81 FR 8650 - Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Particulate Matter Emissions Limits Revision
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 34 (February 22, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 34 (February 22, 2016)
| Page Range | 8650-8654 | |
| FR Document | 2016-03490 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 8650-8654] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-03490] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0379; FRL-9942-54-Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Particulate Matter Emissions Limits Revision AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a June 1, 2015, request by Indiana to revise the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate changes to the particulate matter (PM) rules contained in Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC). This approval affects sources of PM in the state of Indiana. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective April 22, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 23, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2015-0379 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Environmental Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. What is the background for this action? II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision? III. What action is EPA taking? IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background for this action? On June 1, 2015, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a request for EPA to approve revisions to PM rules contained in 326 IAC 6.5 and 6.8. The revisions to these rules were published in the May 28, 2015, edition of the Indiana Register. On January 14, 2015, IDEM held the first of two public hearings on revisions to these rules. IDEM received comments during its January 14, 2015, public hearing, and IDEM revised its rules in response to those comments. IDEM's second public hearing was held on March 11, 2015. IDEM did not receive any comments at its March 11, 2015, public hearing. II. What is EPA's analysis of the SIP revision? Below is a discussion of changes to 326 IAC 6.5:Sections 4-2, 4-17 and 4-24 Revisions to 326 IAC 6.5-4-2 and 326 IAC 6.5-4-17 consolidate the identification numbers of the Kimball Office facilities in Jasper Indiana from 00046 and 00042 to 00100. The revision to 326 IAC 6.5-4-24 revises the business name of the regulated source from Styline Industries, Inc. Plant #8 to OFS Brands, Inc.--Plant #3. These administrative revisions provide clarity to the existing rule and are approvable into the Indiana SIP. [[Page 8651]] Section 5-2 Revisions to 326 IAC 6.5-5-2 update the business name of the regulated source from Chrysler Group to FCA US, and the source identification number for boiler 4 at the FCA US, LLC Kokomo Transmission Plant from 00065 to 00078. Additionally, the revision removes the following units, due to shut down and removal, at the FCA US, LLC Kokomo Casting Plant: Reverberatory furnaces 1ARF, 1BRF, and 5RF (source identification numbers 2P, 3P, and 7P, respectively). Overall, the revisions to Section 5-2 are approvable into the Indiana SIP as they provide clarity to the existing rule, and the removal of these units will reduce emissions. Section 5-5 A revision to 326 IAC 6.5-5-5 updates the business name of the regulated source from Delco Electronics Corporation to GM Components Holdings, LLC. Section 6-2 A revision to 326 IAC 6.5-6-2 removes boilers 1, 2, and 3 from Allison Transmission due to shut down and removal. Further, a revision to this section updates the source identification number for this facility from 00017 to 00310, and consolidates reporting requirements for this source. Overall, these revisions to Section 6-2 are approvable into the Indiana SIP as they provide clarity to the existing rule, and the removal of these units will help reduce emissions. Section 6-25 and 6-26 A revision to Section 6.5-6-25 updates the business name of the regulated source from National Starch and Chemical Company to Ingredion Incorporated Indianapolis Plant. A revision to Section 6.6-6-26 updates the business name of the regulated source from International Truck and Engine Corporation & Indianapolis Casting Corporation to Navistar, Inc. Section 6-33 A revision to 326 IAC 6.5-6-33 removes Boilers 0070 01 through 0070 04 from the Rolls-Royce Corporation facility due to their shutdown and removal. In addition, a revision to Paragraph (3)(B) (post-revision, paragraph (2)(B)) removes coal and adds #4 fuel oil to a list of operating fuels for the facility. These revisions to Section 6-33 are approvable into the Indiana SIP as the removal of these units will help to reduce emissions. 326 IAC 6.8 Below is a discussion of changes to 326 IAC 6.8: Section 2-18 A revision to 326 IAC 6.8-2-18 removes three units and increases the PM emission rates (in lbs/hour) for two units at the Jupiter Aluminum Corporation's facility in Lake County. The aluminum reverberatory furnaces 3, 4, and 5 were shut down and removed, and the PM emission rates for the aluminum reverberatory furnaces 2 and 6 were increased. Specifically, the PM emission rate for the aluminum reverberatory furnace 2 was increased from 1.137 to 1.499 lbs/hour. The PM emission rate for the aluminum reverberatory furnace 6 was increased from 0.970 to 2.008 lbs/hour. The increase in PM emission rates are offset by the reduction in PM emission rates due to the shut down and removal of the aluminum reverberatory furnaces 3, 4, and 5. The revision to this section is approvable into the Indiana SIP. Section 2-29 Revisions to 326 IAC 6.8-2-29 update the business name of the regulated source from Reed Minerals to Harsco Minerals. The revision also removes the fluidized bed dryer and its associated PM emission due to shut down and removal. These revisions to Section 2-29 are approvable into the Indiana SIP as they provide clarity to the existing rule, and the shutdown of the fluidized bed dryer will help reduce emissions. Section 2-34 Revisions to 326 IAC 6.8-2-34 remove one molded pulp dryer; revise the PM emissions limits for the remaining molded pulp dryers; and clarify the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for the Huhtamaki Foodservice, Inc., in Lake County. Specifically, the PM emission rates for the molded pulp dryers were revised as follows: --Molded pulp dryer number 1: 0.290 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 2: 0.290 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 3: 0.342 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 4: 0.342 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 5: 0.290 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 6: 0.290 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 8: 0.615 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 9: 0.615 lbs/hour --Molded pulp dryer number 10: 0.615 lbs/hour The total facility PM emissions rate for molded pulp dryers remains capped at 2.41 lbs/hour. Additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements were included to ensure compliance with the capped PM emissions rate under any operating scenario. Because this rule revision retains the capped PM emission rate, and because this rule revision includes requirements to ensure the facility complies with the PM emission rates, these revisions are approvable into the Indiana SIP. The revisions to 326 IAC 6-5 and 6-8 contain wording changes and additions, improve and expand the applicability of the rule and its impact on air quality statewide. On balance, EPA finds that the revisions strengthen the existing SIP in Indiana and as such, deems the submittal approvable. III. What action is EPA taking? EPA is approving into the Indiana SIP revisions to the PM rules contained in Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Article 6, Rule 5 (326 IAC 6.5) and Rule 8 (326 IAC 6.8). We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse written comments are filed. This rule will be effective April 22, 2016 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by March 23, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective April 22, 2016. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In [[Page 8652]] accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Indiana Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 22, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 3, 2016. Robert A. Kaplan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 0 2. In Sec. 52.770, the table in paragraph (c) is amended under the headings entitled ``Article 6.5. Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County'' and ``Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County'' by: 0 i. Removing the entries for Rules 6.5-3-7 and 6.5-3-8 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 3. Dearborn County''. 0 ii. Revising the entries for Rules 6.5-4-2, 6.5-4-4, 6.5-4-17, and 6.5- 4-24 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 4. Dubois County''. 0 iii. Revising the entries for Rules 6.5-5-2 and 6.5-5-5 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 5. Howard County''. 0 iv. Revising the entries for Rules 6.5-6-2, 6.5-6-25, 6.5-6-26, and 6.5-6-33, and removing the entries for Rules 6.5-6-3 and 6.5-6-15 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 6. Marion County''. 0 v. Removing the entry for Rule 6.5-9-8 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 9. Vigo County''. 0 vi. Removing the entry for Rule 6.5-10-6 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 10. Wayne County''. 0 vii. Revising the entries for Rules 6.8-2-18, 6.8-2-29 and 6.8-2-34 under the subheading entitled ``Rule 2. Lake County: PM 10 Emission Requirements''. The revised text reads as follows: Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * [[Page 8653]] EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Indiana Indiana citation Subject effective date EPA Approval date Notes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article 6.5. Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 4. Dubois County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 6.5-4-2........................... Kimball Office-- 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Jasper 15th Street. citation]. * * * * * * * 6.5-4-4........................... DMI Furniture Plant 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... No. 5. citation]. * * * * * * * 6.5-4-17.......................... Kimball Office-- 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Jasper Cherry Street. citation]. * * * * * * * 6.5-4-24.......................... Styline Industries, 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Inc. Plant #8. citation]. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 5. Howard County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 6.5-5-2........................... Chrysler, LLC-Kokomo 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Casting Plant and citation]. Kokomo Transmission Plant. 6.5-5-5........................... Delco Electronics 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Corporation. citation]. * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 6. Marion County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 6.5-6-2........................... Allison Transmission. 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... citation]. * * * * * * * 6.5-6-25.......................... National Starch and 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Chemical Company. citation]. 6.5-6-26.......................... International Truck 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... and Engine citation]. Corporation & Indianapolis Casting Corporation. * * * * * * * 6.5-6-33.......................... Rolls-Royce 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Corporation. citation]. * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rule 2. Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 6.8-2-18.......................... Jupiter Aluminum 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Corporation. citation]. [[Page 8654]] * * * * * * * 6.8-2-29.......................... Reed Minerals-Plant 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... #14. citation]. * * * * * * * 6.8-2-34.......................... Huhtamaki 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal Register .................................... Foodservice, Inc.. citation]. * * * * * * * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-03490 Filed 2-19-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![8650 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
filing fee unless the petitioner includes Dated: December 30, 2015. system). For additional submission
a statement with its petition to Suzanne M. Barnett, methods, please contact the person
participate stating that the petitioner Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. identified in the FOR FURTHER
will not seek a distribution of more than Approved by: INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
$1000, in which case no filing fee is David S. Mao,
full EPA public comment policy,
required. Prior to the Technical information about CBI or multimedia
Acting Librarian of Congress.
Corrections Act, the threshold for a fee submissions, and general guidance on
[FR Doc. 2016–03599 Filed 2–19–16; 8:45 am]
waiver in a distribution proceeding was making effective comments, please visit
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
$10,000, an amount that was (and still http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
is) codified in CRB Rule 351.1(b)(4).1 commenting-epa-dockets.
To conform the CRB regulation with FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
the statutory provision under which it AGENCY Anthony Maietta, Environmental
was adopted, the Judges hereby amend Protection Specialist, Control Strategies
CRB Rule 351.1(b)(4) to state that the 40 CFR Part 52 Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
threshold requirement for a filing fee [EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0379; FRL–9942–54– Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
waiver is $1000, rather than $10,000. Region 5]
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777,
Because this is a technical amendment, maietta.anthony@epa.gov.
the Judges find that prior publication for Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Particulate
notice and comment is unnecessary. See Matter Emissions Limits Revision SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). See also 61 FR Throughout this document whenever
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
63715 (Dec. 2, 1996) (adopting technical ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
Agency (EPA).
amendments to CARP rules). EPA. This supplementary information
ACTION: Direct final rule.
section is arranged as follows:
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 351 SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act I. What is the background for this action?
(CAA), the Environmental Protection II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP revision?
Administrative practice and III. What action is EPA taking?
Agency (EPA) is approving a June 1,
procedure, Copyright. IV. Incorporation by Reference
2015, request by Indiana to revise the
For the reasons set forth in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
preamble, the Copyright Royalty Judges incorporate changes to the particulate
matter (PM) rules contained in Title 326 I. What is the background for this
amend 37 CFR part 351 as follows:
of the Indiana Administrative Code action?
PART 351—PROCEEDINGS (IAC). This approval affects sources of On June 1, 2015, the Indiana
PM in the state of Indiana. Department of Environmental
■ 1. The authority citation for part 351 DATES: This direct final rule will be Management (IDEM) submitted a
continues to read as follows: effective April 22, 2016, unless EPA request for EPA to approve revisions to
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 803.
receives adverse comments by March PM rules contained in 326 IAC 6.5 and
23, 2016. If adverse comments are 6.8. The revisions to these rules were
■ 2. Amend § 351.1 to revise paragraph received, EPA will publish a timely published in the May 28, 2015, edition
(b)(4) to read as follows: withdrawal of the direct final rule in the of the Indiana Register. On January 14,
Federal Register informing the public 2015, IDEM held the first of two public
§ 351.1 Initiation of proceedings. that the rule will not take effect. hearings on revisions to these rules.
* * * * * ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, IDEM received comments during its
(b) * * * identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– January 14, 2015, public hearing, and
OAR–2015–0379 at http:// IDEM revised its rules in response to
(4) Filing fee. A petition to participate www.regulations.gov or via email to those comments. IDEM’s second public
must be accompanied with a filing fee blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments hearing was held on March 11, 2015.
of $150 or the petition will be rejected. submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the IDEM did not receive any comments at
Payment shall be made to the Copyright online instructions for submitting its March 11, 2015, public hearing.
Royalty Board. If a check is comments. Once submitted, comments II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP
subsequently dishonored, the petition cannot be edited or removed from revision?
will be rejected. If the petitioner Regulations.gov. For either manner of
believes that the contested amount of submission, EPA may publish any Below is a discussion of changes to
that petitioner’s claim will be $1000 or comment received to its public docket. 326 IAC 6.5:
less, petitioner shall so state in the Do not submit electronically any • Sections 4–2, 4–17 and 4–24
petition to participate and should not information you consider to be
include payment of the $150 filing fee. Confidential Business Information (CBI) Revisions to 326 IAC 6.5–4–2 and 326
If it becomes apparent during the course or other information whose disclosure is IAC 6.5–4–17 consolidate the
of the proceedings that the contested restricted by statute. Multimedia identification numbers of the Kimball
amount of the claim is more than $1000, submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Office facilities in Jasper Indiana from
the Copyright Royalty Judges will accompanied by a written comment. 00046 and 00042 to 00100. The revision
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
require payment of the filing fee at such The written comment is considered the to 326 IAC 6.5–4–24 revises the
time. official comment and should include business name of the regulated source
discussion of all points you wish to from Styline Industries, Inc. Plant #8 to
* * * * * make. EPA will generally not consider OFS Brands, Inc.—Plant #3. These
comments or comment contents located administrative revisions provide clarity
1 37 CFR 351.1(b)(4); 70 FR 30901, 30903 (May outside of the primary submission (i.e. to the existing rule and are approvable
31, 2005). on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing into the Indiana SIP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Feb 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM 22FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_8684/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 8653
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject EPA Approval date Notes
effective date
* * * * * * *
Article 6.5. Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County
* * * * * * *
Rule 4. Dubois County
* * * * * * *
6.5–4–2 ........................................ Kimball Office—Jasper 15th 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Street. Register citation].
* * * * * * *
6.5–4–4 ........................................ DMI Furniture Plant No. 5 ........... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
6.5–4–17 ...................................... Kimball Office—Jasper Cherry 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Street. Register citation].
* * * * * * *
6.5–4–24 ...................................... Styline Industries, Inc. Plant #8 ... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
Rule 5. Howard County
* * * * * * *
6.5–5–2 ........................................ Chrysler, LLC-Kokomo Casting 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Plant and Kokomo Trans- Register citation].
mission Plant.
6.5–5–5 ........................................ Delco Electronics Corporation ..... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
Rule 6. Marion County
* * * * * * *
6.5–6–2 ........................................ Allison Transmission .................... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
6.5–6–25 ...................................... National Starch and Chemical 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Company. Register citation].
6.5–6–26 ...................................... International Truck and Engine 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Corporation & Indianapolis Register citation].
Casting Corporation.
* * * * * * *
6.5–6–33 ...................................... Rolls-Royce Corporation ............. 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County
* * * * * * *
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Rule 2. Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements
* * * * * * *
6.8–2–18 ...................................... Jupiter Aluminum Corporation ..... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Feb 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM 22FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_8684/page/4.svg)
![8654 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject EPA Approval date Notes
effective date
* * * * * * *
6.8–2–29 ...................................... Reed Minerals–Plant #14 ............ 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
6.8–2–34 ...................................... Huhtamaki Foodservice, Inc. ....... 05/29/2015 02/22/2016, [insert Federal
Register citation].
* * * * * * *
* * * * * www.regulations.gov or via email to I. What is the background for this
[FR Doc. 2016–03490 Filed 2–19–16; 8:45 am] blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments action?
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting On April 22, 2014 (79 FR 22415), EPA
comments. Once submitted, comments approved a request from the State of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION cannot be edited or removed from Wisconsin to redesignate the Milwaukee
AGENCY Regulations.gov. For either manner of area for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 national
submission, EPA may publish any ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
40 CFR Part 52 comment received on its public docket. In addition to approving the PM2.5
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0848; FRL–9942–56– Do not submit electronically any redesignation request, EPA approved
Region 5] information you consider to be the State’s plan for maintaining the 2006
Confidential Business Information (CBI) 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS in Milwaukee
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; or other information whose disclosure is through 2025. The PM2.5 maintenance
Revision to the Milwaukee-Racine- restricted by statute. Multimedia plan established MVEBs for PM2.5, SO2,
Waukesha 2006 24-Hour Particulate submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be VOC and NOX for 2020 and 2025 to
Matter Maintenance Plan accompanied by a written comment. account for new transportation planning
The written comment is considered the assumptions.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). official comment and should include MVEBs are the projected levels of
ACTION: Direct final rule. discussion of all points you wish to controlled emissions from the
make. EPA will generally not consider transportation sector (mobile sources)
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection comments or comment contents located that are estimated in the SIP to provide
Agency (EPA) is approving Wisconsin’s outside of the primary submission (i.e. for maintenance of the ozone standard.
December 23, 2015, state on the web, cloud, or other file sharing The transportation conformity rule
implementation plan (SIP) revision to system). For additional submission allows the MVEB to be changed as long
the Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha methods, please contact the person as the total level of emissions from all
(Milwaukee), Wisconsin 2006 24-Hour identified in the FOR FURTHER sources remains below the attainment
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) maintenance INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the levels.
plan. This SIP revision establishes new full EPA public comment policy,
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets II. What is a ‘‘safety margin’’?
information about CBI or multimedia
(MVEB) for Volatile Organic submissions, and general guidance on A ‘‘safety margin’’, as defined in the
Compounds (VOC) for the years 2020 making effective comments, please visit transportation conformity rule (40 CFR
and 2025. The MVEBs for Oxides of http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ part 93 subpart A), is the amount by
Nitrogen (NOX), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), commenting-epa-dockets. which the total projected emissions
and PM2.5 will remain the same. EPA is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: from all sources of a given pollutant are
approving the allocation of a portion of Michael Leslie, Environmental less than the total emissions that would
the safety margin for VOC in the PM2.5 Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air satisfy the applicable requirement for
maintenance plan to the 2020 and 2025 Programs Branch (AR–18J), reasonable further progress, attainment,
MVEBs. The 2020 and 2025 total year Environmental Protection Agency, or maintenance. The attainment level of
emissions of VOC for the area will Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, emissions is the level of emissions
remain below the attainment level Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–6680, during the year in which the area met
required by the transportation leslie.michael@epa.gov. the NAAQS. Table 1 gives detailed
conformity regulations. information on the safety margin for the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES: This direct final rule will be VOC portion of the Milwaukee’s 2006
Throughout this document whenever
effective April 22, 2016, unless EPA ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 24-Hour PM2.5 maintenance plan. Table
receives adverse comments by March EPA. This supplementary information 1 includes a comparison of the VOC
23, 2016. If adverse comments are section is arranged as follows: emissions in the 2010 (Wisconsin’s
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
received, EPA will publish a timely attainment year), to the projected
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the I. What is the background for this action? emissions of VOC in 2020 and 2025.
Federal Register informing the public II. What is a ‘‘safety margin’’?
III. How does this action change the
The difference between the projected
that the rule will not take effect. Milwaukee area’s 2006 24-hour PM2.5 emissions in years 2020 and 2025 and
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, maintenance plan? the actual emissions in 2010 is referred
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– IV. What action is EPA taking? to as the safety margin or the amount of
OAR–2015–0848 at http:// V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews excess emission reductions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Feb 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM 22FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_8684/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-19 23:57:08
Document Modified: 2016-02-19 23:57:08
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective April 22, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 23, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Anthony Maietta, Environmental Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 8650 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR