81 FR 7871 - Program for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d-2; Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Proposed Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Between the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and the National Stock Exchange, Inc.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 30 (February 16, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 30 (February 16, 2016)
| Page Range | 7871-7873 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02982 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 7871-7873] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02982] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-77089; File No. 4-694] Program for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d-2; Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Proposed Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Between the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and the National Stock Exchange, Inc. February 9, 2016. On December 23, 2015, the National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX'') and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') (together with NSX, the ``Parties'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') a plan for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities, dated December 22, 2015 (``17d-2 Plan'' or the ``Plan''). The Plan was published for comment on January 14, 2016.\1\ The Commission received no comments on the Plan. This order approves and declares effective the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76856 (January 8, 2016), 81 FR 1971. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Introduction Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\2\ among other things, requires every self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') registered as either a national securities exchange or national securities association to examine for, and enforce compliance by, its members and persons associated with its members with the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the SRO's own rules, unless the SRO is relieved of this responsibility pursuant to Section 17(d) or Section 19(g)(2) of the Act.\3\ Without this relief, the statutory obligation of each individual SRO could result in a pattern of multiple examinations of broker-dealers that maintain memberships in more than one SRO (``common members''). Such regulatory duplication would add unnecessary expenses for common members and their SROs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1). \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2), respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 17(d)(1) of the Act \4\ was intended, in part, to eliminate unnecessary multiple examinations and regulatory duplication.\5\ With respect to a common member, Section 17(d)(1) authorizes the Commission, by rule or order, to relieve an SRO of the responsibility to receive regulatory reports, to examine for and enforce compliance with applicable statutes, rules, and regulations, or to perform other specified regulatory functions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d)(1). \5\ See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 94-75, 94th Cong., 1st Session 32 (1975). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To implement Section 17(d)(1), the Commission adopted two rules: Rule 17d-1 and Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\6\ Rule 17d-1 authorizes the Commission to name a single SRO as the designated examining authority (``DEA'') to examine common members for compliance with the financial responsibility requirements imposed by the Act, or by Commission or SRO rules.\7\ When an SRO has been named as a common member's DEA, all other SROs to which the common member belongs are relieved of the responsibility to examine the firm for compliance with the applicable financial responsibility rules. On its face, Rule 17d-1 deals only with an SRO's obligations to enforce member compliance with financial responsibility requirements. Rule 17d-1 does not relieve an SRO from its [[Page 7872]] obligation to examine a common member for compliance with its own rules and provisions of the federal securities laws governing matters other than financial responsibility, including sales practices and trading activities and practices. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 17 CFR 240.17d-1 and 17 CFR 240.17d-2, respectively. \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12352 (April 20, 1976), 41 FR 18808 (May 7, 1976). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To address regulatory duplication in these and other areas, the Commission adopted Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\8\ Rule 17d-2 permits SROs to propose joint plans for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities with respect to their common members. Under paragraph (c) of Rule 17d-2, the Commission may declare such a plan effective if, after providing for appropriate notice and comment, it determines that the plan is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors; to foster cooperation and coordination among the SROs; to remove impediments to, and foster the development of, a national market system and a national clearance and settlement system; and is in conformity with the factors set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act. Commission approval of a plan filed pursuant to Rule 17d-2 relieves an SRO of those regulatory responsibilities allocated by the plan to another SRO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12935 (October 28, 1976), 41 FR 49091 (November 8, 1976). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Proposed Plan The proposed 17d-2 Plan is intended to reduce regulatory duplication for firms that are common members of both NSX and FINRA.\9\ Pursuant to the proposed 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume certain examination and enforcement responsibilities for common members with respect to certain applicable laws, rules, and regulations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ The proposed 17d-2 Plan refers to these common members as ``Dual Members.'' See Paragraph 1(c) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. On December 14, 2015, the Commission approved a proposal from NSX to resume its status as a fully operational securities exchange and to re-commence trading operations. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76640 (December 14, 2015), 80 FR 79122 (December 18, 2015) (SR- NSX-2015-05) (approval order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The text of the Plan delineates the proposed regulatory responsibilities with respect to the Parties. Included in the proposed Plan is an exhibit (the ``National Stock Exchange (``NSX'') Rules Certification for 17d-2 Agreement with FINRA,'' referred to herein as the ``Certification'') that lists every NSX rule, and select federal securities laws, rules, and regulations, for which FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for overseeing and enforcing with respect to NSX members that are also members of FINRA and the associated persons therewith (``Dual Members''). Specifically, under the 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume examination and enforcement responsibility relating to compliance by Dual Members with the rules of NSX that are substantially similar to the applicable rules of FINRA,\10\ as well as any provisions of the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder delineated in the Certification (``Common Rules''). In the event that a Dual Member is the subject of an investigation relating to a transaction on NSX, the plan acknowledges that NSX may, in its discretion, exercise concurrent jurisdiction and responsibility for such matter.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See paragraph 1(b) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan (defining Common Rules). See also paragraph 1(f) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan (defining Regulatory Responsibilities). Paragraph 2 of the Plan provides that annually, or more frequently as required by changes in either NSX rules or FINRA rules, the parties shall review and update, if necessary, the list of Common Rules. Further, paragraph 3 of the Plan provides that NSX shall furnish FINRA with a list of Dual Members, and shall update the list no less frequently than once each calendar quarter. \11\ See paragraph 6 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the Plan, NSX would retain full responsibility for surveillance and enforcement with respect to trading activities or practices involving NSX's own marketplace, including, without limitation, registration pursuant to its applicable rules of associated persons (i.e., registration rules that are not Common Rules); its duties as a DEA pursuant to Rule 17d-1 under the Act; and any NSX rules that are not Common Rules.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See paragraph 2 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion The Commission finds that the proposed Plan is consistent with the factors set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act \13\ and Rule 17d-2(c) thereunder \14\ in that the proposed Plan is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the protection of investors, fosters cooperation and coordination among SROs, and removes impediments to and fosters the development of the national market system. In particular, the Commission believes that the proposed Plan should reduce unnecessary regulatory duplication by allocating to FINRA certain examination and enforcement responsibilities for common members that would otherwise be performed by NSX and FINRA. Accordingly, the proposed Plan promotes efficiency by reducing costs to common members. Furthermore, because NSX and FINRA will coordinate their regulatory functions in accordance with the Plan, the Plan should promote investor protection. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d). \14\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission notes that, under the Plan, NSX and FINRA have allocated regulatory responsibility for those NSX rules, set forth in the Certification, that are substantially similar to the applicable FINRA rules in that examination for compliance with such provisions and rules would not require FINRA to develop one or more new examination standards, modules, procedures, or criteria in order to analyze the application of the rule, or a common member's activity, conduct, or output in relation to such rule. In addition, under the Plan, FINRA would assume regulatory responsibility for certain provisions of the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder that are set forth in the Certification. The Common Rules covered by the Plan are specifically listed in the Certification, as may be amended by the Parties from time to time. According to the Plan, NSX will review the Certification, at least annually, or more frequently if required by changes in either the rules of NSX or FINRA, and, if necessary, submit to FINRA an updated list of Common Rules to add NSX rules not included on the then-current list of Common Rules that are substantially similar to FINRA rules; delete NSX rules included in the then-current list of Common Rules that are no longer substantially similar to FINRA rules; and confirm that the remaining rules on the list of Common Rules continue to be NSX rules that are substantially similar to FINRA rules.\15\ FINRA will then confirm in writing whether the rules listed in any updated list are Common Rules as defined in the Plan. Under the Plan, NSX will also provide FINRA with a current list of common members and shall update the list no less frequently than once each quarter.\16\ The Commission believes that these provisions are designed to provide for continuing communication between the Parties to ensure the continued accuracy of the scope of the proposed allocation of regulatory responsibility. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See paragraph 2 of the Plan. \16\ See paragraph 3 of the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission is hereby declaring effective a Plan that, among other things, allocates regulatory responsibility to FINRA for the oversight and enforcement of all NSX rules that are substantially similar to the rules of FINRA for common members of NSX and FINRA. Therefore, modifications to the Certification need not be filed with the Commission as an [[Page 7873]] amendment to the Plan, provided that the Parties are only adding to, deleting from, or confirming changes to NSX rules in the Certification in conformance with the definition of Common Rules provided in the Plan. However, should the Parties decide to add a NSX rule to the Certification that is not substantially similar to a FINRA rule; delete a NSX rule from the Certification that is substantially similar to a FINRA rule; or leave on the Certification a NSX rule that is no longer substantially similar to a FINRA rule, then such a change would constitute an amendment to the Plan, which must be filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ The Commission also notes that the addition to or deletion from the Certification of any federal securities laws, rules, and regulations for which FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for examining, and enforcing compliance by, common members, also would constitute an amendment to the Plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Conclusion This Order gives effect to the Plan filed with the Commission in File No. 4-694. The Parties shall notify all members affected by the Plan of their rights and obligations under the Plan. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 17(d) of the Act, that the Plan in File No. 4-694, between FINRA and NSX, filed pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act, is approved and declared effective. It is further ordered that NSX is relieved of those responsibilities allocated to FINRA under the Plan in File No. 4-694. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\18\ Brent J. Fields, Secretary. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(34). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-02982 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7871
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s communications relating to the I. Introduction
Statement on Comments on the proposed rule change between the Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities
Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission and any person, other than Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),2 among
Members, Participants, or Others those that may be withheld from the other things, requires every self-
The Exchange neither solicited nor public in accordance with the regulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’)
received comments on the proposed provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be registered as either a national securities
rule change. available for Web site viewing and exchange or national securities
printing in the Commission’s Public association to examine for, and enforce
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., compliance by, its members and persons
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Washington, DC 20549, on official associated with its members with the
Commission Action
business days between the hours of Act, the rules and regulations
The foregoing rule change has become 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the thereunder, and the SRO’s own rules,
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) filing also will be available for unless the SRO is relieved of this
of the Act 10 and paragraph (f) of Rule inspection and copying at the principal responsibility pursuant to Section 17(d)
19b–4 11 thereunder. At any time within office of the Exchange. All comments or Section 19(g)(2) of the Act.3 Without
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule received will be posted without change; this relief, the statutory obligation of
change, the Commission summarily may each individual SRO could result in a
the Commission does not edit personal
temporarily suspend such rule change if pattern of multiple examinations of
identifying information from
it appears to the Commission that such broker-dealers that maintain
action is necessary or appropriate in the submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make memberships in more than one SRO
public interest, for the protection of (‘‘common members’’). Such regulatory
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of available publicly. All submissions
duplication would add unnecessary
the purposes of the Act. If the should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
expenses for common members and
Commission takes such action, the 2016–008 and should be submitted on
their SROs.
Commission will institute proceedings or before March 8, 2016. Section 17(d)(1) of the Act 4 was
to determine whether the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of intended, in part, to eliminate
change should be approved or Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated unnecessary multiple examinations and
disapproved. authority.12 regulatory duplication.5 With respect to
IV. Solicitation of Comments Brent J. Fields, a common member, Section 17(d)(1)
Secretary. authorizes the Commission, by rule or
Interested persons are invited to order, to relieve an SRO of the
submit written data, views and [FR Doc. 2016–02986 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
responsibility to receive regulatory
arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
reports, to examine for and enforce
including whether the proposed rule compliance with applicable statutes,
change is consistent with the Act. rules, and regulations, or to perform
Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE other specified regulatory functions.
the following methods: COMMISSION To implement Section 17(d)(1), the
Electronic Comments Commission adopted two rules: Rule
[Release No. 34–77089; File No. 4–694] 17d–1 and Rule 17d–2 under the Act.6
• Use the Commission’s Internet Rule 17d–1 authorizes the Commission
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Program for Allocation of Regulatory to name a single SRO as the designated
rules/sro.shtml); or Responsibilities Pursuant to Rule 17d– examining authority (‘‘DEA’’) to
• Send an email to rule-comments@ 2; Order Approving and Declaring examine common members for
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Effective a Proposed Plan for the compliance with the financial
CBOE–2016–008 on the subject line. Allocation of Regulatory responsibility requirements imposed by
Paper Comments Responsibilities Between the Financial the Act, or by Commission or SRO
• Send paper comments in triplicate Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and rules.7 When an SRO has been named as
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange the National Stock Exchange, Inc. a common member’s DEA, all other
Commission, 100 F Street NE., SROs to which the common member
February 9, 2016. belongs are relieved of the responsibility
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File On December 23, 2015, the National to examine the firm for compliance with
Number SR–CBOE–2016–008. This file Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NSX’’) and the the applicable financial responsibility
number should be included on the Financial Industry Regulatory rules. On its face, Rule 17d–1 deals only
subject line if email is used. To help the Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) (together with an SRO’s obligations to enforce
Commission process and review your with NSX, the ‘‘Parties’’) filed with the member compliance with financial
comments more efficiently, please use Securities and Exchange Commission responsibility requirements. Rule 17d–1
only one method. The Commission will (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’) a plan for the does not relieve an SRO from its
post all comments on the Commission’s allocation of regulatory responsibilities,
2 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1).
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ dated December 22, 2015 (‘‘17d–2 Plan’’ 3 15 U.S.C. 78q(d) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2),
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the or the ‘‘Plan’’). The Plan was published respectively.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
submission, all subsequent for comment on January 14, 2016.1 The 4 15 U.S.C. 78q(d)(1).
amendments, all written statements Commission received no comments on 5 See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Report
with respect to the proposed rule the Plan. This order approves and of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 249, S. Rep. No. 94–
change that are filed with the declares effective the Plan. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Session 32 (1975).
Commission, and all written 6 17 CFR 240.17d–1 and 17 CFR 240.17d–2,
12 17CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). respectively.
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 1 SeeSecurities Exchange Act Release No. 76856 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12352
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). (January 8, 2016), 81 FR 1971. (April 20, 1976), 41 FR 18808 (May 7, 1976).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:15 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7901/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7873
amendment to the Plan, provided that SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the Parties are only adding to, deleting COMMISSION Statement of the Purpose of, and
from, or confirming changes to NSX Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
rules in the Certification in conformance [Release No. 34–77092; File No. SR–BOX– Change
with the definition of Common Rules 2016–03] In its filing with the Commission, the
provided in the Plan. However, should self-regulatory organization included
the Parties decide to add a NSX rule to Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX statements concerning the purpose of,
the Certification that is not substantially Options Exchange LLC; Notice of and basis for, the proposed rule change
similar to a FINRA rule; delete a NSX Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of and discussed any comments it received
rule from the Certification that is a Proposed Rule Change To Add Rule on the proposed rule change. The text
substantially similar to a FINRA rule; or 7310 (Drill-Through Protection) To of these statements may be examined at
leave on the Certification a NSX rule Implement a New Price Protection the places specified in Item IV below.
that is no longer substantially similar to Feature The self-regulatory organization has
a FINRA rule, then such a change would prepared summaries, set forth in
February 9, 2016. Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
constitute an amendment to the Plan,
which must be filed with the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the significant aspects of such statements.
Commission pursuant to Rule 17d–2 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
under the Act.17 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Statement of the Purpose of, and
notice is hereby given that on January Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
IV. Conclusion
27, 2016, BOX Options Exchange LLC Change
This Order gives effect to the Plan (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission 1. Purpose
filed with the Commission in File No.
4–694. The Parties shall notify all (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule The Exchange is proposing to adopt a
members affected by the Plan of their change as described in Items I and II mechanism that will prevent BOX from
rights and obligations under the Plan. below, which Items have been prepared experiencing dramatic price swings.
by the self-regulatory organization. The Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to add Rule 7310 (Drill-through Protection)
Commission is publishing this notice to
Section 17(d) of the Act, that the Plan to implement a new price protection
solicit comments on the proposed rule
in File No. 4–694, between FINRA and feature on BOX. The new price
from interested persons.
NSX, filed pursuant to Rule 17d–2 protection feature is designed to prevent
under the Act, is approved and declared I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s orders and quotes from drilling through
effective. Statement of the Terms of Substance of and executing at multiple price points.
It is further ordered that NSX is the Proposed Rule Change This circumstance can exist if, for
relieved of those responsibilities example, a Market Order,3 or
The Exchange proposes to add Rule aggressively priced Limit Order 4 or
allocated to FINRA under the Plan in
7310 (Drill-through Protection) to quote is entered that is larger than the
File No. 4–694.
implement a new price protection total volume of contracts quoted at the
For the Commission, by the Division of feature. The text of the proposed rule top-of-book across all U.S. options
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated change is available from the principal exchanges.5 Currently, without any
authority.18 office of the Exchange, at the protections in place, this could result in
Brent J. Fields, Commission’s Public Reference Room options executing at prices that have
Secretary. and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web little or no relation to the theoretical
[FR Doc. 2016–02982 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] site at http://boxexchange.com. price of the option.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P For example, in a thinly traded
option:
AWAY EXCHANGES
Exchange Bid size Bid price Offer price Offer size
Away Exchange #1 .......................................................................................... 5 $2.00 $2.05 5
Away Exchange #2 .......................................................................................... 5 2.00 2.10 5
Away Exchange #3 .......................................................................................... 5 2.00 2.10 5
Away Exchange #4 .......................................................................................... 5 2.00 2.15 5
17 The Commission also notes that the addition to 3 Market Orders submitted to BOX are executed volume left after part of a Limit Order has traded
or deletion from the Certification of any federal at the best price obtainable for the total quantity is retained in the BOX Book until it is withdrawn
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
securities laws, rules, and regulations for which available when the order reaches the BOX market. or traded (unless a designation described in
FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan for Any remaining quantity is executed at the next best Rule7110(d) is added which prevents the untraded
price available for the total quantity available. This
examining, and enforcing compliance by, common part of a limit order from being retained). All Limit
process continues until the Market Order is fully
members, also would constitute an amendment to executed. Prior to execution at each price level, Orders (with the exception of those with a Good ’Til
the Plan. Market Orders are filtered pursuant to the Cancelled (‘‘GTC’’) designation as described in Rule
18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(34). procedures set forth in Rule 7130(b) to avoid 7110(d)(1)) are automatically withdrawn by the
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). trading through the NBBO. See Rule 7110(c)(3). Trading Host at market close.
4 Limit Orders entered into the BOX Book are 5 There are currently 12 options exchanges.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
executed at the price stated or better. Any residual
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:15 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7901/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-13 03:13:44
Document Modified: 2016-02-13 03:13:44
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 7871 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR