81 FR 52926 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Detection of Loss of Connection
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 154 (August 10, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 154 (August 10, 2016)
| Page Range | 52926-52932 | |
| FR Document | 2016-18911 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 52926-52932] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-18911] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-78480; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2016-097] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Detection of Loss of Connection August 4, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 28, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to [[Page 52927]] solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend NASDAQ Options Market LLC's (``NOM'') Rules at Chapter VI, Section 6, entitled ``Acceptance of Quotes and Orders'' to adopt functionality which is designed to assist NOM Participants, hereinafter ``Participants,'' in the event that they lose communication with their assigned Financial Information eXchange (``FIX''),\3\ Specialized Quote Feed (``SQF''),\4\ or Ouch to Trade Options (``OTTO'') \5\ Ports due to a loss of connectivity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ FIX permits the entry of orders. \4\ SQF permits the transmission of quotes to the Exchange by a NOM Market Maker using its Client Application. \5\ OTTO permits the transmission of orders to the Exchange by a Participant. Immediate or cancel orders will not be cancelled pursuant to this Chapter VI, Section 6 because, by definition, these orders will cancel if not executed. All Participants have the ability to utilize OTTO. Orders submitted by NOM Market Makers over this interface will be treated as quotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter VI, Section 6, entitled ``Acceptance of Quotes and Orders'' to adopt a new section ``(e)'' entitled ``Detection of Loss of Connection,'' a new automated process which NOM proposes to adopt for its SQF,\6\ FIX and OTTO Ports in the event that they lose communication with a Client Application due to a loss of connectivity. This feature is designed to protect NOM Options Market Makers \7\ and other market participants from inadvertent exposure to excessive risk. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Today, SQF, FIX and OTTO have the capability to cancel quotes and orders respectively. The rule change would adopt a formalized process to automatically disconnect and cancel quotes for SQF and offer the opportunity to cancel orders for FIX and OTTO in addition to a disconnect if elected, when there is a loss of communication with the Participant's Client Application. The Exchange is formalizing the process within Chapter VI, Section 6(e). \7\ The term ``Nasdaq Options Market Maker'' or ``Options Market Maker'' (herein ``NOM Market Maker'') means an Options Participant registered with the Exchange for the purpose of making markets in options contracts traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the rights and responsibilities specified in Chapter VII of these Rules. See NOM Rules at Chapter I, Section 1(a)(26). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- By way of background, Participants currently enter quotes and orders utilizing either an SQF, FIX or OTTO Port. SQF is utilized by NOM Options Market Makers. FIX and OTTO are available to all market participants. These ports are System \8\ components through which a Participant communicates its quotes and/or orders to the NOM match engine through the Participant's Client Application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ The term ``System'' shall mean the automated system for order execution and trade reporting owned and operated by NOM as the NOM Options market. See Chapter VI, Section 1(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the proposed rule change, an SQF Port would be defined as the Exchange's System component through which Participants communicate their quotes from the Client Application at proposed Chapter VI, Section 6(e)(i)(B). FIX and OTTO Ports would be defined as the Exchange's System components through which Participants communicate their orders from the Client Application at proposed Chapter VI, Section 6(e)(i)(C). NOM Options Market Makers may submit quotes to the Exchange from one or more SQF Ports. Similarly, market participants may submit orders to the Exchange from one or more FIX and/or OTTO Ports. The proposed removal feature will be mandatory for each NOM Market Makers utilizing SQF for the removal of quotes and optional for any market participant utilizing FIX and OTTO for the removal of orders. When the SQF Port detects the loss of communication with a Participant's Client Application because the Exchange's server does not receive a Heartbeat message \9\ for a certain period of time (``nn'' seconds), the Exchange will automatically logoff the Participant's affected Client Application and automatically cancel all of the Participant's open quotes. Quotes will be cancelled across all Client Applications that are associated with the same NOM Market Makers ID and underlying issues. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ It is important to note that the Exchange separately sends a connectivity message to the Participant as evidence of connectivity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to define ``Client Application'' as the System component of the Participant through which the Exchange Participant communicates its quotes and orders to the Exchange at proposed Chapter VI, Section 6(e)(i)(D). The Exchange proposes to define a ``Heartbeat'' message as a communication that acts as a virtual pulse between the SQF, FIX or OTTO Port and the Client Application at proposed Chapter VI, Section 6(e)(i)(A). The Heartbeat message sent by the Participant and subsequently received by the Exchange allows the SQF, FIX or OTTO Port to continually monitor its connection with the Participant. SQF Ports The Exchange's System has a default time period, which will trigger a disconnect from the Exchange and remove quotes, set to fifteen (15) seconds for SQF Ports. A Participant may change the default period of ``nn'' seconds of no technical connectivity to trigger a disconnect from the Exchange and remove quotes to a number between one hundred (100) milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds for SQF Ports prior to each session of connectivity to the Exchange. This feature is enabled for each NOM Market Makers and may not be disabled. There are two ways to change the number of ``nn'' seconds: (1) systemically or (2) by contacting the Exchange's operations staff. If the Participant systemically changes the default number of ``nn'' seconds, that new setting shall be in effect throughout the current session of connectivity \10\ and will then default back to fifteen seconds.\11\ The Participant may change the default setting systemically prior to each session of connectivity. The Participant may also communicate the time to the Exchange by calling the Exchange's operations staff. If the time period is communicated to the [[Page 52928]] Exchange by calling Exchange operations, the number of ``nn'' seconds selected by the Participant shall persist for each subsequent session of connectivity until the Participant either contacts Exchange operations and changes the setting or the Participant systemically selects another time period prior to the next session of connectivity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Each time the Participant connects to the Exchange's System is a new period of connectivity. For example, if the Participant were to connect and then disconnect within a trading day several times, each time the Participant disconnected the next session would be a new session of connectivity. \11\ The Exchange's System would capture the new setting information that was changed by the Participant and utilize the amended setting for that particular session. The setting would not persist beyond the current session of connectivity and the setting would default back to 15 seconds for the next session if the Participant did not change the setting again. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIX Ports The Exchange's System has a default time period, which will trigger a disconnect from the Exchange and remove orders, set to thirty (30) seconds for FIX Ports. The Participant may disable the removal of orders feature but not the disconnect feature. If the Participant elects to have its orders removed, in addition to the disconnect, the Participant may determine a time period of no technical connectivity to trigger the disconnect and removal of orders between (1) second and thirty (30) seconds for FIX Ports prior to each session of connectivity to the Exchange. There are two ways to change the number of ``nn'' seconds: (1) systemically or (2) by contacting the Exchange's operations staff. If the Participant systemically changes the default number of ``nn'' seconds, that new setting shall be in effect throughout that session of connectivity and will then default back to thirty seconds at the end of that session. The Participant may change the default setting systemically prior to each session of connectivity. The Participant may also communicate the time to the Exchange by calling the Exchange's operations staff. If the time period is communicated to the Exchange by calling Exchange operations, the number of ``nn'' seconds selected by the Participant shall persist for each subsequent session of connectivity until the Participant either contacts Exchange operations and changes the setting or the Participant systemically selects another time period prior to the next session of connectivity. Similar to SQF Ports, when a FIX Port detects the loss of communication with a Participant's Client Application for a certain time period (``nn'' seconds), the Exchange will automatically logoff the Participant's affected Client Application and if elected, automatically cancel all open orders. The Participant may have an order which has routed away prior to the cancellation, in the event that the order returns to the Order Book, because it was either not filled or partially filled, that order will be subsequently cancelled. The disconnect feature is mandatory for FIX users, however the user has the ability to elect to also enable a removal feature, which will cancel all open orders submitted through that FIX Port. If the removal of orders feature is not enabled, the System will simply disconnect the FIX user and not cancel any orders. The FIX user would have to commence a new session to add, modify or cancel its orders once disconnected. OTTO Ports The Exchange's System has a default time period, which will trigger a disconnect from the Exchange and remove orders, set to fifteen (15) seconds for OTTO Ports. The Participant may disable the removal of orders feature but not the disconnect feature. If the Participant elects to have its orders removed, in addition to the disconnect, the Participant may determine a time period of no technical connectivity to trigger the disconnect and removal of orders between one hundred (100) milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds. There are two ways to change the number of ``nn'' seconds: (1) systemically or (2) by contacting the Exchange's operations staff. If the Participant systemically changes the default number of ``nn'' seconds, that new setting shall be in effect throughout that session of connectivity and will then default back to fifteen seconds at the end of that session. The Participant may change the default setting systemically prior to each session of connectivity. The Participant may also communicate the time to the Exchange by calling the Exchange's operations staff. If the time period is communicated to the Exchange by calling Exchange operations, the number of ``nn'' seconds selected by the Participant shall persist for each subsequent session of connectivity until the Participant either contacts Exchange operations and changes the setting or the Participant systemically selects another time period prior to the next session of connectivity. Similar to SQF and FIX Ports, when an OTTO Port detects the loss of communication with a Participant's Client Application for a certain time period (``nn'' seconds), the Exchange will automatically logoff the Participant's affected Client Application and if elected, automatically cancel all open orders. The Participant may have an order which has routed away prior to the cancellation; in the event that the order returns to the Order Book, because it was either not filled or partially filled, that order will be subsequently cancelled. The disconnect feature is mandatory for OTTO users however the user has the ability to elect to also enable a removal feature, which will cancel all open orders submitted through that OTTO Port. If the removal of orders feature is not enabled, the System will simply disconnect the OTTO user and not cancel any orders. The OTTO user would have to commence a new session to add, modify or cancel its orders once disconnected. The trigger for the SQF, FIX and OTTO Ports is event and Client Application specific. The automatic cancellation of the NOM Market Maker's quotes for SQF Ports and open orders, if elected by the Participant for FIX and OTTO Ports entered into the respective SQF, FIX or OTTO Ports via a particular Client Application will neither impact nor determine the treatment of the quotes of other NOM Market Makers entered into SQF Ports or orders of the same or other Participants entered into FIX or OTTO Ports via a separate and distinct Client Application. In other words, with respect to quotes, each NOM Market Maker only maintains one quote in a given option in the order book. A new quote would replace the existing quote. Orders on the other hand do not replace each other in the order book as multiple orders may exist in a given option at once. Therefore, the difference in the impact between NOM Market Makers submitting quotes and Participants submitting orders is that quotes may continue to be submitted and/or refreshed by unaffected NOM Market Makers because these market participants are cancelled based on ID when an SQF Port disconnects, whereas all of the open orders submitted by a given firm will be impacted when a FIX or OTTO port disconnects, if the firm elected to have orders cancelled. The Exchange will issue an Options Trader Alert advising Participants on the manner in which they should communicate the number of ``nn'' seconds to the Exchange for SQF, FIX and OTTO Ports. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest, by offering removal functionality for NOM Market Makers as well as all other market participants to prevent disruption in the marketplace and also [[Page 52929]] offering this removal feature to other market participants. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOM Market Makers will be required to utilize removal functionality with respect to SQF Ports. This feature will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and protect investors and the public interest by requiring NOM Market Makers quotes to be removed in the event of a loss of connectivity with the Exchange's System. NOM Market Makers provide liquidity to the market place and have obligations unlike other market participants.\14\ This risk feature for SQF is important because it will enable NOM Market Makers to avoid risks associated with inadvertent executions in the event of a loss of connectivity with the Exchange. The proposed rule change is designed to not permit unfair discrimination among market participants, as it would apply uniformly to all NOM Market Makers utilizing SQF. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Pursuant to NOM Rules at Chapter VII, Section 5, entitled ``Obligations of NOM Options Market Makers'', in registering as a market maker, an Options Participant commits himself to various obligations. Transactions of a NOM Options Market Makers must constitute a course of dealings reasonably calculated to contribute to the maintenance of a fair and orderly market, and NOM Options Market Makers should not make bids or offers or enter into transactions that are inconsistent with such course of dealings. Further, all NOM Options Market Makers are designated as specialists on NOM for all purposes under the Act or rules thereunder. See Chapter VII, Section 5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Utilizing a time period for SQF Ports of fifteen (15) seconds and permitting the NOM Market Makers to modify the setting to between 100 milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds is consistent with the Act because the Exchange does not desire to trigger unwarranted logoffs of Participants and therefore allows Participants the ability to set their time in order to enable the Exchange the authority to disconnect the Participant with this feature. Each NOM Market Makers has different levels of sensitivity with respect to this disconnect setting and each NOM Market Makers has their own system safeguards as well. A default setting of fifteen (15) seconds is appropriate to capture the needs of all NOM Market Makers and high enough not to trigger unwarranted removal of quotes. Further, NOM Market Makers are able to customize their setting. The Exchange's proposal to permit a timeframe for SQF Ports between 100 milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds is consistent with the Act and the protection of investors because the purpose of this feature is to mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application. Participants are able to better anticipate the appropriate time within which they may require prior to a logoff as compared to the Exchange. The Participant is being offered a timeframe by the Exchange within which to select the appropriate time. The Exchange does not desire to trigger unwarranted logoffs of Participants and therefore permits Participants to provide an alternative time to the Exchange, within the Exchange's prescribed timeframe, which authorized the Exchange to disconnect the Participant. The ``nn'' seconds serve as the Participant's instruction to the Exchange to act upon the loss of connection and remove quotes from the System. This range will accommodate Participants in selecting their appropriate times within the prescribed timeframes. Also, NOM Market Makers have quoting obligations \15\ and are more sensitive to price movements as compared to other market participants. It is consistent with the Act to provide a wider timeframe within which to customize settings for FIX Ports as compared to SQF Ports. NOM Market Makers need to remain vigilant of market conditions and react more quickly to market movements as compared to other Participants entering orders into the System. The proposal acknowledges this sensitivity borne by NOM Market Makers and reflects the reaction time of NOM Market Makers as compared to Participants entering orders. Of note, the proposed customized timeframe for FIX would be too long for NOM Market Makers given their quoting requirements and sensitivity to price movements. NOM Market Makers would be severely impacted by a loss of connectivity of more than several seconds. The NOM Market Makers would have exposure during the time period in which they are unable to manage their quote and update that quote. The Participant is best positioned to determine its setting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See note 14 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's proposal is further consistent with the Act because it will mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application which protects investors and the public interest. Also, any interest that is executable against a NOM Market Maker's quotes that is received \16\ by the Exchange prior to the trigger of the disconnect to the Client Application, which is processed by the System, automatically executes at the price up to the NOM Market Maker's size. In other words, the System will process the request for cancellation in the order it was received by the System. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The time of receipt for an order or quote is the time such message is processed by the Exchange book. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The System operates consistently with the firm quote obligations of a broker-dealer pursuant to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS. Specifically, with respect to NOM Market Makers, their obligation to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis is not diminished by the removal of such quotes triggered by the disconnect. NOM Market Makers are required to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis.\17\ NOM Market Makers will not be relieved of the obligation to provide continuous two-sided quotes on a daily basis, nor will it prohibit the Exchange from taking disciplinary action against a NOM Market Makers for failing to meet the continuous quoting obligation each trading day as a result of disconnects. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See note 14 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposal to permit NOM Market Makers to amend the default setting at the beginning of each session of connectivity is consistent with the Act because it avoids unwarranted logoffs of Participants and provides Participants the opportunity to set a time, within the prescribed timeframe, to authorize the Exchange to disconnect the Participant. Today, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') and NASDAQ BX, INC. (``BX'') offer its market makers a similar feature to the one proposed by the Exchange for the automatic removal of quotes when connectivity issues arise.\18\ Phlx and BX have identical rules to the NOM proposal for SQF Ports. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to FIX Ports,\19\ the Exchange will offer an optional removal functionality to all market participants. Offering the FIX removal feature on a voluntary basis to all other non-Market Maker Participants is consistent with the Act because it permits them an opportunity to utilize this risk feature, if desired, and avoid risks associated with inadvertent executions in the event of a loss of connectivity with the Exchange. The removal feature is designed to mitigate the risk of missed and/or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ OTTO ports may be utilized today by non-NOM Market Makers. The removal functionality remains optional for non-NOM Market Makers similar to FIX. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change is designed to not permit unfair discrimination among market participants, as this [[Page 52930]] removal feature will be offered uniformly to all Participants utilizing FIX. The Exchange will not require OTTO users to utilize the removal feature for orders similar to FIX. The disconnect feature for FIX is mandatory, however market participants will have the option to either enable or disable the removal feature, which would result in the cancellation of all orders submitted over a FIX port when such port disconnects. It is appropriate to offer this removal feature as optional to all market participants utilizing FIX because these market participants may not bear the same magnitude of risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions.\20\ In addition, market participants utilizing FIX may desire their orders to remain on the order book despite a technical disconnect, so as not to miss any opportunities for execution of such orders while the FIX session is disconnected. The Exchange will disconnect Participants from the Exchange and not cancel its orders if the removal feature is disabled for FIX. The disconnect feature is mandatory and will cause the Participant to be disconnected within the default timeframe or the timeframe otherwise specified by the Participant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ NOM Market Makers utilizes both SQF and OTTO and would be subject to quoting obligations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This feature is consistent with the Act because it enables FIX or OTTO users, particularly non-Market Maker OTTO users, the ability to disconnect from the Exchange, assess the situation and make a determination concerning their risk exposure. The Exchange notes that in the event that orders need to be removed, the Participant may elect to utilize the Kill Switch \21\ feature. It is consistent with the Act to require other market participants to be disconnected because the Participant is otherwise not connected to the Exchange's System and the Participant simply needs to reconnect to commence submitting and cancelling orders. Requiring a disconnect when a loss of communication is detected is a rational course of action for the Exchange to alert the Participant of the technical connectivity issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See NOM Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(d). The Kill Switch would impact all three protocols, SQF, FIX and OTTO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's proposal to set a default timeframe of thirty (30) seconds for FIX and permit a FIX user to customize their timeframe between 1 second and 30 seconds for the removal of orders is consistent with the Act and the protection of investors because the purpose of this optional feature is to mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application. Participants selecting the removal feature are able to better anticipate the appropriate time that they require prior to a logoff as compared to the Exchange, within the Exchange's prescribed timeframes. The Exchange does not desire to trigger unwarranted logoffs of Participants and therefore permits Participants to provide a time to the Exchange, within the Exchange's prescribed timeframe, to authorize the Exchange to disconnect the Participant and remove orders. The ``nn'' seconds serve as the Participant's instruction to the Exchange to act upon the loss of connection and remove orders from the System. The Participant is also best positioned to determine that it only desires the disconnect feature, which is mandatory, and not the removal feature. The Exchange's proposal to offer FIX users the removal feature on a voluntary basis is similar to Phlx and BX.\22\ Both Phlx and BX have identical rules regarding FIX and a loss of communication as proposed for NOM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed timeframe for the FIX feature is consistent with the Act because the Exchange seeks to provide its Participants with the ability to select the amount of time that they desire for a loss of communication prior to taking action to cancel open orders or simply disconnect. The Participant should have the ability to select the appropriate time, within a prescribed timeframe, for authorizing the Exchange to cancel its open orders or simply disconnect from the Exchange. Inadvertent cancellations may create a greater risk of harm to investors and the Participant is better positioned to determine the appropriate time, with the prescribed timeframe, to remove orders or disconnect. With respect to OTTO Ports, the Exchange notes that it offers OTTO to all market participants, not just NOM Market Makers. Similar to SQF, the Exchange desires to utilize the 15 second default with the ability to customize the setting to permit a timeframe between 100 milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds. The Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to utilize the shorter timeframe of 15 seconds as compared to the 30 second timeframe for FIX because today, OTTO is utilized solely by NOM Market Makers, although it is offered to all Participants. OTTO orders submitted by NOM Market Makers over this interface are treated as quotes for purposes of compiling with quoting obligations. As noted previously, NOM Market Makers have quoting obligations \23\ and are more sensitive to price movements as compared to other market participants. NOM Market Makers need to remain vigilant of market conditions and react more quickly to market movements as compared to other Participants entering orders into the System. The proposal acknowledges this sensitivity borne by NOM Market Makers and reflects the reaction time of NOM Market Makers as compared to Participants entering orders. NOM Market Makers would be severely impacted by a loss of connectivity of more than several seconds. The NOM Market Makers would have exposure during the time period in which they are unable to manage their quote and update that quote. The Participant is best positioned to determine its setting. Also, the Exchange desires to offer NOM Market Makers the ability to have SQF quotes and OTTO orders removed with the same timeframes in order that NOM Market Makers may attend to all open interest in a similar manner with this risk feature. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See note 14 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that offering the shorter timeframe, despite the fact that non-Market Maker Participants are utilizing this feature is also consistent with the Act because the removal feature will not be mandatory. The disconnect feature for OTTO will be mandatory, however market participants will have the option to either enable or disable the removal feature, which would result in the cancellation of all orders submitted over an OTTO Port when such port disconnects. NOM Market Makers will be able to set a similar timeframe for both SQF and OTTO to ensure all open interest is removed simultaneously. The Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to permit OTTO users to disable the removal feature, similar to FIX, because the Exchange does not desire to require non-Market Maker Participants to have orders removed on mandatory basis. While the Exchange believes that this risk feature will mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application which protects investors and the public interest, as noted above, Participants are able to better anticipate the appropriate time within which they may require prior to a logoff as compared to the Exchange. The Exchange does not desire to trigger unwarranted logoffs of Participants and therefore permits [[Page 52931]] Participants to provide an alternative time to the Exchange, within the Exchange's prescribed timeframe, which authorized the Exchange to disconnect the Participant. The ``nn'' seconds serve as the Participant's instruction to the Exchange to act upon the loss of connection and remove quotes from the System. This range will accommodate Participants in selecting their appropriate times within the prescribed timeframes. The Exchange believes this hybrid approach will permit NOM Market Makers to synchronize the removal of their SQF quotes and OTTO orders,\24\ while still permitting non-Market Maker Participants the ability to choose to enable the risk feature. OTTO is not available on either Phlx or BX, so the OTTO feature is not similar to those markets, rather, as mentioned, it is a hybrid approach. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ NOM Market Makers may utilize both SQF and OTTO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is appropriate to offer this removal feature as optional to all Participants utilizing OTTO, who may not be required to provide quotes in all products in which they are registered. Non-Market Maker Participants utilizing OTTO may not bear the same magnitude of risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions as NOM Market Makers. In addition, non-Market Maker Participants utilizing OTTO may desire their orders to remain on the order book despite a technical disconnect, so as not to miss any opportunities for execution of such orders while the OTTO session is disconnected. OTTO is similar to FIX on Phlx and BX because it offers market participants, on a voluntary basis, the ability to cancel orders when a technical disconnect occurs.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's default timeframe for the disconnect and removal of orders for OTTO is 15 seconds with the ability to modify that timeframe to between 100 milliseconds and 99,999 milliseconds, on a session by session basis. This timeframe is similar to the SQF timeframe offered by Phlx and BX today.\26\ Similar to FIX on Phlx and BX today, OTTO users may choose to enable or disable the removal feature when a disconnect occurs. The proposed timeframe for the OTTO feature is consistent with the Act because the Exchange seeks to provide its Participants with the ability to select the amount of time that they desire for a loss of communication prior to taking action to cancel open orders or simply disconnect. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that Participants are free to select the protocols with which they desire to access NOM. The Exchange does not require Participants to utilize more than one protocol to access NOM. The proposed rule change will help maintain a fair and orderly market which promotes efficiency and protects investors. This mandatory removal feature for NOM Market Makers using SQF and optional removal for all market participants using FIX or OTTO will mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will cause an undue burden on intra-market competition because NOM Market Makers, unlike other market participants, have greater risks in the market place. Quoting across many series in an option creates large principal positions that expose NOM Market Makers, who are required to continuously quote in assigned options, to potentially significant market risk. Providing a broader timeframe for the disconnect and removal of orders for FIX as compared to the disconnect and removal of quotes for SQF Ports does not create an undue burden on competition. NOM Market Makers have quoting obligations \27\ and are more sensitive to price movements as compared to other market participants. The proposal does not impose an undue burden on intra-market competition because it provides a tighter timeframe for the disconnect and removal of quotes for SQF Ports as compared to the disconnect and removal of orders, if enabled, for FIX Ports. NOM Market Makers need to remain vigilant of market conditions and react more quickly to market movements as compared to other Participants entering multiple orders into the System. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See note 14 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposal reflects this sensitivity borne by NOM Market Makers and reflects the reaction time of NOM Market Makers as compared to other Participants entering orders. Offering the removal feature to other market participants on an optional basis for FIX and OTTO users does not create an undue burden on intra-market competition because unlike NOM Market Makers, other market participants do not bear the same risks of potential erroneous or unintended executions. FIX users have the opportunity to disable the removal feature and simply disconnect from the Exchange. FIX users may also set a timeframe that is appropriate for their business. It is appropriate to offer this optional cancellation functionality to other market participants for open orders, because those orders are subject to risks of missed and/or unintended executions due to a lack of connectivity which the Participants need to weigh. Today, OTTO is utilized solely by NOM Market Makers, although it is offered to all Participants. OTTO Orders submitted by NOM Market Makers over this interface are treated as quotes for purposes of compiling with quoting obligations. NOM Market Makers have quoting obligations \28\ and are more sensitive to price movements as compared to other market participants. NOM Market Makers need to remain vigilant of market conditions and react more quickly to market movements as compared to other Participants entering orders into the System. For this reason, the proposal does not impose an undue burden on intra- market competition because the proposal acknowledges this sensitivity borne by NOM Market Makers and reflects the reaction time of NOM Market Makers as compared to Participants entering orders. As noted, NOM Market Makers would be severely impacted by a loss of connectivity of more than several seconds. NOM Market Makers would have exposure during the time period in which they are unable to manage their quote and update that quote. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See note 14 above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's proposal offers NOM Market Makers the ability to have SQF and OTTO orders removed within the same timeframes in order that NOM Market Makers may attend to all open interest in a similar manner with this risk feature. The Exchange notes that offering the shorter timeframe, despite the fact that non-Market Maker Participants may utilize this feature does not impose an undue burden on intra- market competition because the removal feature will not be mandatory. The disconnect feature for OTTO will be mandatory, however market participants will have the option to either enable or disable removal feature, which would result in the cancellation of all orders submitted over an OTTO Port when such port disconnects. [[Page 52932]] The Exchange believes that it does not impose an undue burden on intra-market competition to permit OTTO users to disable the removal feature, similar to FIX, because the Exchange does not desire to require non-Market Maker Participants to have orders removed on mandatory basis. While the Exchange believes that this risk feature will mitigate the risk of potential erroneous or unintended executions associated with a loss in communication with a Client Application which protects investors and the public interest, as noted above, Participants are able to better anticipate the appropriate time within which they may require prior to a logoff as compared to the Exchange. The Exchange does not desire to trigger unwarranted logoffs of Participants and therefore permits Participants to provide an alternative time to the Exchange, within the Exchange's prescribed timeframe, which authorized the Exchange to disconnect the Participant. This hybrid approach will permit NOM Market Makers to synchronize the removal of their SQF quotes and OTTO orders, while still permitting non-NOM Market Makers the ability to choose to enable the risk feature. Finally, the Exchange does not believe that such change will impose any burden on inter-market competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Other options exchanges offer similar functionality.\29\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ See BOX's Rule 8140, CBOE's Rule 6.23C, Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \30\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii). \31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \32\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that it may immediately offer the proposed risk protection feature. The Commission believes that waiving the 30- day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange proposes to adopt a functionality designed to assist Participants with managing certain risks in the event that a Participant loses communication with its FIX, SQF, or OTTO Ports due to a loss of connectivity. The Commission notes that other options exchanges currently have similar risk protection functionalities for their members.\33\ Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.\34\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). \33\ See Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 6(e). \34\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-097 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-097. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-097 and should be submitted on or before August 31, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-18911 Filed 8-9-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![52926 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
the basis for the Fund’s calculation of 7. Applicants request an exemption to Fund, to sell shares of the Master Fund
NAV at the end of the day. permit Funds of Funds to acquire Fund to the Feeder Fund beyond the
3. Shares will be purchased and shares beyond the limits of section limitations in section 12(d)(1)(B).
redeemed in Creation Units and 12(d)(1)(A) of the Act; and the Funds, 10. Section 6(c) of the Act permits the
generally on an in-kind basis. Except and any principal underwriter for the Commission to exempt any persons or
where the purchase or redemption will Funds, and/or any broker or dealer transactions from any provision of the
include cash under the limited registered under the Exchange Act, to Act if such exemption is necessary or
circumstances specified in the sell shares to Funds of Funds beyond appropriate in the public interest and
application, purchasers will be required the limits of section 12(d)(1)(B) of the consistent with the protection of
to purchase Creation Units by Act. The application’s terms and investors and the purposes fairly
depositing specified instruments conditions are designed to, among other intended by the policy and provisions of
(‘‘Deposit Instruments’’), and things, help prevent any potential (i) the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act
shareholders redeeming their shares undue influence over a Fund through provides that the Commission may
will receive specified instruments control or voting power, or in exempt any person, security, or
(‘‘Redemption Instruments’’). The connection with certain services, transaction, or any class or classes of
Deposit Instruments and the transactions, and underwritings, (ii) persons, securities, or transactions, from
Redemption Instruments will each excessive layering of fees, and (iii) any provision of section 12(d)(1) if the
correspond pro rata to the positions in overly complex fund structures, which exemption is consistent with the public
the Fund’s portfolio (including cash are the concerns underlying the limits interest and the protection of investors.
positions) except as specified in the in sections 12(d)(1)(A) and (B) of the Section 17(b) of the Act authorizes the
application. Act. Commission to grant an order
4. Because shares will not be 8. Applicants request an exemption permitting a transaction otherwise
individually redeemable, applicants from sections 17(a)(1) and 17(a)(2) of the prohibited by section 17(a) if it finds
request an exemption from section Act to permit persons that are Affiliated that (a) the terms of the proposed
5(a)(1) and section 2(a)(32) of the Act Persons, or Second Tier Affiliates, of the transaction are fair and reasonable and
that would permit the Funds to register Funds, solely by virtue of certain do not involve overreaching on the part
as open-end management investment ownership interests, to effectuate of any person concerned; (b) the
companies and issue shares that are purchases and redemptions in-kind. The proposed transaction is consistent with
redeemable in Creation Units only. deposit procedures for in-kind the policies of each registered
5. Applicants also request an purchases of Creation Units and the investment company involved; and (c)
exemption from section 22(d) of the Act redemption procedures for in-kind the proposed transaction is consistent
and rule 22c–1 under the Act as redemptions of Creation Units will be with the general purposes of the Act.
secondary market trading in shares will the same for all purchases and
take place at negotiated prices, not at a redemptions and Deposit Instruments For the Commission, by the Division of
current offering price described in a and Redemption Instruments will be Investment Management, under delegated
Fund’s prospectus, and not at a price authority.
valued in the same manner as those
based on NAV. Applicants state that (a) Portfolio Holdings currently held by the Robert W. Errett,
secondary market trading in shares does Funds. Applicants also seek relief from Deputy Secretary.
not involve a Fund as a party and will the prohibitions on affiliated [FR Doc. 2016–18914 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
not result in dilution of an investment transactions in section 17(a) to permit a BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
in shares, and (b) to the extent different Fund to sell its shares to and redeem its
prices exist during a given trading day, shares from a Fund of Funds, and to
or from day to day, such variances occur engage in the accompanying in-kind SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
as a result of third-party market forces, transactions with the Fund of Funds.2 COMMISSION
such as supply and demand. Therefore, The purchase of Creation Units by a [Release No. 34–78480; File No. SR–
applicants assert that secondary market Fund of Funds directly from a Fund will NASDAQ–2016–097]
transactions in shares will not lead to be accomplished in accordance with the
discrimination or preferential treatment policies of the Fund of Funds and will Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
among purchasers. Finally, applicants be based on the NAVs of the Funds. NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
represent that share market prices will 9. Applicants also request relief to Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
be disciplined by arbitrage permit a Feeder Fund to acquire shares Proposed Rule Change Related to
opportunities, which should prevent of another registered investment Detection of Loss of Connection
shares from trading at a material company managed by the Adviser
discount or premium from NAV. having substantially the same August 4, 2016.
6. With respect to Funds that hold investment objectives as the Feeder Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
non-U.S. Portfolio Holdings and that Fund (‘‘Master Fund’’) beyond the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
effect creations and redemptions of limitations in section 12(d)(1)(A) and (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2
Creation Units in kind, applicants permit the Master Fund, and any notice is hereby given that on July 28,
request relief from the requirement principal underwriter for the Master 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
imposed by section 22(e) in order to (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
allow such Funds to pay redemption 2 The requested relief would apply to direct sales
Securities and Exchange Commission
proceeds within fifteen calendar days of shares in Creation Units by a Fund to a Fund of
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
Funds and redemptions of those shares. Applicants,
following the tender of Creation Units moreover, are not seeking relief from section 17(a) rule change as described in Items I and
for redemption. Applicants assert that for, and the requested relief will not apply to, II, below, which Items have been
the requested relief would not be transactions where a Fund could be deemed an prepared by the Exchange. The
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of Affiliated Person, or a Second-Tier Affiliate, of a Commission is publishing this notice to
Fund of Funds because an Adviser or an entity
section 22(e) to prevent unreasonable, controlling, controlled by or under common control
undisclosed or unforeseen delays in the with an Adviser provides investment advisory 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
actual payment of redemption proceeds. services to that Fund of Funds. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Aug 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53080/page/1.svg)
![52932 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
The Exchange believes that it does not A proposed rule change filed under • Send an email to rule-
impose an undue burden on intra- Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not comments@sec.gov. Please include File
market competition to permit OTTO become operative for 30 days from the Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–097 on the
users to disable the removal feature, date of filing. However, Rule 19b– subject line.
similar to FIX, because the Exchange 4(f)(6)(iii) 32 permits the Commission to
does not desire to require non-Market designate a shorter time if such action Paper Comments
Maker Participants to have orders is consistent with the protection of • Send paper comments in triplicate
removed on mandatory basis. While the investors and the public interest. The
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Exchange believes that this risk feature Exchange has asked the Commission to
will mitigate the risk of potential Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
erroneous or unintended executions Washington, DC 20549–1090.
it may immediately offer the proposed
associated with a loss in communication risk protection feature. The Commission All submissions should refer to File
with a Client Application which believes that waiving the 30-day Number SR–NASDAQ–2016–097. This
protects investors and the public operative delay is consistent with the file number should be included on the
interest, as noted above, Participants are protection of investors and the public subject line if email is used. To help the
able to better anticipate the appropriate interest. The Exchange proposes to Commission process and review your
time within which they may require adopt a functionality designed to assist comments more efficiently, please use
prior to a logoff as compared to the Participants with managing certain risks only one method. The Commission will
Exchange. in the event that a Participant loses
The Exchange does not desire to post all comments on the Commission’s
communication with its FIX, SQF, or Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
trigger unwarranted logoffs of OTTO Ports due to a loss of
Participants and therefore permits rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
connectivity. The Commission notes
Participants to provide an alternative submission, all subsequent
that other options exchanges currently
time to the Exchange, within the amendments, all written statements
have similar risk protection
Exchange’s prescribed timeframe, which with respect to the proposed rule
functionalities for their members.33
authorized the Exchange to disconnect Therefore, the Commission hereby change that are filed with the
the Participant. This hybrid approach waives the 30-day operative delay and Commission, and all written
will permit NOM Market Makers to designates the proposal operative upon communications relating to the
synchronize the removal of their SQF filing.34 At any time within 60 days of proposed rule change between the
quotes and OTTO orders, while still the filing of the proposed rule change, Commission and any person, other than
permitting non-NOM Market Makers the the Commission summarily may those that may be withheld from the
ability to choose to enable the risk temporarily suspend such rule change if public in accordance with the
feature. it appears to the Commission that such provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Finally, the Exchange does not believe available for Web site viewing and
action is necessary or appropriate in the
that such change will impose any printing in the Commission’s Public
public interest, for the protection of
burden on inter-market competition that
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
is not necessary or appropriate in
the purposes of the Act. If the Washington, DC 20549, on official
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Commission takes such action, the business days between the hours of
Other options exchanges offer similar
Commission shall institute proceedings 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
functionality.29
to determine whether the proposed rule filing also will be available for
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s should be approved or disapproved. inspection and copying at the principal
Statement on Comments on the office of the Exchange. All comments
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Proposed Rule Change Received From received will be posted without change;
Members, Participants, or Others Interested persons are invited to the Commission does not edit personal
No written comments were either submit written data, views, and identifying information from
solicited or received. arguments concerning the foregoing, submissions. You should submit only
including whether the proposed rule information that you wish to make
III. Date of Effectiveness of the change is consistent with the Act.
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for available publicly. All submissions
Comments may be submitted by any of should refer to File Number SR–
Commission Action the following methods: NASDAQ–2016–097 and should be
Because the foregoing proposed rule
Electronic Comments submitted on or before August 31, 2016.
change does not: (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public For the Commission, by the Division of
• Use the Commission’s Internet
interest; (ii) impose any significant Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
burden on competition; and (iii) become authority.35
rules/sro.shtml); or
operative for 30 days from the date on Robert W. Errett,
which it was filed, or such shorter time the Commission written notice of its intent to file Deputy Secretary.
as the Commission may designate, it has the proposed rule change at least five business days [FR Doc. 2016–18911 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
become effective pursuant to Section prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 30 and change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
requirement.
thereunder.31 32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
33 See Phlx Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter
29 See BOX’s Rule 8140, CBOE’s Rule 6.23C, Phlx
VI, Section 6(e).
Rule 1019(c) and BX Rule at Chapter VI, Section 34 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
6(e). operative delay, the Commission has also
30 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
31 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Aug 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53080/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-10 01:59:34
Document Modified: 2016-08-10 01:59:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 52926 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR