81 FR 87881 - Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; 2017 and 2018 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 234 (December 6, 2016)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 234 (December 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 87881-87901 | |
| FR Document | 2016-29150 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 6, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 87881-87901] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-29150] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 [Docket No. 160920866-6999-01] RIN 0648-XE904 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; 2017 and 2018 Harvest Specifications for Groundfish AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications, apportionments, and Pacific halibut prohibited species catch limits for the groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary to establish harvest limits for groundfish during the 2017 and 2018 fishing years and to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska. The intended effect of this action is to conserve and manage the groundfish resources in the GOA in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. DATES: Comments must be received by January 5, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2016-0127, by any one of the following methods:Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0127, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Electronic copies of the Alaska Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS), Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final EIS, Supplementary Information Report (SIR) to the Final EIS, and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for this action may be obtained from http://www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2015 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the groundfish resources of the GOA, dated November 2015, is available from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501, phone 907-271-2809, or from the Council's Web site at http://www.npfmc.org. The draft 2016 SAFE report for the GOA will be available from the same source. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Obren Davis, 907-586-7228. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the GOA groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the GOA under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP). The Council prepared the FMP under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801, et seq. Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and 680. The FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS, after consultation with the Council, to specify the total allowable catch (TAC) for each target species, the sum of which must be within the optimum yield (OY) range of 116,000 to 800,000 metric tons (mt) (Sec. 679.20(a)(1)(i)(B)). Section 679.20(c)(1) further requires NMFS to publish and solicit public comment on proposed annual TACs, Pacific halibut prohibited species catch (PSC) limits, and seasonal allowances of pollock and Pacific cod. The proposed harvest specifications in Tables 1 through 19 of this document satisfy these requirements. For 2017 and 2018, the sum of the proposed TAC amounts is 573,872 mt. Under Sec. 679.20(c)(3), NMFS will publish the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications after (1) considering comments received within the comment period (see DATES), (2) consulting with the Council at its December 2016 meeting, (3) considering information presented in the 2016 SIR that assesses the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS (see ADDRESSES), and (4) considering information presented in the final 2016 SAFE report prepared for the 2017 and 2018 groundfish fisheries. Other Actions Potentially Affecting the 2017 and 2018 Harvest Specifications Amendment 103: Chinook Salmon Prohibited Species Catch Limit Reapportionment Provisions for Trawl Sectors in the Western and Central GOA In December 2015, the Council recommended for Secretarial review Amendment 103 to the FMP to reapportion unused Chinook salmon PSC limits among the GOA pollock and non-pollock trawl sectors. Amendment 103 allows NMFS to reapportion the Chinook salmon PSC limits established by Amendments 93 and 97 to prevent or limit fishery closures due to attainment of sector-specific Chinook salmon PSC limits, while maintaining the annual, combined 32,500 Chinook salmon PSC limit for all sectors. The Secretary approved Amendment 103 on August 24, 2016. The final rule implementing Amendment 103 published on September 12, 2016, (81 FR 62659) and became effective on October 12, 2016. Amendment 101: Authorize Longline Pot Gear for Use in the Sablefish IFQ Fishery in the GOA NMFS issued a proposed rule to implement Amendment 101 to the FMP [[Page 87882]] for the sablefish individual fishing quota (IFQ) fisheries in the GOA on August 19, 2016 (81 FR 55408). That proposed action would authorize the use of longline pot gear in the GOA sablefish IFQ fishery. The Secretary approved Amendment 101 on November 4, 2016. If NMFS approves the final rule, NMFS expects it would be effective for the 2017 GOA sablefish IFQ fishery. Proposed Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) and TAC Specifications In October 2016, the Council, its Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC), and its Advisory Panel (AP) reviewed the most recent biological and harvest information about the condition of groundfish stocks in the GOA. This information was compiled by the GOA Groundfish Plan Team (Plan Team) and presented in the final 2015 SAFE report for the GOA groundfish fisheries, dated November 2015 (see ADDRESSES). The SAFE report contains a review of the latest scientific analyses and estimates of each species' biomass and other biological parameters, as well as summaries of the available information on the GOA ecosystem and the economic condition of the groundfish fisheries off Alaska. From these data and analyses, the Plan Team estimates and the SSC sets an overfishing level (OFL) and ABC for each species or species group. The amounts proposed for the 2017 and 2018 OFLs and ABCs are based on the 2015 SAFE report. The AP and Council recommended that the proposed 2017 and 2018 TACs be set equal to proposed ABCs for all species and species groups, with the exception of the species categories further discussed below. The proposed OFLs, ABCs, and TACs could be changed in the final harvest specifications depending on the most recent scientific information contained in the final 2016 SAFE report. The draft stock assessments that will comprise, in part, the 2016 SAFE report are available at http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/REFM/stocks/plan_team/draft_assessments.htm. In November 2016, the Plan Team will update the 2015 SAFE report to include new information collected during 2016, such as NMFS stock surveys, revised stock assessments, and catch data. The Plan Team will compile this information and produce the draft 2016 SAFE report for presentation at the December 2016 Council meeting. At that meeting, the Council will consider information in the draft 2016 SAFE report, recommendations from the November 2016 Plan Team meeting and December 2016 SSC and AP meetings, public testimony, and relevant written public comments in making its recommendations for the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(2) and (3), the Council could recommend adjusting the TACs if warranted on the biological condition of groundfish stocks or a variety of socioeconomic considerations; or if required in order to cause the sum to fall within the optimum yield range. In previous years, the OFLs and ABCs that have had the most significant changes (relative to the amount of assessed tonnage of fish) from the proposed to the final harvest specifications have been for OFLs and ABCs that are based on the most recent NMFS stock surveys. These surveys provide updated estimates of stock biomass and spatial distribution, and changes to the models used for producing stock assessments. NMFS scientists presented updated and new survey results, changes to assessment models, and accompanying stock estimates at the September 2016 Plan Team meeting, and the SSC reviewed this information at the October 2016 Council meeting. The species with possible significant model changes are Pacific cod, pollock, sablefish, and sharks. In November 2016, the Plan Team considered updated stock assessments for groundfish, which will be included in the draft 2016 SAFE report. If the draft 2016 SAFE report indicates that the stock biomass trend is increasing for a species, then the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications for that species may reflect an increase from the proposed harvest specifications. Conversely, if the draft 2016 SAFE report indicates that the stock biomass trend is decreasing for a species, then the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications may reflect a decrease from the proposed harvest specifications. The proposed 2017 and 2018 OFLs, ABCs, and TACs are based on the best available biological and socioeconomic information, including projected biomass trends, information on assumed distribution of stock biomass, and revised methods used to calculate stock biomass. The FMP specifies the formulas, or tiers, to be used to compute OFLs and ABCs. The formulas applicable to a particular stock or stock complex are determined by the level of reliable information available to the fisheries scientists. This information is categorized into a successive series of six tiers to define OFL and ABC amounts, with Tier 1 representing the highest level of information quality available and Tier 6 representing the lowest level of information quality available. The Plan Team used the FMP tier structure to calculate OFLs and ABCs for each groundfish species. The SSC adopted the proposed 2017 and 2018 OFLs and ABCs recommended by the Plan Team for all groundfish species. The Council adopted the SSC's OFL and ABC recommendations and the AP's TAC recommendations. These amounts are unchanged from the final 2017 harvest specifications published in the Federal Register on March 18, 2016 (81 FR 14740). Specification and Apportionment of TAC Amounts The Council recommended proposed 2017 and 2018 TACs that are equal to proposed ABCs for all species and species groups, with the exception of shallow-water flatfish in the Western GOA, arrowtooth flounder, flathead sole in the Western and Central GOA, ``other rockfish'' in Southeast Outside (SEO) District, Atka mackerel, and Pacific cod. The shallow-water flatfish, arrowtooth flounder, and flathead sole TACs are set to allow for harvest opportunities while conserving the halibut PSC limit for use in other fisheries. The ``other rockfish'' TAC is set to reduce the potential amount of discards in the SEO District. The Atka mackerel TAC is set to accommodate incidental catch amounts of this species in other directed fisheries. The Pacific cod TACs are reduced from ABC amounts to accommodate the State waters Pacific cod fisheries. Similarly, the combined Western, Central, and West Yakutat pollock ABC is reduced to account for the State water pollock fishery. These reductions are described below. The proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs are set to accommodate the State's guideline harvest levels (GHLs) for Pacific cod in State waters in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas, as well as in Prince William Sound (PWS). The Plan Team, SSC, AP, and Council recommended that the sum of all State and Federal water Pacific cod removals from the GOA not exceed ABC recommendations. Accordingly, the Council reduced the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs in the Eastern, Central, and Western Regulatory Areas to account for State GHLs. Therefore, the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs are less than the proposed ABCs by the following amounts: (1) Eastern GOA, 1,898 mt; (2) Central GOA, 10,653 mt; and (3) Western GOA, 10,499 mt. These amounts reflect the sum of the State's 2017 and 2018 GHLs in these areas, which are 25 percent of the Eastern and Central, and 30 percent of the Western GOA proposed ABCs. [[Page 87883]] The ABC for the pollock stock in the combined Western, Central, and West Yakutat Regulatory Areas (W/C/WYK) includes the amount for the GHL established by the State for the PWS pollock fishery. The Plan Team, SSC, AP, and Council recommended that the sum of all State and Federal water pollock removals from the GOA not exceed ABC recommendations. For 2017 and 2018, the SSC recommended and the Council approved the W/C/WYK pollock ABC, including the amount to account for the State's PWS GHL. At the November 2016 Plan Team meeting, State fisheries managers recommended setting the PWS GHL at 2.5 percent of the annual W/C/WYK pollock ABC. For 2017, this yields a PWS pollock GHL of 6,264 mt, a slight decrease from the 2016 PWS GHL of 6,358 mt. The proposed W/C/WYK 2017 and 2018 pollock ABC is 250,544 mt, and the proposed TAC is 244,280 mt. Apportionments of pollock to the W/C/WYK management areas are considered to be ``apportionments of annual catch limit (ACLs)'' rather than ``ABCs.'' This more accurately reflects that such apportionments address management, rather than biological or conservation, concerns. In addition, apportioning ACLs in this manner allow NMFS to balance any transfer of TAC from one area to another pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B) to ensure that the area-wide ACL and ABC are not exceeded. NMFS' proposed apportionments for groundfish species are based on the distribution of biomass among the regulatory areas under which NMFS manages the species. Additional regulations govern the apportionment of pollock, Pacific cod, and sablefish. Additional detail on these apportionments are described below, and briefly summarized here. NMFS proposes pollock TACs in the W/C/WYK and the SEO District of the GOA (see Table 1). NMFS also proposes seasonal apportionment of the annual pollock TAC in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA among Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630. These apportionments are divided equally among each of the following four seasons: The A season (January 20 through March 10), the B season (March 10 through May 31), the C season (August 25 through October 1), and the D season (October 1 through November 1) (Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), and Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A) and (B)). Additional detail is provided below; Table 2 lists these amounts. NMFS proposes Pacific cod TACs in the Western, Central, and Eastern GOA (see Table 1). NMFS also proposes seasonal apportionment of the Pacific cod TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas. Sixty percent of the annual TAC is apportioned to the A season for hook-and- line, pot, or jig gear from January 1 through June 10, and for trawl gear from January 20 through June 10. Forty percent of the annual TAC is apportioned to the B season for jig gear from June 10 through December 31, for hook-and-line or pot gear from September 1 through December 31, and for trawl gear from September 1 through November 1 (Sec. Sec. 679.23(d)(3) and 679.20(a)(12)). The Western and Central GOA Pacific cod TACs are allocated among various gear and operational sectors. Table 3 lists the amounts apportioned to each sector. The Council's recommendation for sablefish area apportionments takes into account the prohibition on the use of trawl gear in the SEO District of the Eastern Regulatory Area and makes available 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area ABCs to trawl gear for use as incidental catch in other groundfish fisheries in the WYK District (Sec. 679.20(a)(4)(i)). Additional detail is provided below; Tables 4 and 5 list these amounts. For 2017 and 2018, the Council recommends and NMFS proposes the OFLs, ABCs, and TACs listed in Table 1. The proposed ABCs reflect harvest amounts that are less than the specified overfishing levels. Table 1 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 OFLs, ABCs, TACs, and area apportionments of groundfish in the GOA. These amounts are consistent with the biological condition of groundfish stocks as described in the 2015 SAFE report, and adjusted for other biological and socioeconomic considerations, including maintaining the total TAC within the required OY range. The sum of the proposed TACs for all GOA groundfish is 573,872 mt for 2017 and 2018, which is within the OY range specified by the FMP. These proposed amounts and apportionments by area, season, and sector are subject to change pending consideration of the draft 2016 SAFE report and the Council's recommendations for the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications during its December 2016 meeting. Table 1--Proposed 2017 and 2018 ABCs, TACs, and OFLs of Groundfish for the Western/Central/West Yakutat, Western, Central, and Eastern Regulatory Areas, and in the West Yakutat, Southeast Outside, and Gulfwide Districts of the Gulf of Alaska [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Species Area \1\ OFL ABC TAC \2\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pollock \2\........................... Shumagin (610).......... n/a 55,657 55,657 Chirikof (620).......... n/a 123,078 123,078 Kodiak (630)............ n/a 56,336 56,336 WYK (640)............... n/a 9,209 9,209 W/C/WYK (subtotal)...... 289,937 250,544 244,280 SEO (650)............... 13,226 9,920 9,920 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 303,163 260,464 254,200 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific cod \3\....................... W....................... n/a 34,998 24,499 C....................... n/a 42,610 31,958 E....................... n/a 7,592 5,693 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 100,800 85,200 62,150 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sablefish \4\......................... W....................... n/a 1,163 1,163 C....................... n/a 3,678 3,678 WYK..................... n/a 1,348 1,348 SEO..................... n/a 2,118 2,118 [[Page 87884]] E (WYK and SEO) n/a 3,466 3,466 (subtotal). ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 9,825 8,307 8,307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shallow-water flatfish \5\............ W....................... n/a 19,159 13,250 C....................... n/a 17,680 17,680 WYK..................... n/a 2,919 2,919 SEO..................... n/a 1,006 1,006 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 50,220 40,764 34,855 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deep-water flatfish \6\............... W....................... n/a 187 187 C....................... n/a 3,516 3,516 WYK..................... n/a 3,015 3,015 SEO..................... n/a 2,563 2,563 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 11,168 9,281 9,281 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rex sole.............................. W....................... n/a 1,318 1,318 C....................... n/a 4,453 4,453 WYK..................... n/a 767 767 SEO..................... n/a 969 969 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 9,810 7,507 7,507 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arrowtooth flounder................... W....................... n/a 28,659 14,500 C....................... n/a 109,804 75,000 WYK..................... n/a 37,999 6,900 SEO..................... n/a 12,870 6,900 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 196,714 189,332 103,300 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flathead sole......................... W....................... n/a 11,080 8,650 C....................... n/a 20,307 15,400 WYK..................... n/a 2,944 2,944 SEO..................... n/a 856 856 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 43,060 35,187 27,850 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific ocean perch \7\............... W....................... n/a 2,709 2,709 C....................... n/a 16,860 16,860 WYK..................... n/a 2,818 2,818 W/C/WYK................. 26,045 22,387 22,387 SEO..................... 2,096 1,802 1,802 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 28,141 24,189 24,189 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northern rockfish \8\................. W....................... n/a 430 430 C....................... n/a 3,338 3,338 E....................... n/a 4 .............. ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 4,501 3,768 3,768 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shortraker rockfish \9\............... W....................... n/a 38 38 C....................... n/a 301 301 E....................... n/a 947 947 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 1,715 1,286 1,286 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dusky rockfish \10\................... W....................... n/a 159 159 C....................... n/a 3,791 3,791 WYK..................... n/a 251 251 SEO..................... n/a 83 83 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 5,253 4,284 4,284 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rougheye and blackspotted rockfish W....................... n/a 105 105 \11\. C....................... n/a 705 705 E....................... n/a 515 515 ----------------------------------------------- [[Page 87885]] Total................ 1,592 1,325 1,325 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Demersal shelf rockfish \12\.......... SEO..................... 364 231 231 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thornyhead rockfish \13\.............. W....................... n/a 291 291 C....................... n/a 988 988 E....................... n/a 682 682 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 2,615 1,961 1,961 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other rockfish 14 15.................. W/C combined............ n/a 1,534 1,534 WYK..................... n/a 574 574 SEO..................... n/a 3,665 200 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 7,424 5,773 2,308 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Atka mackerel......................... GW...................... 6,200 4,700 2,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Big skates \16\....................... W....................... n/a 908 908 C....................... n/a 1,850 1,850 E....................... n/a 1,056 1,056 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 5,086 3,814 3,814 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Longnose skates \17\.................. W....................... n/a 61 61 C....................... n/a 2,513 2,513 E....................... n/a 632 632 ----------------------------------------------- Total................ 4,274 3,206 3,206 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other skates \18\..................... GW...................... 2,558 1,919 1,919 Sculpins.............................. GW...................... 7,338 5,591 5,591 Sharks................................ GW...................... 6,020 4,514 4,514 Squids................................ GW...................... 1,530 1,148 1,148 Octopuses............................. GW...................... 6,504 4,878 4,878 ----------------------------------------------- Total............................. ........................ 815,875 708,629 573,872 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Regulatory areas and districts are defined at Sec. 679.2. (W = Western Gulf of Alaska; C = Central Gulf of Alaska; E = Eastern Gulf of Alaska; WYK = West Yakutat District; SEO = Southeast Outside District; GW = Gulf- wide). \2\ The combined pollock ABC for the Western, Central, and West Yakutat areas is apportioned in the Western/ Central Regulatory Areas among four statistical areas. These apportionments are considered subarea ACLs, rather than ABCs, for specification and reapportionment purposes. Table 2 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 seasonal apportionments. In the West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts of the Eastern Regulatory Area, pollock is not divided into seasonal allowances. \3\ Section 679.20(a)(12)(i) requires the allocation of the Pacific cod TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA among gear and operational sectors. The annual Pacific cod TAC is apportioned among various sectors, 60 percent to the A season and 40 percent to the B season in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA. In the Eastern Regulatory Area of the GOA, Pacific cod is allocated 90 percent for processing by the inshore component and 10 percent for processing by the offshore component. Table 3 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod seasonal apportionments. \4\ Sablefish is allocated to hook-and-line and trawl gear in 2017 and trawl gear in 2018. Tables 4 and 5 list the proposed 2017 and 2018 allocations of sablefish TACs. \5\ ``Shallow-water flatfish'' means flatfish not including ``deep-water flatfish,'' flathead sole, rex sole, or arrowtooth flounder. \6\ ``Deep-water flatfish'' means Dover sole, Greenland turbot, Kamchatka flounder, and deep-sea sole. \7\ ``Pacific ocean perch'' means Sebastes alutus. \8\ ``Northern rockfish'' means Sebastes polyspinous. For management purposes the 3 mt apportionment of ABC to the WYK District of the Eastern Gulf of Alaska has been included in the other rockfish (slope rockfish) species group. \9\ ``Shortraker rockfish'' means Sebastes borealis. \10\ ``Dusky rockfish'' means Sebastes variabilis. \11\ ``Rougheye rockfish'' means Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted). \12\ ``Demersal shelf rockfish'' means Sebastes pinniger (canary), S. nebulosus (china), S. caurinus (copper), S. maliger (quillback), S. helvomaculatus (rosethorn), S. nigrocinctus (tiger), and S. ruberrimus (yelloweye). \13\ ``Thornyhead rockfish'' means Sebastes species. \14\ ``Other rockfish (slope rockfish)'' means Sebastes aurora (aurora), S. melanostomus (blackgill), S. paucispinis (bocaccio), S. goodei (chilipepper), S. crameri (darkblotch), S. elongatus (greenstriped), S. variegatus (harlequin), S. wilsoni (pygmy), S. babcocki (redbanded), S. proriger (redstripe), S. zacentrus (sharpchin), S. jordani (shortbelly), S. brevispinis (silvergray), S. diploproa (splitnose), S. saxicola (stripetail), S. miniatus (vermilion), S. reedi (yellowmouth), S. entomelas (widow), and S. flavidus (yellowtail). In the Eastern GOA only, ``other rockfish'' also includes northern rockfish (S. polyspinous). \15\ ``Other rockfish'' in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas and in the West Yakutat District means all rockfish species included in the ``other rockfish'' and demersal shelf rockfish categories. \16\ ``Big skates'' means Raja binoculata. \17\ ``Longnose skates'' means Raja rhina. \18\ ``Other skates'' means Bathyraja and Raja spp. [[Page 87886]] Proposed Apportionment of Reserves Section 679.20(b)(2) requires NMFS to set aside 20 percent of each TAC for pollock, Pacific cod, flatfish, sculpins, sharks, squids, and octopuses in reserves for possible apportionment at a later date during the fishing year. In 2016, NMFS reapportioned all of the reserves in the final harvest specifications. For 2017 and 2018, NMFS proposes reapportionment of each of the reserves for pollock, Pacific cod, flatfish, sculpins, sharks, squids, and octopuses back into the original TAC from which the reserve was derived. NMFS anticipates, based on recent harvest patterns, that such reserves are not necessary and the entire TAC for each of these species will be caught. The TACs in Table 1 reflect this proposed reapportionment of reserve amounts for these species and species groups, i.e., each proposed TAC for the above mentioned species categories contains the full TAC recommended by the Council. Proposed Apportionments of Pollock TAC Among Seasons and Regulatory Areas, and Allocations for Processing by Inshore and Offshore Components In the GOA, pollock is apportioned by season and area, and is further allocated for processing by inshore and offshore components. Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B), the annual pollock TAC specified for the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA is apportioned into four equal seasonal allowances of 25 percent. As established by Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 through March 10, March 10 through May 31, August 25 through October 1, and October 1 through November 1, respectively. Pollock TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA are apportioned among Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A). In the A and B seasons, the apportionments have historically been based on the proportional distribution of pollock biomass based on the four most recent NMFS winter surveys. In the C and D seasons, the apportionments are in proportion to the distribution of pollock biomass based on the four most recent NMFS summer surveys. For 2017 and 2018, the Council recommends, and NMFS proposes, following the methodology used for the 2016 and 2017 harvest specifications. This methodology averages the winter and summer distribution of pollock in the Central Regulatory Area for the A season instead of using the distribution based on only the winter surveys. The average is intended to reflect the best available information about migration patterns, distribution of pollock, and the performance of the fishery in the area during the A season. For the A season, the apportionment is based on the proposed adjusted estimate of the relative distribution of pollock biomass of approximately 6 percent, 73 percent, and 21 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. For the B season, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass of approximately 6 percent, 85 percent, and 9 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. For the C and D seasons, the apportionment is based on the relative distribution of pollock biomass of approximately 41 percent, 26 percent, and 33 percent in Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. Within any fishing year, the amount by which a seasonal allowance is underharvested or overharvested may be added to, or subtracted from, subsequent seasonal allowances in a manner to be determined by the Regional Administrator (Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)). The rollover amount is limited to 20 percent of the unharvested seasonal apportionment for the statistical area. Any unharvested pollock above the 20-percent limit could be further distributed to the other statistical areas, in proportion to the estimated biomass in the subsequent season in those statistical areas (Sec. 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)). The proposed 2017 and 2018 pollock TACs in the WYK District of 9,209 mt and SEO District of 9,920 mt are not allocated by season. Section 679.20(a)(6)(i) requires the allocation of 100 percent of the pollock apportionments in all regulatory areas and all seasonal allowances to vessels catching pollock for processing by the inshore component after subtraction of pollock amounts projected by the Regional Administrator to be caught by, or delivered to, the offshore component incidental to directed fishing for other groundfish species. Thus, the amount of pollock available for harvest by vessels harvesting pollock for processing by the offshore component is that amount that will be taken as incidental catch during directed fishing for groundfish species other than pollock, up to the maximum retainable amounts allowed under Sec. 679.20(e) and (f). At this time, these incidental catch amounts of pollock are unknown and will be determined as fishing activity occurs during the fishing year by the offshore component. Table 2 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 seasonal biomass distribution of pollock in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas, area apportionments, and seasonal allowances. The amounts of pollock for processing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown. Table 2--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Distribution of Pollock in the Central and Western Regulatory Areas of the Gulf of Alaska; Seasonal Biomass Distribution, Area Apportionments; and Seasonal Allowances of Annual TAC \1\ [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Season \2\ Shumagin (Area 610) Chirikof (Area 620) Kodiak (Area 630) Total \3\ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A (Jan 20-Mar 10)....................... 3,769 (6.41%) 42,732 (72.71%) 12,272 (20.88%) 58,768 B (Mar 10-May 31)....................... 3,769 (6.41%) 49,996 (85.07%) 5,007 (8.52%) 58,768 C (Aug 25-Oct 1)........................ 24,060 (40.94%) 15,176 (25.82%) 19,529 (33.23%) 58,768 D (Oct 1-Nov 1)......................... 24,060 (40.94%) 15,175 (25.82%) 19,529 (33.23%) 58,768 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Total........................ 55,657 .............. 123,078 .............. 56,336 .............. 235,071 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Area apportionments and seasonal allowances may not total precisely due to rounding. \2\ As established by Sec. 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 through March 10, March 10 through May 31, August 25 through October 1, and October 1 through November 1, respectively. The amounts of pollock for processing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown in this table. \3\ The West Yakutat and Southeast Outside District pollock TACs are not allocated by season and are not included in the total pollock TACs shown in this table. [[Page 87887]] Proposed Annual and Seasonal Apportionments of Pacific Cod TAC Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(i), NMFS proposes allocations for the 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA among gear and operational sectors. NMFS also proposes allocating the 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs annually between the inshore and offshore components in the Eastern GOA (Sec. 679.20(a)(6)(ii)). In the Central GOA, the Pacific cod TAC is apportioned seasonally first to vessels using jig gear, and then among catcher vessels (CVs) less than 50 feet in length overall using hook- and-line gear, CVs equal to or greater than 50 feet in length overall using hook-and-line gear, catcher/processors (C/Ps) using hook-and-line gear, CVs using trawl gear, C/Ps using trawl gear, and vessels using pot gear (Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(i)(B)). In the Western GOA, the Pacific cod TAC is apportioned seasonally first to vessels using jig gear, and then among CVs using hook-and-line gear, C/Ps using hook-and-line gear, CVs using trawl gear, C/Ps using trawl gear, and vessels using pot gear (Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(i)(A)). The overall seasonal apportionments in the Western and Central GOA are 60 percent of the annual TAC to the A season and 40 percent of the annual TAC to the B season. Under Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(ii), any overage or underage of the Pacific cod allowance from the A season will be subtracted from, or added to, the subsequent B season allowance. In addition, any portion of the hook-and-line, trawl, pot, or jig sector allocations that is determined by NMFS as likely to go unharvested by a sector may be reapportioned to other sectors for harvest during the remainder of the fishing year. Pursuant to Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(i)(A) and (B), a portion of the annual Pacific cod TACs in the Western and Central GOA will be allocated to vessels with a Federal fisheries permit that use jig gear before TAC is apportioned among other non-jig sectors. In accordance with the FMP, the annual jig sector allocations may increase to up to 6 percent of the annual Western and Central GOA Pacific cod TACs, depending on the annual performance of the jig sector (see Table 1 of Amendment 83 to the FMP for a detailed discussion of the jig sector allocation process (76 FR 74670, December 1, 2011)). Jig sector allocation increases are established for a minimum of 2 years. NMFS has evaluated the historical harvest performance of the jig sector in the Western and Central GOA, and is establishing the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod apportionments to this sector based on the jig performance through 2015. NMFS proposes that the jig sector receive 3.5 percent of the annual Pacific cod TAC in the Western GOA. This includes a base allocation of 1.5 percent and an additional 2.0 percent because this sector harvested greater than 90 percent of its initial 2012 and 2014 allocations in the Western GOA. NMFS also proposes that the jig sector would receive 1.0 percent of the annual Pacific cod TAC in the Central GOA. This includes a base allocation of 1.0 percent and no additional performance increase. These historical Pacific cod jig allocations, catch, and percent allocation changes are listed in Example 1. Example 1--Summary of Western GOA and Central GOA Management Area Pacific Cod Catch by Jig Gear in 2012 Through 2015, and Corresponding Percent Allocation Changes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Percent of Area Year Initial Initial TAC Catch (mt) initial >90% of initial Change to percent percent of TAC allocation allocation allocation? allocation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WGOA.......................... 2012 1.5 315 322 102 Y................ Increase 1% 2013 2.5 530 273 52 N................ None 2014 2.5 573 785 137 Y................ Increase 1% 2015 3.5 948 55 6 N................ None CGOA.......................... 2012 1.0 427 400 94 Y................ Increase 1% 2013 2.0 740 202 27 N................ None 2014 2.0 797 262 33 N................ None 2015 1.0 460 355 77 N................ Decrease 1% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NMFS will re-evaluate the annual 2015 and 2016 harvest performance of each jig sector when the 2016 fishing year is complete to determine whether to change the jig sector allocations proposed by this action in conjunction with the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. The current catch through November 2016 by the Western GOA jig sector indicates that the Pacific cod allocation percentage to this sector would probably decrease by 1 percent in 2017. Also, the current catch by the Central GOA jig sector indicates that this sector's Pacific cod allocation percentage would not change in 2017. The jig sector allocations are further apportioned between the A (60 percent) and B (40 percent) seasons (Sec. 679.20(a)(12)(i) and Sec. 679.23(d)(3)(iii)). Table 3 lists the seasonal apportionments and allocations of the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific cod TACs. [[Page 87888]] Table 3--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Seasonal Apportionments and Allocations of Pacific Cod Total Allowable Catch Amounts in the GOA; Allocations in the Western GOA and Central GOA Sectors, and the Eastern GOA for Processing by the Inshore and Offshore Components [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A season B season --------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Sector Sector Regulatory area and sector allocation percentage of Seasonal percentage of Seasonal (mt) annual non- allowances annual non- allowances jig TAC (mt) jig TAC (mt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Western GOA: Jig (3.5% of TAC)........... 857 N/A 514 N/A 343 Hook-and-line CV............ 331 0.70 165 0.70 165 Hook-and-line C/P........... 4,681 10.90 2,577 8.90 2,104 Trawl CV.................... 9,078 27.70 6,549 10.70 2,530 Trawl C/P................... 567 0.90 213 1.50 355 Pot CV and Pot C/P.......... 8,984 19.80 4,681 18.20 4,303 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total................... 24,499 60.00 14,699 40.00 9,799 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Central GOA: Jig (1.0% of TAC)........... 320 N/A 192 N/A 128 Hook-and-line <50 CV........ 4,620 9.32 2,947 5.29 1,673 Hook-and-line >=50 CV....... 2,122 5.61 1,775 1.10 347 Hook-and-line C/P........... 1,615 4.11 1,299 1.00 316 Trawl CV \1\................ 13,156 21.13 6,687 20.45 6,470 Trawl C/P................... 1,328 2.00 634 2.19 694 Pot CV and Pot C/P.......... 8,797 17.83 5,641 9.97 3,156 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total................... 31,958 60.00 19,175 40.00 12,783 --------------------------------------------------------------- Eastern GOA: .............. Inshore (90% of Annual TAC) Offshore (10% of Annual TAC) --------------------------------------------------------------- 5,693 5,124 569 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Trawl vessels participating in Rockfish Program cooperatives receive 3.81 percent, or 1,409 mt, of the annual Central GOA TAC (see Table 28c to 50 CFR part 679), which is deducted from the Trawl CV B season allowance (see Table 8). Proposed Allocations of the Sablefish TACs Amounts to Vessels Using Hook-and-Line and Trawl Gear Sections 679.20(a)(4)(i) and (ii) require allocations of sablefish TACs for each of the regulatory areas and districts to hook-and-line and trawl gear. In the Western and Central Regulatory Areas, 80 percent of each TAC is allocated to hook-and-line gear, and 20 percent of each TAC is allocated to trawl gear. In the Eastern Regulatory Area, 95 percent of the TAC is allocated to hook-and-line gear and 5 percent is allocated to trawl gear. The trawl gear allocation in the Eastern GOA may only be used to support incidental catch of sablefish in directed fisheries for other target species (Sec. 679.20(a)(4)(i)). In recognition of the prohibition against trawl gear in the SEO District of the Eastern Regulatory Area, the Council recommended and NMFS proposes the allocation of 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the WYK District, making the remainder of the WYK sablefish TAC available to vessels using hook- and-line gear. NMFS proposes to allocate 100 percent of the sablefish TAC in the SEO District to vessels using hook-and-line gear. This action results in a proposed 2017 allocation of 173 mt to trawl gear and 1,175 mt to hook-and-line gear in the WYK District, a 2,118 mt to hook-and-line gear in the SEO District, and a 2018 allocation of 173 mt to trawl gear in the WYK District. Table 4 lists the allocations of the proposed 2017 sablefish TACs to hook-and-line and trawl gear. Table 5 lists the allocations of the proposed 2018 sablefish TACs to trawl gear. The Council recommended that the hook-and-line sablefish TAC be established annually to ensure that the sablefish IFQ fishery is conducted concurrently with the halibut IFQ fishery and is based on recent survey information. The Council also recommended that only the trawl sablefish TAC be established for 2 years so that retention of incidental catch of sablefish by trawl gear could commence in January in the second year of the groundfish harvest specifications. Since there is an annual assessment for sablefish and the final harvest specifications are expected to be published before the IFQ season begins (typically, in early March), the Council recommended that the sablefish TAC be set annually, rather than for 2 years, so that the best available scientific information could be considered in establishing the ABCs and TACs. With the exception of the trawl allocations that are provided to the Rockfish Program cooperatives (see Table 28c to part 679), directed fishing for sablefish with trawl gear is closed during the fishing year. Also, fishing for groundfish with trawl gear is prohibited prior to January 20. Therefore, it is not likely that the sablefish allocation to trawl gear would be reached before the effective date of the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. [[Page 87889]] Table 4--Proposed 2017 Sablefish Total Allowable Catch (TAC) in the Gulf of Alaska and Allocations to Hook-and- Line and Trawl Gear [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hook-and-line Area/district TAC allocation Trawl allocation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Western................................................... 1,163 930 233 Central \1\............................................... 3,678 2,942 736 West Yakutat \2\.......................................... 1,348 1,175 173 Southeast Outside......................................... 2,118 2,118 0 ----------------------------------------------------- Total................................................. 8,307 7,166 1,142 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The trawl allocation to the Central Regulatory Area is further reduced by the sablefish apportioned to the Rockfish Program cooperatives (378 mt). See Table 8. This results in 358 mt being available for the non- Rockfish Program trawl fisheries. \2\ The proposed trawl allocation is based on allocating 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area (West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts combined) sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the West Yakutat District. Table 5--Proposed 2018 Sablefish Total Allowable Catch (TAC) in the Gulf of Alaska and Allocation to Trawl Gear 1 [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hook-and-line Area/district TAC allocation Trawl allocation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Western................................................... 1,163 n/a 233 Central \2\............................................... 3,678 n/a 736 West Yakutat \3\.......................................... 1,348 n/a 173 Southeast Outside......................................... 2,118 n/a 0 ----------------------------------------------------- Total................................................. 8,307 n/a 1,142 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The trawl allocation to the Central Regulatory Area is further reduced by the sablefish apportioned to the Rockfish Program cooperatives (378 mt). See Table 8. This results in 358 mt being available for the non- Rockfish Program trawl fisheries. \2\ The Council recommended that harvest specifications for the hook-and-line gear sablefish Individual Fishing Quota fisheries be limited to 1 year. \3\ The proposed trawl allocation is based on allocating 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area (West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts combined) sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the West Yakutat District. Proposed Apportionments to the Rockfish Program These proposed 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications for the GOA include the fishery cooperative allocations and sideboard limitations established by the Rockfish Program. Program participants are primarily trawl CVs and trawl C/Ps, with limited participation by vessels using longline gear. The Rockfish Program assigns quota share and cooperative quota to participants for primary (Pacific ocean perch, northern rockfish, and dusky rockfish) and secondary species (Pacific cod, rougheye rockfish, sablefish, shortraker rockfish, and thornyhead rockfish), allows a participant holding a license limitation program (LLP) license with rockfish quota share to form a rockfish cooperative with other persons, and allows holders of C/P LLP licenses to opt out of the fishery. The Rockfish Program also has an entry level fishery for rockfish primary species for vessels using longline gear. Under the Rockfish Program, rockfish primary species in the Central GOA are allocated to participants after deducting for incidental catch needs in other directed groundfish fisheries. Participants in the Rockfish Program also receive a portion of the Central GOA TAC of specific secondary species. Besides groundfish species, the Rockfish Program allocates a portion of the halibut PSC limit (191 mt) from the third season deep-water species fishery allowance for the GOA trawl fisheries to Rockfish Program participants (Sec. 679.81(d)). Rockfish Program sideboards and halibut PSC limits are discussed below. Additionally, the Rockfish Program establishes sideboard limits to restrict the ability of harvesters that operate under the Rockfish Program to increase their participation in other, non-Rockfish Program fisheries. These restrictions are discussed in a subsequent section titled ``Rockfish Program Groundfish Sideboard and Halibut PSC Limitations.'' Section 679.81(a)(2)(ii) requires allocations of 5 mt of Pacific ocean perch, 5 mt of northern rockfish, and 30 mt of dusky rockfish to the entry level longline fishery in 2017 and 2018. The allocation for the entry level longline fishery would increase incrementally each year if the catch exceeds 90 percent of the allocation of a species. The incremental increase in the allocation would continue each year until it is the maximum percentage of the TAC for that species. In 2016, the catch did not exceed 90 percent of any allocated rockfish species. Therefore, NMFS is not proposing an increase to the entry level longline fishery 2017 and 2018 allocations in the Central GOA. The remainder of the TACs for the rockfish primary species would be allocated to the CV and C/P cooperatives. Table 6 lists the allocations of the proposed 2017 and 2018 TACs for each rockfish primary species to the entry level longline fishery, the incremental increase for future years, and the maximum percentage of the TAC for the entry level longline fishery. [[Page 87890]] Table 6--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Allocations of Rockfish Primary Species to the Entry Level Longline Fishery in the Central Gulf of Alaska ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incremental increase in 2018 if >=90 percent of Up to maximum Rockfish primary species 2017 and 2018 allocations 2017 allocation is percent of each harvested TAC of: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific ocean perch.................... 5 metric tons............. 5 metric tons............ 1 Northern rockfish...................... 5 metric tons............. 5 metric tons............ 2 Dusky rockfish......................... 30 metric tons............ 20 metric tons........... 5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 679.81(a)(2) requires allocations of rockfish primary species among various components of the Rockfish Program. Table 7 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 allocations of rockfish in the Central GOA to the entry level longline fishery, and Rockfish CV and C/P Cooperatives in the Rockfish Program. NMFS also proposes setting aside incidental catch amounts (ICAs) for other directed fisheries in the Central GOA of 1,500 mt of Pacific ocean perch, 300 mt of northern rockfish, and 250 mt of dusky rockfish. These amounts are based on recent average incidental catches in the Central GOA by other groundfish fisheries. Allocations among vessels belonging to CV or C/P cooperatives are not included in these proposed harvest specifications. Rockfish Program applications for CV cooperatives and C/P cooperatives are not due to NMFS until March 1 of each calendar year; therefore, NMFS cannot calculate 2017 and 2018 allocations in conjunction with these proposed harvest specifications. NMFS will post these allocations on the Alaska Region Web site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/rockfish/ when they become available after March 1. Table 7--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Allocations of Rockfish Primary Species in the Central Gulf of Alaska to the Entry Level Longline Fishery and Rockfish Cooperatives in the Rockfish Program [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allocation to Incidental catch the entry level Allocation to Rockfish primary species TAC allowance (ICA) TAC minus ICA longline \1\ the Rockfish fishery Cooperatives \2\ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific ocean perch........................................... 16,860 1,500 15,360 5 15,535 Northern rockfish............................................. 3,338 300 3,038 5 3,033 Dusky rockfish................................................ 3,791 250 3,541 30 3,511 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total..................................................... 23,989 2,050 21,939 40 21,899 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Longline gear includes hook-and-line, jig, troll, and handline gear. \2\ Rockfish cooperatives include vessels in CV and C/P cooperatives. Section 679.81(c) requires allocations of rockfish secondary species to CV and C/P cooperatives in the GOA. CV cooperatives receive allocations of Pacific cod, sablefish from the trawl gear allocation, and thornyhead rockfish. C/P cooperatives receive allocations of sablefish from the trawl allocation, rougheye rockfish, shortraker rockfish, and thornyhead rockfish. Table 8 lists the apportionments of the proposed 2017 and 2018 TACs of rockfish secondary species in the Central GOA to CV and C/P cooperatives. Table 8--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Apportionments of Rockfish Secondary Species in the Central GOA to Catcher Vessel and Catcher/Processor Cooperatives [Values are in metric tons] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Catcher vessel cooperatives Catcher/processor -------------------------------- cooperatives Rockfish secondary species Central GOA ------------------------------- annual TAC Percentage of Apportionment Percentage of Apportionment TAC (mt) TAC (mt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific cod..................... 31,958 3.81 1,218 0.0 0.0 Sablefish....................... 3,678 6.78 249 3.51 129 Shortraker rockfish............. 301 0.0 0 40.00 120 Rougheye rockfish............... 705 0.0 0 58.87 415 Thornyhead rockfish............. 988 7.84 77 26.50 262 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Halibut PSC Limits Section 679.21(d) establishes annual halibut PSC limit apportionments to trawl and hook-and-line gear, and authorizes the establishment of apportionments for pot gear. In October 2016, the Council recommended halibut PSC limits of 1,706 mt for trawl gear, 257 mt for hook-and-line gear, and 9 mt for the demersal shelf rockfish (DSR) fishery in the SEO District. The DSR fishery in the SEO District is defined at Sec. 679.21(d)(2)(ii)(A). This fishery is apportioned 9 mt of the halibut PSC limit in recognition of its small-scale harvests of groundfish. NMFS estimates low halibut bycatch in the DSR fishery because (1) the duration of the DSR fisheries and the gear soak times are short, (2) the DSR fishery [[Page 87891]] occurs in the winter when less overlap occurs in the distribution of DSR and halibut, and (3) the directed commercial DSR fishery has a low DSR TAC. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game sets the commercial GHL for the DSR fishery after deducting (1) estimates of DSR incidental catch in all fisheries (including halibut and subsistence) and (2) the allocation to the DSR sport fish fishery. Of the 231 mt TAC for DSR in 2016, 188 mt were available for the DSR commercial directed fishery, of which 8 mt were harvested. The FMP authorizes the Council to exempt specific gear from the halibut PSC limits. NMFS, after consultation with the Council, proposes to exempt pot gear, jig gear, and the sablefish IFQ hook-and-line gear fishery categories from the non-trawl halibut PSC limit for 2017 and 2018. The Council recommended, and NMFS is proposing, these exemptions because (1) pot gear fisheries have low annual halibut bycatch mortality, (2) IFQ program regulations prohibit discard of halibut if any halibut IFQ permit holder on board a CV holds unused halibut IFQ (Sec. 679.7(f)(11)), (3) some sablefish IFQ permit holders hold halibut IFQ permits and are therefore required to retain the halibut they catch while fishing sablefish IFQ, and (4) NMFS estimates negligible halibut mortality for the jig gear fisheries. NMFS estimates halibut mortality is negligible in the jig gear fisheries given the small amount of groundfish harvested by jig gear, the selective nature of jig gear, and the high survival rates of halibut caught and released with jig gear. The best available information on estimated halibut bycatch consists of data collected by fisheries observers during 2016. The calculated halibut bycatch mortality through November 8, 2016, is 1,321 mt for trawl gear and 206 mt for hook-and-line gear for a total halibut mortality of 1,527 mt. This halibut mortality was calculated using groundfish and halibut catch data from the NMFS Alaska Region's catch accounting system. This accounting system contains historical and recent catch information compiled from each Alaska groundfish fishery. Section 679.21(d)(4)(i) and (ii) authorizes NMFS to seasonally apportion the halibut PSC limits after consultation with the Council. The FMP and regulations require that the Council and NMFS consider the following information in seasonally apportioning halibut PSC limits: (1) Seasonal distribution of halibut, (2) seasonal distribution of target groundfish species relative to halibut distribution, (3) expected halibut bycatch needs on a seasonal basis relative to changes in halibut biomass and expected catch of target groundfish species, (4) expected bycatch rates on a seasonal basis, (5) expected changes in directed groundfish fishing seasons, (6) expected actual start of fishing effort, and (7) economic effects of establishing seasonal halibut allocations on segments of the target groundfish industry. Based on public comment and the information presented in the final 2016 SAFE report, the Council may recommend or NMFS may make changes to the seasonal, gear-type, or fishery category apportionments of halibut PSC limits for the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. The final 2016 and 2017 harvest specifications (81 FR 14740, March 18, 2016) summarized the Council's and NMFS' findings with respect to halibut PSC for each of these FMP considerations. The Council's and NMFS' findings for 2017 are unchanged from 2016. Table 9 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific halibut PSC limits, allowances, and apportionments. The halibut PSC limits in these tables reflect the halibut PSC limits set forth at Sec. 679.21(d)(2) and Sec. 679.21(d)(3). Sections 679.21(d)(4)(iii) and (iv) specify that any underages or overages of a seasonal apportionment of a PSC limit will be deducted from or added to the next respective seasonal apportionment within the fishing year. Table 9--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Pacific Halibut PSC Limits, Allowances, and Apportionments [Values are in metric tons] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trawl gear Hook-and-line gear \1\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other than DSR DSR Season Percent Amount --------------------------------------------------------------- Season Percent Amount Season Amount ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- January 20-April 1.......... 27.5 469 January 1-June 86 221 January 1- 9 10. December 31. April 1-July 1.............. 20 341 June 10- 2 5 September 1. July 1-September 1.......... 30 512 September 1- 12 31 December 31. September 1-October 1....... 7.5 128 October 1-December 31....... 15 256 -------------------- -------------------- --------- Total................... ........ 1,706 ............... ........ 257 ............... 9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Pacific halibut prohibited species catch (PSC) limit for hook-and-line gear is allocated to the demersal shelf rockfish (DSR) fishery and fisheries other than DSR. The hook-and-line sablefish fishery is exempt from halibut PSC limits, as are pot and jig gear for all groundfish fisheries. Section 679.21(d)(3)(ii) authorizes further apportionment of the trawl halibut PSC limit as bycatch allowances to trawl fishery categories. The annual apportionments are based on each category's proportional share of the anticipated halibut bycatch mortality during a fishing year and optimization of the total amount of groundfish harvest under the halibut PSC limit. The fishery categories for the trawl halibut PSC limits are (1) a deep-water species fishery, composed of sablefish, rockfish, deep-water flatfish, rex sole, and arrowtooth flounder; and (2) a shallow-water species fishery, composed of pollock, Pacific cod, shallow-water flatfish, flathead sole, Atka mackerel, skates and ``other species'' (sculpins, sharks, squids, and octopuses) (Sec. 679.21(d)(3)(iii)). Table 10 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 seasonal apportionments of trawl halibut PSC limits between the trawl gear deep-water and the shallow-water species fisheries. Table 28d to 50 CFR part 679 specifies the amount of the trawl halibut PSC limit that is assigned to the CV and C/P sectors that are participating in the Central GOA Rockfish Program. This includes 117 mt of halibut PSC limit to the CV sector and 74 mt of halibut PSC limit to the C/P sector. These amounts are allocated from the trawl deep-water species fishery's halibut PSC third seasonal apportionment. Section 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(B) limits the amount of the halibut PSC limit [[Page 87892]] allocated to Rockfish Program participants that could be re-apportioned to the general GOA trawl fisheries to no more than 55 percent of the unused annual halibut PSC apportioned to Rockfish Program participants. The remainder of the unused Rockfish Program halibut PSC limit is unavailable for use by vessels directed fishing with trawl gear for the remainder of the fishing year (Sec. 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(C)). Table 10--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Seasonal Apportionments of the Pacific Halibut PSC Limit Apportioned Between the Trawl Gear Shallow-Water and Deep-Water Species Fisheries [Values are in metric tons] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Season Shallow-water Deep-water \1\ Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- January 20-April 1........................................ 384 85 469 April 1-July 1............................................ 85 256 341 July 1-September 1........................................ 171 341 512 September 1-October 1..................................... 128 (\3\) 128 ----------------------------------------------------- Subtotal, January 20-October 1........................ 768 682 1,450 October 1-December 31 \2\................................. ................ ................ 256 ----------------------------------------------------- Total............................................. ................ ................ 1,706 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Vessels participating in cooperatives in the Rockfish Program will receive 191 mt of the third season (July 1 through September 1) deep-water species fishery halibut PSC apportionment. \2\ There is no apportionment between trawl shallow-water and deep-water species fisheries during the fifth season (October 1 through December 31). \3\ Any remainder. Section 679.21(d)(2) requires that the ``other hook-and-line fishery'' halibut PSC apportionment to vessels using hook-and-line gear must be divided between CVs and C/Ps. NMFS must calculate the halibut PSC limit apportionments for the entire GOA to hook-and-line CVs and C/ Ps in accordance with Sec. 679.21(d)(2)(iii) in conjunction with these harvest specifications. A comprehensive description and example of the calculations necessary to apportion the ``other hook-and-line fishery'' halibut PSC limit between the hook-and-line CV and C/P sectors were included in the proposed rule to implement Amendment 83 to the FMP (76 FR 44700, July 26, 2011) and is not repeated here. For 2017 and 2018, NMFS proposes annual halibut PSC limit apportionments of 129 mt and 128 mt to the hook-and-line CV and hook- and-line C/P sectors, respectively. The 2017 and 2018 annual halibut PSC limits are divided into three seasonal apportionments, using seasonal percentages of 86 percent, 2 percent, and 12 percent. Table 11 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 annual halibut PSC limits and seasonal apportionments between the hook-and-line CV and hook-and-line C/P sectors in the GOA. No later than November 1 of each year, NMFS calculates the projected unused amount of halibut PSC limit by either of the hook-and- line sectors for the remainder of the year. The projected unused amount of halibut PSC limit is made available to the other hook-and-line sector for the remainder of that fishing year if NMFS determines that an additional amount of halibut PSC limit is necessary for that sector to continue its directed fishing operations (Sec. 679.21(d)(2)(iii)(C)). Table 11--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Apportionments of the ``Other Hook-and-Line Fisheries'' Halibut PSC Allowance Between the Hook-and-Line Gear Catcher Vessel and Catcher/Processor Sectors [Values are in metric tons] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sector ``Other than DSR'' Hook-and-line Sector annual Season Seasonal seasonal allowance sector amount percentage amount ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 257.................. Catcher Vessel... 129 January 1-June 10..... 86 111 .............. June 10-September 1... 2 3 .............. September 1-December 12 15 31. Catcher/Processor 128 January 1-June 10..... 86 110 .............. June 10-September 1... 2 3 .............. September 1-December 12 15 31. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Halibut Discard Mortality Rates To monitor halibut bycatch mortality allowances and apportionments, the Regional Administrator uses observed halibut incidental catch rates, halibut discard mortality rates (DMRs), and estimates of groundfish catch to project when a fishery's halibut bycatch mortality allowance or seasonal apportionment is reached. Halibut incidental catch rates are based on observers' estimates of halibut incidental catch in the groundfish fishery. DMRs are estimates of the proportion of incidentally caught halibut that do not survive after being returned to the sea. The cumulative halibut mortality that accrues to a particular halibut PSC limit is the product of a DMR multiplied by the estimated halibut PSC. DMRs are estimated using the best information available in conjunction with the annual GOA stock assessment process. The DMR methodology and findings are included as an appendix to the annual GOA groundfish SAFE report. Historically, DMRs consisted of long-term averages of annual DMRs within target fisheries that were defined by management area, gear, and target species. Since the late 1990s, halibut [[Page 87893]] DMRs were calculated by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), which then provided the estimates to the NMFS for application in managing halibut bycatch limits. DMRs specified through the Council process and used for catch accounting by NMFS have consisted of long- term averages of annual estimates within target fisheries that are defined by region, gear, and target species. Long-term averages are taken from annual estimates for the most recent 10-year period with the number of years with data to support annual DMR estimates varying among fisheries. Fishery-specific DMRs, once calculated, have generally been put in place for 3-year increments. NMFS proposes to revise methods for estimating DMRs consistent with those methods developed by the halibut DMR working group and recommended by the Council at its October 2016 meeting. NMFS proposes for the 2017 and 2018 GOA groundfish harvest specifications revised DMRs consistent with modified DMR estimation methodology. The proposed change will make the DMR process transparent, transferable, and allow for review by all agencies/entities involved. The Alaska Region will program the revised DMRs into its groundfish catch accounting system to monitor the 2017 and 2018 halibut bycatch allowances (see Tables 9, 10, and 11). The DMRs proposed for 2017 and 2018 GOA groundfish harvest specifications reflect an ongoing effort by the Council to improve the estimation of DMRs in the Alaska groundfish fisheries. The halibut DMR working group, consisting of the IPHC, Council, and NMFS Alaska Region staff, recommended the following broad changes to the DMR estimation method: Implementation of sampling design consistent with sampling protocols used under the Observer Restructuring Program; categorization of data of halibut viability based on vessel operations (sorting and handling practices, gear type, and processing sector) rather than target fisheries; and revision of reference timeframes to obtain estimates that are more responsive to changes in how the groundfish fisheries are observed and managed. These recommendations, and others, are described below. Revise the DMR estimation methodology for consistency with the sampling protocols instituted in 2013 through the restructured Observer Program. The Observer Program randomizes sampling of fishing trips within operational groupings, sampling of hauls within fishing trips, and sampling of biological data within hauls. Basing halibut DMR estimation on a sampling design consistent with Observer Program sampling protocols should reduce the potential for sampling bias, improve data on operational causes of variation in post-capture halibut viability, and promote the ability for NMFS to make timely improvements to halibut DMR estimation in the future. Incorporate the use of vessel operations into DMR estimation methodology. This incorporates data about the viability (likelihood to survive) of discarded halibut into DMR calculations. Data based on different vessel operational categories, such as sorting practices, handling practices, gear type, and processing sectors (i.e. CVs, CPs, and CVs delivering to motherships), provide better information on halibut viability. NMFS expects that incorporating this information into the DMR estimation methodology will yield a more precise estimate of actual mortality. Remove the use of target fishery. Fishery targets do not necessarily characterize statistical and/or vessel operational differences in the sampling or handling of halibut PSC. Using fishery target aggregations may have reduced the quality of DMR estimates due to small sample sizes or by combining vessel operations with very important differences in sampling and handling characteristics. Change the reference time-frame for DMR calculations. Rather than using 10-year average rates, the revised methodology estimates DMRs based on and initial 3-year average rates. Using 2013 as the starting year is more responsive to, and better aligns DMR calculation methodology with, the 2013 restructured Observer Program's sampling protocols. Using 2013 as the base year, NMFS and the Council will evaluate the time frame each year. Evaluating the time frame each year will enable NMFS and the Council to update the methodology and the halibut DMRs based on the best available information. The working group's discussion paper also included a comparison of the total amount of halibut mortality that accrues using current DMRs versus the working group's recommended DMRs. Calculating the 2015 halibut mortality using specified DMRs yielded 1,620 mt of halibut mortality, whereas using the recommended DMRs yielded 1,688 mt of halibut morality (a four percent increase). Calculating the 2016 halibut mortality (through September 2016) yielded 1,243 mt of halibut mortality, versus 1,256 mt of halibut mortality when applying the recommended DMRs (a one percent increase). These proposed estimation methods, and recommendations for 2017 and 2018 halibut DMRs, were presented to the Plan Team in September 2016. The Plan Team concurred with the revised methodology, as well as the working group's halibut DMR recommendations for 2017 and 2018. The Council agreed with these recommendations at the Council's October 2016 meeting. Additionally, in April 2016 the SSC reviewed the methodology and made a number of suggestions for improving and refining it. The working group has incorporated those suggestions into its DMR estimation methodology. The working group's discussion of the revised halibut DMR methodology, including the comparative assessment, is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES). Table 12 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 DMRs. Table 12--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Halibut Discard Mortality Rates for Vessels Fishing in the Gulf of Alaska [Values are percent of halibut assumed to be dead] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Discard Gear Sector Program mortality rate (percent) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hook-and-line........................... C/P....................... non-Rockfish Program...... 11 Hook-and-line........................... CV........................ non-Rockfish Program...... 12 Pot..................................... CV and C/P................ non-Rockfish Program...... 10 Pelagic trawl........................... CV........................ Rockfish Program.......... 100 Non-pelagic trawl....................... CV........................ Rockfish Program.......... 85 Pelagic trawl........................... CV........................ non-Rockfish Program...... 100 [[Page 87894]] Non-pelagic trawl....................... CV........................ non-Rockfish Program...... 63 Non-pelagic trawl....................... C/P and Mothership........ non-Rockfish Program...... 85 Non-pelagic trawl....................... C/P....................... Rockfish Program.......... 85 Pelagic trawl........................... C/P....................... Rockfish Program.......... 100 Pelagic trawl........................... C/P....................... non-Rockfish Program...... 100 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chinook Salmon Prohibited Species Catch Limit Amendment 93 to the FMP (77 FR 42629, July 20, 2012) established separate Chinook salmon PSC limits in the Western and Central GOA in the directed pollock trawl fishery. These limits require NMFS to close the pollock directed fishery in the Western and Central regulatory areas of the GOA if the applicable limit is reached (Sec. 679.21(h)(8)). The annual Chinook salmon PSC limits in the pollock directed fishery of 6,684 salmon in the Western GOA and 18,316 salmon in the Central GOA are set in Sec. 679.21(h)(2)(i) and (ii). In addition, all salmon (regardless of species), taken in the pollock directed fisheries in the Western and Central GOA must be retained until an observer at the processing facility that takes delivery of the catch is provided an opportunity to count the number of salmon and to collect any scientific data or biological samples from the salmon (Sec. 679.21(h)(6)). Amendment 97 to the FMP (79 FR 71350, December 2, 2014) established an initial annual PSC limit of 7,500 Chinook salmon for the non-pollock groundfish fisheries. This limit is apportioned among three sectors: 3,600 Chinook salmon to trawl C/Ps; 1,200 Chinook salmon to trawl CVs participating in the Rockfish Program; and 2,700 Chinook salmon to trawl CVs not participating in the Rockfish Program that are fishing for groundfish species other than pollock (Sec. 679.21(h)(4)). NMFS will monitor the Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock GOA groundfish fisheries and close an applicable sector if it reaches its Chinook salmon PSC limit. The Chinook salmon PSC limit for two sectors, trawl C/Ps and trawl CVs not participating in the Rockfish Program, may be increased in subsequent years based on the performance of these two sectors and their ability to minimize their use of their respective Chinook salmon PSC limits. If either or both of these two sectors limits its use of Chinook salmon PSC to a certain threshold amount in 2016, that sector will receive an incremental increase to its 2017 Chinook salmon PSC limit (Sec. 679.21(h)(4)). NMFS will evaluate the annual Chinook salmon PSC by trawl C/Ps and non-Rockfish Program CVs when the 2016 fishing year is complete to determine whether to increase the Chinook salmon PSC limits for these two sectors. Based on preliminary 2016 Chinook salmon PSC data, the trawl C/P sector will receive an incremental increase of its Chinook salmon PSC limit, as will the non- Rockfish Program CV sector. This evaluation will be completed in conjunction with the final 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. As described earlier in this preamble, Amendment 103 to the FMP became effective in 2016. The regulations associated with Amendment 103 authorize NMFS to use inseason management actions to reapportion unused Chinook salmon PSC among the pollock and non-pollock sectors. As of November 15, 2016, NMFS has not exercised this authority, as none of the trawl sectors have needed such reapportionments. American Fisheries Act (AFA) Catcher/Processor and Catcher Vessel Groundfish Sideboard Limits Section 679.64 establishes groundfish harvesting and processing sideboard limits on AFA C/Ps and CVs in the GOA. These sideboard limits are necessary to protect the interests of fishermen and processors who do not directly benefit from the AFA from those fishermen and processors who receive exclusive harvesting and processing privileges under the AFA. Section 679.7(k)(1)(ii) prohibits listed AFA C/Ps from harvesting any species of fish in the GOA. Additionally, Sec. 679.7(k)(1)(iv) prohibits listed AFA C/Ps from processing any pollock harvested in a directed pollock fishery in the GOA and any groundfish harvested in Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. AFA CVs that are less than 125 ft (38.1 meters) length overall, have annual landings of pollock in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands of less than 5,100 mt, and have made at least 40 landings of GOA groundfish from 1995 through 1997 are exempt from GOA sideboard limits under Sec. 679.64(b)(2)(ii). Sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA CVs operating in the GOA are based on their traditional harvest levels of TAC in groundfish fisheries covered by the FMP. Section 679.64(b)(3)(iv) establishes the groundfish sideboard limitations in the GOA based on the retained catch of non-exempt AFA CVs of each sideboard species from 1995 through 1997 divided by the TAC for that species over the same period. Table 13 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 groundfish sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA CVs. NMFS will deduct all targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by non-exempt AFA CVs from the sideboard limits listed in Table 13. [[Page 87895]] Table 13--Proposed 2017 and 2018 GOA Non-Exempt American Fisheries Act Catcher Vessel (CV) Groundfish Sideboard Limits [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ratio of 1995- Proposed 2017 1997 non- Proposed 2017 and 2018 non- Species Apportionments Area/component exempt AFA CV and 2018 TACs exempt AFA CV by season/gear catch to 1995- \3\ sideboard 1997 TAC limit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pollock...................... A Season-- Shumagin (610). 0.6047 3,769 2,279 January 20- Chirikof (620). 0.1167 42,732 4,987 March 10. Kodiak (630)... 0.2028 12,272 2,489 B Season--March Shumagin (610). 0.6047 3,769 2,279 10-May 31. Chirikof (620). 0.1167 49,996 5,835 Kodiak (630)... 0.2028 5,007 1,015 C Season--August Shumagin (610). 0.6047 24,060 14,549 25-October 1. Chirikof (620). 0.1167 15,176 1,771 Kodiak (630)... 0.2028 19,529 3,960 D Season-- Shumagin (610). 0.6047 24,060 14,549 October 1- Chirikof (620). 0.1167 15,175 1,771 November 1. Kodiak (630)... 0.2028 19,529 3,960 Annual.......... WYK (640)...... 0.3495 9,209 3,219 SEO (650)...... 0.3495 9,920 3,467 Pacific cod.................. A Season \1\-- W.............. 0.1331 14,699 1,956 January 1-June C.............. 0.0692 19,175 1,327 10. B Season \2\-- W.............. 0.1331 9,799 1,304 September 1- C.............. 0.0692 12,783 885 December 31. Annual.......... E inshore...... 0.0079 5,124 40 E offshore..... 0.0078 569 4 Sablefish.................... Annual, trawl W.............. 0.0000 233 0 gear. C.............. 0.0642 736 47 E.............. 0.0433 173 8 Flatfish, shallow-water...... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0156 13,250 207 C.............. 0.0587 17,680 1,038 E.............. 0.0126 3,925 49 Flatfish, deep-water......... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0000 187 0 C.............. 0.0647 3,516 227 E.............. 0.0128 5,578 71 Rex sole..................... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0007 1,318 1 C.............. 0.0384 4,453 171 E.............. 0.0029 1,736 5 Arrowtooth flounder.......... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0021 14,500 30 C.............. 0.0280 75,000 2,100 E.............. 0.0002 13,800 3 Flathead sole................ Annual.......... W.............. 0.0036 8,650 31 C.............. 0.0213 15,400 328 E.............. 0.0009 3,800 3 Pacific ocean perch.......... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0023 2,709 6 C.............. 0.0748 16,860 1,261 E.............. 0.0466 4,620 215 Northern rockfish............ Annual.......... W.............. 0.0003 430 0 C.............. 0.0277 3,338 92 Shortraker rockfish.......... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0000 38 0 C.............. 0.0218 301 7 E.............. 0.0110 947 10 Dusky Rockfish............... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0001 159 0 C.............. 0.0000 3,791 0 E.............. 0.0067 334 2 Rougheye rockfish............ Annual.......... W.............. 0.0000 105 0 C.............. 0.0237 705 17 E.............. 0.0124 515 6 Demersal shelf rockfish...... Annual.......... SEO............ 0.0020 231 0 Thornyhead rockfish.......... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0280 291 8 C.............. 0.0280 988 28 E.............. 0.0280 682 19 Other Rockfish............... Annual.......... W/C............ 0.1699 1,534 261 E.............. 0.0000 774 0 Atka mackerel................ Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0309 2,000 62 Big skates................... Annual.......... W.............. 0.0063 908 6 C.............. 0.0063 1,850 12 E.............. 0.0063 1,056 7 Longnose skates.............. Annual.......... W.............. 0.0063 61 0 C.............. 0.0063 2,513 16 [[Page 87896]] E.............. 0.0063 632 4 Other skates................. Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0063 1,919 12 Sculpins..................... Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0063 5,591 35 Sharks....................... Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0063 4,514 28 Squids....................... Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0063 1,148 7 Octopuses.................... Annual.......... Gulfwide....... 0.0063 4,878 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20. \2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1. \3\ The Western and Central GOA area apportionments of pollock are considered ACLs. Non-Exempt AFA Catcher Vessel Halibut PSC Limits The halibut PSC sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA CVs in the GOA are based on the aggregate retained groundfish catch by non-exempt AFA CVs in each PSC target category from 1995 through 1997 divided by the retained catch of all vessels in that fishery from 1995 through 1997 (Sec. 679.64(b)(4)). Table 14 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 non- exempt AFA CV halibut PSC limits for vessels using trawl gear in the GOA. Table 14--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Non-Exempt American Fisheries Act Catcher Vessel Halibut Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) Limits for Vessels Using Trawl Gear in the GOA [PSC limits are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ratio of 1995- 1997 non-exempt Proposed 2017 AFA CV retained Proposed 2017 and 2018 non- Season Season dates Fishery category catch to total and 2018 PSC exempt AFA CV retained catch limit PSC limit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1................... January 20-April shallow-water.... 0.340 384 131 1. deep-water....... 0.070 85 6 2................... April 1-July 1... shallow-water.... 0.340 85 29 deep-water....... 0.070 256 18 3................... July 1-September shallow-water.... 0.340 171 58 1. deep-water....... 0.070 341 24 4................... September 1- shallow-water.... 0.340 128 44 October 1. deep-water....... 0.070 0 0 5................... October 1- all targets...... 0.205 256 52 December 31. ----------------------------------------------------- Annual.......... ................. Total shallow- ................ ................ 262 water. Total deep-water. ................ ................ 48 ----------------------------------------------------- Grand Total, all ................ 1,706 362 seasons and categories. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-AFA Crab Vessel Groundfish Sideboard Limits Section 680.22 establishes groundfish sideboard limits for vessels with a history of participation in the Bering Sea snow crab fishery to prevent these vessels from using the increased flexibility provided by the Crab Rationalization Program to expand their level of participation in the GOA groundfish fisheries. Sideboard harvest limits restrict these vessels' catch to their collective historical landings in each GOA groundfish fishery (except the fixed-gear sablefish fishery). Sideboard limits also apply to landings made using an LLP license derived from the history of a restricted vessel, even if that LLP license is used on another vessel. The basis for these sideboard harvest limits is described in detail in the final rules implementing the major provisions of the Crab Rationalization Program, including Amendments 18 and 19 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (Crab FMP) (70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005), Amendment 34 to the Crab FMP (76 FR 35772, June 20, 2011), Amendment 83 to the GOA FMP (76 FR 74670, December 1, 2011), and Amendment 45 to the Crab FMP (80 FR 28539, May 19, 2015). Table 15 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 groundfish sideboard limitations for non-AFA crab vessels. All targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by non-AFA crab vessels or associated LLP licenses will be deducted from these sideboard limits. [[Page 87897]] Table 15--Proposed 2017 and 2018 GOA Non-American Fisheries Act Crab Vessel Groundfish Sideboard Limits [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ratio of 1996- 2000 non-AFA Proposed 2017 crab vessel Proposed 2017 and 2018 non-AFA Species Season/gear Area/component/gear catch to 1996- and 2018 TACs crab vessel 2000 total sideboard limit harvest -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pollock................................. A Season--January 20-March Shumagin (610)............. 0.0098 3,769 37 10. Chirikof (620)............. 0.0031 42,732 132 Kodiak (630)............... 0.0002 12,272 2 B Season--March 10-May 31.. Shumagin (610)............. 0.0098 3,769 37 Chirikof (620)............. 0.0031 49,996 155 Kodiak (630)............... 0.0002 5,007 1 C Season--August 25-October Shumagin (610)............. 0.0098 24,060 236 1. Chirikof (620)............. 0.0031 15,176 47 Kodiak (630)............... 0.0002 19,529 4 D Season--October 1- Shumagin (610)............. 0.0098 24,060 236 November 1. Chirikof (620)............. 0.0031 15,175 47 Kodiak (630)............... 0.0002 19,529 4 Annual..................... WYK (640).................. 0.0000 9,209 SEO (650).................. 0.0000 9,920 Pacific cod............................. A Season \1\--January 1- W Jig CV................... 0.0000 14,699 ................ June 10. W Hook-and-line CV......... 0.0004 14,699 6 W Pot CV................... 0.0997 14,699 1,466 W Pot C/P.................. 0.0078 14,699 115 W Trawl CV................. 0.0007 14,699 10 C Jig CV................... 0.0000 19,175 ................ C Hook-and-line CV......... 0.0001 19,175 2 C Pot CV................... 0.0474 19,175 909 C Pot C/P.................. 0.0136 19,175 261 C Trawl CV................. 0.0012 19,175 23 B Season \2\--September 1- W Jig CV................... 0.0000 9,799 ................ December 31 W Hook-and-line CV......... 0.0004 9,799 4 W Pot CV................... 0.0997 9,799 977 W Pot C/P.................. 0.0078 9,799 76 W Trawl CV................. 0.0007 9,799 7 C Jig CV................... 0.0000 12,783 ................ C Hook-and-line CV......... 0.0001 12,783 1 C Pot CV................... 0.0474 12,783 606 C Pot C/P.................. 0.0136 12,783 174 C Trawl CV................. 0.0012 12,783 15 Annual..................... E inshore.................. 0.0110 5,124 56 E offshore................. 0.0000 569 ................ Sablefish............................... Annual, trawl gear......... W.......................... 0.0000 233 ................ C.......................... 0.0000 736 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 173 ................ Flatfish, shallow-water................. Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0059 13,250 78 C.......................... 0.0001 17,680 2 E.......................... 0.0000 3,925 ................ Flatfish, deep-water.................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0035 187 1 C.......................... 0.0000 3,516 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 5,578 ................ Rex sole................................ Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0000 1,318 ................ C.......................... 0.0000 4,453 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 1,736 ................ Arrowtooth flounder..................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0004 14,500 6 C.......................... 0.0001 75,000 8 E.......................... 0.0000 13,800 ................ Flathead sole........................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0002 8,650 2 C.......................... 0.0004 15,400 6 E.......................... 0.0000 3,800 ................ Pacific ocean perch..................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0000 2,709 ................ C.......................... 0.0000 16,860 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 4,620 ................ Northern rockfish....................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0005 430 0 C.......................... 0.0000 3,338 ................ Shortraker rockfish..................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0013 38 0 C.......................... 0.0012 301 0 E.......................... 0.0009 947 1 Dusky rockfish.......................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0017 159 0 C.......................... 0.0000 3,791 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 334 ................ Rougheye rockfish....................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0067 105 1 C.......................... 0.0047 705 3 E.......................... 0.0008 515 0 Demersal shelf rockfish................. Annual..................... SEO........................ 0.0000 231 ................ Thornyhead rockfish..................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0047 291 1 C.......................... 0.0066 988 7 E.......................... 0.0045 682 3 Other rockfish.......................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0035 1,534 5 [[Page 87898]] C.......................... 0.0033 774 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 2,000 ................ Atka mackerel........................... Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0000 908 36 Big skate............................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0392 1,850 29 C.......................... 0.0159 1,056 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 61 2 Longnose skate.......................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.0392 2,513 40 C.......................... 0.0159 632 ................ E.......................... 0.0000 1,919 34 Other skates............................ Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0176 5,591 98 Sculpins................................ Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0176 4,514 79 Sharks.................................. Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0176 1,148 20 Squids.................................. Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0176 4,878 86 Octopuses............................... Annual..................... Gulfwide................... 0.0176 38 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20. \2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1. Rockfish Program Groundfish Sideboard and Halibut PSC Limitations The Rockfish Program establishes three classes of sideboard provisions: CV groundfish sideboard restrictions, C/P rockfish sideboard restrictions, and C/P opt-out vessel sideboard restrictions. These sideboards are intended to limit the ability of rockfish harvesters to expand into other fisheries. CVs participating in the Rockfish Program may not participate in directed fishing for dusky rockfish, northern rockfish, and Pacific ocean perch in the Western GOA and West Yakutat Districts from July 1 through July 31. Also, CVs may not participate in directed fishing for arrowtooth flounder, deep-water flatfish, and rex sole in the GOA from July 1 through July 31 (Sec. 679.82(d)). C/Ps participating in Rockfish Program cooperatives are restricted by rockfish and halibut PSC sideboard limits. These C/Ps are prohibited from directed fishing for northern rockfish, Pacific ocean perch, and dusky rockfish in the Western GOA and West Yakutat District from July 1 through July 31. Holders of C/P-designated LLP licenses that opt out of participating in a Rockfish Program cooperative will be able to access those sideboard limits that are not assigned to Rockfish Program cooperatives. Table 16 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 Rockfish Program C/P rockfish sideboard limits in the Western GOA and West Yakutat District. Due to confidentiality requirements associated with fisheries data, the sideboard limits for the West Yakutat District are not displayed. Table 16--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Rockfish Program Sideboard Limits for the Western GOA and West Yakutat District by Fishery for the Catcher/Processor (C/P) Sector [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed 2017 and Area Fishery C/P sector (% of TAC) Proposed 2017 2018 C/P sideboard and 2018 TACs limit ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Western GOA.................. Dusky rockfish.. 72.3.................. 159 115 Pacific ocean 50.6.................. 2,709 1,371 perch. Northern 74.3.................. 430 319 rockfish. West Yakutat District........ Dusky rockfish.. Confidential \1\ 251 Confidential \1\ Pacific ocean Confidential \1\ 2,818 Confidential \1\ perch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Not released due to confidentiality requirements associated with fish ticket data, as established by NMFS and the State of Alaska. Under the Rockfish Program, the C/P sector is subject to halibut PSC sideboard limits for the trawl deep-water and shallow-water species fisheries from July 1 through July 31. No halibut PSC sideboard limits apply to the CV sector, as vessels participating in a rockfish cooperative receive a portion of the annual halibut PSC limit. C/Ps that opt out of the Rockfish Program would be able to access that portion of the deep-water and shallow-water halibut PSC sideboard limit not assigned to C/P rockfish cooperatives. The sideboard provisions for C/Ps that elect to opt out of participating in a rockfish cooperative are described in Sec. 679.82(c), (e), and (f). Sideboard limits are linked to the catch history of specific vessels that may choose to opt out. After March 1, NMFS will determine which C/Ps have opted-out of the Rockfish Program in 2017, and will know the ratios and amounts used to calculate opt-out sideboard ratios. NMFS will then calculate any applicable opt-out sideboard limits and [[Page 87899]] post these limits on the Alaska Region Web site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/rockfish/. Table 17 lists the 2017 and 2018 proposed Rockfish Program halibut PSC limits for the C/P sector. Table 17--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Rockfish Program Halibut Mortality Limits for the Catcher/Processor Sector [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shallow-water Deep-water Annual shallow- Annual deep- species fishery species fishery Annual halibut water species water species Sector halibut PSC halibut PSC mortality limit fishery halibut fishery halibut sideboard ratio sideboard ratio (mt) PSC sideboard PSC sideboard (percent) (percent) limit (mt) limit (mt) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Catcher/processor........................................ 0.10 2.50 1,706 2 43 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amendment 80 Program Groundfish and PSC Sideboard Limits Amendment 80 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (Amendment 80 Program) established a limited access privilege program for the non-AFA trawl C/ P sector. The Amendment 80 Program established groundfish and halibut PSC limits for Amendment 80 Program participants to limit the ability of participants eligible for the Amendment 80 Program to expand their harvest efforts in the GOA. Section 679.92 establishes groundfish harvesting sideboard limits on all Amendment 80 Program vessels, other than the F/V Golden Fleece, to amounts no greater than the limits shown in Table 37 to part 679. Under Sec. 679.92(d), the F/V Golden Fleece is prohibited from directed fishing for pollock, Pacific cod, Pacific ocean perch, dusky rockfish, and northern rockfish in the GOA. Groundfish sideboard limits for Amendment 80 Program vessels operating in the GOA are based on their average aggregate harvests from 1998 through 2004. Table 18 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 sideboard limits for Amendment 80 Program vessels. NMFS will deduct all targeted or incidental catch of sideboard species made by Amendment 80 Program vessels from the sideboard limits in Table 18. Table 18--Proposed 2017 and 2018 GOA Groundfish Sideboard Limits for Amendment 80 Program Vessels [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ratio of Proposed 2017 Amendment 80 Proposed 2017 and 2018 Species Season Area sector vessels and 2018 TAC Amendment 80 1998-2004 catch (mt) vessel sideboard to TAC limits (mt) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pollock................................. A Season--January 20- Shumagin (610)............. 0.003 3,769 11 February 25. Chirikof (620)............. 0.002 42,732 85 Kodiak (630)............... 0.002 12,272 25 B Season--March 10-May 31.. Shumagin (610)............. 0.003 3,769 11 Chirikof (620)............. 0.002 49,996 100 Kodiak (630)............... 0.002 5,007 10 C Season--August 25- Shumagin (610)............. 0.003 24,060 72 September 15. Chirikof (620)............. 0.002 15,176 30 Kodiak (630)............... 0.002 19,529 39 D Season--October 1- Shumagin (610)............. 0.003 24,060 72 November 1. Chirikof (620)............. 0.002 15,175 30 Kodiak (630)............... 0.002 19,529 39 Annual..................... WYK (640).................. 0.002 9,209 18 Pacific cod............................. A Season \1\--January 1- W.......................... 0.020 14,699 294 June 10. C.......................... 0.044 19,175 844 B Season \2\--September 1- W.......................... 0.020 9,799 196 December 31. C.......................... 0.044 12,783 562 Annual..................... WYK........................ 0.034 5,693 194 Pacific ocean perch..................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.994 2,709 2,693 WYK........................ 0.961 2,818 2,708 Northern rockfish....................... Annual..................... W.......................... 1.000 430 430 Dusky rockfish.......................... Annual..................... W.......................... 0.764 159 121 WYK........................ 0.896 251 225 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20. \2\ The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1. The halibut PSC sideboard limits for Amendment 80 Program vessels in the GOA are based on the historic use of halibut PSC by Amendment 80 Program vessels in each PSC target category from 1998 through 2004. These values are slightly lower than the average historic use to accommodate two factors: Allocation of halibut PSC cooperative [[Page 87900]] quota under the Rockfish Program and the exemption of the F/V Golden Fleece from this restriction (Sec. 679.92(b)(2)). Table 19 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 halibut PSC sideboard limits for Amendment 80 Program vessels. These tables incorporate the maximum percentages of the halibut PSC sideboard limits that may be used by Amendment 80 Program vessels, as contained in Table 38 to 50 CFR part 679. Table 19--Proposed 2017 and 2018 Halibut PSC Sideboard Limits for Amendment 80 Program Vessels in the GOA [Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed 2017 Historic and 2018 Amendment 80 use Proposed 2017 Amendment 80 Season Season dates Fishery category of the annual and 2018 annual vessel PSC halibut PSC PSC limit (mt) sideboard limit limit (ratio) (mt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1................... January 20-April shallow-water.... 0.0048 1,706 8 1. deep-water....... 0.0115 1,706 20 2................... April 1-July 1... shallow-water.... 0.0189 1,706 32 deep-water....... 0.1072 1,706 183 3................... July 1-September shallow-water.... 0.0146 1,706 25 1. deep-water....... 0.0521 1,706 89 4................... September 1- shallow-water.... 0.0074 1,706 13 October 1. deep-water....... 0.0014 1,706 2 5................... October 1- shallow-water.... 0.0227 1,706 39 December 31. deep-water....... 0.0371 1,706 63 ----------------------------------------------------- Annual.......... ................. Total shallow- ................ ................ 117 water. Total deep-water. ................ ................ 357 ----------------------------------------------------- Grand Total, all ................ ................ 474 seasons and categories. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Classification NMFS has determined that the proposed harvest specifications are consistent with the FMP and preliminarily determined that the proposed harvest specifications are consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws, subject to further review after public comment. This action is authorized under 50 CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. NMFS prepared an EIS for this action and made it available to the public on January 12, 2007 (72 FR 1512). On February 13, 2007, NMFS issued the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final EIS. A Supplemental Information Report (SIR) that assesses the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS is being prepared for the final action. Copies of the Final EIS, ROD, and SIR for this action are available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The Final EIS analyzes the environmental consequences of the proposed groundfish harvest specifications and alternative harvest strategies on resources in the action area. The Final EIS found no significant environmental consequences from the proposed action or its alternatives. NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), analyzing the methodology for establishing the relevant TACs. The IRFA evaluated the impacts on small entities of alternative harvest strategies for the groundfish fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska. As set forth in the methodology, TACs are set to a level that fall within the range of ABCs recommended by the SSC; the sum of the TACs must achieve the OY specified in the FMP. While the specific numbers that the methodology produces may vary from year to year, the methodology itself remains constant. A description of the proposed action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this proposed action are contained in the preamble above. A copy of the analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA follows. The action under consideration is a harvest strategy to govern the catch of groundfish in the GOA. The preferred alternative is the existing harvest strategy in which TACs fall within the range of ABCs recommended by the SSC. This action is taken in accordance with the FMP prepared by the Council pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The entities directly regulated by this action are those that harvest groundfish in the EEZ of the GOA and in parallel fisheries within State of Alaska waters. These include entities operating CVs and C/Ps within the action area and entities receiving direct allocations of groundfish. For RFA purposes only, NMFS has established a small business size standard for businesses, including their affiliates, whose primary industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business primarily engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411) is classified as a small business if it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates), and has combined annual receipts not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated operations worldwide. The IRFA shows that, in 2015, there were 969 individual CVs with gross revenues less than or equal to $11 million. This estimate accounts for corporate affiliations among vessels, and for cooperative affiliations among fishing entities, since some of the fishing vessels operating in the GOA are members of AFA inshore pollock cooperatives, GOA rockfish cooperatives, or BSAI Crab Rationalization Program cooperatives. Therefore, under the RFA, it is the aggregate gross receipts of all participating members of the cooperative that must meet the ``under $11 million'' threshold. Vessels that participate in these cooperatives are considered to be large entities within the meaning of the RFA. After accounting for membership in these cooperatives, there are an estimated 969 small CV entities remaining in the GOA [[Page 87901]] groundfish sector. This latter group of vessels had average gross revenues that varied by gear type. Average gross revenues for hook-and- line CVs, pot gear vessels, and trawl gear vessels are estimated to be $350,000, $760,000, and $1.85 million, respectively. Revenue data for the three C/Ps considered to be small entities are confidential. There are three C/Ps that are considered to be small entities; however, their revenue data is confidential. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) was compared to four other alternatives. Alternative 1 would have set TACs to generate fishing rates equal to the maximum permissible ABC (if the full TAC were harvested), unless the sum of TACs exceeded the GOA OY, in which case TACs would be limited to the OY. Alternative 3 would have set TACs to produce fishing rates equal to the most recent 5-year average fishing rate. Alternative 4 would have set TACs to equal the lower limit of the GOA OY range. Alternative 5, the ``no action alternative,'' would have set TACs equal to zero. The TACs associated with the preferred harvest strategy are those adopted by the Council in October 2016, as per Alternative 2. OFLs and ABCs for the species were based on recommendations prepared by the Council's GOA Plan Team in September 2016, and reviewed by the Council's SSC in October 2016. The Council based its TAC recommendations on those of its AP, which were consistent with the SSC's OFL and ABC recommendations. Alternative 1 selects harvest rates that would allow fishermen to harvest stocks at the level of ABCs, unless total harvests were constrained by the upper bound of the GOA OY of 800,000 mt. As shown in Table 1 of the preamble, the sum of ABCs in 2017 and 2018 would be 708,629 mt, which falls below the upper bound of the OY range. The sum of TACs is 573,872 mt, which is less than the sum of ABCs. In this instance, Alternative 1 is consistent with the preferred alternative (Alternative 2), meets the objectives of that action, and has small entity impacts that are equivalent to the preferred alternative. In some instances, the selection of Alternative 1 would not reflect the practical implications that increased TACs (where the sum of TACs equals the sum of ABCs) for some species probably would not be fully harvested. This could be due to a lack of commercial or market interest in such species. Additionally, an underharvest of some TACs could result due to constraints such as the fixed, and therefore constraining, PSC limits associated with the harvest of the GOA groundfish species. Alternative 3 selects harvest rates based on the most recent 5 years of harvest rates (for species in Tiers 1 through 3) or for the most recent 5 years of harvests (for species in Tiers 4 through 6). This alternative is inconsistent with the objectives of this action, the Council's preferred harvest strategy, because it does not take account of the most recent biological information for this fishery. NMFS annually conducts at-sea stock surveys for different species, as well as statistical modeling, to estimate stock sizes and permissible harvest levels. Actual harvest rates or harvest amounts are a component of these estimates, but in and of themselves may not accurately portray stock sizes and conditions. Harvest rates are listed for each species category for each year in the SAFE report (see ADDRESSES). Alternative 4 would lead to significantly lower harvests of all species and reduce the TACs from the upper end of the OY range in the GOA, to its lower end of 116,000 mt. Overall, this would reduce 2017 TACs by about 80 percent and would lead to significant reductions in harvests of species harvested by small entities. While reductions of this size would be associated with offsetting price increases, the size of these increases is very uncertain. There are close substitutes for GOA groundfish species available in significant quantities from the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area. While production declines in the GOA would undoubtedly be associated with significant price increases in the GOA, these increases would still be constrained by production of substitutes, and are very unlikely to offset revenue declines from smaller production. Thus, this alternative would have a detrimental impact on small entities. Alternative 5, which sets all harvests equal to zero, would have a significant adverse economic impact on small entities and would be contrary to obligations to achieve OY on a continuing basis, as mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Under Alternative 5, all 969 individual CVs impacted by this rule would have gross revenues of $0. Additionally, the three small C/Ps impacted by this rule also would have gross revenues of $0. The proposed harvest specifications (Alternative 2) extend the current 2017 OFLs, ABCs, and TACs to 2017 and 2018. As noted in the IRFA, the Council may modify these OFLs, ABCs, and TACs in December 2016, when it reviews the November 2016 SAFE report from its Groundfish Plan Team, and the December 2016 Council meeting reports of its SSC and AP. Because the 2017 TACs in the proposed 2017 and 2018 harvest specifications are unchanged from the 2017 TACs, NMFS does not expect adverse impacts on small entities. Also, NMFS does not expect any changes made by the Council in December 2016 to have significant adverse impacts on small entities. This action does not modify recordkeeping or reporting requirements, or duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any Federal rules. Adverse impacts on marine mammals or endangered species resulting from fishing activities conducted under this rule are discussed in the Final EIS and its accompanying annual SIRs (see ADDRESSES). Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1540(f); 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 105-277; Pub. L. 106- 31; Pub. L. 106-554; Pub. L. 108-199; Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 109- 241; Pub. L. 109-479. Dated: November 30, 2016. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2016-29150 Filed 12-5-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87881
This action does not modify NMFS–2016–0127, by any one of the 1801, et seq. Regulations governing U.S.
recordkeeping or reporting following methods: fisheries and implementing the FMP
requirements, or duplicate, overlap, or • Electronic Submission: Submit all appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and
conflict with any Federal rules. electronic public comments via the 680.
Adverse impacts on marine mammals Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to The FMP and its implementing
resulting from fishing activities www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= regulations require NMFS, after
conducted under these harvest NOAA-NMFS-2016-0127, click the consultation with the Council, to
specifications are discussed in the Final ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the specify the total allowable catch (TAC)
EIS (see ADDRESSES), and in the 2016 required fields, and enter or attach your for each target species, the sum of which
SIR (https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/ comments. must be within the optimum yield (OY)
sites/default/files/sir-2016-17.pdf). • Mail: Submit written comments to range of 116,000 to 800,000 metric tons
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional (mt) (§ 679.20(a)(1)(i)(B)). Section
1540(f); 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries 679.20(c)(1) further requires NMFS to
3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 105–277; Pub. L. 106– Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: publish and solicit public comment on
31; Pub. L. 106–554; Pub. L. 108–199; Pub. Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. proposed annual TACs, Pacific halibut
L. 108–447; Pub. L. 109–241; Pub. L. 109– Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668. prohibited species catch (PSC) limits,
479. Instructions: Comments sent by any and seasonal allowances of pollock and
Dated: November 30, 2016. other method, to any other address or Pacific cod. The proposed harvest
Samuel D. Rauch III, individual, or received after the end of specifications in Tables 1 through 19 of
Deputy Assistant Administrator for the comment period, may not be this document satisfy these
Regulatory Programs, National Marine considered by NMFS. All comments requirements. For 2017 and 2018, the
Fisheries Service. received are a part of the public record sum of the proposed TAC amounts is
[FR Doc. 2016–29152 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am] and will generally be posted for public 573,872 mt.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P viewing on www.regulations.gov Under § 679.20(c)(3), NMFS will
without change. All personal identifying publish the final 2017 and 2018 harvest
information (e.g., name, address), specifications after (1) considering
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE confidential business information, or comments received within the comment
otherwise sensitive information period (see DATES), (2) consulting with
National Oceanic and Atmospheric submitted voluntarily by the sender will the Council at its December 2016
Administration be publicly accessible. NMFS will meeting, (3) considering information
accept anonymous comments (enter presented in the 2016 SIR that assesses
50 CFR Part 679 ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS
[Docket No. 160920866–6999–01] to remain anonymous). (see ADDRESSES), and (4) considering
Electronic copies of the Alaska information presented in the final 2016
RIN 0648–XE904 Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final SAFE report prepared for the 2017 and
Environmental Impact Statement (Final 2018 groundfish fisheries.
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic EIS), Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; 2017 Final EIS, Supplementary Information Other Actions Potentially Affecting the
and 2018 Harvest Specifications for Report (SIR) to the Final EIS, and the 2017 and 2018 Harvest Specifications
Groundfish Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Amendment 103: Chinook Salmon
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (IRFA) prepared for this action may be Prohibited Species Catch Limit
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and obtained from http:// Reapportionment Provisions for Trawl
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska Sectors in the Western and Central GOA
Commerce. Region Web site at https://alaska
In December 2015, the Council
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for fisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2015 Stock
recommended for Secretarial review
comments. Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
Amendment 103 to the FMP to
(SAFE) report for the groundfish
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2017 and reapportion unused Chinook salmon
resources of the GOA, dated November
2018 harvest specifications, PSC limits among the GOA pollock and
2015, is available from the North Pacific
apportionments, and Pacific halibut non-pollock trawl sectors. Amendment
Fishery Management Council (Council)
prohibited species catch limits for the 103 allows NMFS to reapportion the
at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite 306,
groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska Chinook salmon PSC limits established
Anchorage, AK 99501, phone 907–271–
(GOA). This action is necessary to by Amendments 93 and 97 to prevent or
2809, or from the Council’s Web site at
establish harvest limits for groundfish limit fishery closures due to attainment
http://www.npfmc.org. The draft 2016
during the 2017 and 2018 fishing years of sector-specific Chinook salmon PSC
SAFE report for the GOA will be
and to accomplish the goals and limits, while maintaining the annual,
available from the same source.
objectives of the Fishery Management combined 32,500 Chinook salmon PSC
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: limit for all sectors. The Secretary
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Obren Davis, 907–586–7228.
Alaska. The intended effect of this approved Amendment 103 on August
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 24, 2016. The final rule implementing
action is to conserve and manage the manages the GOA groundfish fisheries Amendment 103 published on
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
groundfish resources in the GOA in in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens September 12, 2016, (81 FR 62659) and
the GOA under the Fishery Management became effective on October 12, 2016.
Fishery Conservation and Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Act. Alaska (FMP). The Council prepared the Amendment 101: Authorize Longline
DATES: Comments must be received by FMP under the authority of the Pot Gear for Use in the Sablefish IFQ
January 5, 2017. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Fishery in the GOA
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Conservation and Management Act NMFS issued a proposed rule to
on this document, identified by NOAA– (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. implement Amendment 101 to the FMP
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87883
The ABC for the pollock stock in the regulations govern the apportionment of sectors. Table 3 lists the amounts
combined Western, Central, and West pollock, Pacific cod, and sablefish. apportioned to each sector.
Yakutat Regulatory Areas (W/C/WYK) Additional detail on these The Council’s recommendation for
includes the amount for the GHL apportionments are described below, sablefish area apportionments takes into
established by the State for the PWS and briefly summarized here. account the prohibition on the use of
pollock fishery. The Plan Team, SSC, NMFS proposes pollock TACs in the
W/C/WYK and the SEO District of the trawl gear in the SEO District of the
AP, and Council recommended that the
GOA (see Table 1). NMFS also proposes Eastern Regulatory Area and makes
sum of all State and Federal water
pollock removals from the GOA not seasonal apportionment of the annual available 5 percent of the combined
exceed ABC recommendations. For 2017 pollock TAC in the Western and Central Eastern Regulatory Area ABCs to trawl
and 2018, the SSC recommended and Regulatory Areas of the GOA among gear for use as incidental catch in other
the Council approved the W/C/WYK Statistical Areas 610, 620, and 630. groundfish fisheries in the WYK District
pollock ABC, including the amount to These apportionments are divided (§ 679.20(a)(4)(i)). Additional detail is
account for the State’s PWS GHL. At the equally among each of the following provided below; Tables 4 and 5 list
November 2016 Plan Team meeting, four seasons: The A season (January 20 these amounts.
State fisheries managers recommended through March 10), the B season (March For 2017 and 2018, the Council
setting the PWS GHL at 2.5 percent of 10 through May 31), the C season recommends and NMFS proposes the
the annual W/C/WYK pollock ABC. For (August 25 through October 1), and the OFLs, ABCs, and TACs listed in Table
2017, this yields a PWS pollock GHL of D season (October 1 through November 1. The proposed ABCs reflect harvest
6,264 mt, a slight decrease from the 1) (§ 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), and amounts that are less than the specified
2016 PWS GHL of 6,358 mt. The § 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A) and (B)). Additional overfishing levels. Table 1 lists the
proposed W/C/WYK 2017 and 2018 detail is provided below; Table 2 lists proposed 2017 and 2018 OFLs, ABCs,
pollock ABC is 250,544 mt, and the these amounts. TACs, and area apportionments of
proposed TAC is 244,280 mt. NMFS proposes Pacific cod TACs in
groundfish in the GOA. These amounts
Apportionments of pollock to the W/ the Western, Central, and Eastern GOA
are consistent with the biological
C/WYK management areas are (see Table 1). NMFS also proposes
condition of groundfish stocks as
considered to be ‘‘apportionments of seasonal apportionment of the Pacific
cod TACs in the Western and Central described in the 2015 SAFE report, and
annual catch limit (ACLs)’’ rather than
Regulatory Areas. Sixty percent of the adjusted for other biological and
‘‘ABCs.’’ This more accurately reflects
that such apportionments address annual TAC is apportioned to the A socioeconomic considerations,
management, rather than biological or season for hook-and-line, pot, or jig gear including maintaining the total TAC
conservation, concerns. In addition, from January 1 through June 10, and for within the required OY range. The sum
apportioning ACLs in this manner allow trawl gear from January 20 through June of the proposed TACs for all GOA
NMFS to balance any transfer of TAC 10. Forty percent of the annual TAC is groundfish is 573,872 mt for 2017 and
from one area to another pursuant to apportioned to the B season for jig gear 2018, which is within the OY range
§ 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B) to ensure that the from June 10 through December 31, for specified by the FMP. These proposed
area-wide ACL and ABC are not hook-and-line or pot gear from amounts and apportionments by area,
exceeded. September 1 through December 31, and season, and sector are subject to change
NMFS’ proposed apportionments for for trawl gear from September 1 through pending consideration of the draft 2016
groundfish species are based on the November 1 (§§ 679.23(d)(3) and SAFE report and the Council’s
distribution of biomass among the 679.20(a)(12)). The Western and Central recommendations for the final 2017 and
regulatory areas under which NMFS GOA Pacific cod TACs are allocated 2018 harvest specifications during its
manages the species. Additional among various gear and operational December 2016 meeting.
TABLE 1—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ABCS, TACS, AND OFLS OF GROUNDFISH FOR THE WESTERN/CENTRAL/WEST
YAKUTAT, WESTERN, CENTRAL, AND EASTERN REGULATORY AREAS, AND IN THE WEST YAKUTAT, SOUTHEAST OUT-
SIDE, AND GULFWIDE DISTRICTS OF THE GULF OF ALASKA
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Species Area 1 OFL ABC TAC 2
Pollock 2 ................................................................................... Shumagin (610) ..................... n/a 55,657 55,657
Chirikof (620) ......................... n/a 123,078 123,078
Kodiak (630) .......................... n/a 56,336 56,336
WYK (640) ............................. n/a 9,209 9,209
W/C/WYK (subtotal) ............... 289,937 250,544 244,280
SEO (650) .............................. 13,226 9,920 9,920
Total ................................ 303,163 260,464 254,200
Pacific cod 3 ............................................................................. W ............................................ n/a 34,998 24,499
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
C ............................................ n/a 42,610 31,958
E ............................................. n/a 7,592 5,693
Total ................................ 100,800 85,200 62,150
Sablefish 4 ................................................................................ W ............................................ n/a 1,163 1,163
C ............................................ n/a 3,678 3,678
WYK ....................................... n/a 1,348 1,348
SEO ....................................... n/a 2,118 2,118
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/3.svg)
![87884 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ABCS, TACS, AND OFLS OF GROUNDFISH FOR THE WESTERN/CENTRAL/WEST
YAKUTAT, WESTERN, CENTRAL, AND EASTERN REGULATORY AREAS, AND IN THE WEST YAKUTAT, SOUTHEAST OUT-
SIDE, AND GULFWIDE DISTRICTS OF THE GULF OF ALASKA—Continued
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Species Area 1 OFL ABC TAC 2
E (WYK and SEO) (subtotal) n/a 3,466 3,466
Total ................................ 9,825 8,307 8,307
Shallow-water flatfish 5 ............................................................ W ............................................ n/a 19,159 13,250
C ............................................ n/a 17,680 17,680
WYK ....................................... n/a 2,919 2,919
SEO ....................................... n/a 1,006 1,006
Total ................................ 50,220 40,764 34,855
Deep-water flatfish 6 ................................................................ W ............................................ n/a 187 187
C ............................................ n/a 3,516 3,516
WYK ....................................... n/a 3,015 3,015
SEO ....................................... n/a 2,563 2,563
Total ................................ 11,168 9,281 9,281
Rex sole .................................................................................. W ............................................ n/a 1,318 1,318
C ............................................ n/a 4,453 4,453
WYK ....................................... n/a 767 767
SEO ....................................... n/a 969 969
Total ................................ 9,810 7,507 7,507
Arrowtooth flounder ................................................................. W ............................................ n/a 28,659 14,500
C ............................................ n/a 109,804 75,000
WYK ....................................... n/a 37,999 6,900
SEO ....................................... n/a 12,870 6,900
Total ................................ 196,714 189,332 103,300
Flathead sole ........................................................................... W ............................................ n/a 11,080 8,650
C ............................................ n/a 20,307 15,400
WYK ....................................... n/a 2,944 2,944
SEO ....................................... n/a 856 856
Total ................................ 43,060 35,187 27,850
Pacific ocean perch 7 ............................................................... W ............................................ n/a 2,709 2,709
C ............................................ n/a 16,860 16,860
WYK ....................................... n/a 2,818 2,818
W/C/WYK ............................... 26,045 22,387 22,387
SEO ....................................... 2,096 1,802 1,802
Total ................................ 28,141 24,189 24,189
Northern rockfish 8 ................................................................... W ............................................ n/a 430 430
C ............................................ n/a 3,338 3,338
E ............................................. n/a 4 ........................
Total ................................ 4,501 3,768 3,768
Shortraker rockfish 9 ................................................................ W ............................................ n/a 38 38
C ............................................ n/a 301 301
E ............................................. n/a 947 947
Total ................................ 1,715 1,286 1,286
Dusky rockfish 10 ..................................................................... W ............................................ n/a 159 159
C ............................................ n/a 3,791 3,791
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
WYK ....................................... n/a 251 251
SEO ....................................... n/a 83 83
Total ................................ 5,253 4,284 4,284
Rougheye and blackspotted rockfish 11 .................................. W ............................................ n/a 105 105
C ............................................ n/a 705 705
E ............................................. n/a 515 515
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87885
TABLE 1—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ABCS, TACS, AND OFLS OF GROUNDFISH FOR THE WESTERN/CENTRAL/WEST
YAKUTAT, WESTERN, CENTRAL, AND EASTERN REGULATORY AREAS, AND IN THE WEST YAKUTAT, SOUTHEAST OUT-
SIDE, AND GULFWIDE DISTRICTS OF THE GULF OF ALASKA—Continued
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Species Area 1 OFL ABC TAC 2
Total ................................ 1,592 1,325 1,325
Demersal shelf rockfish 12 ....................................................... SEO ....................................... 364 231 231
Thornyhead rockfish 13 ............................................................ W ............................................ n/a 291 291
C ............................................ n/a 988 988
E ............................................. n/a 682 682
Total ................................ 2,615 1,961 1,961
Other rockfish 14 15 ................................................................... W/C combined ....................... n/a 1,534 1,534
WYK ....................................... n/a 574 574
SEO ....................................... n/a 3,665 200
Total ................................ 7,424 5,773 2,308
Atka mackerel .......................................................................... GW ......................................... 6,200 4,700 2,000
Big skates 16 ............................................................................ W ............................................ n/a 908 908
C ............................................ n/a 1,850 1,850
E ............................................. n/a 1,056 1,056
Total ................................ 5,086 3,814 3,814
Longnose skates 17 ................................................................. W ............................................ n/a 61 61
C ............................................ n/a 2,513 2,513
E ............................................. n/a 632 632
Total ................................ 4,274 3,206 3,206
Other skates 18 ........................................................................ GW ......................................... 2,558 1,919 1,919
Sculpins ................................................................................... GW ......................................... 7,338 5,591 5,591
Sharks ..................................................................................... GW ......................................... 6,020 4,514 4,514
Squids ...................................................................................... GW ......................................... 1,530 1,148 1,148
Octopuses ............................................................................... GW ......................................... 6,504 4,878 4,878
Total ................................................................................. ................................................ 815,875 708,629 573,872
1 Regulatory areas and districts are defined at § 679.2. (W = Western Gulf of Alaska; C = Central Gulf of Alaska; E = Eastern Gulf of Alaska;
WYK = West Yakutat District; SEO = Southeast Outside District; GW = Gulf-wide).
2 The combined pollock ABC for the Western, Central, and West Yakutat areas is apportioned in the Western/Central Regulatory Areas among
four statistical areas. These apportionments are considered subarea ACLs, rather than ABCs, for specification and reapportionment purposes.
Table 2 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018 seasonal apportionments. In the West Yakutat and Southeast Outside Districts of the Eastern Regu-
latory Area, pollock is not divided into seasonal allowances.
3 Section 679.20(a)(12)(i) requires the allocation of the Pacific cod TACs in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA among gear
and operational sectors. The annual Pacific cod TAC is apportioned among various sectors, 60 percent to the A season and 40 percent to the B
season in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA. In the Eastern Regulatory Area of the GOA, Pacific cod is allocated 90 percent
for processing by the inshore component and 10 percent for processing by the offshore component. Table 3 lists the proposed 2017 and 2018
Pacific cod seasonal apportionments.
4 Sablefish is allocated to hook-and-line and trawl gear in 2017 and trawl gear in 2018. Tables 4 and 5 list the proposed 2017 and 2018 alloca-
tions of sablefish TACs.
5 ‘‘Shallow-water flatfish’’ means flatfish not including ‘‘deep-water flatfish,’’ flathead sole, rex sole, or arrowtooth flounder.
6 ‘‘Deep-water flatfish’’ means Dover sole, Greenland turbot, Kamchatka flounder, and deep-sea sole.
7 ‘‘Pacific ocean perch’’ means Sebastes alutus.
8 ‘‘Northern rockfish’’ means Sebastes polyspinous. For management purposes the 3 mt apportionment of ABC to the WYK District of the East-
ern Gulf of Alaska has been included in the other rockfish (slope rockfish) species group.
9 ‘‘Shortraker rockfish’’ means Sebastes borealis.
10 ‘‘Dusky rockfish’’ means Sebastes variabilis.
11 ‘‘Rougheye rockfish’’ means Sebastes aleutianus (rougheye) and Sebastes melanostictus (blackspotted).
12 ‘‘Demersal shelf rockfish’’ means Sebastes pinniger (canary), S. nebulosus (china), S. caurinus (copper), S. maliger (quillback), S.
helvomaculatus (rosethorn), S. nigrocinctus (tiger), and S. ruberrimus (yelloweye).
13 ‘‘Thornyhead rockfish’’ means Sebastes species.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
14 ‘‘Other rockfish (slope rockfish)’’ means Sebastes aurora (aurora), S. melanostomus (blackgill), S. paucispinis (bocaccio), S. goodei
(chilipepper), S. crameri (darkblotch), S. elongatus (greenstriped), S. variegatus (harlequin), S. wilsoni (pygmy), S. babcocki (redbanded), S.
proriger (redstripe), S. zacentrus (sharpchin), S. jordani (shortbelly), S. brevispinis (silvergray), S. diploproa (splitnose), S. saxicola (stripetail), S.
miniatus (vermilion), S. reedi (yellowmouth), S. entomelas (widow), and S. flavidus (yellowtail). In the Eastern GOA only, ‘‘other rockfish’’ also in-
cludes northern rockfish (S. polyspinous).
15 ‘‘Other rockfish’’ in the Western and Central Regulatory Areas and in the West Yakutat District means all rockfish species included in the
‘‘other rockfish’’ and demersal shelf rockfish categories.
16 ‘‘Big skates’’ means Raja binoculata.
17 ‘‘Longnose skates’’ means Raja rhina.
18 ‘‘Other skates’’ means Bathyraja and Raja spp.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/5.svg)
![87886 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Proposed Apportionment of Reserves Pollock TACs in the Western and added to, or subtracted from,
Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA are subsequent seasonal allowances in a
Section 679.20(b)(2) requires NMFS to apportioned among Statistical Areas manner to be determined by the
set aside 20 percent of each TAC for 610, 620, and 630, pursuant to Regional Administrator
pollock, Pacific cod, flatfish, sculpins, § 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(A). In the A and B (§ 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)). The rollover
sharks, squids, and octopuses in seasons, the apportionments have amount is limited to 20 percent of the
reserves for possible apportionment at a historically been based on the unharvested seasonal apportionment for
later date during the fishing year. In proportional distribution of pollock the statistical area. Any unharvested
2016, NMFS reapportioned all of the biomass based on the four most recent pollock above the 20-percent limit could
reserves in the final harvest NMFS winter surveys. In the C and D be further distributed to the other
specifications. For 2017 and 2018, seasons, the apportionments are in statistical areas, in proportion to the
NMFS proposes reapportionment of proportion to the distribution of pollock estimated biomass in the subsequent
each of the reserves for pollock, Pacific biomass based on the four most recent season in those statistical areas
cod, flatfish, sculpins, sharks, squids, NMFS summer surveys. For 2017 and (§ 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B)). The proposed
and octopuses back into the original 2018, the Council recommends, and 2017 and 2018 pollock TACs in the
TAC from which the reserve was NMFS proposes, following the WYK District of 9,209 mt and SEO
derived. NMFS anticipates, based on methodology used for the 2016 and District of 9,920 mt are not allocated by
recent harvest patterns, that such 2017 harvest specifications. This season.
reserves are not necessary and the entire methodology averages the winter and Section 679.20(a)(6)(i) requires the
TAC for each of these species will be summer distribution of pollock in the allocation of 100 percent of the pollock
caught. The TACs in Table 1 reflect this Central Regulatory Area for the A season apportionments in all regulatory areas
proposed reapportionment of reserve instead of using the distribution based and all seasonal allowances to vessels
amounts for these species and species on only the winter surveys. The average catching pollock for processing by the
groups, i.e., each proposed TAC for the is intended to reflect the best available inshore component after subtraction of
above mentioned species categories information about migration patterns, pollock amounts projected by the
contains the full TAC recommended by distribution of pollock, and the Regional Administrator to be caught by,
the Council. performance of the fishery in the area or delivered to, the offshore component
Proposed Apportionments of Pollock during the A season. For the A season, incidental to directed fishing for other
TAC Among Seasons and Regulatory the apportionment is based on the groundfish species. Thus, the amount of
Areas, and Allocations for Processing by proposed adjusted estimate of the pollock available for harvest by vessels
Inshore and Offshore Components relative distribution of pollock biomass harvesting pollock for processing by the
of approximately 6 percent, 73 percent, offshore component is that amount that
In the GOA, pollock is apportioned by and 21 percent in Statistical Areas 610, will be taken as incidental catch during
season and area, and is further allocated 620, and 630, respectively. For the B directed fishing for groundfish species
for processing by inshore and offshore season, the apportionment is based on other than pollock, up to the maximum
components. Pursuant to the relative distribution of pollock retainable amounts allowed under
§ 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B), the annual pollock biomass of approximately 6 percent, 85 § 679.20(e) and (f). At this time, these
TAC specified for the Western and percent, and 9 percent in Statistical incidental catch amounts of pollock are
Central Regulatory Areas of the GOA is Areas 610, 620, and 630, respectively. unknown and will be determined as
apportioned into four equal seasonal For the C and D seasons, the fishing activity occurs during the fishing
allowances of 25 percent. As established apportionment is based on the relative year by the offshore component.
by § 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, distribution of pollock biomass of Table 2 lists the proposed 2017 and
B, C, and D season allowances are approximately 41 percent, 26 percent, 2018 seasonal biomass distribution of
available from January 20 through and 33 percent in Statistical Areas 610, pollock in the Western and Central
March 10, March 10 through May 31, 620, and 630, respectively. Regulatory Areas, area apportionments,
August 25 through October 1, and Within any fishing year, the amount and seasonal allowances. The amounts
October 1 through November 1, by which a seasonal allowance is of pollock for processing by the inshore
respectively. underharvested or overharvested may be and offshore components are not shown.
TABLE 2—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 DISTRIBUTION OF POLLOCK IN THE CENTRAL AND WESTERN REGULATORY AREAS
OF THE GULF OF ALASKA; SEASONAL BIOMASS DISTRIBUTION, AREA APPORTIONMENTS; AND SEASONAL ALLOWANCES
OF ANNUAL TAC 1
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Season 2 Shumagin (Area 610) Chirikof (Area 620) Kodiak (Area 630) Total 3
A (Jan 20–Mar 10) ....... 3,769 (6.41%) 42,732 (72.71%) 12,272 (20.88%) 58,768
B (Mar 10–May 31) ...... 3,769 (6.41%) 49,996 (85.07%) 5,007 (8.52%) 58,768
C (Aug 25–Oct 1) ......... 24,060 (40.94%) 15,176 (25.82%) 19,529 (33.23%) 58,768
D (Oct 1–Nov 1) ........... 24,060 (40.94%) 15,175 (25.82%) 19,529 (33.23%) 58,768
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual Total .......... 55,657 ........................ 123,078 ........................ 56,336 ........................ 235,071
1 Areaapportionments and seasonal allowances may not total precisely due to rounding.
2 Asestablished by § 679.23(d)(2)(i) through (iv), the A, B, C, and D season allowances are available from January 20 through March 10,
March 10 through May 31, August 25 through October 1, and October 1 through November 1, respectively. The amounts of pollock for proc-
essing by the inshore and offshore components are not shown in this table.
3 The West Yakutat and Southeast Outside District pollock TACs are not allocated by season and are not included in the total pollock TACs
shown in this table.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/6.svg)
![87888 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 SEASONAL APPORTIONMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS OF PACIFIC COD TOTAL ALLOW-
ABLE CATCH AMOUNTS IN THE GOA; ALLOCATIONS IN THE WESTERN GOA AND CENTRAL GOA SECTORS, AND THE
EASTERN GOA FOR PROCESSING BY THE INSHORE AND OFFSHORE COMPONENTS
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
A season B season
Annual Sector Sector
Regulatory area and sector allocation percentage of Seasonal percentage of Seasonal
(mt) annual allowances annual allowances
non-jig (mt) non-jig (mt)
TAC TAC
Western GOA:
Jig (3.5% of TAC) ......................................................... 857 N/A 514 N/A 343
Hook-and-line CV ......................................................... 331 0.70 165 0.70 165
Hook-and-line C/P ........................................................ 4,681 10.90 2,577 8.90 2,104
Trawl CV ....................................................................... 9,078 27.70 6,549 10.70 2,530
Trawl C/P ...................................................................... 567 0.90 213 1.50 355
Pot CV and Pot C/P ..................................................... 8,984 19.80 4,681 18.20 4,303
Total ....................................................................... 24,499 60.00 14,699 40.00 9,799
Central GOA:
Jig (1.0% of TAC) ......................................................... 320 N/A 192 N/A 128
Hook-and-line <50 CV .................................................. 4,620 9.32 2,947 5.29 1,673
Hook-and-line ≥50 CV .................................................. 2,122 5.61 1,775 1.10 347
Hook-and-line C/P ........................................................ 1,615 4.11 1,299 1.00 316
Trawl CV 1 ..................................................................... 13,156 21.13 6,687 20.45 6,470
Trawl C/P ...................................................................... 1,328 2.00 634 2.19 694
Pot CV and Pot C/P ..................................................... 8,797 17.83 5,641 9.97 3,156
Total ....................................................................... 31,958 60.00 19,175 40.00 12,783
Eastern GOA: ........................ Inshore (90% of Annual TAC) Offshore (10% of Annual TAC)
5,693 5,124 569
1 Trawlvessels participating in Rockfish Program cooperatives receive 3.81 percent, or 1,409 mt, of the annual Central GOA TAC (see Table
28c to 50 CFR part 679), which is deducted from the Trawl CV B season allowance (see Table 8).
Proposed Allocations of the Sablefish making the remainder of the WYK so that retention of incidental catch of
TACs Amounts to Vessels Using Hook- sablefish TAC available to vessels using sablefish by trawl gear could commence
and-Line and Trawl Gear hook-and-line gear. NMFS proposes to in January in the second year of the
Sections 679.20(a)(4)(i) and (ii) allocate 100 percent of the sablefish groundfish harvest specifications. Since
require allocations of sablefish TACs for TAC in the SEO District to vessels using there is an annual assessment for
each of the regulatory areas and districts hook-and-line gear. This action results sablefish and the final harvest
to hook-and-line and trawl gear. In the in a proposed 2017 allocation of 173 mt specifications are expected to be
Western and Central Regulatory Areas, to trawl gear and 1,175 mt to hook-and- published before the IFQ season begins
80 percent of each TAC is allocated to line gear in the WYK District, a 2,118 mt (typically, in early March), the Council
hook-and-line gear, and 20 percent of to hook-and-line gear in the SEO recommended that the sablefish TAC be
each TAC is allocated to trawl gear. In District, and a 2018 allocation of 173 mt set annually, rather than for 2 years, so
the Eastern Regulatory Area, 95 percent to trawl gear in the WYK District. Table that the best available scientific
of the TAC is allocated to hook-and-line 4 lists the allocations of the proposed information could be considered in
gear and 5 percent is allocated to trawl 2017 sablefish TACs to hook-and-line establishing the ABCs and TACs. With
gear. The trawl gear allocation in the and trawl gear. Table 5 lists the the exception of the trawl allocations
Eastern GOA may only be used to allocations of the proposed 2018 that are provided to the Rockfish
support incidental catch of sablefish in sablefish TACs to trawl gear. Program cooperatives (see Table 28c to
directed fisheries for other target species The Council recommended that the part 679), directed fishing for sablefish
(§ 679.20(a)(4)(i)). hook-and-line sablefish TAC be with trawl gear is closed during the
In recognition of the prohibition established annually to ensure that the fishing year. Also, fishing for groundfish
against trawl gear in the SEO District of sablefish IFQ fishery is conducted with trawl gear is prohibited prior to
the Eastern Regulatory Area, the Council concurrently with the halibut IFQ January 20. Therefore, it is not likely
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
recommended and NMFS proposes the fishery and is based on recent survey that the sablefish allocation to trawl gear
allocation of 5 percent of the combined information. The Council also would be reached before the effective
Eastern Regulatory Area sablefish TAC recommended that only the trawl date of the final 2017 and 2018 harvest
to trawl gear in the WYK District, sablefish TAC be established for 2 years specifications.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/8.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87889
TABLE 4—PROPOSED 2017 SABLEFISH TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC) IN THE GULF OF ALASKA AND ALLOCATIONS TO
HOOK-AND-LINE AND TRAWL GEAR
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Hook-and-line
Area/district TAC Trawl allocation
allocation
Western ............................................................................................................................ 1,163 930 233
Central 1 ........................................................................................................................... 3,678 2,942 736
West Yakutat 2 ................................................................................................................. 1,348 1,175 173
Southeast Outside ........................................................................................................... 2,118 2,118 0
Total .......................................................................................................................... 8,307 7,166 1,142
1 The trawl allocation to the Central Regulatory Area is further reduced by the sablefish apportioned to the Rockfish Program cooperatives (378
mt). See Table 8. This results in 358 mt being available for the non-Rockfish Program trawl fisheries.
2 The proposed trawl allocation is based on allocating 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area (West Yakutat and Southeast Out-
side Districts combined) sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the West Yakutat District.
TABLE 5—PROPOSED 2018 SABLEFISH TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH (TAC) IN THE GULF OF ALASKA AND ALLOCATION TO
TRAWL GEAR 1
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Hook-and-line
Area/district TAC Trawl allocation
allocation
Western ............................................................................................................................ 1,163 n/a 233
Central 2 ........................................................................................................................... 3,678 n/a 736
West Yakutat 3 ................................................................................................................. 1,348 n/a 173
Southeast Outside ........................................................................................................... 2,118 n/a 0
Total .......................................................................................................................... 8,307 n/a 1,142
1 The trawl allocation to the Central Regulatory Area is further reduced by the sablefish apportioned to the Rockfish Program cooperatives (378
mt). See Table 8. This results in 358 mt being available for the non-Rockfish Program trawl fisheries.
2 The Council recommended that harvest specifications for the hook-and-line gear sablefish Individual Fishing Quota fisheries be limited to 1
year.
3 The proposed trawl allocation is based on allocating 5 percent of the combined Eastern Regulatory Area (West Yakutat and Southeast Out-
side Districts combined) sablefish TAC to trawl gear in the West Yakutat District.
Proposed Apportionments to the allocated to participants after deducting mt of dusky rockfish to the entry level
Rockfish Program for incidental catch needs in other longline fishery in 2017 and 2018. The
These proposed 2017 and 2018 directed groundfish fisheries. allocation for the entry level longline
harvest specifications for the GOA Participants in the Rockfish Program fishery would increase incrementally
include the fishery cooperative also receive a portion of the Central each year if the catch exceeds 90
allocations and sideboard limitations GOA TAC of specific secondary species. percent of the allocation of a species.
established by the Rockfish Program. Besides groundfish species, the Rockfish The incremental increase in the
Program participants are primarily trawl Program allocates a portion of the allocation would continue each year
CVs and trawl C/Ps, with limited halibut PSC limit (191 mt) from the until it is the maximum percentage of
participation by vessels using longline third season deep-water species fishery the TAC for that species. In 2016, the
gear. The Rockfish Program assigns allowance for the GOA trawl fisheries to catch did not exceed 90 percent of any
quota share and cooperative quota to Rockfish Program participants allocated rockfish species. Therefore,
participants for primary (Pacific ocean (§ 679.81(d)). Rockfish Program
NMFS is not proposing an increase to
perch, northern rockfish, and dusky sideboards and halibut PSC limits are
the entry level longline fishery 2017 and
rockfish) and secondary species (Pacific discussed below.
2018 allocations in the Central GOA.
cod, rougheye rockfish, sablefish, Additionally, the Rockfish Program
establishes sideboard limits to restrict The remainder of the TACs for the
shortraker rockfish, and thornyhead
the ability of harvesters that operate rockfish primary species would be
rockfish), allows a participant holding a
under the Rockfish Program to increase allocated to the CV and C/P
license limitation program (LLP) license
with rockfish quota share to form a their participation in other, non- cooperatives. Table 6 lists the
rockfish cooperative with other persons, Rockfish Program fisheries. These allocations of the proposed 2017 and
and allows holders of C/P LLP licenses restrictions are discussed in a 2018 TACs for each rockfish primary
to opt out of the fishery. The Rockfish subsequent section titled ‘‘Rockfish species to the entry level longline
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Program also has an entry level fishery Program Groundfish Sideboard and fishery, the incremental increase for
for rockfish primary species for vessels Halibut PSC Limitations.’’ future years, and the maximum
using longline gear. Section 679.81(a)(2)(ii) requires percentage of the TAC for the entry level
Under the Rockfish Program, rockfish allocations of 5 mt of Pacific ocean longline fishery.
primary species in the Central GOA are perch, 5 mt of northern rockfish, and 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/9.svg)
![87890 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 6—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ALLOCATIONS OF ROCKFISH PRIMARY SPECIES TO THE ENTRY LEVEL LONGLINE
FISHERY IN THE CENTRAL GULF OF ALASKA
Up to maximum
Incremental increase in 2018 if ≥90
Rockfish primary species 2017 and 2018 allocations percent of each
percent of 2017 allocation is harvested TAC of:
Pacific ocean perch ................................ 5 metric tons .......................................... 5 metric tons .......................................... 1
Northern rockfish .................................... 5 metric tons .......................................... 5 metric tons .......................................... 2
Dusky rockfish ........................................ 30 metric tons ........................................ 20 metric tons ........................................ 5
Section 679.81(a)(2) requires Central GOA of 1,500 mt of Pacific P cooperatives are not due to NMFS
allocations of rockfish primary species ocean perch, 300 mt of northern until March 1 of each calendar year;
among various components of the rockfish, and 250 mt of dusky rockfish. therefore, NMFS cannot calculate 2017
Rockfish Program. Table 7 lists the These amounts are based on recent and 2018 allocations in conjunction
proposed 2017 and 2018 allocations of average incidental catches in the Central with these proposed harvest
rockfish in the Central GOA to the entry GOA by other groundfish fisheries. specifications. NMFS will post these
level longline fishery, and Rockfish CV Allocations among vessels belonging allocations on the Alaska Region Web
and C/P Cooperatives in the Rockfish to CV or C/P cooperatives are not site at http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
Program. NMFS also proposes setting included in these proposed harvest sustainablefisheries/rockfish/ when
aside incidental catch amounts (ICAs) specifications. Rockfish Program they become available after March 1.
for other directed fisheries in the applications for CV cooperatives and C/
TABLE 7—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ALLOCATIONS OF ROCKFISH PRIMARY SPECIES IN THE CENTRAL GULF OF ALASKA
TO THE ENTRY LEVEL LONGLINE FISHERY AND ROCKFISH COOPERATIVES IN THE ROCKFISH PROGRAM
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Incidental catch Allocation to Allocation to
Rockfish primary species TAC allowance TAC minus ICA the entry level the Rockfish
(ICA) longline 1 fishery Cooperatives 2
Pacific ocean perch ......................................... 16,860 1,500 15,360 5 15,535
Northern rockfish .............................................. 3,338 300 3,038 5 3,033
Dusky rockfish .................................................. 3,791 250 3,541 30 3,511
Total .......................................................... 23,989 2,050 21,939 40 21,899
1 Longline gear includes hook-and-line, jig, troll, and handline gear.
2 Rockfish cooperatives include vessels in CV and C/P cooperatives.
Section 679.81(c) requires allocations allocation, and thornyhead rockfish. C/ the apportionments of the proposed
of rockfish secondary species to CV and P cooperatives receive allocations of 2017 and 2018 TACs of rockfish
C/P cooperatives in the GOA. CV sablefish from the trawl allocation, secondary species in the Central GOA to
cooperatives receive allocations of rougheye rockfish, shortraker rockfish, CV and C/P cooperatives.
Pacific cod, sablefish from the trawl gear and thornyhead rockfish. Table 8 lists
TABLE 8—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 APPORTIONMENTS OF ROCKFISH SECONDARY SPECIES IN THE CENTRAL GOA TO
CATCHER VESSEL AND CATCHER/PROCESSOR COOPERATIVES
[Values are in metric tons]
Catcher vessel cooperatives Catcher/processor
cooperatives
Central GOA
Rockfish secondary species annual TAC Percentage of Apportionment Percentage of Apportionment
TAC (mt) TAC (mt)
Pacific cod ............................................................................ 31,958 3.81 1,218 0.0 0.0
Sablefish .............................................................................. 3,678 6.78 249 3.51 129
Shortraker rockfish ............................................................... 301 0.0 0 40.00 120
Rougheye rockfish ............................................................... 705 0.0 0 58.87 415
Thornyhead rockfish ............................................................ 988 7.84 77 26.50 262
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Halibut PSC Limits 2016, the Council recommended halibut fishery is apportioned 9 mt of the
PSC limits of 1,706 mt for trawl gear, halibut PSC limit in recognition of its
Section 679.21(d) establishes annual 257 mt for hook-and-line gear, and 9 mt small-scale harvests of groundfish.
halibut PSC limit apportionments to for the demersal shelf rockfish (DSR) NMFS estimates low halibut bycatch in
trawl and hook-and-line gear, and fishery in the SEO District. the DSR fishery because (1) the duration
authorizes the establishment of The DSR fishery in the SEO District of the DSR fisheries and the gear soak
apportionments for pot gear. In October is defined at § 679.21(d)(2)(ii)(A). This times are short, (2) the DSR fishery
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/10.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87891
occurs in the winter when less overlap gear fisheries. NMFS estimates halibut halibut biomass and expected catch of
occurs in the distribution of DSR and mortality is negligible in the jig gear target groundfish species, (4) expected
halibut, and (3) the directed commercial fisheries given the small amount of bycatch rates on a seasonal basis, (5)
DSR fishery has a low DSR TAC. The groundfish harvested by jig gear, the expected changes in directed groundfish
Alaska Department of Fish and Game selective nature of jig gear, and the high fishing seasons, (6) expected actual start
sets the commercial GHL for the DSR survival rates of halibut caught and of fishing effort, and (7) economic
fishery after deducting (1) estimates of released with jig gear. effects of establishing seasonal halibut
DSR incidental catch in all fisheries The best available information on allocations on segments of the target
(including halibut and subsistence) and estimated halibut bycatch consists of groundfish industry. Based on public
(2) the allocation to the DSR sport fish data collected by fisheries observers comment and the information presented
fishery. Of the 231 mt TAC for DSR in during 2016. The calculated halibut in the final 2016 SAFE report, the
2016, 188 mt were available for the DSR bycatch mortality through November 8, Council may recommend or NMFS may
commercial directed fishery, of which 8 2016, is 1,321 mt for trawl gear and 206 make changes to the seasonal, gear-type,
mt were harvested. mt for hook-and-line gear for a total or fishery category apportionments of
The FMP authorizes the Council to halibut mortality of 1,527 mt. This halibut PSC limits for the final 2017 and
exempt specific gear from the halibut halibut mortality was calculated using 2018 harvest specifications.
PSC limits. NMFS, after consultation groundfish and halibut catch data from The final 2016 and 2017 harvest
with the Council, proposes to exempt the NMFS Alaska Region’s catch specifications (81 FR 14740, March 18,
pot gear, jig gear, and the sablefish IFQ accounting system. This accounting 2016) summarized the Council’s and
hook-and-line gear fishery categories system contains historical and recent NMFS’ findings with respect to halibut
from the non-trawl halibut PSC limit for catch information compiled from each PSC for each of these FMP
2017 and 2018. The Council Alaska groundfish fishery. considerations. The Council’s and
recommended, and NMFS is proposing, Section 679.21(d)(4)(i) and (ii) NMFS’ findings for 2017 are unchanged
these exemptions because (1) pot gear authorizes NMFS to seasonally from 2016. Table 9 lists the proposed
fisheries have low annual halibut apportion the halibut PSC limits after 2017 and 2018 Pacific halibut PSC
bycatch mortality, (2) IFQ program consultation with the Council. The FMP limits, allowances, and apportionments.
regulations prohibit discard of halibut if and regulations require that the Council The halibut PSC limits in these tables
any halibut IFQ permit holder on board and NMFS consider the following reflect the halibut PSC limits set forth at
a CV holds unused halibut IFQ information in seasonally apportioning § 679.21(d)(2) and § 679.21(d)(3).
(§ 679.7(f)(11)), (3) some sablefish IFQ halibut PSC limits: (1) Seasonal Sections 679.21(d)(4)(iii) and (iv)
permit holders hold halibut IFQ permits distribution of halibut, (2) seasonal specify that any underages or overages
and are therefore required to retain the distribution of target groundfish species of a seasonal apportionment of a PSC
halibut they catch while fishing relative to halibut distribution, (3) limit will be deducted from or added to
sablefish IFQ, and (4) NMFS estimates expected halibut bycatch needs on a the next respective seasonal
negligible halibut mortality for the jig seasonal basis relative to changes in apportionment within the fishing year.
TABLE 9—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 PACIFIC HALIBUT PSC LIMITS, ALLOWANCES, AND APPORTIONMENTS
[Values are in metric tons]
Trawl gear Hook-and-line gear 1
Other than DSR DSR
Season Percent Amount
Season Percent Amount Season Amount
January 20–April 1 .............. 27.5 469 January 1–June 10 ............. 86 221 January 1–December 31 .... 9
April 1–July 1 ....................... 20 341 June 10–September 1 ........ 2 5
July 1–September 1 ............ 30 512 September 1–December 31 12 31
September 1–October 1 ...... 7.5 128
October 1–December 31 ..... 15 256
Total ............................. .............. 1,706 ............................................. .............. 257 ............................................. 9
1 The Pacific halibut prohibited species catch (PSC) limit for hook-and-line gear is allocated to the demersal shelf rockfish (DSR) fishery and
fisheries other than DSR. The hook-and-line sablefish fishery is exempt from halibut PSC limits, as are pot and jig gear for all groundfish
fisheries.
Section 679.21(d)(3)(ii) authorizes deep-water flatfish, rex sole, and Table 28d to 50 CFR part 679 specifies
further apportionment of the trawl arrowtooth flounder; and (2) a shallow- the amount of the trawl halibut PSC
halibut PSC limit as bycatch allowances water species fishery, composed of limit that is assigned to the CV and
to trawl fishery categories. The annual pollock, Pacific cod, shallow-water C/P sectors that are participating in the
apportionments are based on each flatfish, flathead sole, Atka mackerel, Central GOA Rockfish Program. This
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
category’s proportional share of the skates and ‘‘other species’’ (sculpins, includes 117 mt of halibut PSC limit to
anticipated halibut bycatch mortality sharks, squids, and octopuses) the CV sector and 74 mt of halibut PSC
during a fishing year and optimization (§ 679.21(d)(3)(iii)). Table 10 lists the limit to the C/P sector. These amounts
of the total amount of groundfish proposed 2017 and 2018 seasonal are allocated from the trawl deep-water
harvest under the halibut PSC limit. The apportionments of trawl halibut PSC species fishery’s halibut PSC third
fishery categories for the trawl halibut limits between the trawl gear deep- seasonal apportionment.
PSC limits are (1) a deep-water species water and the shallow-water species Section 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(B) limits the
fishery, composed of sablefish, rockfish, fisheries. amount of the halibut PSC limit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/11.svg)
![87892 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
allocated to Rockfish Program the unused annual halibut PSC limit is unavailable for use by vessels
participants that could be re- apportioned to Rockfish Program directed fishing with trawl gear for the
apportioned to the general GOA trawl participants. The remainder of the remainder of the fishing year
fisheries to no more than 55 percent of unused Rockfish Program halibut PSC (§ 679.21(d)(4)(iii)(C)).
TABLE 10—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 SEASONAL APPORTIONMENTS OF THE PACIFIC HALIBUT PSC LIMIT APPORTIONED
BETWEEN THE TRAWL GEAR SHALLOW-WATER AND DEEP-WATER SPECIES FISHERIES
[Values are in metric tons]
Season Shallow-water Deep-water 1 Total
January 20–April 1 ........................................................................................................... 384 85 469
April 1–July 1 ................................................................................................................... 85 256 341
July 1–September 1 ......................................................................................................... 171 341 512
September 1–October 1 .................................................................................................. 128 (3) 128
Subtotal, January 20–October 1 .............................................................................. 768 682 1,450
October 1–December 31 2 ............................................................................................... ............................ ............................ 256
Total ................................................................................................................... ............................ ............................ 1,706
1 Vessels participating in cooperatives in the Rockfish Program will receive 191 mt of the third season (July 1 through September 1) deep-
water species fishery halibut PSC apportionment.
2 There is no apportionment between trawl shallow-water and deep-water species fisheries during the fifth season (October 1 through Decem-
ber 31).
3 Any remainder.
Section 679.21(d)(2) requires that the proposed rule to implement between the hook-and-line CV and
‘‘other hook-and-line fishery’’ halibut Amendment 83 to the FMP (76 FR hook-and-line C/P sectors in the GOA.
PSC apportionment to vessels using 44700, July 26, 2011) and is not No later than November 1 of each
hook-and-line gear must be divided repeated here. year, NMFS calculates the projected
between CVs and C/Ps. NMFS must For 2017 and 2018, NMFS proposes
unused amount of halibut PSC limit by
calculate the halibut PSC limit annual halibut PSC limit
apportionments of 129 mt and 128 mt to either of the hook-and-line sectors for
apportionments for the entire GOA to
hook-and-line CVs and C/Ps in the hook-and-line CV and hook-and-line the remainder of the year. The projected
accordance with § 679.21(d)(2)(iii) in C/P sectors, respectively. The 2017 and unused amount of halibut PSC limit is
conjunction with these harvest 2018 annual halibut PSC limits are made available to the other hook-and-
specifications. A comprehensive divided into three seasonal line sector for the remainder of that
description and example of the apportionments, using seasonal fishing year if NMFS determines that an
calculations necessary to apportion the percentages of 86 percent, 2 percent, additional amount of halibut PSC limit
‘‘other hook-and-line fishery’’ halibut and 12 percent. Table 11 lists the is necessary for that sector to continue
PSC limit between the hook-and-line CV proposed 2017 and 2018 annual halibut its directed fishing operations
and C/P sectors were included in the PSC limits and seasonal apportionments (§ 679.21(d)(2)(iii)(C)).
TABLE 11—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 APPORTIONMENTS OF THE ‘‘OTHER HOOK-AND-LINE FISHERIES’’ HALIBUT PSC
ALLOWANCE BETWEEN THE HOOK-AND-LINE GEAR CATCHER VESSEL AND CATCHER/PROCESSOR SECTORS
[Values are in metric tons]
‘‘Other than Sector
Sector annual Seasonal
DSR’’ Hook-and-line sector Season seasonal
amount percentage
allowance amount
257 .................. Catcher Vessel ............. 129 January 1–June 10 .............................................. 86 111
June 10–September 1 ......................................... 2 3
September 1–December 31 ................................ 12 15
Catcher/Processor ........ 128 January 1–June 10 .............................................. 86 110
June 10–September 1 ......................................... 2 3
September 1–December 31 ................................ 12 15
Halibut Discard Mortality Rates incidental catch rates are based on estimated using the best information
observers’ estimates of halibut available in conjunction with the annual
To monitor halibut bycatch mortality incidental catch in the groundfish GOA stock assessment process. The
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
allowances and apportionments, the fishery. DMRs are estimates of the DMR methodology and findings are
Regional Administrator uses observed proportion of incidentally caught included as an appendix to the annual
halibut incidental catch rates, halibut halibut that do not survive after being GOA groundfish SAFE report.
discard mortality rates (DMRs), and returned to the sea. The cumulative Historically, DMRs consisted of long-
estimates of groundfish catch to project halibut mortality that accrues to a term averages of annual DMRs within
when a fishery’s halibut bycatch particular halibut PSC limit is the target fisheries that were defined by
mortality allowance or seasonal product of a DMR multiplied by the management area, gear, and target
apportionment is reached. Halibut estimated halibut PSC. DMRs are species. Since the late 1990s, halibut
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/12.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87893
DMRs were calculated by the sector) rather than target fisheries; and • Change the reference time-frame for
International Pacific Halibut revision of reference timeframes to DMR calculations. Rather than using 10-
Commission (IPHC), which then obtain estimates that are more year average rates, the revised
provided the estimates to the NMFS for responsive to changes in how the methodology estimates DMRs based on
application in managing halibut bycatch groundfish fisheries are observed and and initial 3-year average rates. Using
limits. DMRs specified through the managed. These recommendations, and 2013 as the starting year is more
Council process and used for catch others, are described below. responsive to, and better aligns DMR
accounting by NMFS have consisted of • Revise the DMR estimation calculation methodology with, the 2013
long-term averages of annual estimates methodology for consistency with the restructured Observer Program’s
within target fisheries that are defined sampling protocols instituted in 2013 sampling protocols. Using 2013 as the
by region, gear, and target species. Long- through the restructured Observer base year, NMFS and the Council will
term averages are taken from annual Program. The Observer Program evaluate the time frame each year.
estimates for the most recent 10-year randomizes sampling of fishing trips Evaluating the time frame each year will
period with the number of years with within operational groupings, sampling enable NMFS and the Council to update
data to support annual DMR estimates of hauls within fishing trips, and the methodology and the halibut DMRs
varying among fisheries. Fishery- sampling of biological data within based on the best available information.
specific DMRs, once calculated, have hauls. Basing halibut DMR estimation The working group’s discussion paper
generally been put in place for 3-year on a sampling design consistent with also included a comparison of the total
increments. Observer Program sampling protocols amount of halibut mortality that accrues
NMFS proposes to revise methods for should reduce the potential for using current DMRs versus the working
estimating DMRs consistent with those sampling bias, improve data on group’s recommended DMRs.
methods developed by the halibut DMR operational causes of variation in post- Calculating the 2015 halibut mortality
working group and recommended by the capture halibut viability, and promote using specified DMRs yielded 1,620 mt
Council at its October 2016 meeting. the ability for NMFS to make timely of halibut mortality, whereas using the
NMFS proposes for the 2017 and 2018 improvements to halibut DMR recommended DMRs yielded 1,688 mt
GOA groundfish harvest specifications estimation in the future. of halibut morality (a four percent
revised DMRs consistent with modified increase). Calculating the 2016 halibut
DMR estimation methodology. The • Incorporate the use of vessel mortality (through September 2016)
proposed change will make the DMR operations into DMR estimation yielded 1,243 mt of halibut mortality,
process transparent, transferable, and methodology. This incorporates data versus 1,256 mt of halibut mortality
allow for review by all agencies/entities about the viability (likelihood to when applying the recommended DMRs
involved. The Alaska Region will survive) of discarded halibut into DMR (a one percent increase).
program the revised DMRs into its calculations. Data based on different These proposed estimation methods,
groundfish catch accounting system to vessel operational categories, such as and recommendations for 2017 and
monitor the 2017 and 2018 halibut sorting practices, handling practices, 2018 halibut DMRs, were presented to
bycatch allowances (see Tables 9, 10, gear type, and processing sectors (i.e. the Plan Team in September 2016. The
and 11). The DMRs proposed for 2017 CVs, CPs, and CVs delivering to Plan Team concurred with the revised
and 2018 GOA groundfish harvest motherships), provide better methodology, as well as the working
specifications reflect an ongoing effort information on halibut viability. NMFS group’s halibut DMR recommendations
by the Council to improve the expects that incorporating this for 2017 and 2018. The Council agreed
estimation of DMRs in the Alaska information into the DMR estimation with these recommendations at the
groundfish fisheries. methodology will yield a more precise Council’s October 2016 meeting.
The halibut DMR working group, estimate of actual mortality. Additionally, in April 2016 the SSC
consisting of the IPHC, Council, and • Remove the use of target fishery. reviewed the methodology and made a
NMFS Alaska Region staff, Fishery targets do not necessarily number of suggestions for improving
recommended the following broad characterize statistical and/or vessel and refining it. The working group has
changes to the DMR estimation method: operational differences in the sampling incorporated those suggestions into its
Implementation of sampling design or handling of halibut PSC. Using DMR estimation methodology. The
consistent with sampling protocols used fishery target aggregations may have working group’s discussion of the
under the Observer Restructuring reduced the quality of DMR estimates revised halibut DMR methodology,
Program; categorization of data of due to small sample sizes or by including the comparative assessment,
halibut viability based on vessel combining vessel operations with very is available from the Council (see
operations (sorting and handling important differences in sampling and ADDRESSES). Table 12 lists the proposed
practices, gear type, and processing handling characteristics. 2017 and 2018 DMRs.
TABLE 12—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR VESSELS FISHING IN THE GULF OF
ALASKA
[Values are percent of halibut assumed to be dead]
Discard
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Gear Sector Program mortality rate
(percent)
Hook-and-line .......................................... C/P ........................................................... non-Rockfish Program ............................. 11
Hook-and-line .......................................... CV ............................................................ non-Rockfish Program ............................. 12
Pot ........................................................... CV and C/P ............................................. non-Rockfish Program ............................. 10
Pelagic trawl ............................................ CV ............................................................ Rockfish Program .................................... 100
Non-pelagic trawl ..................................... CV ............................................................ Rockfish Program .................................... 85
Pelagic trawl ............................................ CV ............................................................ non-Rockfish Program ............................. 100
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/13.svg)
![87894 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 12—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 HALIBUT DISCARD MORTALITY RATES FOR VESSELS FISHING IN THE GULF OF
ALASKA—Continued
[Values are percent of halibut assumed to be dead]
Discard
Gear Sector Program mortality rate
(percent)
Non-pelagic trawl ..................................... CV ............................................................ non-Rockfish Program ............................. 63
Non-pelagic trawl ..................................... C/P and Mothership ................................ non-Rockfish Program ............................. 85
Non-pelagic trawl ..................................... C/P ........................................................... Rockfish Program .................................... 85
Pelagic trawl ............................................ C/P ........................................................... Rockfish Program .................................... 100
Pelagic trawl ............................................ C/P ........................................................... non-Rockfish Program ............................. 100
Chinook Salmon Prohibited Species The Chinook salmon PSC limit for limits on AFA C/Ps and CVs in the
Catch Limit two sectors, trawl C/Ps and trawl CVs GOA. These sideboard limits are
not participating in the Rockfish necessary to protect the interests of
Amendment 93 to the FMP (77 FR Program, may be increased in fishermen and processors who do not
42629, July 20, 2012) established subsequent years based on the directly benefit from the AFA from
separate Chinook salmon PSC limits in performance of these two sectors and those fishermen and processors who
the Western and Central GOA in the their ability to minimize their use of receive exclusive harvesting and
directed pollock trawl fishery. These their respective Chinook salmon PSC processing privileges under the AFA.
limits require NMFS to close the pollock limits. If either or both of these two Section 679.7(k)(1)(ii) prohibits listed
directed fishery in the Western and sectors limits its use of Chinook salmon
Central regulatory areas of the GOA if AFA C/Ps from harvesting any species
PSC to a certain threshold amount in
the applicable limit is reached of fish in the GOA. Additionally,
2016, that sector will receive an
(§ 679.21(h)(8)). The annual Chinook incremental increase to its 2017 § 679.7(k)(1)(iv) prohibits listed AFA
salmon PSC limits in the pollock Chinook salmon PSC limit C/Ps from processing any pollock
directed fishery of 6,684 salmon in the (§ 679.21(h)(4)). NMFS will evaluate the harvested in a directed pollock fishery
Western GOA and 18,316 salmon in the annual Chinook salmon PSC by trawl in the GOA and any groundfish
Central GOA are set in § 679.21(h)(2)(i) C/Ps and non-Rockfish Program CVs harvested in Statistical Area 630 of the
and (ii). In addition, all salmon when the 2016 fishing year is complete GOA.
(regardless of species), taken in the to determine whether to increase the AFA CVs that are less than 125 ft
pollock directed fisheries in the Western Chinook salmon PSC limits for these (38.1 meters) length overall, have
and Central GOA must be retained until two sectors. Based on preliminary 2016 annual landings of pollock in the Bering
an observer at the processing facility Chinook salmon PSC data, the trawl Sea and Aleutian Islands of less than
that takes delivery of the catch is C/P sector will receive an incremental 5,100 mt, and have made at least 40
provided an opportunity to count the increase of its Chinook salmon PSC landings of GOA groundfish from 1995
number of salmon and to collect any limit, as will the non-Rockfish Program through 1997 are exempt from GOA
scientific data or biological samples CV sector. This evaluation will be
sideboard limits under § 679.64(b)(2)(ii).
from the salmon (§ 679.21(h)(6)). completed in conjunction with the final
2017 and 2018 harvest specifications. Sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA
Amendment 97 to the FMP (79 FR As described earlier in this preamble, CVs operating in the GOA are based on
71350, December 2, 2014) established an Amendment 103 to the FMP became their traditional harvest levels of TAC in
initial annual PSC limit of 7,500 effective in 2016. The regulations groundfish fisheries covered by the
Chinook salmon for the non-pollock associated with Amendment 103 FMP. Section 679.64(b)(3)(iv)
groundfish fisheries. This limit is authorize NMFS to use inseason establishes the groundfish sideboard
apportioned among three sectors: 3,600 management actions to reapportion limitations in the GOA based on the
Chinook salmon to trawl C/Ps; 1,200 unused Chinook salmon PSC among the retained catch of non-exempt AFA CVs
Chinook salmon to trawl CVs pollock and non-pollock sectors. As of of each sideboard species from 1995
participating in the Rockfish Program; November 15, 2016, NMFS has not through 1997 divided by the TAC for
and 2,700 Chinook salmon to trawl CVs exercised this authority, as none of the that species over the same period.
not participating in the Rockfish trawl sectors have needed such
Program that are fishing for groundfish Table 13 lists the proposed 2017 and
reapportionments.
species other than pollock 2018 groundfish sideboard limits for
(§ 679.21(h)(4)). NMFS will monitor the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Catcher/ non-exempt AFA CVs. NMFS will
Chinook salmon PSC in the non-pollock Processor and Catcher Vessel deduct all targeted or incidental catch of
GOA groundfish fisheries and close an Groundfish Sideboard Limits sideboard species made by non-exempt
applicable sector if it reaches its Section 679.64 establishes groundfish AFA CVs from the sideboard limits
Chinook salmon PSC limit. harvesting and processing sideboard listed in Table 13.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/14.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87895
TABLE 13—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 GOA NON-EXEMPT AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL (CV)
GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Ratio of Proposed
1995–1997 2017 and
non-exempt Proposed
Apportionments by 2018 non-
Species Area/component AFA 2017 and
season/gear exempt AFA
CV catch 2018 TACs 3 CV sideboard
to 1995– limit
1997 TAC
Pollock ................................... A Season—January 20– Shumagin (610) .................... 0.6047 3,769 2,279
March 10. Chirikof (620) ........................ 0.1167 42,732 4,987
Kodiak (630) ......................... 0.2028 12,272 2,489
B Season—March 10–May Shumagin (610) .................... 0.6047 3,769 2,279
31. Chirikof (620) ........................ 0.1167 49,996 5,835
Kodiak (630) ......................... 0.2028 5,007 1,015
C Season—August 25–Octo- Shumagin (610) .................... 0.6047 24,060 14,549
ber 1. Chirikof (620) ........................ 0.1167 15,176 1,771
Kodiak (630) ......................... 0.2028 19,529 3,960
D Season—October 1–No- Shumagin (610) .................... 0.6047 24,060 14,549
vember 1. Chirikof (620) ........................ 0.1167 15,175 1,771
Kodiak (630) ......................... 0.2028 19,529 3,960
Annual ................................... WYK (640) ............................ 0.3495 9,209 3,219
SEO (650) ............................. 0.3495 9,920 3,467
Pacific cod ............................. A Season 1—January 1–June W .......................................... 0.1331 14,699 1,956
10. C ........................................... 0.0692 19,175 1,327
B Season 2—September 1– W .......................................... 0.1331 9,799 1,304
December 31. C ........................................... 0.0692 12,783 885
Annual ................................... E inshore .............................. 0.0079 5,124 40
E offshore ............................. 0.0078 569 4
Sablefish ................................ Annual, trawl gear ................ W .......................................... 0.0000 233 0
C ........................................... 0.0642 736 47
E ........................................... 0.0433 173 8
Flatfish, shallow-water ........... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0156 13,250 207
C ........................................... 0.0587 17,680 1,038
E ........................................... 0.0126 3,925 49
Flatfish, deep-water ............... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0000 187 0
C ........................................... 0.0647 3,516 227
E ........................................... 0.0128 5,578 71
Rex sole ................................ Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0007 1,318 1
C ........................................... 0.0384 4,453 171
E ........................................... 0.0029 1,736 5
Arrowtooth flounder ............... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0021 14,500 30
C ........................................... 0.0280 75,000 2,100
E ........................................... 0.0002 13,800 3
Flathead sole ......................... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0036 8,650 31
C ........................................... 0.0213 15,400 328
E ........................................... 0.0009 3,800 3
Pacific ocean perch ............... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0023 2,709 6
C ........................................... 0.0748 16,860 1,261
E ........................................... 0.0466 4,620 215
Northern rockfish ................... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0003 430 0
C ........................................... 0.0277 3,338 92
Shortraker rockfish ................ Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0000 38 0
C ........................................... 0.0218 301 7
E ........................................... 0.0110 947 10
Dusky Rockfish ...................... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0001 159 0
C ........................................... 0.0000 3,791 0
E ........................................... 0.0067 334 2
Rougheye rockfish ................. Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0000 105 0
C ........................................... 0.0237 705 17
E ........................................... 0.0124 515 6
Demersal shelf rockfish ......... Annual ................................... SEO ...................................... 0.0020 231 0
Thornyhead rockfish .............. Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0280 291 8
C ........................................... 0.0280 988 28
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
E ........................................... 0.0280 682 19
Other Rockfish ....................... Annual ................................... W/C ....................................... 0.1699 1,534 261
E ........................................... 0.0000 774 0
Atka mackerel ........................ Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0309 2,000 62
Big skates .............................. Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0063 908 6
C ........................................... 0.0063 1,850 12
E ........................................... 0.0063 1,056 7
Longnose skates ................... Annual ................................... W .......................................... 0.0063 61 0
C ........................................... 0.0063 2,513 16
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/15.svg)
![87896 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 13—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 GOA NON-EXEMPT AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL (CV)
GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS—Continued
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Ratio of Proposed
1995–1997 2017 and
non-exempt Proposed
Apportionments by 2018 non-
Species Area/component AFA 2017 and
season/gear exempt AFA
CV catch 2018 TACs 3 CV sideboard
to 1995– limit
1997 TAC
E ........................................... 0.0063 632 4
Other skates .......................... Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0063 1,919 12
Sculpins ................................. Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0063 5,591 35
Sharks ................................... Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0063 4,514 28
Squids .................................... Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0063 1,148 7
Octopuses ............................. Annual ................................... Gulfwide ................................ 0.0063 4,878 31
1 The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
2 The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
3 The Western and Central GOA area apportionments of pollock are considered ACLs.
Non-Exempt AFA Catcher Vessel based on the aggregate retained fishery from 1995 through 1997
Halibut PSC Limits groundfish catch by non-exempt AFA (§ 679.64(b)(4)). Table 14 lists the
CVs in each PSC target category from proposed 2017 and 2018 non-exempt
The halibut PSC sideboard limits for 1995 through 1997 divided by the AFA CV halibut PSC limits for vessels
non-exempt AFA CVs in the GOA are retained catch of all vessels in that using trawl gear in the GOA.
TABLE 14—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 NON-EXEMPT AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CATCHER VESSEL HALIBUT PROHIBITED
SPECIES CATCH (PSC) LIMITS FOR VESSELS USING TRAWL GEAR IN THE GOA
[PSC limits are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Ratio of
1995–1997 Proposed
Proposed
non-exempt AFA 2017 and 2018
Season Season dates Fishery category 2017 and 2018
CV retained non-exempt AFA
PSC limit
catch to total CV PSC limit
retained catch
1 ..................... January 20–April 1 ..................... shallow-water .............................. 0.340 384 131
deep-water .................................. 0.070 85 6
2 ..................... April 1–July 1 .............................. shallow-water .............................. 0.340 85 29
deep-water .................................. 0.070 256 18
3 ..................... July 1–September 1 ................... shallow-water .............................. 0.340 171 58
deep-water .................................. 0.070 341 24
4 ..................... September 1–October 1 ............. shallow-water .............................. 0.340 128 44
deep-water .................................. 0.070 0 0
5 ..................... October 1–December 31 ............ all targets .................................... 0.205 256 52
Annual ..... ..................................................... Total shallow-water .................... ............................ ............................ 262
Total deep-water ........................ ............................ ............................ 48
Grand Total, all seasons and ............................ 1,706 362
categories.
Non-AFA Crab Vessel Groundfish each GOA groundfish fishery (except Tanner Crabs (Crab FMP) (70 FR 10174,
Sideboard Limits the fixed-gear sablefish fishery). March 2, 2005), Amendment 34 to the
Sideboard limits also apply to landings Crab FMP (76 FR 35772, June 20, 2011),
Section 680.22 establishes groundfish made using an LLP license derived from Amendment 83 to the GOA FMP (76 FR
sideboard limits for vessels with a the history of a restricted vessel, even if 74670, December 1, 2011), and
history of participation in the Bering that LLP license is used on another Amendment 45 to the Crab FMP (80 FR
Sea snow crab fishery to prevent these vessel. 28539, May 19, 2015).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
vessels from using the increased The basis for these sideboard harvest Table 15 lists the proposed 2017 and
flexibility provided by the Crab limits is described in detail in the final 2018 groundfish sideboard limitations
Rationalization Program to expand their rules implementing the major for non-AFA crab vessels. All targeted
level of participation in the GOA provisions of the Crab Rationalization or incidental catch of sideboard species
groundfish fisheries. Sideboard harvest Program, including Amendments 18 and made by non-AFA crab vessels or
limits restrict these vessels’ catch to 19 to the Fishery Management Plan for associated LLP licenses will be
their collective historical landings in Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and deducted from these sideboard limits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/16.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87897
TABLE 15—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 GOA NON-AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CRAB VESSEL GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Ratio of
1996–2000 Proposed 2017
non-AFA crab Proposed 2017 and 2018 non-
Species Season/gear Area/component/gear vessel catch to and 2018 TACs AFA crab vessel
1996–2000 sideboard limit
total harvest
Pollock ............................... A Season—January 20– Shumagin (610) ................ 0.0098 3,769 37
March 10. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.0031 42,732 132
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.0002 12,272 2
B Season—March 10–May Shumagin (610) ................ 0.0098 3,769 37
31. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.0031 49,996 155
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.0002 5,007 1
C Season—August 25– Shumagin (610) ................ 0.0098 24,060 236
October 1. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.0031 15,176 47
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.0002 19,529 4
D Season—October 1–No- Shumagin (610) ................ 0.0098 24,060 236
vember 1. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.0031 15,175 47
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.0002 19,529 4
Annual .............................. WYK (640) ........................ 0.0000 9,209
SEO (650) ........................ 0.0000 9,920
Pacific cod ......................... A Season 1—January 1– W Jig CV .......................... 0.0000 14,699
June 10. W Hook-and-line CV ......... 0.0004 14,699 6
W Pot CV ......................... 0.0997 14,699 1,466
W Pot C/P ........................ 0.0078 14,699 115
W Trawl CV ...................... 0.0007 14,699 10
C Jig CV ........................... 0.0000 19,175 ............................
C Hook-and-line CV ......... 0.0001 19,175 2
C Pot CV .......................... 0.0474 19,175 909
C Pot C/P ......................... 0.0136 19,175 261
C Trawl CV ....................... 0.0012 19,175 23
B Season 2—September W Jig CV .......................... 0.0000 9,799
1–December 31 W Hook-and-line CV ......... 0.0004 9,799 4
W Pot CV ......................... 0.0997 9,799 977
W Pot C/P ........................ 0.0078 9,799 76
W Trawl CV ...................... 0.0007 9,799 7
C Jig CV ........................... 0.0000 12,783 ............................
C Hook-and-line CV ......... 0.0001 12,783 1
C Pot CV .......................... 0.0474 12,783 606
C Pot C/P ......................... 0.0136 12,783 174
C Trawl CV ....................... 0.0012 12,783 15
Annual .............................. E inshore .......................... 0.0110 5,124 56
E offshore ......................... 0.0000 569 ............................
Sablefish ............................ Annual, trawl gear ............ W ...................................... 0.0000 233 ............................
C ....................................... 0.0000 736 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 173 ............................
Flatfish, shallow-water ....... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0059 13,250 78
C ....................................... 0.0001 17,680 2
E ....................................... 0.0000 3,925 ............................
Flatfish, deep-water ........... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0035 187 1
C ....................................... 0.0000 3,516 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 5,578 ............................
Rex sole ............................. Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0000 1,318 ............................
C ....................................... 0.0000 4,453 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 1,736 ............................
Arrowtooth flounder ........... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0004 14,500 6
C ....................................... 0.0001 75,000 8
E ....................................... 0.0000 13,800 ............................
Flathead sole ..................... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0002 8,650 2
C ....................................... 0.0004 15,400 6
E ....................................... 0.0000 3,800 ............................
Pacific ocean perch ........... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0000 2,709 ............................
C ....................................... 0.0000 16,860 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 4,620 ............................
Northern rockfish ............... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0005 430 0
C ....................................... 0.0000 3,338 ............................
Shortraker rockfish ............ Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0013 38 0
C ....................................... 0.0012 301 0
E ....................................... 0.0009 947 1
Dusky rockfish ................... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0017 159 0
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
C ....................................... 0.0000 3,791 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 334 ............................
Rougheye rockfish ............. Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0067 105 1
C ....................................... 0.0047 705 3
E ....................................... 0.0008 515 0
Demersal shelf rockfish ..... Annual .............................. SEO .................................. 0.0000 231 ............................
Thornyhead rockfish .......... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0047 291 1
C ....................................... 0.0066 988 7
E ....................................... 0.0045 682 3
Other rockfish .................... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0035 1,534 5
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/17.svg)
![87898 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 15—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 GOA NON-AMERICAN FISHERIES ACT CRAB VESSEL GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD
LIMITS—Continued
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Ratio of
1996–2000 Proposed 2017
non-AFA crab Proposed 2017 and 2018 non-
Species Season/gear Area/component/gear vessel catch to and 2018 TACs AFA crab vessel
1996–2000 sideboard limit
total harvest
C ....................................... 0.0033 774 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 2,000 ............................
Atka mackerel .................... Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0000 908 36
Big skate ............................ Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0392 1,850 29
C ....................................... 0.0159 1,056 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 61 2
Longnose skate ................. Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.0392 2,513 40
C ....................................... 0.0159 632 ............................
E ....................................... 0.0000 1,919 34
Other skates ...................... Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0176 5,591 98
Sculpins ............................. Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0176 4,514 79
Sharks ................................ Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0176 1,148 20
Squids ................................ Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0176 4,878 86
Octopuses .......................... Annual .............................. Gulfwide ............................ 0.0176 38 0
1 The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
2 The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
Rockfish Program Groundfish Sideboard rockfish, and Pacific ocean perch in the District from July 1 through July 31.
and Halibut PSC Limitations Western GOA and West Yakutat Holders of C/P-designated LLP licenses
Districts from July 1 through July 31. that opt out of participating in a
The Rockfish Program establishes Also, CVs may not participate in Rockfish Program cooperative will be
three classes of sideboard provisions: directed fishing for arrowtooth flounder,
CV groundfish sideboard restrictions, able to access those sideboard limits
deep-water flatfish, and rex sole in the that are not assigned to Rockfish
C/P rockfish sideboard restrictions, and GOA from July 1 through July 31
C/P opt-out vessel sideboard Program cooperatives. Table 16 lists the
(§ 679.82(d)). proposed 2017 and 2018 Rockfish
restrictions. These sideboards are C/Ps participating in Rockfish
intended to limit the ability of rockfish Program C/P rockfish sideboard limits
Program cooperatives are restricted by
harvesters to expand into other in the Western GOA and West Yakutat
rockfish and halibut PSC sideboard
fisheries. limits. These C/Ps are prohibited from District. Due to confidentiality
CVs participating in the Rockfish directed fishing for northern rockfish, requirements associated with fisheries
Program may not participate in directed Pacific ocean perch, and dusky rockfish data, the sideboard limits for the West
fishing for dusky rockfish, northern in the Western GOA and West Yakutat Yakutat District are not displayed.
TABLE 16—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ROCKFISH PROGRAM SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR THE WESTERN GOA AND WEST
YAKUTAT DISTRICT BY FISHERY FOR THE CATCHER/PROCESSOR (C/P) SECTOR
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Proposed 2017
C/P sector Proposed 2017 and 2018 C/P
Area Fishery (% of TAC) and 2018 TACs sideboard
limit
Western GOA ........................................... Dusky rockfish ......................................... 72.3 .................... 159 115
Pacific ocean perch ................................. 50.6 .................... 2,709 1,371
Northern rockfish ..................................... 74.3 .................... 430 319
West Yakutat District ................................ Dusky rockfish ......................................... Confidential 1 251 Confidential 1
Pacific ocean perch ................................. Confidential 1 2,818 Confidential 1
1 Not released due to confidentiality requirements associated with fish ticket data, as established by NMFS and the State of Alaska.
Under the Rockfish Program, the C/P that opt out of the Rockfish Program are linked to the catch history of
sector is subject to halibut PSC would be able to access that portion of specific vessels that may choose to opt
sideboard limits for the trawl deep- the deep-water and shallow-water out. After March 1, NMFS will
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
water and shallow-water species halibut PSC sideboard limit not determine which C/Ps have opted-out of
fisheries from July 1 through July 31. No assigned to C/P rockfish cooperatives. the Rockfish Program in 2017, and will
halibut PSC sideboard limits apply to The sideboard provisions for C/Ps that know the ratios and amounts used to
the CV sector, as vessels participating in elect to opt out of participating in a calculate opt-out sideboard ratios.
a rockfish cooperative receive a portion rockfish cooperative are described in NMFS will then calculate any
of the annual halibut PSC limit. C/Ps § 679.82(c), (e), and (f). Sideboard limits applicable opt-out sideboard limits and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/18.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87899
post these limits on the Alaska Region fisheries.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/ 2018 proposed Rockfish Program
Web site at http://alaska rockfish/. Table 17 lists the 2017 and halibut PSC limits for the C/P sector.
TABLE 17—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 ROCKFISH PROGRAM HALIBUT MORTALITY LIMITS FOR THE CATCHER/PROCESSOR
SECTOR
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Annual deep-
Shallow-water Deep-water Annual shallow- water species
species species water species
Annual halibut fishery
fishery fishery fishery halibut
Sector mortality limit halibut PSC
halibut PSC halibut PSC PSC sideboard
(mt) sideboard
sideboard ratio sideboard ratio limit limit
(percent) (percent) (mt) (mt)
Catcher/processor ............................................ 0.10 2.50 1,706 2 43
Amendment 80 Program Groundfish 80 Program to expand their harvest Groundfish sideboard limits for
and PSC Sideboard Limits efforts in the GOA. Amendment 80 Program vessels
Amendment 80 to the Fishery Section 679.92 establishes groundfish operating in the GOA are based on their
Management Plan for Groundfish of the harvesting sideboard limits on all average aggregate harvests from 1998
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Amendment 80 Program vessels, other through 2004. Table 18 lists the
Management Area (Amendment 80 than the F/V Golden Fleece, to amounts proposed 2017 and 2018 sideboard
Program) established a limited access no greater than the limits shown in limits for Amendment 80 Program
privilege program for the non-AFA trawl Table 37 to part 679. Under § 679.92(d), vessels. NMFS will deduct all targeted
C/P sector. The Amendment 80 Program the F/V Golden Fleece is prohibited or incidental catch of sideboard species
established groundfish and halibut PSC from directed fishing for pollock, Pacific made by Amendment 80 Program
limits for Amendment 80 Program cod, Pacific ocean perch, dusky vessels from the sideboard limits in
participants to limit the ability of rockfish, and northern rockfish in the Table 18.
participants eligible for the Amendment GOA.
TABLE 18—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 GOA GROUNDFISH SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AMENDMENT 80 PROGRAM VESSELS
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Proposed
Ratio of 2017 and 2018
Amendment 80 Proposed 2017 Amendment 80
Species Season Area sector vessels and 2018 TAC vessel sideboard
1998–2004 (mt) limits
catch to TAC (mt)
Pollock ............................... A Season—January 20– Shumagin (610) ................ 0.003 3,769 11
February 25. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.002 42,732 85
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.002 12,272 25
B Season—March 10–May Shumagin (610) ................ 0.003 3,769 11
31. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.002 49,996 100
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.002 5,007 10
C Season—August 25– Shumagin (610) ................ 0.003 24,060 72
September 15. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.002 15,176 30
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.002 19,529 39
D Season—October 1–No- Shumagin (610) ................ 0.003 24,060 72
vember 1. Chirikof (620) .................... 0.002 15,175 30
Kodiak (630) ..................... 0.002 19,529 39
Annual .............................. WYK (640) ........................ 0.002 9,209 18
Pacific cod ......................... A Season 1—January 1– W ...................................... 0.020 14,699 294
June 10. C ....................................... 0.044 19,175 844
B Season 2—September W ...................................... 0.020 9,799 196
1–December 31. C ....................................... 0.044 12,783 562
Annual .............................. WYK ................................. 0.034 5,693 194
Pacific ocean perch ........... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.994 2,709 2,693
WYK ................................. 0.961 2,818 2,708
Northern rockfish ............... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 1.000 430 430
Dusky rockfish ................... Annual .............................. W ...................................... 0.764 159 121
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
WYK ................................. 0.896 251 225
1 The Pacific cod A season for trawl gear does not open until January 20.
2 The Pacific cod B season for trawl gear closes November 1.
The halibut PSC sideboard limits for halibut PSC by Amendment 80 Program slightly lower than the average historic
Amendment 80 Program vessels in the vessels in each PSC target category from use to accommodate two factors:
GOA are based on the historic use of 1998 through 2004. These values are Allocation of halibut PSC cooperative
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/19.svg)
![87900 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules
quota under the Rockfish Program and 2018 halibut PSC sideboard limits for sideboard limits that may be used by
the exemption of the F/V Golden Fleece Amendment 80 Program vessels. These Amendment 80 Program vessels, as
from this restriction (§ 679.92(b)(2)). tables incorporate the maximum contained in Table 38 to 50 CFR part
Table 19 lists the proposed 2017 and percentages of the halibut PSC 679.
TABLE 19—PROPOSED 2017 AND 2018 HALIBUT PSC SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AMENDMENT 80 PROGRAM VESSELS IN
THE GOA
[Values are rounded to the nearest metric ton]
Historic Proposed
Amendment 80 Proposed 2017 2017 and 2018
use of the and 2018 annual Amendment 80
Season Season dates Fishery category annual halibut PSC limit vessel PSC
PSC limit (mt) sideboard limit
(ratio) (mt)
1 ..................... January 20–April 1 ..................... shallow-water .............................. 0.0048 1,706 8
deep-water .................................. 0.0115 1,706 20
2 ..................... April 1–July 1 .............................. shallow-water .............................. 0.0189 1,706 32
deep-water .................................. 0.1072 1,706 183
3 ..................... July 1–September 1 ................... shallow-water .............................. 0.0146 1,706 25
deep-water .................................. 0.0521 1,706 89
4 ..................... September 1–October 1 ............. shallow-water .............................. 0.0074 1,706 13
deep-water .................................. 0.0014 1,706 2
5 ..................... October 1–December 31 ............ shallow-water .............................. 0.0227 1,706 39
deep-water .................................. 0.0371 1,706 63
Annual ..... ..................................................... Total shallow-water .................... ............................ ............................ 117
Total deep-water ........................ ............................ ............................ 357
Grand Total, all seasons and ............................ ............................ 474
categories.
Classification relevant TACs. The IRFA evaluated the For RFA purposes only, NMFS has
NMFS has determined that the impacts on small entities of alternative established a small business size
proposed harvest specifications are harvest strategies for the groundfish standard for businesses, including their
consistent with the FMP and fisheries in the EEZ off Alaska. As set affiliates, whose primary industry is
preliminarily determined that the forth in the methodology, TACs are set commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2).
proposed harvest specifications are to a level that fall within the range of A business primarily engaged in
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens ABCs recommended by the SSC; the commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411)
Act and other applicable laws, subject to sum of the TACs must achieve the OY is classified as a small business if it is
further review after public comment. specified in the FMP. While the specific independently owned and operated, is
This action is authorized under 50 numbers that the methodology produces not dominant in its field of operation
CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review may vary from year to year, the (including its affiliates), and has
under Executive Orders 12866 and methodology itself remains constant. combined annual receipts not in excess
13563. A description of the proposed action, of $11 million for all its affiliated
NMFS prepared an EIS for this action why it is being considered, and the legal operations worldwide.
and made it available to the public on The IRFA shows that, in 2015, there
basis for this proposed action are
January 12, 2007 (72 FR 1512). On were 969 individual CVs with gross
contained in the preamble above. A
February 13, 2007, NMFS issued the revenues less than or equal to $11
copy of the analysis is available from
Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final million. This estimate accounts for
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of
EIS. A Supplemental Information Report corporate affiliations among vessels, and
the IRFA follows.
(SIR) that assesses the need to prepare for cooperative affiliations among
The action under consideration is a fishing entities, since some of the
a Supplemental EIS is being prepared
for the final action. Copies of the Final harvest strategy to govern the catch of fishing vessels operating in the GOA are
EIS, ROD, and SIR for this action are groundfish in the GOA. The preferred members of AFA inshore pollock
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). alternative is the existing harvest cooperatives, GOA rockfish
The Final EIS analyzes the strategy in which TACs fall within the cooperatives, or BSAI Crab
environmental consequences of the range of ABCs recommended by the Rationalization Program cooperatives.
proposed groundfish harvest SSC. This action is taken in accordance Therefore, under the RFA, it is the
specifications and alternative harvest with the FMP prepared by the Council aggregate gross receipts of all
strategies on resources in the action pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act. participating members of the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
area. The Final EIS found no significant The entities directly regulated by this cooperative that must meet the ‘‘under
environmental consequences from the action are those that harvest groundfish $11 million’’ threshold. Vessels that
proposed action or its alternatives. in the EEZ of the GOA and in parallel participate in these cooperatives are
NMFS prepared an Initial Regulatory fisheries within State of Alaska waters. considered to be large entities within
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) as required These include entities operating CVs the meaning of the RFA. After
by section 603 of the Regulatory and C/Ps within the action area and accounting for membership in these
Flexibility Act (RFA), analyzing the entities receiving direct allocations of cooperatives, there are an estimated 969
methodology for establishing the groundfish. small CV entities remaining in the GOA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/20.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Proposed Rules 87901
groundfish sector. This latter group of practical implications that increased production. Thus, this alternative would
vessels had average gross revenues that TACs (where the sum of TACs equals have a detrimental impact on small
varied by gear type. Average gross the sum of ABCs) for some species entities.
revenues for hook-and-line CVs, pot probably would not be fully harvested. Alternative 5, which sets all harvests
gear vessels, and trawl gear vessels are This could be due to a lack of equal to zero, would have a significant
estimated to be $350,000, $760,000, and commercial or market interest in such adverse economic impact on small
$1.85 million, respectively. Revenue species. Additionally, an underharvest entities and would be contrary to
data for the three C/Ps considered to be of some TACs could result due to obligations to achieve OY on a
small entities are confidential. There are constraints such as the fixed, and continuing basis, as mandated by the
three C/Ps that are considered to be therefore constraining, PSC limits Magnuson-Stevens Act. Under
small entities; however, their revenue associated with the harvest of the GOA Alternative 5, all 969 individual CVs
data is confidential. groundfish species. impacted by this rule would have gross
The preferred alternative (Alternative Alternative 3 selects harvest rates
revenues of $0. Additionally, the three
2) was compared to four other based on the most recent 5 years of
small C/Ps impacted by this rule also
alternatives. Alternative 1 would have harvest rates (for species in Tiers 1
would have gross revenues of $0.
set TACs to generate fishing rates equal through 3) or for the most recent 5 years
to the maximum permissible ABC (if the of harvests (for species in Tiers 4 The proposed harvest specifications
full TAC were harvested), unless the through 6). This alternative is (Alternative 2) extend the current 2017
sum of TACs exceeded the GOA OY, in inconsistent with the objectives of this OFLs, ABCs, and TACs to 2017 and
which case TACs would be limited to action, the Council’s preferred harvest 2018. As noted in the IRFA, the Council
the OY. Alternative 3 would have set strategy, because it does not take may modify these OFLs, ABCs, and
TACs to produce fishing rates equal to account of the most recent biological TACs in December 2016, when it
the most recent 5-year average fishing information for this fishery. NMFS reviews the November 2016 SAFE
rate. Alternative 4 would have set TACs annually conducts at-sea stock surveys report from its Groundfish Plan Team,
to equal the lower limit of the GOA OY for different species, as well as and the December 2016 Council meeting
range. Alternative 5, the ‘‘no action statistical modeling, to estimate stock reports of its SSC and AP. Because the
alternative,’’ would have set TACs equal sizes and permissible harvest levels. 2017 TACs in the proposed 2017 and
to zero. Actual harvest rates or harvest amounts 2018 harvest specifications are
The TACs associated with the are a component of these estimates, but unchanged from the 2017 TACs, NMFS
preferred harvest strategy are those in and of themselves may not accurately does not expect adverse impacts on
adopted by the Council in October 2016, portray stock sizes and conditions. small entities. Also, NMFS does not
as per Alternative 2. OFLs and ABCs for Harvest rates are listed for each species expect any changes made by the Council
the species were based on category for each year in the SAFE in December 2016 to have significant
recommendations prepared by the report (see ADDRESSES). adverse impacts on small entities.
Council’s GOA Plan Team in September Alternative 4 would lead to This action does not modify
2016, and reviewed by the Council’s significantly lower harvests of all recordkeeping or reporting
SSC in October 2016. The Council based species and reduce the TACs from the requirements, or duplicate, overlap, or
its TAC recommendations on those of upper end of the OY range in the GOA, conflict with any Federal rules.
its AP, which were consistent with the to its lower end of 116,000 mt. Overall,
SSC’s OFL and ABC recommendations. this would reduce 2017 TACs by about Adverse impacts on marine mammals
Alternative 1 selects harvest rates that 80 percent and would lead to significant or endangered species resulting from
would allow fishermen to harvest stocks reductions in harvests of species fishing activities conducted under this
at the level of ABCs, unless total harvested by small entities. While rule are discussed in the Final EIS and
harvests were constrained by the upper reductions of this size would be its accompanying annual SIRs (see
bound of the GOA OY of 800,000 mt. As associated with offsetting price ADDRESSES).
shown in Table 1 of the preamble, the increases, the size of these increases is Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
sum of ABCs in 2017 and 2018 would very uncertain. There are close 1540(f); 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
be 708,629 mt, which falls below the substitutes for GOA groundfish species 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 105–277; Pub. L. 106–
upper bound of the OY range. The sum available in significant quantities from 31; Pub. L. 106–554; Pub. L. 108–199; Pub.
of TACs is 573,872 mt, which is less the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands L. 108–447; Pub. L. 109–241; Pub. L. 109–
479.
than the sum of ABCs. In this instance, management area. While production
Alternative 1 is consistent with the declines in the GOA would Dated: November 30, 2016.
preferred alternative (Alternative 2), undoubtedly be associated with Samuel D. Rauch III,
meets the objectives of that action, and significant price increases in the GOA, Deputy Assistant Administrator for
has small entity impacts that are these increases would still be Regulatory Programs, National Marine
equivalent to the preferred alternative. constrained by production of Fisheries Service.
In some instances, the selection of substitutes, and are very unlikely to [FR Doc. 2016–29150 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am]
Alternative 1 would not reflect the offset revenue declines from smaller BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06DEP1.SGM 06DEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88115/page/21.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-06 02:18:21
Document Modified: 2016-12-06 02:18:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule; request for comments. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by January 5, 2017. | |
| Contact | Obren Davis, 907-586-7228. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 87881 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-XE90 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR