81 FR 85203 - Air Plan Approval: AK; Permitting Fees Revision
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 227 (November 25, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 227 (November 25, 2016)
| Page Range | 85203-85203 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28276 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 227 (Friday, November 25, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 85203] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28276] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0591; FRL-9955-47-Region 10] Air Plan Approval: AK; Permitting Fees Revision AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Alaska (state) Department of Environmental Conservation on February 1, 2016. The revisions implement changes to permit administration and compliance fees based on the state's fee study results. Changes include: The addition of definitions, restructuring of fee categories, rearranging and renumbering of certain fee rules, and updating cross references to align with the restructured fee rules. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 27, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10- OAR-2016-0591 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Ruddick at (206) 553-1999, or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. For further information, please see the direct final action, of the same title, which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. The EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final rule. If the EPA receives no adverse comments, the EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. Dated: November 14, 2016. Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2016-28276 Filed 11-23-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 227 / Friday, November 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 85203
will consider all comments and material shall open the south half of the double you consider to be Confidential
received during the comment period. bascule span on signal for the passage Business Information (CBI) or other
Your comment can help shape the of vessels, if at least one half-hour information whose disclosure is
outcome of this rulemaking. If you notice is given to the drawtender, at the restricted by statute. Multimedia
submit a comment, please include the Lewis and Clark River Bridge by marine submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
docket number for this rulemaking, radio, telephone, or other suitable accompanied by a written comment.
indicate the specific section of this means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday The written comment is considered the
document to which each comment through Friday and from 8 a.m. to 4 official comment and should include
applies, and provide a reason for each p.m. Saturday and Sunday from March discussion of all points you wish to
suggestion or recommendation. 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017. At all other make. The EPA will generally not
We encourage you to submit times, including all Federal holidays, consider comments or comment
comments through the Federal but Columbus Day, at least a two-hour contents located outside of the primary
eRulemaking Portal at http:// notice by telephone is required. The submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
www.regulations.gov. If your material opening signal is two prolonged blasts other file sharing system). For
cannot be submitted using http:// followed by one short blast. additional submission methods, the full
www.regulations.gov, contact the person Dated: November 16, 2016. EPA public comment policy,
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Brendan McPherson,
information about CBI or multimedia
CONTACT section of this document for submissions, and general guidance on
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
alternate instructions. Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
making effective comments, please visit
We accept anonymous comments. All http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
[FR Doc. 2016–28359 Filed 11–23–16; 8:45 am]
comments received will be posted commenting-epa-dockets.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
without change to http://
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
www.regulations.gov and will include
Randall Ruddick at (206) 553–1999, or
any personal information you have
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ruddick.randall@epa.gov.
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy AGENCY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Throughout this document whenever
Management System in the March 24, 40 CFR Part 52 ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 [EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0591; FRL–9955–47– intended to refer to the EPA. For further
FR 15086). Region 10] information, please see the direct final
Documents mentioned in this notice action, of the same title, which is
and all public comments, are in our Air Plan Approval: AK; Permitting Fees located in the Rules section of this
online docket at http:// Revision Federal Register. The EPA is approving
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed AGENCY: Environmental Protection the State’s SIP revision as a direct final
by following that Web site’s Agency (EPA). rule without prior proposal because the
instructions. Additionally, if you go to EPA views this as a noncontroversial
ACTION: Proposed rule.
the online docket and sign up for email SIP revision and anticipates no adverse
alerts, you will be notified when SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection comments. A detailed rationale for the
comments are posted or a final rule is Agency (EPA) proposes to approve state approval is set forth in the preamble to
published. implementation plan (SIP) revisions the direct final rule. If the EPA receives
submitted by the State of Alaska (state) no adverse comments, the EPA will not
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 take further action on this proposed
Department of Environmental
Bridges. Conservation on February 1, 2016. The rule.
For the reasons discussed in the revisions implement changes to permit If the EPA receives adverse
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to administration and compliance fees comments, the EPA will withdraw the
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: based on the state’s fee study results. direct final rule and it will not take
Changes include: The addition of effect. The EPA will address all public
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE definitions, restructuring of fee comments in a subsequent final rule
OPERATION REGULATIONS categories, rearranging and renumbering based on this proposed rule. The EPA
of certain fee rules, and updating cross will not institute a second comment
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
references to align with the restructured period on this action. Any parties
continues to read as follows:
fee rules. interested in commenting on this action
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; should do so at this time. Please note
DATES: Written comments must be
Department of Homeland Security Delegation that if we receive adverse comment on
No. 0170.1. received on or before December 27,
2016. an amendment, paragraph, or section of
■ 2. In § 117.899, from 7 a.m. on March this rule and if that provision may be
1, 2017 through 5 p.m. on October 31, ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, severed from the remainder of the rule,
2017, suspend paragraph (b) and add identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10– the EPA may adopt as final those
paragraph (d) to read as follows: OAR–2016–0591 at http:// provisions of the rule that are not the
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online subject of an adverse comment.
§ 117.899 Drawbridge Operation instructions for submitting comments.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulation; Youngs Bay, Astoria, OR Once submitted, comments cannot be Dated: November 14, 2016.
* * * * * edited or removed from Regulations.gov. Dennis J. McLerran,
(d) The draw of the Oregon State (Old The EPA may publish any comment Regional Administrator, Region 10.
Youngs Bay) Highway Bridge, mile 2.4, received to its public docket. Do not [FR Doc. 2016–28276 Filed 11–23–16; 8:45 am]
across Youngs Bay foot of Fifth Street, submit electronically any information BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:01 Nov 23, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\25NOP1.SGM 25NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_85430/page/1.svg)
Document Created: 2016-11-23 23:17:57
Document Modified: 2016-11-23 23:17:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before December 27, 2016. | |
| Contact | Randall Ruddick at (206) 553-1999, or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 85203 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR