81 FR 87958 - Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 234 (December 6, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 234 (December 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 87958-87964 | |
| FR Document | 2016-28521 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 234 (Tuesday, December 6, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 87958-87964] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-28521] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2016-0240] Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License amendment request; notice of opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order imposing procedures. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) received and is considering approval of two amendment requests. The amendment requests are for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; and Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3. For each amendment request, the NRC proposes to determine that they involve no significant hazards consideration. Because each amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non- safeguards information (SUNSI) an order imposes procedures to obtain access to SUNSI for contention preparation. DATES: Comments must be filed by January 5, 2017. A request for a hearing must be filed by February 6, 2017. Any potential party as defined in Sec. 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by December 16, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods.Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0240. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1384; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID facility name, unit number(s), plant docket number, application date, and subject when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0240. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in this document. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2016-0240, facility name, unit number(s), plant docket number, application date, and subject in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should [[Page 87959]] inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Background Pursuant to Section 189a.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), the NRC is publishing this notice. The Act requires the Commission to publish notice of any amendments issued, or proposed to be issued and grants the Commission the authority to issue and make immediately effective any amendment to an operating license or combined license, as applicable, upon a determination by the Commission that such amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, notwithstanding the pendency before the Commission of a request for a hearing from any person. This notice includes notices of amendments containing SUNSI. III. Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing The Commission has made a proposed determination that the following amendment requests involve no significant hazards consideration. Under the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The basis for this proposed determination for each amendment request is shown below. The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice will be considered in making any final determination. Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60- day period provided that its final determination is that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30- day comment period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility. If the Commission takes action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice period, it will publish a notice of issuance in the Federal Register. If the Commission makes a final no significant hazards consideration determination, any hearing will take place after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very infrequently. A. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To Intervene Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any persons (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a request for a hearing and a petition to intervene (petition) with respect to the action. Petitions shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at the NRC's PDR, located at One White Flint North, Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The NRC's regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on the NRC's Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a petition is filed within 60 days, the Commission or a presiding officer designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the petition; and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel will issue a notice of a hearing or an appropriate order. As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner; (2) the nature of the petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition must also set forth the specific contentions which the petitioner seeks to have litigated at the proceeding. Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert opinion to support its position on the issue. The petition must include sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the proceeding. The contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails to satisfy these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party. Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing with respect to resolution of that person's admitted contentions consistent with the NRC's regulations, policies, and procedures. Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. Requests for hearing, petitions for leave to intervene, and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that are filed after the 60-day deadline will not be entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). A State, local governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof, may submit a petition to the Commission to participate as a party under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition should state the nature and extent of the petitioner's interest in the proceeding. The petition should be submitted to the Commission by February 6, 2017. The petition must be filed in accordance with the filing [[Page 87960]] instructions in the ``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document, and should meet the requirements for petitions set forth in this section, except that under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local governmental body, or Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof does not need to address the standing requirements in 10 CFR 2.309(d) if the facility is located within its boundaries. A State, local governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof may also have the opportunity to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c). If a hearing is granted, any person who does not wish, or is not qualified, to become a party to the proceeding may, in the discretion of the presiding officer, be permitted to make a limited appearance pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person making a limited appearance may make an oral or written statement of position on the issues, but may not otherwise participate in the proceeding. A limited appearance may be made at any session of the hearing or at any prehearing conference, subject to the limits and conditions as may be imposed by the presiding officer. Details regarding the opportunity to make a limited appearance will be provided by the presiding officer if such sessions are scheduled. B. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene (hereinafter ``petition''), and documents filed by interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures described below. To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital identification (ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic docket. Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. System requirements for accessing the E-Submittal server are available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/adjudicatory-sub.html. Participants may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using unlisted software. Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then submit a petition. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format (PDF). Additional guidance on PDF submissions is available on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system. A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E- Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to [email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672- 7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m. and 7 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays. Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption request from using E- Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at http://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission of such information. However, in some instances, a petition will require including information on local residence in order to demonstrate a proximity assertion of interest in the proceeding. With respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested [[Page 87961]] not to include copyrighted materials in their submission. The Commission will issue a notice or order granting or denying a hearing request or intervention petition, designating the issues for any hearing that will be held and designating the Presiding Officer. A notice granting a hearing will be published in the Federal Register and served on the parties to the hearing. For further details with respect to these license amendment applications, see the application for amendment which is available for public inspection in ADAMS and at the NRC's PDR. For additional direction on accessing information related to this document, see the ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' section of this document. NextEra Energy, Point Beach, LLC, Docket No. 50-266, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin Date of amendment request: July 29, 2016. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16237A066. Description of amendment request: This amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguard information (SUNSI). The amendment would revise technical specification (TS) 3.4.13, RCS [Reactor Coolant System] Operational Leakage; TS 5.5.8, Steam Generator (SG) Program; and TS 5.6.8, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report, to exclude a portion of the tubes below the top of the SG tube sheet from periodic inspections and plugging. Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration which is presented below: 1. The proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS 5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 have no effect on accident probabilities or consequences. The previously analyzed accidents are initiated by the failure of plant structures, systems, or components. The proposed change that alters the steam generator (SG) inspection and reporting criteria does not have a detrimental impact on the integrity of any plant structure, system, or component that initiates an analyzed event. The proposed change will not alter the operation of, or otherwise increase the failure probability of any plant equipment that initiates an analyzed accident. Of the applicable accidents previously evaluated, the limiting transients with consideration to the proposed change to the SG tube inspection and repair criteria are: The steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) event, the steam line break (SLB), locked rotor and control rod ejection postulated accidents. Loss of Coolant Accident conditions cause a compressive load to act on a tube. This accident attempts to displace the tube into the tubesheet rather than pull it out, and, therefore, is not a factor in this amendment request. Another faulted load consideration is a safe shutdown earthquake; however, seismic analysis has shown that axial loading of the tubes is negligible during this event (Section 5.0 of Reference 10). Addressing the SGTR event, the required structural integrity margins of the SG tubes and the tube-to-tubesheet joint over the H* distance will be maintained. Tube rupture in tubes with cracks within the tubesheet is precluded by the constraint provided by the presence of the tubesheet and the tube-to-tubesheet joint. Tube burst cannot occur within the thickness of the tubesheet. The tube- to-tubesheet joint constraint results from the hydraulic expansion process, thermal expansion mismatch between the tube and tubesheet, from the differential pressure between the primary and secondary side, and tubesheet rotation. Based on this design, the structural margins against burst/tube pullout, as discussed in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, ``Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR [pressurized-water reactor] Steam Generator Tubes,'' and TS 5.5.8 are maintained for both normal and postulated accident conditions. The final H* distance to preclude tube pullout from the tubesheet at 0.95 probability at 95% confidence is 20.60 inches. The proposed change has no impact on the structural or leakage integrity of the portion of the tube outside of the tubesheet. The proposed change maintains structural and leakage integrity of the SG tubes consistent with the performance criteria in TS 5.5.8. Therefore, the proposed change results in no significant increase in the probability of the occurrence of a SGTR accident. At normal operating pressures, leakage from tube degradation below the proposed limited inspection depth is limited by the tube- to-tubesheet crevice. Consequently, negligible normal operating leakage is expected from degradation below the inspected depth within the tubesheet region. The consequences of an SGTR event are not affected by the primary-to-secondary leakage flow during the event as primary-to-secondary leakage flow through a postulated tube that has been pulled out of the tubesheet is essentially equivalent to a severed tube. Therefore, the proposed change does not result in a significant increase in the consequences of a SGTR. Concerning a postulated SLB event, NextEra will apply a leakage factor of 5.22 to the normal operating leakage associated with the tubesheet expansion region in the condition monitoring (CM) and operational assessment (OA). The leakage factor of 5.22 is a bounding value for all SGs, both hot and cold legs. The accident- induced leak rate limit for Point Beach Unit 1 is 500 gpd [gallons per day] at accident conditions. As a result, the TS operational leak rate limit is reduced from 150 gpd to 72 gpd through any one steam generator to help to ensure that accident induced leakage in excess of SLB accident analysis assumptions will not occur. For the CM assessment, the component of leakage from the prior cycle from below the H* distance will be multiplied by a factor of 5.22 and added to the total leakage from any other source and compared to the allowable accident induced leakage limit. For the OA, the difference in the leakage between the allowable leakage and the accident induced leakage from sources other than the tubesheet expansion region will be divided by 5.22 and compared to the observed operational leakage. No leakage factor will be applied to the locked rotor or control rod ejection transients due to their short duration. Based on the above, the proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. The proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS 5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 that alter the SG inspection and reporting criteria do not introduce any new equipment, create new failure modes for existing equipment, or create any new limiting single failures. Plant operation will not be altered, and all safety functions will continue to perform as previously assumed in accident analyses. Tube bundle integrity is maintained for all plant conditions upon implementation of the permanent alternate repair criteria. Therefore, based on the above, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. 3. The proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety. The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS 5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 define the safety significant portion of the tube that must be inspected and repaired. WCAP-18089-P identifies the specific inspection depth from the top of the tubesheet below which any type of tube degradation is shown to have no impact on the performance criteria in NEI 97-06 Rev. 3, ``Steam Generator Program Guidelines.'' The proposed change that alters the SG inspection and reporting criteria maintains the required structural margins of the SG tubes for both normal and accident conditions. Nuclear Energy Institute 97-06, ``Steam Generator Program Guidelines,'' and NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, ``Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes'' are used as the bases in the development of the limited tubesheet inspection depth methodology for determining that SG tube integrity considerations are maintained within acceptable limits. RG 1.121 describes a method acceptable to the NRC for meeting General Design Criteria (GDC) 14, ``Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' GDC 15, ``Reactor Coolant System Design,'' GDC 31, ``Fracture Prevention of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' and GDC 32, ``Inspection of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,'' by reducing the probability and consequences of a SGTR. RG 1.121 concludes that by determining the limiting safe conditions for tube wall degradation, the probability and consequences of a SGTR are [[Page 87962]] reduced. This RG uses safety factors on loads for tube burst that are consistent with the requirements of Section III of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code. For axially oriented cracking located within the tubesheet, tube burst is precluded due to the presence of the tubesheet. For circumferentially oriented cracking, Westinghouse WCAP-18089-P defines a length of degradation-free expanded tubing that provides the necessary resistance to tube pullout due to the pressure induced forces, with applicable safety factors applied. Application of the limited hot and cold leg tubesheet inspection criteria will preclude unacceptable primary-to-secondary leakage during all plant conditions. Using the methodology for determining leakage as described in WCAP-18089-P, it is shown that significant adequate margin exists between conservatively estimated accident induced leakage and the allowable accident leakage (500 gpd at operating conditions) if either SG is assumed to be leaking at the TS leakage limit of 72 gpd at the beginning of the design basis accident. Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in any margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: William Blair, Managing Attorney--Nuclear, Florida Power & Light Company, P. O. Box 14000, 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408-0420. NRC Branch Chief: David J. Wrona. South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South Carolina Date of amendment request: September 20, 2016. A publicly-available version is in ADAMS under Accession No. ML16267A163. Description of amendment request: This amendment request contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI). The amendment request proposes changes to the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) in the form of departures from the incorporated plant- specific Design Control Document Tier 2* information. Specifically, the proposed change clarifies in the UFSAR how the quality and strength of a specific set of couplers welded to stainless steel embedment plates already installed and embedded in concrete are demonstrated through visual examination and static tension testing, in lieu of the nondestructive examination requirements of American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) N690, ``Specification for Safety-Related Steel Structures for Nuclear Facilities.'' Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below: 1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed change describes how evaluation of coupler strength, and by extension, weld strength and quality are used to demonstrate the capacity of partial joint penetration (PJP) welds joining weldable couplers to stainless steel embedment plates as being able to perform their design function in lieu of satisfying the AISC N690-1994, Section Q1.26.2.2, Section Q1.26.2.3, and Section Q1.26.3 requirements for non-destructive examination (NDE) on 10 percent weld populations, reexamination, and repair, respectively. The proposed change does not affect the operation of any systems or equipment that initiate an analyzed accident or alter any structures, systems, and components (SSCs) accident initiator or initiating sequence of events. The change has no adverse effect on the design function of the mechanical couplers or the SSCs to which the mechanical couplers are welded. The probabilities of the accidents evaluated in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) are not affected. The change does not impact the support, design, or operation of mechanical and fluid systems. The change does not impact the support, design, or operation of any safety-related structures. There is no change to plant systems or the response of systems to postulated accident conditions. There is no change to the predicted radioactive releases due to normal operation or postulated accident conditions. The plant response to previously evaluated accidents or external events is not adversely affected, nor does the proposed change create any new accident precursors. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. 2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? Response: No. The proposed change describes how evaluation of coupler strength, and by extension, weld strength and quality are used to demonstrate the capacity of PJP welds joining weldable couplers to stainless steel embedment plates as being able to perform their design function in lieu of satisfying the AISC N690-1994, Section Q1.26.2.2, Section Q1.26.2.3, and Section Q1.26.3 requirements for non-destructive examination on 10 percent weld populations, reexamination, and repair, respectively. The proposed change does not affect the operation of any systems or equipment that may initiate a new or different kind of accident, or alter any SSC such that a new accident initiator or initiating sequence of events is created. The proposed change does not adversely affect the design function of the mechanical couplers, the structures in which the couplers are used, or any other SSC design functions or methods of operation in a manner that results in a new failure mode, malfunction, or sequence of events that affect safety-related or nonsafety-related equipment. This activity does not allow for a new fission product release path, result in a new fission product barrier failure mode, or create a new sequence of events that result in significant fuel cladding failures. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated. 3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? Response: No. The proposed change describes how evaluation of coupler strength, and by extension, weld strength and quality are used to demonstrate the capacity of the PJP welds joining weldable couplers to stainless steel embedment plates as being able to perform their design function in lieu of satisfying the AISC N690-1994, Section Q1.26.2.2, Section Q1.26.2.3, and Section Q1.26.3 requirements for non-destructive examination on 10 percent weld populations, reexamination, and repair, respectively. The proposed change satisfies the same design functions as stated in the UFSAR. This change does not adversely affect compliance with any design function, design analysis, safety analysis input or result, or design/safety margin. No safety analysis or design basis acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or exceeded by the proposed change. Because no safety analysis or design basis acceptance limit/ criterion is challenged or exceeded by this change, no significant margin of safety is reduced. Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Attorney for licensee: Kathryn M. Sutton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLC, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004-2514. NRC Branch Chief: Michael T. Markley. [[Page 87963]] Order Imposing Procedures for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non- Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation NextEra Energy, Point Beach, LLC, Docket No. 50-266, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) Units 2 and 3, Fairfield County, South Carolina A. This Order contains instructions regarding how potential parties to this proceeding may request access to documents containing SUNSI. B. Within 10 days after publication of this notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, any potential party who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice may request such access. A ``potential party'' is any person who intends to participate as a party by demonstrating standing and filing an admissible contention under 10 CFR 2.309. Requests for access to SUNSI submitted later than 10 days after publication of this notice will not be considered absent a showing of good cause for the late filing, addressing why the request could not have been filed earlier. C. The requester shall submit a letter requesting permission to access SUNSI to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, and provide a copy to the Associate General Counsel for Hearings, Enforcement and Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The expedited delivery or courier mail address for both offices is: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The email address for the Office of the Secretary and the Office of the General Counsel are [email protected] and [email protected], respectively.\1\ The request must include the following information: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ While a request for hearing or petition to intervene in this proceeding must comply with the filing requirements of the NRC's ``E-Filing Rule,'' the initial request to access SUNSI under these procedures should be submitted as described in this paragraph. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) A description of the licensing action with a citation to this Federal Register notice; (2) The name and address of the potential party and a description of the potential party's particularized interest that could be harmed by the action identified in C.(1); and (3) The identity of the individual or entity requesting access to SUNSI and the requester's basis for the need for the information in order to meaningfully participate in this adjudicatory proceeding. In particular, the request must explain why publicly-available versions of the information requested would not be sufficient to provide the basis and specificity for a proffered contention. D. Based on an evaluation of the information submitted under paragraph C.(3) the NRC staff will determine within 10 days of receipt of the request whether: (1) There is a reasonable basis to believe the petitioner is likely to establish standing to participate in this NRC proceeding; and (2) The requestor has established a legitimate need for access to SUNSI. E. If the NRC staff determines that the requestor satisfies both D.(1) and D.(2) above, the NRC staff will notify the requestor in writing that access to SUNSI has been granted. The written notification will contain instructions on how the requestor may obtain copies of the requested documents, and any other conditions that may apply to access to those documents. These conditions may include, but are not limited to, the signing of a Non-Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit, or Protective Order\2\ setting forth terms and conditions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of SUNSI by each individual who will be granted access to SUNSI. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Any motion for Protective Order or draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit or Agreement for SUNSI must be filed with the presiding officer or the Chief Administrative Judge if the presiding officer has not yet been designated, within 30 days of the deadline for the receipt of the written access request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F. Review of Denials of Access. (1) If the request for access to SUNSI is denied by the NRC staff after a determination on standing and need for access, the NRC staff shall immediately notify the requestor in writing, briefly stating the reason or reasons for the denial. (2) The requester may challenge the NRC staff's adverse determination by filing a challenge within 5 days of receipt of that determination with: (a) the presiding officer designated in this proceeding; (b) if no presiding officer has been appointed, the Chief Administrative Judge, or if he or she is unavailable, another administrative judge, or an administrative law judge with jurisdiction pursuant to 10 CFR 2.318(a); or (c) an officer if that officer has been designated to rule on information access issues. G. Review of Grants of Access. A party other than the requester may challenge an NRC staff determination granting access to SUNSI whose release would harm that party's interest independent of the proceeding. Such a challenge must be filed with the Chief Administrative Judge within 5 days of the notification by the NRC staff of its grant of access. If challenges to the NRC staff determinations are filed, these procedures give way to the normal process for litigating disputes concerning access to information. The availability of interlocutory review by the Commission of orders ruling on such NRC staff determinations (whether granting or denying access) is governed by 10 CFR 2.311.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Requesters should note that the filing requirements of the NRC's E-Filing Rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012) apply to appeals of NRC staff determinations (because they must be served on a presiding officer or the Commission, as applicable), but not to the initial SUNSI request submitted to the NRC staff under these procedures. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- H. The Commission expects that the NRC staff and presiding officers (and any other reviewing officers) will consider and resolve requests for access to SUNSI, and motions for protective orders, in a timely fashion in order to minimize any unnecessary delays in identifying those petitioners who have standing and who have proposed contentions meeting the specificity and basis requirements in 10 CFR part 2. Attachment 1 to this Order summarizes the general target schedule for processing and resolving requests under these procedures. It is so ordered. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd day of November, 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [[Page 87964]] Attachment 1--General Target Schedule for Processing and Resolving Requests for Access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information in This Proceeding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Day Event/Activity ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0................... Publication of Federal Register notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, including order with instructions for access requests. 10.................. Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information: supporting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order for the potential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding. 60.................. Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) demonstration of standing; and (ii) all contentions whose formulation does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 petitioner/requestor reply). 20.................. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requester of the staff's determination whether the request for access provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents). 25.................. If NRC staff finds no ``need'' or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for petitioner/requester to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff's denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ``need'' for SUNSI, the deadline for any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff's grant of access. 30.................. Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). 40.................. (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and file motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure Agreement for SUNSI. A................... If access granted: issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. A + 3............... Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. A + 28.............. Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner's receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. A + 53.............. (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. A + 60.............. (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. >A + 60............. Decision on contention admission. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [FR Doc. 2016-28521 Filed 12-5-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![87958 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices
Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office NUCLEAR REGULATORY SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
of Justice Programs. COMMISSION this document.
(4) Affected public who will be asked FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[NRC–2016–0240]
or required to respond, as well as a brief Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear
abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal Applications and Amendments to Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Government. Other: Federal Facility Operating Licenses and Regulatory Commission, Washington,
Government and business (privately Combined Licenses Involving DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
operated correctional institutions, both Proposed No Significant Hazards 1384; email: Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov.
for-profit and not-for-profit). The data Considerations and Containing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
will be used to develop estimates for the Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards I. Obtaining Information and
incidence and prevalence of sexual Information and Order Imposing Submitting Comments
assault within correctional facilities, as Procedures for Access to Sensitive
Unclassified Non-Safeguards A. Obtaining Information
well as characteristics of substantiated
Information Please refer to Docket ID facility
incidents, as required under the Prison
Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (Pub. L. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory name, unit number(s), plant docket
108–79). Commission. number, application date, and subject
ACTION: License amendment request;
when contacting the NRC about the
(5) An estimate of the total number of availability of information for this
respondents and the amount of time notice of opportunity to comment,
request a hearing, and petition for leave action. You may obtain publicly-
estimated for an average respondent to available information related to this
respond: An estimate of the total to intervene; order imposing
procedures. action by any of the following methods:
number of respondents is 1,538 adult • Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
and juvenile systems and facilities. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory http://www.regulations.gov and search
(This estimate assumes a response rate Commission (NRC) received and is for Docket ID NRC–2016–0240.
of 100%.) Federal and state systems for considering approval of two amendment • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
adults and juveniles (102 respondents) requests. The amendment requests are Access and Management System
will take an estimated 60 minutes to for Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-
complete the summary form; local and and Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, available documents online in the
privately operated facilities (1,426 Units 2 and 3. For each amendment ADAMS Public Documents collection at
respondents) will take an estimated 30 request, the NRC proposes to determine http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
minutes to complete the summary form; that they involve no significant hazards adams.html. To begin the search, select
and each incident form (we estimate consideration. Because each amendment ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
about 2,000 incident forms will be request contains sensitive unclassified select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
completed, one for each incident that non-safeguards information (SUNSI) an Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
was substantiated) will take about 30 order imposes procedures to obtain please contact the NRC’s Public
minutes. The annual burden estimates access to SUNSI for contention Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
preparation. 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
are based on data from the prior
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
administration of the SSV. DATES: Comments must be filed by ADAMS accession number for each
(6) An estimate of the total public January 5, 2017. A request for a hearing document referenced (if it is available in
burden (in hours) associated with the must be filed by February 6, 2017. Any ADAMS) is provided the first time that
collection: The annual total burden potential party as defined in § 2.4 of title it is mentioned in this document.
hours associated with this collection is 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
estimated to be 1,815. (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI purchase copies of public documents at
is necessary to respond to this notice the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
If additional information is required must request document access by
contact: Jerri Murray, Department White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
December 16, 2016. Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Clearance Officer, United States ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
Department of Justice, Justice by any of the following methods. B. Submitting Comments
Management Division, Policy and • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to Please include Docket ID NRC–2016–
Planning Staff, Two Constitution http://www.regulations.gov and search 0240, facility name, unit number(s),
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, for Docket ID NRC–2016–0240. Address plant docket number, application date,
Washington, DC 20530. questions about NRC dockets to Carol and subject in your comment
Dated: December 1, 2016. Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; submission.
Jerri Murray, email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For The NRC cautions you not to include
technical questions, contact the identifying or contact information that
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER you do not want to be publicly
Department of Justice.
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this disclosed in your comment submission.
[FR Doc. 2016–29166 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am]
document. The NRC will post all comment
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, submissions at http://
Office of Administration, Mail Stop: www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear comment submissions into ADAMS.
Regulatory Commission, Washington, The NRC does not routinely edit
DC 20555–0001. comment submissions to remove
For additional direction on obtaining identifying or contact information.
information and submitting comments, If you are requesting or aggregating
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and comments from other persons for
Submitting Comments’’ in the submission to the NRC, then you should
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88192/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices 87961
not to include copyrighted materials in The steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) For the CM assessment, the component of
their submission. event, the steam line break (SLB), locked leakage from the prior cycle from below the
The Commission will issue a notice or rotor and control rod ejection postulated H* distance will be multiplied by a factor of
order granting or denying a hearing accidents. Loss of Coolant Accident 5.22 and added to the total leakage from any
conditions cause a compressive load to act on other source and compared to the allowable
request or intervention petition, a tube. This accident attempts to displace the accident induced leakage limit. For the OA,
designating the issues for any hearing tube into the tubesheet rather than pull it out, the difference in the leakage between the
that will be held and designating the and, therefore, is not a factor in this allowable leakage and the accident induced
Presiding Officer. A notice granting a amendment request. Another faulted load leakage from sources other than the tubesheet
hearing will be published in the Federal consideration is a safe shutdown earthquake; expansion region will be divided by 5.22 and
Register and served on the parties to the however, seismic analysis has shown that compared to the observed operational
hearing. axial loading of the tubes is negligible during leakage.
For further details with respect to this event (Section 5.0 of Reference 10). No leakage factor will be applied to the
Addressing the SGTR event, the required locked rotor or control rod ejection transients
these license amendment applications, structural integrity margins of the SG tubes due to their short duration.
see the application for amendment and the tube-to-tubesheet joint over the H* Based on the above, the proposed changes
which is available for public inspection distance will be maintained. Tube rupture in do not involve a significant increase in the
in ADAMS and at the NRC’s PDR. For tubes with cracks within the tubesheet is probability or consequences of an accident
additional direction on accessing precluded by the constraint provided by the previously evaluated.
information related to this document, presence of the tubesheet and the tube-to- 2. The proposed changes do not create the
see the ‘‘Obtaining Information and tubesheet joint. Tube burst cannot occur possibility of a new or different kind of
within the thickness of the tubesheet. The accident from any previously evaluated.
Submitting Comments’’ section of this tube-to-tubesheet joint constraint results from
document. The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS
the hydraulic expansion process, thermal 5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 that alter the SG
NextEra Energy, Point Beach, LLC, expansion mismatch between the tube and inspection and reporting criteria do not
tubesheet, from the differential pressure introduce any new equipment, create new
Docket No. 50–266, Point Beach Nuclear
between the primary and secondary side, and failure modes for existing equipment, or
Plant, Unit 1, Town of Two Creeks, tubesheet rotation. Based on this design, the
Manitowoc County, Wisconsin create any new limiting single failures. Plant
structural margins against burst/tube pullout, operation will not be altered, and all safety
Date of amendment request: July 29, as discussed in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, functions will continue to perform as
2016. A publicly-available version is in ‘‘Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR previously assumed in accident analyses.
[pressurized-water reactor] Steam Generator
ADAMS under Accession No. Tubes,’’ and TS 5.5.8 are maintained for both
Tube bundle integrity is maintained for all
ML16237A066. plant conditions upon implementation of the
normal and postulated accident conditions.
Description of amendment request: permanent alternate repair criteria.
The final H* distance to preclude tube
This amendment request contains Therefore, based on the above, the
pullout from the tubesheet at 0.95 probability
sensitive unclassified non-safeguard proposed change does not create the
at 95% confidence is 20.60 inches.
possibility of a new or different kind of
information (SUNSI). The amendment The proposed change has no impact on the
accident from any previously evaluated.
would revise technical specification structural or leakage integrity of the portion
of the tube outside of the tubesheet. The 3. The proposed changes do not involve a
(TS) 3.4.13, RCS [Reactor Coolant significant reduction in the margin of safety.
proposed change maintains structural and
System] Operational Leakage; TS 5.5.8, The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS
leakage integrity of the SG tubes consistent
Steam Generator (SG) Program; and TS with the performance criteria in TS 5.5.8. 5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 define the safety
5.6.8, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Therefore, the proposed change results in no significant portion of the tube that must be
Report, to exclude a portion of the tubes significant increase in the probability of the inspected and repaired. WCAP–18089–P
below the top of the SG tube sheet from occurrence of a SGTR accident. identifies the specific inspection depth from
periodic inspections and plugging. At normal operating pressures, leakage the top of the tubesheet below which any
from tube degradation below the proposed type of tube degradation is shown to have no
Basis for proposed no significant
limited inspection depth is limited by the impact on the performance criteria in NEI
hazards consideration determination: 97–06 Rev. 3, ‘‘Steam Generator Program
As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the tube-to-tubesheet crevice. Consequently,
negligible normal operating leakage is Guidelines.’’
licensee has provided its analysis of the The proposed change that alters the SG
expected from degradation below the
issue of no significant hazards inspected depth within the tubesheet region. inspection and reporting criteria maintains
consideration which is presented below: The consequences of an SGTR event are not the required structural margins of the SG
1. The proposed changes do not involve a affected by the primary-to-secondary leakage tubes for both normal and accident
significant increase in the probability or flow during the event as primary-to- conditions. Nuclear Energy Institute 97–06,
consequences of an accident previously secondary leakage flow through a postulated ‘‘Steam Generator Program Guidelines,’’ and
evaluated. tube that has been pulled out of the tubesheet NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.121, ‘‘Bases for
The proposed changes to TS 3.4.13, TS is essentially equivalent to a severed tube. Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator
5.5.8, and TS 5.6.8 have no effect on accident Therefore, the proposed change does not Tubes’’ are used as the bases in the
probabilities or consequences. The result in a significant increase in the development of the limited tubesheet
previously analyzed accidents are initiated consequences of a SGTR. inspection depth methodology for
by the failure of plant structures, systems, or Concerning a postulated SLB event, determining that SG tube integrity
components. The proposed change that alters NextEra will apply a leakage factor of 5.22 to considerations are maintained within
the steam generator (SG) inspection and the normal operating leakage associated with acceptable limits. RG 1.121 describes a
reporting criteria does not have a detrimental the tubesheet expansion region in the method acceptable to the NRC for meeting
impact on the integrity of any plant structure, condition monitoring (CM) and operational General Design Criteria (GDC) 14, ‘‘Reactor
system, or component that initiates an assessment (OA). The leakage factor of 5.22 Coolant Pressure Boundary,’’ GDC 15,
analyzed event. The proposed change will is a bounding value for all SGs, both hot and ‘‘Reactor Coolant System Design,’’ GDC 31,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
not alter the operation of, or otherwise cold legs. The accident-induced leak rate ‘‘Fracture Prevention of Reactor Coolant
increase the failure probability of any plant limit for Point Beach Unit 1 is 500 gpd Pressure Boundary,’’ and GDC 32,
equipment that initiates an analyzed [gallons per day] at accident conditions. As ‘‘Inspection of Reactor Coolant Pressure
accident. a result, the TS operational leak rate limit is Boundary,’’ by reducing the probability and
Of the applicable accidents previously reduced from 150 gpd to 72 gpd through any consequences of a SGTR. RG 1.121 concludes
evaluated, the limiting transients with one steam generator to help to ensure that that by determining the limiting safe
consideration to the proposed change to the accident induced leakage in excess of SLB conditions for tube wall degradation, the
SG tube inspection and repair criteria are: accident analysis assumptions will not occur. probability and consequences of a SGTR are
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88192/page/4.svg)
![87964 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 6, 2016 / Notices
ATTACHMENT 1—GENERAL TARGET SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING AND RESOLVING REQUESTS FOR ACCESS TO SENSITIVE
UNCLASSIFIED NON-SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION IN THIS PROCEEDING
Day Event/Activity
0 ........... Publication of FEDERAL REGISTER notice of hearing and opportunity to petition for leave to intervene, including order with instructions
for access requests.
10 ......... Deadline for submitting requests for access to Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI) with information: sup-
porting the standing of a potential party identified by name and address; describing the need for the information in order for the po-
tential party to participate meaningfully in an adjudicatory proceeding.
60 ......... Deadline for submitting petition for intervention containing: (i) demonstration of standing; and (ii) all contentions whose formulation
does not require access to SUNSI (+25 Answers to petition for intervention; +7 petitioner/requestor reply).
20 ......... U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requester of the staff’s determination whether the request for access
provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows need for SUNSI. (NRC staff also informs any party
to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information.) If NRC staff
makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins document processing (preparation of redactions
or review of redacted documents).
25 ......... If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for petitioner/requester to file a motion seeking a ruling to re-
verse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administra-
tive Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline for any party to the pro-
ceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information to file a motion seeking a
ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access.
30 ......... Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s).
40 ......... (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and file mo-
tion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure Agreement for
SUNSI.
A ........... If access granted: issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sen-
sitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse de-
termination by the NRC staff.
A + 3 .... Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order.
A + 28 .. Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain
between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in
the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline.
A + 53 .. (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI.
A + 60 .. (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers.
>A + 60 Decision on contention admission.
[FR Doc. 2016–28521 Filed 12–5–16; 8:45 am] consideration, notwithstanding the For additional direction on obtaining
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P pendency before the Commission of a information and submitting comments,
request for a hearing from any person. see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
This biweekly notice includes all Submitting Comments’’ in the
NUCLEAR REGULATORY notices of amendments issued, or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
COMMISSION proposed to be issued, from November this document.
8 to November 21, 2016. The last FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[NRC–2016–0245] biweekly notice was published on Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear
November 22, 2016. Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Biweekly Notice; Applications and
DATES: Comments must be filed by
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
Amendments to Facility Operating
January 5, 2017. A request for a hearing DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
Licenses and Combined Licenses
1384, email: Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov.
Involving No Significant Hazards must be filed by February 6, 2017.
Considerations ADDRESSES: You may submit comments I. Obtaining Information and
by any of the following methods (unless Submitting Comments
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. this document describes a different A. Obtaining Information
method for submitting comments on a
ACTION: Biweekly notice. Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2016–
specific subject):
0245, facility name, unit number(s),
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 189a.(2) • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to plant docket number, application date,
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as http://www.regulations.gov and search and subject when contacting the NRC
amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear for Docket ID NRC–2016–0245. Address about the availability of information for
Regulatory Commission (NRC) is questions about NRC dockets to Carol this action. You may obtain publicly-
publishing this regular biweekly notice. Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; available information related to this
The Act requires the Commission to email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For action by any of the following methods:
publish notice of any amendments technical questions, contact the • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
issued, or proposed to be issued, and individual listed in the FOR FURTHER http://www.regulations.gov and search
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
grants the Commission the authority to INFORMATION CONTACT section of this for Docket ID NRC–2016–0245.
issue and make immediately effective document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents
any amendment to an operating license • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Access and Management System
or combined license, as applicable, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-
upon a determination by the OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear available documents online in the
Commission that such amendment Regulatory Commission, Washington, ADAMS Public Documents collection at
involves no significant hazards DC 20555–0001. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 05, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_88192/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2016-12-06 02:19:01
Document Modified: 2016-12-06 02:19:01
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | License amendment request; notice of opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order imposing procedures. | |
| Dates | Comments must be filed by January 5, 2017. A request for a hearing must be filed by February 6, 2017. Any potential party as defined in Sec. 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by December 16, 2016. | |
| Contact | Janet Burkhardt, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1384; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 87958 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR