2.5 which might impede or limit progress during the first planning period. In addition, NH DES cited the 2013 Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) report, discussed below, which indicates that all of the MANE-VU Class I areas are on track to meet the 2018 visibility goals established by the states in their Regional Haze SIPs.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ NESCAUM for MANE-VU, ``Tracking Visibility Progress 2004- 2011,'' revised May 24, 2013. http://www.nescaum.org/documents/manevu-trends-2004-2011-report-final-20130430.pdf/view. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA proposes to conclude that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(5). The State adequately demonstrated that there are no significant changes in emissions of SO2 , PM2.5 , or NOX within the state which have impeded progress in reducing emissions and improving visibility in the Class I areas impacted by New Hampshire sources. The provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(6) require an assessment of whether the current Regional Haze SIP is sufficient to enable the state, or other states, to meet the RPGs for Class I areas affected by emissions from the state. In its progress report SIP, NH DES states that it believes that the elements and strategies relied on in its original Regional Haze SIP are sufficient to enable New Hampshire and neighboring states to meet all established RPGs. To support this conclusion, NH DES notes that 2013 EGU SO2 emissions for the entire MANE-VU area are already less than the 2018 projection (315,675 tpy versus 365,024 tpy). In addition, New Hampshire discusses visibility data from Tracking Visibility Progress, 2004-2011, prepared by NESCAUM, which updated the progress at MANE-VU Class I areas during the five-year period ending in 2011, including information for the New Hampshire Class I areas, between 2000 and 2011 in the context of short- and long-term visibility goals. The report indicates that visibility impairment on the best and worst days from 2000 through 2011 have dropped at Great Gulf. New Hampshire notes the NESCAUM report indicates that all the MANE-VU Class I states continue to be on track to meet their 2018 RPGs for improved visibility and that further progress may occur through recently adopted or proposed regulatory programs. Based upon the NESCAUM report and visibility data, New Hampshire states in its Progress Report that visibility improvement at Great Gulf, Dry River, and Acadia has occurred for the most impaired days and no degradation of visibility has occurred for the least impaired days. Therefore, New Hampshire finds that Great Gulf, Dry River, and Acadia are on track to meet the RPGs for 2018 based on the observed visibility improvement. EPA proposes to conclude that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(6). EPA views this requirement as an assessment that should evaluate emissions and visibility trends and other readily available information. In its Progress Report, New Hampshire described the improving visibility trends detailed in the NESCAUM report and the downward emissions trends in key pollutants in the State and the MANE-VU region. With a focus on SO2 emissions from New Hampshire EGUs, New Hampshire determined that the State's Regional Haze SIP is sufficient for the two Class I areas within the state and the Class I area outside the state impacted by the state's emissions (Acadia) to meet their RPGs. The provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(7) require a review of the state's visibility monitoring strategy and an assessment of whether any modifications to the monitoring strategy are necessary. New Hampshire's visibility monitoring strategy relies upon participation in the IMPROVE network. The IMPROVE monitor at the Great Gulf area is located approximately 1 mile east of the wilderness boundary and also serves as the monitor for the Dry River area whose northern most limit lies only 5 miles southwest of the monitor location. NH DES finds that there is no indication of a need for additional monitoring sites or equipment. EPA proposes to find that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(g)(7) by reviewing the state's visibility monitoring strategy and assessing whether any modifications to the monitoring strategy are necessary. B. Determination of Adequacy of Existing Regional Haze Plan Under 40 CFR 51.308(h), states are required to take one of four possible actions based on the information gathered and conclusions made in the progress report SIP. In its progress report SIP, New Hampshire took the action provided for by the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h)(1), which allow a state to submit a negative declaration to EPA. In the 2014 SIP submittal, New Hampshire determined that the existing Regional Haze SIP requires no further substantive revision at this time to achieve the RPGs for Class I areas affected by the state's sources. The basis for the State's negative declaration is the finding that visibility has improved at all Class I areas in the MANE-VU region. In addition, SO2 emissions from the State's EGUs have decreased beyond the original 2018 projections. While NOX reductions have yet to fully meet the 2018 projections, additional substantial NOX emission reductions are expected from the mobile sector over the next several years. Finally, New Hampshire expects the downward trend in SO2 emissions from EGUs in the other MANE-VU states to continue through 2018. EPA proposes to conclude that New Hampshire has adequately addressed the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h) because the visibility and emission trends indicate that the Great Gulf and Dry River Areas, in addition to Acadia which is the Class I area impacted by New Hampshire sources, will be able to meet or exceed the RPGs for 2018. C. Revised Env-A 2302.02 Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential- Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers On August 22, 2012, EPA approved New Hampshire's Env-A 2300 Mitigation of Regional Haze into New [[Page 46870]] Hampshire's SIP. See 77 FR 50602. Env-A 2300 is the New Hampshire regulation which establishes the emission limits associated with control measures adopted through the Regional Haze process. In the New Hampshire 2010 Regional Haze SIP, the current use of an Electrostatic Precipitator on Newington Station Unit NT1 \11\ represented BART for particulate control. At the time of EPA's approval, a single available stack test yielded a controlled TSP rate in the vicinity of 0.06 pounds TSP per million British thermal units (lb TSP/MMBtu) and was used to establish the TSP limit for NT1. However, the facility's Title V operating permit required that a compliance stack test for particulate matter be performed and the permit limit be amended, as appropriate, based on the results of the test. Subsequent stack testing demonstrated that 0.04 lb TSP/MMbtu is a more appropriate emission limit. Revised Env-A 2302.02, which was included in New Hampshire's December 16, 2014 SIP submittal, reduces the TSP emission limit for Newington NT1 from 0.06 lb TSP/MMbtu to 0.04 lb TSP/MMbtu. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ PSNH Newington Station Unit NT1 is the only Tangential- Firing, Dry-Bottom Boiler in New Hampshire. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA is proposing to find that New Hampshire's revised Env-A 2302.02 strengthens the existing SIP and is therefore proposing to approve, and incorporate into the New Hampshire SIP, revised Env-A 2302.02. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this notice or on other relevant matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action. Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure by submitting written comments to the EPA New England Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal Register. IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire's December 16, 2014 Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report as meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h). In addition, EPA is proposing to approve, and incorporate into the New Hampshire SIP, New Hampshire's revised section Env-A 2302.02 Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry Bottom Boilers. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rulemaking, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference New Hampshire's revised Env-A 2302.02 Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers, effective November 22, 2014. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Regional Haze, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: July 6, 2016. H. Curtis Spalding, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 2016-17063 Filed 7-18-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![46866 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
described in the amendments to 40 CFR SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a EPA.
made, and will continue to make, these State Implementation Plan (SIP) Organization of this document. The
materials generally available through revision submitted by the State of New following outline is provided to aid in
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Hampshire on December 16, 2014. New locating information in this preamble.
Region 8 Office (please contact the Hampshire’s SIP revision addresses I. Background
person identified in the FOR FURTHER requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) II. Requirements for Regional Haze 5-Year
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this and EPA’s rules that require states to Progress Report SIPs and Adequacy
preamble for more information). submit periodic reports describing Determinations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: progress toward reasonable progress III. EPA’s Evaluation of New Hampshire’s SIP
In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ goals (RPGs) established for regional Revision
haze and a determination of the A. Regional Haze Progress Report
section of this Federal Register, the EPA B. Determination of Adequacy of Existing
is approving the State’s SIP revision as adequacy of the State’s existing Regional
Haze SIP. In addition, the December 16, Regional Haze Plan
a direct final rule without prior proposal C. Revised Env–A 2302.02 Emission
because the agency views this as a 2014 submittal includes a revised
Standards Applicable to Tangential-
noncontroversial SIP revision and regulation that reduces the total Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers
anticipates no adverse comments. A suspended particulate (TSP) emission IV. Proposed Action
detailed rationale for the approval is set limit for the State’s sole Tangential- V. Incorporation by Reference
forth in the preamble to the direct final Firing, Dry-Bottom Boiler. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
rule. DATES: Written comments must be
I. Background
If the EPA receives no adverse received on or before August 18, 2016.
comments, the EPA will not take further ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, States are required to submit a
action on this proposed rule. If the EPA identified by Docket ID Number EPA– progress report in the form of a SIP
receives adverse comments, the EPA R01–OAR–2014–0909 at http:// revision every five years that evaluates
will withdraw the direct final rule and www.regulations.gov, or via email to progress towards the RPGs for each
it will not take effect. The EPA will arnold.anne@epa.gov. For comments mandatory Class I Federal area 1 (Class
address all public comments in a submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the I area) within the state and in each Class
subsequent final rule based on this online instructions for submitting I area outside the state which may be
proposed rule. comments. Once submitted, comments affected by emissions from within the
The EPA will not institute a second cannot be edited or removed from state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). In addition,
comment period on this action. Any Regulations.gov. For either manner of the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h)
parties interested in commenting must submission, the EPA may publish any require states to submit, at the same
do so at this time. For further comment received to its public docket. time as the 40 CFR 51.308(g) progress
information, please see the ADDRESSES Do not submit electronically any report, a determination of the adequacy
section of this notice. information you consider to be of the state’s existing Regional Haze SIP.
Please note that if the EPA receives Confidential Business Information (CBI) The first progress report SIP is due five
adverse comment on a distinct or other information whose disclosure is years after submittal of the initial
provision of this rule and if that restricted by statute. Multimedia Regional Haze SIP. On January 29, 2010,
provision may be severed from the submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be the New Hampshire Department of
remainder of the rule, the EPA may accompanied by a written comment. Environmental Services (NH DES)
adopt as final those provisions of the The written comment is considered the submitted the State’s first Regional Haze
rule that are not the subject of an official comment and should include SIP in accordance with 40 CFR 51.308.2
adverse comment. See the information discussion of all points you wish to On December 16, 2014, NH DES
provided in the Direct Final action of make. The EPA will generally not submitted a revision to the New
the same title which is located in the consider comments or comment Hampshire SIP detailing the progress
Rules and Regulations Section of this contents located outside of the primary made in the first planning period
Federal Register. submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or toward implementation of the Long
other file sharing system). For Term Strategy (LTS) outlined in the
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. additional submission methods, please 2010 Regional Haze SIP submittal, the
Dated: June 22, 2016. contact the person identified in the ‘‘For visibility improvement measured at the
Shaun L. McGrath, Further Information Contact’’ section. State’s Class I areas, and a
Regional Administrator, Region 8. For the full EPA public comment policy, determination of the adequacy of the
[FR Doc. 2016–16960 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am] information about CBI or multimedia State’s existing Regional Haze SIP. EPA
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
submissions, and general guidance on is proposing to approve New
making effective comments, please visit Hampshire’s December 16, 2014 SIP
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ revision on the basis that it satisfies the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION commenting-epa-dockets. requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and
AGENCY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (h).
Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Unit,
40 CFR Part 52 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1 Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal
EPA New England Regional Office, 5 areas consist of national parks exceeding 6000
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks
[EPA–R01–OAR–2014–0909; FRL–9949–15– Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail exceeding 5000 acres, and all international parks
Region 1] Code OEP05–02), Boston, MA 02109— that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C.
3912, telephone number (617) 918– 7472(a)).
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; 1697, fax number (617) 918–0697, email 2 On August 22, 2012, EPA approved New
Regional Haze 5-Year Report mcwilliams.anne@epa.gov. Hampshire’s Regional Haze SIP submittal
addressing the requirements of the first
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: implementation period for regional haze. See 77 FR
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Throughout this document whenever 50602.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:34 Jul 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM 19JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47004/page/1.svg)
![46870 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Hampshire’s SIP. See 77 FR 50602. Env- accordance with requirements of 1 CFR be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
A 2300 is the New Hampshire 51.5, the EPA is proposing to and
regulation which establishes the incorporate by reference New • Does not provide EPA with the
emission limits associated with control Hampshire’s revised Env-A 2302.02 discretionary authority to address, as
measures adopted through the Regional Emission Standards Applicable to appropriate, disproportionate human
Haze process. In the New Hampshire Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers, health or environmental effects, using
2010 Regional Haze SIP, the current use effective November 22, 2014. The EPA practicable and legally permissible
of an Electrostatic Precipitator on has made, and will continue to make, methods, under Executive Order 12898
Newington Station Unit NT1 11 these documents generally available (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
represented BART for particulate electronically through http:// In addition, the SIP is not approved
control. At the time of EPA’s approval, www.regulations.gov and/or in hard to apply on any Indian reservation land
a single available stack test yielded a copy at the appropriate EPA office (see or in any other area where EPA or an
controlled TSP rate in the vicinity of the ADDRESSES section of this preamble Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
0.06 pounds TSP per million British for more information). tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
thermal units (lb TSP/MMBtu) and was Indian country, the rule does not have
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
used to establish the TSP limit for NT1. tribal implications and will not impose
Reviews
However, the facility’s Title V operating substantial direct costs on tribal
permit required that a compliance stack Under the Clean Air Act, the governments or preempt tribal law as
test for particulate matter be performed Administrator is required to approve a specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
and the permit limit be amended, as SIP submission that complies with the FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
appropriate, based on the results of the provisions of the Act and applicable
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
test. Subsequent stack testing Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
demonstrated that 0.04 lb TSP/MMbtu 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Environmental protection, Air
is a more appropriate emission limit. submissions, EPA’s role is to approve pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Revised Env-A 2302.02, which was state choices, provided that they meet Incorporation by reference,
included in New Hampshire’s December the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
16, 2014 SIP submittal, reduces the TSP Accordingly, this proposed action Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
emission limit for Newington NT1 from merely approves state law as meeting matter, Regional Haze, Reporting and
0.06 lb TSP/MMbtu to 0.04 lb TSP/ Federal requirements and does not recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
MMbtu. impose additional requirements beyond oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
EPA is proposing to find that New those imposed by state law. For that Dated: July 6, 2016.
Hampshire’s revised Env-A 2302.02 reason, this proposed action: H. Curtis Spalding,
strengthens the existing SIP and is • Is not a significant regulatory action Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
therefore proposing to approve, and subject to review by the Office of
[FR Doc. 2016–17063 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am]
incorporate into the New Hampshire Management and Budget under
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SIP, revised Env-A 2302.02. Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735,
EPA is soliciting public comments on October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
the issues discussed in this notice or on January 21, 2011);
other relevant matters. These comments • Does not impose an information FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
will be considered before taking final collection burden under the provisions COMMISSION
action. Interested parties may of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 47 CFR Parts 0, 1, and 63
participate in the Federal rulemaking U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
procedure by submitting written • Is certified as not having a [IB Docket No. 16–155, FCC 16–79]
comments to the EPA New England significant economic impact on a
Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES substantial number of small entities Process Reform for Executive Branch
section of this Federal Register. under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Review of Certain FCC Applications
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); and Petitions Involving Foreign
IV. Proposed Action Ownership
• Does not contain any unfunded
EPA is proposing to approve New mandate or significantly or uniquely AGENCY: Federal Communications
Hampshire’s December 16, 2014 affect small governments, as described Commission.
Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report as in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
meeting the requirements of 40 CFR ACTION: Proposed rule.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
51.308(g) and (h). In addition, EPA is • Does not have Federalism SUMMARY: In this Notice of Proposed
proposing to approve, and incorporate implications as specified in Executive Rulemaking (NPRM), the Federal
into the New Hampshire SIP, New Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Communications Commission
Hampshire’s revised section Env-A 1999); (Commission) proposes changes to our
2302.02 Emission Standards Applicable • Is not an economically significant rules and procedures related to certain
to Tangential-Firing, Dry Bottom regulatory action based on health or applications and petitions for
Boilers. safety risks subject to Executive Order declaratory ruling involving foreign
V. Incorporation by Reference 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); ownership (together, ‘‘applications’’).
• Is not a significant regulatory action The Commission refers certain
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
In this rulemaking, the EPA is
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR applications to the relevant Executive
proposing to include in a final EPA rule
28355, May 22, 2001); Branch agencies for their input on any
regulatory text that includes
• Is not subject to requirements of national security, law enforcement,
incorporation by reference. In
Section 12(d) of the National foreign policy, and trade policy
11 PSNH Newington Station Unit NT1 is the only Technology Transfer and Advancement concerns that may arise from the foreign
Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boiler in New Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because ownership interests held in the
Hampshire. application of those requirements would applicants and petitioners (together,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:34 Jul 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM 19JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47004/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-19 01:10:49
Document Modified: 2016-07-19 01:10:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2016. | |
| Contact | Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05-02), Boston, MA 02109--3912, telephone number (617) 918-1697, fax number (617) 918- 0697, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 46866 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Regional Haze; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR