81 FR 59139 - Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Approval of Single Source Orders
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 167 (August 29, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 167 (August 29, 2016)
| Page Range | 59139-59141 | |
| FR Document | 2016-20538 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 59139-59141] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-20538] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2013-0260; A-1-FRL-9951-46-Region 1] Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Approval of Single Source Orders AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of New Hampshire. The revisions consist of single source orders that establish reasonably available control technology for three sources of volatile organic compounds. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective October 28, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by September 28, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2013-0260 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Anne Arnold at: [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob McConnell, Environmental Engineer, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912; (617) 918-1046; [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this preamble. I. Background and Purpose II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittals 1. Order for Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2. Order for Textile Tapes Corporation 3. Order for Watts Regulator Corporation III. Final Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background and Purpose The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) submitted to EPA the following three single source orders establishing reasonably available control technology (RACT) for sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for incorporation into the New Hampshire SIP: RACT Order ARD-03-001A, issued to Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Chomerics Division, located in Hudson, New Hampshire, submitted to EPA on October 31, 2014; RACT Order ARD-96-001, issued to Textile Tapes Corporation located in Gonic, New Hampshire, submitted to EPA on July 30, 2015; and RACT Order ARD-07-001, issued to Watts Regulator Company located in Franklin, New Hampshire, submitted to EPA on September 9, 2015. A description of these submittals and our evaluation of them appears below in Section II of this document. II. Description and Evaluation of the State's Submittals 1. Order for Parker-Hannifin Corporation The Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Chomerics Division, located in Hudson, New Hampshire, produces coated fabrics, films, and other substrates for use in the electronics industry. The NH DES previously issued VOC RACT Order ARD 03-001 to the facility on July 18, 2002, and EPA approved that order into the NH SIP on November 5, 2012. See 77 FR 66388. NH DES re-issued the order for this facility as ARD 03-001A to allow for modifications to monitoring requirements, testing frequency, and determination of destruction and removal efficiency for a catalytic oxidizer operated by the facility to control air pollution. New Hampshire DES determined that these changes were appropriate after reviewing the performance history of the oxidizer. VOC RACT Order ARD 03-001A was issued by the NH DES on October 22, 2014, and establishes enforceable requirements the facility must follow in order to control VOC emissions at the facility. The Order includes requirements for periodic monitoring of the catalytic oxidizer's performance, recordkeeping requirements, work practice standards, and allows the facility to generate and use discrete emission reduction credits. 2. Order for Textile Tapes Corporation The Textile Tapes Corporation operates a fabric coating and hot melt coating facility located in Gonic, New Hampshire. The NH DES previously issued VOC RACT Order ARD-96-001 to the facility, with a state effective date of August 10, 2007, which EPA approved into the New Hampshire SIP on November 5, 2012. See 77 FR 66388. Subsequently, the facility installed a new regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to replace an existing unit at the facility. The updated VOC RACT order for the facility, ARD-96-001, as amended on July 30, 2015, contains an updated operating temperature for the new RTO. Additionally, the updated VOC RACT order provides a facility wide VOC emissions limit of 24.9 tons on a 12 month rolling basis, which is a decrease from the previous limit of 63.8 tons. The updated order makes a number of editorial changes to reflect the current citations for New Hampshire's air pollution control regulations, includes requirements for monitoring and testing for the RTO, includes recordkeeping requirements, and allows the facility to generate and use discrete emission reduction credits. 3. Order for Watts Regulator Company The Watts Regulator Company manufactures equipment for the plumbing, heating, and water quality industries at a facility located in Franklin, New Hampshire. The NH DES previously issued VOC RACT Order ARD-07-001 to the facility, which was then operated under the name Webster [[Page 59140]] Valve Company, with a state effective date of March 21, 2007. EPA approved this order into the NH SIP on November 5, 2012. See 77 FR 66388. NH DES amended the order for this facility in 2015 to reflect the pending applicability of a newly adopted state VOC regulation, Env- A 1212, Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts and Products Coating, to coatings used by the facility, and to include work practice standards to the order. The order includes recordkeeping requirements, and allows the facility to generate and use discrete emission reduction credits. EPA agrees with New Hampshire's updated RACT determinations for the three sources mentioned above, and is therefore removing the existing orders for these facilities from the New Hampshire SIP and replacing them with the updated orders described above. The updated orders we are approving are at least as stringent as the orders being replaced, and therefore meet the anti-backsliding requirements of section 110(l) of the CAA. III. Final Action EPA is approving, and incorporating into the New Hampshire SIP, three single source orders that establish reasonably available control technology for the Parker-Hannifin Corporation, the Textile Tapes Corporation, and the Watts Regulator Company, and is removing previously approved orders for these three facilities from the New Hampshire SIP. The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective October 28, 2016 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by September 28, 2016. If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on October 28, 2016 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of single source orders for the Parker Hannifin Corporation, Textile Tapes Corporation, and Watts Regulator Company, as described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801. Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 28, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with [[Page 59141]] objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: August 15, 2016. H. Curtis Spalding, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart EE--New Hampshire 0 2. In Sec. 52.1520(d), the table is amended by removing existing entries for Parker-Hanifan Corporation, Textile Tapes Corporation (2 entries), and Webster Valve, and adding new entries for Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Textile Tapes Corporation, and Watts Regulator Company to the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.1520 Identification of plan. * * * * * (d) EPA-approved State Source specific requirements. EPA-Approved New Hampshire Source Specific Requirements ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State EPA approval Additional explanations/ Name of source Permit No. effective date date \2\ Sec. 52.1535 citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Parker-Hannifin Corporation.. ARD 03-001A 10/22/2014 8/29/2016 VOC RACT Order. [Insert Federal Register citation]. Textile Tapes Corporation.... ARD-96-001 7/30/2015 8/29/2016 VOC RACT Order. [Insert Federal Register citation]. Watts Regulator Company...... ARD 07-001 8/21/2015 8/29/2016 VOC RACT Order. [Insert Federal Register citation]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * \2\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-20538 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 59139
interest therein, for any purpose contact the person identified in the FOR DES previously issued VOC RACT
authorized by 38 U.S.C., chapter 37. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Order ARD 03–001 to the facility on July
* * * * * For the full EPA public comment policy, 18, 2002, and EPA approved that order
[FR Doc. 2016–20499 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am] information about CBI or multimedia into the NH SIP on November 5, 2012.
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P submissions, and general guidance on See 77 FR 66388. NH DES re-issued the
making effective comments, please visit order for this facility as ARD 03–001A
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ to allow for modifications to monitoring
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION commenting-epa-dockets. requirements, testing frequency, and
AGENCY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob determination of destruction and
McConnell, Environmental Engineer, removal efficiency for a catalytic
40 CFR Part 52 Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs oxidizer operated by the facility to
Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S. control air pollution. New Hampshire
[EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0260; A–1–FRL– DES determined that these changes were
9951–46–Region 1] Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite appropriate after reviewing the
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109–3912; performance history of the oxidizer.
Approval of Single Source Orders (617) 918–1046; mcconnell.robert@ VOC RACT Order ARD 03–001A was
epa.gov. issued by the NH DES on October 22,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection 2014, and establishes enforceable
Agency (EPA). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: requirements the facility must follow in
Throughout this document whenever order to control VOC emissions at the
ACTION: Direct final rule.
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean facility. The Order includes
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection EPA. requirements for periodic monitoring of
Agency (EPA) is approving State Organization of this document. The the catalytic oxidizer’s performance,
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions following outline is provided to aid in recordkeeping requirements, work
submitted by the State of New locating information in this preamble. practice standards, and allows the
Hampshire. The revisions consist of I. Background and Purpose facility to generate and use discrete
single source orders that establish II. Description and Evaluation of the State’s emission reduction credits.
reasonably available control technology Submittals
1. Order for Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2. Order for Textile Tapes Corporation
for three sources of volatile organic
2. Order for Textile Tapes Corporation The Textile Tapes Corporation
compounds. This action is being taken
3. Order for Watts Regulator Corporation operates a fabric coating and hot melt
in accordance with the Clean Air Act. III. Final Action coating facility located in Gonic, New
DATES: This direct final rule will be IV. Incorporation by Reference
Hampshire. The NH DES previously
effective October 28, 2016, unless EPA V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
issued VOC RACT Order ARD–96–001
receives adverse comments by
I. Background and Purpose to the facility, with a state effective date
September 28, 2016. If adverse
The New Hampshire Department of of August 10, 2007, which EPA
comments are received, EPA will
Environmental Services (NH DES) approved into the New Hampshire SIP
publish a timely withdrawal of the
submitted to EPA the following three on November 5, 2012. See 77 FR 66388.
direct final rule in the Federal Register Subsequently, the facility installed a
informing the public that the rule will single source orders establishing
reasonably available control technology new regenerative thermal oxidizer
not take effect. (RTO) to replace an existing unit at the
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, (RACT) for sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) for incorporation facility. The updated VOC RACT order
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– for the facility, ARD–96–001, as
OAR–2013–0260 at http:// into the New Hampshire SIP: RACT
Order ARD–03–001A, issued to Parker- amended on July 30, 2015, contains an
www.regulations.gov, or via email to updated operating temperature for the
Anne Arnold at: arnold.anne@epa.gov. Hannifin Corporation, Chomerics
Division, located in Hudson, New new RTO. Additionally, the updated
For comments submitted at VOC RACT order provides a facility
Regulations.gov, follow the online Hampshire, submitted to EPA on
October 31, 2014; RACT Order ARD– wide VOC emissions limit of 24.9 tons
instructions for submitting comments. on a 12 month rolling basis, which is a
Once submitted, comments cannot be 96–001, issued to Textile Tapes
Corporation located in Gonic, New decrease from the previous limit of 63.8
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. tons. The updated order makes a
For either manner of submission, the Hampshire, submitted to EPA on July
30, 2015; and RACT Order ARD–07– number of editorial changes to reflect
EPA may publish any comment received the current citations for New
to its public docket. Do not submit 001, issued to Watts Regulator Company
located in Franklin, New Hampshire, Hampshire’s air pollution control
electronically any information you regulations, includes requirements for
consider to be Confidential Business submitted to EPA on September 9, 2015.
A description of these submittals and monitoring and testing for the RTO,
Information (CBI) or other information includes recordkeeping requirements,
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. our evaluation of them appears below in
Section II of this document. and allows the facility to generate and
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, use discrete emission reduction credits.
etc.) must be accompanied by a written II. Description and Evaluation of the
comment. The written comment is 3. Order for Watts Regulator Company
State’s Submittals
considered the official comment and The Watts Regulator Company
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
should include discussion of all points 1. Order for Parker-Hannifin manufactures equipment for the
you wish to make. The EPA will Corporation plumbing, heating, and water quality
generally not consider comments or The Parker-Hannifin Corporation, industries at a facility located in
comment contents located outside of the Chomerics Division, located in Hudson, Franklin, New Hampshire. The NH DES
primary submission (i.e. on the web, New Hampshire, produces coated previously issued VOC RACT Order
cloud, or other file sharing system). For fabrics, films, and other substrates for ARD–07–001 to the facility, which was
additional submission methods, please use in the electronics industry. The NH then operated under the name Webster
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Aug 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_59306/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 167 / Monday, August 29, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 59141
objections to this direct final rule are List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
encouraged to file a comment in Environmental protection, Air
response to the parallel notice of Subpart EE—New Hampshire
pollution control, Incorporation by
proposed rulemaking for this action reference, Ozone, Reporting and ■ 2. In § 52.1520(d), the table is
published in the proposed rules section recordkeeping requirements, Volatile amended by removing existing entries
of today’s Federal Register, rather than organic compounds. for Parker-Hanifan Corporation, Textile
file an immediate petition for judicial Dated: August 15, 2016. Tapes Corporation (2 entries), and
review of this direct final rule, so that H. Curtis Spalding, Webster Valve, and adding new entries
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule Regional Administrator, EPA New England. for Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Textile
and address the comment in the Tapes Corporation, and Watts Regulator
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
proposed rulemaking. This action may Company to the end of the table to read
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
not be challenged later in proceedings to as follows:
as follows:
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).) § 52.1520 Identification of plan.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
* * * * *
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 (d) EPA-approved State Source
continues to read as follows: specific requirements.
EPA-APPROVED NEW HAMPSHIRE SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Additional
State effective
Name of source Permit No. EPA approval date 2 explanations/
date § 52.1535 citation
* * * * * * *
Parker-Hannifin Corporation .......................................... ARD 03–001A 10/22/2014 8/29/2016 [Insert Federal VOC RACT Order.
Register citation].
Textile Tapes Corporation ............................................. ARD–96–001 7/30/2015 8/29/2016 [Insert Federal VOC RACT Order.
Register citation].
Watts Regulator Company ............................................. ARD 07–001 8/21/2015 8/29/2016 [Insert Federal VOC RACT Order.
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
2
In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this col-
umn for the particular provision.
* * * * * The Commission is also lowering fees current user fees no longer represent the
[FR Doc. 2016–20538 Filed 8–26–16; 8:45 am] for: Reviewing Freedom of Information Commission’s actual costs for providing
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Act (FOIA) requests; revising clerical services. The Commission is adjusting
errors on service contracts; revising its user fees based on fiscal year 2015
clerical errors on non-vessel-operating costs assessed through a new
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION common carrier (NVOCC) service methodology for calculating costs for
arrangements; and Commission services services provided by the Commission.
46 CFR Parts 502, 503, 515, 520, 530, to passenger vessel operators (PVOs). The Independent Offices
531, 535, 540, 550, 555, and 560 In addition, the Commission is Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA), 31
repealing four existing fees for: Adding U.S.C. 9701, authorizes agencies to
[Docket No. 16–06] interested parties to a specific docket establish charges (user fees) for services
mailing list; the Regulated Persons and benefits that it provides to specific
RIN 3072–AC34
Index database; database reports on recipients. Under the IOAA, charges
Update of Existing and Addition of Effective Carrier Agreements; and filing must be fair and based on the costs to
New User Fees petitions for rulemaking, and adding a the Government, the value of the service
new fee for requests for expedited or thing to the recipient, the public
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission. review of an agreement filing. policy or interest served, and other
ACTION: Final rule. DATES: Effective October 1, 2016. relevant facts. The IOAA also provides
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: that regulations implementing user fees
SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal are subject to policies prescribed by the
Commission (Commission) is amending Maritime Commission, 800 North President, which are currently set forth
its user fees to more accurately align Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC in OMB Circular A–25, User Charges
fees with the costs associated with each 20573–0001. Phone: (202) 523–5725. (revised July 8, 1993).
service provided by the Commission. Email: secretary@fmc.gov. OMB Circular A–25 requires agencies
Specifically, the Commission is to conduct a periodic reassessment of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
increasing fees for: Filing complaints costs and, if necessary, adjust or
Commission’s current user fees are
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
and certain petitions; records searches, establish new fees. Under OMB Circular
based on an assessment of fiscal year
document copying, and admissions to A–25, fees should be established for
2004 costs and have not been updated
practice; paper filing of ocean Government-provided services that
since 2005.1 Consequently, many of the
transportation intermediary (OTI) confer benefits on identifiable recipients
applications; filing applications for 1 The Commission established the fee for filing or over and above those benefits received
special permission; and filing updating OTI license applications electronically in by the general public. OMB Circular A–
agreements. 2007. 25 also provides that agencies should
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Aug 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29AUR1.SGM 29AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_59306/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-26 23:50:26
Document Modified: 2016-08-26 23:50:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective October 28, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by September 28, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Bob McConnell, Environmental Engineer, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912; (617) 918-1046; [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 59139 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR