81 FR 4905 - Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Americold Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate Matter (PM10

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 18 (January 28, 2016)

Page Range		4905-4906
FR Document		2016-01661

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri on June 2, 2014. This proposed SIP revision will incorporate a consent judgment to address violations of the 24-hour particulate matter (PM<INF>10</INF>) NAAQS near the Americold Logistics, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) facility near Carthage, Missouri. CCL is a limestone quarry operations. The consent judgment between the State of Missouri and CCL includes measures that will control PM<INF>10</INF> emissions from the facility. This proposed approval will make the consent judgment Federally-enforceable.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4905-4906]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01661]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0644; FRL-9941-66-Region 7]

Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Americold Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate Matter (PM10)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Consent Judgment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Missouri on June 2, 2014. This proposed SIP revision will
incorporate a consent judgment to address violations of the 24-hour
particulate matter (PM10) NAAQS near the Americold
Logistics, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) facility near
Carthage, Missouri. CCL is a limestone quarry operations. The consent
judgment between the State of Missouri and CCL includes measures that
will control PM10 emissions from the facility. This proposed
approval will make the consent judgment Federally-enforceable.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by
February 29, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2015-0644, to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment.

[[Page 4906]]

The written comment is considered the official comment and should
include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7039, or by email at
hamilton.heather@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the states SIP revision as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comments on part of this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as a final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides.

Dated: January 11, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2016-01661 Filed 1-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 4905

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– of the rule that are not the subject of an
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. OAR–2015–0366 at http:// adverse comment. For additional
§ 71.1 [Amended] www.regulations.gov or via email to information, see the direct final rule
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments which is located in the Rules section of
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the this Federal Register.
Airspace Designations and Reporting online instructions for submitting Dated: January 13, 2016.
Points, dated August 6, 2015, and comments. Once submitted, comments Susan Hedman,
effective September 15, 2015, is cannot be edited or removed from
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
amended as follows: Regulations.gov. For either manner of
[FR Doc. 2016–01576 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am]
submission, EPA may publish any
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas comment received to its public docket. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Do not submit electronically any
Above the Surface of the Earth. information you consider to be
* * * * * Confidential Business Information (CBI) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
or other information whose disclosure is AGENCY
ANM WA E5 Shelton, WA [New]
Sanderson Field Airport, WA restricted by statute. Multimedia 40 CFR Part 52
(Lat. 47°14′01″ N., long. 1243°08′51″ W.) submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. [EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0644; FRL–9941–66–
That airspace extending upward from 700 Region 7]
feet above the surface within a 4-mile radius The written comment is considered the
of the Sanderson Field Airport, and that official comment and should include
Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality
airspace 1.5 miles either side of the 068° discussion of all points you wish to
Implementation Plans; Americold
bearing from airport extending from the 4- make. EPA will generally not consider
mile radius to 5 miles northeast of the Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate
comments or comment contents located
airport, and that airspace 2.3 miles either Matter (PM10) National Ambient Air
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
side of the 248° bearing from airport Quality Standard (NAAQS) Consent
on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
extending from the 4-mile radius to 9.5 miles Judgment
southwest of the airport. system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January identified in the FOR FURTHER Agency.
15, 2016.
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the ACTION: Proposed rule.
Tracey Johnson, full EPA public comment policy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western information about CBI or multimedia SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Service Center. submissions, and general guidance on Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
[FR Doc. 2016–01503 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] making effective comments, please visit revision to the State Implementation
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
commenting-epa-dockets. Missouri on June 2, 2014. This proposed
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SIP revision will incorporate a consent
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Charles Hatten, Environmental judgment to address violations of the
AGENCY Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 24-hour particulate matter (PM10)
Programs Branch (AR–18J), NAAQS near the Americold Logistics,
40 CFR Part 52 Environmental Protection Agency, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL)
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0366; FRL–9941–52– Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, facility near Carthage, Missouri. CCL is
Region 5] Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, a limestone quarry operations. The
hatten.charles@epa.gov. consent judgment between the State of
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Inver SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Missouri and CCL includes measures
Hills SO2 Final Rules section of this Federal that will control PM10 emissions from
Register, EPA is approving Minnesota’s the facility. This proposed approval will
AGENCY: Environmental Protection make the consent judgment Federally-
Agency (EPA). SO2 SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the enforceable.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Agency views this as a noncontroversial DATES: Comments on this proposed
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection submittal and anticipates no adverse action must be received in writing by
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a comments. A detailed rationale for the February 29, 2016.
revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide approval is set forth in the direct final ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
(SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) rule. If EPA does not receive adverse identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
for Northern States Power Company’s comments in response to this rule, no OAR–2015–0644, to http://
Xcel Energy-Inver Hills Generating further activity is contemplated. If EPA www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Plant, located in Inver Grove Heights, receives adverse comments, EPA will instructions for submitting comments.
Minnesota. The revision, submitted by withdraw the direct final rule and will Once submitted, comments cannot be
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency address all public comments received in edited or removed from regulations.gov.
on May 1, 2015, incorporates a more a subsequent final rule based on this The EPA may publish any comment
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

stringent limit for the sulfur content of proposed rule. EPA will not institute a received to its public docket. Do not
the fuel used at the facility, and second comment period. Any parties submit electronically any information
modifies the fuel analysis requirements interested in commenting on this action you consider to be Confidential
to meet the more stringent limit. These should do so at this time. Please note Business Information (CBI) or other
revisions will not result in an increase that if EPA receives adverse comment information whose disclosure is
in SO2 emissions at the facility. on an amendment, paragraph, or section restricted by statute. Multimedia
DATES: Comments must be received on of this rule, and if that provision can be submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
or before February 29, 2016. severed from the remainder of the rule, accompanied by a written comment.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:21 Jan 27, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM 28JAP1

$4906 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules The written comment is considered the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the receives adverse comments on part of official comment and should include final rules section of this Federal this rule and if that part can be severed discussion of all points you wish to Register, EPA is approving the states from the remainder of the rule, EPA may make. The EPA will generally not SIP revision as a direct final rule adopt as a final those parts of the rule consider comments or comment without prior proposal because the that are not the subject of an adverse contents located outside of the primary Agency views this as a noncontroversial comment. For additional information, submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or revision amendment and anticipates no see the direct final rule which is located other file sharing system). For relevant adverse comments to this in the rules section of this Federal additional submission methods, the full action. A detailed rationale for the Register. EPA public comment policy, approval is set forth in the direct final List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 information about CBI or multimedia rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, Environmental protection, Air submissions, and general guidance on pollution control, Carbon monoxide, making effective comments, please visit no further activity is contemplated in Incorporation by reference, http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ relation to this action. If EPA receives Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen commenting-epa-dockets. relevant adverse comments, the direct dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting final rule will be withdrawn and all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur public comments received will be oxides. Heather Hamilton, Environmental addressed in a subsequent final rule Protection Agency, Air Planning and based on this proposed action. EPA will Dated: January 11, 2016. Development Branch, 11201 Renner not institute a second comment period Mark Hague, Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at on this action. Any parties interested in Regional Administrator, Region 7. (913) 551–7039, or by email at commenting on this action should do so [FR Doc. 2016–01661 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] hamilton.heather@epa.gov. at this time. Please note that if EPA BILLING CODE 6560–50–P wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:21 Jan 27, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM 28JAP1$

Document Created: 2018-02-02 12:40:57
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 12:40:57

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Proposed rule.
Dates		Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by February 29, 2016.
Contact		Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at (913) 551-7039, or by email at [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 4905
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides