81 FR 8841 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Acushnet River, New Bedford and Fairhaven, MA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 35 (February 23, 2016)

Page Range		8841-8843
FR Document		2016-03789

The Coast Guard is making a correction to the operating schedule that governs the New Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge, mile 0.0, across the Acushnet River, between New Bedford and Fairhaven, MA. On July 1, 2013, a technical amendment was published that updated the name of the bridge, however, the requested correction was drafted incorrectly and three subparagraphs were inadvertently removed from the section.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8841-8843]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0058]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Acushnet River, New Bedford and 
Fairhaven, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is making a correction to the operating 
schedule that governs the New Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge, mile 0.0, 
across the Acushnet River, between New Bedford and Fairhaven, MA. On 
July 1, 2013, a technical amendment was published that updated the name 
of the bridge, however, the requested correction was drafted 
incorrectly and three subparagraphs were inadvertently removed from the 
section.

DATES: This rule is effective February 23, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type [USCG-
2016-0058]. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Mr. Christopher J. Bisignano, Supervisory Bridge 
Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District, Coast Guard; 
telephone (212) 514-4331 or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    Each year on July 1, the printed edition of Title 33 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) is recodified. On July 1, 2013, the Coast 
Guard published a Final Rule entitled, ``Navigation and Navigable 
Waters; Technical, Organizational, and Conforming Amendments'' in the 
Federal Register (78 FR 39163). This 2013 rule made technical and 
editorial corrections throughout Title 33 but did not create any 
substantive requirements. In this rule the Coast Guard requested that 
the term ``drawspan'' be replaced with the actual name of the bridge 
(New Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge) in 33 CFR 117.585(a). However, 
misinterpretation of the asterisks in the regulatory text, which were 
used to denote that all paragraphs and subordinate paragraphs after 
paragraph (a) in Sec.  117.585 were to remain unchanged, caused the 
subparagraphs (1) through (3) to be removed.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to

[[Page 8842]]

comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are 
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for 
not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to 
this rule because the publishing of the Final Rule entitled, 
``Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and 
Conforming Amendments,'' in the Federal Register (78 FR 39163) on July 
1, 2013, inadvertently removed established regulatory language. The 
three subparagraphs under 33 CFR 117.585(a) were inadvertently removed 
from the CFR. Therefore, it is unnecessary to issue a rule without 
prior notice and opportunity to comment.
    We are issuing this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less 
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register for the same 
reasons as stated above.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
    The purpose of this rule is to correct an error that occurred in 
the publication of the Final Rule on July 1, 2013, entitled, 
``Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical, Organizational, and 
Conforming Amendments,'' in the Federal Register (78 FR 39163). The use 
of the asterisks in the regulatory text were misinterpreted causing 
subparagraphs (1) through (3) to be inadvertently removed from 33 CFR 
117.585(a).
    The New Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge remains an active bridge and 
subparagraph's (1) through (3) contain the actual operating schedule 
for the bridge. The bridge continues to operate under that schedule and 
the subparagraphs need to be reinserted into 33 CFR 117.585(a) to 
inform the public of the legal operating schedule of the bridge.

IV. Discussion of Final Rule

    This rule will correct 33 CFR 117.585(a) by restoring subparagraphs 
(1) through (3) which contain the actual operating schedule for the New 
Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge. As paragraph (a) is currently codified 
in the rule, there is only the introductory language. This language by 
itself does not explain to the public the operating schedule for the 
bridge. The intention of this rule is to restore the operating language 
to 33 CFR 117.585(a) as it appeared immediately prior to the July 1, 
2013, codification of 33 CFR.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    The Coast Guard does not consider this rule to be ``significant'' 
under that Order because it corrects inadvertently omitted language 
that is consistent with the current operation of the bridge. Therefore, 
this rule does not affect the way vessels operate on the waterway near 
and through the bridge.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A. 
above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator. While the operating schedule was 
inadvertently removed from the rule, the bridge continues to operate as 
it had prior to the removal of the operating schedule in the CFR.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we

[[Page 8843]]

do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or 
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from 
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the 
Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an 
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are not required for this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the For Further 
Information Contact section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Revise Sec.  117.585(a) to read as follows:


Sec.  117.585  Acushnet River.

    (a) The New Bedford-Fairhaven RT-6 Bridge, mile 0.0 will be opened 
promptly, provided proper signal is given, on the following schedule:
    (1) On the hour between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. inclusive.
    (2) At a quarter past the hour between 11:15 a.m. and 6:15 p.m. 
inclusive.
    (3) At all other times on call.
* * * * *

    Dated: February 8, 2016.
L.L. Fagan,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2016-03789 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

8842 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

comment when the agency for good V. Regulatory Analyses organization, or governmental
cause finds that those procedures are We developed this rule after jurisdiction and you have questions
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary considering numerous statutes and concerning its provisions or options for
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. Executive Orders related to rulemaking. compliance, please contact the person
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good Below we summarize our analyses listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
cause exists for not publishing a notice based on a number of these statutes and CONTACT, above. Small businesses may
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with send comments on the actions of
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
respect to this rule because the Federal employees who enforce, or
Amendment rights of protesters.
publishing of the Final Rule entitled, otherwise determine compliance with,
‘‘Navigation and Navigable Waters; A. Regulatory Planning and Review Federal regulations to the Small
Technical, Organizational, and Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Conforming Amendments,’’ in the direct agencies to assess the costs and Enforcement Ombudsman and the
Federal Register (78 FR 39163) on July benefits of available regulatory Regional Small Business Regulatory
1, 2013, inadvertently removed alternatives and, if regulation is Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
established regulatory language. The necessary, to select regulatory evaluates these actions annually and
three subparagraphs under 33 CFR approaches that maximize net benefits. rates each agency’s responsiveness to
117.585(a) were inadvertently removed small business. If you wish to comment
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
from the CFR. Therefore, it is on actions by employees of the Coast
importance of quantifying both costs
unnecessary to issue a rule without Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
prior notice and opportunity to 734–3247). The Coast Guard will not
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
comment. retaliate against small entities that
flexibility. This rule has not been
We are issuing this rule under 5 question or complain about this rule or
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
that good cause exists for making this
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed C. Collection of Information
rule effective in less than 30 days after
by the Office of Management and This rule calls for no new collection
publication in the Federal Register for
Budget. of information under the Paperwork
the same reasons as stated above.
The Coast Guard does not consider Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule this rule to be ‘‘significant’’ under that 3520).
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule Order because it corrects inadvertently
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499. omitted language that is consistent with D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
The purpose of this rule is to correct the current operation of the bridge. Government
an error that occurred in the publication Therefore, this rule does not affect the A rule has implications for federalism
of the Final Rule on July 1, 2013, way vessels operate on the waterway under Executive Order 13132,
entitled, ‘‘Navigation and Navigable near and through the bridge. Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
Waters; Technical, Organizational, and B. Impact on Small Entities effect on the States, on the relationship
Conforming Amendments,’’ in the between the national government and
Federal Register (78 FR 39163). The use The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 the States, or on the distribution of
of the asterisks in the regulatory text (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, power and responsibilities among the
were misinterpreted causing requires federal agencies to consider the various levels of government. We have
subparagraphs (1) through (3) to be potential impact of regulations on small analyzed this rule under that Order and
inadvertently removed from 33 CFR entities during rulemaking. The term have determined that it is consistent
117.585(a). ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small with the fundamental federalism
The New Bedford-Fairhaven Rt-6 businesses, not-for-profit organizations principles and preemption requirements
Bridge remains an active bridge and that are independently owned and described in Executive Order 13132.
subparagraph’s (1) through (3) contain operated and are not dominant in their Also, this rule does not have tribal
the actual operating schedule for the fields, and governmental jurisdictions implications under Executive Order
bridge. The bridge continues to operate with populations of less than 50,000. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
under that schedule and the The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. with Indian Tribal Governments,
subparagraphs need to be reinserted into 605(b) that this rule will not have a because it does not have a substantial
33 CFR 117.585(a) to inform the public significant economic impact on a direct effect on one or more Indian
of the legal operating schedule of the substantial number of small entities. tribes, on the relationship between the
bridge. While some owners or operators of Federal Government and Indian tribes,
vessels intending to transit the bridge or on the distribution of power and
IV. Discussion of Final Rule may be small entities, for the reasons responsibilities between the Federal
This rule will correct 33 CFR stated in section V.A. above, this rule Government and Indian tribes.
117.585(a) by restoring subparagraphs will not have a significant economic
(1) through (3) which contain the actual impact on any vessel owner or operator. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
operating schedule for the New Bedford- While the operating schedule was The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Fairhaven Rt-6 Bridge. As paragraph (a) inadvertently removed from the rule, of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
is currently codified in the rule, there is the bridge continues to operate as it had Federal agencies to assess the effects of
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

only the introductory language. This prior to the removal of the operating their discretionary regulatory actions. In
language by itself does not explain to schedule in the CFR. particular, the Act addresses actions
the public the operating schedule for the Under section 213(a) of the Small that may result in the expenditure by a
bridge. The intention of this rule is to Business Regulatory Enforcement State, local, or tribal government, in the
restore the operating language to 33 CFR Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), aggregate, or by the private sector of
117.585(a) as it appeared immediately we want to assist small entities in $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
prior to the July 1, 2013, codification of understanding this rule. If the rule more in any one year. Though this rule
33 CFR. would affect your small business, will not result in such expenditure, we

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Feb 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 8843

do discuss the effects of this rule Dated: February 8, 2016. Synopsis of Order on Reconsideration
elsewhere in this preamble. L.L. Fagan, I. Introduction
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First
F. Environment 1. Petitioners The Videohouse, Inc.
Coast Guard District.
We have analyzed this rule under [FR Doc. 2016–03789 Filed 2–22–16; 8:45 am]
(Videohouse), Abacus Television
Department of Homeland Security (Abacus), WMTM, LLC (WMTM), and
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Management Directive 023–01 and KMYA, LLC (KMYA) seek
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, reconsideration of the Commission’s
which guides the Coast Guard in decision, on procedural and substantive
complying with the National FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS grounds, not to protect their broadcast
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 COMMISSION television stations in the repacking
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and process or make them eligible for the
47 CFR Part 73 reverse auction. At the time the Petition
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions was filed, Videohouse, Abacus, WMTM,
[GN Docket No. 12–268; FCC 16–12]
which do not individually or and KMYA were the licensees of the
cumulatively have a significant effect on Expanding the Economic and following stations, respectively: WOSC–
the human environment. This rule Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum CD, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; WPTG–
simply promulgates the operating Through Incentive Auctions CD, Pittsburgh; WIAV–CD, Washington,
regulations or procedures for DC; and KKYK–CD, Little Rock,
drawbridges. This action is categorically AGENCY: Federal Communications Arkansas. WPTG–CD and KKYK–CD
excluded from further review, under Commission. have since been acquired by Fifth Street
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the ACTION: Final rule; petition for Enterprise, LLC and Kaleidoscope
Instruction. reconsideration. Foundation, Inc., respectively. We
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of dismiss and, on alternative and
SUMMARY: In this document, the independent grounds, deny the Petition.
the Instruction, an environmental
Commission dismisses, and on separate For the reasons below, we also conclude
analysis checklist and a categorical
grounds, denies petitions for that WDYB–CD, Daytona Beach, Florida,
exclusion determination are not
reconsideration seeking reconsideration licensed to Latina Broadcasters of
required for this rule.
of the Commission’s decisions in the Daytona Beach, LLC (Latina), is not
G. Protest Activities Incentive Auction R&O and the entitled to discretionary repacking
The Coast Guard respects the First Incentive Auction Second Order on protection or eligible to participate in
Amendment rights of protesters. Reconsideration not to protect certain the reverse auction.
Protesters are asked to contact the broadcast television stations (WOSC–
CD, Pittsburgh, PA; WPTG–CD, II. Background
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
Pittsburgh, PA; WIAV–CD, Washington, 2. In the Incentive Auction R&O, the
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
DC; and KKYK–CD, Little Rock, AK) in Commission concluded that the
coordinate protest activities so that your
the repacking process or make them Spectrum Act mandates that the
message can be received without
eligible for the reverse auction. The Commission make all reasonable efforts
jeopardizing the safety or security of
Commission also concludes that to preserve, in the repacking process
people, places or vessels.
WDYB–CD, Daytona Beach, Florida is associated with the broadcast television
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 not entitled to discretionary repacking spectrum incentive auction, the
Bridges. protection or eligible to participate in coverage area and population served of
the reverse auction. only full power and Class A broadcast
For the reasons discussed in the television facilities (1) licensed as of
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 DATES: Effective February 23, 2016.
February 22, 2012, the date of
CFR part 117 as follows: ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
enactment of the Spectrum Act, or (2)
Commission, 445 12th Street SW.,
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE for which an application for a license to
Washington, DC 20554.
OPERATION REGULATIONS cover was on file as of February 22,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2012. The Commission did not interpret
Lynne Montgomery, (202) 418–2229, or the Spectrum Act, however, as
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
by email at Lynne.Montgomery@fcc.gov, precluding it from exercising discretion
continues to read as follows:
Media Bureau; Joyce Bernstein, (202) to protect additional facilities beyond
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 418–1647, or by email at
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
the statutory floor. The Commission
Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau. granted discretionary protection to a
No. 0170.1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a handful of categories of facilities, based
■ 2. Revise § 117.585(a) to read as summary of the Commission’s Order on on a careful balancing of different
follows: Reconsideration in GN Docket No. 12– factors in order to achieve the goals of
268, FCC 16–12, adopted on February 8, the Spectrum Act and other statutory
§ 117.585 Acushnet River. 2016 and released on February 12, 2016. and Commission goals.
(a) The New Bedford-Fairhaven RT–6 The full text may also be downloaded 3. One category to which the
Bridge, mile 0.0 will be opened at: www.fcc.gov. People with Commission declined to extend
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

promptly, provided proper signal is Disabilities: To request materials in discretionary protection was ‘‘out-of-
given, on the following schedule: accessible formats for people with core’’ Class A-eligible LPTV stations’’:
(1) On the hour between 6 a.m. and disabilities (braille, large print, Low power television (LPTV) stations
10 a.m. inclusive. electronic files, audio format), send an that operated on ‘‘out-of-core’’ channels
(2) At a quarter past the hour between email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the (channels 52–69) when the Community
11:15 a.m. and 6:15 p.m. inclusive. Consumer & Governmental Affairs Broadcasters Protection Act (CBPA) was
(3) At all other times on call. Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– enacted in 1999 and obtained an
* * * * * 418–0432 (tty). authorization for an ‘‘in-core’’ channel

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:15 Feb 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM 23FER1

Document Created: 2018-02-02 14:33:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 14:33:25

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective February 23, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Christopher J. Bisignano, Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District, Coast Guard; telephone (212) 514-4331 or email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 8841
RIN Number		1625-AA09

81 FR 8841 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Acushnet River, New Bedford and Fairhaven, MA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 35 (February 23, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard