81 FR 742 - Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 4 (January 7, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 4 (January 7, 2016)
| Page Range | 742-744 | |
| FR Document | 2016-00078 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 742-744] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-00078] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-810] Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from Petitioners and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH), the Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded ASTM A-312 stainless steel pipe from Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2013, through November 30, 2014. The review covers two exporters and/or producers of the subject merchandise, SeAH and LS Metal Co., Ltd. (LS Metal). The Department preliminarily finds that SeAH and LS Metal sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Petitioners are Bristol Metals LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless Pipe, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2316. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is welded austenitic stainless steel pipe that meets [[Page 743]] the standards and specifications set forth by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) for the welded form of chromium-nickel pipe designated ASTM A-312. The merchandise covered by the scope of the orders also includes austenitic welded stainless steel pipes made according to the standards of other nations which are comparable to ASTM A-312. Imports of welded ASTM A-312 stainless steel pipe are currently classifiable under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5015, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085. Although these subheadings include both pipes and tubes, the scope of the antidumping duty order is limited to welded austenitic stainless steel pipes. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. However, the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded ASTM A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; 2013-2014, dated concurrently with this notice for a full description of the scope of the order (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. With respect to LS Metal, we relied on facts available,\3\ and, because it did not act to the best of its ability to respond to the Department's requests for information, we drew an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See section 776(a) of the Act. \4\ See section 776(b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the Department's main building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins for the period December 1, 2013, through November 30, 2014. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Producer and/or exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SeAH Steel Corporation.................................. 2.58 LS Metal Co., Ltd....................................... 31.70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days after the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review and may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\8\ An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the on which it is due.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d). \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \7\ Id. \8\ See 19 CFR 351.303. \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined. See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. We intend to issue the final results of this administrative review within 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise extended.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respondent's weighted- average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of this review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews) (``Where the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003.\12\ This clarification applies to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by a respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the [[Page 744]] intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of welded ASTM A-312 stainless steel pipe from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review except if that rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than- fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the ``all-others'' rate of 6.83 percent established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\13\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Antidumping Duty Order and Clarification of Final Determination: Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipes From Korea, 57 FR 62301, 62302 (December 30, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 21, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of Methodology A. Comparisons to Fair Value B. Date of Sale C. Product Comparisons D. Constructed Export Price E. SeAH's Alleged Affiliation With POSCO Based on Close Supplier Relationship F. Normal Value G. Cost of Production Analysis H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices I. Currency Conversion J. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inferences Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-00078 Filed 1-6-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![742 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 4 / Thursday, January 7, 2016 / Notices
(‘‘PRC’’) 1 would be likely to lead to Analysis of Comments Received APO is a violation which is subject to
continuation or recurrence of dumping A complete discussion of all issues sanction.
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final raised in this sunset review is available Notification to Interested Parties
Results of Review’’ section of this in the Issues and Decision
notice. We are issuing and publishing the
Memorandum for the Expedited Fourth
DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2016. results and notice in accordance with
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
Order on Potassium Permanganate from
Walker, AD/CVD Operations, the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
the PRC (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’),
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice. The Dated: December 30, 2015.
International Trade Administration, issues discussed in the Decision Paul Piquado,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Memorandum include the likelihood of Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., continuation or recurrence of dumping Compliance.
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) and the magnitude of the margins of [FR Doc. 2016–00079 Filed 1–6–16; 8:45 am]
482–0413. dumping likely to prevail if the order BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: were to be revoked. The Decision
Background Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The Department published the Enforcement and Compliance
antidumping duty order on potassium Antidumping and Countervailing Duty International Trade Administration
permanganate from the PRC on January Centralized Electronic Services System [A–580–810]
31, 1984.2 On September 1, 2015, the (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to
Department published a notice of registered users at http:// Welded ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel
initiation of the fourth sunset review of access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Pipe From the Republic of Korea:
the antidumping duty order on Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of Preliminary Results of Antidumping
potassium permanganate from the PRC the main Department of Commerce Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff building. In addition, a complete 2014
Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).3 version of the Decision Memorandum
On September 9, 2015, Carus can be accessed at http:// AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Corporation (‘‘Carus’’), a U.S. producer International Trade Administration,
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
of potassium permanganate, claiming Department of Commerce.
Decision Memorandum and the
interested party status under section SUMMARY: In response to requests from
electronic version of the Decision
771(9)(C) of the Act, submitted its notice Petitioners and SeAH Steel Corporation
Memorandum are identical in content.
of intent to participate in this sunset (SeAH), the Department of Commerce
review.4 On September 29, 2015, Carus Final Results of Review (Department) is conducting an
submitted its Substantive Response Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and administrative review of the
within the 30-day deadline specified in 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the antidumping duty order on welded
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department determines that revocation ASTM A–312 stainless steel pipe from
Department did not receive a of the antidumping duty order on Republic of Korea (Korea).1 The period
substantive response from any of review (POR) is December 1, 2013,
potassium permanganate from the PRC
respondent interested party. As a result, through November 30, 2014. The review
would be likely to lead to continuation
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the covers two exporters and/or producers
or recurrence of dumping, and the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), of the subject merchandise, SeAH and
magnitude of the margins of dumping
the Department conducted an expedited LS Metal Co., Ltd. (LS Metal). The
likely to prevail is up to 128.94
(120-day) sunset review of the Department preliminarily finds that
percent.5
antidumping duty order on potassium SeAH and LS Metal sold subject
permanganate from the PRC. Administrative Protective Order merchandise at less than normal value
Scope of the Order This notice also serves as the only during the POR. We invite interested
Imports covered by this order are reminder to parties subject to parties to comment on these preliminary
shipments of potassium permanganate, administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) results.
an inorganic chemical produced in free- of their responsibility concerning the DATES: Effective Date: January 7, 2016.
flowing, technical, and pharmaceutical return or destruction of proprietary FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
grades. Potassium permanganate is information disclosed under APO in Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations,
currently classifiable under item accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Office VII, Enforcement and
2841.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Timely written notification of the return Compliance, International Trade
Schedule of the United States or destruction of APO materials, or Administration, U.S. Department of
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS item conversion to judicial protective order, Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
number is provided for convenience and is hereby requested. Failure to comply Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
customs purposes, the written with the regulations and terms of an telephone: (202) 482–2316.
description of the merchandise remains SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
5 See Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review:
dispositive.
Potassium Permanganate from the People’s Scope of the Order
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Republic of China; 64 FR 16907 (April 7, 1999); see
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Potassium also Potassium Permanganate from the People’s The merchandise subject to the
Permanganate from The People’s Republic of Republic of China; Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of
China, 49 FR 3897 (January 31, 1984). antidumping duty order is welded
Antidumping Duty Order; Final Results, 70 FR
2 Id.
24520 (May 10, 2005); see also Potassium austenitic stainless steel pipe that meets
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
Permanganate from the People’s Republic of China:
FR 52743 (September 1, 2015). Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of 1 Petitioners are Bristol Metals LLC, Felker
4 See Letter from the domestic interested party Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 52509 (August 26, Brothers Corporation, and Outokumpu Stainless
(September 9, 2015). 2010). Pipe, Inc.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_746/page/1.svg)
![744 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 4 / Thursday, January 7, 2016 / Notices
intermediate company(ies) involved in Notification to Interested Parties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the transaction. These preliminary results of
We intend to issue instructions to Agenda
administrative review are issued and
CBP 15 days after publication of the The Risk Policy Working Group will
published in accordance with sections
final results of this review. discuss the implementation and
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
application of the Council’s Risk Policy
Cash Deposit Requirements CFR 351.213(h). across all Council-managed species;
The following cash deposit Dated: December 21, 2015. review updated matrix of ‘‘baseline
requirements will be effective upon Paul Piquado, conditions’’ for Council-managed
publication of the notice of final results Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and species, i.e., how risk and uncertainty
of administrative review for all Compliance. are currently addressed; discuss
shipments of welded ASTM A–312 baseline conditions in the Atlantic
Appendix
stainless steel pipe from Korea entered, herring fishery; review available
or withdrawn from warehouse, for List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary information and begin to develop
consumption on or after the date of Decision Memorandum recommendations regarding the
publication as provided for by section Summary application of the Risk Policy in the
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash Background Atlantic Herring FMP; discuss baseline
deposit rate for the companies under Scope of the Order conditions in the Atlantic sea scallop
review will be equal to the weighted- Discussion of Methodology fishery; plan future work and address
average dumping margin established in A. Comparisons to Fair Value
other business as necessary.
B. Date of Sale
the final results of this review except if C. Product Comparisons
Although non-emergency issues not
that rate is de minimis within the D. Constructed Export Price contained in this agenda may be
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in E. SeAH’s Alleged Affiliation With POSCO discussed, those issues may not be the
which case the cash deposit rate will be Based on Close Supplier Relationship subject of formal action during this
zero; (2) for merchandise exported by F. Normal Value meeting. Action will be restricted to
manufacturers or exporters not covered G. Cost of Production Analysis those issues specifically identified in
in this review but covered in a prior H. Calculation of Normal Value Based on this notice and any issues arising after
segment of the proceeding, the cash Comparison Market Prices publication of this notice that require
deposit rate will continue to be the I. Currency Conversion emergency action under section 305(c)
company-specific rate published for the J. Application of Facts Available and Use of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
of Adverse Inferences
most recently completed segment of this Recommendation
Conservation and Management Act,
proceeding in which the manufacturer provided the public has been notified of
or exporter participated; (3) if the [FR Doc. 2016–00078 Filed 1–6–16; 8:45 am] the Council’s intent to take final action
exporter is not a firm covered in this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P to address the emergency.
review, a prior review, or the less-than-
Special Accommodations
fair-value investigation but the
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE This meeting is physically accessible
rate will be the rate established for the to people with disabilities. Requests for
National Oceanic and Atmospheric sign language interpretation or other
most recently completed segment of this
Administration auxiliary aids should be directed to
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the New England Fishery Management Thomas A. Nies (see ADDRESSES) at least
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm Council; Public Meeting 5 days prior to the meeting date.
covered in this or any previously Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
completed segment of this proceeding, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Dated: January 4, 2016.
then the cash deposit rate will be the Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Tracey L. Thompson,
‘‘all-others’’ rate of 6.83 percent
established in the less-than-fair-value Commerce. Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
investigation.13 These deposit ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
[FR Doc. 2016–00026 Filed 1–6–16; 8:45 am]
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice. SUMMARY: The New England Fishery BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Management Council’s (Council) Risk
Notification to Importers Policy Working Group will meet to
This notice serves as a preliminary consider actions affecting New England DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
reminder to importers of their fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ). National Oceanic and Atmospheric
responsibility under 19 CFR
Administration
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate DATES: The meeting will be held on
regarding the reimbursement of Monday, January 11, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. RIN 0648–XE267
antidumping duties prior to liquidation ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The
of the relevant entries during this meeting will be held at the DoubleTree Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
review period. Failure to comply with by Hilton, 50 Ferncroft Road, Danvers, Specified Activities; Taking Marine
this requirement could result in the MA 01923; telephone: (978) 777–2500; Mammals Incidental to Operation,
Department’s presumption that fax: (978) 750–7991. Maintenance, and Repair of the
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reimbursement of antidumping duties Council address: New England Northeast Gateway Liquefied Natural
occurred and the subsequent assessment Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Gas Port and the Algonquin Pipeline
of doubled antidumping duties. Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. Lateral Facilities in Massachusetts Bay
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
13 See Antidumping Duty Order and Clarification
of Final Determination: Certain Welded Stainless
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Steel Pipes From Korea, 57 FR 62301, 62302 New England Fishery Management Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
(December 30, 1992). Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492. Commerce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_746/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-01-07 00:13:25
Document Modified: 2016-01-07 00:13:25
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2316. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 742 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR